|
---|
Category:Report
MONTHYEARNL-22-0510, Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20212022-07-14014 July 2022 Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2021 ML21214A3182021-08-0202 August 2021 301 Comments NL-20-0713, Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic2020-09-21021 September 2020 Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic NL-20-0034, Inservice Inspection Program Owner'S Activity Report for Outage 1R292020-01-17017 January 2020 Inservice Inspection Program Owner'S Activity Report for Outage 1R29 NL-19-0674, Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 12019-09-30030 September 2019 Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 1 NL-19-0795, Cameron Non-Proprietary Engineering Reports; ER-1180NP, Rev. 1, ER-1181NP, Rev. 1; ER-1182NP, Rev. 1; and ER-1183NP, Rev. 1.2019-05-31031 May 2019 Cameron Non-Proprietary Engineering Reports; ER-1180NP, Rev. 1, ER-1181NP, Rev. 1; ER-1182NP, Rev. 1; and ER-1183NP, Rev. 1. NL-17-1713, Proposed Alternative GEN-ISI-ALT-2017-03, and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-07, Version 1.0 Service Water Evaluation for Code Case N-513-4 for Moderate Pressure, and for Higher Pressure2018-04-0606 April 2018 Proposed Alternative GEN-ISI-ALT-2017-03, and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-07, Version 1.0 Service Water Evaluation for Code Case N-513-4 for Moderate Pressure, and for Higher Pressure NL-17-2061, Special Report 2017-002-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B2017-12-14014 December 2017 Special Report 2017-002-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B NL-17-1401, Post Accident Monitoring Report for 8 Train RVLIS2017-08-10010 August 2017 Post Accident Monitoring Report for 8 Train RVLIS NL-16-2541, Notification of 10 CFR 26.719(c) 30-Day Report for False Positive Drug Test Results2016-11-29029 November 2016 Notification of 10 CFR 26.719(c) 30-Day Report for False Positive Drug Test Results NL-16-0810, Submittal of Post Accident Monitoring Report2016-06-0909 June 2016 Submittal of Post Accident Monitoring Report NL-16-0683, Special Report No. 2016-002-00, Alternate AC Source Out of Service2016-06-0202 June 2016 Special Report No. 2016-002-00, Alternate AC Source Out of Service NL-16-0751, Special Report 2016-001-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B and R-60C2016-05-23023 May 2016 Special Report 2016-001-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B and R-60C ML16103A5722016-04-21021 April 2016 Transmittal of Final Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 2, Accident Sequence Precursor Analysis ML16103A5732016-04-21021 April 2016 Final ASP Analysis (LER 364-14-002) ML15253A4102016-03-11011 March 2016 Enclosure 2 Screening Analysis Report NL-15-2276, Submittal of 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20142015-12-23023 December 2015 Submittal of 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2014 NL-15-1489, 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-12082015-08-17017 August 2015 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-1208 ML15226A2292015-07-31031 July 2015 PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals NL-15-1507, J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals2015-07-31031 July 2015 J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals ML15182A1752015-06-26026 June 2015 Completion of Required Action by NRC Order EA-12-051 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Level Instrumentation ML15106A3102015-04-17017 April 2015 April 22, 2015, Meeting with Southern Nuclear Company, Draft Minimum Shift Staffing Analysis NL-15-0418, Revision 6, Pressure Temperature Limits Reports2015-03-0505 March 2015 Revision 6, Pressure Temperature Limits Reports NL-15-0080, Special Report 2015-001-002015-01-26026 January 2015 Special Report 2015-001-00 NL-14-1899, Vogle, Units 1 and 2 - 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20132014-12-0808 December 2014 Vogle, Units 1 and 2 - 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2013 NL-14-1109, Third Six-Month Status Report of the Implementation of the Requirements of the Commission Order with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051)2014-08-26026 August 2014 Third Six-Month Status Report of the Implementation of the Requirements of the Commission Order with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051) ML14128A0832014-06-0303 June 2014 Staff Assessment of the Flooding Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 ML14101A1192014-04-16016 April 2014 Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident ML14098A4752014-04-16016 April 2014 Unit 1 - Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident NL-14-0342, Units 1 and 2, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites2014-03-31031 March 2014 Units 1 and 2, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 62014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 6 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 2172014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 217 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 562 ML14051A7342014-02-20020 February 2014 Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 562 NL-14-0249, Enclosure 1, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 22014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 1, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 2 ML14071A0622014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 1 of 562 Through 46 of 562 ML14071A0632014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End ML14071A0642014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 47 of 562 Through 90 of 562 ML14071A0652014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 91 of 562 Through 125 of 562 ML14071A0662014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 126 of 562 Through 160 of 562 ML14071A0682014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 197 of 562 Through 233 of 562 ML14071A0692014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 234 of 562 Through 272 of 562 ML14071A0702014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 273 of 562 Through 312 of 562 ML14071A0712014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 562 ML14071A0762014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562 2022-07-14
[Table view] Category:Technical
MONTHYEARNL-22-0510, Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20212022-07-14014 July 2022 Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2021 NL-20-0713, Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic2020-09-21021 September 2020 Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic NL-19-0674, Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 12019-09-30030 September 2019 Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 1 NL-19-0795, Cameron Non-Proprietary Engineering Reports; ER-1180NP, Rev. 1, ER-1181NP, Rev. 1; ER-1182NP, Rev. 1; and ER-1183NP, Rev. 1.2019-05-31031 May 2019 Cameron Non-Proprietary Engineering Reports; ER-1180NP, Rev. 1, ER-1181NP, Rev. 1; ER-1182NP, Rev. 1; and ER-1183NP, Rev. 1. NL-17-1401, Post Accident Monitoring Report for 8 Train RVLIS2017-08-10010 August 2017 Post Accident Monitoring Report for 8 Train RVLIS ML16103A5722016-04-21021 April 2016 Transmittal of Final Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 2, Accident Sequence Precursor Analysis ML16103A5732016-04-21021 April 2016 Final ASP Analysis (LER 364-14-002) ML15226A2292015-07-31031 July 2015 PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals NL-15-1507, J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals2015-07-31031 July 2015 J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals ML14098A4752014-04-16016 April 2014 Unit 1 - Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident NL-14-0342, Units 1 and 2, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites2014-03-31031 March 2014 Units 1 and 2, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 197 of 562 Through 233 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 197 of 562 Through 233 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 273 of 562 Through 312 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 273 of 562 Through 312 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End2014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 1, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachme2014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 1, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 - Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report2014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 - Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 1 of 562 Through 46 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 1 of 562 Through 46 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 126 of 562 Through 160 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 126 of 562 Through 160 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 47 of 562 Through 90 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 47 of 562 Through 90 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 91 of 562 Through 125 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 91 of 562 Through 125 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 234 of 562 Through 272 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 234 of 562 Through 272 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 108 of 217 Through 161 of 2172014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 108 of 217 Through 161 of 217 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 2172014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 217 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 62014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 6 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 562 ML14071A0692014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 234 of 562 Through 272 of 562 ML14071A0812014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 162 of 217 Through 193 of 217 ML14071A0802014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 108 of 217 Through 161 of 217 ML14071A0792014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 217 ML14071A0742014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 562 ML14071A0772014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 6 ML14071A0762014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562 ML14071A0752014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 562 ML14071A0732014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 562 ML14071A0722014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 562 ML14071A0712014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 562 ML14071A0702014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 273 of 562 Through 312 of 562 ML14071A0682014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 197 of 562 Through 233 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 161 of 562 Through 196 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 161 of 562 Through 196 of 562 ML14071A0672014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 161 of 562 Through 196 of 562 ML14071A0662014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 126 of 562 Through 160 of 562 ML14071A0652014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 91 of 562 Through 125 of 562 ML14071A0642014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 47 of 562 Through 90 of 562 ML14071A0632014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End ML14071A0622014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 1 of 562 Through 46 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 562 2022-07-14
[Table view] |
Text
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of ý4Plf Status: Y[] N ULE]Equipment ID No. QIP18COO2B.
Pkq Equip. Class' 12 Fl-80 Equipment Description TRAIN B EMERGENCY AIR COMPRESSOR Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 189 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI NE]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawings in the package used to veriofy this anchorage configuration are H-37787-A/U-262818.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y0 NEI UM] N/AE YZ NEI UE] N/AE]Y0 NE- UE] N/AE]Y0 NEI UE] N/AE YN NO U-I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 313 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of)W 7,.4i Status: YE[ NE U0I]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIP18COO2B.
Pkq Equip. Class' 12 FI-80 Equipment Description TRAIN B EMERGENCY AIR COMPRESSOR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Tubing too close to piping, see pix, entered in CAP (CR505553, CR504972)YZ NEI UE N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ Nil UQ N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
nothing noted overhead that can collapse, see #7.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?electrical, tubing, ppg insp;ected YZ NO UO N/AC 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ Nl U-t of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?see #7 Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
nothing found, see AWB fpor Rm 189 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
None This package was originally signed on 8-21-12 but retyped for clarity on 10-23-12.Evaluated by: PaulMiktus, Steven Yuan by Telecon I1/ 30 Date: 8/21/12 8121/12 Page 314 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 a Page 315 of 562 A17ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 316 of 562 A'I-IACHMENT~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~As 3: SE S I WA K O N C E K I TSN .S C 1 4 R T-11E S O .AAW!Page 317 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 0 Page 318 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 z Page 319 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 , I I ý , ( I Shee i of X5 Status: Y7 N- Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1P9IH-V2228 Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description PZR PORV BACK-UP AIR SUPPLY VALVE Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 223 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO- No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
YO- NO] Ur- N/A0 infl4vit coy O'n-er ~ -WAe.- ts 00 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation'?
YE7] NE] UE] N/A0 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] UE] N/A["I- tk~A QWVOc('j*ý Avfte. i -%O noQeKSuQ 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
YO- NE] UE] N/AZ V%6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YIRNO L]l"\ \"tl o C jlasses of0 E qupnAt.'Enter the equipment ctass name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 320 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Shee 2 ofN(5 Status: Y7F N1" U[" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1P19HV2228 Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description PZR PORV BACK-UP AIR SUPPLY VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free fiom impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Y9 NEI UD N/A-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y13 ND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Bent overhead light fixture that is strapped to a conduit support west of QtP19HV2228.
This light fixture is held by a cable with no attachment bolts.There is no potential for seismic interaction concern since the fixture is connectedlte a cable and the cable is not expected to rupture.YZ NO UD N/AD Y0 ND UD Bent overhead light fixture that is strapped to a near by conduit east of Q 1R45EITE1310 (Aux Bid Emergency light "R").There is no potential for seismic interaction concern since the fixture is connectedgtea cable and the cable is not expected to rupture.Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 ND UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
~3aa.C:~7JC fAJ.~Jr Page 321 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 Status: N NO Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No, QtP19HV2228 Equip. ClassI 7 Equipment DesciiptioA PL POE* BACK.UP AIR SUPPLY VALVE qogn %- e S-af-a-ýVate. -T I zi // -Z, Evaluated by: TvIr r-a V'ic, Page 322 of 562 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS v PORV BKUP AIR SUPPLY Q1P19HV2228 11111181 1111111111 11111 Page 323 of 562 A'TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 324 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheetus of: (a Status: YC] NZ U-" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIP19HV3611 Equip, Class' 7 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR ISOLATION OUTSIDE CTMT VALVE Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area C.)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI Ni of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
YE] NEI UE N/Ad YE] NE] UE] N/AEf 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI UE] N/A[9 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YE] N] UE] N/A Y5' NO UE]'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 325 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 A,/C-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIP19HV3611 Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description INSTRUMENT AIR ISOLATION OUTSIDE CTMT VALVE Sheet 2 Of4 Status: Y[i NEý U!]Intermction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?UM] N/A-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[d NO Ut N/A0]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO Nlj Ut] N/AO ObAt~y\M a kkOL V AA Q- Q.('O- Q3,CAbsV4r.A Ks4c, ~ ~ .\10. Based on the above seismic interacton evaluations, is equipment free YlE" NCi UE] -of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YJZ'N[I Ut]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by: Date:a/a(;12 4?o 11 /V, ralm ef o. Z-Page 326 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 327 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0-- r t I"/9 Ii Page 328 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 329 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 VJ 10 "7 T Page 330 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of/ 4 Status: I N] U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR1BO04 Equip.Equipment Description LC TRANSFORMER ID Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorane 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Ylt NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yt1 NO ur- N/AC Y)9 NC UM N/AC Yf NCI UC' N/AD YoN UC N/AC Y% NC UC IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 331 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0* J -, Sheet 2 of 4+Status: YA NEI U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1RI 18004. Equip. ClassýEquipment Description LC TRANSFORMER IQ Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Y$ NEI UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo ND UD N/AFJ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YP ND UD N/AD YQ NODU Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yn NDI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) tiJRPEOiTo M9*15 -VW6E0 WW M br~C H QJD~~~ ev jAr Evaluated by: 'A/tYV'iC k4j ugwa Mac & Jcv\'hPg -3 32 of56 Page 332 of 562 Date: 91-'da4 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 333 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0-T Page 334 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i ow Status: YI2 NEI UD-'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0IR17I8001A Equip. Class' I Equipment Description MCC 1A Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room. Area 332 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?YVNr"I Ur N/AD NO UO N/AC YEn'NO UO N/AD 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
Y2"NJ U- N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required)txl4& S OVA -Ro0-r OWl Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of NE Ur "A C potentially adverse seismic conditions?
.1A V'XQ-b% "-f 4$lsýdýv -0* cv-&f-ks / cN,.*(AJ I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 335 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OIRI7BOO1-A Equip. Class'Equipment Description MCC 1A Sheet 2 Of 9 Status: Y[If/J UrL-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Y1/4J-N UQ N/As YPNO U1-1 N/AD 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yj N" U- N/AD W-t& t,)W' Ckuv--5 a.% ~SAL 11L )4eYL- A c4 t~. C tuT ~uQ ( 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE(ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?5'i&N **t JW' C. 0 ,J'br ,c Other Adverse Conditions 4o-r xd buoll 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y&1N0 U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) ii 54~7f 6ýZIA/Evaluated by:°--/7 -- _- =- i ..... .Date:%_ 1-1 L..)CJ -Z" Page 336 of 562 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 7, I Page 337 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 338 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of / 1 Status: YE] NE] U1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR15A504 Equip. Class' 3 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR IJ Location:
Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area CCIai Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraie 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?e- (iLi ti I a- c,-ý jd " *2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
LM 0-ý7347-A2 YD NID U N/AD Y[I N[] U09 N/AD YD' NDI UW N/ADl Y[D ND UW N/AD1 YF9 ND UM IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 339 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofý'4'q Status: Yo NE] U: Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR6SA504 Equip. Class'Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 1J Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Y NEI UO N/A[8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y ND U N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yo ND U' N/AD Yý NO U-Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NDi UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) ( o0 7 A"eo wckivC- N t s \ r- Aj~o~ckr i~sitz 701 -1R rR--n %'-.nO Jk0~e* 'in- are40kjbA4&U-U tpEftL iS reS01\,Cei, Evaluated by:
Q Mad0ct\4'-C7 U 0a 4 Date: SlLQIJ0/1-
-~ , 1#YAý1oAt
-0t" Page 340 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 s3 R- 1,: Page 341 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 342 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 SheSt t 1 ofN I'Status: Y[M NEIl U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR16BO06 Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description 600V LOAD CENTER ID Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area 05_Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
I NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
sey~c F3 Lx e 4t4LJ 5/l./. viW , +fi tf,, "* A-L.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y Nr] UCI N/AC Y NEI U0 N/ADI Y",NEI Ur] N/AC Yý NCI UCI N/ArI NIN UC I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 343 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 PI-'i(o FH4 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR16BO06 Equip. Class Equipment Description 600V LOAD CENTER ID Sheet 2 ofg4 Status: Y0 O U-]Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?UD u[ N/AD YXND UD N/AD Yý ND UD N/AD YOUNOUQ Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YJ ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) nat mw ef L~ead e4&&. WtlIA 4, rmo w~ ~ 6aA~at444 Ca u;UoI t tot VOh ý*I ~J~f Cj.¶AiVN4'tOI4ar (F)'99).Evaluated y AJMj 7t ~XC)J 6 L&A L~AtWr MacdCt Date: -2. izI'I Qj I Page 344 of 562 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 345 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 L 41 Page 346 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of,.'Status: YD N[I] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR17B504-A Equip. Class 1 1 Equipment Description MCC 1K Location:
Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188.5 Room, Area ..Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraie 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NW, of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yý NO UM0 N/Ar YM NO UO N/Ap4 yepev Wwa&W,%.~
Tkme i4,q z/,+/zitIZOAot*
YCl NC UC N/AQ9 YIPNO UC Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 347 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofX q Status: Y10 NE] LTD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1R17B504-A Equip. Class, I Equipment Description MCC 1K Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ)N[ UO N/AO YqO NO UD N/AO YW NO U[ N/AD NoU0 Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YP NDI UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Am v, iv- i~ -kd n FýDate: _111li_ z 9/iij ' /e -Page 348 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 349 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS r1- I tp NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 350 of 562