ML13004A255
| ML13004A255 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 11/26/2012 |
| From: | Miktus P Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Southern Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NL-12-2267 SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0 | |
| Download: ML13004A255 (54) | |
Text
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist :(SWO)
Sheet 1 of 3/*
Status; YDD Equipment ID No Q2G31HOO1B Equip. Classl 21 Eqisipmebiti Description SFP I HEAT E.XCHckANGER TRAIN A Location:- Bldg,.AUXILIARY FloorEL 165 Room, Area 274&6*7 Manufacturer, Model. Etc (optional but recormmended).
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist. may be used to document the results of the Seismic. Wlkdown of aanritem of equipment on rhe SWEL. The space below each of thefollowing questions may be used torecord theresults.ofjudgmniets and-findings, Additional space is provided at the end of this checkl*st for documenting oiher. comments, Anchorage::
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification requir*d 6(ie is thei*tte one 2]
of the 50%,.6f SWEVL items requiring such xenrification)?
- 11b8, P220 6 61 (p, 4 C) 21 Is the anchorage'ffeeof bent, broken, minssingor Iloose hardWare?
- 3. I the anchorage.free of corrosion ihat is more than mild'surfac*
YV/NO, UC N/AEC Y6N C 0
N/ACI 4, Is the anchorage free, of vi si ble cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
Y&-'N[] ULC N/AC
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration codisistet with'piant documentati on?
(Note: This question oni, appliesifthc item is one of the 5%O.ffir wbich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchoriage evaluations, is tfie an hoiage free of:
potrnuntialy adverse seismic conditions?
lkNC UC NIAC MZN CU Entor rtie-cqwpiucjit class niamei from Appendix 13: Classes ofEquipment; Page 123 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Sheet 2 of/ I Status: YfqN ND UI]
Equipment ID No. 02G31HO01B Equip..Class' 21 EquipmentiDescnpiion SFP HEAT EXCHANGER TRAIN A Interaction Effects
- 7. Ar*e**oft targets~free from impact by.nearby'equipment or:structures?
- 8. Are o~drhead equipmeit, distribution systems, ceiliiigltiles and li*,hting, and masonry block walls not.likely'to collapse~ono.i he equipment?
9.. DO dttabhed lines have adequatefleiiblity, to aydid damage?
10.. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse. seismicGinteraction effects?
V-f'E] U-N/An UJI N/AE]
YtT4DE UEJ N/AED Ytg'-ND UE1 Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for' 'A
' d found~ndootherseismic condifionsmttat'could XrZN1UED adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?.
Comments (Additional pages tnaly be*added aslooekssay)
Evaluated by: ý W 4vi
.. _ /
iDate:
Page 124 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 0
Page 125 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 126 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Status: Y2' NM uF- ýXpsfi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. Q2HIINGASC2506D Equip. Class" :20 Equipment Description AUX sAFEGUARDS CABINET Q%
Locatibd: Bldg. AUXILIARY FlborEl. 1556 Room, -Area 471 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optionaltbut recommended).
Instructions for Com'leting Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic W akdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each ofthe folIowing4questionfsmay be used to record the results of jtdgnients and findings. Additional space is provided.at-the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
.Anchorage
- 1. Isthe anchorage cqnfiguration veri.fication required (i.e.,.is the.item one of the 50% of SWEL items reqUiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage, free of bent, broken,, missing or loose lhardware?
31 Is the anchorage free ofcorrosion that is more than: mild surface oxidation?
f YR NEI YU*NEI UE N/AO' Yt3'-Nt
%00Z NIAL
- 4. Is the','anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
.Y[?N E]
N/AN U
5'. Is the a*chorage configuration consistent, with plant docurfiehtaftid?
Y[
NEI 00- N/A[]
(Note:.This qtuestion only appliei if the iteiii iione of the 50% 'for.
which an anchorage configuraiion verificatiuonis required.)
,4J
'o....
.A..
~-~
gj1
- 6. Based on the abovc anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y
NE-U M potentially adyerseiesmic conditions?
Ented'the equipment claes.nssmefrom Appendix B: Classes of lquip*ent.
Page 127 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Status: YRNN U-1 00f' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equippment IDNo, Q2HIINGASC2506D Equip. Class' 20 Eqtiipimfent Des.ription AUX SAFEGUARDS CABINET D Interaction 'Effects 7, Are soft targets free from impact by nearby~equiprn*pt'"r structures?
8: Afe 6verhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, andu masonry blbek Walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility, to avoid darnage?
10.. Basedon tfie:above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipmerint free ofpotentially adverse seismic interacti6n effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you lokged for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect:he safeiy fntctions of the equipment?
YEYNOj iE1 NiAE3 YE5'NmE up N LA E YEY'Nn UO NW.AS Y
NEI US1 I YEN5IUE Comments (Additional pages rmay e added as necessary) rye-AR,,4 Y
~4~1 LL~),
~
Evaluated by:,
Page 128 of 467
A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 129 of 467
A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 130 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 131 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Sheet i of4- &
A
,t Status: YIE NFý UZI,;j.4il Equipment ID No. :Q2HI INGB2504K Equip. Classf 20 Equipment Description BOP INSTRUMENTATIONVCABINETK iLocation: Bldg. AUX Floof El, 155 Room, Area 0471 Mahffattiii6fr M6del. Etc. (optional but recoinmiided)
--a ~
-:............ m -
=..................
Instructions for Completing Clecklist This checklist may be used to document the results Of the ScismicrWalkdown.of' an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of thefoilowing questionls mtpay be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings..Additional space ispirovided at the end of this checklist forddcuhrnnting othercoinnents.
Anchoiage I. IS the anchorage configuration verification required (i~e., is theitem one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such vedficationi?
- 2. Is the anchorage, free of bent, broken,. missintg or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of conTosion that is. more than mild surface oxidation?
YZ NOJ tJE7 N/AOI YZ NoJ UE N/AE3
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
YZ NO U0 N/AE
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistentwith plant documentation?
(Note:This question only appljes if the item is:orie of the 50% for which an anchorage configurationr verification is:reqtiired.)
Panel is welded to embedded plate in floor; Welds-are on the outside of the paneL The welds were confirmed to be consistent with the welds identified and evaluated in the SEWS package for this -component dated 7/1/93; All welds were determined-to be free from adverse conditons and to match plant documentation. See pagJes for pictures of typical welds' 4-YK NO UE3.N/AEI Enterthe equipment class name from Appendix.B: Classes df Equipment.
Page 132 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 6,4 Status: YN N[] UI 1
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipmen ilD'No. Q2H1lN0B2504K Equip. ClassI 20 Equipmieht Description WOP INSTRUMENTATION CAB/NETK 6, l3al~d.:on the above anchorage evaluaijons, is.the anchorage free of potentially advrse sdsnii
&conditions?
YONOJ U0 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targetse freelrom impact by nearby equipment or stIutres?
- 8.,Areov6hehd equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry blo.k walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Isolated cases were found where some of the east-west spanning runners were notfclipped6o the north south spanning runners.
However, all. north south spanning runners. are supported from the. roof and are prevented from lateral motion. The lights, vents and other items are supported f6rm the structure independently from the ceiling file system. The overall configuration is consistent with the configuration.identfied"and evaluatedil ithe. SEW,,S walkdown performed. on 7/1/93.. Due to the fact that the unclipped runners occur only in isolated cases and the fact that all tiles, are.supported on at least three sides, the ceili#g files will not fall arndadversely impact the panetls There are no ceiling tiles directly over any panels and the panels are all closedr,3 the top. A corrective action report has been issueldo reatach the6 looserunners;
- 9. Do attahedhlines have adequa=
flexibility t, avoid damriage?
Y02 NO tc NIAC]
Y,9 NEI UO N/AED YO. NnJ UO N/AED 10; ýBased on the above Seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN N0 U*D of potentially adverse seimic inteiadion effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
.J-, Have yOu looked for and found
- o.
Other seistnic conditions that.could YZ NEI: 0C adversely affect the sllfety functions.of the equipment?:
Page 133 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 Of/
O#
Status:, Y
,N I80 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 02HI1NGB2504K Eqil~pý.Class 20 Eqpipynent Desc66ition BOP INSTRUMENTATION CABINET K
Comments (Additional pages may be added as iiecessary) liv leaied by: PA~v Date: J_7_5__7 Page 134 of 467
A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 135 of 467
A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION fl Page 136 of 467
T ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF1 64-RPT-02, VERSION 1 0 Page 137 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet, 1of ItV
.Sta~tus: Y[EJ/NL U1ZJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment IDJNo.
Q2HVIINGNIS2503A Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description NMS EXCORE DETECTOR CABINET
.Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155 Room,,Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc (optional butrecomamended)
Insti-uctions for Coipleting Checklist.
This checklist may be used to document the restults ofbihe Seismic Walkdown.of an item of equuipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the follow~ing, queStioss mniybe used to record the results ofjudgents and findibgs. Additional space~is provided at the end ofthis checklist for documenting~othercomments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is,the anchorageconiýguration verification required (he., is, iae item One of the,50% of SWEL itemsrequitingsuch verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing oriooseIhardware?
3.. Is the anchorage frepe ofcurrosion.that ismdre.than rniid surface oxidation?
Y&'NEI Yl:' NE] UD N/ADq Yl 'ND U0 N/AD
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks inthe~concreen natthe.anchors?
EY'ND UD N/AD
- 5. Is the anChorage cdohfiguratiponrc nsistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage co~nfiguration verification is requited.)
Y[O'N] 'U0 N/AE3 tkA 61'1 AýL'-&
~-e-*~ ~
- 6. Based on the :above anrichrrge evaltiatirns'i~s the anchorage free o f potentially adverse seismic conditions?:
Enter the equipmenrclass name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 138 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 StYNv Statu-,s: YEY:ND :UC:
.Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ffiNo, Q2HI INGNIS2503A Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Descriptioi NIS: EXCbRE DETEC TOR CABINET lnteractio UEfrects
- 7. Are soft targets fi-ee from impact by'nearby equipment or utructures?
S. Are overhead eqUiipment distribution itY"ems, ceiling tiles and:, bhii*g, and na sonry block Wvalls not likely to collapse onto the equiprfett?
- 9. Do attachedlineshave adequateflexibility to avoid damage?
- 10. Based ondthi above seismic interactionevaluafious, is equipment, free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
YD'ND NU N/AD YdND lUD N/AD YE?'Nn UD N/An "Y[.1'ND UD Other Adverte Conditionsa I i. Have you looked for. and found,no other sejsmnic conditions that could Y9: ND UD]
adversely affectcthe safety fiuetious of the equipment?
Comments (Additiwal pages nhay be added -s necessp)
A.,K V r '4 ~tn t~4 tdV~
' 'i4~ A)..I.
UlJit~ 'Y 'V.
i L
IU2
~~MJ~~
't<:~t w
Eyaluated'by:
L)71
~lL.
V
___________Date:
7i
[
03 niV 15
~
V ALi~w 'V A*V
(? IVi L~ f' Dt~'~J~ A tL~
L V
I Page 139 of 467
A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 140 of 467
A A'TTIACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 141 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet.,ofI-.
Status: YjN NM1 0]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID:No. Q2H-1,NGPIC2505Q Equip, Classl 20 Equipment Description Process Protection Cabinet Channel 4 Location: Bldg. Aux. Bldq Floor El. 155 Room* Area Manuficture.r Model, Etc. (opti.fiul but recon*ended)
Instructions for. Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document theresults of the SeismicWilkdown of an item of euipment ri the SWEL. The space below each of the following quesuions may be used~to record the results of judgments and fildings Additional space is provided it the ed odf this checklist for documeriting other comments.
.Anchorase I Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yo Nn of the 50%-of SWFL iterns requiting such verificatiio)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of heift, broken, miiissing or loosew.hnrdware?
Cabinet is welded, to embedded steel in the floor, 3, Is the anchorage, free of corrosion that is more than thild surface oxidation?
YN NCO U N/AC YN NE UE] N/AC]
- 4. Is the'anchorage free of visible cracksiii the concrete near the anchors?
YX No UO NtAC]
- 5. Is the anchiorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies'if the itemn is one of the 50% for which an anchorage'configuiation verification is required)
Anchorage, docunentation was obtained from SEWS package for this:
component, dated 7*1/93, Anchorage consists Wof welds to an embeddedplate located on, outside of cabinet, Carpteting was partially removed to veriy that welds match documen ted condition and that they have no adverse seismic conditions, YZ NEI UCI N/AC
':Enter the equiprretit dass tiam thiisi Appendix B: Classes (,f tqu;PD-,inL.
Page 142 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of;kl.
wllw Status: YZ NM UE]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No, 02HI INGPIC2505D Equip.
Equipment Description Process Protection Cabinet ChannlI 4
- 6. Based On the abbve~anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage five Of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YZ NO UOC Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft. targets free from impact by ne,'iiby equiphient oif §tructures?
Y0 NEI tiD N/AD
- 8. Are Iehed equipment distribution systeiks, ceiling tiles and lighting, nd ma onry block, walls not likely to collapse ontothe equipment?
Suspended ceiling and fixtures (lights, vents, etc) inspected and determined to be seismically adequate. Isolated cases found where runners were not ctippedat both ends. See walkdown package for 02HI 1NGB2504K (package F2-42) and CR506358 for additional information on the control room ceiling.
9,: Do attached lines have adequate flexibilityrto avoid, damage?
I10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic1 interaction effects?
Y0,NC U0 N/ACI YZ ND* UO, NI'A[
Y0 NO t/C N/AC Y N C? DC]
Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked forand found no other seismic conditions that mould YZ NC UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additionalpages may be added as neceSmary)
Verfied the adequacy of welds as per SEWVS for 02H41 I NGBR2504K-B and 02H I I NGPtC2505Al 1, dated 7-1 The Area Walk By is included in package F2-42.
Page 143 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Shee003 of 42 I
- E" l bate Y P. Miktu.
Date' 0842342 S. Yua 08-23-12 Page 144 of 467
A ATT-IACHMENT 3:. SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS is NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 145 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 146 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
i NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 147 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS is NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 148 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS S
0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 149 of 467
A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 150 of 467
A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 151 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 152 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 153 of 467
T ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS S
0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 154 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of/A IV Status: YZ NEI UVE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 02HI INGPIC2505H Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description Process Control Cabinet Channel 4 Location: Bldg. Atlg-Floor El:
155' Room, Area Mamnfacturer, Modell Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing.Checklist This, checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comrneints.
-Anchorage F. Is the anchorage configuration verifiCaliom reqtired (Le, is theitem one Y[D NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. IS the anchorage free of bern, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Cabinet is welded to embedded steel in the floor.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild: surface oxidation?
YZ NEI U] N/AU YN NJ UCU N/AF1
- 4. Is the anchorage five of visible cracks inthe concrete near the anchors?
YO NEI UF N/AU
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Nte: Thlis qIuestion only appliesi.f the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required)
Anchorage documentation was obtained from SEWS package for this component, dated 7/1/93. Anchorage consists of welds to an embedded plate located on outside of cabinet Carpeting was partially remtoved to verify that welds match documented condition and that they have no adverse seismic conditions.
YZ NE UCU N/AU
'Enter thie eQiipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment, Page 155 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Shea t 2o NO U tE Status: Y[* NE tJQ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentilDNo, 02HYINGPiC2505H Equip. Classp 20 EFqluipment Description Process Control Cabinet Chaniel 4
- 6. Based on the abdve anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[9 NE U0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are, soft targets free firom inmpact by nearby equipmeiit or strictures?
8 Ai. overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Suspended-ceilingand fixtures (lights, vents, etc) inspected and determined to be seismicallyadequate. Isolated cases found whre runners were not clipped at both ends. See walkdown package for 02H 11 NGB2504K (package t242) and CR506358 for additional information an the control room ceiling.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexiblity to avoid damnage?
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, iscqquipment free of potentially adverse scismic interaction effects?
YN NO UO N/A0 Y&~ NEI VEJ NIAE YO NOl UO:N/AO YZ NO UEC Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NO Url adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional. pages may be added as uecessary)
Verified the adequacy of welds as per SEWS for 02H ft NGBR2504K-B and 02HI1NGPIC2505A4, dated 7-1-93. The Area Walk By package in included in package F2-42 Page 156 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS N
.Evaluated by: P. Miktu 2 S.*-urn
- 0. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 She*-et 3of *itf oo[
Date: 08-23-l2, 08.23-12..
1~'~
Page 157 of 467
A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS S
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 158 of 467
3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS S
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 159 of 467
p 0
0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 160 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 161 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
O0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 162 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 163 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
O0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 164 of 467
AA'I-IACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS S
S NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 165 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of/5/
Status: YE'N-]. ULI Seismic Wa.lkdown Ch.ecklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. Q2H 1.NGSSP2506N Equip; Equipment Description SOLID STATE PROTECTION TEST CABINET Location: Bldg., AUXILIARY Floor El. 155 Room, Area 1111-Manufactureri Model, Etc. (optional but recoinmeiided) instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be: used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the.
SWEL. The space below each ofthefoll pwihg'questions may be used to record the results ofiudgmients and findings.,Additional space is provided At the end of this checklist for dociumenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configurationverification required.(iLe, is theietemnone of the 50%. of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage, free of bent, broken,inissing'or. loose hardware?
- 3. Isthe anchorage fr*ee ofcorrosion that is more than mild'surface oxidation?,
4ý Is the anchoragefree ofvisible cracks in the concrete near theanchors?
YE3'NEI Z_*NE] UD N/AD3 YVNrD UE1 N/AED Y/ND] UD N/AD
- 5. 1s thfe.atchotnago configuration consistent with.plant documentation?
YEI NM UD] N/AE]
(Note: This question~orly.ipplies if the item. is one of the.50% for whichzan anchorage'configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Ba'sed on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YdNDI UD potentially adve&se seisuisicrcoiditions?
Enter the equipmeneiclass nanie Iefrpm Aplpendix B: Class* of Equipteniht.
Page 166 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0
-Sheet:. 2Lf,'<
Status: Yf ND-Un Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmeniID.No. Q2HIINGSSP2506N Equip. Class' 2W Equipment Descriplion SOLID STA TE PROTECTION TEST CABINET Interaction Effects 7: Ate soft. targets free from irpact by nearby equipmct or structures?
Yd N" UO] NiAt]
- 8. Arc overhead equipmentdistribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting and.mason*Tyblock walls not likely to collapse onto the equipmenst?
- 9. Do attached, ines ha~e adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
- 10. Based on thd abhe seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of poteltially adverseý,seismic interaction effects?
YgiNEI UE3 N/At, YNt] ýUct N/At]
YE]N0 UM]
Other Adverse Conditions 1 1. l ave you looked for and f6tind ho ther seiksmic cndiditions that could adversely affect the safety.functions of:the equipment.
YQN D Ut]
Comments (Additonal pages ma.be addedasneessary)
Evaluatedby:
Date:
4 Page 167 of 467
S ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOMWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 a-r Page 168 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 169 of 467
p 0
0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 170 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Sheet i of,6 Status: YD NDUN FquipmentADNo. 02H21EO05 Equip.Class, 20 Equipmeint,Description g4.16..KySW/JTCHGEAR2G LOCAL CQNTEPANEL Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room. Area 2233 Manufakrrer, Model, Etc. (p4?tional hut recommended)
Instructions, for Completing Checklist.
This.checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the:results of.judgments and
.indings. Additional space is provided it the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorag configuration verificaion required i(eý, is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchorage iS inside panel and cannot be verified tu-)b i OX)t 1 Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3.
Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Y10 N--
Y1] NE. US NIAC YO NE UE N/AE
- 4. Is ite anchorage free of visibli cracks in the concrele teear the anchors?
YE NEI US N/AE 5; Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant'documentation?
(Note elThis question only applies if the itern is one of the 50% for which an anchorage cofifiguration verificatidO isrequired.)
6, Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage freeof potentially adverse seismic-condmtiOnS.
YFJI NE.U L~N/A2 YE3 NE US~
'Enter the equipment tass tame forn AppectidxtB: Classes of Equipment.
Page 171 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of (
Status: Y[3 NF1 UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipmen ID No. Q2/H21EO05 Equip. Classy 20 Equipment Description 4.15KV SW/ TCHGEAR 2G LOCAL CONT PAANEL Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Test cable N2R1 t5GO01D is'wrapped around existing Siemens junction box as documented in Deficiency Report 565268 (See Pic) on 4-7-05.
==
Conclusion:==
Cable ardattached piece of equipment could impact panel in seismic event
& Are overhead equipmentdistribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipmeni?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility tb avoid damage?
- 10. Basel onthe above seismic interaction evalualions, is.equipnent free Of potentially adverse seismic interaction, effects?
YCI NEI UC N/AEI YN NO. UEJ N/AEI YO NO u0j Other Adverse Conditions lI. Have you looked for and fourd~no other seisnic..onditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
YO NEI UO Comments (Additiottal pages.nay be added as tecessary)
CR 504967 was created to document the. housekeepingi test cable issue described in #7 above, Evalitated by:
myI.A acC "*~
t ljwawct(V Date:
SLJV~~kLE
/
fKpi~
e~- i-A-b au-I Page 172 of 467
p S
0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 173 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 174 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 175 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 176 of 467