ML14239A328

Farley, Units 1 and 2, - Third Six-Month Status Report of the Implementation of the Requirements of the Commission Order with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051)

ML14239A328
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	08/26/2014
From:	Pierce C R Southern Co, Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
EA-12-051, NL-14-1109
Download: ML14239A328 (6)

Text

\. Charles R. Pierce Southern Nuclear Regulatory Affairs Director Operating

Company, Inc. 40 Inverness Center Parkway Post Ollice Box 1295 Birmingham.

AL 35201 AUG 2 6 2014 Docket Nos.: 50-348 50-364 Tel 205.992.7872 Fax 205.992.7601 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 SOUTHERN COMPANY NL-14-1109 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant -Units 1 and 2

References:

Third Six-Month Status Report of the Implementation of the Requirements of the Commission Order with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051)

1. NRC Order Number EA-12-051, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, dated March 12, 2012. 2. NRC Interim Staff Guidance JLD-ISG-2012-03, Compliance with Order EA-12-051, Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation, Revision o, dated August 29, 2012. 3. NEI 12-02, Industry Guidance for Compliance with NRC Order EA-12-051, "To Modify Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation",

Revision 1, dated August 2012. 4. Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Initial Status Report in Response to Commission Order with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051),

dated October 23, 2012. 5. Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Commission Order with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051),

dated February 27,2013.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

On March 12, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued an order (Reference

1) to Southern Nuclear Operating Company.

Reference 1 was immediately effective and directs the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant -Units 1 and 2 (FNP) to install reliable spent fuel pool instrumentation.

Specific requirements are outlined in Attachment 2 of Reference 1 . Reference 1 required submission of an initial status report 60 days following issuance of the final interim staff guidance (Reference

2) and an overall integrated plan pursuant to Section IV, Condition C.1.a of Reference

1. Reference 2 endorses industry guidance document NEI 12-02, Revision 1 (Reference

3) with clarifications and exceptions identified in Reference

2. Reference 4 provided the FNP initial status report regarding spent fuel pool instrumentation strategies.

Reference 5 provided the FNP overall integrated plan.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NL-14-1109 Page2 Reference 1 requires submission of a status report at six-month intervals following submittal of the overall integrated plan. Reference 3 provides direction regarding the content of the status reports.

The purpose of this letter is to provide the third month status report pursuant to Section IV, Condition C.2, of Reference 1, that delineates progress made in implementing the requirements of Reference

1. The enclosed report provides an update of milestone accomplishments since the last status report, including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief and the basis, if any. This letter contains no new NRC commitments.

If you have any questions, please contact John Giddens at 205.992.7924.

Mr. C. R. Pierce states he is the Regulatory Affairs Director for Southern Nuclear Operating

Company, is authorized to execute this oath on behalf of Southern Nuclear Operating Company and, to the best of his knowledge and belief, the facts set forth in this letter are true. Respectfully submitted, C. R. Pierce Regulatory Affairs Director CRP/JMG/GS dayof Notary Public My commission expires:

ID /t/ilo(1

Enclosure:

Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant -Units 1 and 2 Third Six-Month Status Report Regarding Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051) cc: Southern Nuclear Operating Company Mr. S. E. Kuczynski,

Chairman, President

& CEO Mr. D. G. Bast, Executive Vice President

& Chief Nuclear Officer Ms. C. A. Gayheart, Vice President

-Farley Mr. B. L. lvey, Vice President-Regulatory Affairs Mr. D. R. Madison, Vice President

-Vogtle Mr. T. E. Tynan, Vice President

-Fleet Operations Mr. B. J. Adams, Vice President

-Engineering Mr. R.R. Martin, Regulatory Manager-Farley RTYPE: CFA04.054

. -.... -'* *. ... . ---. , _, ... * ...... : .... *,.,.. .* . . . . ... .** '2014.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NL-14-1109 Page 3 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. D. H. Dorman, Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations (Acting)

Mr. V. M. McCree, Regional Administrator Mr. S. A. Williams, NRR Project Manager-Farley Mr. P. K. Niebaum, Senior Resident Inspector-Farley Mr. K. E. Miller, Resident Inspector-Farley Mr. B. A. Purnell, NRR/JLD/PMB Mr. S. A. Jones, NRR/DSS/SBPB Alabama Department of Public Health Dr. D. E. Williamson, State Health Officer Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant -Units 1 and 2 Third Six-Month Status Report of the Implementation of the Requirements of the Commission Order with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation CEA-12-051)

Enclosure Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant -Units 1 and 2 Third Six-Month Status Report Regarding Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051)

Enclosure to NL-14-1109 Third Six-Month Status Report of SFPI OIP Implementation 1 Introduction Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant -Units 1 and 2 Third Six-Month Status Report Regarding Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation CEA-12-051)

Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 developed an Overall Integrated Plan (Reference 1 of this enclosure),

documenting the requirements to install reliable spent fuel pool (SFP) instrumentation, in response to Reference

2. This attachment provides an update of milestone accomplishments since submittal of the last status report, including any changes to the compliance method, schedule, or need for relief/relaxation and the basis, if any. 2 Milestone Accomplishments In addition to the submittal of status reports, the following milestone(s) directly related to SFP instrumentation implementation have been completed since the previous 6-month update, and are current as of June 30, 2014:

• Develop Modifications Unit 2 3 Milestone Schedule Status The following provides an update to the milestone schedule to support the Overall Integrated Plan. This section provides the activity status of each item, and whether the expected completion date has changed.

The dates are planning dates subject to change as design and implementation details are developed.

Target Activity Revised Target Milestone Completion Status Completion Date Date Submit 60 Day Status Report Oct 2012 Complete N/A Submit Overall Integrated Plan Feb 2013 Complete N/A Unit 21st RFO Mav2013 Complete N/A Submit 6 Month Status Report Aug 2013 Complete N/A Unit 1 1st RFO Nov 2013 Complete N/A Develop Modifications Unit 2 May2014 Complete N/A Submit 6 Month Status Report Feb 2014 Complete N/A Receipt of Unit 2 SFP Instrument Channel Jun 2014 In Progress July 2014 Develop Modifications Unit 1 Sep 2014 In Progress Oct 2014 Receipt of Unit 1 SFP Instrument Channel Jun 2014 In Progress July 2014 Complete Functional Test of Unit 2 SFP 30 2014 Started Instruments Submit 6 Month Status Report Aug 2014 Complete N/A Complete Functional Test of Unit 1 SFP 40 2014 Not Started 10 2015 Instruments Unit 2 Implementation Complete (2nd RFO)* Nov 2014 Not Started Submit 6 Month Status Report Feb 2015 Not Started Unit 1 Implementation Complete (2nd RFO)* Apr 2015 Not Started Submit Completion Report Jun 2015 Not Started *Full compliance after second listed refueling outage E-1 Enclosure to NL-14-1109 Third Six-Month Status Report of SFPI OIP Implementation 4 Changes to Compliance Method There are no changes to the compliance method as documented in the Overall Integrated Plan (Reference 1 of this enclosure).

Since the method of providing portable generation to the SFP Instrumentation will not be in place until the FLEX modifications are implemented, a standing order and associated procedures will initially be in place for Unit 2 which will allow for temporary portable generation.

5 Need for Relief/Relaxation and Basis for the Relief/Relaxation Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 expects to comply with the order implementation date and no relief/relaxation is required at this time. 6 Open Items from Interim Staff Evaluation As discussed with the NRC staff, the Interim Staff Evaluation (ISE) Open Items for SFP Instrumentation are the only remaining issues. The NRC provided seventeen (17) requests for additional information (RAis) by letter on October 30, 2013. These RAis have been addressed by separate SNC E-Portal postings on March 25, 2014 and June 29, 2104. 7 Potential Interim Staff Evaluation Impacts There are no potential impacts to the Interim Staff Evaluation identified at this time except for those identified in Section 6. 8 References The following references support the updates to the Overall Integrated Plan described in this enclosure:

1. Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Overall Integrated Plan in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051),"

dated February 27, 2013. 2. NRC Order Number EA-12-051, "Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation,"

dated March 12, 2012. 3. "Interim Staff Evaluation and Request for Additional Information

-Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (FNP) Regarding Overall Integrated Plan (OIP) for Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (Order Number EA-12-051)

(TAC NOS. MF1429 and MF 1430)," dated October 30, 2013. 9 Other Additional Information The following information provides clarity or corrections to the Overall Integrated Plan but do not constitute a change in strategy:

• Although not explicitly stated in the response to RAI 5 posted on the Portal on June 29, 2014, Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 will not be using a stilling well. E-2