NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 562

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 562
ML14071A075
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/20/2014
From:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A075 (38)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Hl- 1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0SH21E525.

Pkq Fl-105 Sheet 1 of to 7,J M Status: Y[ N[] U[]Equip. Classi 20 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1-2A LOCAL CONTROL PANEL Location:

Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area 61 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

See SEWS for QSH21E525A (Diesel Generator 1-2A Local Control Panel) for details.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YE NE YZ NEI U[3 N/AE-YZ NEI UI- N/A[-4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[ NEI UE- N/AD 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NEI UH N/AD YZ NEI U-1 IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 463 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sr -ls Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSH21E525, Pka FI-105 Sheet 2 of )lIC*X Status: YU NE] Ur1 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1-2A LOCAL CONTROL PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Tubing too close to piping, see pix, entered in CAP (CR505553, CR504972)Y[ ND UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[D NE] Ut] N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

nothing noted overhead that can collapse, see #7.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?electrical, tubing, ppg insp;ected

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?see #7 Y0 NDI UD N/AD YNEIND UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

nothing found, see AWB fpor Rm 189 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

See component QSH22L502 for AWC This package was originally signed on 8-29-12 but retyped for clarity on 10-23-12.9 iidiili2~L.,,I4 U Y.U. rvcJR , Vauu allI myV I 01WL AJII / 1 ,I I'Date: 8/29/12 8/29/12 Page 464 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 r-- k atD -o0ci'ý ",, 4t> (-IdY)< p-4,-) 9/2#Lh Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSH21E525 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1-2A LOCAL CONTROL PANEL'I Sheet 1 of-a.Status: Y, NE] uF]Location:

Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 15,' Room, Area 0061 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchornee 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Ne..l Sev-4S ý. C.M2A -k 1FS25A 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YgNO Y)21 NE UO N/AO Y;E'ND UD NIAO Y/E(NO UO N/AO Y)!fND UO N/AOUO' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 465 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSH21E525 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1-221 LOCAL CONTROL PANEL"7 Sheet)a of--Status: 7 N[] UI'Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution.systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y/NO Ur N/A" Y4'NO UO N/AO Y&fNO UO N/Ar YgZ( NO UO Other Adverse Conditions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

ommentsL(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

AWN C~ear-YN-

&,en V4i-2L'&D2 p'0r', c,.F& , 4-c '.. c- ar" sch0' .,..4cr,",ol$.

Evaluated by: R&*, /- , Date: I I / L-rYL,,,. \jVA,1/.Y

-%ýr ýJý' e.6 CI-.1 C/1 Page 466 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 467 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 4 "1 Page 468 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 469 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS r-- I -t_ 1,% %NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 470 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS r-- I _ wrv_1 -m 3....NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0.k --7 -7 Page 471 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Shees: I oU' -Status: Y[5' ND] Url:e(- JoG Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ýc Ql E1 ' 2 Equip. Class'__ __Equipment Description

\T) PQW (O k'QU MDrt IC (Q M- Q01AA11A X~~Location: 9- Floor El. Room. Area ___Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is theitem one YO No, of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

sp_~ Q-C\~S~e ~ o E 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YaNO] UQ N/AQ YdNo UO N/AD YE"NO U- N/AD YD ND U" N/A@" Y&'N- L To ItLivr the equipimet class ntame From Appendix B; Classes of fiquipiuent.

Page 472 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 nI -m Status: NO U4 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSH21E528 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR IC LOCAL CONTROL PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y&'N" U' N/AD Y0"NrD UM N/AD Y91N0 UF- N/AD3 Y["NI- UD-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YWN-' UD adversely affect the safety finetions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

~r ~Date; 9 1 Page 473 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 YI-Page 474 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0~Vv-~cA- U c~f~Page 475 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSH2IL5,3B Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SERVICE WATER B TRAIN BATTERY ROOM HVAC LCS Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y91 NEI Ut]Location:

Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area " , C.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instrucdiom for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorase 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YD NQ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YTP ND UE] N/AD YWND UID N/AD 4. Is the anchorage free ofvisible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y27' NO UD N/AO 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NO UD N/A9 Y0 NDI LD IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 476 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F k I -cY Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSH21L5O3B Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description SERVICE WATER B TRAIN BATTERYROOM HVA_,S Sheet 2 ofd4-Status: Q N] UE]Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YVP NC UC N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, No N[C UC N/AC1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Y? NE UC N/AD , 10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y) NO UC of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions 11, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Ytf NC UC-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: O'Lq LauýY6 Uctaj V ~ ¶Date: 2...Ot.1 Z612-Page 477 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 478 of 562 LIP~ CkIf'~4~A DDT Al ~IfD~IC~M

~ A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS

,4u. oi~r 1u-r -...0A&OV Page 479 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-voS Sheet I of 3 Status: YN NFI UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0SH22L502 Equip. Class' Q2-0 Equipment Description DIESEL LOCAL RELAY PANEL 1-,2A Location:

Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area 0061 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y0 NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of conrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Qe+, -6 gwc Pxt-e caakrcx3 W*1(4t4.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YZ NO uO N!AO YO NO U- N/AQ YO NO UO N/AO YZ NO UO N/AO YZ NO UO Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 480 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 FI-10 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ Nr- U["-Equipment ID No. 0SH22L502 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description DIESEL LOCAL RELAY PANEL 1-2A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yo NC UD N/Ar-There is a 1/2" gap between panel and QSH21E525.A.

Panel E525-A is very long in that direction and can expect to have negligible deflections.

The Diesel Local Relay Panel will also have small deflections as it is restrained by four anchor bolts and rigid conduits at the top of the panel. Therefore, this is seismically adequate.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NO U177 N/A'and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YZ NEI UO N/AC 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions 11, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0Z NO UI]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All IPEEE concerns were resolved.

A new anchor bolt was added to the outside of the panel to resolve the missing anchor bolt found in the IPEEE walkdowns.

Also, overhead lights have been adequately restrained, therefore this configurations is judged to be free of seismic interaction.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

PSZ1 vrw-oA 111htir" wecw-ed %W i c 1ot-01 ' 601 o4Ca kt, 7,1%c'. 0+-W-41N r' 4A%* Qwo* Vw,4 0q ,,,h,,t-4 h ,ý Th'., A AA,".Iki.17 1' ZiL ..c7 J Laura Maclayl / IIAAAO=V1( QAJ Date: 8/3012012 8/30/2012 Page 481 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS I- I- lo8 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 wk 9 q- og Page 482 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: YE N[] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSR42B516 Equip. Class 1 20 Equipment Description UNIT 1 SERVICE WA TER BATTERY FUSE BOX TRAIN A Location:

Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area 74 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraze 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y%" NC of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

$'J\4 ýAtd&¶.. cdavej 4#1~4 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y NEI UC N/A]Yk NO UC N/AC YA NC UC N/AC YtNO UC N/AC YI No UC IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 483 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSR42B5f6 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description UNIT I SERVICE WA TER BA TTERY FUSE BOX TRAIN A Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y9 NEI UE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y 7 M NO UONIAO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[J ND UD N/AD_and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

C'9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yjl NDI UD N/AD I~ NO U0 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YK Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A wmik--bq irn c cje-- FR-)t 1 PI-m3, E- y-'- (sw4Icqy-l Evaluated by: V~4 4 .1 MCw)I j4%\Date: S b-01 I 12-I 72\JXJ ~a Page 484 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 485 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Yt Nj] UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSR42B520B Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SW BA TTERY NO. 3 OR 4 DETECTION CABINET Location:

Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area -Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgrments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

r 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yý NO U N/AQ I NO UC N!AQ YýN- UIE] N/AD YE] NO E NAp Y NO UD I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 13: Classes of Equipment.

Page 486 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 f-I jO Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y1)NMN Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSR42B520B Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description SW BA TTERY NO. 3 OR 4 DETECTION CABINET Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

A -Ut N/At]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y N] -U] N/At]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?,Nt-] Ut] N/At]Nt-] ULI]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could E'Yl(NI] Ut]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:; U4,I X MkA CA CIA Date: q/frltp I z l'] ,,--Y -(/I/Page 487 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 488 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i Status: Y[O NE] U[]Equipment ID No. WSR42B523B Equip. Class, 15 Equipment Description 125 VaC SERVICE WATER BUILDING BATTERY NOd2 Location:

Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area -74 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraie 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y; N]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Yýý NI Ur-1 N/A[]YP NCI U0 N/AD 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y NOI U- N/AI 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YI NI Ur- NWAD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YKNO U'potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 489 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofX4 Status: YkNE UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSR4285238 Equip. Class' 15 Equipment Description 125 VDC SERVICE WATER BUILDING BATTERY NO. 2 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y¥ NO U1 N/A]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, N!6NO U-] N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

V 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YQNE UD N/ACD YlNE U" Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y* No UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

PN-ee ~ t 4sliC gx\ I Evaluated by: ' p/LM '/ Ia I(AUU-n kAaCiQu/V I A Date: SPA 11'2-Page 490 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS

,/- //I NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 491 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS

51- I1i NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 492 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3
SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 fIdiZ-Sheet i of,04 Status: YANO[ UrE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSR42B525A Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SW BUILDING A TRAIN BATTERY SEL SW Location:

Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area -74 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 912A I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN 1`00 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

&ArtbMA4 Ckhi~ied -to '--el; Cts it I c v1ci5Ic 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? UD N/AO 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yý NO UD N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y5 N] U[- N/AD 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Ytý NI] U- N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Iw, £4... o'f: kii.v b0erg._ kitt co --t4-(L-.S I.pt s 4'V *0" ~ffr& V'6. Based on the above anchorage evauatiols, is the ancl orage free of NEI UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 493 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of/ 4 Status: I NEI UL-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSR42B525A Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description SW BUILDING A TRAIN BATTERY SEL SW Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting.and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentiafly adverse seismic interaction effects?Yý ND UD N/AD Yt NO UD N/AD YO4 NO UD N/AD YUND UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[* N U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: (~ A.C V Date: eQ-/IZ'4 jZ ?Page 494 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNUI-F14-1ITI-U1, Vr0I.UN Z.U Page 495 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 496 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 , I , I Sheet 1 of/ 4 Status: YN NEI Uv-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSR42B5268 Equip. Class' 16 Equipment Description DIESEL WATER BUILDING BATTERY CHARGER NO. 2 (STANDBY)Location:

Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area 72D Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other conunents.

Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Y0 NO UC N/AC YZ NO UC- N/AO 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO N- UC N/A[C]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Drawing U-732799 Version 1.0 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN NO UC N/AC YN N" UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 497 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 0 Status: YZ NM UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSR42B526B Equip. Class' 16 Equipment Description DIESEL WATER BUILDING BATTERY CHARGER NO, 2 (STANDBY).Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YN NE UI- N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NQl UQ N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead lighting is attached by conduit and hooks which does not meet the requirement for a positive end connection.

However decking above prevents hooks from coming disengaged.

This is judged to not collapseon any equipment.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO UE N/AF YZ NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEI UE" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 4m oLt-W La V (nutwA M 0L cuw A -Pmutow Date: '91-34>112

\I(VG -61 I I Page 498 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 499 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0!Page 500 of 562

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-14-0249,_Joseph_M._Farley,_Unit_1,_Enclosure_2,_Updated_Farley_Unit_1_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic_Through_Attachment_3_Page_463_of_562_Through_500_of_562&oldid=877004"