ML070860230

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Slides, Perry Annual Assessment Meeting Reactor Oversight Process - Cy 2006.
ML070860230
Person / Time
Site: Perry FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/21/2007
From:
NRC/RGN-III
To:
References
Download: ML070860230 (25)


Text

Perry Annual Assessment Meeting Reactor Oversight Process - CY 2006 Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region III Lisle, Illinois March 21, 2007 1

Meeting Agenda

  • Meeting Purpose and Introductions
  • Review of Reactor Oversight Process
  • National Summary of Plant Performance
  • Discussion of Perry Performance Results
  • Licensee Response and Remarks
  • NRC Closing Remarks

<Break>

  • Public Comments and Questions of NRC 2

Purpose of Todays Meeting A public forum for discussion of the licensees performance NRC will address the licensee performance issues identified in the annual assessment letter Licensee will be given the opportunity to respond to the information in the letter and inform the NRC of new or existing programs to maintain or improve their performance 3

Region III Organization Jim Caldwell Regional Administrator Geoff Grant Deputy Regional Administrator Mark Satorius Cindy Pederson Director Division of Reactor Projects Director Division of Reactor Safety Steve West Anne Boland Deputy Director Deputy Director Eric Duncan Regional Specialists Branch Chief Perry Project/Reactor Engineers Geoffrey Wright Resident Inspectors Robert Ruiz Mark Franke Rodney Clagg Mark Wilk Paul Zurawski 4

NRC Representatives

  • James Caldwell, Region III Administrator Phone: (630) 829-9657
  • Mark Franke, Perry Senior Resident Inspector Phone: (440) 259-3610
  • Mark Wilk, Perry Resident Inspector Phone: (440) 259-3610

NRC Performance Goals Safety: Ensure protection of the public health and safety and the environment Security: Ensure the secure use and management of radioactive materials Openness: Ensure openness in our regulatory process Effectiveness: Ensure that NRC actions are effective, efficient, realistic, and timely Management: Ensure excellence in agency management to carry out the NRCs strategic objectives 6

Reactor Oversight Process Strategic Performance Areas Safety Cornerstones Baseline Inspection Performance Indicator Results Results Significance Significance Threshold Threshold Action Matrix Regulatory Response 7

Examples of Baseline Inspections

  • Equipment Alignment ~80 hrs/yr
  • Triennial Fire Protection ~200 hrs every 3 yrs
  • Operator Response ~125 hrs/yr
  • Rad Release Controls ~110 hrs every 2 yrs
  • Worker Radiation Protection ~90 hrs/yr
  • Corrective Action Program ~250 hrs every 2 yrs
  • Corrective Action Case Reviews ~60 hrs/yr 8

Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Green: Only baseline inspection White: May increase NRC oversight Yellow: Requires more NRC oversight Red: Requires more NRC oversight Inspection Findings Green: Very Low safety issue White: Low to moderate safety issue Yellow: Substantial safety issue Red: High safety issue 9

Action Matrix Concept Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiple/Rep. Unacceptable Response Response Cornerstone Degraded Performance Cornerstone Increasing Safety Significance Increasing NRC Inspection Efforts Increasing NRC/Licensee Management Involvement Increasing Regulatory Actions 10

National Summary of Plant Performance Status at End of CY 2006 Licensee Response 70 Regulatory Response 24 Degraded Cornerstone 6 Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone 3 Unacceptable 0 Total 103 11

National Summary z Performance Indicator Results (End of CY 2006)

Green 1843 White 11 Yellow 0 Red 0 z Total Inspection Findings (CY 2006)

Green 676 White 13 Yellow 0 Red 0 12

Perry Annual Assessment Summary January 1 - December 31, 2006

  • Perry operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety
  • Perry categorized within the Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone column of the NRCs Action Matrix
  • Two White findings remained open
  • Substantive cross-cutting issues in Human Performance and Problem Identification and Resolution were closed 13

Review of Perry Performance

  • August 2004 - Perry entered Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone Column of Action Matrix
  • January - May 2005 - IP 95003 Inspection
  • August 2005 - FENOC Responded to IP 95003 Supplemental Inspection Report
  • September 2005 - NRC Issued Perry CAL 14

Safety Significant Findings or PIs Two White Findings Currently Open 3/4 Air-Bound LPCS/RHR A Waterleg Pump

Corrective actions to address first failure inadequate 15

Safety Significant Findings or PIs White Emergency AC Power System MSPI 3/4 Identified in 4Q06 to be White in 2Q06 and return to Green in 3Q06 3/4 IP 95001 inspection conducted January 2007

  • No findings of significance identified
  • Root and contributing causes understood
  • Extent of condition and extent of cause identified
  • Corrective actions adequate to address causes
  • One violation identified 16

Perry Confirmatory Action Letter September 28, 2005 - Perry CAL Issued 3/4 Acknowledged FENOC Commitment to Improve Performance at Perry 3/4 Advised Perry of NRCs Plans to Conduct CAL Followup Inspections 3/4 Advised Perry that CAL Would Remain Open Pending Sustained Improved Performance 17

Completed NRC CAL Followup Inspections at Perry Completed CAL Followup Inspections 3/4 PII Phase 2 Review 3/4 IP 95002 Issues - Action Item Implementation 3/4 Corrective Action Program - Action Item Implementation 3/4 Emergency Preparedness - Action Item Implementation and Effectiveness 18

Completed NRC CAL Followup Inspections at Perry Completed CAL Followup Inspections 3/4 Human Performance - Action Item Implementation 3/4 IP 95002 Issues - Action Item Effectiveness 3/4 Human Performance - Action Item Effectiveness 3/4 Maintenance Procedure Adequacy - Action Item Effectiveness 3/4 Corrective Action Program - Action Item Effectiveness 19

Problem Identification and Resolution Cross-Cutting Issue

  • August 30, 2004 - NRC identified Problem Identification and Resolution cross-cutting issue
  • March 2, 2005 & August 30, 2005 - NRC continued to identify Problem Identification and Resolution cross-cutting issue
  • Current Assessment: Number and significance of Problem Identification and Resolution findings have declined Problem Identification and Resolution cross-cutting issue closed 20

Human Performance Cross-Cutting Issue

  • March 2, 2005 - NRC identified Human Performance cross-cutting issue
  • August 30, 2005 - NRC continued to identify Human Performance cross-cutting issue
  • Current Assessment: Number and significance of Human Performance findings have declined Human Performance cross-cutting issue closed 21

Licensee Response and Remarks FENOC 22

Contacting the NRC z Report an emergency (301) 816-5100 (call collect) z Report a safety concern:

(800) 695-7403 Allegation@nrc.gov z General information or questions www.nrc.gov Select What We Do for Public Affairs 23

Reference Sources z Reactor Oversight Process http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html z Public Electronic Reading Room http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html z Public Document Room 1-800-397-4209 (Toll Free) 24

Perry Annual Assessment Summary January 1 - December 31, 2006

  • Perry operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety
  • Perry categorized within the Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone column of the NRCs Action Matrix
  • Two White findings remained open
  • Substantive cross-cutting issues in Human Performance and Problem Identification and Resolution were closed 25