ML13004A258
| ML13004A258 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 11/26/2012 |
| From: | Miktus P Southern Nuclear Operating Co, Southern Co |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NL-12-2267 SNCF164-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0 | |
| Download: ML13004A258 (66) | |
Text
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walk.down Chiecklist (SWC)
StaItus:
N~
1 fJ4 A'2 Equipment ID No. Q2PI 7HV3095
- .Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Desci ption CCW SUPPLY TO EXCESS LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER Location:.dg.
AUXILIARY Floor El.PLIL Z ROOm, Area 2 Z"
3.
Manufactiftrr, Model, Etc. (optiofial but recoinindoded) histructionsti for CompletingCbheckist This checkdist may be used to document the results.of the Seismic Walkdown of an itern of equipment on the SWEL..le space below each of the following questions maoybe used to recordi the results ofjudgmqnts~and
,findings.; Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for d6Lumenting other comments.
Ahchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification'fequired'(i.e.,is theitem one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verificatiogi)?
1 Is the. anchorage free of bent, bro1en, missing or loose hardware?
YE]Njý YEI NCI U NT/A1C-
/rIV L IAJf-6A6-V67-
- 3. Is *he Anchorage free of corrosion'that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. !Stieanchorage free ofvisible cracks in the concrete nearothe anchors?
5.ts theanichurage configuration consistent with plant documenihtion?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is, one of toe 50%:for which an Anchorage coffiguration verification is tequired) 6.. Based on the above anchorag-e evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially'adverse seismic conditions?
YD NEI lID N/A,-'*
YDK NDI, U0 N!.a_-/
yD` NDI U0 v/u
'Enti mE k aepnimn~t assnanic frorn Apprad Iix tB: Clioses o.f IEqyipment, Page 307 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 Of 4AV Status: YJ2'N IF! U0, Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No, Q2P17HV3095; Equip. Class".7,..,.........................
Equipment Description CCW SUPPL Y T& EXCESS LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER InteraCtion Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free, fbrominpact by nearby equipmem or structures?
Y[<N4 U0 N/AD
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceilingtiles'andlighting, Y[NE UN N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipmenln?
- 9. Do attached, lines have a diquateflexiBility. t0 avoid damage?
YVN UEt N/AE3 10A Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YW /l UD of potentially adveise seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions I11 Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y
U adersely affect the safety fnctions of the equipment?
(1.Com-.Vments I(Additionat pages may be added a., necessary)
/
0
.j Evalhited by*
-T Ai Date:
Z
'/,
Page 308 of 467
A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS s
0S NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 309 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 310 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of P Statu~s: Y9, NEI ULI1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment lD No. Q2P17HV3096B Equip. Classi 7 EquitpmentDescription CCWNON-SAFETY ISOLATION Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area
_21 tI_
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on-the SAWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the fesuet ofeudgiments and findings. Additional space-is provided at. the.end of thischecklist for documentingother comments.
Anlo~rage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e,, is the item one YE l N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring.such verification)?
YEine NE E
/
- 2. Isthe anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
YE] No UtE N/A4
- 4. Is the anchorage free~ofVisible cracks in the concrete near the anchor?
E NE UJE N/Aq S. Is the Anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based.on the above anchbrage evaluations, is the anchorage: free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YE1 NEI UrE
.YAW Y,N1 '
IEnter the equipment class name foom Appendix B: Classes ol Equipment.
Page 311 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 20 of 4
Status: Y11 N UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Lquipment
) No. 02P17H.3U06B Equip. Ciass, 7 Equiient Deseripton CCW NON.SAFEýY ISOLA TION Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structuies?
Y ' ND]. UO] N/AD S. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y.
NO U-] N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto. the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
- 10. Based on, the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic in-tetaction effects?
Y0 ND UD N/AD Y'NO UD Other Adverse Conditions 1 V. Have you.looked forand found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affectithe safety functions of the equipment?
Y NEI uD Commnentsý (Add itinai pages taybe added as necessary)
Evaluated by:,
pages Air{ay ba asc eaLaw-a moilcia'/
V.)
K ~
~
A l h~~vwdFm Date Page 312 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0
,m -I c)'
Page 313 of 467
p 0
0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 314 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet-iofg Z
'i Status: YE!ý*NDL7 l Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ]D:No. Q2P17MOV3f85B Equip.-Class' 8 Equipment Description CCW INLET TO RHR HEAT EXCHANGER NO., 2 Location: Bldg. AUXILARY Floor EL. 83 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc, (optional but recommended)
'Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may beusedto docunaent the results ofth Seisnic Walkdow***!f*iitem of equipment:6niihe SWXEL The space belbw each of the followinrg questionsmay beused to r cbrd the results ofjudgments:and findings. Additional space is:provided at the end ofthis chiecklist for docuimmting other comaents.
Anchorage I, Is the anchorageconfiguration v*erification-required.(i.e., is the item one YE). N[E of the 50% of SWELbitemsrequiring liVcerification)?
- 2. Is thleanchorage free of ben*t, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3; Is the anchorage free ofcorrosion that is-more than mild surface oxidation?
4; Is the anchorage free:of visible eracks:in the concrete near the anchors7 51 Is theanchorage. configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note' This question only applies if th itemf is one 6fthe 50% for which an anchorage configuration Nverific~ation is required.)
6-Based On theabove ancho'age eyatuations, is he anchorage. free of potentially adverse sew-nisr onditons?
YE NE, UE. N/Ag YE NE1 :UE N/AQ(
YE NE UE. N*/A, 1/
YE,NEn UEI N/AQ1 YtY'ND UE3 Enter thequiprnrnt elass hafinc ftorAppendii, C3lnasss of Eq 9i Ofmet.
Page 315 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 31-4(
Sttitus: Y[ý NEW ULIE 12J Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment EQ No. Q2P17MOV3185B Equip. Class' 8 Equipmeneit Description cCW INLET TO RHR HEAT EXCHANGER NO. 2 inteisfctiofi Effects
- 7. Are soft:targets free from imtnaet by nearby equipment or structures?
Y[2/N[
UE-' N/AE
- 8. Areoverhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling. tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
.9. Do attached lines have adequate. flexibility to avoid damage?
- 10. Based on'the above seismicinteraction evaluations, is equipment free of potentitlby adverse seismic interaction effects?
Yff NO UE) N/A01I YIYNE UEP N/AE)
YnNO UEJ Other Adverse Conditidns l.1.Have you looked foi-and found noother seismic conditionsthat could Y[A' N-.U.E adv9rselyaffect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additionalpages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Date:
.___,___/_.
Date
~t~PIA~A) ThAiQ Page 316 of 467
A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 317 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 318 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0
/ -t5 Sheet i ofsrq Status: &ND UED Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No..Q2P17PR01C Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description CCW PUMP 2C TRAIN A SLocatim Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 2,_
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional butreconmnended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist. may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown.of an item of equipment onthe SwEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of thisechecklist for documenting other comnlents, Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (ie., is the item one of the: 50%:ofSWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose liardWane?
- 31 Is the anchorage free of corrosion that!is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the cofic'ete bear the anchors?
5, Is the anchorage configuratibn consistent With:plant documentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
ý6 Bascd on the above ancho jrfage evalhhtions, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse:seismic conditions?
Y*, ND3 Y
NE U[D N/AD-Y6NDT-U0 N/AD 7
N7 UDIN AD Enter the equitpment class namer *f.om Appendix B: Clisses of Equipment.
Page 319 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of24 Status: AN IJ-DU Seism.ic Walkdown, Checklist (SWC) v,
I -I Equipment lD~o. Q2P17POO1C Equip. Classl 5 Equipment Description CCWPUMP 2C TRAIN A
.Interaction Effects
,7. Are soft targets free from impact by bearby equipment or structuires?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distrib~htion sytem.ns, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to c6lapse onto the equipment.
- 9. Do attached lines'have adequate flexibilit*2 to avoiddamage?
- 10. Based on the above seismicifiiteraction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
ýy NO~ U1 N/A[-l 1160N UCI NIAQI
ý,,lUEl N/AQ r
ND UfJ
- Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. HIaveyouJooked.for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additionalt Pages m~ty be added as necessary)
YYI??\\NEDUC Am! V01"~2. f~or h~txorr 15 is WrTh-h colciev F --
(
P17 x:
-6
-l Evalu aedbr 9Q Ik!
Date:
v i Page 320 of 467
0 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 321 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 322 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sbeetj ofK Status: IYfR ND-uED Seismic Walkdown Checklist.(SWC)
Equipment IID No.,
2PI7TO01 Equip. Class. 21 Equipment Description SURGE TANK (CCW).
Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY FloorFJ. 179.
Room. Area
- 2.
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but~recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be.used-to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an iten of eq ipment on: the SWEL. Thespace below each of the followoing questions mnav be used to record the res iits of jud
- e ts and findings. APdditiria I pace is provided at the end bf this ehckilist. for documenting othicent,.
Anchoraoe I. ýIs the anchorage configuration verification required (i.c:,:is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3 Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?.
YIVND Y
ND[
UD] N/ADI YE NO UD N/AD
- 4. Is the anchoragefreeof visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
Y ND U[I N/AD
- 5. is the anehorage efnfigurationconsisten withplant documenheijon?
-Y[ý ND UODN/A[D (Note!] Thisquestion only applies if the iten is oe of the 50 /.
r which ht c:iorage configuration vcrificatpno is required.)
& Based oýnthe above an¢horage evaluations, is the anchorage frec of Y0 1 ND1 UD potentialby aderse seisilic conditionis).
' Enpicr.thie iquipiient eldss hi IMefrofn Appiidix B: Clamsss of Et hipyn:li.
Page 323 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic:Walkdown.Checklist (SWC)
Sheet 2 of,3 Status: Y0 NM UID EquipmentlDNo. Q2P17T001 Equip. Class'.21 Equipment Description SURGE, TANK_&
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft-targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8-Are, overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling.tiles and lighting, and masonry block. walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment ffeez of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Y91 NEI J DO N/AFJ YEI NO UO0NUAO Yd2 NEI UO N/AD YO'NO 130 Other Adverse Conditions I., Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equiptnent?
Y.NEI UM Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
vi)'{
~ 14 ~
0A At Page 324 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 325 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 326 of 467
C ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 327 of 467
C ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 328 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ISheet 1o o4 4 Status: Y[Z N.F uD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.
Q2P18CO02B Equip. Class' 12 Equipment Description TRAIN"B EMERGENCY AIR COMPRESSOR
- tocation: Bidg, AOXILIARY. FloorEl. 100 Room,.Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (6ptional but recommended)
Instructions for CompletingChecklist This checklist may be used to document-the.results of the Seismic Walkdownbf an item of 6quipiment on the, SWEL Trhe space beloideach of the f6llowing questions may be used to record the results 01judg-nqnts and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for dbeomenting lther cOmments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Ye. N.]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiting.suchi verification)?
S"'S. F2<
- 2. is the ancliorage free.of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is the anchorage free of:corrosion thais more than mild surface oixdation'?
YfNO] VI N/AF1 YiK'NI VI] N/AO 4, Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
YZ'NI] U9 N/AEI
.5..
s the sancihorage configurat!:on contsiýen,.t, iih plantdocumentation?
N Note: This question only applies if thie :itim is oneof the 50% for which an anchorage;configuration vefieation is required.)
- 6. Based on the above; anchone ge evaluations is the anchorage free of pomentially adyerse seismic eonditions?
YV.'NO' V] N/AC7 YjýNEI UI]
-iueuisn cln liiefiV61mAp~p~dit B:. Cklseiofidtie Page 329 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Shtt.2 of-At-A Statuls:ý Yýo !NFl j Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SVVC)
Equipment iD No.
02PM8C6028 Equip; Classl' 12 Equipment Description TRAIN 8 B EMERGENCY. AIR COM6PRESSOR Interaction Effects
- 7. Are:sof targets free fromi mp ct byQearby equipment or structures?
Y[/ND U-N/AD
- 8 Are overhead equipment, dsttihutioisystems, ceilng tiles and lighting, Y:f ND 137 U
N/AE]
and mbasonry block walls notý ikely to collapse onto the equipment?
9: Doattached lines have adequate~flexibility toavoid dmage?
Y NDI UD N/AD
- 10, Based on the above seismic interaction eyaluations, is equipment free 4
ND UD of potentially adverse seismnic iteraction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions Ii, Have you looked ibr and ftouni no Other seismic conditions that could Y
ED UD adversely affect =the safety fntiont of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary).
\\'r&o-
~~Q Icqh~ky
$k~
5 Ws Ac(
is
~
~
Q(~A~ v~Ž~N3~-
(1I~ (bAr cqi~h.,.
Page 330 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0
- 1 Page 331 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 332 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sha et ofa-Status: Y NO 0$t Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment It) No. 02PIgHV3611 Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description CTMTINSTAIR ISO Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY FloorEl 100 Room, Area 2
2-. &
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing.Checklist This ch*cklist.may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the.
SWEL. The space below each of the, following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional spaceis provided at the end ofthis checklist for documenling other comments.
Anchorape 1, Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the itemn one of the 50% of SWEL items'requiringsuch verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Isfthe anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Isthi anchorage free of visible cracks intie concrete near the anchors?
- 5. Is the anchorage corliguratiom consistenit with plant documentation?
(Not. IThis questiononly applies if theitemeis one of the 50%:for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6..Based on toe above anichlorage evaluatiblns, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
YEJ.,
YEI NBD U NIAV
-Y NB D130 NWAE YO NEI UB NUAV YEB NBI U0NE n MYE(L 1 lI
'Ester the'eqtiiipnent class Ymmecfrom Appendix B: Clas~ses of Eqaiprnent, Page 333 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
NO. SNCFI64-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheeta2Ox Status:
NO NU ý Equipment ID No, Q2Pg19HýV3611.
Equip, Cla*s§ 7
Equipment.Descripti6n CTM.T INSTAIR ISO Interaction Effects-
- 7. Are soft targetsfree, from impact by nearby equipment, or trutctures?
8".. Are'overhead equipment; distribfution systems; ceilng.1tiles and iHghting, and nasonry blockwvrallg not likel to collMtse onto theequipment?
9'. Do attached lines have adequateflexibility to avoid damage?
- 10. Based on the above seismic, interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Y[1N0 UD N/AD Y*.NO UD N/ADO YIA'ND UD N/AD YS6 Dý0 o Other Adverse Conditions 1:1, H avc'ygu lo.1okd for and fdund no othr.seisinic conditionsthat could adversely.aff"ect the s'afety functions of the equipment?
Y[/ND liD Comments (AdditioIn pages may be addedsa, hece,"a.ry)
Eva luated by PAi k-t2
$i~A~k; Date:;
Page 334 of 467
3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 335 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 336 of 467
A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 337 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Sheet i of 4 Status: YN NE UV]
Equipmcent.I No. Q2R11B507, tk F2-L Equip. Class_ 4 89
.Equipment Description LC TRANSFORMER 2S Location: Bidg, DIESEL Floor El, 155 Roomh, Area 560 Mauufacturdri Model, Etc. (optional but recornmended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This cheeklist:may be usedo docuneit, the -esults of the Seismic Walkdown of an itenm of eqiuipment oi the SWEL. The:space b'low each of the following questions may beused to record the results ofjudgents and findings. Additional space is.provided at the end of this checklist for. docutnenting.other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuratioi veriticatioi required (i.e., is the item one *YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items rcquirilnguch verification)?
- 2. Is, he anchorage, free of bent,; broken; missing or loose hardware?
3-.is the anchorage free of con'osion that is more than mildasurface oxidation?
4.s Ithe anchorage~free'Vfv. isiblh.cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration ~cAis with plant documnentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the iten mis ofne of ihe 50% for Whicih an anchorage con figuration, verificationis required.)
Reference SEWS package dafed5.28-94 6, Based on the above anchorage evaluationsis the anchorage free of potentia*ily,.adverse seismic conditions?
YZ NO] LIE NIAE]
YS NO, UO N/AE]
YLZ NE] UiE N/AD YD NO] LIE N/AED YO NO UE
.I.Entec the equipmien Class namie from Appendlix i3:..Clss~s~of Fquiprimin.
Page 338 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Waikdown Checklisi (SWC)
Sheet 2 of 4 Status:. YN NE] U-EquipmentlDIN.
Q2R81..
B507 NRF2-Equip. Class' 4 Equipment Description LC TRANSFORMER2S NIteractioni)Effects
- 7. Are soft targets fr~e fromn impact by neaaiby equipment orstructures?
YN NEI UO N/AO 8: Are overhead eqluipmient, distributi6o systems, ceiling tiles~and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipmen?.
- 9. Doattached lines thave adequate~fleibitity toavo'iddamage?
- 10. ýBased On tie above seismiic intetadti6iheValuuitibns, is equipment flee of potentially adverse seismicqinteraction effects?
Y¥.N[
UO N/AE1 Y* :N UO NIAD Yv NrO, UO]
Other. Adverse Conditions 11, ia-vew you Iobked f4r and fO t
odiofbt0slieigsmiic. c6nditionisthd(tc61ifd Y
NO l: UD adversely affect the:safety.funttions of the equipment?
Cbmnents:(Additioial.pagesrmay be added asinetesary)
Opening the transformer'for internal in~spection is considered disassembly.
This package Was ori7inally signed on 8z24412 but retyped for clarity on: 10-23-42.
Evaluated by:
Tarr A. M,lnig~
f
Date:,
8/24/12, acLaybyTecn 8/2412 Page 339 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 340 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 341 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Sheets ofj4 Status: YE] NE] UZ Equipment ID NoE Q2R166007 Equip. Class, 2 Ecutdpmn Descnption 600V LOAD CENTER 2E 6laton: B*dg, AUXILIARY FoorEl, E
121 Room, Area 2229 Manufacture, Model Etc. (optional but r<conrnhended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of theSeismic Walkdown of an item of equipmtent on the SWEL The space beloweach of thefollowing questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings, Additional space s provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anehorage I. Is the anchorage ctnfiguration verification required (i.e., is the item one. Yn NE0 of the 50% of SWEL itemsrequiring such verification)?
Anchorage is inside panel and'cannot be verified
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose haidware?
.3. Is the anchorage free of cot.irosion that is more than nmild surface oxidation?
YEI NEI UZ1 N/AEI YE3 N3 U0, N/AE:
- 4. k.the anchorage-free of visible cracks in the concrete near the atichors?
YEG NO U9 N/AE]
- 5. IS the anchorage crnfiguration consistent with plant docunientation?
(Note: This question only applies if the iietm is one of the 50% for which an aniThorage configuration veiftcation is required,)
- 6. Based on'the above anchorage evaluations, is the.atiohdrage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions' YO NO LJZ NIAL-Y0 NOl us t.Iicrthe itt uipilncnI chiss nanic -fron Appciidix 8: Classes oftquipipment..
Page 342 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Sheet 2 of ý 4 Status: YLJ NEI UN Equipment ID No. Q2R16B007 Equip, Class' 2 Equipment Description 600V LOAD CENTER 2E Interaction Effects.
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by ner'by equipment or structures?
YZ ND UD N/AD
- 8. Are overhead equipment,.distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and 'masonry block walls not likely to collapse"onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines haveadequate flexibility t0oavoid damage?
- 10. Based on.the above seismic~interaction evaluationss.is equipment free of potentially adverse, seismic interaction effects?
Y& ND: QE N/AD\\
Y9 NDI U INAD Y9 NDEI U Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seisinic conditionsthat could.
adversely affect the: safety functions of the equipment?
YZ NrD UD Cqonments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Evalluaed by: l~Aý A. NU~W\\y/) ~
.J~-
/
6./
Date:
82
ý-
Page 343 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 344 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Cincm Page 345 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet id6f / 4 Status: YE[
NO UV Seismic Watkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment:ID No, 02R17B510.
Equip, Class'.. i Equipment Description MCC 2T Location:, Bldg. DIESEL FloorEl. 155 Room, Area,
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional-but recommended)
Instrudtiosnslor Cosiipleting<Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results-.of the.lSeismic Walkdown of an item-of equipment on the SWEL. The space below, each0f, thiefollowing qae.ti ons mayI be tused' to record thti results 0fjudginents~and findirngs. Additional, space is provided at:the end~oftlhis checklist for documenting otiher comments.
Anchora.e T.1 Is. the anchorage configuration verificaiiontrequiied'(i.e, is the item one YVINE]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
.Amhqm"e is iroli'ae-ai h
.c&r Crn~d Wac rlo+
VIsjtL16A d4 lirj I-N6 vActo' Q ui 2, Is the anchorage~free'ofbeni, broken, missing or loosephar~dware?
YEI NET UIJ N/AEI
- the anchorage free of corrosin that.is morethanrmild surface oxidation?
YED NEI UO.N/ýAE 4-Is the anclihrage free of visible cracksin the concrete near the antchobrs?
YE 'NEI U*[O N/AE, 5, it the anc*orageconfiguration consistent with plrvntdocumentationi?
(Note: This question oiily applies if thiditemn istone of the 50%. for, which an anchorage configuration verification isrequired.)
- 6. Based onhthe above anchorage evaluations, it.the anchoiagr free of potentially adve'rse seismic conditions?
-YEN U5'N/AE YE0 NE Uý$
Ente the eqaipinentclas name frwn Appendix 9: Classes of Equipment.
Page 346 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet:2 OfJ4 Status;ý Yn NovU~
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No; Q2R17B510 Equip.,Classl Y Equipment Descripftin MCC 2T Interaction Effects.
- 7. Are soft:targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8.. Are overhead equipment,.distribution systems, ceilihg.tiles andl Iighting, and masonry block walls notlikely to collapseonto the equipment?
,9. Do attached lines have adequate fleXibility-toavoid dainage?-
- 10. Based on the aboVe seismic interadfion-evalumtions, is;equipment frec of potentia!ly~aldverse seismic interaction effects?
SNn pEl N/AC YO ND UC N/AC Y4: NCI UC N/AC YN NC un Other Adverse Condictions, I:]. LHaVeyou looked formand founidrino othcr seis§ic cbndiiion*'thlAt:could
- adversely affect the~safety finctions of the equipment?
YNC3 UrC Comments (Additionalpages may be added asnhecessary)
Evaluated by: -A ab]
1"odA Mcio f
cxx.{
V,.
1 Date:
'*.Z@*.
Page 347 of 467
A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 348 of 467
A A'I-TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF1 64-RPT-02, VERSION 10 Page 349 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheeti Qf~a-
~'tatus~
Nij ULj
,Sehimic Walkdown Checkdist (SWC)
E'quipment R) No, Q2RIS030 Equip, Cts 2 Equipm en UDesriptnon PQWER DfSCO NEC T SWITCH Location Bid AUXILIARY FloorEI 139 RoomE Area.
MNfannt c ii rModel, Etc.
l, tional but re onene 8)
Iiistructons for Completing Checklist Tische kiJ tmay be used to document theresults of the Scosmie Walkdown: of an:item ofequient'on the SWEL, The snace below each of tbe uliowing qumestions may betuied toicord t e.resofjudi~nentsahd hiiidings, Addii oal space is provkied at theed of this checkidit for docimsendng Other cot ts.
- 1. Is thanchorage configuration verification (equired_(i, is. theitem one of the 50% of SWEL iiems requiring:such-v rification)?
Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missihgor Jtbse hardware?
3.Is he achorage free of corrosion thatuis sore than miJ urface ox daton?
YEN[J
'E~JO 1
N/AFJ 4, Is theanchorage free of visible cacksa n iUi concietnar the aunchors?
YE' ND 1U0 N!AV
- 5. Is the andhdrag configur tion consis tont with pilanut dotum ntation?
Y[/N[
tU N/A[]
(Note: This qo suon only ipphies the item io on f, *the5, 6fr which an.chorage configuration ofic tifiaon is r'equ red
- 6. Based oniob <above nehorae e itiattonS, is the ranecfree of Yo F1 "J 10 poten 1tianiN1 od Q)-rýs.seismic conditions?
ffixar the equipmentl class name from AIP ndix B' clamors of Equipuneit.
Page 350 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheetu2ofs4 Status: Y LT NED U0]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentID No. 02R!B030, Equip..Class' 2 EquipmentrDescription POWER, DISCONNECT'SWITCH Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets freefi0omimpact by nearby equipment or structurcs?
- 8: Are overhead equipment, distribution: systems,. ceiling tilesand lighting-;
and masoniy bl6ck.?walls not likely to collapse onto th'6 equipment?
- 9. Do ýattach.cd'jinbes have adequate Iflexibi ity to avoid damage?
- 10. Based on the above seism'Oinineractionaevaluations, isequipment free
'of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Y DNOl UU] NUAI YD:11 uO UN/AO Y~ WNU 0F Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Hiyave youlooked for and fouid.no otlher seismic conditions that-eould adversely affect the safety functionsi of the equipment?
Y/10U Comments (Adaitional pages mnay be added as necessa ry)
R4{/e~(5~4f Evaluated by:
ý, ýYijA It bate:;
2 -
Page 351 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 352 of 467
E ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS S
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 353 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Status: Yf N0 UEfJ Equipment ID No, Q2RI8B032 Equip. Class' 14 Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKERBOX
- Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc, (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown.of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may'be used to record the results of'judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other coumnents.
Anchorage tL Is the anchorage configuration verification reqtured (i e., is the item one Y NIT]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
- 3. Is.theaanch6rage free of corrosion that isomsre than mild surface oxidation?
YE3'NE] UP, N/AU YIYNEI U0 N/ACI 4ý, Is the anchotage~free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchofs?
Y*dNU] U0 N/AC
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plait docunmentation?
YL5/N-: UCU1 N/A.
(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one ofthe50% for which -n anchorage c6nfigurstion verification is'requiredd)
,@ o**/ /&,*t/ TeP,:
- 6. Based on the above iiai-t-eora -e-vatuo-ns, tame e
YId.NE) UC poce'nially adverse seismic conditions?
Enter the eqtihnern cluss iain fronAppeniix B: Cla~ses of Equipment.
Page 354 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet,2 0of1'4 go Status: Y9-0 N li uD 4 I'i Seismic Walkdow n Checklist (SWC)
E'aipment 11) No. Q2R18B032 Equip. C-lass'_14_
Equipent DeNcrpon 2R BREqAipR BOX_____
Fqtiipinient Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOX' Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soffttargets free from impact by nearbl'yequipment or.str-ctureW?.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, aand masonry block walls not lik&ly to collapse onto the equipment?
.9. Do attachedt lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
- 10. Base:ontthe above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipmentfrcc of potentialy adverse seismic interaction ffects?
Ybý NO. VO N/AOl Y:[NIO UEJ N/AfJ
-YE3'NO VO JNIAFT YfEJ NO UEJ OtherAdverse Conditions 1I..lavy you looked for and found nb other seismic conditidns that could Y[E'.No 1.1 adverseIv affect the safety functibns of theI equipment?
Comments (Additlonal pages:fniay. be added as necessary)
/
t e4iL
~
/A.)
Evaluated by, V, z;
- Datc:
- 2 Page 355 of 467
3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
0 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 356 of 467
AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0
NO, SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 357 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 She* lof 3 Status:
NEI NDuD Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. Q2R18B034 Equip. Class' 2 Equipment Description POWER DISCONNECT SWITCH Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item ne YA of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? "'405 3
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
YO NF] UF] N/A[E
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YJ' NE] UE] N/AEI oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
YJ No] U!- N/A["
- 5. Is'the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?,
NEI N]
M NU!]
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for '7V' which an anchorage configuration verification is re uired.)
Ob0 w
-Fa-two W'
md~m c~e VCY'on, WIr71
%24A)1VQ
'Saw ;V '0M&
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anc orage free of T& NE U
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
,(,a
'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 358 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 Of 3
.Status: d NE] LIU]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment [D No, Q2Ri8B034 Equip. CQass_ 2 Equipment Description POWER DISCONNECT SWITCH Interaction Effects 7, Are soft targets free from impa t boy nearby equipment or.stmctures?
.8. Are overhead equipment, ;distrihuonsystems, ceiling tiles,ind lighting, and masonry block walls not kely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do.attached !ineshave adeqmite bi~ify toavoid damage?
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evahiations; is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions 11.: Have you looked for n cdifound(;
o bher seismic conditions that.could adversely Iafict th' nsay fnIctions of the equipment?
Yl NE UEJ N/AEJ YNE] tEU NIA(]
Yý NED UI N/AEl YEJ NEI DE.
YiNEI LIE Commients (Additional pages may, be added ýis tteeessaryy`[I -ý00~OV\\
~(Sd~$~~
xJo 1 ý0"C Yr0-.S 4 1
~~~~~~~~~~5~~~~~~~ý x
j N~tc.
r ~~
A
,\\.
a~~- ~
Q(A
~t/\\
c N~&
adU-Sk$St d~V~~'e
~ce.
~
1J &Ks~o. s Evlatd by-
.ý Date:
J*'
.=:
I.
1 Page 359 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 r-1.
/
Page 360 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 3 Status: 4[* N J-U[I-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 02R18B043 Equip. Class, 2 Equipment Description MOV POWER DISCONNECT SWITCH Location; Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document. the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one -- d of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? ')t0j
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
YO/ Nn Un N/A-
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y&6 Nn U[] N/AU oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
YO NO U'n N/AD V,,
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
V N-UD NI (Note: This question only applies if the itern is one of the 50% for otIdv~hich anIanchorage configuration verification is required.) Obs.VQZ.f VV P "hA C
Cma'm* CA1?5
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of N-UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?
eSasNIU Einter the equipmerl class name frornAppendix B: Classes of Equipment.n --
\\.\\ _
Page 361
%tV
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS j
.q-5 NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 She 9t.2 of 3 Status: Ydi NE] U0-/
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. Q2R18B043 Equip. Class, Equipment Description MOV POWER DISCONNECT SIWITCH InteractionEffects
- 7. Ar& soft targets freefrom impact by nearby equipment or structures?
YR NC UC N/AO
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles. and lighting, NC UC N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse; onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?
- 10. Based on the above seismicinteraction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Y[6 NC UC N/AC YfiNC uIC Other Adverse Conditions U.. Have you.looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y4 NC U[JC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additio~nall pages muay be, added as neensaryy-hcs ViN z cq. 'pw*~i dYX\\J 1C) ri\\
Evaluated by.\\
t~c}
Date*
ýj
____toP Page 362 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 363 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet iof.ýKq J Statu:
EYgNL Ufl Seismic Walkdown CheckliSt (SWC)
EqnipmentlD No, QR2218001D Equip. C s'
4 Eqaipme n Description 120V PEG'PANEL 2F Location: Bldg, AUXILIARY Fldoc&El. I____ Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, tet, (opiional butareenmmended)
Instructions for Completing Checkiht 1khis:checklist maybe used to docment the results of the Seismic W aldown of an item of eqUipment onrthe SVEL, The sPace below ach of the folowing questions maY be Used to ccrd thor Isil-ofjudm it ad
)fin'ings. Additional spacoisprovided at the end of this ch'ecklist for documenting other coulaoents, Anchorage i, Is the,anchorage configuration verification required (i,e,, is the item one Y6 NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2, Is the anchorage free of bent, biroker,, missing or loose hardware?
3* Is te anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mildasurface oxidatior?
Yg( NE UD N/A YYND iE3 'N/AD
- 4. Is t19eanchbrage free of visible cracks in t0,- concrete rnar the anchors?
Y[V NE U0 N/AO 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?
(Note: This question only.Apipies if the iteta is one of the 50% fotr which aranchorage configurafion verifieation is requicd.)
6, Based on the aoe anc ihorage ealuations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverseet~dc ConditionS?
YeNO CEJ NIADL YE~'NO UE En ter the equipinenl ciass tame trimi Appendix Wl Ckmsc o, quiprtc'it.
Page 364 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdownlheck~ist (SWC)
Equipment DNo. Q2R21BOOID
,Equip. CiAO 14 Equipmett Descaiption 120VREG PANEL.2F Interattion :Effects
- 7. Are soft targets ee from inpact.by nearby equipmen t or structures?
- 8. Are overhead e4uipmitet, ditribution systems, eeiling tiles and lighting, atd'masonry block walls notlikely to'collapse onto the equipmerft?
- 9. Dmattahed ies have Adequate flexibilityto avoid damage?
16., Based on the above seis mic interaction evaluations, is e4uipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects'?
Sheet 2 ofZ2 q,'-
Status: YQ'ND EJ IF YU-ND Un N/AD Y0 NET~
UQ ýN/AQ YO NO UI N/IAE Y~jJ'N0 LYE Other Adverse Conditions 1t. Have you looked foranidjfoundito othr sesiisic conditions that could YO3 NEO UL adversely affect.the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additiostl pages may be added as necessary)
Evaluated by:
Date-,
I2~
Page 365 of 467
3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 01 Page 366 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 r,
Page 367 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of/<
I*
(w Status: Y9' NcaD do Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
-Equipment-il)jNo Q2R2IEOOGD Eqi*,pment Description INVERTER 2W Location: Bldg&. AUXILIARY FloorEl, 121 Room, Area.
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions'for:Completing Checklist This checklist maybe used to document the results of theSeismie Walkdown of an item of equipnent on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgmeitts and
,findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checlsisi for dbcumenting othercomments, Anchoraee I. is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e, is the item oine Y
NiDl of t*e 50% of SWEL items requiting such verification)?
- 2. Is.the anchorage free.df bent, brokenmmssing or loose hatdwaý7e
- 3. Is the anchoragejfree of corrosion that is morethan mild surface oxidation?
YI;NE] 'Ur N/AD Y[/ND] UI-N/AE]
4; Isttie, ahomrage free ofisible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
Y[* ND UD N/AD
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant docurnentation?
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluktions, iS.the anchorage free of
-potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Y NAD UD NAD YDnDUD "Etier the equipmtent etass laies from Appendix.B;.Classcs of Eqa~ipmesat.
Page 368 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Status;: Yjf NEI UmL ý1 1/
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment tD No, Q2R21E009D E/ip.. Class, Equipment Description INVERTER 2D Interaction Effects
- 7. Are §hft targets free from impact by nesrbye pipment or structures?
- 8. Ate overhead equipment, distribution systems, celing tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapseonto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached iiiies have adeuat fleixibility to avoid damage?
- 10. Based 6n the ab6v steismic interaction evaluations, is equipiment irde of potentially adverse seismic interactipn effects?
Y YiNC U!] N/AD Y~aý[ J U! N/A!]
YEAN!]1 U!] N/A!1]
/YN YE] N!]I U!
Other Adverse Conditions I i. Have you looked for and.found no other seismic conditions that could
,adversely affeci the safety funcijons of the~equipment?
2fNO U0]
Cornments: (Adtd*itionap ges mzay be ad d ed as~necessary).
li ine b:Pm!XW Datle:
Page 369 of 467
I 3 S ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION i.0 Page 370 of 467
0 0
NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 371 of 467
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Page 372 of 467