ML13004A260

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3, Page 373 of 467 Through Attachment 3, Page 431 of 467
ML13004A260
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Miktus P
Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Southern Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2267 SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0
Download: ML13004A260 (59)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 is She t I.ofN,4 U

Status. Y NM uW Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No. Q2R21LOO1D Equip. ClassX 14 Equipment Description VITAL AC DISTRIBUTION PANEL 2D Iocation: Bldg. AU.)ILIARY Floor Fl., 139 Room ,Area Manufacturer, M1del, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the S&ismic Walkdown of an item of eluipment on the, SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and fidings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist, for docume ting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification requiired (i.e., is the item one Yd N[

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verificationS? &: x

2. Is the anchorage five of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yo1 Nfl U] N/AC 3, Is the anchorage lie.of corrosion that is iiore than mild surface Y!NEI UNON/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchoriage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?' YO Nn UO N/AO
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent withplant documentation? YONEI Ufi N/AD (Note: This~qUestion only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is.required,)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage fleeof Y/OU potentially adverse seismic conditions?

!Enter the equipincat class nane front Appendix B: Classes offiqtlpnienIt.

Page 373 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Status: 'Yd'N1 U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmcntID No. Q2R21LOOID 'Equip. Class, 14 Equipmdnt Dese rp )on VITAL AC DISTRIBUTION PANEL 2D ._.._

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets fiee from impact by nearby equipment or stru.ctures YdI NE] UE, NWAE]ý
8. Are overhiead equipmeit, disixibuijon systemn, coiling tiles and lighting, YE NE] uEN/AE]

and masom-yblock walls ristlikely to col aps.e:oto, the eqiipinent?

9-Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yd NE] UC] N/AE]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is'equipment free Y8'NE] UEI of potentiaily adverse, seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1, 1-Have you looked for and foundno other seismic conditions that could Y"No U0I adversely affect the safety fimctions of the equipment?

Commnents (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Eviluated by: ____"___ -_N.

__J__ ýQ- Dte: 238 Ptr'n Piro 1A ki Page 374 of 467

z 0

V5 w

LU CNF 0

n-,

z 02 z

to cv a

w- a-C,,)

w r

0 I--

z w

"1"

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 376 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of137 StatmSi: YE* NE* Uo Seismic Walkdown Checklist {SWC)

EquipmentID No. Q2R36A50.0 Equip. Class, 3 Equipment Description. 4,16KV SWITCHGEAR 2K SURGE ARREST OR Location! Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area -V2 A ___

Manufacturer, Model, Etcý (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may beused to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space be ioW each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and, finding , Additional space is pro-ided at the end of this dhecklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.c., is the item one of~the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchoragefree of bent, broken,omissing or loose hardware? YOJ NM1 UN1 N!AO 3 Is the anchorage ftee of corrosion that is more than mild surface YOl NOl U1, NIAOj oxidation?

4, Is theanchoragefree of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YOl NOl LIM NIAEJ

,' is ithe anihorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YOJ NMl t -ý N/AQ

'(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for Which al anchorage configuraton veriiation is required.)

44

6. Based on theabove anchorage evauations, is the anchorage free of YO NO UJ potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter thbcquipincflt class nare .from`Appendix B: Chssuslof Equipmctcn, Page 377 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of`

Status: Y*] NE] Ut Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ]D No. 02R36A501 Equip. Class' 3 Equipment Descript6o. 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR 2K SURGE ARRESTOR Interactioni Effects

7. Are soft targets free from~impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yo~ Nfl] UEI N/AEl
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NCI VEI N/AO and masonmy block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y% NEI UE N/!tE

.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations; isequipment free Y9 NEIUE1 of potentially adverse seismic iiiteraction effects?.

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found noother seismic conditions that could YS NI uDE adversely affect the safety fanctions of the equdipment?

Comments (Additional pajges may be added as necessary) 1;,.~htta~

I~~LWA&~t~ 105 c~ ac-cjc-Evauated y:tv.- ,2 Luv& V. viid Date: 'Y2-q/j

!* .tA Page 378 of 467

A 0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 379 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 380 of 467

A 0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 381 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 S2- Db Sheet 1 of Status: g N E U[I Seismic Walkdilwn Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R41LOOIA Equip. Class, 14 Equipment Description 15VDC DISTRIBUTION PANEL 2A Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155' Room. Area 471 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO Nýý of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEýNFO UD N/AQ

,~ ~- ~r oq. o~U_ ýc- psV-."&. r'.4 Si..,c  ; 4-.

Le uvi - S4c.4-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y O "N N oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YeND UO N/AQ
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NE UD N/Af (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y)2 NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

AEnter t p ss ne fVro oapny Cesr- 4f.,

Euipment. 1. fGe IEnter ihe equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 382 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2-Status: NEI U'-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R41LOOIA Equip. Class, 14 Equipment Description 15VDC DISTRIBUTION PANEL 2A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YNI'NO UO N/AQ1
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yg NE UD N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YýNjI-- UD N/AQ
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YONDI Uff of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZEND UD adversely affect the safety functions ofthe equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N** c¢vrse P' - 16','

  • Awe, Q~r F2 - L4I Evaluated by: 119,ute 1-kar to Date: ,cJd n.L'/,
  • p

-7Z 6, Yi,,. U. J (9 2~ Ii-Page 383 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSIONO0 1.0 Page 384 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 385 of 467

E ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 386 of 467

A 0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 387 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 388 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 389 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Pz- I (

Sheet 1 of 3 Status: y[-R Nn UF-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. Q2R42B522A Equip. Class, I8 Equipment Description UNIT 2 SERVICE WATER BATTERY FUSE BOX Location: Bldg:.WIS Floor El 188 Room, Area- - -

Manufacturer, ModeI, Etc. (optional: but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space isprovided at the enddof this checklist for d6cumnftinig otherhommenitS.

Anchoraje

1. Is the anchorage configu'ration verification required (i.e., is the item one YIj1 NE]

verification)?

of the 50%. ofSWEL items. requiring such 2, Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or'loose hardware?

I NOI UEO N/A-

3. Is the anchorage free ofcorrosion that is more than. mild surface YN]NO UO N!AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage freeof visible cracks in the concretenear the anchors? Y NO UC N/AO 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yr[ NO U[O N/AE]

(Note; Tlbs queston only applies ifthe item isone of the 50% lbr which an anch orage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on th'e above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y*D uC3 YVNO UhO potentially adverse .eismic conditions?

Emrtecquiprn~et class wisnieiromsAppeiidix B: Cla ssbof Euptm Page 390 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YW ND Uo Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R42B522A -Equip. Cl'assl 18 _________

Equipment Description L B1UZ0YLMWYATER BATTERY FUSE BOX Interaction Effects

7. Are soft tnrgets free from impact'bypnearby equipment or structures?

Y NO U.1 N/AI

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NO U- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? J\

9.. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility.to avoid damage? YoND .U[ N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y* NE-I U0]

of p~tentially'adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Haveyou looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Ylý ND U[

adversely affect the safuty function- of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be a.dded as necessary)

&-~w VVovII,\ "s kr~ck i ~ - ~vlYo Ev' bated oy: AA LrlUftj M~ Date: a C.

Page 391 of 467

A 0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 392 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of/

Status: , 1 TIUL]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. Q2R42EOOIA Equip. Class_.1.66_.................... ..

Equipment Description BATTERYSCHARGER 2A ._._. .......

ocation: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results.of the Seismic Watkdowýn of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the foll6w7ihg questions may be used'to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments..

Anchorage I., Is the anchorage configuration verificationrrequired (i.e., is the item one Yý Nfl of the 50/% of SWEL itemsrequiring such verification)?

G)a-ka - Poý~

-:(-:: cut-

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y6No ULI NIAfl
3. Is the'ancharage free of corrosion that is more than miild sufface Yfý N`17 UMEJ N/A oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near theanchors? YE' NE UEI N/AD 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with. phmt documentationi? Y4IND] UkI. N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6: Based on ltheabove archoorge evaluations, is theanchorage free of IuD potentiallyadverse seismic conditions?

'Fcnthcltiee iprener tlss nmie iom .Appeidix B:Claasos of Eqipmnent, Page 393 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Status: U0D Seismic, Walkdqw n Checklist (SWC)'

Equipment ID No.. Q2R42E001A Equip. Class' 16 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGER 2A...... __.. _..

Interaction Effects

7. Are. soft targets fiee from impact by nearby eqtipmrcnt: orstructres? . . NC UC NAC 8ý Arebyerheadjequipment, distribution systems, eilihgtileaiihd lightinig, 4~NC EtinNIAEJ and masonry block Walls not likely to col1apse ontoithe eqiimeni?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flxkibiiity-to avoid damage? YE~'NO UEJ NWAD 10., Based on the abov*.Seisinic.interactiofi evaluations, is equipment.frec YE2/NE] uIEJ of potentially adverse sisniic intedracti6fo effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and' foundno, other.eisric conditions that could Yd(NEI UMI adversely affect the. gafdty functions dfithie.equipment?,

Comments (Additional pages may be added 'nccessary)

Evaluated by: N -*, . *. *::* q*, .. Date: z___ _1 _

Page 394 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS O NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 395 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 r *-I I P,%

Page 396 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of/ 5j* 7g Status: YZ NE] U-] sjjoj1*

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

.Equipment, ID No. 02R42EQ02B Equip. Class' Equipment Description Bat B 4ocation: Bldg. AquBdq__ Floor El, 121' Room, Area 2212 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional hut recornmended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the ScismicWalkdonn of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the:resutfs of judgments.Iid findings. Additional ptape is provided at the end of this-checldist for d0cumenting other cdinnuents.

Anchorage

'I. Is theanchorage configuration verificatiori requiredi(i.e.. is the item one Yo No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchoraige free of bentaLbroken; missing or loose hardware? YO.Nn UFJ NIAO7
3. Is the anchoragefreebf corrosion that is more than.mild surface Y0 N0110I NhAEI oxidation?
4. Is the ahorage ffeeof visiblecracks in~the concrete nearthe anchors? Y0 Nil UO N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistentrwith plant documentation? Y[ NQ Un N/AO (Note: This question oniyapplies if the item-is onQ of the 50% for which an anchorage configatotion verification is required.)

Anchorage in field matches plant documentation. Plant configuratfon was obtained from SEWS watkdown performed for this component.

The SEWS package from 7/3/93 shows that battery rack Is welded to embedded steel. The weld configuration in the field was confirmed to be as shown and evaluated in the SEWS package. See pages.elIf for view of'batiery rack and typical weld.

Euller tie isiuun rn p Ciacees of Equuipomeuu uehBimu Page 397 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4'5 Status: YN, NUI UO At.

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment.'ID No. 0 2R42E0O2B Equip. Class. 15 Equipment Description Batterv2B

6. Based on the aibove anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y9 N1 Uri, potenliall adverse:seisMic conditions?

Inteiaction Effects 7z Are soft targets~free~fromimpact by nearby eq~ipmnnt or structures? YZ NO LIE] N-/A1-81 Are overhead.equipmentt, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YR NEI UE N/A[]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The room has block walls-on three sides. Based on a review of drawingD-206508, Revision,20and Report FTGOC-002, these walls have been seismicallyanalyzed and supported as ie(ruired. Therefore, there is no potential seismic interaction.

9; Do attacIhed lints have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NO Uli NIAE 10, Based on ,the above se ismic interactioinevaluations, is equiprnentfree YZ NO LUI of. poteitialI ytdvetse spismic irti ntiofh effects?

Other Adverse Conditions L, Have you looked for and found no other seisfic eonditionýs that could YfM NEI U .

.adversely affect the safety fqictfiOns of theleqUipfnenr?

Comments (Additional pages may.be addled asnecessary).

None Page 398 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 45 710 Sheet 3 ofr Ev,,iuated by: P. Mku 'Date: 08-23-12 S, Yuan ..... 08-'23-12 3t-I Page 399 of 467

A 0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 400 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSIONO0 1.0 Page 401 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 3 Staus: YI ND UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment D No: Q2R43A505 Equip, Class'. 17 Equipment Description DJES_.L..GE*NERATOR 28 (.SKID)

Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area "

Manufacturer, Model' Etc: (optional but recommended)

Instructibns for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the resultsof the Seismic Walkdo*n of an item of equipment o0 the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is. provided at the end of this cheecklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. is the anchorageconfiguration verification required,(ie., is the item one YINE1.

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage .free of bent broken, missing or loose hardware?

Yq NE UD N/AO

3. Is the anehorage free of Corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks~in the concr-ete near the anchors? Yt NM UlE NIN-AE
5. I, the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y NED UE N!/AE (Note:This question only applies if the item isone of the 50% for which an achorage configuration verification is reiUircd.)
6. Based on (he above anchorage evaluations, isthe anchorage free of Y NEO iE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equiipment cltam name fromtAppendlix B: Clttsscs of Equipmenit.

Page 402 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3

Status: Y. NDE]U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R43A505 Equip. Class' 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 2B:(SKID)ý InteractionEffects.

7. Are softf tagets free fi-6nmiipact by nearby equipment or structures?

I NO U[1 N/AE]

8. Are overhead .equipment, distribution systems, ceiling~tiles and lighting, YI NE UJ N/AE and masonry block walls not likely~to~coilaps~e onto. theequipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y ýND Un N/AJ M, Based on the above seismicinteraction evaluations, is equipment free  %.NEI UM of potentially adverse, seismic.interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have youlooked for and found no othlr.seismic conditions that could NEI tEIE adverseiy-affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Addiltibnal'pages, may be add ed as n6cessary)

Nr,ý ov cr-r,1-WiTh %ak-b eqApn ht 0 hAz (rz2i Evaluated  ?

'* ,/ Tz - Date:2?Ž Page 403 of 467

A 0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 404 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of/5 Status: Yr] NZ U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R43EOOIB Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description SEQUENCER B2G Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 2229 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0z NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

f ""W e~c-"tc SF:w' I;rxct'uj dacite "-I-1-*

93 ,

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YK NEI UD N[f-

"Ids, t: S) 9 r)

3. Is the anchorage free of CorTosion that is more than mild surface Y0 ND UD N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO UF- N/AD 0mmrn concretecrack in SEWS package could not be located. A very small crack runs in the same location but it is nearly imperceptible, therefore, ok. 1"he. 'ew -S pa~cto4 c& c..ot"c6iudcs "t~v-Ir'e cllsd4ý Chou_(3yw t Qiu R-& C'VCA-iJV
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y0 NDI UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0 NDI UDI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEntev the equipmeicfietss~ nams from Appendix S: Claosses of Equipment.

Page 405 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 20f/

Statu's: -YE]

NSI UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment1DNo. 02R43E01B.. Equip, Class' 20 Equipment Description SEQUENCER 82G Interaction Effects,

7. Are soft targets freefrom impact:by nearby equipment or structures? YE 'NZ lIE N/AE Heavy metal tool is hanging from a 4 long rodnext to cabinet Q2R43E0.1B and could act similar to a pendulum in a seismic event and swing,into cabinet or completely fall from wall into the cabinet.

Revise wall fastenerto ensure tool is secure.

.8 Are:overhead:equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE UO NIAE and masoniy block valls riot likely to ciC011pseontoeth eqtiipuient?

9. Do attached lines have aclquate flexibility to avoid damaage? YZ NO, UC NIAE
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipmyent free Y- NEI UO of potentially adverse selsmibinteraction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 11.. Have you.looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO U.0 adversely affect the:safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pageshiiay be~added ii necessary)

~ oL,2 CI~S &W C4' c' 1c,rie t ~t w v i k Xl et c ~~ i Evaluiitcd by:

,at Page 406 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 407 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 408 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 409 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0

-I Sheet 1 oft-Status: N*IN U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02R43EO02A Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description SEQUENCER B2FAUX PANEL Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139' Room, Area 2343 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YONO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO'N-' UO N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yyf NO UO NIAO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y,J0 NE UO N/AO
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YJDNO UO N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YgNO UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 410 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0

-7 Sheet 2 oft- '.1, Status: Y, NF-] U'-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2R43EO02A Equip. Class, Equipment Description SEQUENCER B2FAUX PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YM'NE- UI'- N/AED YONO UO N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO'NO UD N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yff NO UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0NO UOI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

%,,>,,- -s rc

44. Abe~

Evaluated by: Rs.,, \-\a.LrFa 4~441- Date: fhs' I0 .

7~A7/ov VA.'i¶; ~ _____

Page 411 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 412 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 413 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 414 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 415 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 416 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of/4 Status: 1PNEU Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No. Q2R43EQ02Q Equip; Equipment Description, fEQUE, R 82G c AUX RELAY PANEL Location; Bldg- AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Rooms, Area L _

Mvanufacturer,,Model, Etc, (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist Ths checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the.

SWEL, The space below each of the follotiing questions may be used to record the results hfjudgmients and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

.Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.eis the item-one Yq NDl Of the 50% ofSWEL, items reqiting such verification)?

2, Is,the anchorage free ofbent, broke , missing or loose hardware? YNl NEI UD N/AQ

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YU NEI tii W/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible, cracks in the concrete near the anchorS? YX NEI UEI N/AO-I.Istie:atichorage configuration cdt*sistent with plantFdocumentation? Y)4 NE UD N!A[3 (Note: This question only applies if the iternuis one of'the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verfication is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorageevaluations, is the anchorage .free 6f AVN'1 ti potentiallyadverse seismic conditions?

Enter fthe qiprnwn*cleass ranw ftorn Apetidix 8. Chu'sesPf Eiuijanwnt, Page 417 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 ofXý Status:I "N[D UFJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentiD No, 02R43EO025 Equip. Class Equipment Description SEQUENCER B2G AUX RELA,' "PANEL Interaction Effects 7, Are soft targets free fromiimpact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[A: N[ 'UC] NIAJ S. Are overhead equipment, distribution systemsý-cetm'W1es and lighting, 1/2[* N. UMr' AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? LtA 9ý Do attached lines have adequate:flexibility-to avoid damage? YdNE] UO N/,AE]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YQ11NEI UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse C(nditions

11. Have you looked.fof and found no other sei~fisic conditions that could -V NE] UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additioinal pgds may be addgd as necessary)

Evaluated by:.. Th*.. UtAV KAclciG\ Date: fr

-~ _ -

Page 418 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 10 II 4A Page 419 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 420 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0

,aSheet I ofv -I Status: YM* Nn* Un-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)ý Fquipment [D No. QSY4IC5O7D Equip. Class ,9 Fu!pipment Deiription O-G RM2BSEXHAUST FAN Location: Bldg. DESEL Floor,E E 177" Room.Arca 59 _ _

M1anufacturer, Model, Etc. :(option.a but reit:cmmrended).

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checkist nay be used to docurnen the results of theSe ismic Walkdown o*. nite ý ,of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each- of the fotlowing questlions inmty b used tocre ord h rcstults'bfjtidgments and findings. Additioni spacesprvdei [the :nd ofrthis ch cklist:for d~cumenti g other comments:

Anrichrage L. Is tie anchtvagdi cofigiralioni vorification rtqtiired fi.e-, is the item one YZ ND of the 50% of SWEL itenis rdquirig such verific tion)?

2.. lthe 6inchorhge free Of bent, 6rbken, missing or loose hardware? YZ ND UD N/AD 3; Is:the:arichor.ge free, of corrosion that s,inmre. than niild surface Y0 ND UD N/AD-oxidation?

4, Is the anchorage fiee of visible crack*sin the concrete.near the anchors?, YO ND UD N/ADl

5. Is th* anchorag c onfigzurati*ai consistent with plant docun enttition? Y0 ND UD N/AD (Nbte: This question only applies if theiten is one of the 50% for which hn anchorage configUration'v*rification is mquired,)

Refer to drawing D- 170338; Rev. 10 6, Based,on the above machorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y "NDI UD potentially.idv.sl gi m clonditions?

Ematrhe equipmrncts ntsame firorr A ppeii()x-Bý tla~sss of Uqwpiipmcdi.

Page 421 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ir- lon Sheet 2Yov[,U Status: YX )ND VLJ Seismic Walkdown Checkli,st (SWIC)

Equipmvnt,ID No. QS'Y4fC57D . Equip. Classj 9 Equipment Description DGO RM 28 EXHAUST FAN ": U Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets freefriom impact by.nearby iequipment 6isItructures? Y0 NEI UO- N/AC1 8'. Are overtheaddeqUipment,.distributiontste ms, Ceiliig tile.s and lighting, Y0l NO UC] N/A]

and masonry block.walls not likely to colaipse ontothe equipment?

9. Do a ached llines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NCb UC N/AO
10. Based on the above seisiti ihteractionegaltiations,is equipipmentfifree YO NEI' .V of potettially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse ConditiOnS

11. Have yodt looked for apnd found no other seisnticconditions ihat could Y9 NE] UO adverselyaffect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additiatpa&es may be added asnecessary)

Evaluated b.ý; I' I A.L t"li ~ ~ L Date ' 21 T6/ 17.

'tO 2.

CLL Page 422 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS is NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 423 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 424 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 jL-,ot Page 425 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0

(

Page 426 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 7

Page 427 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheeti-1 of 32/

status: Y, ND LTUFJ?

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QSY41M542D Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description DG RM 28 INTAKE LOUVER MOTOR' Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 'Room, Area ,

Manufacturer, Model, Et&'(opf ona] butr, 'eontnnded)________ . .

InstruCtions for Cdmpletinlg Checklist ThischccldiStmayt b used to doc ent the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an itefin f equipment on tle SWEL, The space below each of the following questions mdy be used to record the results ofjudgments and.

findings. Additional space is provided at theend of this checklist fdr'documeotiug other comments.

Anchorace I. Is the anchorageconfigration verification required: (i.e., is the item one Y5] NO, of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchoragefree Of bent, brolkn- missing or loose hardware?

YoNQ~ UQ NWAFD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that~is more than riild surface oxidation?
4. is thebrhehorago free oof visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? -gNO UO N/AD 5, Is theanchorage configurafion consistent with plant documentation? 1% NF UrN/A~i (Note: This question only applies if the itiem is one of the 50% for which ai anchorage configuration. ivifiewtion is required.)
6. Based on the:.bove anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free 6f YV NOJ UO pOtentially adverse seismic. cotiditions?

Enter the ~uipVnent rIca name timt Appendix B,.Ctns es o/ .quipmu t.

Page 428 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 ofZ0 Status: YP N[W] UD3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment )DNo. QSY41M5420 Equip. Class, 0-Equipment Description DG RM 28 INTAKE LOUVER MOTOR.

Interaction Effects 7., Are soft targets.free forom impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yd NEI UE- N/AEJ

8. Are overhead equipmenut distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NEI U1J N/AJ and masonn, block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoiddamage? YSý NO UE N/AEI
10. Based on the above seismric interaction evaluations, is equipment free YgNEI UE ofpotential.ly adverse'seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions H. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE13INCI UQ adversdly affect the safety fimetions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by;: ~A(AC

( W P IAIA~ A ~l\ Date: ei 4?Ji q 2 4L/k41E'!.

Page 429 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 430 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 431 of 467

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13004A260&oldid=2520877"