ML20197J306

Submits Complain That Addressed to NRC Commissioners Was Answered by Someone Else in Different Section

ML20197J306
Person / Time
Site:	Neely Research Reactor
Issue date:	10/01/1998
From:	Blockeyobrien AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20197J283	List: ML20197J280 ML20197J306
References
2.206, NUDOCS 9812150036
Download: ML20197J306 (2)

Text

e, ,

e y

Paulo Blakey-O Dnen D23 G4% nney 7631 Oglas Jg y heimaw. c4 mm us4 ,

To l

The Commissioners of the U.S. NRC, l Office of the Commissioners,

.. g 3 g g ,

U.S. NRC, Washington,D.C. 20555-0001 f GI a V: -

Oct. 1st, 1998 j 1

l Re: My letter of Aug. 27th,1998 to you. l I sent you, the Commissioners , the above referenced letter for action and response. I recieved an answer, amounting to a run- I a-round, from somebody else in a different section. I did not j write them the letter. The response is unacceptable. I would like  ;

a detailed reply from each NRC Commissioner. Had I wanted a reply from somebody else, I would have sent them the letter to begin j with. I want a reply that shows that you each actually read my  !

letter and that details what you intend to do about this grave j situation. I also want to know, if you all ever read my "2.206" Petitiot', additional correspondance, testimonies to the ASLB Judges, i and over 500 pages of back-up documents. And due to the fact that i

you can order the Cobalt out, I want to know why you haven't done  !

I so. If you have not read my "2.206" Petition, I want to know why ,

6 you did not as it is your responsibility also, in particular since f responses I got given indicated your agreement . I waNT TO KNOW

, WHAT YOUR BASIS IS FOR ALLOWING THE COBALT TO STILL BE STORED IN A POOL THAT FALLS UNDER NRC LICENSE, SINCE THE POOL IS PART OF

( O g THE REACTOR LICENSE, AND WHETHER OR NOT YOU INTEND TO TAKE FULL

a. RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR NEGLIGENCE IN NOT ORDERING IT REMOVED l

l

• FROM THE POOL YOU LICENSE AS THE NRC, WERE SOMETHING AWFUL TO O

HAPPEN, SUCH AS A CATASTROPHIC ACCIDENT OR TERRORIST ATTACK ?

04 Furthermore, I wish to know why the NRC - with STATE DEPARTMENT Y

N approval no less- is violating its own laws and has allowed ship-

• ment of thousands of kilos of HEAVY WATER to the United Arab Emir-h0 ates under circumstances I have detailed to NRC as being peculiar in the extreme (See ray letters to the NRC of April 7th,1998 and June 14th 1998 to Mr. Robert O'Connell, Office of Nuclear Material m

2 Safety and Safeguards) with an ultimate end use that is anyones guess I in actuality, and on top of that, as I told NRC, many others agree with me that heavy water is not used for the purpose stated, and I furthermore the State Department MUST know that in approving that amount - 25,000 kg of heavy water, at a rate of 7,500 kg a year, when the law states that over 1,000 kg. a year are NOT allowed to be exported, period -that it too is violating the laws of the United States . Apart from the fact that both the NRC and the StabeDepart-ment are not only asleep at the wheel, but unconcious at the wheel on this one, as I have stated before. That whole situation is contrary to the health and welfare of the public, it is not in the best interests of the United States, or the world, to be shipping large quantities of heavy water abroad, when everyone is well aware  ;

of what the consequences could be. In case the State Department and l the NRC is suddenly also suffering from amnesia, the consquences equal NUCLEAR WEAPONS -YOU KNOW, NUCLEAR BOMBS, NUCLEAR MISSILES.

By the way, just what is the jail term for violating the law ?

l i

j - 4 l

Pamela Blockey-O'Brien.