ML17341A875: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 8
| page count = 8
}}
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 05000250/1981028]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:P.O.BOX 529100 MIAMI, F L 33152 USNFlc REG'ION:I ATLANTA, GEORGIA 8p JAN l8 P l;57 FLORIDA POWER Ss LIGHT COMPANY January 15, 1982 L-82-15 Mr.James P.O'ei 1 ly Regional Administrator, Region II U.S.Nuclear Regulatory
{{#Wiki_filter:P.O.BOX 529100 MIAMI, F L 33152 USNFlc REG'ION:I ATLANTA, GEORGIA 8p JAN l8 P l;57 FLORIDA POWER Ss LIGHT COMPANY January 15, 1982 L-82-15 Mr.James P.O'ei 1 ly Regional Administrator, Region II U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303  
Commission
 
101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Dear Mr.O'Reilly: Re: Turkey Points Units 3 5 4 Docket Nos.50-250, 50-251 IE In~sectio~nRe
==Dear Mr.O'Reilly:==
ort 81-28 Florida Power 8 Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection
Re: Turkey Points Units 3 5 4 Docket Nos.50-250, 50-251 IE In~sectio~nRe ort 81-28 Florida Power 8 Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection report and a response is attached.There is no proprietary information in the report.Very truly yours, ,z Y~rt E.Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems 8 Technology REU/PLP/ras cc: Harold F.Reis, Esquire 8~02i6O67S ea020S PDR ADOCK 05000250', 8 PDR PEOPLE...SERVING PEOPLE  
report and a response is attached.There is no proprietary
~~~~I.pl h 4 1~~ATTACHMENT RE: TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 5 4 DOCKET NOS.50-250, 50-251 IE INSPECTION REPORT 81-28 FINDING: Technical Specification 6.8.1 requires the licensee to establi'sh and implement procedures that meet the requirements and recommendations of ANSI N18.7-1972 and Appendix"A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33.Contrary to the above, while the reactor head was removed for refueling, the licensee did not implement two procedures in accordance with the requirements of ANSI N18.7-1972.1.Operating Procedure 16200 requires items that could fa'jl into the reactor to be kept off the manipulator crane and clear of the reactor cavity.On November 17, 1981, miscellaneous, untethered tools and materials were observed on the manipulator crane.2.equality Procedure 2.10 requires material accountability to be applied when misplaced items could be detrimental to the safety function of a system.On November 17, 1981, a system of material accountability had not been established for items entering the refueling area.RESPONSE: 1.FPL concurs with the finding.2.FPL did not previously, interpret equality Procedure 2.10 to require material accountability to be necessary in the refueling area.3.The immediate problem was resolved when refueling was completed.
information
4.In order to pr event recurrence, FPL wi 1 1 impl ement a materi al.accountability program as required by guality Procedure 2.10.5.Full compliance will be achieved prior to the post steam generator repair fuel loading on Unit 3.(Which is now scheduled for February 20, 1982).FINDING: Paragraph 14.2.1 of the Final Safety Analysis Report states that assumptions used for a fuel handling accident in the spent fuel pit are conservative because the auxiliary building doors are closed during movement of spent fuel.Contrary to the above, during fuel handling operations on November 17, 1981, doors which lead from the spent fuel pit directly to the outside atmosphere were propped open.  
in the report.Very truly yours, ,z Y~rt E.Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems 8 Technology
'4l I.E.INSPECTION REPORT 81-28 (Continued)
REU/PLP/ras
~~Page 2 RESPONSE: FPL will perform a safety evaluation of the spent fuel pit doors being open during movement of spent fuel.If the safety evaluation demonstrates that keeping the doors open during spent fuel movement does not involve any unrevi ewed safety questions, FPL will cunti nue our current practice.If not, we wi 11 modify our current practice to remedy the unreviewed safety question.The doors will be closed while moving spent fuel into or out of containment pending completion of the safety evaluation.
cc: Harold F.Reis, Esquire 8~02i6O67S
c 4 STATE OF FLORIDA))COUNTY OF DADE)Jack E.Vessely being first, duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is Director of Nuclear Affairs Light Company, the heres.n;of Florida Power&That he has executed the foregoing document;that the state-ments made in this said document are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief, and that he is authorized to execute the document on behalf of said J ck E.Vessely I/S g~Subscribed and sworn to before me this.<'-'/5 day of 4 n 4 I 4 19~/.,: NO.rgARY,, P,UBLI C r ,State ol Florida and for the County of Dade, My commission expires: Notary Public, State of Florida at Large My Commhsion Expfrea October 30,-1983 Bonded thru Ma nard Bondin A enc 0 r h~E l}}
ea020S PDR ADOCK 05000250', 8 PDR PEOPLE...SERVING PEOPLE  
~~~~I.pl h 4  
1~~ATTACHMENT
RE: TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 5 4 DOCKET NOS.50-250, 50-251 IE INSPECTION
REPORT 81-28 FINDING: Technical Specification
6.8.1 requires the licensee to establi'sh
and implement procedures
that meet the requirements
and recommendations
of ANSI N18.7-1972 and Appendix"A" of Regulatory
Guide 1.33.Contrary to the above, while the reactor head was removed for refueling, the licensee did not implement two procedures
in accordance
with the requirements
of ANSI N18.7-1972.1.Operating Procedure 16200 requires items that could fa'jl into the reactor to be kept off the manipulator
crane and clear of the reactor cavity.On November 17, 1981, miscellaneous, untethered
tools and materials were observed on the manipulator
crane.2.equality Procedure 2.10 requires material accountability
to be applied when misplaced items could be detrimental
to the safety function of a system.On November 17, 1981, a system of material accountability
had not been established
for items entering the refueling area.RESPONSE: 1.FPL concurs with the finding.2.FPL did not previously, interpret equality Procedure 2.10 to require material accountability
to be necessary in the refueling area.3.The immediate problem was resolved when refueling was completed.
4.In order to pr event recurrence, FPL wi 1 1 impl ement a materi al.accountability
program as required by guality Procedure 2.10.5.Full compliance
will be achieved prior to the post steam generator repair fuel loading on Unit 3.(Which is now scheduled for February 20, 1982).FINDING: Paragraph 14.2.1 of the Final Safety Analysis Report states that assumptions
used for a fuel handling accident in the spent fuel pit are conservative
because the auxiliary building doors are closed during movement of spent fuel.Contrary to the above, during fuel handling operations
on November 17, 1981, doors which lead from the spent fuel pit directly to the outside atmosphere
were propped open.  
'4l  
I.E.INSPECTION
REPORT 81-28 (Continued)
~~Page 2 RESPONSE: FPL will perform a safety evaluation
of the spent fuel pit doors being open during movement of spent fuel.If the safety evaluation
demonstrates
that keeping the doors open during spent fuel movement does not involve any unrevi ewed safety questions, FPL will cunti nue our current practice.If not, we wi 11 modify our current practice to remedy the unreviewed
safety question.The doors will be closed while moving spent fuel into or out of containment
pending completion
of the safety evaluation.  
c 4  
STATE OF FLORIDA))COUNTY OF DADE)Jack E.Vessely being first, duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is Director of Nuclear Affairs Light Company, the heres.n;of Florida Power&That he has executed the foregoing document;that the state-ments made in this said document are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief, and that he is authorized
to execute the document on behalf of said J ck E.Vessely I/S g~Subscribed
and sworn to before me this.<'-'/5 day of 4 n 4 I 4 19~/.,: NO.rgARY,, P,UBLI C r ,State ol Florida and for the County of Dade, My commission
expires: Notary Public, State of Florida at Large My Commhsion Expfrea October 30,-1983 Bonded thru Ma nard Bondin A enc  
0 r h~E l
}}

Revision as of 07:54, 17 August 2019

Responds to NRC 811204 Ltr Re Violation & Deviation Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-250/81-28 & 50-251/81-28.Corrective Actions:Matl Accountability Program Will Be Implemented & Safety Evaluation of Spent Fuel Pit Doors Will Be Performed
ML17341A875
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/15/1982
From: Robert E. Uhrig
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML17341A874 List:
References
L-82-15, NUDOCS 8202160671
Download: ML17341A875 (8)


Text

P.O.BOX 529100 MIAMI, F L 33152 USNFlc REG'ION:I ATLANTA, GEORGIA 8p JAN l8 P l;57 FLORIDA POWER Ss LIGHT COMPANY January 15, 1982 L-82-15 Mr.James P.O'ei 1 ly Regional Administrator, Region II U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Dear Mr.O'Reilly:

Re: Turkey Points Units 3 5 4 Docket Nos.50-250, 50-251 IE In~sectio~nRe ort 81-28 Florida Power 8 Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection report and a response is attached.There is no proprietary information in the report.Very truly yours, ,z Y~rt E.Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems 8 Technology REU/PLP/ras cc: Harold F.Reis, Esquire 8~02i6O67S ea020S PDR ADOCK 05000250', 8 PDR PEOPLE...SERVING PEOPLE

~~~~I.pl h 4 1~~ATTACHMENT RE: TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 5 4 DOCKET NOS.50-250, 50-251 IE INSPECTION REPORT 81-28 FINDING: Technical Specification 6.8.1 requires the licensee to establi'sh and implement procedures that meet the requirements and recommendations of ANSI N18.7-1972 and Appendix"A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33.Contrary to the above, while the reactor head was removed for refueling, the licensee did not implement two procedures in accordance with the requirements of ANSI N18.7-1972.1.Operating Procedure 16200 requires items that could fa'jl into the reactor to be kept off the manipulator crane and clear of the reactor cavity.On November 17, 1981, miscellaneous, untethered tools and materials were observed on the manipulator crane.2.equality Procedure 2.10 requires material accountability to be applied when misplaced items could be detrimental to the safety function of a system.On November 17, 1981, a system of material accountability had not been established for items entering the refueling area.RESPONSE: 1.FPL concurs with the finding.2.FPL did not previously, interpret equality Procedure 2.10 to require material accountability to be necessary in the refueling area.3.The immediate problem was resolved when refueling was completed.

4.In order to pr event recurrence, FPL wi 1 1 impl ement a materi al.accountability program as required by guality Procedure 2.10.5.Full compliance will be achieved prior to the post steam generator repair fuel loading on Unit 3.(Which is now scheduled for February 20, 1982).FINDING: Paragraph 14.2.1 of the Final Safety Analysis Report states that assumptions used for a fuel handling accident in the spent fuel pit are conservative because the auxiliary building doors are closed during movement of spent fuel.Contrary to the above, during fuel handling operations on November 17, 1981, doors which lead from the spent fuel pit directly to the outside atmosphere were propped open.

'4l I.E.INSPECTION REPORT 81-28 (Continued)

~~Page 2 RESPONSE: FPL will perform a safety evaluation of the spent fuel pit doors being open during movement of spent fuel.If the safety evaluation demonstrates that keeping the doors open during spent fuel movement does not involve any unrevi ewed safety questions, FPL will cunti nue our current practice.If not, we wi 11 modify our current practice to remedy the unreviewed safety question.The doors will be closed while moving spent fuel into or out of containment pending completion of the safety evaluation.

c 4 STATE OF FLORIDA))COUNTY OF DADE)Jack E.Vessely being first, duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is Director of Nuclear Affairs Light Company, the heres.n;of Florida Power&That he has executed the foregoing document;that the state-ments made in this said document are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief, and that he is authorized to execute the document on behalf of said J ck E.Vessely I/S g~Subscribed and sworn to before me this.<'-'/5 day of 4 n 4 I 4 19~/.,: NO.rgARY,, P,UBLI C r ,State ol Florida and for the County of Dade, My commission expires: Notary Public, State of Florida at Large My Commhsion Expfrea October 30,-1983 Bonded thru Ma nard Bondin A enc 0 r h~E l