NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 217
| ML14071A079 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 02/20/2014 |
| From: | Southern Nuclear Operating Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NL-14-0249 | |
| Download: ML14071A079 (51) | |
Text
ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 8 Status: YoJ N10 Ul-F1-644 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIH21E527 Equip. Class',20 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 18 LOCAL CONT PANEL Location:
Bldg. DEISEL Floor El. 155' Room, Area 5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (oplional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraee I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchorage verified per SEWS package dated 5&24/94.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
YO NO YO NO U[3 N/A YO NO U[3 N/AQ 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yo NO U[] N/A[]Several of the anchors have missing grout in a cone-shaped configuration.
This condidon was noted In the SEWS package. See Comment 2.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified per SEWS package dated &24/94.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Several anchors are missing grout. See Comment 2 YO NO' UD N/AD YO NO UO' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 57 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FJ-o0.4 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 8 Status: YO NO U-Equipment ID No. 01H21E527 Equip. Class' W .Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 18 LOCAL CONT PANEL interuction E17ects, 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YI@ NO 110 N/AO 8. Arc overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO Ur N/Ar and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?All Internal and external lines are routed such that no adverse seismic condition exists.10. Based on the above seismic inleraction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YJR NO url NIAO YO NO U-0 Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO Url adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments,(Additional pages may be added as necessary)
- 1. External Inspection completed 8/24112. Internals Inspection and anchorage vetfilcatNon performed 1M9/13.2. As noted In Question 4. several of the anchor bolts are missing grout In a cone-shaped configuration.
This was noted In the SEWS package (&24194) and a subsequent delaied evaluation showed this condition does not present an Immediate operablity concern. Several enhancements have been made to the anchorage incudlag:
shlmdrrng a gap between the panel and grout pad; additIonal 3S expansion anchors on the back (North) side of the cabinet; and a 114' plate welded to the frame which Is anchored by (2) 3/8" expansion anchors near the font (South) side of the panel. Therefore, this condition Is judged by the SWEs to not be an Immedat concern. However, repairs should be made to the existing grout near the cast-in-place anchors.(Ref. CR 716676)Page 58 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1 6q(, Sheet 3of 8 Evaluated by: Brian Nelson Niko,' Arm,,t Daw: I,,/I*---.?
/0/9/13 Page 59 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-046 (QIH21E527)
Sheet 4 of 8 Page 60 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-046 (QlH21E527)
Sheet 5of 8 Page 61 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl1.046 (Q1H21ES27)
Sheet 6of 8 Page 62 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-046 (QIH21E527)
Sheet 7 of 8 Page 63 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-046 (QIH21E527)
Sheet 8 of 8 Page 64 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 7 Status: YO NEI UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIH21NBAFP2605A Equip. Class Equipment Description HOT PANEL A Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 24 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoran-e
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Anchorage configuration verification completed on 8/28/12.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified on 8/28/12 against SEWS package dated 5/94 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Anchorage verified SAT on /28/12-YO NO YO NEI UO N/AD YO NO UO N/A-YO Ni3 Ur NlAO YO NO UD N/AO YO NE UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 65 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: YI NE uEJ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O1H21NBAFP2605A Equip. Class'Equipment Description HOT SHUTDOWN PANEL A InteractionEfet
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO NEI U[3 NIAO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yl9 NE UlI NIAO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO Url NIAn YO N[3 UI-Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO Un adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
The cabinet internals were Inspected and no missing fasteners were observed.
The HSDP contains a large amount of active and spare cables. All cables were observed to be bundled together in sections wih several large plastic tie wraps and contain adequate flex with their current routing. The tie wraps siue are large enough to not prevent a risk of cutting the cables during a seismic event No adverse seismic conditions have been Identifitd.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed onginaly on 8/28/12.FInal walkdo~wn performed on 1/25/13 to Inspect cabinet internals and complete anchorage verification.
No adverse seismic conditions noted.Page 66 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos-Tayl/or YounjebI od y ýSheet 3 of 7 Date:, hSlI3 Page 67 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 7 Page 68 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 7 Page 69 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of 7 Page 70 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 7 Of 7 Page 71 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS FI.-14%Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 7 Status: YO NEI U[Equipment ID No. Q1H22LOOIE Equip., Equipment Description MULTIPLYING RELAY CA BINET IE .Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area 318 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraee 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Anchorage verified SAT on 8/28/12 YO NO UD N/AD YO ND U- N/Al YO NO U- N/AD YO NO UO NWAS YO NO U-' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 72 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 01H221.IE Equip. Class NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: YO NO UD Equipment Description MULTIPLYING RELAY CABINET 1E Interactdon Effects 7. Are soft targm free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YR NO UD NIAD\ Walkdown performed on 8128/2012 noted possible interaction effects due to a 1-1/2" dla. conduit within 1/4" of the relay cabinet (CR 508376 documents this condition).
This condition has been evaluated in TE 540860 and found to not cause a seismic 2lInteraction concern.s _ [L2 S. Ae overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YEI ND3 UDl N/AU3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do aUwched lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damag?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO Nn Un N/An Y19 NO U3 AdvYerse Conditions
! .Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE N[3 U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
The cabiet eale wete kpee and no mss fstwmers wWe observed Thefs Is a loose label on the lower left kirnal tenmnnal"& This don not pow a brat to Oe moolae dkita a seiut1 event Ackhwonsly, apsis camble are bundle at dos botta of the cabne TMese also do not mpresent an advem condltn. AN ntea connectons and routed mbles have been determined to be adequate and poae no adkierse sefsmic concftkn.Cmusets(Additonal paoes may be added as necessay)SWC completed crtglnal on &28/12.Final wakdown perfrmed on 1/25&13 to Inspect cabinet hntmTals No adverse seiic conditions noted.Page 73 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 7 Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos Dale: eLe.1'L~~Q TaylIor Ygunpblinnd 112rlL 3 V V- U Page 74 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 Of 7 Page 75 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 7 Page 76 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 6 of 7 Page 77 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 7 of 7 Page 78 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 5 Status: YZND [3U]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1H22LO02 Equip. Class;Equipment Description TR-A&NSFER RELAY CABINET 1 Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area 347 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO NE 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified to be consistent on 8/28112 against SEWS dated&f26194.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Anchorage verified SAT on 8/28/12.YO NO3 U[3 N/AQl YO NOi UI- N/AI-NO UEJ N/A[]YO NO UO N/AO YI@ N[] UO IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 79 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN N[3 UDi Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 01H22L ,0 Equip. Class, Equipment Description RA-NSiFER-RMAY QABINE 1 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Y9 NO UQ NIAIJ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIN NO UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YI@ NE UD N/AD YO Ni UC Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UQ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
The cabinet internals were Inspected and no missing fasteners were observed All internal connections and routed cables have been determnined to be adequate and pose no adverse seismic condition.
Cormeats (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed orginally on 8/28/12.Final waikdown performed on 1/25/13 to Inspect cabinet Internals.
No adverse seismic conditions noted Addtonalfy, the IPEEE Outlier from the IPEEE walkdowns has been verified to be resolved.
The outlier was to bolt the panel to the adjacent MCC. This has been resolved.el.tlm.111" Evaluated by: Ryan Haros 9.Date: j lzrt a I Taylor Youngbiodd-XI Page 80 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet a of s Page 81 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 82 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Page 83 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: YZ No U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) T- 1--15 Equipment ID No. 01H22L503 Equip. Class'Equipment Description DIESEL LOCAL RELAY PANEL 16 Location:
Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area M Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraze I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Reference SEWS package dated 5/24/94. Anchorage Is internal to cabinet.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Y19 N[3 YO NE UD N/AQ YO NO UO N/AD 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yo N[] U[] NIAQ-5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage verified using SEWS for 0 1H22L503, dated 5/24/94.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NO U0 N/AD-YO NO UI' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 84 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NE UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 01H22L503 , Equip. Class Equipment Description DIESEL LOCAL RELAY PANEL 1B Interaction Effects 7. Arc soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO N[ UO N/A[8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NC' Ur] N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YS NO UO NlArQ YO NO UlI Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO Ui]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed originally on 8/24/12. Second performance being pedormed to inspect cabinet internals and perform anchorage verification.
Cabinet internals inspected and anchorage verification perfbrmed on 1/17/13. No adverse seismic conditions noted.Evaua~ited hv: flu-nHqrj-...-
Date: -- Ib, I 4 Page 85 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 86 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-0S3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet I of 5 Status: YN NEI Ul]Equipment ID No. QlN11PT0476 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR IA DISCHARGE PRESSURE Location:
Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155' Room, Area 462 Manufacturer.
Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Insulation was moved to the extent necessary to Inspect all hardware.Mounting bofts and other hardware are Intact and in good condition.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
YO NO UC N/AnNiO UC N/AD 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO UO NIAr 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YO NE Un N/AI Y0 NO UO' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 87 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Wtlkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NEI ul]Equipment ID No. QINIIPT0476 Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description STEAM GENERATOR 1A DISCHARGE PRESSURE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO NO UO NIAO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO Ur NIAQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Interaction effects evaluated during initial walkdown 8/29/12. No other adverse seismic conditions were noted.YO NO UO~ NIAQ YO NO UO Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yfa NO" UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
All mountng hardware Is Intact and In good condition.
All cables have adequate flexibility to not pose an adverse seismic condion.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
External Inspecion pedormed on 8/29/12.Second walkdown performed to inspect Internals and anchorage found no adverse seismic condtions.
Evaluated by: Brian Nelson Nikole Arrant ( .c Date: 10/16/13 10/16/13 Page 88 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-053 (QINllPT0476)
Sheet 3 of 5 Page 89 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FI-053 (Q1N11PTO476)
Sheet 4 of S Page 90 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-OS.3 (QI.N11PT0476)
Sheet 5 of 5 Page 91 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 4 Fl-0e&3 Status: YS Nr- U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIP13HV28670 Equip. Class, 7 ---Equipment I-scription CONTAINMENT PURGE ISOLATION INSIDE CTMT VALVE Location:
Bldg. QTMT Floor El. 129' Room, Area 129' ELEVATION Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[3 NE3 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Inie Cagponen -No anchorage 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Inline Component
-No anchorage 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
InlIne Component
-No anchorage YO NO U- N/A0 YO NO3 U- N/AI 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE! NE! U[ N/A0 Inllne Component
-No anchorage 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Inline Component
-No anchorage 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YQ3 N[3 UE! N/AO YO Ni U[3 6 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Clames of Equipment.
Page 92 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of 4 Status: YZ No ur0 F1- 10& 3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIP13HV2867D Equip. Class'_7_Hquipment Description CONTAINMENT PURGE ISOLATION INSIDE CTMT VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Arc soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
No soft targets were Identified which could be impacted by components or structures in the area.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
All overhead equipment Is adequately supported and not likely to cause an adverse seismic condition.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YS NO UD N/AI YO NO U- N/A-YO NO U- N/AO YO NO UO Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO Nr UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
No conditions were Identified which would result In a potentially adverse seismic condition.
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Area Walk By performed In conjunction with this SWC for Containment 129' Elevation.
Evaluated by: Bran Ne Nikole Ar-r-ant Date: 9 z.,I/5?oI?Page 93 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-063 Sheet 3 of 4 Page 94 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-063 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 95 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y[ N[ UDl Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 01PI6G517B Equip. Class' 2,,,,,0, .Equipment Description TURBBLDG SW ISO VALVE RELAY BOX Location:
Bldg. QDESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area QQ00 .Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions For Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorae I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% or SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Reference SEWS dated 5f25194 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Anchorage confirmed SATan 9/10/12 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Anchorage confirmed SAT on 9/10/12 YO NE YO NOI U3 N/AO3 YO NEI UO NIAI YO NEI U[3 N/AQI YO NO U[3 N/AOl YO NO U0' Enter the equipumm class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 96 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y0 NEI U[I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 01P16G517B Equip. Class' -,20 Equipment Description TURB BLDG SW ISO VALVE RELAY BOX Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YO NO UO N/AQ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UI N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YC9 NO UO NIAO Yt9 NO UO Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YIV NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
SWC completed SAT originally on 9/10/12.Final walkdown pertomed to inspect cabinet internals.
Area Walk-by is in Folder F2-89 Evaluated by: Laura M/ 10agwou 0 Terr lAulenill&
-Date: I Page 97 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 Of 4 Status: YO NEI U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipmren ID No. Q1P16G517B Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Decription W". 3LD09.WJ _ VALVE RELAYBOX Page 98 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 99 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 8 Status; Y0 NOi u Equipment ID No. 1R1A8M Equip. Class'- 3 Equipment Description 4.16KVSWITCHGEAR W Location:
Bldg. DIESEL. Floor El. 155' Room, Area 56C Manufacturer, Model. Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
YO NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Anchorage Is welded to embedded steel per design.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Sea Comment 2 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
See Comment 2 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
See Comment 2 YO- Nil UO N/AI YO NO UD N/A" YO NO U[3 N/AU YO NO UD N/AU YO NO U-I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 100 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 8 Status: YN NEI UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OIRISA 504 --Equip. Class, Equipment Description
- 4. 16K-V SWITC-HGEAR IJ Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YN NO UDI N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NiJ Un N/AO'and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO UD] NIAO3 YO NOU[3 Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Internals inspection performed to the extent possible.
All visible mounting hardware is Intact and in good condtin. See Comment 2 YO NEIUO Page 101 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of 8 F/'-083S" Status: YO NO U'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1R15AS 04 Equip. Class' 3 Equipment Description 4.16KV SWITCHGEAR IJ Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 1.External Inspection performed on 9/10/12.2.Internals Inspection and anchorage verification was performed to the extent possible.
All front and rear panels were removed and Inspected; however, a second, internal panel was not removed In the rear of the swltchgear.
A review of the associated SEWS packages for 4.16 kV Switchgear shows that QIR15AS04 (WJ) Is bounded by SEWS package for Q 1R15A505 (1K), which is the governing package for all 4.16 kV Swltchgear.
As stated in the SEWS package for Q1R15A503 (1H), additional Inspections were performed to provide a level of confidence that all 4.16 kV Switchgear were installed properly.
An additional conservative anchorage calculation (S0-93-2-8685-001) was performed for six other similar swltchgear using GIP criteria to prove all units had acceplable anchorage.
In total, eight switchgear had visual verification of anchrage which provides a high level of confidence that all swltchgear were Installed properly.3. SWC performed and signed originally on 10/11/13.
Revised and re-signed to provide additional Information on anchorage verification.
Evaluated by: Brian Nelson m g Date: -Y Nikole Arant(U onJ h~~iJ2 Page 102 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-08S (Q.1R15AS04)
Sheet 3 of 7 Page 103 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fi-08S (QlRl5A504)
Sheet 4of 7 Page 104 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-085 (Q1R15AS04)
Sheet 5 of 7 Page 105 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fi-OS (Q1R15AS04)
Sheet 6 of 7 Page 106 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1-085 (Q1R15A504)
Sheet 7 of 7 Page 107 of 217