ML20072T628: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20072T628
| number = ML20072T628
| issue date = 05/21/1962
| issue date = 05/21/1962
| title = Responds to 620514 Ltr Re Concerns of Misunderstanding on Saxton Story.Original Source Confirmed Delay Caused by Insp
| title = Responds to Re Concerns of Misunderstanding on Saxton Story.Original Source Confirmed Delay Caused by Insp
| author name = Luntz J
| author name = Luntz J
| author affiliation = NUCLEONICS WEEKS, MCGRAW-HILL, INC. PUBLICATION
| author affiliation = NUCLEONICS WEEKS, MCGRAW-HILL, INC. PUBLICATION
Line 12: Line 12:
| case reference number = FOIA-91-17
| case reference number = FOIA-91-17
| document report number = NUDOCS 9104180198
| document report number = NUDOCS 9104180198
| title reference date = 05-14-1962
| package number = ML20072T453
| package number = ML20072T453
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE

Latest revision as of 18:23, 27 September 2022

Responds to Re Concerns of Misunderstanding on Saxton Story.Original Source Confirmed Delay Caused by Insp
ML20072T628
Person / Time
Site: Saxton File:GPU Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 05/21/1962
From: Luntz J
NUCLEONICS WEEKS, MCGRAW-HILL, INC. PUBLICATION
To: Lowenstein R
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20072T453 List:
References
FOIA-91-17 NUDOCS 9104180198
Download: ML20072T628 (1)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

( ,

diUC LE ONIC S ~ ~ 1. ~ > .... ~ J ... ~ -- . <o ... ......

u....w. m .ve vio~.

NUCLEONICS WEEK '

D & n Eh M ..s 5 'o W E "

M'%

May 21, 1962

Dear Bob:

I have looked into the question you raised in your letter of May lls on our story en Saxton, We checked back with our oriSinal source and found that there was one misunderstanding, a small one, in that the words "AEC inspection" should have road "AEC-requested i nspec tion".

However, the Saxton offical stated that his original statement did say delay was caused by the inspection.

I don't know whether you want to pursue this any further. If you i do please let me know.

Sincerely yours, Jer o .D. Luitt, Edith and Publisher JDLipq k

Mr. Robert Lowenstein, Director Division of Licensing & Regulation U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington 25, D. c. ,

/ 's it }&y p

,r W ht.:-;.V e,4,s4: c?

t 2 ,. . .

' hsi i19'w 5933 91ouso19e 91oa22 'o g/

L J?!t7 eDn 9ie aoM

..... _ . . . . . .. . _ . . - - - - . - . . . . . . . . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ - - -