NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 562

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 562
ML14071A074
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/20/2014
From:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A074 (33)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 ofe Status: Y1K NM UOX'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR43T503 Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 18 STARTING AIR RECIEVER TANK Location:

Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area QM Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Andhorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yo Nil of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Reference SEWS package dated 4/12/94.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NI- U- N/AD-Y0 NEI UD- N/AD]YO ND3 UD- N/AD YO NEI UQ-] N/AD'YO Nil UD Enter the equipment class name from Appendig B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 430 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 I 4"- I~~'Sheet 2 of 3"q Status: YZ NEIJ Ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR43T503 Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 18 STARTING AIR RECIEVER TANK Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Small gap was noted between tank and cantilevered unistrut.

This was previously noted in A-46 walkdowns and determined to be acceptable.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y0 NE UQ N/AO Y0 NO UQ N/AQ Yl NO UO N/AO YI NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NO U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

(*reA WaU4)/ foV- riorn-' Se '5 W "It e9V'pf nir 421 &527.F 1- 4 t&Evaluated by: Laura aclay 1')C.Aa ý'1L(~~Terry Alan Mu~leni.'j Date: 21-Page 431 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 1:-I -Int NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 432 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS I'-- 10)NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 433 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIV47COI1B Equip. Class, 9 Status: 16U Equipment Description AUXILIARY BLDG B TRAIN BATTERY ROOM EXHAUST FAN Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 175 Room, Area 050 1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YO Ný2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yg NO UD N/AD Y&/N' UD N/ADUD N/AD YO NO UD N1A Y/ND UD IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 434 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of5 Status: Y NO] U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1V47CO12B Equip. Class, 9 Equipment Description AUXILIARY BLDG 8 TRAIN BATTERY ROOM EXHAUST FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y[d NO Ur N/A[-]Y21 NO UC-1 N/AC 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?x'r~NO UC N/AC 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yd NEI UC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[f NC UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) Or&,__N Evaluated by: Date: _ 1_a__________

W71AiJ&~/Z 1'rý Ar6"Je--hz It 7 7 c Page 435 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 436 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 437 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0... .........11h Page 438 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 e-I, 103 Sheet 1 ofY(4 Status: YIg NEJ UD--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1Y52P502B Equip. Class, 5 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN 18 FUEL OIL STORAGE TRANSFER PUMP Location:

Bldg. YARD Floor El. 155 Room, Area l)se -t_ Atvrci Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorate 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one NOI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y NEI UEC N/AlU-' N/A['Y"' NEI UEC N/AD Yý nN UCI N/AC]Y NOI UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 439 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0* ýa r3 Sheet 2 Of -" Status: N[-] U[i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No, QIY52P502B Equip. Class, 5 Equipment Description DIESEL GEN 1B FUEL OIL STORAGE TRANSFER PUMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YR NO U" N/AD YV NO UD N/AD Y[. ND UD N/AD1 YP NDl UD]Other Adverse Conditions 11, tlave you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y1 ND UFD1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) ma. f- ,-&,,t. $ ?A¢ 4 4.01%k ~ ~ -~~~~Evaluated by: 4"AZ.A caj~xn mdku Date: q/tlk/ -z.o C. La-">\T-V-zw A 4M ýjj -I \&*~\ tA 2.~Page 440 of 562 I ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 441 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 5.Page 442 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 443 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0/Page 444 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 3i Status: Y[g'N7] U7]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSH11NGEPB2508 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description EMERGENCY POWER BOARD Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE'] N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y[2'NEI UEI N/A[J YE'NEJ UE] NIAQ 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[&NE' U- N/AE]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

TliF-ýZ PAckAtj& Pop- -TS PAO)EL iWASý: 4T Ad)Atl.A ý-6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NE] U[] N/AR1 YYNEI UF]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 445 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 jeabt j lV Sheet 2 of 3 if, Status: Yij N[] u[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OSHIINGEPB2508 Equip. Class, Equipment Description EMERGENCY POWER BOARD Interaction Effec 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YO NO U- N/A]Y[d NO U[ N/AD YRJ NO UD N/AO 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NO U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

M, f.-t 4 4 OF T'H($f -& t T5~T A 'A 3"ý1 wtM'VL YWcIk PL.AI ý iThE PLA? J4iT t~ 4 L~WJo týL [ PO T AUtoJL) PE7M AL~4 0 F 'T-t4iZ7 To 0c;~t itt i" 't!F .,fVA 0 )d t V--Date: Evaluated by: K A~ %~~';j&$AtA xt AQ I ý9'.Page 446 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPI-01, VERiSIuN /.U F1- Ioq It Sheet 3 of Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Status: Y[Z NEJ UL] jtjj($Equipment ID No. QSH1 1NGEPB2508 Equip. Class2 20*

Description EMERGENCY POWER BOARD... 2 ., i t~f [ >: I c'- TH,<LT (',pt)!L.Lit

{7. .. "r-12 :.,,"7 'iv 10 r~-1P -4 t ~ L4.r I /TE6VI A A1Yk tj P 7- 1ma'026%~t Note: Wk~i W &F LW 3UJQ U'5E otj j4 trPL-6,oo' P50tsowts WvrR -3.-YVAO 0~ 0 HT 01 ~jWoMM U D0 TtI4: Q0A-16WAU jo§ sj~!L dUIRldlO&P$

-1 10 60 It OJV t.%I 1 T3 15 UOLL~e-t, 1HP~t TNF ipeee< LPC-t2-..;i-N S 15V Ab E.? ty rMAE VTUA0V AOt L 0 0r R ,E ONYVAN4 -Q'z Note: Note: Page 447 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0-U a Page 448 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 449 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 450 of 562 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 451 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 452 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 453 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 454 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 455 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 456 of 562 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 457 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 458 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 459 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 I Page 460 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 461 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 L Page 462 of 562

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-14-0249,_Joseph_M._Farley,_Unit_1,_Enclosure_2,_Updated_Farley_Unit_1_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic_Through_Attachment_3_Page_430_of_562_Through_462_of_562&oldid=1046263"