ML13004A257

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Farley Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3, Page 232 of 467 Through Attachment 3, Page 306 of 467
ML13004A257
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Miktus P
Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Southern Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2267 SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0
Download: ML13004A257 (75)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Shee 2Of 3 Statuts:

ýNM'ULJ Seisrmic Walkdown CheckIist JSWC)

Equipment D No: Q2N23FI3229CB Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description. FEEDWA4TERNTAKEýFLOWINDICATION_.

Interaction Effects 7ý Ae esoft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or.structures?

Y3 o Ul N/AEJ

8. Are overhead equipment,distributi*n systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, V O UE] N/AF]

and masonry block-walis.not likely to, collapse onto 'the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Y&NO U0] N/Al]

10. Based on the above seismic iiteractionecvaluations; is equipment free

¥ I

U0 of pote.ntially adverse seismici.nteraction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked forandfouvnd no other seis ic conditions that:cPuld

ý/Nu'*

U1'0 adyeret) affect the safety functios s.of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages maybe added'as necessary)

E'/aliatcd by:

DatA: e.z, 2O/-

F_

8.7 Page 232 of 467

AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 233 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0

.Sheet i. of 3 Status:

&NF U,

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02N23FT3229B Equip, Class' 18 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER FLOW TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY IFloor'El. 100 Room, Area 2-k (-

Manufacturer, Model, Etc, (optional but recommendied)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings: Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documentiig~other caOunents.

Anchorage

1. Is the archorage configuration verification required (ice., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring:such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage: free, of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more~than.mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configurationconsistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the itemniS onedof the 50% for X-hich an anchorage configLration verificationis required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO N--

LN J UJ N!AE]

YV'NO UIJ N/AEJ Y3*NC1 UO3 NJA[

YP1NO UE1 N/AE YE] NO UE3 N/Ai Y

/NUO u Enter the equiprnriet class narnefroin Appendix 13: ChsssesofEquipiiioit Page 234 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmnentIDNo.

,Q2N23FT3229Bý Equip. Class, 18 EquipmentDescription AUX FEEDWA TER FLOW TRANSMITTER; Sheet 2 Of 3 Status: IYU§Lj. UEJ Interaction, Effects

7. Are soft tarclgts free from imnactiby nearby:equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distributionrsysteis,*cei"ing tiles and lighting;
andm-sonry block wallsnot likely to collapse onto fhe equipment?
9. Do attachedlines have adquateflexibility to avoidd ainage?

vth 4

/lU0 N/AC Wf NC U[J N/AC]

Yeý*C UC3 N/AC]

10, Based on theabove seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment fiee.

of potentially adverse seismic interactioneffects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1t. Have you Iookedfdr and found no other.seisrnieconditions that could, adyersely affect the safety fUncdions of the equiipment?

Comments (Addiiodnal pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:~,

m 4

L~~

7

~

4 YOý10 Un Date;:

, 2

'.,/,

Page 235 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO NF6-P-2VRSION 1.0 Page 236 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sb"eY] of 3, Status: Y LfNo uLI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.,Q2N23HV3227C e Equip, ClassI 7 Equipment Description MOTOR DRIVEN AUX FEEDWA TER TO STEAM GENERATOR 2C Location: Bldg, AUXILIARY FloorEl. 1.30 Room, Area 2

1.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional.butrecommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other coniment

/

Anchora2e

1. is the anchorage configuration verification required (ie., is the item one of the 50% of SWELitems requiring such verification)?
2. is the anchorage.free of bent, broken,: missing or. loose hardware?

3.. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visiblecracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6-Based on the aboypeanchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse, seismic conditions?

Y0 N yi'j NO uFI N,'At-/

Yo NEI UEJ NIAX YEJ, Nn UEJ IA YO ND Ur N/A YO NEI U01 N/AI

/

Yeý:

U0]

Enter the equipment asis namne from Appendix B3 Xlameks of Equip*s*et.

Page 237 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet2 of 3, Status:.

'EI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo 02N23HV3227C Equip. Class, 7 Equipment DesewItion MOTOR DRIVEN AUX FEEDWA TER TO STEAM GENERA TOR 2C Interaction Effects.

7. Are soft targets free from imlpact*yv nearby equipment or structures,'

YL;-N-UF N/AD

8. Are overhead eqtipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles:and lighting and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached, lines hrave adequate flexibility to avoid damage?,
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse sei;mci interaction effects?

YP'N[D U0 N/AD

  • Ye"4o 'U0 N!/AD YEKNO U0I Other Adverse Condifions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditionsthat could, YtND Un adversely affect the safety finctions of the equipmaebt?

Comments. (Additional pages ma)i be Added as necessaiy)

Page 238 of 467

AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 239 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet i of 3 Status', YM 17 ULI Equipment UDN),M. Q2N23MOV32098 Equip. Classý 8 Equipment Description. SWiSOLATQON VALVE TO AUX FEEDWIA TER

,ocion: Bldg'-AUXILIARY Floor El 100.

Room, Manufiacturer, Model, Etm: (optional but recommended)

Instructious for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used towdocument the results of the Seismic Wal.kdown of an itch) of equipment on the SW.l..

he space below ea-h of th6 following questions niay be used to record the itesults ofjudgments anid findiings..Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora~e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the.itemr one of the 50% of SWEL 'items requiring such. verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. IS th.anchorage free of corrosion that. is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is theanchorage freeof visibie cracks in the concrete, near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorageconfiguration consistet. with plant documerntation?

(Note: This question only applies if the ter is one of the.50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage fre of potentially-adverse seismic conditions?

YE Yn NOI UE N/Atf<

YE INE TIE NIAI<

YE NE UE NlAd&/

YE NOE U Nu.

Y124*' TI PEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: C!i.es of Equipment.

Page 240 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 rS a

n3 Seismic Walk~down Checklist (SWC.)

Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y['NED UWE]

Equipment IDNoq. Q2N23MOV3209B Equip. Class 8..

Equipment lescription SW ISOLA TION.VALVE TO AUX FEEDWA TER Interaftion Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YOE]UO A

8: Are overhead equipment, distribution systenns;iceilingtiles and lighting, and masonrybtOck wallsnot likely to coiiaps onto the"equipment?

9. Do attached lines, have adequate flieyibiiity to avoid damage?

I0>w Based on the'above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adVerse seismic interaction effects?

YINO UDE N/AEn Ye/Nr! UD Other Adverse Conditions S1i Have you looked-for and found no other seismicconditions that could Y\\jND UD adversely, affect.the safety functions of, the: equipillent?

Cowfents.(Additional pages may be added'as necessary).

N/oVi-Evaluated by:

Date: ~.2 Page 241 of 467

AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 100 Page 242 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet s of3 Statfls: Y[

] U.-

Seismic Walkd6wn Checklist (SWC).

Equipment ID No. Q2N23MOV3210A Equip. Class, 8

.Equipment Description SW TO AUX FEEDWATER PUMP 2A INTAKE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor-EI. 100 Room, Area 2191 MantifacturerI Model, Etc. (optional but recommiended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistfmay be tisedtodocutebnt the results of thirSeismicWalkdown of ain item of equiprnent on the.

SWEL.'The space below each of the following questions may be used:torecord the results Ofjtdgments and findings:..Additionai space is proYvded atthe end of this checklist for documnent ing othei comments.

Anchommagse I., Is the. anchorage cdnfigbrationi Oerification required.(i.e.,is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiringsuchb verification)'?

2. Is the inchorage free of bent, broken, missing o6idooschaidware?

YE-lNc YO NM UON/A~r-"'

M/ L/A/l 66 141P OA) 6 Jr-

3. :Is the anchorage free ofcoirosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?ý
4. Is the-anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage-configuration consistent with plant.documenrtatibn?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which n:ananch*rage configuration verification is~required,).

6. Based on the, abbiw ancliorage e0aliuations,.is the anchoraige free of

,potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NE U-N/At3-YE NEI UE N/Ak*

YE NO UE N/AUE /

/1'NE UE flinter the equipnentclass name fromn Appendix B: Classes of Equipment, Page 243 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdowrn Checklist (SWC)

Equipment I).No. Q2N23MOV321OA Equip. ClassI,8 EquipinentDesciption SW TO AUX FEED WA TER PUMP 2A N TAKE Sh ret20)of3 Status:

U*Y L

UL-]

.Interaction*Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,

.and masonry block walls not'likely to collapseonto the.equipment?T 9, DO.atiachedlines lmve adequate flexibility to avoid: damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

NEýý0Un N/AOl Vle~

UL-N/AE:J fi-ouLI N/ýAcl W(JI~NO U0, Other Adverse Conditions 11t. Have you 10oked for and found no other seismic conditionS thiat could.

Z /N0 U adversely a.fft the:.afeiy funciioo-,of the equipment?

Conmrdents. (Aditional -pages may be added astecessary)

MVOA1P Evaluated by:

Date-,

9

-20 04, Page 244 of 467

AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 245 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown'Checklist. (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02N23POOtB Equip. Class' 5 Equipment.Description AUXFEEDWATER PUMP 2B Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El.

00

, Room, Area

  • i Shetaus ofI 3 Status: Yx~"N* Ujj Manufacturer, Model.'Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist.

This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item Of equipment on the SWEL. The space.belhw each of thefollowing questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments:.and findings. Additional space is provided at. the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorageconfiguration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

-D -2oI, G 7

,Vt..,

"1 *_-C,I Z"

2. Isthe anchorage free of bent, broken,.missing or 16ose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchiorageconfiguration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is.required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is. ihe anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YW<IIE3 V/MUn N/AEI vr-]UFJ N/A11 vIOU0J I\\/Aa gPINE UE1 N/AnI Y

U/D A

I Enter thetequipment class name from Appendix B: Classes qfEquipment, Page 246 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: )

Nf UF Seismic. Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipmeisot.D No Q2N23POOtB Equip. Class, 5 Equipmentt Description AUX, FEEDWA TER PUMP 28 Tnteraetion Effects

7. Are soft targets free firom impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Ae overhead equppment, distribution systems, ceilingtiles and lighting, and masonry blockwalls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10i Bae.d onl!e above seismi interaction evalntionS, is, equipment 60e, of rtenti Ily adverseseismric interaction effects?

YENE] UnFI N/A[~M~

Y~r EI ULJ N/IAE)

Y-M/,,lUU N/AE)

Aý'Nb UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked forland found no other seismic conditions that could adversely:affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y'ý a< 3UD-Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Date:

'~O L Page 247 of 467

T ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 248 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 3

,Sta tus: YKNF] U0I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentIDNo.

Q2PI1LT0515 Equip..Classl18.-

Equipment Description CONDENSATE. STORAGE TANK LEVEL. TRANSMITTER.

Location: Bldg. YARD, Floor EE i5 Room, Area C 5/

Manufacturer, Mode]; Etc. (optional but rec;ommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist Tius checklist may:be used to documentfthe fesults, of the Seismnic Walkdown of an item of equipmerit on the SWEL. The space beIow each of the following questicas may"be used to record the results ofjudkments and findings. Additionalspnce is provided at te end of this checklit for documenting other comments, Anchorage

1. Is.the anchorage configuration verification required (i~e., is theitem one YE] %7Z of the SO of SWEL iteis requirihg suclhverifitation)?
2. Is the anchorage'free of beat, broken, inissingor loose hardware?

yi&34 JUEN/A,

3. Is the anclhorage.,fteeof corrosion that is more than mild surface tJ NE] UM] N/AE]

oxidationT 4,. Is the anchorage free of visible cracksinthe concrete-near the anchors?

YG'E3] UCI] N/AE]

5. Is the anchorage configaurationconsistnfwith plant documentation?

(Note: this questiofi otnty applies if tin iemis one of the 5.0% for which an anchorage configuration v.ifscation is i.eired.)

6. Based on the above anchorage eyaluations, is the anchorage free of ptentially ad'verse'seismic conditions?

YE NE] UE] N!Ab'll LIE]-n P

3' Eiitcr fr Mpdfbissntf ApPendix 0: CI'ss o-IFý,uipmefti.

Page 249 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Yf UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment] DNo, Q2Pf1LT0515 Equip, Class' 18

,-.nipment Description CONDENSATE STORAGE.TANKLEV.EL TRANSSMITTE!iL

_R Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from:inpact by nearby equipment dr structures.?
8. Are overhead equipment distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls notlikely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to' avoid damage?

Wl0 Basedion the above seisjic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y eI\\C UE] N/AEJ Y~4 UO N/AEJ YV /0 U[:N/AE3.

YNU0

/

Other Adverse Conditions I I. Have you looked for and foundano other sdismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y V4 NUn Comments (Additional pages may be added as necesary)

Date:

g2,.

Z o

/7-7 r24,A 4 0A6 Page 250 of 467

AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 251 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Status: y N i tJv Seismic WalkdoWn Checklist (SWC)

EquipmetIli DNo. 02P1T001.

Equip. 0Cass* 21 EquipmcentDescription, CONDENSATE:STORAGETANK Locaitionw Bldg, YARD Floor Ell._55 Room, Area CST ManufacturerModelEtc. (optional butrecomotenrded)

Instructions for Completing Cliecl~is..

This chectkIiIst maybe used odocuýn nt lh results of the Seismic Wa~kdwn of an item of equipment on the; SWEL, T'he spacbelow eachtof folowhng questions tay heused t; record the results ofjudginens andý findingsl Additional spacet isptovi\\e at ie end of this checklist for documending other commentO.

Anchorage Is the anchorage configiratidh verification required (i.., is the it6em0one y

NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiriiin such.verifi~ation)?

.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken; missingor loose 1hardware?

Y

/NC3 UF N/AD 3, Is the anchorage free of conosion that is more than mild surface, i YeN*!

UC N/A1 oxidation?

ý

.S'c),

Corv s' i

o.

7

~ / s/'~r loss 0 7 e~ i~/.

~1

4. Is the, anchorag*.fiee of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y tJN C

UE N/AC

5. Is' the anchorageconfiguraiodconsistetit:

pl*nt document Lion?

Y UNC0 N/AC1 (Note: This~question only appli,*s ifithe itemis one of the 50% for which an antiornage cotnfig ratiorin.'brification is required,)I

6. Basedon the above anchoirage evtihiatioins, is the Ailehorage free.of Yk/NO UC potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Frni*;rr ihe Csqtipniellt Ctassriualne frorn Appendix BE

.Classes~of qsifirlent.

Page 252 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 0-1,C l Seis ic W al kdow n C hecklist (SWC)

Shcet 2 0f:(10 Status: Yca\\nD U0]

Equipment ID No. 02P'I TO0 Equip. Class 21 2

Equipment Descfiption CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK Interaction.Effects 7.. Are:sof. u-getsfree from impact by nearbyequipment or structures?

Yn NQ UI] N/AD 8, Are overhead eq[uipment, distribufionsystems,;ceilingtiles and lighting; Y

NO UDO N/AO andmasonry block: walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on thehabove seismiiic ffiteraction evaluations, is equipment free of pbtentially adverseseiismic interaction effects?

YO NO, UD N/A O NE UO Other, Adverse Conditions.

11. Have you looked for and fomd notherseismic conditions that could DO adý'ersely affect the safety* funetjions of the eqqoipntntt.?

Cornments (Addi tional pagesinay be added asinccessary) t) '4 Evaluated by:

I

.> (~

~.

ii Da.te:

Page 253 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 N-Page 254 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 255 of 467

T ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 256 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 V0.4Yy Sheet i o Status: Y[

NEIULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment.*iD No.

Q2P13HV2867C Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description CTMT PURGE ISOLA TIOOQUTýSDE CTMT VALVE Location: Bldg-AUXILIARY Fl'oor El. 121 Room, Area

.Manufacturer, Model,, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist maybe used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgunents and findings, Additional space is provided at the end of this1 chectist for documenting other c omments.

Anchorae I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e..,is the item one Y* NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the.anchorage'free of bent, broken, missingor loose hardware?

3, Is the:anchorage freezof corrosion that is more.tlan mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent withplant documentatioe?

(Note: This question only appis if theý ema is one of the:50% for which an anchorage configuration ei\\,e-nition is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YFI Nrl UE] N/A'1(

YE] NEI uC] N!AE YE NE UE NiA[9 YE] NE] UE] N/A' YONE] UE.

'Buor the eqfuipmient-class namet'r oin.Appendix B; Clasges of Equifpment.

Page 257 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of01j/

Status: YX N] UL-IJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No. Q2P13HV2867C Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description gITM. fRGE ISOLATION OUTSIDE CTMT VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y0 NQ U[3 NIAD S. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y¢d NI] U[I N/A[j and masonry block waalls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. DO attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Yý No DU0 N/AO

10. Based on the above seismiciritdractionevaiuations; is equipt*ert free

)p N[3. Ti-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 11, Have you looked ford and found no other.seisrnic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Yq NEI uE]

Commensts. (Additinalt pigcssny beý added az. netss~asy)

Evaluated by:*".

ia/

"'0 Date: elzalo Page 258 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 259 of 467

AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 260 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheets 11 Status: YEj NoA u~l Equipment ID No. Q2P16F5_OIB Equip. Classx 0 Equipment'Description. SW STRAINER 2B Location: Bldg. SWIS Floor EL.167 Room, Area I'21-A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (aptionr but recoammended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdov'n of ahnitem of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional tpace is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comnments:

Anchoraite vc /2 1, Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yt4 -N*p of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such. verification)?

2. Is theanchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Y ND UD N/AD

.3 Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YD NN:K U[

N/AD oxidation?

4., Isthe anchorage free.of visible cracksin the concrete near the anchors?

b NEI UtI N/AD1 5,. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plantdbeumnentation?

(Note: This question, only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchoiage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentiallyadverse seismic conditions?

.Y N,[

UE N/AE YD N0 UD Eater the-e aipineiitclassia,s frfoi App ardix B: Chissses Of Etcuipmeai.

Page 261 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Chekck ist (SWC)

Equipment 1DNo. Q2P16F501B Equip, Class Equipment Description SWSTRAINER2B Sheet,of (

Status: YE N UE]

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targetsftee from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y NOI UEJ NiAr

8. 'Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting; "V/ No, UEC N/AO and.masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9, Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based'on the above seismicinteraction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seicinic interaction effects.?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you1ooked for and found n0 other seisdiic conditions that cotild adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y PNI UOl ON/AD Yý.NEI] UMI Yvi N[:] urn Commnents (Akdditionalpages inay. be added as necessary)

Cf9 rP5Oq2-7 0 wo-S wri i~cn to de(4A" efl. Ii*

GzrrbsiOh.

-Evaluated V

Date: _,

.... 1iZ Page 262 of 467

AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 263 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 264 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 265 of 467

AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 266 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 13 Sheet 1, of 3 Sta is:

.. ND U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.,92P!6FV3009C Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description CCWHEAT.EXCHANGER-SW DISCHARGE Location; Bldg, AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 2AIoC iManufacturer, Model, Etc: (optional but-recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to. document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item ofequipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist,for documenting other t.omments.

Authora-e I, Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item ofie YE N-of the 50% of SWEL'items.requiring such verification)?

2. Is theýancfiorag ffee of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free. 6fcorrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks-in the concrete near the.anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This questiononly applies if the item is one of lhe:50%.for which an anchorage configuration verification, is required)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potein~ially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NO LU. N[Ai Y[3 NEI UM NWA6 YE NEI, UE N/A(d NO UE3

~Enter the equipmnent. class name fromA ppendix B;.C!"sss oftlquipment.

Page 267 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 S t0f3 Status: Y[2 Nn ULI 1'

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No, 02Pf6FV3009C Equip. Class' :7 Equipment Description CCW HEAT EXCHANGER SW DISCHARGE; Interaction Effects 7, Are soft'targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems; ceiling tiles and.lighting, and'masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid d/nnage?

10.. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluatbons,is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects'?

  • YýN1] UEJ N/AD Y"

NEI UCD NIAE1 Y

ND UD Other Adverse Conditions 1I.

Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YIý Nn U-D Coininents (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A~re_*

wI.**-b

  • *rorr

'2..6 is *r-4*tdc Cz-1S*l° (QZ.P'IcxI")

Evaluated býK:

Q&L,?LJI 3 Date-Page 268 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 269 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walk.-

4+ Chec l

ist

.L f e Seismic Walkdown Ch-ecklist (SWC)

Sheet.0ol/G Status: YE-NO UP EquipmenltID Nol Q2P16LO02 Equip. Classt 20 Equipment Description SW DISCHARGE VALVE RELAY CABINET 2B Location: BIdgod 1-too E D

Rob., Are L-M clwi Manufacturer, Model, Etc, (optiona but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This cheeldist may be used to document the resuts of the Seismic Walkdown of a. item of equ opm tn the SWEL. The space below each of the followirig questions may be used to record. the results of-udgme ts and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (ile.. is theitem.one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of.bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

I END YD ND UM N/AD YOJ NEI U5J, N/AD

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the conicrete near the anchors?

YO ND] U(3 N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration onssent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only-ppis if the item is one of the.50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6..Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YD ND t3J N/AD1 YD, NO U0 DiEter the equidimeni class name fromAppendix B: Classes of.Eqaippment.

Page 270 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 2 ofg,37 Status:: LYE],

N[]

Equiprnent ID No. Q2P16L062 Equip. Class w20 Equipment Description, SW__.ISCHARGE-VALVE RELAY CABINET 2B8 Interaction Effects 7i Are'sofi targets free from impact by nearby equipment~or stmet ires?

YP NO UONhAO

8. Are overhead equitment, distribution systeni s, Ceiling tiles and lighting, Y4 NI U-NiAO and masonri-y block W shnit likely to dollapseonto the equipment?

9.. Do attachedliines have adequate flexibility t o avoid dam age?

10. Based on the~above seismic interaction evaluations, i*equiperientfree ofpbtenhtially adverse Seisinic interaction effects?

Yk NEI tI N/AO Yt-NEI lO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and fdundsho other seismic condit ions thai could adverselyaffect the safety functions of the equipment?

A NED UtiE Comments (Additional pages may be addeý as necessay)

Evaluated by tA-)UL

~sJ

.Mat V ~~

YI 77Y

'ate:,

AACj2,Z Page 271 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0

/

Page 272 of 467

T ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 273 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 T-

-4 Page 274 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of K4 Status: YO NW uL]

Seismic Walkdowh Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P16POO1C Equip, Class. 6 Equipment.Description SERVICE WATER PUMP 2C Location: Bldg. S Floor EL Room Area I-.9A Manufacturer, Model, Etc, (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This phecklist may be used to documnent the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL'The space below 'ech:of the following questions may be used to fec6rd the results ofjudtgmentscnd findings. Additional space is providediat the end of this checkhist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraoe

1. Is the anchorage.configuration verification required (i e., is the item one Y[$ NE-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken,.missing'br loose lhardware?
3. ls~thearchorage free of corrosion that ismore than mild surface oxidation?
4. Istihe anchorage free of visible cracks inf the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the, anchorage coifiguration consistent \\ith plantdocumentation?.

(Note: This question. only applies if the!item is one of the 50% for w-hich.an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorag ev aluations, is the anchorage free of potent-ially adverse seismic conditions?

Yf NE. CE N/AE]

Y4 NEI UCE N/A Ye NO CE N/AE Y~g NE UE1 I Enter the CqudPrnenrt claSS Wiane-frorn Appendix,& Classes of-Equipment, Page 275 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 ofXH Status: Y18 NO] U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklistý (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02PI6POO6C Equip. Class, 6 Equipment Descriptiobln SERVCE.WA TER PUMP 2C

.Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impaci by.nearby equipment or st'ucfures'?

YO N[O UE N/A[]

8, Are overhead equtipment, distributionsysumtns, ceiling files and liglitint*

amd masonry block wails not likely to6collapse onto the equipment?

9-Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10; Based on. the above-seismieinieraction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse se~ismicinteractioi ieffects?

YVý INO UO -N/AO Ypi NO [JO N/AC YO3 NO U01 Other Adverse Conditions S.1. H1ave you looked for and fou id no othler seismic conditions that could

  • adversely affet the safety Uic'tions'ofl the equipment?

YMNO [UO CommentS (Additiona1'pages may be'added as necessary) k eavtc-*4 iiA 1 Vde

~i*:

lvaludted by:

i g.Y' -

j c\\J) o

k. :

'f~~t-Aý 404E1-/

I ill Page 276 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 277 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 278 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i1 ofry.

Status: Y*5 NO IjO SeismricWalkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equiipment JD.No.

_.2P16V514 Equip, Class! 8 Equipment Description SW TO TURBINE BLDG ISOLA TION VALVE, Location:: Bldg., YARD.

F0oa El. 155 Room, Area 2\\It

.Manufacturfr. Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

'Instructions for Coimpletinfg Checklist This checklist mah be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdbwn of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjuidgments and findings. Additional space is pwovidedit Ohe end of this checklistifor documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configurationverification iequired (i.e,, is the item offe.

of the 50% otfSWEL itemsreqpiring.such vedificaidin)?

2. Is the anchorage ftee ofbent, broken, missing ori0ose hardw:are?
3. Is the anchorage free:of corrosin thlat is more than mild surface oxidation?

YD Nd CE1 N/Ap

4. Is the anchtirgefRe of visib e 'iaeks in the concret near the anchors?

YE] NM UE3 N/A)Z'

5. Is the anchoragecoinfiguration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note:?This'quesitnon 01ly applies if the it em is o6ne of the 50% for

ýVhich an anchorge contg grion verificatiob is'requiredi 6; Based on. the abdve anchdfg*:valuations, is the anchorage free of potentiallybadverse seismic c.ousitions?

YE NEI UE N/AX' Y/0. NE CE

'Enter the equipinenvdqsn hname from Appendix B:,ClasqssofEquipmtsnL Page 279 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet of?ý Status:.

Nj ufl Seismic Walkdown Checklist(SWC)

Equipment TDNo.

Q0P116V514 Equip. Class' Equipment Description SW TOTURBINE BLDGiSOLA._TION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft t

ýdefon it jast by e a ' qupnri.orsrctr Y.ND uE N/AC3

8. Are overhead uiquppment, distribution systrei s, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yp N[3 'UC 2N/AC1 and masomny blot;ckwalfspt likely to collapse onto the equipment?.
9. Do attached:.intý have adequate flexibilityo t avoid damage?
10. Basedon the abb%-io seismic interaction evaitisri

'quipment ftree of pOtentiaily adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adve;:se Coaiditions

11. Have.you looked for and found no other s mic conditions that:could adversely affect the safety functions of tLdcquipment?

YA NCI U0 YNC 1UC Con ments (Add¶iti.ona pages rmiw he a9ddd as necesary)

Eva luatd db':

AcL~

J rjL~r.

c Date:,

'2

  • I....

Page 280 of 467

AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 nt Page 281 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 282 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 S sheet., ofN 4 Status:ý YfA NFI UL]

Seisnic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment,ID No., :Q2P16V516 q.....

Eauip. Class! 8 Equipment Description " SWkTO TURB1NE:BLDG TRAIN A ISOLATION Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El., 155 Room, -Area,.- "kZ T

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions, for Comnpleing g:Checklist This checklist mayi be u'sed to document the results.:of the Seismic Walkdown of an.item of equipment.'on the SWEL The~space below each of the following q esiions may be used to record the results ofjudgmentsaand finidings. Additional spact i s prov ided at the end o ft hi s checklist for documenting other'comments.

Anchorage

1. tS the anchorage,configuration. verificationreqýuired (i.e., is the item one: YE] No of the 50% of SWEL items, requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose-hardware?
3. Isthe anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE] NE]O U0 NWAY YE] NE] UE] N/A P.

4. Is theanchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YE] NE UE1 N/Ag 5ý Is the anchorage configuration:consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one olfite 50%"(

for

'hidh an anchorage configuration 'erification is r*qtiieied,)

6:. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic condition.s?

YE] NE] UE] N/Ag)

Y~iPNE] UE]

Ebter Otc equipment class name from Appendix 13: Classes of Equipment.

Page 283 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 S tatus:Si ýN2 0J[

Seismic Walkidown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentIDo Q2PV Equip. C1)

No Equipment Description SW TO TURBINE BLDG TRAiN A ISOLATION Interaction Effects

7. Are sof targets free from impCt by nearby equipment or structures?

& Are o veriead equipment, distribution systetts,:ceiling tles and uighritig, and maGnsya block walls not likeiy to c olapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attab:ýed lines have aidequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based oji the above seismic intraction evaluations, is equipment frte of poten aliy adverse seismic interaction effets?

yo, NEI tJQ N/A0fl YPNO UEN IN/A[]

Yo NOJ UE Ni A[:

YjjONE] VO Other Adverse Conditions 1. Have you loked for and founed n

.o oter shisni conditions tIha cotld:

Y0 NNE UO adversely affect the Safety adnetidns f ts eequipentt?

Comments.(Add tioifai~pages may be added: as necessary)

Evaluated by:

I

~~I/> Q7(

/

/

Date-_s+ii I.

4 Page 284 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 285 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 286 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 3 Status: Yý, Nir Ul1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID N.

02P16V539 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description SW EMERGENCY RECIRCULA TION TO POND Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 155 Room, Area v

Manufacturer, Model, Etc..(optional but recommended)

Instructions for. Completing Checklist This checklistmay be used to document the results of the Seismic Waikdown.of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below. each of the following, questions maybe us-ed to recdrd.the results of udgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the.anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEi Nk of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage, fre-eof bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more thab mild surface.

oxidation?

YE NE UE N/A+

YE' NEI UL. NlýE 4, Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YE No UF N/#

5.. 1s the anchorage configuration consistent with p ant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the;50% for which an, anchorage configuration verificationis required.)

6. Based on theabove anmhorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE NE[

UE-N/TA A NE liE nthrIe equipmnaetnenlas namne fromn Appendix 8 Glance offEquipmntn..

Page 287 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Status: -

NF-] UEI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No, W2P16V539 Equip. Class',8 EQuipment Description SW EMERGENCYRECIRCULA TION TO POND Interaction Effects 7.. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or stnrctures,?

Yý NE UC N*AC

8..Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NO UVE N/AC
  • and masonry block walls. iot likely to collapse onto the equipnment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility toavoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction 6ffects?

Y NEI UN/AC A NEI UC Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect'the safety Lnmdions of the~equipment?

Y6NM UCI Cbimments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

(-A-4 8 -;Z -- j Evaluated by: A A:

V s

I firot myc'i T-1--"o Aý Date: g*c3__

Page 288 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWVN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 289 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet i'of 3 Status: I NrD ULJ Equipment ID No. 02P16V546 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description SWDISCHARGE-FROMAUXILIARY BUILDING Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 4155 Room, Area

.Manufacturer;.Model, Etc. (optional butrecommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be usedto document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. Thespace below each of the following questions may be Used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments:

Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification requ'red (i.e., is the item one YE] Nq' of the 50% of SWEL items requiring sufch, verification)?

2, Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3, is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild stu-tce oxidation?

YE] NEI U] N/Aý YE] NE] tiE] N/IT

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in die concrete near the anchors?

YE] NEI TD. N/A' YE]'NE]tiE N/LW

5. Is the anchorage configu;ation consistent with plant doa'umentation?

(Note:This question only applies if the item, is One of ithe 50%:for which an anchorage configu ration verification is required,)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage ftee of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEt NE] UE] NIAEý

.p N Iu-0 Biter the equipmezv. class cnie fron, Apt; 'dixc tO Ctasses of tiquiptnent1.

Page 290 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status:

N13 u1D Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P16V546 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description SW DISCHARGE FROM AUXILIARY BUILDING Interaetion Effects

7. Are soft targets free Ifromimpact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y NO UO~ N/AOJ I

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y

NO UE N/AE1 and masonry block Walls not likely tO collapse oito the equippment?

9. Do attached lines hve adequate flexibility to avoid damrage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

YEZ NFO UC N/AQ UE*

JO

'Other Adverse Conditions 11 Have you lookedfor and found nn-other seinsmic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

IEJE Comments (Additional pages maay be added as necessary)

Eva] nated by: hkI

£Atýia M Date:

-- 1"-.

0# P7

-L Page 291 of 467

A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSIONID1.0 Page 292 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet i of*/4 Status: Y NO] U)

Equipment ID'No. Q2P16V563 Equip. ClassU 7 Equipment Description N.TN L BYR PCV Location: -ldg.

YARD floo r E. 155 Room, -Area V-1,e-1 ii,

2 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This:checklist may be used to document the:results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questiots many be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other commients; Anchorage

1. Isthe anchorage configuration.verification required (ie., is the item one YO-1 NP of the 50,owf SWEL items requiring such verification)?

lih 4 h c-~ g~

r-rj0~-

2. Is the anchorage free:of bent, broken, missing or loose: hardware?
3. isathe anchorage free of corrosion that is.more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is thbe anchorage free of visible cracks in theconcrete near the anchors?
5. is the anchorage configuratdon consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an~anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluation& *s the. anchorage free of potentially, adverse *seismic condtitions7 YO NO UO N/*A YO NEO UC NiAl, YO NOI UD N/Ai' YO NOJ UO N/A!

YAI NO uC.

/,

Eat V the 6quipmmn lass samne fimei Appbfidikx '3: Clwaies oft:

imet Page 293 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 o74 Status:

ý NFI U[E]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equitpment ID No.

2P*P6V563 Equip. Class'. 7 Equipment Description A TRN DIL BYP PCV Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equ pment or structures?

Y1NO] Ui] N/Ai]

S. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y,

Ni UD N/AO and mnasonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached Iiaeshave adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y *t1 Ni]I Ui N/Ai]

i] *U-i]

Other.Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely. affect the safety functions of the equipment?

?f$

NO Vri]

Comments (Additional pages may~be added as necessary)

Area vv*olIy--y fv-v'mve box ýz-v

-. A is with equ ipW- #D q P1 f'46 39.

Evsluated~by:

Date:

9 12 Page 294 of 467

AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 295 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 296 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 She.eti of j 4.

StatUs: YN2 N UEu Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

2P V6V578 Equip, Classi, 7 Equipment Description. 2C PUMP MIN FLOW Location: 'Bldg. SWIS_

Floor El. 189 fRoom, Area 72A ManufacttiiT,.Model, Etc. (optional but recommended).

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist niay be used to docuinent the resO~ts.of the.Seismic Wakdown Of An item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questons may be usedto~record the results of judgments and fitdings. Addiiionai space is provided at then

&d of this checklist foi-dhc-iimenting other comments'.

Anchorage

1. Is the andho.rage ýOhfigurati0n verifidation'required (i0e,, is the ttem one of.ihe 50% of SWEL items requirinigsuch verifi cation)?:

Inline valve, no anchorage

2. Is the tWichorfgeifree of bent, broken, ihisiing~or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion0that is more than mildsurface
  • oxidati0on JýA 9J 00

,ýYONA YQI NE] UE] W/AS YUE]

UDLE]

WIA!S 4ý Is the anchorage.freeof visible cracks ib the conrcret.near the anehors?

YO NEI UCI] NI/A

5. Is theanchorage cOnfiguration consistent with plihit dctumentation?

(N e:Trhis question only applies if the item.is one of the 50% for whichian anchorage confi~gtufaion verification is required.).

6, Based.On he above anchorage evaluiations, is theanchorage free of potent.liy adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NK] UE] N/A0.

Y[

NO UE]

ttcir t(Ctuic tcipniit~class net:e frontwAppeitctix 83: Casses of Equipmeiit.

Page 297 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 SIee t2Of/4 Statuss: YZJ NEIVEUl Seis -mic Walkdown Checlklist (SWC)

Equipment 11) No. 02PIQ!V578

-Equip.

Cla; Equipment Deseiption, 2C PUMP MIN FLOW Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free frotmimpact bynearby c:uipment.or structures?
8. Are overhead equiptient; distribution systems, reiling~tiles and lighting;,

and masonry block walls not likely to co1lapse ontothe equipmem?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10,. Based onthe ahove seismicinteraction evatluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effxets?.

Y(

NFC UC N/AC YZ NEI UD N/AO YZ NC 0C N/AC YZ NJ UOC Other Adverse Conditions I; Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NC [.O adversely affect the safety functions ofiie equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evailuated by:~4~CY~f~

Laura NdwQ Date:

!!ý Page 298 of 467

AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS S

0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 A

Page 299 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 300 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 fbI.

Sheet i of 3 Status: YMZ N[n U6 Seis micWalkdown Checklist:(SWC)

Equipment ID No.

02P17HO8I Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description SWING COW HEAT EXCHANGER Locatioi: Bldg. AUXILIARY Flo6orEl. 100 Room, Atea 2i185 Manulfacturer. Model Etc. '(ptional but redoininended)X.

Instructions, for Completing Checkfist This checklist may be used to, docuument thexresul tsof ihe Seismic Walkdo*st:of an item of etuipiment on the.

SWEL The space below each of.the following questions may Ibe,used to record the results ofjudgments a.tid findings. Additional space ts provided at the end of this checklist fot docuoieritingothercomtieirits.

Anehorage I Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i e., is the item one Y"

NO of the 5.0% ofSWELilems requiring such venification)?:

Drawig D206597 Rev; 6

2. Is the-artchorage free of bent, br6kei,. missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage ffee of corrosion that ismore than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the aichorag free of visible cracks in the concrete 7-a,& 1 e aeLhors?
5. Is the anchorage configuratioý c-nsisteint with ptlalt docu mentaioni?

(Note: This question only appdiiiS i r tt iten is one of the 50%l for

\\vhichao aanchorage Coiifiguration verification is reqilirdd,)

6.. Bao td on the above anchorage evaluations,.is the anchorage free of potentially adyerse.se.isiniccondidipns?

YN NO~ UEn NIA YIN NU UE3 NIAID YE NEI LID N/AO YLN NEI LID N/AD)

YE ND] UD3 Entner flie equlpmau.dsaici nine fioau.Appeiudix B: Classes of ttqaipmeoo.

Page 301 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NF] U[I Equipment tD No. 02P17H001B

-Eqtuip.

Class, 21 Equipment Desdirption SWING COW HEAT EXCHANGER Interaction Effects

7. Aresoft targets free fron mpiact by nearby eqiiijpmeit bi structures?

A cable tray has < I ý'of clearance from the top of the COW end cap (seepictvre), howeverboth the cable tray and HXare adequately restrained against vertical displacement There is nozzle equipmentat the~other end of the HX that is close to overhead piping but ludged OK since gap 2"

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached linesbhave adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Y0 NEI UO. N/AO

'YO NO, ti NIAC YN1 NOl tJ N/AO

10. Based on the above seismnic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y(D NO-Ut of potentially adverse seismic interaction, effects?

Other Adverse Condiihons 1.o eHave yo(r looked for aid faund no otbee.seismi cdhditions that could adversely affect, (he safety functions of the equipinent?

YZ NO UO

.Counents (Addiucenal pages may be added as mlcessa ry)

Evaluated by:, TeEist

.ý K4aii.

Date.

0 Page 302 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 303 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet.1 of 3 Status; Y11I NO UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 02P17HV3045 Equip. Cla ss 7 EquIpinent Description CCW RETURN FROM RCP THERMAL BARRIER ISOLATION o Y Location: Bldg. 8UXILIARY Floor El. L2L Room, Area Z Manufacturer, Model, Etcz (optionalbut recomnended)

Instructions for Completing Cheeklist.

This chehklist may be used to document.the resuiltsof the Seismic Wafkdown of an item Of equipment on the SWEL. The space~below each of the f0lloWing questions may be used toxecord the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional spaceis provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other.comments.

Ancoorage

1. IsT ie anchorage configuration verffication required (iGe, is tiheitem one YD NM of the 50% of SWEL items requitiig such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing 6r loose hardware?
3. Is the anchornage free of corrosion. that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Ishihenchorae free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent With plant documentation?

.(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%.for which an anchorage configuration'veilfication is required:)

6. Based on the above anchorage ealuations, isthe anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NO UVE N/A4 YO NO UOI NfA)t YE N 3c]E NIAOJ YE NE 0UE N/A0 Y* NE] UE Ente the njuipmnr class rnme from Append ix B:.Classes of Equipmenrt Page 304 of 467

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status. Y[ N] uL Seismic Walkdown hecklIist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q2P17HV3045 Equip. Class'T Equipment Descriptio on.CCW RETURN FROM RCP THERMAL BARRIER ISOLATION Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?:

NEI U.. N/A

8. Areoverhead equipment-distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, "qiNF-1 U] N/AEl and masonry~block walis not likely to collapse onto the. equipment?
9!, Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

-IkND UO ENA

10. Based onthe above seismic interaction evaluafions; is~equipment free YJ.4 NL-UI-of'potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

/

OtherAdverse Conditions S11. Haveyou looked for and found, no other seismic conditions that could Yn[ NOl UO adversely affect the: safeiy functions of the ecuiptnent?

Comments (Additional pages>may bh added asi*ie6esary)

-Evaluated by:

t a'~Lw~Ascc.

rs(Y.uU~'

Date: 1&j1 Page 305 of 467

0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 306 of 467

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13004A257&oldid=5244461"