ML12355A780

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCF164-RPT-01, Version 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report, Rer SNC432467 for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Attachment 3: Seismic Walkdown Checklists, Page 59 of 561 - Page 103 of 561
ML12355A780
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Miktus P
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2266 SNCF164-RPT-01, Ver 1.0
Download: ML12355A780 (45)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of/W S Status: YW2 NF] Ui]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID Nd. Q1E,16H009 Equip, Class', 10 Equipment Decriptioni 600V LOAD CENTER ID ROOM COOLER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 RoomAArea Manufacturer, Modei, Ete. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seisimic WalkdoN6i of Emn item ofequipmnent on the SWEL. The space below each .ofthe following questions may be used to record. the results.ofjudgments andý findings. AdditLioiial space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting 'theer comments-AnChorage

1. Is the. anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the itemone,
  • YND, of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

1 Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yý NE UEI N/AFJ

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YA.NO UD N/A[l oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage'free of-visible cracks~in the concrete near the anchors? Y[6No UE] N!/A0
5. Is th anchorage configuration consistent wiih plant documentation.? Yr$ N'0 U]N/A0 (Note:. This question.only applies i f the item is one of the 50%/o for which: an anchorage configuratidn verification is required.)

Vocc*rrT:ý CW1-c6 '51q4. VDli 6.. Based on the above anchorage. evaluations, is the anchorage free of

,potentially adverse seismic conditions?

tEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 59 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Fl-~A-Sheet 2 of/ 3 Status: Yo NO UZ-Seismild Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipfinent ID No. QIEI6HO69 Equip. Class', 10 Equipiment Description 600V LOAD CENTER 1D ROOM COOLER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? yg N U[]',N/ACI S. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems,ceiling iIles and lighting-. YJ* N. U-1 N/At and masonrybltock walls not likely to collapse oto' the equipment?

9..Do attached lines have adequate ,flexibility to avo.i*d damage? YO NE U. N/AC 1Q..Bas~ed on the aboye seismic interaction evauationsi, is equipment free Yo, NO UCD

,of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Oiber Adverse Conditions

11. Have you Ilooked for and found no other seismic conditions that could. Y NE UC adversely affect th6safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional. pages may be added as necessary.),

Evaluated by: U 0 xi Qj fl( f\A6 (-I a,,,/I Date: ___9& 9 _____

A - HALý?014, Page 60 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 61 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Ft ýý Sheet 1 of-4 Status: YO, NE U--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OtE21FT0940iPkg Equip. Class, 181 F1-23 Equipment Description HIGH HEAD SAFETY INJECTION FLOW TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. ZRoom, 77 Area 111 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (dptional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist, This checklist may be used to document ,the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment ofn: the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided, at the end of this checklist for documenting-otlier comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the. ancihrage configuratioTinverification required (i.e., is the item one YR NEI of le 50M% of SWEL iiems tequiring suph verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN. N: UC N/AC
3. Is the anchorage freeof corrosion that is more.ihan mild surface Ys NEI UC N/:AC3 oxidation?.
4. Is the anchorage.free ofvisible cracks'in ithe concrete near the andhors? YN Nn UC- N/AC
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent,with 1ijant documentation? YI NC-! UC1 N/A (Note: This questiob.only applies if the item is orfe of the 50% for which-an anichorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference U733260 V2

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NCI IC potentially adverse seisniic condiftions?

Enter the. eapipmentvlass ,ani.frdm Appendix B! Class.s of Equtiinewnt.

Page 62 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet,2 of 4 Status: YZ NEI] UEI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QtE21FT0940; Pkt, Equip; Class, 18 FI-23 Equipment Description HIGH HEAD SAFETY INJECTION FLOW TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment-or structures? YO.'NMD UM] NT/AL
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NEI UO] N/AL and masonry block walls not likely to collapse ontothe equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to* avoid damage? YZ NL] UL] N/AL]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEL UL]

of potentially adverse seismic jhteraction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1l; Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NO U]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Note that the second picture shows a bag Iied to the instrument valves.

This is not a seismic concemr Contmentts (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

This package was originallysigned on 8-28-12 but retyped for clarity on 10-15-12.

Evaluated by: L-auf Maclay by Telecon l/ ~ Date; 8/28/12 2ý 8/28/12 I I Page 63 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

-2 3

-ýt Page 64 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 65 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Shoo -Of 3 statu : UD tiE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) Qit~" 3 Equipment lDNo. QIE21HV8152 Equip. CAassl 7 Equipment Description CVCS ISOLATION OUTSIDE CTMTVALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor'El. 100 Room, Area .....

Manufacturern Model, Etc. (optionalbut recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be sed to documeni thie results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The spaceebelow each of the following question'ma y be used to record the results of judgments and findings, Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. is the anchorage configuration verification required (i,e., is:tlie:item one YOENV of~the'50% of SWEL Iite-m eQuirig such euI td)
2. Is~tbe anchorage free, of benlt broken, missing. or loose hardware? YE] N[E Un N/A

/A/- I-

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that Is more than,mild surface YE] )NE tE NIIAC oxidation?
4. Is the aichorage'free of visiblcracks: iii the conci ,ete near the anc hors? YE. NE UI NUA*0N.
5. Is the anchorage configuration cornsistent with plant docurmentation? YD NOE IE N/AtY--

(Note: This question on!y applies T the item is one of the 50%/for whici:ah anchorageconfiguraftiobnverifjcato0ios re uired;)

6, Based on the above anchorago, cvaluations, isithe anchorage free. of yYNNUE0 potentially, adverse seiiniac cdhditi6ns?

'Enter the euipmektclass n~ame ftoffi Aiijndix B:ýCftsses of D uipment?.

Page 66 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 St tSl* f3 Status: YNO] UR']

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1E21HV8152 Equip. ClassW 7 Equipment De criptio !CVCS ISOLATION OUTSIDE CTMTTVALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets fiee fiomn impaict by nearby equipmtent or.structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles anrd lighting, Y CU0 o 1N/.AD and. masonry block walls niqt, likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. iDoattached lineshave adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YrN .UIy NMAO 1.0. Based on theabove seismic i nteraction evaluations,, is equipment free Y0"No U0 _

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1i. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could ).. NC71 U-1 ad~versely affect the safety functionsy fithe equipment?,

Comments (Additiinal pages, may be added as necessayY):

Evaltated by: t. U 4 Date:

Page 67 of 561

  • 0ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .10 02 Page 68 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

'. , ri-?,/

Sheet 1 of/4 Status: YR NDl UD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID N. Q,!E21LoCVo115E Equip. Class, Equipment.Description VCT.OUTLET.ISOLA TION VAL l1E.

Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY FloorEl. 121 Rool Ma nufacturer, Model, ,Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist Thisxchecklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown ofan item:of equipment on the SWEL. T'he space below each of the t0'biiowing questions may be used, to record the results ofjudgments an",

findings. Additionalispace-is provided at the end.of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage 1t Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

rLibc- lt. b, oa c1 0

2. Is the anchorage free.of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NO UE N/A.9
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that. is more than mild surface YE1 NE 130 N/Ap~

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete ncar the anchors? YE NE UE: N/A[I
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE UE NIAJ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuiation verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI U0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment, 1ý111 Page 69 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of -'

Status: Yj. N[], UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1E21LCVO1I5E Equip. Classw 8 Equipment Description VCT OUTLET ISOLATION VALVE, Interaction Effects

7. Are.soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or'struclures? yo NO UC N/AO

.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems. eeilirig tiles And lightingr and masonry block xwalIs not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility t6 avoid damnage? Y [4 NO UC N/AC
10. Based on the above. seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yp NO UC of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have ydu looked. for and found' no other seisjmc conditions that edild YP, NC' tJC adversely affect tlue safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:, Ttp.ff&ALAM' k~LENV., fsL Date: t

. -~i~ Aa IaA/ "AVJc jrc~@

Page 70 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 71 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 t:- -or,

'ý t A 1.

Page 72 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 0

71191 Sheet I of ý"-

Status, YEKNE] Tic Seismic Walkdown Checklist (sWc)

Equipment ID No. Q.1E241M0Vý888 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Decxfiption HHS/ TO RCS COLD LEG ISOLATION Location: Bldgd. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area ) *_z. T--

Manufacturer. Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to docuent The :results of he Seismic Walkdownlof an iten:'of equipment.n the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be usedQto record the results fjudgmerits and,:

findihgs. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for dbcumentinL. other conHnents..

Anchoi~aa~

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.ý is-the item one of the50.% of SWEL items reqniring such vefificaiionl)?

2, Is the-anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose:hardware? YE NE U0. N/A I)L)-. I1A 6-clomPotl,ý I

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is moredihan mild surface YEI NEI UE /ý-

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free.of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YIE .N- UNEN/At'IE

'5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE] liE NIA~vý (Note: This question only applies if the itemh is pnle of the50%'for whichban anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the abov: anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of NE] El potentially adverse.seismic conditions?

1Enter tIhe:equipmentCass name 6fom Appendix B:,Classes of Equipment.

Page 73 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet2.0of3 Status: Y 2 NM UE1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment II) No. QIE21MOV8885 Equip. Class' 8 Equipme~ii~iDescripton HHSI TO RCS COLD LEG ISOLATION, Interaction Effects

7. Aresoft targeis free fromnimpact by nearby equipment or structures? Y93 N UO N/ACI
8 Are-overhead equipment; distribution systems4 .ceiling tiles andfighting,, <-O IJ NIAO and maso-nry bl !odwalls no.t likely to collais&.onto' the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? *YNO uO N/AOE 10, Based on the. above seismic interaction evaluationsi is equipment free, NiOIUC]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects'?

Other Adverse Conditions

1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic condiiions that could NO UC0 adversely al'feci the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added.as necesýAi)

,.2 )

Eva.Iatedby: 1.2

)~~ite:o ___

Page 74 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIOI`*

(

'-N 0

N%

N',

N4 Page 75 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of "

Status: YVn ND UED Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIE21P002A Equip. Class, v,.

Equipment Description CHARGINGIHHSI PUMP P002A Location: Bfldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room,.Area . ...

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optlonal but recomnmended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item, of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgmnents and findings. Additional space is provided: at the end of this checklist for documentting other comments.

Ancborage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verificationrequired(i.e., is the item one Y[* ND
of the50% of SWEL items requiring such verification')?

NM UD N/AD

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that ismore than mild surface ND UD N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage.free of visible cracks in the concrete near ihe anchors? YO ND UD N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEj ND uJD N/AD (Note: Tris question only applies if the item is. one f1the 50% 0 or which an anchorage conifigurAtion verification is required.)

YE(ND UD

6. Basedonthe above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of.

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

SEater the equipment class name ft'om Appendix BWClasses of Equipment:

Page 76 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of X,4 /;

(SWC)I Status: Y[;' N[ U]

Seismic Walkdolwn Checklist Equipment ID No. QIE2IPOO2A Equip. Class. 5 Equipmefit Description CHARGfNG/HHSI PUMPPOO2A TRAIN A Interaction Effects

7. Are.soft targets free from impact iby nearby-equipment dr stru~tuires? YEZ NI] UC N/At]

.8, Are overhead equipment, distributionsystems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NEI Ut] N/AC3 and masonry block walls not tikely to ctllapse qtitothe equipment?

9. Do.aitached'lines haveýadequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yd Nt]I UEj N/A[]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YR(NE UCT
  • ofpotentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and Found no oihei.seismic conditions that cou1d Ya NDL, Ujr adversely affect.the safety functiýns oftthe equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added tas necessary)

,Evaluated by: V iGkS i-lcýcVDate: '6 Or I' V Al1"'

1.rjoide e,aJ .'-

Page 77 of 561

9NT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTSN NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .10 Page 78 of 561

SACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 0 1-1 V)

I--

Page 79 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

'Sheet 1 ofx 7 Status: Y0 Nil] U0E Seismic Walkddwrn' Checklist.(SWC)

Equipment IDNo. QIF16LT0502 Equip -Classl, 1_8 Equipment Description RWST LEVEL TRANSMITTER' Location: Bldg. YARD - F-loorEl. 155 Room, Area .. dr 1Mdanufacturer, Model, Eib..(optional but recommended) instructions for Completing Checklist This checklistmay be used to document the results of the SeismictWalkdown of anitem of equipment on the SWEL; The space below each:of the f6llowing questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional spacejs provied at the end of this-checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. isthe anchorage configuration verification requiredý(i.e., isýithe item one of the 50% of SWLitems.requiring such vecation)?
2. Is the anchoragen free of bent, broken, missing orloose hardware?

YlINq UDC N/AD

3. Is'the anchoragefree of corrosionthatis more thanmild surface oxidation?
4. Is'the 'anchorage free of'visible:cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y IN UC NiAD
5. Is the anchorage enfiguration!consistent with plant documentation? Y" rNO U"I NiAC-(Note: quton onlyohis applies ..f thoeitem is one of the 50%, :for which an anchorage configuration verification is required)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations., is the anchorage free of yff.N6 UD

'potefiiially adverse seismicýconditions?

.. sner theequipment'class name 'fromn Appendix, : Classes of Euipment,.

Page 80 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Shetet of% I Sltatus: YIŽý NOl U[]

Seismic Walkdown :Checklist (SWC)

Equipment'lD No. 0IF16LT0502 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description RWSTLEVEL TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects:

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or.structures?; yfj/N UD N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NO U] N/AD and.masonry block walls not likely to collapsewonto the equipment?
9. Do attached fines have adequate. flexibility to, avoid damage? Yg24/) UO N/AD
10. Based Ion theabove seismic interactiondevaluations, is equipment free: Y ND U of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions/

Ii. Have You looked for andfoundno other seismic conditions tlbatcouid Y NOD UD adversely'affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

. A Cý e .r...?

Evaluated by: AgL.ofV. Q~,46 13LbDDD ý4 1 'U ,0 DateW .)J

~~A.~~ ~ N .£ V t Page 81 of 561

9 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 rN Page 82 of 561

m z

--i 51?

CO, 0

z m

C)

I-i C,)

(D 00 0) z 0

z

)

"a m z

ATCHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION .0 G

U' Page 84 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 85 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 86 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Status: Y M U0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIF1I6TO501 . Equip. Class' 21 Equipiment Descriptiin REFUELING WA TER'STORAGE TANK ...

Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 155 Room, Area ...K&[i "[ __... ..

Manufacturerý Model, Etc. (optional. but recommended) instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist mav be usedto document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item ofequipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used torecord the results ofj udgments and findings..Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for docuamenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such-Verification)?

-. ~IsC the g by.t

'e b en 5io 2,Is the anchorag feof bent, broken, missing or loose.hard .ware? El*U T.

J El N/AE

3. is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild'surface 4 Y* 1 UlD N/AD oxidation'?
4. is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concretenear the anchors? Y[3.ND U- N/AD L10.5., A'4. C/ŽL 5 /50095 /~rA-) 7h e,-3 Vj"' /K 9 2 £6

. Is. the anchorage configuration: consistent with plant documentation? 92 -NIDýX-J0 N/AD3 (Note: Fhis question only applies. if the item is one Of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based onthe aboveanchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y{6I"ND [ID potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the eouipnmext class name from~ Appendix 13:Classes df Equijtrncnt.

Page 87 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheel 2 0fZI(.P Status: '* NETD. U-'

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Eqliipmneit j]DNo. QIFI6TO501, Equip. Class' 21 EquipmentDescription RýEFUEL/NG WATER STORAGE:.TANK Interaction Effects

7. Are'soft targetsfree from impac(by-ncarby equipmeent or structures? Y.] U[E] 'N/Af 8,: Are overhead equipmentt, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y.ND. UJE N*/AAE aind~masonry block walls not likely to,collapse onto the.equipmeinnt?
9. Do atta hed lines hae adeq uate flexibility to avonid amage? x~lDU[3'N/IA 10.. Based on the above,seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Vk(NfTJ urn of potentiallyadverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 11.. laveyou:looked for and.found no other seismic condlitions that .could V2NNE UEI-adversely affect the'safety functions of tie equipment?

Commentsý (Additional, pages may be added as necessary):

'Evaluated by:

T

.J-Date:

9., 9,-41 o Page 88 of 561

0 w

U-0~

z U)

(0 z 0) 00 (1) cm ca CL 0

w z

9 0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

.5

  • 1 Page 90 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheetiof 4 Status: YZ 7rNL] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIG31HOOIB Equip. Class' 21 Equ*phient D)escription SPENT FUEL POOL HEAT EXCHANGER TRAIN A Location: Bldg. A loor El.

FŽ_ Room, Area __'_-,_-__________

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instruction§.for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used-to document the results of the Seismicq Walkdown of an item of equiPment on the SWEL. Tie space below each 6f the:followingquestions may be used-to record the results ofjudgmentt and findings. Additional:space is provided at. the end of this checklist fordocumeniting other commients, Anchorage I, Is the-anchorage confi aration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%, of SWEL items requiting such verification)?

71--17&548 1iv

2. Is the anchorage free.of bent, broken, miissing*6rloose. hardware? YH"ICEJ UEJ N4/AE]
3. Is the ainchorage free of corrosi.on thatis more than mild surface. LN6UfJ N/AFLJ oxidation?

r,-

o3r *-

4. Is the antchorageflree of visible~cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Ygr'NE- U0E N/AEJ
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent, with plant documentation? Y9<0 UEJ N/A[l (Note: This question only appliesif the item is one~of the 50% for.

which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anachorage evaluations, is the andchorage free of OE4 NUn potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I.Ent& the equipment class name from Appcndix B: Classes of Equipment, Page 91 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Status: Y i]N[ 'U]

Seismic Walkdown Ch.ecklist (SWC)

Equipment lD.No'., QIG31HOQIB Equip. Class, 21 -

'EJquipment Description SPENT FUEL POOL HEAT EXCHANGER TRAIN A Interaction Effects:

7. Are soft targets firee from impact by nearby eqijpment or structures? Y NE UD N/AE
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles arid lighting, and masonry block walls not iik..Yto collapse onto the equipment?

W~NE' UM, N/AE1

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoidodamage? Yin/ -oU N/AM 10.. Based on,the above, seismic interaction evaluationsis equipment free */NE] UE-

,of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?'

OtherAdverse Conditions 11 .. Havee you lookdd for and found no other seismic cbnditions that could YI"NE1l UM adversely.,affectithe safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additidial pag6s may be added as necessary)

/VAL, Evaluated by: 5C~ 1 1b Le Iz/ a-. Date: SýZ--

Page 92 of 561

ATTAC-MENT 3 SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Page 93 of 561

.m ...Wý

0 m

z C--

Cl, 0

r-0 z

m I-U3 CD (0

0' 0

C/,

z 0

z

-1, 0)

,-4 6

m 0

z C)

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet iof I' 4'9 JI Status: YO NM IU Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SNWC)

EquipmentlD No. 0IHIlNGASC2506C Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description AUX SAFEGUARDS CABINET C Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor EL. 155 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructionsfor Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Sei.smic Walkdown of an item of equipmeht on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions.may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is proyided at the end of this checklist for documienting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the:antliorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y NE of the 56% of SWEL itemns requiring such verifiIeation)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bentý broken, missing or loose hardware? 1Y[RNE UE N/AE
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YI'Ef NOEU N/AO oxidation?
4. Is;Jhe anchorage free of visible cracks in the concretenear the anchors? YU3° NI UED N/AE
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? ,YINE UE N/AEA (Note: This question only applies if the item. is one of the 50% for w,hich an anchorage conifiguratiofi.v°erifikati6n is required.)

&6..Based on, the above anchorage evaluationsi is the anchorage free of. Y NEJ UVE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

1

."Entcrthe equipment class name 'from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 95 of 561

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 F 1-3I(

Sht e2 1 of/ 9 AAp f

status* N[D UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklistj(SWC)

EquiprmentflDNo. QIH11NGASC2506C` Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description AUX SAFEGUARDS CABINET C, Interaction Effects

7. Are s'of targets freefroim impact bynearby equipment or structures? UE/14 Tn N/Anj
8. Are: overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y Q'Nr7IU*1J N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse. onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have, cequate flexibility to, avoid damage? Y, INE1 U0J N/AQ3
10. Bascd on the aboe seismic interaction evaluations, is1equipment r: 0 NOFjUEJ Ofpotntially advere seismieinteraction effects?

Other Akdverse. Conditions IT. Have you looked for and found no other seismic, conditions, that could .YE{N,0 UJJ7 adversely affeit the safety fufctiohis of tie ,equipment?

Comments! (Additional pages rmay be added as necessary)

Date:

Page 96 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONql Page 97 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONI

.11 Page 98 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 10 Page 99 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIO*

Page 100 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION*

IQ 7~

Page 101 of 561

9 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS T

Page 102 of 561

9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSIONO Page 103 of 561

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12355A780&oldid=2458875"