ML13101A152
| ML13101A152 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 04/10/2013 |
| From: | FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| To: | NRC/RGN-III |
| References | |
| Download: ML13101A152 (19) | |
Text
TM NRC Annual Assessment Meeting Perry Nuclear Power Plant April 10, 2013
Agenda Perry Priorities 2013
- Vito Kaminskas, Site Vice President-Perry Perry Plant Status Update
- Jim Veglia, Director, Site Maintenance-Perry Radiological Safety Program Improvements
- Stan Baker, Manager, Radiation Protection-Perry Readiness for NRC Supplemental Inspection
- John Grabnar, Director, Site Operations-Perry TM Perry NRC Annual Assessment Meeting April 10, 2013
Perry 2013 Priorities Safe, Secure, Reliable, Cost-Effective Operations Successfully Complete INPO Evaluation and Assessment Safe and Successful Completion of 1R14 Refueling Outage Perform Radiological Work Error-less and Event-free Demonstrate Commitment to Training and Qualifications to Improve Personal and Station Performance Demonstrate Performance Warranting Return to Column 1 of the NRC Reactor Oversight Process Work Together to Create an Environment of Respect, Cooperation and Recognition of Our Achievements TM Perry NRC Annual Assessment Meeting April 10, 2013
Improving Performance at Perry Focus on our Priorities Take Action on Feedback provided by:
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- Institute of Nuclear Power Operations
- Company Nuclear Review Board (CNRB)
- Internal Oversight Increased engagement with our Fleet Organization Targeting Corrective Action and Self Assessment improvement TM Perry NRC Annual Assessment Meeting April 10, 2013
Perry Plant Status Update Jim Veglia TM Perry NRC Annual Assessment Meeting April 10, 2013
Perry Plant Status 14th Refueling and Maintenance Outage Began March 18 Improvements to Enhance Worker Safety and Equipment Reliability for Safe, Long-Term Performance:
- Three New Low-Pressure Turbine Rotors
- Residual Heat Removal System Chemical Cleaning
- Major Valve Replacements
- Refueling
- Inspections and Maintenance on Plant Components, including:
Reactor Vessel, Emergency Diesel Generators, Cooling Tower TM Perry NRC Annual Assessment Meeting April 10, 2013
Outage Performance Nearly 13,000 work activities Outage Performance Goals
- Nuclear Safety
- Personal Safety
- Environmental Safety
- Radiological Safety TM Perry NRC Annual Assessment Meeting April 10, 2013
Radiological Safety Program Improvements Stan Baker TM Perry NRC Annual Assessment Meeting April 10, 2013
Radiological Safety Program Improvements Increased Management Oversight and Coaching Enhanced Worker Ownership and Engagement Increased Accountability Improved worker behaviors are anchored in our processes and procedures to ensure safe, sustained performance TM Perry NRC Annual Assessment Meeting April 10, 2013
Tools to Enhance Decision-Making Workers use the 2-Minute Drill 2 Minute Drill 2-Minute D rill Potential Job Si Permits/Procedu te Hazards re Housekeeping/
Card for safe, event-free Confined Space Overhead Load s
LigHe atng hti Str
/Ves FME s tilation en Slips/Trips/Falls Chemical Use/Sto performance Pinch Points Bending / Liftin rage Sharp/Hot/We Zero Energy t Surfaces g Electrical Heat Stress Line of Fire Supervisors use the READE Tool What Recognize and Miti gate Risk for better decision-making
- What task are we
- What errors could performing?
be made?
Risk
- What is the probab ility (chance) of it hap Risk = Likelihood x Consequence
- What are the con pening?
sequences if it happe Mitigation ns?
A deliberate decision making method to respond to* What are we doi ng to make sure it doe uncertain situations that promotes better decision-making,
- What tools are app snt happen?
more predictable results and less risk. licable?
- 1. Recognize the degraded condition or uncertain situation that threatens Wh at de fen ses are in place?
safety. What else can ha
- 2. Express the situation in terms of consequences, if left alone, related to ppen?
the following:
Plant safety and reliability An Engaged Thi Personal safety and well-being nking Organization Prevents Events Environmental safety SOER 10-2
- 3. Appraise the situation, with a questioning attitude, to identify conditions that could threaten safety, such as the following:
Conflicts with safety and pressure to proceed with the plan Degree of familiarity with the situation - how novel is it Time available to make a decision Degree of coordination, complexity, and margin sources of stress Sources of stress Availability of resources and support Assumptions that need validated NOTE: The less time available to make an informed decision, then the more readily one should yield to safety.
- 4. Decide what to do to resolve the situation safely. Compare Appraisal (step 3) to critical parameters, safety limit, or abort criteria. Consider what absolutely has to go right. Stop when unsure. Do not proceed in the face of uncertainty.
- 5. Evaluate the effectiveness of the action(s) (step 4) in achieving the desired results. Perform a post-job brief.
Did you document your decision? Rev. 01 TM Perry NRC Annual Assessment Meeting April 10, 2013
Success of Radiological Safety Program Safe Work Performance Monitor and Adjust Performance Track Performance TM Perry NRC Annual Assessment Meeting April 10, 2013
Performance Indicators Dose Performance 2012 PCE Performance 2012 Dose Rate/Dose Alarms LHRA Performance TM Perry NRC Annual Assessment Meeting April 10, 2013
Readiness for NRC 95002 Inspection John Grabnar TM Perry NRC Annual Assessment Meeting April 10, 2013
Continuous Improvement Process Strategy Realign for Gap Improvement Identification Action to Close Monitor Results Gaps TM Perry NRC Annual Assessment Meeting April 10, 2013
Continuous Improvement Process Initiated investigative process through Corrective Action Program Gap to identify gaps in performance Identification Implemented actions required to close gaps:
- Radiation Protection Action to
- Corrective Action Program Close Gaps
- Risk Management
- Human Performance
- Accountability TM Perry NRC Annual Assessment Meeting April 10, 2013
Continuous Improvement Process Monitor performance through:
- Coaching and Observations Monitor
- Worker Feedback Results
- Data Collection
- Performance Indicators Realign for Realign for Improvement Improvement
- Initiated additional cause analyses based on monitoring results Strategy
- Initiated additional corrective Strategy actions TM Perry NRC Annual Assessment Meeting April 10, 2013
Objectives of Supplemental 95002 Inspection Objective 1: Provide assurance that the root and contributing causes of individual and collective risk-significant performance issues are understood.
Objective 2: Independently assess and provide assurance that the extent of condition and extent of cause of individual and collective risk-significant performance issues are identified.
Objective 3: Independently determine if safety culture components caused or significantly contributed to the individual and collective risk-significant performance issues.
Objective 4: Provide assurance that corrective actions for risk-significant performance issues are sufficient to address the root and contributing causes and prevent recurrence.
TM Perry NRC Annual Assessment Meeting April 10, 2013
Perry is Ready for Supplemental Inspection Through FENOC Continuous Improvement Process, we have:
- Implemented corrective actions to close performance gaps
- Met the four objectives of the 95002 Inspection Process
- Meeting milestones to confirm our readiness for inspection We look forward to demonstrating our improved performance during the NRC supplemental inspection beginning June 10.
TM Perry NRC Annual Assessment Meeting April 10, 2013
TM Perry NRC Annual Assessment Meeting April 10, 2013