ML14071A062

Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 1 of 562 Through 46 of 562

ML14071A062
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	02/20/2014
From:	Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A062 (46)

Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3 UNIT 1 - SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS (SWCS)

(Version 1.0 and Version 2.0)

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01 Note: In Version 2.0 of the report only Pages 347, 348, 447, 501, 502 and 503 were revised. Also Page 504 was added.

Page 1 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F/ z Sheet iof 3 Status: Y2'NEI U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. NIP19PCV2228A Equip.

Equipment Description PCV TO PORV BACKUP AIR SUPPLY PRESSURE CONTROL /

Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area (r.2IX, Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) NJ Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[- NJ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y UCN/AC u-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YV<*l UC N/A-oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YV/NO UC N/AC

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NO UC N/Aa (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y/NO U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 2 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y7 f0 U--I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. NIP19PCV2228A Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description PCV TO PORV BACKUP AIR SUPPLY PRESSURE CONTROL Interaction Effects

7. Am soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y$4/40 UD N/AO

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y4<D UD N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9, Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YIKN0 UD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y VN/UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions lI. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could IVN" U]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

_ /

.f)1'I"l~ //

F-%>?. / (_

-Y Lu(/~

Evaluated by: 5AnUW L.7V0) Date:

J3 -Z9- C,()(2-Page 3 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 MPU~V222A N1~9pC 2 22 6.iiKu At-R hLpl-Page 4 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 rVs.-

Sheas 1 of,[

Status: YZ NEI U0-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIB31HV8028 Equip. Class, Equipment Description PRESSURE RELIEF TANK ISOLATION OUTSIDE CTMT VALVE, v4 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area O *),B Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO' N~I of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO) NO UO N/AGý WWAQ flypcmylr1 ~,Vo n OY~zn~rm0*

31 Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NC UE] N/Aýj]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO) NO UO N/Ajý

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI UC N/Ag' (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO Un potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 5 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 M3 Status: Y23 NOf UL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1831HV8028 Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description PRESSURE RELIEF TANK ISOLATION OUTSIDE CTMT VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YG6 NO DUD N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yi NO UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YW ND UD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NO UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y6 ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: S Page 6 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 7 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 8 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of J'4 Status: Y13 NE] U[J]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QICI1EOO4B Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP SWITCHGEAR NO. 2 /

Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 235 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraue

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO Ni of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Reference SEWS package 0tC1 1E004B (April 1994)

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI U' N/AD Anchorage of cabinet is welded per design.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UJi- N/AO oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors'? Y9 NI U-I N/A["I 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UOI N/Al]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YR NO UI-potentially adverse seismnic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 9 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of $X Status: Y NI uCI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QICi1E0048 Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description REACTOR TRIP SWITCHGEAR NO. 2

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NO UD N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Ys NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NO UO N/A-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Scaffold #6273 is located within 3 feet of panel 0 C11EOO4B but is adequately tied to a rigidpipe/ conduit supportand therefore is seismically adequate.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 4g= 'a " .- 0 A Lcatra MotcI64- Date: --23-i

/ e ~V~At4LL~N~

Page 10 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 11 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 U7 s

Page 12 of 562 I

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ N[] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QlE1lFCVO602A. Equip. Class, 8 Pka F1-5 Equipment Description RHR PUMP MINIFLOW VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 83 Room, Area 128 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEI] NEI UE] N/A0

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE] UE N/AO oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] U-' N/AO 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI UE] N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 13 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NEI u[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIEIIFCVO602A. Equip. Class' 8 Pkq F1-5 Equipment Description RHR PUMP MINIFLOW VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 NO UO N/AQ

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YS NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NO UQ N/AQ

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y0 NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NOI UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

7 A WB is in folder F1-77, Equipment 0 1P1 7MOV31865B.

nts (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Tis package was Originallysigned on 6 12 but retyped for clarity on 10- 15-12.

Date: 8/29/12 8/29/12 Page 14 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 15 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 16 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 PH, She tl of 3 Status: NE] u[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIEI1FTO605A Equip. Class' ,v Equipment Description RHR HEAT EXCHANGER DISCHARGE FLOW TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 87 Room, Area I 2,0 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YOD "

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YAN0 UM N/AD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YV0N0" UO N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[NI4 UD N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NM UD N/Adl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y/NNDUD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 17 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

ý), LP Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y 0 0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIEIIFT0605A Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description RHR HEAT EXCHANGER DISCHARGE FLOW TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Ytz UQ N/AC3

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, 4N UD N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y//O UO N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ/ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y! oN1UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:. <z'-Kg,'~. Y*1,*L 4U( Date: 1, ' ,- . 20t2.,

(~AI*?~ / /,Th4'4,

'-U j L,-

Page 18 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 19 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 3 w Status: Y[5 NCI]UEI 'It-"t Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIE11LQ35948 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP LEVEL TRANSMITTER POWER SUPPLY Location: Bldg. dI/Ž2LI6B Floor El, bf ( 3 Room, Area 3 18 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraee

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NI*'

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[jNE] U[] N/AC[

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[j'NE UO N/AC oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[/NE- U" N/AO

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] U[3 N/A[U (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YET'N[] U0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment, Page 20 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

~'v1 Sheet 2 of X 5 ,,,

Status: Y¶f NE] U[M 9ý+

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1E11L03594B Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP LEVEL TRANSMITTER POWER SUPPLY Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[ýiNE U- N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y*/NO Ur N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y2+ND UD N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yd0NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEA'NDO U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 1 ///

Evaluated by: Date: ____ ___ ___

/

)e~a/% ~&.-

Page 21 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

-J Page 22 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 23 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Ii Page 24 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of;#ý Status: Y[] N)4 Ur]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIE11MOV8812A Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP TO RHR PUMP IA ISOLATION Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 83 Room, Area 0SA Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraie

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[:1NEA of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2, Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEIUD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO U NIA\

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YONO UO

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YOJNO UO NA (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

(6\ Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchoraje free of Y NEI UIJ potentially adverse seismic conditions? m I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 25 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FF- j~-

Sheet 2 of Status: YDj] No UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIEIIMOV88I2A Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP TO RHR PUMP 1A ISOLATION I I i.U@+*

M.

7.a

". " soft Are f*"vutargets f rSA 4 from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NP UC2 N/AD A Ia~e~-IV o ad4tr A" i fevN~ i % acp; r-,. t Coreab~a~ W"SW PFv~ialx A~r-~* it*% equynxm.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[ NO U[ N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

YIf NO UD NI/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YD NV UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse CoudItions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y# ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluatedby: lwm-CM AoaA1Ar#at M-"'.4j Date: 9 IV I 1§ýiL QiO  :-.- A. AAULIxhJZI NFCJAJ 7 ~ .

Page 26 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 l~IIVO 28 4 Rig A

Page 27 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 28 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 29 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

ý1-13 SheetuN ofZ Status: Y Nf-1 UE-'

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIEIIMOV8888A Equip. Class, Equipment Description LHSI TO RCS COLD LEG Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraze

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N5(

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE" NDI UD- N/AGY

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO ND Ur-D N/AE<

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YD] ND UD N/AEO/

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UD N/Ad (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YJ2ND] UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment clan name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 30 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Shet 2 of," LU Status: Y[S' Nn UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIEIIMOV8888A Equip. Class, Equipment Description LHSI TO RCS COLD LEG Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y&' ND U] N/At

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y9 NO Ut N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yfd NO UI= N/AQ

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y6 NE Ut of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Page 31 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 32 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 33 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fi- 14' Sheet*i of 3 Status: N*v"N] ur]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1EIIPO-IB Equip. Class' Equipment Description RHR PUMP 1B Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 83 Room, Area 1 2.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other com)nents.

Anchorave

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y/NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

7)1-74,ýS5Z VEZ. 1-0

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y ND U1 N/AQ

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y UCI NIAD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y/N[ UO N/AO]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y6//O U-N potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 34 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF1 64-RPT-01 , VERSION 2.0 FJ-Iq Sheetausof 3 Status: YPNM- un-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIEIIPOOIB Equip. ClassI 6 Equipment Description RHR PUMP 18 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y/NO U- N/AI

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y/Nt- UD N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yo INO U- N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free W/NO U of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO/N" U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Page 35 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

'4!

z" 0

Page 36 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ri-is/

Status: UM Sheet of.u u ,°]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OIE13PT0952 Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description CTMT PRESSURE PROTECTION TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area ___

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE N[a of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YEIN- Ur NfAr

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y2,NEl U- N/AE oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Ye NEI UE- N/AE

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE UE N/Am'/

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y&'N[E UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 37 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of ' 4" jm#

Status: Yd NO UE* *"' tv Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment LD No. QIE13PT0952 Equip. ClassV 18 Equipment Description CTMT PRESSURE PROTECTION TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y 1 N- UE N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y/N- UO N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y&(/NO U- N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YQ"NO UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YC/-NO Uri adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

\\A~Q.

See K-h1c Evaluated by: Date:

~Th *ca $A-/ h7-Page 38 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 0/ -It, taus 1--of ls Status: ENIuF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1E16HOO1A Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description CHG/HHSI PUMP ROOM COOLER 1A (TRAIN A)

Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area Ork Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora*e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y/ N*' 1 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? NO

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[NC- UCI N/AC

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y* NE U- N/AC oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE"NO UC N/AC

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YC3 NC UC N/AL/

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of X'0 NO UC]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 39 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fr-4 Sheet 2 0f,9 Status- YtýN[:] Un-]*1)l Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWt)

Equipment ID No. QIE16HOOIA Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description CHG/HHSIPUMP ROOM COOLER 1A (TRAIN A)

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Ygý NEI UEJ N/A

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y&1 NO UE" N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yjý NO UQ N/Ar

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YVNr UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YYNO] U-adversely affect the safety functions ofthe equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) a\V- 0Q)AG Page 40 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 p- il Shee: of.&*

Status 7 NN"] U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No, OIE16HO03B Equip. Class, 10 Equipment Description RHR PUMP ROOM COOLER 13 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 83 Room, Area ,2 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO~ N1- of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? MV1'O UOE N/AE]

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface -46NO] UO NIAD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y&/N- UE N/A-

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NEI UID N/A[I*

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of "'U1D potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 41 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 fl- 11 Sheet*2 of Status: NE U0" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIE16HO03B Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description RHR PUMP ROOM COOLER 1B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YOND UO N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIAND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? yýiNO UO N/AO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y(ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y'W/ND UD1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/IVPC L 5tT9A f (fPo . 74:, 'e

• I(;jý eovornk 6Z ItAxD I/D " 0--tlWer I -IV)1frAYh Z,4t4-,6y 66d1ul-Evaluated by, S o-f/"

D h1l

'Lne&I Date: sitz, ZZZ,-7, rý"l 10W6~' 14 Al, Page 42 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

'.7 Page 43 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

o -

Sheet I of 3 Status: Y /N[-] UE" Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OtE16HO04B Equip.

Equipment Description CCW PUMPROOM COOLER TRAIN B Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY FloorEl. 100 Room, Area "

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Auchorare /

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YM/No UO N/AQ o4Q.4 OJ .

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YYý U['-] N/AO oxidation?

AA1i pox'T F4-e I'zeA(% J4'4t JQ~~ (t3 Y-

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? VINO -UON/AV

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UE- N/A[i*

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YeýNU0 IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 44 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheets Of 3 Status: ýNEI ui-'

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIE16HOO4B Equip. Class, Equipment Description CCW PUMPROOM COOLER TRAIN B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YjýN[rJUC:N/Ajf*"ý 8, Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y INO- U- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y6 NO UQ N/AO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y&NO UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could XK6 NE] U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

>/KY~~~~~~e.~ iI/7o(~~f7 C'~c' 6- 14Weza&&j eAedlIsk, Evaluated by: )4/91/2 A)J Date: !g -2 /. ZO/Z._

Ct~~41 LouetA~/~-

Page 45 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 46 of 562 I