ML14071A066

Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 126 of 562 Through 160 of 562

ML14071A066
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	02/20/2014
From:	Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A066 (35)

Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1 - 461 Sheet i oft 'I Status: YZ NE] UV]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OIHIINGPiC2505F Equip. Class '20 Equipment Description Process ControlCabinetChannrel 2 Location: Bldg. Aux Floor El. 155' Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraze

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Ys NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NO UD N/AD

3. Is the anchorage free of conrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO U- N/AO oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NO U13 N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO U- N/A-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configurationswere verified against the configurationsin SEWS for QIH1 1NGPIC2505F,QIHI INGPIC2505Hand QIHI INGSSP2506J.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0 NO U" potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 126 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 jk~{o Sheet 2 ofg 1 h#

FAl- bk Status: YE NM UM 01i-la/

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1H!,1NGPIC2505F Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description Process Control Cabinet Channel2 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UO N/AC

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE UO N/A" and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 NO U- N/AO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NO UJO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Paul k Date: 08-21-12 Stephen Yuan ',j c o ' , 08-21-12

/"I Page 127 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 128 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

(lb Page 129 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 130 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 131 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 t

Page 132 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 133 of 562

A'TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 134 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 135 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 4C!b Page 136 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS

-I' 0

!ý C21 Page 137 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 138 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 139 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 140 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 6 Status: Y0 NEI U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlID No. QIHI 1NGR25041. Equip. Class' 20 Pka FI-41 Equipment Description RADIA TION MONITOR PANEL Location: Bldg, AUXILIARY Floor El. 155 Room, Area 11!6 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgrnents and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NEI UE] N/AE

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NE] UE] N/A0 oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] UE N/AQ

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE] UE] NiA0 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference U733260 V2

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NO U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 141 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ N[] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QlHIINGR25041, Equip. Class' 20 Pka F1-41 Equipment Description RADIATION MONITOR PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 NE UD N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO UO N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No overheaditems.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NO U-I N/AD Visible Conduits adequately flexible.

Also cabinet is very rigid.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y0 ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cabinet adjacent(N-42) per D-175069 is < 3/4" away, but adequatelystiff to pose no adverse seismic 1/A concern.

This package was originallysigned on 8-21-12 but retyped for clarifty on 10-15-12.

Evaluated by: Steven Yuan by Telecon /lit: Date: 8/21/12 Pauft iktus /

8/21/12 Page 142 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 143 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.U M!n i4

-7 1,1 1c.

Page 144 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fr1*1* r I 51~6 Page 145 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

. Page 146 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 14 Status: YZ NF] Ur-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIHIINGSSP2506G Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description SOLID STATE PROTECTION INPUT CABINET Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155 Room, Area 416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgrnents and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y0 NOI UO1 N/AOt

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y0 NO! UO3 N/AO oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NOI UO3 N/A-

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y0 NO UO1 N/A--1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference SEWS for QIHI INGSSP2506J dated 5/25/94 and 2506G 5/25/94. Verified anchorage by pulling up carpetfrom front and back of QIH11NSSP2506G, H & I.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ Ni7 Un potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 147 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 14 Status: YZ NEI U]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIHI 1NGSSP2506G Equip. Class' 20

, Pke FI-42 Equipment Description SOLID STATE PROTECTION INPUT CABINET Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NEI UD N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NDI UrI N/ADl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NDI UDI N/AD]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NO UI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 ND UDI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

No Comments Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Cabinetadjacent (N-42)per D-175069 is < 3/4" away, but adequately stiff to pose no adverse seismic I/A concern.

This package was originallysigned on 8-21-12 but retyped for clarity on 10-15-12.

Evaluated by: ~~uanbvTeIecon ,cbs/v 2- Date: 8/21/12 Piau~kMlktus' 8/21/12 Page 148 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS LA Page 149 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 150 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Z-'

Page 151 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 k-"

4 Page 152 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 6,

A Page 153 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 154 of 562

VERSION 2.0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, CHECKLISTS WALKDOWN 3: SEISMIC ATTACHMENT 562 Page 155 of

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 156 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 157 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 158 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 159 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 160 of 562