ML20202J652: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
}}
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 07100020/2011007]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:. _ _ _ _ .      ._
{{#Wiki_filter:.   _ _ _ _ .      ._
ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Entergy Operations, Inc.                                            Docket Nos.: 50-313;50-368 Arkansas Nuclear One                                                Licensa Nos.: OPR-51; NPF-6 EA 97-543 During an NRC laspection conducted October 20 through November 7.1997, one violation of NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," NUREG-1600, the violation is listed below:
  .
,              10 CFR 50.59 requires, in part, that licensees shall maintain records of changes in the facility and of changes in procedures to the extent that these changes constitute changes in the facility as described in the Final Safety Analysis Report, and that thece records must include a written safety evaluation that provides the basis for a determination that the change does not involve an unreviewed safety question.
  .
Contrary to the above, on October 21,1997, the plant safety committee approved a change to Units 1 and 2 Final Safety Analysis Reports, Section wD.1.3, and to Procedure 1000.120, "ANO Fire Watch Program," Revision 8, without a written safety evaluation, which provides the basis for a determination that the change did not involve an unreviewed safety question.
                                                      ENCLOSURE 1
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement IV) (Violation 50-313; -368/9718 01).
                                                  NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 Entergy Operations, Inc., is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
        Entergy Operations, Inc.                                            Docket Nos.: 50-313;50-368
Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Adtdriistrator, Region IV,611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011, and a copy to the NRC Resident inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a
        Arkansas Nuclear One                                                Licensa Nos.: OPR-51; NPF-6
         " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Your response may reference or include previous docketed correspondence, if the correspondence adequately addresses the required response. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or a Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
                                                                            EA 97-543
9712110208 971206 PDR    ADOCK 05000313 G                      PDR
-
        During an NRC laspection conducted October 20 through November 7.1997, one violation of
        NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and
        Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," NUREG-1600, the violation is listed below:
,              10 CFR 50.59 requires, in part, that licensees shall maintain records of changes in the
                facility and of changes in procedures to the extent that these changes constitute changes
                in the facility as described in the Final Safety Analysis Report, and that thece records
                must include a written safety evaluation that provides the basis for a determination that
                the change does not involve an unreviewed safety question.
                Contrary to the above, on October 21,1997, the plant safety committee approved a
                change to Units 1 and 2 Final Safety Analysis Reports, Section wD.1.3, and to
                Procedure 1000.120, "ANO Fire Watch Program," Revision 8, without a written safety
                evaluation, which provides the basis for a determination that the change did not involve
                an unreviewed safety question.
                This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement IV) (Violation 50-313; -368/9718 01).
        Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 Entergy Operations, Inc., is hereby required to
        submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:
        Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Adtdriistrator,
        Region IV,611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011, and a copy to the NRC
        Resident inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of
        the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a
         " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the
        violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have
        been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further
        violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Your response may reference
        or include previous docketed correspondence, if the correspondence adequately addresses the
        required response. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice,
        an order or a Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be
        modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be
        taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
    9712110208 971206
    PDR    ADOCK 05000313
    G                      PDR


2-Because your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the extent nossible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction. however, if you find it necessary to include such information, you should clearly indicate the specific information that you desire not to be l placed in the PDR, and provide the legal basis to support your request for withholding the information from the public.
        _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _
Dated at Arlington, Texas this 6th day of December 1997 1
  .                                                                                      .
                                                     .}}
  .
                                                      2-
    Because your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the extent
    nossible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so
    that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction. however, if you find it necessary to include
    such information, you should clearly indicate the specific information that you desire not to be l
    placed in the PDR, and provide the legal basis to support your request for withholding the
    information from the public.
    Dated at Arlington, Texas
    this 6th day of December 1997
1
!
!
                                                     .
}}

Latest revision as of 01:38, 8 September 2023

Notice of Violation from Insp on 971020-1107.Violation Noted:On 971021,plant Safety Committee Approved Change to Units 1 & 2 Fsars,Section 9D.1.3 & Approved Procedure 100.120, ANO Fire Watch Program, W/O Written SE
ML20202J652
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/06/1997
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20202J643 List:
References
50-313-97-18, 50-368-97-18, EA-97-549, NUDOCS 9712110208
Download: ML20202J652 (2)
v • d • e


See also: IR 07100020/2011007

Text

. _ _ _ _ . ._

.

.

ENCLOSURE 1

NOTICE OF VIOLATION

Entergy Operations, Inc. Docket Nos.: 50-313;50-368

Arkansas Nuclear One Licensa Nos.: OPR-51; NPF-6

EA 97-543

-

During an NRC laspection conducted October 20 through November 7.1997, one violation of

NRC requirements was identified. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and

Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," NUREG-1600, the violation is listed below:

, 10 CFR 50.59 requires, in part, that licensees shall maintain records of changes in the

facility and of changes in procedures to the extent that these changes constitute changes

in the facility as described in the Final Safety Analysis Report, and that thece records

must include a written safety evaluation that provides the basis for a determination that

the change does not involve an unreviewed safety question.

Contrary to the above, on October 21,1997, the plant safety committee approved a

change to Units 1 and 2 Final Safety Analysis Reports, Section wD.1.3, and to

Procedure 1000.120, "ANO Fire Watch Program," Revision 8, without a written safety

evaluation, which provides the basis for a determination that the change did not involve

an unreviewed safety question.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement IV) (Violation 50-313; -368/9718 01).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 Entergy Operations, Inc., is hereby required to

submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:

Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C. 20555 with a copy to the Regional Adtdriistrator,

Region IV,611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400, Arlington, Texas 76011, and a copy to the NRC

Resident inspector at the facility that is the subject of this Notice, within 30 days of the date of

the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply should be clearly marked as a

" Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) the reason for the

violation, or, if contested, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have

been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further

violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Your response may reference

or include previous docketed correspondence, if the correspondence adequately addresses the

required response. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice,

an order or a Demand for Information may be issued as to why the license should not be

modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other action as may be proper should not be

taken. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

9712110208 971206

PDR ADOCK 05000313

G PDR

_ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _

. .

.

2-

Because your response will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room (PDR), to the extent

nossible, it should not include any personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so

that it can be placed in the PDR without redaction. however, if you find it necessary to include

such information, you should clearly indicate the specific information that you desire not to be l

placed in the PDR, and provide the legal basis to support your request for withholding the

information from the public.

Dated at Arlington, Texas

this 6th day of December 1997

1

!

!

.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20202J652&oldid=3612038"