ML20101C562

Provides Addl Info in Support of 951121 LAR

ML20101C562
Person / Time
Site:	Saxton File:GPU Nuclear icon.png
Issue date:	03/13/1996
From:	Kuehn G SAXTON NUCLEAR EXPERIMENTAL CORP.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
C301-96-2017, NUDOCS 9603190027
Download: ML20101C562 (2)

Text

.

• l

- SAXTON NUCLEAR EXPERIMENTAL CORPORATION GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES SYSTEM i Jmey Centre! Power & Light MAluNG ADDRESS:

General Public Utilities Nuclear Corporation One Upper Pond Reed

=

• • Metropoliten Edison Company Persippany, NJ 07054 N

d Pennsylvania Electric Company

, March 13,1996 C301-96-2017 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen,

Subject:

Saxton Nuclear Experimental Corporation l Operating License No. DPR-4 Docket No. 50-146 Additional Information in Support of License Amendment Request Based on a conversation with the Project Manager for the Saxton Nuclear i Experimental Corporation (SNEC) facility, Mr. A. Adams Jr., a number of items were identified in the text of Attachments F and G to our License Amendment Request of November 21, 1995 that require additional explanation. -

In Attachment F, sections of the proposed Amended Facility License the following changes were made:

- The title of the license was revised to identify GPU Nuclear as a co-licensee.

- GPU Nuclear was added or substituted for SNEC when the section involves management-related responsibilities that would be transferred to GPU Nuclear upon approval of the License Amendment Request. The sections involved are 1.C, 2.B and 2.C.1 through .3. This was done to clarify the responsibilities of GPU Nuclear and SNEC as they pertain to the License.

- The parenthetical phrases contained in Section 2.A of the existing License refer to the terms " reactor" and "Saxton". These have been changed to "Saxton facility " and "SNEC" respectively. These changes are considered to be editorial only.

For items identified in Appendix A: Technical Specifications, as addressed by Attachment G, the following explanations are provided:

Section A.1 was revised to read "The Saxton facility is on a 1.148 acre tract..." from "The Saxton site is a 1.148 acre tract...". The purpose of this revised wording is to consistently address the facility in the same manner and eliminate the previously interchangeable terms "SNEC site", "Saxton site", "SNEC facility" and "Saxton facility". The change is considered to be editorial only. Where any inconsistency may remain, it should be considered that the terminology is synonymous.

960319o027 960335 PDR ADOCK 05000146 W f)h P pop , j ;p

C301-96-2017 Page 2 of 2 l

Section A.2.d should read as in the Attachment F, Technical I Specification, section text with " Pennsylvania Electric Company" l spelled out in lieu of the wording provided in the revision explanation  !

which continued to refer to "Penelec". 1 Section A.3 which read "... possession of the Saxton Reactor Facility..."  ;

was revised to read "... possession of the Saxton facility...". This i situation is similar to that described for Section A.1 and should be considered synonymous.

Revision to Section B.1.a.4 was not addressed by Attachment G. The l proposed change would add the phrase, "and will consult with the SNEC 1 Facility Site Supervisor for production activity direction." The purpose of this proposed change is to assure that the GRCS consults with the SNEC Facility Site Supervisor to stay abreast of production activities.

This " consulting" is not intended to restrict the GRCS in any way in his dealing with radiological safety matters.

Section B.I.d.2 was not specifically addressed in Attachment G. For consistency, "SNEC site" was replaced with "Saxton facility's site".

These terms are synonymous and this proposed change is considered to be editorial only.

' Sincerely, A q R.Cu A y G.A.1%

G. A. Kuehn Jr. 4 Vice President SNEC WGH Attachment cc: Administrator, NRC Region I NRC Project Manager NRR NRC Project Scientist, Region I