ML14071A070

Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 273 of 562 Through 312 of 562

ML14071A070
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	02/20/2014
From:	Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A070 (40)

Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of '4 FI-71 Status: YrfNRIU Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1P16V579 Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description B TRAIN SERVICE WATER MINIFLOW Location: Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area J2A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI- NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YFJ NO UD N/A$)

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yr NO UFC] N/As*

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yrll NO UI- N/A*

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NE UO N/A#

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

ý NO UC I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 273 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 H-~ /

Sheet 2 ofW Status: Yo N] U07 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP26Y57L. Equip. Class)

Equipment Description 8 TRAIN SERVICE WA TERR MIA !FOW Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yý NO UO N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NO UD N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yý N171 UO N/AOl

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yý NEI UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[NE U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A Isc i f ewre Evaluatedby: ... . Date: q/iji2 Page 274 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS a1plo-V579 Z Page 275 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 276 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: Y2 NEI] UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment lD No. QIP17HOOIC Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description CCW HEA T EXCHANGER TRAIN A Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area IR 5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YNQý of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

• D2z oG 5' 7 OZ r. (o.o

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? NO UO N/AO

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YeNO U- N/A' oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible. cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y`NO UI- N/A"

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? NYWO U- N/A0 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of *NP"ur-U potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 277 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet92 of 3 Status: Y1 Ni] U[M Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP17HOO1C Equip. Class, Equipment Description CCW HEAT EXCHANGER TRA)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? ND U" N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YXNN- ULD N/AD]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? tND U" N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y NDU[D of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y/ND UDI]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) do VZA Evaluated by:

S~Ir I~,W &2A

-(.--

Date: 2 Z7 _.

It1YL~(~ 4011

V. *-'r

-S-6 76.)1-Z/

Page 278 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 279 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 f$A F 1-7. s Status: NEI U0]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment]ID No. Q IP1 7HV3045 Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description CCW RETURN FROM RCP THERMAL BARRIER ISOLATION Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 0 ,

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y] NO/

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NE] UE N/A3/

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE] UE] N/AO' oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[E] NE] UE] N/AE<

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO] N1 UO] N/ANI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

YE] NE] UE]

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

8n',Sq\ 3rh WIQ ob&O-. '*ifCas o nt cfEqim

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 280 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofg*

Status: NJN U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP17HV3045 Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description CCW RETURN FROM RCP THERMAL BARRIER ISOLATION Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yt ND UD N/A]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yt NEI U-] N/AD1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yd1 NEI UDI N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ý NM U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[?1 ND UD' adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date:- z I It 9

• a,-.371-.

Page 281 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 282 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

ý,A F-U 3 j

'I 11 Page 283 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

~.l.

Sheet o S .tatus: Yd NO] U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QWP17HV3067 Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description CCW RETURN FROM EXCESS LETDOWN Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area Ca Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchornee

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yn NE UO N/A"

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO0 NO UM NIAV" oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO0 NO UQ /A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YOE NO UQ N/A@t*

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YijNEI potentially adverse seismic conditions? N/25 SA eIp

- C nmfoAe o 0B:A

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 284 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Status: Y*N[*U*[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP17HV3067 Equip. Class 7.

Equipment Description CCW RETURN FROM EXCESS LETDOWN Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y['NO UC N/A[

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YRNCI UIC N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YV/NC UC N/AO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yj'NE U1:C of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yjý NC' UCI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date: L&I I I.__

[. al ......

521/1 L'-

Page 285 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOMWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Shee 3 of 3 Status:

• N[ U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP17HV3067 Equip. Class, 7 Equipmtet Description CCW RETURN FROM EXCESS LETDOWN PhotovraDhs N" "J Note:

Note: Note:

Page 286 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 ofg 7TYr-Status: YE] NJý UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SW(*

Equipment ED No. Q1P17HV3096%. I. Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description CCW NON-SAFETY ISOLA TION Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Root Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] Ni of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI NEI UE] N/AEJ

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NE] Un N/A0' oxidation?

tYVknfQ yi-'.r

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] UE] N/A[0I1

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] UE] N/A[r (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE'NO UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 287 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofl"7 Status: YEI N1 UE3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ]D No. QIPI7HV3096B Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description CCW NON-SAFETY ISOLATION Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO- NZ'UC N/AQ Or)fq Vscl an kQAf~W o Q 'S 4Y~cj%.LA ý00-D -tc .Qm 'j\NQ. u-Sq t-0 0. ,ý,Q (ý zV6-Alw; Ak\i dmf Q~Y~r1ý ck1Q&ca ti'o~ Oldc"01Q0fal sl efl e~t 00,Q" Z>Ock Cqjj

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YUONE- ur N/A "

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? 1rd ta YE] N[E'UO N/AO

. Based on te a~iove seismic interaction evafaions, is equipment ree YIJ NO UI kW\*5 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YQ/N- U[-]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date; .' _ -, -

.- ~1~

QaL... Ill, ~ s'*Lg~ '

Page 288 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 289 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 I'

I' Page 290 of 562 L

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

-+-I --I<

Ii Page 291 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 t

Page 292 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 293 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 ofr'ý Status: Y&J NO UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP17MOV3052 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description CCW TO RCP THERMAL BARRIER ISOLATION Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 0903 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE N) of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE) NE) UE) N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE) NE UE) N/A[g/

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE) NE) UE) N/AW/

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE) NE UE N/A)

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y4NE) UrE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Entr eui cas ne fm AI.

Enter the equipment c[ass name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 294 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 W-') (-,

Sheet 2 ofXLA Status: YtZ NI" UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP17MOV3052 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description CCW TO RCP THERMAL BARRIER ISOLATION Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YIA ND UD N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yfý- NDI U N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YEJ ND LiD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YEZ N' UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[j ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: .- ' Date: .

Page 295 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 296 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

,*t Aw L-A-1: 1-') c Page 297 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 f tll1 Shee 0of3 Status: X*] N U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP17MOV31858 Equip, Class, 8 Equipment Description CCW INLET TO RHR HEA T EXCHANGER NO 2 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 83 Room, Area 12 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorne

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YOM1 ofthe 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO] NO UO N/A/

I ý') - L-It" F- ý C"kA P L) I,) f- P4 T-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO] NO U- N/AE" 7 oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO] NO UC N/Aml7

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO] NO U] NIA (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YUVNO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

/IIb LIN ( (0 ?ovj f---NT I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 298 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y[TNE] UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP17MOV3.85B Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description CCW INLET TO RHR HEAT EXCHANGER NO 2 I Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y1NC U- N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YENI-* U- N/AEI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YEN[--O UEI N/AE 10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y/ UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could 16N " U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

J'Jt4..

.,)

Evaluated by: S *% A "(4, Date: _..___ z .

g/J2-ya 2

Page 299 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

-I Page 300 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

/

She 1 of 5 Status: Yý N UF]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No, QIP17POOIB Equip. Class!

Equipment Description CCW PUMP 1B SWING PUMP Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY FloorEl. 100 Room, Area ___

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraze I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yjý/NC of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

u t( ( (- Z' /-V

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y)'*N[ U-" N/AC

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YI*N't U'- N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y"KNI" UE] N/AD]

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y/NC UC- N/AC]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YINI-I UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 301 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of5,6 Status: YEf NO] U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No, Q1P17POOIB Equip. Class' Equipment Description CCW PUMP 1B SWING PUMP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YPN/-- U0 N/AP-'

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y*/ND UD N/AD1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y9/NO0 U[" N/A 10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yk/0UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZNO U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Cgmments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: I- WAI1.& ZS: J,'40J Date: Is. Z,/, zc'/.-

I2/zJ 6

,,...1 I Page 302 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS ENPD .

DISTANCES E. f SHOULDER AND~

ART IN hAI LIMIT END FLOAT & L OIL LEVUt IN. ABOVE BOTTOM GF [OR*m FEET 0c CL Page 303 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 304 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS

'CT Dcc Page 305 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i ofy" 1 Status: Yd N[ UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP17TO01 Equip. Class' Equipment Description SURGE TANK (CCW)

Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 179 Room, Area 0 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yd 1 No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE4/NE] UD N/A[

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yd NE U) N/AC oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YC' NCI UO N/AC

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y9/N[] U[C N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO'NC UC-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 306 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Status: Y[I N[-] Ur-E Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP17TO01 Equip. Class, Equipment Description SURGE TANK (CCW)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y 1ý/NC] U[] N/AE]

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ý'N"] U'] N/AC]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NEI UO N/AC]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[f NEI UC]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE[/NC] UC]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: -')ni- 12..

I Z Page 307 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 308 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS A

I'1 S

Page 309 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 310 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 311 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 312 of 562