ML12355A781
| ML12355A781 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 11/26/2012 |
| From: | Miktus P Southern Nuclear Operating Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NL-12-2266 SNCF164-RPT-01, Ver 1.0 | |
| Download: ML12355A781 (37) | |
Text
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 0, 77
.4eý'Y~St~
S heet 1ofS Status: YE2.N[ U[]
Seismic.Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIHIINGB2504J Equip, CiassJ EquipmentDescription BOP INST RUMENTATION CAB,
+
Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor:El. 155 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
InstrUctions for Completinig Checklist This ch*ceklist may be used to document the results of the. Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record~the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space,.is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
I. Is the anchi6lage conifiguration verification requited (i.e., is the item one Y
N'NO of the 50% of SWELitems requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the'ancli6fiige free of bent, broken, missing.or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that: is more than mild surface oxidation?
YE(/ND ulD N/AD Y"1 ND UD N/AD
- 4. Is the anchorage.free ofvisible:cracks in the concrete near-the anchors?
Y
ý!ND-- UD-N/AD]
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question, only applies if the item is one of the.50% for which:an anchorageconfiguratibn verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y2T'ND UD N/AD]
YGIIND liD-Enter the equipment class name from:Appendix'B: Classes of£ EruipmenL Page 104 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet2 oirx Ytts Y~NEU IL-37 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment !D N0o Q, 1HtlNGB2504J EquipClass, Equipmentt Description BOP INSTRUMENTATION CAB, Ihteraction Effects
- 7. Are. softltargets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead.equipm.enti,.dis:ribution systems; ceiling !iles arid lighting, and masonry block:walls, not likei, to collapsre onto the equipment?
- 9. Do, attached lines have adequate flexibility, to avoid daamage?
Y4EKJ' UO rVAM, Y~aNCI _VD 1N/AF.
YE*'NEJ U.EJ N/A.EJ
'106 Based on theabove seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?:
Other Adverse Conditions 11, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could' adyersely-affect the safety ftiactions of the equipment?
ydJNO Tin Conminent (Additional pages may b& added asn recessary)
Evaluated by.
LJ Date:
8
/*Z
__I Page 105 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION ql Page 106 of 561
OACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 107 of 561
ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION.010 Page 108 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0
- Hb Sheet I ofN 375 0 Status: YZ NEI IJUE li Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipmnent ID No.,QH11NGNIS2503A Equip. Class,.20 Equipment.Description NIS Excore DetectorCabinet Location': Bldg. Aux, Floor El. 155' Room, Area
__÷ Manufacturer-Model,. Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructiots for Completing Chiecklist This checklist may be used todocument the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space bebw eac.iof the following questions may be used to record the resu1taof judgmen/ts and findings. Additional space, is provided at the end of this check li.t for documenting other cbmi Iiients.
Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verificationrequired (i.e., is the iteriione of the 50% Of sWEL items teIquiringsuch ved fication)?
YZ0 NOD
- 2. Is the.anchorage free of bent, broken, missingor loose hardware?
13 Is the anchorage freeýof corrosion that'is more than nild surface oxidation?
4.ý Is the anchorage:free of visible crk.cks in.the concrete near thle anchors?
- 5. Is the.achorage c.onfiguration consistent with plaint documentation?
(Note: This qcu.ti.on o0nyja!.ies if the itemjis. one of the,50% for which an anchorage configuriition verificifion is.required.),
Anchorage configUrations were verified against the configurations of SEWS for QI1i NGNIS2503A and Q2Hi.I ! NGNIS2503A.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y-0 NO It] N/At]
YO NO] UO N/AD YZI Nt,Ut] N/AD YZ.N]
UM. N/AD YENn Ut]
Onter ihe equipinentelass a ama Y+oznAppendix.0 :Ctnsses of Equipment:
Page 109 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 F) -3 ?
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Sheet 2'of/ 6 status: Yo NE7 Uý11411 Equipment IDNo. QItI iNGNIS2SO3A
- Equip. Ctasst 20 Equipment Description NIS Excore Detector Cabinet.
Interaction EffecLs
- 7. Are softtargets free from impact by nearby equipment-or structures?
Y0D NEI UC l/AO 8; Are overhead equipment, distribution systemnsr ceiling tilesand lighting YE, NC UJC N/AC
.and masonry block Walls not Iik6lyto collapse 6nto the:equi-n ent?
9.. Do attached lines have adeqatte f Ixibiliy,to avoid damage'..
- 10. Based n the aboye seismnicinteractich evaluations, is equipmentfr'e of potentially adverse sei-inic interaction.effects YE NC utC N/AC YO NC UC, Other Adverse Conditions 1,1. Have you looked for and found no Other eismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
YZ NC uC CommentS (Additional pagesinay hO addet! as necessary)
Evaluated by: Stebh~n Yuan K
k.v..
Evaluaed by Ste6in Yua Paul Alikttev 08-21-12 Page 110 of 561
0
- ACHMENT 3
- SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.10 Page 111 of 561
ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF1 64-RPT-01, VERSION 1
Page 112 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIOP n
Page 113 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet. 1of;- /I Status: Y{
NE **EU SeismiCc Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment.iI) Nou.
QHIWINGPIC2505C Equip. Clas '. 20 Equipment Description Process Protection Cabinet.Channel 3 Location:1 Bldg. Aux-Floor El, 155' Room, Area Manufacturer, NModel, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructionsforf. Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document. the i.sults ofthe Seismic Walkdown"ofan iteml f equipmnent o1h, the S WEL. The Space below ea6ch of the folowingqbes'tions may'be used to record Ihe rLsfflts oSf judgments'and findings. Additional space:is providedat the endof thischecklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage I., ]s-the anchorage configuration verification required (ie., is the item one Yo ND
ýof the 50% of SWEL items requiing such veriticat'on)?
2-Is the'anchorage free of bnont,.broken, missing orboose hardware?
3., Is the ancorage free of orrolsijon that is more:
than mild. surface.
oxidation?
YN ND UrD N/AD YZ ND UD N/AD,
- 4. isthe anchorage frepe of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?'
Y0 ND UD.N/AD
- 5. Is the!anchorageconfiguration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This questiomn.lnly applies.if tht ite i i*
- e of th& 50% for whid", ah nnchioraP.c~nfigutati verification i'r qoired.)
Anchorage con figirations were verified against the configurations in SEWS toi Q -1H1t NGPiC2505C, 1 Hl*-f NG PIC25O5H and 0 1 1 INGSSP2506,.
- 6. Based onthe above anchorage'evaluations, is the ancho0rage free of poten iiaily adverse seismicconditiotisl YZ NEI UO NtAD YZ ND CDY Eiter the.- euipme it cltas-iaSne from Appnidix B: Casses of Equipment, Page 114 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Slheet 2of f*
Stat is: YE NE UV]ý Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentiD No. QH1MNG-PIC2505C Equip. Class. 20 Eq0ipiment Dejscription. PIrocess Protection Cabint channel 3 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structuivs?.
YZ N[] IjQ N/A[]
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distiibution systeMs, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[9 N[] UO NWAD and: masonry bjlck walls not likely tq coilmaps onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attaclied ines have adequtie flexibility to avoid'damage?
YO Ni U["1 NAEI
- 10. Based on the ab&velseisinic interaction evaluations, is couiphient free YR Nn UM of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other AdverseConditions 11U-Hae you looked foirand found no other seismic conditions thait could Y0 N3 U-adversely affect th,16safety ifunctions ofthe equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evitfo*uc1 by: Paul Miktus Steohen Yuan Iv t
Date: 08-2112 03.21-12,
/
it Page 115 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONRO TI Page 116 of 561
- ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 117 of 561
OACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.
(,
Page 118 of 561
ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONP Page 119 of 561
A CHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 120 of 561
- ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION.0 Page 121 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION.0 C'.
Page 122 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 CA Page 123 of 561
ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION.10 Page 124 of 561
3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 125 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS
)
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 S:heet i of Status:. YE NM Ufl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIHi11NGPIC2505F Equip. Class' 20 EquipmentIDc. criptio, Process,ontrof Cabinet, ChanneIl2 Location: Bldg. Aux Floor EL l55!
Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc (optional but recommended) instructi6ns for Completing Checklist This checklist may be. used.t0 document the results of the Seismic WalkdoWn of n iiitem of equipm'ent oi3 the SWEL, The space below each of the folloiwing questions may be used to record the results ofjudgmeits ahd findings. Additional space is provided at the end.of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage con figuration verification rmqujred;(i'e,, is the item one YS ND o.f the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken,,missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of conosion that is inore than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of isible cracks in the c0ncrete~hear theanchors?
- 5. Is. the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is. one of the 50% for which an anchor ge configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage configuratfions were verified against the configurations in SEWSfor QHI H1NGPIC2505F, Q1-I. 1NGPIC2505H and 01W 1NGSSP2506J.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluatioas, is theanchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YN ND UD'I N/AD Yo ND.UD: N/AD YED ND UDI N/AD YN ND UD1 N/AD YN ND UD Enter thelequipment c]-Ass pame firom Appendix B: Classes of Eqiijpmeh.tt Page 126 of 561
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 0'
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)ý EquipmentflDNo. QiHI 1NGPIC2505F Equip. Classý FquipmentLDe:scription Pr'ocess.Co.ntrol:Cabinet;Chanrh Shetu: 2 ofY,3 ' 15' ems Sta~tus:. YZ NO y00 Pftll
~l2 Interaction Effects
- 7. Aie soft targets free from impact by nearby ieqiptniit st ructures?
YZ NOJ UEJ N4AD
- 8. Arfe o'Vefhid d4u*ipiner diS' b""t-ii
'Isyst~i-ns;:ei g tils and' ighting
'Y* No EUO N/AT and masonry block walls notlikely (ocollapse Onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damnage?
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaitiatiotni.sis: euitmeneit fiee of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects?
Y[
NE:n uE1 NWAC YZ NCI UF Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you ltokeddfogr and found no oiherseismnic conditions thlat:could, adversely affect the.safety fUnfictiosofstheequipirpent?
Y, Nn tiE Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary).
Evaluated'by:: Paul Miktus!,
Stenheh Yuan C
(
.7
/
Date: 08-21-12.
08-2:1-2,.
ZZ Page 127 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 9
!.C 0
/i.
"4 4>
,?:)
- Page 128 of 561
9ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 9
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0
/\\
0-Page 129 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION #
Page 130 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION
.010
-TI
'p Page 131 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 v
Page 132 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION.
0
-tl I
Page 133 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION.4#
Page 134 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 TI Page 135 of 561
9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONRO Page 136 of 561
AC*IIENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 137 of 561
O ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIOP "N
Page 138 of 561
A ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 139 of 561
S ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 140 of 561