ML13196A220: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:June 6, 2012MEMORANDUM TO: Jeremy J. Susco, Acting ChiefEnvironmental Review andGuidance Update BranchDivision of License RenewalOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Briana A. Balsam, Biologist IRA]Environmental Review andGuidance Update BranchDivision of License RenewalOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Dennis T. Logan, Aquatic Biologist IRA!Environmental Review andGuidance Update BranchDivision of License Renewal*Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
{{#Wiki_filter:June 6, 2012 MEMORANDUM TO: Jeremy J. Susco, Acting Chief Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Briana A. Balsam, Biologist IRA]Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Dennis T. Logan, Aquatic Biologist IRA!Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal*Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


SUMMARY OF SECTION 7 CONSULTATION ACTIVITIES RELATEDTO THE NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE'S FINAL RULETO LIST THE ATLANTIC STURGEONOn February 6, 2012, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) listed five distinctpopulation segments (DPSs) of the Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) underthe Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA).1 As a result of the Atlantic sturgeon's
==SUMMARY==
: listing, the Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch (RERB) staff reviewed thepotential for each U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)-licensed operating reactor toadversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon in order to identify plants for which the NRC must initiatesection 7 consultation pursuant to the ESA.RERB staff identified 10 operating reactors within the Atlantic sturgeon's range. Of these, theRERB staff identified six operating reactors that have the potential to adversely affect theAtlantic sturgeon or for which the staff was unsure of the potential effects to Atlantic sturgeonupon preliminary review. This memo summarizes the NRC's actions to date pursuant to theESA for each of the 10 operating reactors.
OF SECTION 7 CONSULTATION ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE'S FINAL RULE TO LIST THE ATLANTIC STURGEON On February 6, 2012, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) listed five distinct population segments (DPSs) of the Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA).1 As a result of the Atlantic sturgeon's listing, the Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch (RERB) staff reviewed the potential for each U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)-licensed operating reactor to adversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon in order to identify plants for which the NRC must initiate section 7 consultation pursuant to the ESA.RERB staff identified 10 operating reactors within the Atlantic sturgeon's range. Of these, the RERB staff identified six operating reactors that have the potential to adversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon or for which the staff was unsure of the potential effects to Atlantic sturgeon upon preliminary review. This memo summarizes the NRC's actions to date pursuant to the ESA for each of the 10 operating reactors.Brunswick Steam Electric Plant (Southport, NC)Atlantic sturgeon juveniles and migrating adults are likely to occur in the Cape Fear River in the vicinity of the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant (Brunswick) intake, and adults may occur in the Atlantic Ocean in the vicinity of the Brunswick discharge.
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant (Southport, NC)Atlantic sturgeon juveniles and migrating adults are likely to occur in the Cape Fear River in thevicinity of the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant (Brunswick) intake, and adults may occur in theAtlantic Ocean in the vicinity of the Brunswick discharge.
Thus, the NRC staff prepared a biological assessment 2 that considered the potential impacts of continued operation through the end of the facility's renewed license terms. In the biological assessment, the staff concluded that Brunswick is not likely to adversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon.
Thus, the NRC staff prepared abiological assessment 2 that considered the potential impacts of continued operation through theend of the facility's renewed license terms. In the biological assessment, the staff concluded that Brunswick is not likely to adversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon.
The NRC transmitted the 3lLA7
The NRC transmitted the3lLA7
, a J. Susco biological assessment to the NMFS and requested concurrence with the staff's effect determination by letter dated March 26, 2012.'On May 1, 2012, Ms. Nicole Bailey, NMFS, contacted Ms. Briana Balsam, NRC, to request additional information regarding Brunswick's cooling water system and associated thermal plume.4 The NRC responded to these requests by e-mail on May 15, 2012.5 At this time, NMFS and NRC are still in consultation regarding Atlantic sturgeon at Brunswick.
, aJ. Susco biological assessment to the NMFS and requested concurrence with the staff's effectdetermination by letter dated March 26, 2012.'On May 1, 2012, Ms. Nicole Bailey, NMFS, contacted Ms. Briana Balsam, NRC, to requestadditional information regarding Brunswick's cooling water system and associated thermalplume.4 The NRC responded to these requests by e-mail on May 15, 2012.5 At this time,NMFS and NRC are still in consultation regarding Atlantic sturgeon at Brunswick.
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant (Lusby, MD)Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant (Calvert Cliffs) is a two-unit once-through cooling system plant that withdraws and discharges water from the Chesapeake Bay. RERB staff reviewed information in the NRC's 1999 supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) for the Calvert Cliffs license renewal, 6 the NRC's 2011 environmental impact statement (EIS) for the combined license (COL) for Calvert Cliffs, Unit 3,7 and available scientific literature on the Chesapeake Bay population of Atlantic sturgeon.The NRC did not consider impacts to the Atlantic sturgeon in its 1999 SEIS. However, the NRC staff considered impacts to Atlantic sturgeon in its COL EIS, which indicated that no Atlantic sturgeon appeared in entrainment samples collected at the Calvert Cliffs intake in 2006 and 2007 or in samples collected during the same time period outside the baffle wall. Additionally, no Atlantic sturgeon occurred in impingement samples collected from 1975 through 1995.Based on the lack of evidence that Atlantic sturgeon occur in the vicinity of Calvert Cliffs, RERB staff concluded that the continued operation of Calvert Cliffs would have no effect on Atlantic sturgeon.
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant (Lusby, MD)Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant (Calvert Cliffs) is a two-unit once-through cooling systemplant that withdraws and discharges water from the Chesapeake Bay. RERB staff reviewedinformation in the NRC's 1999 supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) for theCalvert Cliffs license renewal,6 the NRC's 2011 environmental impact statement (EIS) for thecombined license (COL) for Calvert Cliffs, Unit 3,7 and available scientific literature on theChesapeake Bay population of Atlantic sturgeon.
Thus, the NRC did not initiate consultation with NMFS or take any further actions pursuant to the ESA for Calvert Cliffs.Indian Point Nuclear Generating (Buchanan, NY)Juvenile Atlantic sturgeon occur near Indian Point Nuclear Generating (Indian Point) because they migrate downstream to estuarine waters. Though sturgeon tend to stay in deeper channels, Entergy's records indicate that Indian Point has impinged some juvenile Atlantic sturgeon in the past. Migrating adults also occur near the plant, but should be able to avoid the low intake velocities of the Indian Point cooling water intake.The NRC requested reinitiation of formal consultation for the Atlantic sturgeon at Indian Point on May 16, 2012.8 A biological assessment 9 accompanied this request. Previous to this request, the NRC submitted to NMFS a biological assessment for shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) in December 200810 as part of a now-concluded formal section 7 consultation for the proposed license renewal of Indian Point. The NRC supplemented its December 2008 biological assessment in December 2010.11 The supplement included additional information on the shortnose sturgeon and some information on the Atlantic sturgeon (a candidate species at the time). The NRC supplemented its December 2008 biological assessment a second time in July 201112 due to the availability of a new triaxial survey of the Indian Point thermal effluent.The NRC's May 2012 biological assessment incorporated, by reference, the NRC's past biological assessments and included additional information on impingement and entrainment of Atlantic sturgeon.
The NRC did not consider impacts to the Atlantic sturgeon in its 1999 SEIS. However, the NRCstaff considered impacts to Atlantic sturgeon in its COL EIS, which indicated that no Atlanticsturgeon appeared in entrainment samples collected at the Calvert Cliffs intake in 2006 and2007 or in samples collected during the same time period outside the baffle wall. Additionally, no Atlantic sturgeon occurred in impingement samples collected from 1975 through 1995.Based on the lack of evidence that Atlantic sturgeon occur in the vicinity of Calvert Cliffs, RERBstaff concluded that the continued operation of Calvert Cliffs would have no effect on Atlanticsturgeon.
In the assessment, the NRC concluded that continued operation of Indian Point may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect, the Atlantic sturgeon.
Thus, the NRC did not initiate consultation with NMFS or take any further actionspursuant to the ESA for Calvert Cliffs.Indian Point Nuclear Generating (Buchanan, NY)Juvenile Atlantic sturgeon occur near Indian Point Nuclear Generating (Indian Point) becausethey migrate downstream to estuarine waters. Though sturgeon tend to stay in deeperchannels, Entergy's records indicate that Indian Point has impinged some juvenile Atlanticsturgeon in the past. Migrating adults also occur near the plant, but should be able to avoid thelow intake velocities of the Indian Point cooling water intake.The NRC requested reinitiation of formal consultation for the Atlantic sturgeon at Indian Point onMay 16, 2012.8 A biological assessment 9 accompanied this request.
Previous to this request,the NRC submitted to NMFS a biological assessment for shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) in December 200810 as part of a now-concluded formal section 7 consultation forthe proposed license renewal of Indian Point. The NRC supplemented its December 2008biological assessment in December 2010.11 The supplement included additional information onthe shortnose sturgeon and some information on the Atlantic sturgeon (a candidate species atthe time). The NRC supplemented its December 2008 biological assessment a second time inJuly 201112 due to the availability of a new triaxial survey of the Indian Point thermal effluent.
The NRC's May 2012 biological assessment incorporated, by reference, the NRC's pastbiological assessments and included additional information on impingement and entrainment ofAtlantic sturgeon.
In the assessment, the NRC concluded that continued operation of IndianPoint may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect, the Atlantic sturgeon.
To date, the NMFS J. Susco has not requested additional information from NRC regarding this consultation.
To date, the NMFS J. Susco has not requested additional information from NRC regarding this consultation.
NMFS and NRCremain in consultation regarding Atlantic sturgeon at Indian Point at this time.Millstone Power Station (Waterford, CT)Millstone Power Station (Millstone) is a two-unit once-through cooling system plant thatwithdraws and discharges water from Long Island Sound. The plant is located in Waterford, Connecticut, on Millstone Point, between the Niantic and Thames Rivers. Salinity levels withinthis area of the Sound range from 26 to 30 parts per thousand.
NMFS and NRC remain in consultation regarding Atlantic sturgeon at Indian Point at this time.Millstone Power Station (Waterford, CT)Millstone Power Station (Millstone) is a two-unit once-through cooling system plant that withdraws and discharges water from Long Island Sound. The plant is located in Waterford, Connecticut, on Millstone Point, between the Niantic and Thames Rivers. Salinity levels within this area of the Sound range from 26 to 30 parts per thousand.
Because of the high salinitylevels, only adult Atlantic sturgeon would occur in the vicinity of Millstone.
Because of the high salinity levels, only adult Atlantic sturgeon would occur in the vicinity of Millstone.
Adults should be ableto avoid the low intake velocities of the Millstone cooling water intake. Additionally, the NRC didnot identify any records indicating that Millstone has impinged Atlantic sturgeon in the past. TheNRC concluded that the continued operation of Millstone would have no effect on Atlanticsturgeon.
Adults should be able to avoid the low intake velocities of the Millstone cooling water intake. Additionally, the NRC did not identify any records indicating that Millstone has impinged Atlantic sturgeon in the past. The NRC concluded that the continued operation of Millstone would have no effect on Atlantic sturgeon.
Thus, the NRC did not initiate consultation with NMFS or take any further actionspursuant to the ESA for Millstone.
Thus, the NRC did not initiate consultation with NMFS or take any further actions pursuant to the ESA for Millstone.
Hope Creek and Salem Nuclear Generating Stations (Hancocks Bridge, NJ)At the time the NMFS published its final rule listing the Atlantic  
Hope Creek and Salem Nuclear Generating Stations (Hancocks Bridge, NJ)At the time the NMFS published its final rule listing the Atlantic sturgeon, the NRC and NMFS were already in formal consultation for Hope Creek and Salem Nuclear Generating Stations (Hope Creek and Salem). The NRC initiated formal section 7 consultation by letter dated December 13, 2010.13 The NRC enclosed in that letter the staffs biological assessment," 4 which considered the impacts of the proposed license renewal of Hope Creek and Salem operating licenses on shortnose sturgeon, Atlantic sturgeon, and four species of sea turtles.On April 14, 2011, PSEG Nuclear, LLC (PSEG) notified the NRC bye-mail that a dead Atlantic sturgeon had been found on the Salem intake structure trash bars on March 18, 2011.15 At that time, the Atlantic sturgeon was a proposed species, and the March 181h impingement was the only known impingement of the species at Salem since it had become a proposed species in October 2010. NRC requested a formal conference for the species by letter dated May 2, 2011 .1 PSEG has not reported any additional instances of Atlantic sturgeon impingements to the NRC to date.The NMFS issued a draft biological opinion for Salem on December 8, 2011 .The NRC and PSEG provided comments on the draft biological opinion on January 4, 2011 ,1 and January 11, 2011,19 respectively.
: sturgeon, the NRC and NMFSwere already in formal consultation for Hope Creek and Salem Nuclear Generating Stations(Hope Creek and Salem). The NRC initiated formal section 7 consultation by letter datedDecember 13, 2010.13 The NRC enclosed in that letter the staffs biological assessment,"
At the time the NMFS published its final rule listing the Atlantic sturgeon, NMFS and NRC were in the process of resolving comments on the draft biological opinion. The NRC requested that NMFS include the Atlantic sturgeon in the ongoing formal consultation by letter dated March 13, 2012.20 In an April 12, 2012, e-mail, 2 1 Julie Crocker, NMFS, stated that she was working to incorporate the Atlantic sturgeon in the draft biological opinion. Ms. Crocker indicated that she would provide the NRC with a revised draft by May 1, 2012. However, the NRC has not received a revised draft to date. At this time, NMFS and NRC are still in consultation regarding Hope Creek and Salem.Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Forked River, NJ)Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek) is a one-unit once-through cooling system plant that withdraws and discharges water from Bamegat Bay. Salinity levels in the vicinity of the plant reach as high as 32 parts per thousand.
4which considered the impacts of the proposed license renewal of Hope Creek and Salemoperating licenses on shortnose  
Similar to Millstone, the NRC J. Susco concluded that only adult Atlantic sturgeon have the potential to occur in the vicinity of Oyster Creek because of the high salinity levels. Adults should be able to avoid the low intake velocities of the Millstone cooling water intake. The NRC did not identify any records indicating that Oyster Creek has impinged Atlantic sturgeon in the past. The NRC concluded that the continued operation of Oyster Creek would have no effect on Atlantic sturgeon.
: sturgeon, Atlantic  
Thus, the NRC did not initiate consultation with NMFS or take any further actions pursuant to the ESA for Oyster Creek.Pil-grim Nuclear Power Station (Plymouth, MA)Subadults and adult Atlantic sturgeon are expected to occur in Cape Cod occasionally during migration, but the available literature does not indicate that they are common to the Plymouth area near the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim).
: sturgeon, and four species of sea turtles.On April 14, 2011, PSEG Nuclear, LLC (PSEG) notified the NRC bye-mail that a dead Atlanticsturgeon had been found on the Salem intake structure trash bars on March 18, 2011.15 At thattime, the Atlantic sturgeon was a proposed  
However, NRC staff prepared a biological assessment 2 2 in February 2012 to ensure that the staff considered all potential impacts to the species that would result from the proposed license renewal. The February 2012 biological assessment supplemented the staff's December 2006 biological assessment, which considered the potential effects of the proposed license renewal on four species of sea turtles, five species of whales, and the shortnose sturgeon.
: species, and the March 181h impingement was theonly known impingement of the species at Salem since it had become a proposed species inOctober 2010. NRC requested a formal conference for the species by letter datedMay 2, 2011 .1 PSEG has not reported any additional instances of Atlantic sturgeonimpingements to the NRC to date.The NMFS issued a draft biological opinion for Salem on December 8, 2011 .The NRC andPSEG provided comments on the draft biological opinion on January 4, 2011 ,1 andJanuary 11, 2011,19 respectively.
In its supplemental biological assessment, the staff concluded that the proposed license renewal would have no effect on the Atlantic sturgeon.
At the time the NMFS published its final rule listing the Atlanticsturgeon, NMFS and NRC were in the process of resolving comments on the draft biological opinion.
The NRC transmitted the supplemental biological assessment to the NMFS and requested concurrence with the staffs determination by letter dated February 29, 2012.23 On March 26, 2012, the NMFS sent a letter to the NRC summarizing a March 22, 2012, conference call between the NMFS and NRC.2 4 The letter indicated that NMFS is unable to concur with the NRC's "no effect" determination because listed species are present in the action area and may be exposed to the effects on Pilgrim operations.
The NRC requested that NMFS include the Atlantic sturgeon in the ongoing formalconsultation by letter dated March 13, 2012.20 In an April 12, 2012, e-mail,21 Julie Crocker,NMFS, stated that she was working to incorporate the Atlantic sturgeon in the draft biological opinion.
In a letter dated May 17, 2012,25 the NMFS concluded that the continued operation of Pilgrim may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon and 10 other listed species under NMFS jurisdiction.
Ms. Crocker indicated that she would provide the NRC with a revised draft byMay 1, 2012. However, the NRC has not received a revised draft to date. At this time, NMFSand NRC are still in consultation regarding Hope Creek and Salem.Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Forked River, NJ)Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek) is a one-unit once-through coolingsystem plant that withdraws and discharges water from Bamegat Bay. Salinity levels in thevicinity of the plant reach as high as 32 parts per thousand.
This letter concluded informal section 7 consultation for both license renewal and the Atlantic sturgeon listing.Seabrook Station (Seabrook, NH)Seabrook Station (Seabrook) is a one-unit once-through cooling system plant that withdraws and discharges water from the Atlantic Ocean. Because of the plant's location, only adult Atlantic sturgeon have the potential to occur in the vicinity of the plant. Adults should be able to avoid the low intake velocities of the Seabrook cooling water intake. Additionally, the NRC did not identify any records indicating that Seabrook has impinged Atlantic sturgeon in the past.The NRC concluded that the continued operation of Seabrook would have no effect on Atlantic sturgeon.
Similar to Millstone, the NRC J. Susco concluded that only adult Atlantic sturgeon have the potential to occur in the vicinity of OysterCreek because of the high salinity levels. Adults should be able to avoid the low intakevelocities of the Millstone cooling water intake. The NRC did not identify any records indicating that Oyster Creek has impinged Atlantic sturgeon in the past. The NRC concluded that thecontinued operation of Oyster Creek would have no effect on Atlantic sturgeon.
Thus, the NRC did not initiate consultation with NMFS or take any further actions pursuant to the ESA for Seabrook.Surry Power Station (Surry, VA)Atlantic sturgeon larvae and migrating adults are likely to occur in the James River in the vicinity of Surry Power Station (Surry). Thus, the NRC staff prepared a biological assessment 2 6 that considered the potential impacts of continued operation through the end of the facility's renewed license terms. In the biological assessment, the staff concluded that Surry is not likely to adversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon.
Thus, the NRCdid not initiate consultation with NMFS or take any further actions pursuant to the ESA forOyster Creek.Pil-grim Nuclear Power Station (Plymouth, MA)Subadults and adult Atlantic sturgeon are expected to occur in Cape Cod occasionally duringmigration, but the available literature does not indicate that they are common to the Plymoutharea near the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim).  
The NRC transmitted the biological assessment to the J. Susco-5-NMFS and requested concurrence with the staffs effect determination by letter dated March 20, 2012.27 On April 4, 2012, Ms. Julie Crocker, NMFS, contacted Ms. Briana Balsam, NRC, to request additional information regarding Surry's cooling water system and associated thermal plume.2 8 On May 7, 2012, Ms. Cathy Taylor, Dominion Resource Services, Inc. (Dominion) sent NRC answers to NMFS's questions." 9 The NRC forwarded Dominion's responses to NMFS on May 8, 2012.30 At this time, NMFS and NRC are still in consultation regarding Atlantic sturgeon at Surry.Summary and Conclusion Following the NMFS's listing of the Atlantic sturgeon under the ESA, RERB staff considered the potential for each NRC-licensed operating reactor to adversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon.
: However, NRC staff prepared abiological assessment 22 in February 2012 to ensure that the staff considered all potential impacts to the species that would result from the proposed license renewal.
The staff identified 10 plants within the range of the Atlantic sturgeon.
The February 2012biological assessment supplemented the staff's December 2006 biological assessment, whichconsidered the potential effects of the proposed license renewal on four species of sea turtles,five species of whales, and the shortnose sturgeon.
Of these, the staff concluded that four plants would have no effect on the Atlantic sturgeon (Calvert Cliffs, Millstone, Oyster Creek, and Seabrook).
In its supplemental biological assessment, the staff concluded that the proposed license renewal would have no effect on the Atlanticsturgeon.
The staff did not prepare a biological assessment or initiate section 7 consultation for these four plants.For the remaining plants, RERB staff prepared four biological assessments to determine the potential effects of plant operation on the Atlantic sturgeon.
The NRC transmitted the supplemental biological assessment to the NMFS andrequested concurrence with the staffs determination by letter dated February 29, 2012.23On March 26, 2012, the NMFS sent a letter to the NRC summarizing a March 22, 2012,conference call between the NMFS and NRC.24 The letter indicated that NMFS is unable toconcur with the NRC's "no effect" determination because listed species are present in the actionarea and may be exposed to the effects on Pilgrim operations.
The staff concluded that Pilgrim would have no effect on the species, while Brunswick, Indian Point, and Surry may affect, but are not likely to adversely affect the species, The staff forwarded copies of each of these biological assessments to the appropriate NMFS office with a request to initiate consultation.
In a letter dated May 17, 2012,25the NMFS concluded that the continued operation of Pilgrim may affect, but is not likely toadversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon and 10 other listed species under NMFS jurisdiction.
In the case of Salem and Hope Creek, the RERB staff had prepared a biological assessment in December 2010 that considered Atlantic sturgeon, which was a proposed species at the time.The staff concluded in that biological assessment that Hope Creek would have no effect and Salem may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the species. After the NMFS listed the Atlantic sturgeon, the staff sent a letter requesting that the NMFS consider the species in its biological opinion associated with the ongoing formal consultation for Salem and Hope Creek.In total between February and May 2012, the RERB staff initiated section 7 consultations for six plants as a result of the Atlantic sturgeon listing. To date, the NRC and NMFS have concluded one of these consultations (Pilgrim).
Thisletter concluded informal section 7 consultation for both license renewal and the Atlanticsturgeon listing.Seabrook Station (Seabrook, NH)Seabrook Station (Seabrook) is a one-unit once-through cooling system plant that withdraws and discharges water from the Atlantic Ocean. Because of the plant's location, only adultAtlantic sturgeon have the potential to occur in the vicinity of the plant. Adults should be able toavoid the low intake velocities of the Seabrook cooling water intake. Additionally, the NRC didnot identify any records indicating that Seabrook has impinged Atlantic sturgeon in the past.The NRC concluded that the continued operation of Seabrook would have no effect on Atlanticsturgeon.
The staff is working with both the NMFS Northeast and Southeast Regional Offices to ensure that each office has the information that it requires to complete its review of potential effects to the Atlantic sturgeon for each of the remaining consultations.
Thus, the NRC did not initiate consultation with NMFS or take any further actionspursuant to the ESA for Seabrook.
Docket Nos. 50-219, 50-247, 50-272, 50-280, 50-281, 50-286, 50-293, 50-311, 50-317, 50-318, 50-324, 50-336, 50-354, 50-423, and 50-443 J. Susco-5-NMFS and requested concurrence with the staff's effect determination by letter dated March 20, 2012.27 On April 4, 2012, Ms. Julie Crocker, NMFS, contacted Ms. Briana Balsam, NRC, to request additional information regarding Surry's cooling water system and associated thermal plume.2 8 On May 7, 2012, Ms. Cathy Taylor, Dominion Resource Services, Inc. (Dominion) sent NRC answers to NMFS's questions.
Surry Power Station (Surry, VA)Atlantic sturgeon larvae and migrating adults are likely to occur in the James River in the vicinityof Surry Power Station (Surry).
2 The NRC forwarded Dominion's responses to NMFS on May 8, 2012.30 At this time, NMFS and NRC are still in consultation regarding Atlantic sturgeon at Surry.Summary and Conclusion Following the NMFS's listing of the Atlantic sturgeon under the ESA, RERB staff considered the potential for each NRC-licensed operating reactor to adversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon.
Thus, the NRC staff prepared a biological assessment 26 thatconsidered the potential impacts of continued operation through the end of the facility's renewedlicense terms. In the biological assessment, the staff concluded that Surry is not likely toadversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon.
The staff identified 10 plants within the range of the Atlantic sturgeon.
The NRC transmitted the biological assessment to the J. Susco-5-NMFS and requested concurrence with the staffs effect determination by letter datedMarch 20, 2012.27On April 4, 2012, Ms. Julie Crocker, NMFS, contacted Ms. Briana Balsam, NRC, to requestadditional information regarding Surry's cooling water system and associated thermal plume.28On May 7, 2012, Ms. Cathy Taylor, Dominion Resource  
Of these, the staff concluded that four plants would have no effect on the Atlantic sturgeon (Calvert Cliffs, Millstone, Oyster Creek, and Seabrook).
: Services, Inc. (Dominion) sent NRCanswers to NMFS's questions."
The staff did not prepare a biological assessment or initiate section 7 consultation for these four plants.For the remaining plants, RERB staff prepared four biological assessments to determine the potential effects of plant operation on the Atlantic sturgeon.
9 The NRC forwarded Dominion's responses to NMFS onMay 8, 2012.30 At this time, NMFS and NRC are still in consultation regarding Atlantic sturgeonat Surry.Summary and Conclusion Following the NMFS's listing of the Atlantic sturgeon under the ESA, RERB staff considered thepotential for each NRC-licensed operating reactor to adversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon.
The staff concluded that Pilgrim would have no effect on the species, while Brunswick, Indian Point, and Surry may affect, but are not likely to adversely affect the species. The staff forwarded copies of each of these biological assessments to the appropriate NMFS office with a request to initiate consultation.
Thestaff identified 10 plants within the range of the Atlantic sturgeon.
In the case of Salem and Hope Creek, the RERB staff had prepared a biological assessment in December 2010 that considered Atlantic sturgeon, which was a proposed species at the time.The staff concluded in that biological assessment that Hope Creek would have no effect and Salem may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the species. After the NMFS listed the Atlantic sturgeon, the staff sent a letter requesting that the NMFS consider the species in its biological opinion associated with the ongoing formal consultation for Salem and Hope Creek.In total between February and May 2012, the RERB staff initiated section 7 consultations for six plants as a result of the Atlantic sturgeon listing. To date, the NRC and NMFS have concluded one of these consultations (Pilgrim).
Of these, the staff concluded that four plants would have no effect on the Atlantic sturgeon (Calvert Cliffs, Millstone, OysterCreek, and Seabrook).
The staff is working with both the NMFS Northeast and Southeast Regional Offices to ensure that each office has the information that it requires to complete its review of potential effects to the Atlantic sturgeon for each of the remaining consultations.
The staff did not prepare a biological assessment or initiate section 7consultation for these four plants.For the remaining plants, RERB staff prepared four biological assessments to determine thepotential effects of plant operation on the Atlantic sturgeon.
Docket Nos. 50-219, 50-247, 50-272, 50-280, 50-281, 50-286, 50-293, 50-311, 50-317, 50-318, 50-324, 50-336, 50-354, 50-423, and 50-443 DISTRIBUTION:
The staff concluded that Pilgrimwould have no effect on the species, while Brunswick, Indian Point, and Surry may affect, butare not likely to adversely affect the species, The staff forwarded copies of each of thesebiological assessments to the appropriate NMFS office with a request to initiate consultation.
See next page ADAMS Accession No: ML12152A298 OFFICE LA:RPB2:DLR PM:RERB:DLR AB:RERB:DLR NAME IKing BBalsam DLogan DATE 6/612012 6/612012 6/6/2012 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Memo to J. Susco from B. Balsam and D. Logan dated June 6, 2012  
In the case of Salem and Hope Creek, the RERB staff had prepared a biological assessment inDecember 2010 that considered Atlantic  
: sturgeon, which was a proposed species at the time.The staff concluded in that biological assessment that Hope Creek would have no effect andSalem may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the species.
After the NMFS listed theAtlantic
: sturgeon, the staff sent a letter requesting that the NMFS consider the species in itsbiological opinion associated with the ongoing formal consultation for Salem and Hope Creek.In total between February and May 2012, the RERB staff initiated section 7 consultations forsix plants as a result of the Atlantic sturgeon listing.
To date, the NRC and NMFS haveconcluded one of these consultations (Pilgrim).
The staff is working with both the NMFSNortheast and Southeast Regional Offices to ensure that each office has the information that itrequires to complete its review of potential effects to the Atlantic sturgeon for each of theremaining consultations.
Docket Nos. 50-219, 50-247, 50-272, 50-280, 50-281, 50-286, 50-293, 50-311, 50-317, 50-318,50-324, 50-336, 50-354, 50-423, and 50-443 J. Susco-5-NMFS and requested concurrence with the staff's effect determination by letter datedMarch 20, 2012.27On April 4, 2012, Ms. Julie Crocker, NMFS, contacted Ms. Briana Balsam, NRC, to requestadditional information regarding Surry's cooling water system and associated thermal plume.28On May 7, 2012, Ms. Cathy Taylor, Dominion Resource  
: Services, Inc. (Dominion) sent NRCanswers to NMFS's questions.
2 The NRC forwarded Dominion's responses to NMFS onMay 8, 2012.30 At this time, NMFS and NRC are still in consultation regarding Atlantic sturgeonat Surry.Summary and Conclusion Following the NMFS's listing of the Atlantic sturgeon under the ESA, RERB staff considered thepotential for each NRC-licensed operating reactor to adversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon.
Thestaff identified 10 plants within the range of the Atlantic sturgeon.
Of these, the staff concluded that four plants would have no effect on the Atlantic sturgeon (Calvert Cliffs, Millstone, OysterCreek, and Seabrook).
The staff did not prepare a biological assessment or initiate section 7consultation for these four plants.For the remaining plants, RERB staff prepared four biological assessments to determine thepotential effects of plant operation on the Atlantic sturgeon.
The staff concluded that Pilgrimwould have no effect on the species, while Brunswick, Indian Point, and Surry may affect, butare not likely to adversely affect the species.
The staff forwarded copies of each of thesebiological assessments to the appropriate NMFS office with a request to initiate consultation.
In the case of Salem and Hope Creek, the RERB staff had prepared a biological assessment inDecember 2010 that considered Atlantic  
: sturgeon, which was a proposed species at the time.The staff concluded in that biological assessment that Hope Creek would have no effect andSalem may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the species.
After the NMFS listed theAtlantic
: sturgeon, the staff sent a letter requesting that the NMFS consider the species in itsbiological opinion associated with the ongoing formal consultation for Salem and Hope Creek.In total between February and May 2012, the RERB staff initiated section 7 consultations forsix plants as a result of the Atlantic sturgeon listing.
To date, the NRC and NMFS haveconcluded one of these consultations (Pilgrim).
The staff is working with both the NMFSNortheast and Southeast Regional Offices to ensure that each office has the information that itrequires to complete its review of potential effects to the Atlantic sturgeon for each of theremaining consultations.
Docket Nos. 50-219, 50-247, 50-272, 50-280, 50-281, 50-286, 50-293, 50-311, 50-317, 50-318,50-324, 50-336, 50-354, 50-423, and 50-443DISTRIBUTION:
See next pageADAMS Accession No: ML12152A298 OFFICE LA:RPB2:DLR PM:RERB:DLR AB:RERB:DLR NAME IKing BBalsam DLoganDATE 6/612012 6/612012 6/6/2012OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Memo to J. Susco from B. Balsam and D. Logan dated June 6, 2012


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


SUMMARY OF SECTION 7 CONSULTATION ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THENMFS'S FINAL RULE TO LIST THE ATLANTIC STURGEONDISTRIBUTION:
==SUMMARY==
NON-PUBLIC RidsNrrDIr ResourceRidsNrrDIrRerb ResourceRidsNrrDIrRpbl ResourceRidsOgc ResourceBBalsamBHolianDLoganDWronaEWilliamson JLindellJSuscoLSubinMGalloway MMoserMSmithMSpencerSTurkSUttal
OF SECTION 7 CONSULTATION ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE NMFS'S FINAL RULE TO LIST THE ATLANTIC STURGEON DISTRIBUTION:
NON-PUBLIC RidsNrrDIr Resource RidsNrrDIrRerb Resource RidsNrrDIrRpbl Resource RidsOgc Resource BBalsam BHolian DLogan DWrona EWilliamson JLindell JSusco LSubin MGalloway MMoser MSmith MSpencer STurk SUttal


==References:==
==References:==


77 FR 5880. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.  
77 FR 5880. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Listing Determinations for Two Distinct Population Segments of Atlantic Sturgeon (Acipenser oxyninchus oxyrinchus) in the Northeast." Federal Register 77 (24):5880-5912.
"Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Listing Determinations for Two Distinct Population Segments ofAtlantic Sturgeon (Acipenser oxyninchus oxyrinchus) in the Northeast."
February 6, 2012.77 FR 5914. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Listing Determinations for Two Distinct Population Segments of Atlantic Sturgeon (Acipenser oxyninchus oxyrinchus) in the Southeast." Federal Register 77(24):5914-5982.
Federal Register77 (24):5880-5912.
February 6, 2012.77 FR 5914. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.  
"Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Listing Determinations for Two Distinct Population Segments ofAtlantic Sturgeon (Acipenser oxyninchus oxyrinchus) in the Southeast."
Federal Register77(24):5914-5982.
February 6, 2012.2 NRC's Biological Assessment Atlantic Sturgeon at Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Continued Operation.
February 6, 2012.2 NRC's Biological Assessment Atlantic Sturgeon at Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Continued Operation.
March 2012. ML 12065A380.
March 2012. ML 12065A380.
3 Letter from J. Susco, RERB Acting Chief, NRC, to R. Crabtree, Southeast RegionalAdministrator, NMFS, Request to reinitiate section 7 consultation for Atlantic sturgeon atBrunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2. March 26, 2012. ML12065A380.
3 Letter from J. Susco, RERB Acting Chief, NRC, to R. Crabtree, Southeast Regional Administrator, NMFS, Request to reinitiate section 7 consultation for Atlantic sturgeon at Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2. March 26, 2012. ML12065A380.
4Email from N. Bailey, ESA Consultant, NMFS, to B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, Requesting additional information about Brunswick thermal plume. May 1, 2012. ML12137A032.
4Email from N. Bailey, ESA Consultant, NMFS, to B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, Requesting additional information about Brunswick thermal plume. May 1, 2012. ML12137A032.
Email from B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, to N. Bailey, ESA Consultant, NMFS; Responses toMay 1, 2012, NMFS questions on Brunswick thermal plume. May 15, 2012. ML12137A034.
Email from B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, to N. Bailey, ESA Consultant, NMFS; Responses to May 1, 2012, NMFS questions on Brunswick thermal plume. May 15, 2012. ML12137A034.
6 NUREG-1437, Supplement 1, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewalof Nuclear Plants Regarding Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2.' October 1999.7 NUREG-1 936, "Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Combined License (COL) forCalvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 3."Letter from J. Susco, RERB Branch Chief, NRC, to P. Kurkul, Northeast RegionalAdministrator, NMFS, Request to reinitiate section 7 consultation for the Indian Point NuclearGenerating, Unit Nos. 2 and 3, due to listing of Atlantic sturgeon.
6 NUREG-1437, Supplement 1, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2.' October 1999.7 NUREG-1 936, "Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Combined License (COL) for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 3." Letter from J. Susco, RERB Branch Chief, NRC, to P. Kurkul, Northeast Regional Administrator, NMFS, Request to reinitiate section 7 consultation for the Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 2 and 3, due to listing of Atlantic sturgeon.
May 16, 2012.ML12100A082.
May 16, 2012.ML12100A082.
9 NRC's Biological Assessment for Reinitiation of Section 7 Consultation for Indian PointNuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Due to Listing of Atlantic Sturgeon.
9 NRC's Biological Assessment for Reinitiation of Section 7 Consultation for Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Due to Listing of Atlantic Sturgeon.
May 2012.ML1 21 00A082.10 NRC's Biological Assessment of the Potential Effects on Federally Listed Species from theProposed Renewal of Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 2 and 3. in Appendix E ofNUREG-1437, Supplement  
May 2012.ML1 21 00A082.10 NRC's Biological Assessment of the Potential Effects on Federally Listed Species from the Proposed Renewal of Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 2 and 3. in Appendix E of NUREG-1437, Supplement  
: 38. December 2008. ML083540614.
: 38. December 2008. ML083540614.
1' Letter from 0. Wrona, RPB2 Branch Chief, NRC, to M. Colligan, Assistant Northeast RegionalAdministrator for Protected Resources, NMFS, Revised biological assessment for licenserenewal of the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit Nos. 2 and 3. December 10, 2010.ML-102990043.
1' Letter from 0. Wrona, RPB2 Branch Chief, NRC, to M. Colligan, Assistant Northeast Regional Administrator for Protected Resources, NMFS, Revised biological assessment for license renewal of the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit Nos. 2 and 3. December 10, 2010.ML-102990043.
12 Letter from L. Bauer, RERB Branch Chief, NRC to M. Colligan, Assistant Northeast RegionalAdministrator for Protected Resources, NMFS, Supplement to revised biological assessment for license renewal of the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit Nos. 2 and 3. July 26,2011. ADAMS No. ML11203A1  
12 Letter from L. Bauer, RERB Branch Chief, NRC to M. Colligan, Assistant Northeast Regional Administrator for Protected Resources, NMFS, Supplement to revised biological assessment for license renewal of the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit Nos. 2 and 3. July 26, 2011. ADAMS No. ML11203A1  
: 00. 13 Letter from B. Pham, RPB1 Branch Chief, NRC, to M. Colligan, Assistant Northeast RegionalAdministrator for Protected Resources, Forwarding biological assessment for license renewalof Hope Creek Generating Station and Salem Nuclear Generating  
: 00. 13 Letter from B. Pham, RPB1 Branch Chief, NRC, to M. Colligan, Assistant Northeast Regional Administrator for Protected Resources, Forwarding biological assessment for license renewal of Hope Creek Generating Station and Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2.December 13, 2010. MLI 03350271.14 NRC's Biological Assessment for the Proposed License Renewal of Hope Creek Generating Station and Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2. December 2010.MLI103350271.
: Station, Units 1 and 2.December 13, 2010. MLI 03350271.
15 Email from R. Ranek, License Renewal Environmental Lead, Exelon Nuclear LLC, to L.Perkins, Environmental Project Manager, NRC, Regarding March 18, 2011, take of Atlantic sturgeon.
14 NRC's Biological Assessment for the Proposed License Renewal of Hope Creek Generating Station and Salem Nuclear Generating  
: Station, Units 1 and 2. December 2010.MLI103350271.
15 Email from R. Ranek, License Renewal Environmental Lead, Exelon Nuclear LLC, to L.Perkins, Environmental Project Manager, NRC, Regarding March 18, 2011, take of Atlanticsturgeon.
April 14, 2011. ML11105A126.
April 14, 2011. ML11105A126.
16 Letter from A. Imboden, RERB Branch Chief, NRC, to M. Colligan, Assistant Northeast Regional Administrator for Protected Resources, Requesting formal conference for theAtlantic sturgeon at the Salem Nuclear Generating  
16 Letter from A. Imboden, RERB Branch Chief, NRC, to M. Colligan, Assistant Northeast Regional Administrator for Protected Resources, Requesting formal conference for the Atlantic sturgeon at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2. May 2, 2011.ML111091091.
: Station, Units 1 and 2. May 2, 2011.ML111091091.
17 NMFS's Draft Biological Opinion for Salem and Hope Creek. December 8, 2011.ML11353A254.
17 NMFS's Draft Biological Opinion for Salem and Hope Creek. December 8, 2011.ML11353A254.
18 Email from B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, to J. Crocker, Fisheries Biologist, NMFS, Forwarding NRC's comments on draft biological opinion for Salem and Hope Creek. January 4, 2011.ML1 2011A049.
18 Email from B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, to J. Crocker, Fisheries Biologist, NMFS, Forwarding NRC's comments on draft biological opinion for Salem and Hope Creek. January 4, 2011.ML1 2011A049.19 Email from B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, to J. Crocker, Fisheries Biologist, NMFS, Forwarding PSEG's comments on draft biological opinion for Salem and Hope Creek. January 11, 2011.ML12018A446.
19 Email from B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, to J. Crocker, Fisheries Biologist, NMFS, Forwarding PSEG's comments on draft biological opinion for Salem and Hope Creek. January 11, 2011.ML12018A446.
20 Letter from A. Imboden, RERB Branch Chief, NRC, to M. Colligan, Assistant Northeast Regional Administrator for Protected Resources, NMFS, Requesting to include Atlantic sturgeon in ongoing formal section 7 consultation for Salem. Marc h 13, 2012. ML12060A121 21 Email from J. Crocker, Fisheries Biologist, NMFS, to B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, Regarding NRC's request to include Atlantic sturgeon in the Salem section 7 consultation.
20 Letter from A. Imboden, RERB Branch Chief, NRC, to M. Colligan, Assistant Northeast Regional Administrator for Protected Resources, NMFS, Requesting to include Atlanticsturgeon in ongoing formal section 7 consultation for Salem. Marc h 13, 2012. ML12060A121 21 Email from J. Crocker, Fisheries Biologist, NMFS, to B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, Regarding NRC's request to include Atlantic sturgeon in the Salem section 7 consultation.
April 12, 2012.ML12150A308.
April 12, 2012.ML12150A308.
22 NRC's Biological Assessment Supplement for Atlantic  
22 NRC's Biological Assessment Supplement for Atlantic Sturgeon, Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, Proposed License Renewal. February 2012. ML12047A1 19.23 Letter from A. Imboden, RERB Branch Chief, NRC, to P. Kurkul, Northeast Regional Administrator, NMFS, Request for concurrence on determination of effects concerning Atlantic sturgeon at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station. February 29, 2012. ML12047A1 19.24 Letter from D. Morris, Acting Northeast Regional Administrator, NMFS, to A. Imboden, RERB Branch Chief, NRC, Regarding coordination with NMFS for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station.March 26, 2012. ML12087A025.
: Sturgeon, Pilgrim Nuclear PowerStation, Proposed License Renewal.
25 Letter from D. Morris, Acting Northeast Regional Director, NMFS, to A. Imboden, RERB Branch Chief, NRC, Concluding informal section 7 consultation for the Pilgrim license renewal. May 17, 2012. ML12145A072.
February 2012. ML12047A1 19.23 Letter from A. Imboden, RERB Branch Chief, NRC, to P. Kurkul, Northeast RegionalAdministrator, NMFS, Request for concurrence on determination of effects concerning Atlantic sturgeon at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station.
26 NRC's Biological Assessment for Atlantic Sturgeon at Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2, Continued Operation.
February 29, 2012. ML12047A1 19.24 Letter from D. Morris, Acting Northeast Regional Administrator, NMFS, to A. Imboden, RERBBranch Chief, NRC, Regarding coordination with NMFS for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station.March 26, 2012. ML12087A025.
March 2012. ML1 2060A1 31. 27 Letter from A. Imboden, RERB Branch Chief, NRC, to P. Kurkul, Northeast Regional Administrator, NMFS, Request to initiate informal section 7 consultation for Atlantic sturgeon at Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2. March 20, 2012. ML12060A131.
25 Letter from D. Morris, Acting Northeast Regional  
: Director, NMFS, to A. Imboden, RERBBranch Chief, NRC, Concluding informal section 7 consultation for the Pilgrim licenserenewal.
May 17, 2012. ML12145A072.
26 NRC's Biological Assessment for Atlantic Sturgeon at Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2,Continued Operation.
March 2012. ML1 2060A1 31. 27 Letter from A. Imboden, RERB Branch Chief, NRC, to P. Kurkul, Northeast RegionalAdministrator, NMFS, Request to initiate informal section 7 consultation for Atlantic sturgeonat Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2. March 20, 2012. ML12060A131.
28 Email from N. Bailey, ESA Consultant, NMFS, to B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, Requesting additional information about Brunswick thermal plume. May 1, 2012. ML12137A032.
28 Email from N. Bailey, ESA Consultant, NMFS, to B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, Requesting additional information about Brunswick thermal plume. May 1, 2012. ML12137A032.
29 Letter from C. Taylor, Electric Environmental Services  
29 Letter from C. Taylor, Electric Environmental Services Director, Dominion Resource Services, Inc., to B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, Reply to NRC request for additional information regarding ESA consultation for continued operations of Surry. May 7, 2012. ML12131A551.
: Director, Dominion Resource  
: Services, Inc., to B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, Reply to NRC request for additional information regarding ESA consultation for continued operations of Surry. May 7, 2012. ML12131A551.
30 Email from B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, to J. Crocker, Fisheries Biologist, NMFS, Forwarding responses to NMFS's April 4, 2012, questions on Surry cooling system and thermal plume.May 8, 2012. ML12151A089.}}
30 Email from B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, to J. Crocker, Fisheries Biologist, NMFS, Forwarding responses to NMFS's April 4, 2012, questions on Surry cooling system and thermal plume.May 8, 2012. ML12151A089.}}

Revision as of 04:01, 14 July 2018

Memo from B. Balsam, NRR and D. Logan, NRR to J. Susco, NRR on Summary of Section 7 Consultation Activities Related to the National Marine Fisheries Service'S Final Rule to List the Atlantic Sturgeon
ML13196A220
Person / Time
Site: Millstone, Calvert Cliffs, Salem, Indian Point, Oyster Creek, Hope Creek, Pilgrim, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Waterford  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/06/2012
From: Balsam B A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Matthew Smith, Susco J, Uttal S L
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, NRC/OGC
References
FOIA/PA-2013-0135
Download: ML13196A220 (10)


Text

June 6, 2012 MEMORANDUM TO: Jeremy J. Susco, Acting Chief Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Briana A. Balsam, Biologist IRA]Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Dennis T. Logan, Aquatic Biologist IRA!Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal*Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF SECTION 7 CONSULTATION ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE'S FINAL RULE TO LIST THE ATLANTIC STURGEON On February 6, 2012, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) listed five distinct population segments (DPSs) of the Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA).1 As a result of the Atlantic sturgeon's listing, the Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch (RERB) staff reviewed the potential for each U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)-licensed operating reactor to adversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon in order to identify plants for which the NRC must initiate section 7 consultation pursuant to the ESA.RERB staff identified 10 operating reactors within the Atlantic sturgeon's range. Of these, the RERB staff identified six operating reactors that have the potential to adversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon or for which the staff was unsure of the potential effects to Atlantic sturgeon upon preliminary review. This memo summarizes the NRC's actions to date pursuant to the ESA for each of the 10 operating reactors.Brunswick Steam Electric Plant (Southport, NC)Atlantic sturgeon juveniles and migrating adults are likely to occur in the Cape Fear River in the vicinity of the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant (Brunswick) intake, and adults may occur in the Atlantic Ocean in the vicinity of the Brunswick discharge.

Thus, the NRC staff prepared a biological assessment 2 that considered the potential impacts of continued operation through the end of the facility's renewed license terms. In the biological assessment, the staff concluded that Brunswick is not likely to adversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon.

The NRC transmitted the 3lLA7

, a J. Susco biological assessment to the NMFS and requested concurrence with the staff's effect determination by letter dated March 26, 2012.'On May 1, 2012, Ms. Nicole Bailey, NMFS, contacted Ms. Briana Balsam, NRC, to request additional information regarding Brunswick's cooling water system and associated thermal plume.4 The NRC responded to these requests by e-mail on May 15, 2012.5 At this time, NMFS and NRC are still in consultation regarding Atlantic sturgeon at Brunswick.

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant (Lusby, MD)Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant (Calvert Cliffs) is a two-unit once-through cooling system plant that withdraws and discharges water from the Chesapeake Bay. RERB staff reviewed information in the NRC's 1999 supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) for the Calvert Cliffs license renewal, 6 the NRC's 2011 environmental impact statement (EIS) for the combined license (COL) for Calvert Cliffs, Unit 3,7 and available scientific literature on the Chesapeake Bay population of Atlantic sturgeon.The NRC did not consider impacts to the Atlantic sturgeon in its 1999 SEIS. However, the NRC staff considered impacts to Atlantic sturgeon in its COL EIS, which indicated that no Atlantic sturgeon appeared in entrainment samples collected at the Calvert Cliffs intake in 2006 and 2007 or in samples collected during the same time period outside the baffle wall. Additionally, no Atlantic sturgeon occurred in impingement samples collected from 1975 through 1995.Based on the lack of evidence that Atlantic sturgeon occur in the vicinity of Calvert Cliffs, RERB staff concluded that the continued operation of Calvert Cliffs would have no effect on Atlantic sturgeon.

Thus, the NRC did not initiate consultation with NMFS or take any further actions pursuant to the ESA for Calvert Cliffs.Indian Point Nuclear Generating (Buchanan, NY)Juvenile Atlantic sturgeon occur near Indian Point Nuclear Generating (Indian Point) because they migrate downstream to estuarine waters. Though sturgeon tend to stay in deeper channels, Entergy's records indicate that Indian Point has impinged some juvenile Atlantic sturgeon in the past. Migrating adults also occur near the plant, but should be able to avoid the low intake velocities of the Indian Point cooling water intake.The NRC requested reinitiation of formal consultation for the Atlantic sturgeon at Indian Point on May 16, 2012.8 A biological assessment 9 accompanied this request. Previous to this request, the NRC submitted to NMFS a biological assessment for shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum) in December 200810 as part of a now-concluded formal section 7 consultation for the proposed license renewal of Indian Point. The NRC supplemented its December 2008 biological assessment in December 2010.11 The supplement included additional information on the shortnose sturgeon and some information on the Atlantic sturgeon (a candidate species at the time). The NRC supplemented its December 2008 biological assessment a second time in July 201112 due to the availability of a new triaxial survey of the Indian Point thermal effluent.The NRC's May 2012 biological assessment incorporated, by reference, the NRC's past biological assessments and included additional information on impingement and entrainment of Atlantic sturgeon.

In the assessment, the NRC concluded that continued operation of Indian Point may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect, the Atlantic sturgeon.

To date, the NMFS J. Susco has not requested additional information from NRC regarding this consultation.

NMFS and NRC remain in consultation regarding Atlantic sturgeon at Indian Point at this time.Millstone Power Station (Waterford, CT)Millstone Power Station (Millstone) is a two-unit once-through cooling system plant that withdraws and discharges water from Long Island Sound. The plant is located in Waterford, Connecticut, on Millstone Point, between the Niantic and Thames Rivers. Salinity levels within this area of the Sound range from 26 to 30 parts per thousand.

Because of the high salinity levels, only adult Atlantic sturgeon would occur in the vicinity of Millstone.

Adults should be able to avoid the low intake velocities of the Millstone cooling water intake. Additionally, the NRC did not identify any records indicating that Millstone has impinged Atlantic sturgeon in the past. The NRC concluded that the continued operation of Millstone would have no effect on Atlantic sturgeon.

Thus, the NRC did not initiate consultation with NMFS or take any further actions pursuant to the ESA for Millstone.

Hope Creek and Salem Nuclear Generating Stations (Hancocks Bridge, NJ)At the time the NMFS published its final rule listing the Atlantic sturgeon, the NRC and NMFS were already in formal consultation for Hope Creek and Salem Nuclear Generating Stations (Hope Creek and Salem). The NRC initiated formal section 7 consultation by letter dated December 13, 2010.13 The NRC enclosed in that letter the staffs biological assessment," 4 which considered the impacts of the proposed license renewal of Hope Creek and Salem operating licenses on shortnose sturgeon, Atlantic sturgeon, and four species of sea turtles.On April 14, 2011, PSEG Nuclear, LLC (PSEG) notified the NRC bye-mail that a dead Atlantic sturgeon had been found on the Salem intake structure trash bars on March 18, 2011.15 At that time, the Atlantic sturgeon was a proposed species, and the March 181h impingement was the only known impingement of the species at Salem since it had become a proposed species in October 2010. NRC requested a formal conference for the species by letter dated May 2, 2011 .1 PSEG has not reported any additional instances of Atlantic sturgeon impingements to the NRC to date.The NMFS issued a draft biological opinion for Salem on December 8, 2011 .The NRC and PSEG provided comments on the draft biological opinion on January 4, 2011 ,1 and January 11, 2011,19 respectively.

At the time the NMFS published its final rule listing the Atlantic sturgeon, NMFS and NRC were in the process of resolving comments on the draft biological opinion. The NRC requested that NMFS include the Atlantic sturgeon in the ongoing formal consultation by letter dated March 13, 2012.20 In an April 12, 2012, e-mail, 2 1 Julie Crocker, NMFS, stated that she was working to incorporate the Atlantic sturgeon in the draft biological opinion. Ms. Crocker indicated that she would provide the NRC with a revised draft by May 1, 2012. However, the NRC has not received a revised draft to date. At this time, NMFS and NRC are still in consultation regarding Hope Creek and Salem.Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Forked River, NJ)Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek) is a one-unit once-through cooling system plant that withdraws and discharges water from Bamegat Bay. Salinity levels in the vicinity of the plant reach as high as 32 parts per thousand.

Similar to Millstone, the NRC J. Susco concluded that only adult Atlantic sturgeon have the potential to occur in the vicinity of Oyster Creek because of the high salinity levels. Adults should be able to avoid the low intake velocities of the Millstone cooling water intake. The NRC did not identify any records indicating that Oyster Creek has impinged Atlantic sturgeon in the past. The NRC concluded that the continued operation of Oyster Creek would have no effect on Atlantic sturgeon.

Thus, the NRC did not initiate consultation with NMFS or take any further actions pursuant to the ESA for Oyster Creek.Pil-grim Nuclear Power Station (Plymouth, MA)Subadults and adult Atlantic sturgeon are expected to occur in Cape Cod occasionally during migration, but the available literature does not indicate that they are common to the Plymouth area near the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (Pilgrim).

However, NRC staff prepared a biological assessment 2 2 in February 2012 to ensure that the staff considered all potential impacts to the species that would result from the proposed license renewal. The February 2012 biological assessment supplemented the staff's December 2006 biological assessment, which considered the potential effects of the proposed license renewal on four species of sea turtles, five species of whales, and the shortnose sturgeon.

In its supplemental biological assessment, the staff concluded that the proposed license renewal would have no effect on the Atlantic sturgeon.

The NRC transmitted the supplemental biological assessment to the NMFS and requested concurrence with the staffs determination by letter dated February 29, 2012.23 On March 26, 2012, the NMFS sent a letter to the NRC summarizing a March 22, 2012, conference call between the NMFS and NRC.2 4 The letter indicated that NMFS is unable to concur with the NRC's "no effect" determination because listed species are present in the action area and may be exposed to the effects on Pilgrim operations.

In a letter dated May 17, 2012,25 the NMFS concluded that the continued operation of Pilgrim may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon and 10 other listed species under NMFS jurisdiction.

This letter concluded informal section 7 consultation for both license renewal and the Atlantic sturgeon listing.Seabrook Station (Seabrook, NH)Seabrook Station (Seabrook) is a one-unit once-through cooling system plant that withdraws and discharges water from the Atlantic Ocean. Because of the plant's location, only adult Atlantic sturgeon have the potential to occur in the vicinity of the plant. Adults should be able to avoid the low intake velocities of the Seabrook cooling water intake. Additionally, the NRC did not identify any records indicating that Seabrook has impinged Atlantic sturgeon in the past.The NRC concluded that the continued operation of Seabrook would have no effect on Atlantic sturgeon.

Thus, the NRC did not initiate consultation with NMFS or take any further actions pursuant to the ESA for Seabrook.Surry Power Station (Surry, VA)Atlantic sturgeon larvae and migrating adults are likely to occur in the James River in the vicinity of Surry Power Station (Surry). Thus, the NRC staff prepared a biological assessment 2 6 that considered the potential impacts of continued operation through the end of the facility's renewed license terms. In the biological assessment, the staff concluded that Surry is not likely to adversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon.

The NRC transmitted the biological assessment to the J. Susco-5-NMFS and requested concurrence with the staffs effect determination by letter dated March 20, 2012.27 On April 4, 2012, Ms. Julie Crocker, NMFS, contacted Ms. Briana Balsam, NRC, to request additional information regarding Surry's cooling water system and associated thermal plume.2 8 On May 7, 2012, Ms. Cathy Taylor, Dominion Resource Services, Inc. (Dominion) sent NRC answers to NMFS's questions." 9 The NRC forwarded Dominion's responses to NMFS on May 8, 2012.30 At this time, NMFS and NRC are still in consultation regarding Atlantic sturgeon at Surry.Summary and Conclusion Following the NMFS's listing of the Atlantic sturgeon under the ESA, RERB staff considered the potential for each NRC-licensed operating reactor to adversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon.

The staff identified 10 plants within the range of the Atlantic sturgeon.

Of these, the staff concluded that four plants would have no effect on the Atlantic sturgeon (Calvert Cliffs, Millstone, Oyster Creek, and Seabrook).

The staff did not prepare a biological assessment or initiate section 7 consultation for these four plants.For the remaining plants, RERB staff prepared four biological assessments to determine the potential effects of plant operation on the Atlantic sturgeon.

The staff concluded that Pilgrim would have no effect on the species, while Brunswick, Indian Point, and Surry may affect, but are not likely to adversely affect the species, The staff forwarded copies of each of these biological assessments to the appropriate NMFS office with a request to initiate consultation.

In the case of Salem and Hope Creek, the RERB staff had prepared a biological assessment in December 2010 that considered Atlantic sturgeon, which was a proposed species at the time.The staff concluded in that biological assessment that Hope Creek would have no effect and Salem may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the species. After the NMFS listed the Atlantic sturgeon, the staff sent a letter requesting that the NMFS consider the species in its biological opinion associated with the ongoing formal consultation for Salem and Hope Creek.In total between February and May 2012, the RERB staff initiated section 7 consultations for six plants as a result of the Atlantic sturgeon listing. To date, the NRC and NMFS have concluded one of these consultations (Pilgrim).

The staff is working with both the NMFS Northeast and Southeast Regional Offices to ensure that each office has the information that it requires to complete its review of potential effects to the Atlantic sturgeon for each of the remaining consultations.

Docket Nos. 50-219, 50-247, 50-272, 50-280, 50-281, 50-286, 50-293, 50-311, 50-317, 50-318, 50-324, 50-336, 50-354, 50-423, and 50-443 J. Susco-5-NMFS and requested concurrence with the staff's effect determination by letter dated March 20, 2012.27 On April 4, 2012, Ms. Julie Crocker, NMFS, contacted Ms. Briana Balsam, NRC, to request additional information regarding Surry's cooling water system and associated thermal plume.2 8 On May 7, 2012, Ms. Cathy Taylor, Dominion Resource Services, Inc. (Dominion) sent NRC answers to NMFS's questions.

2 The NRC forwarded Dominion's responses to NMFS on May 8, 2012.30 At this time, NMFS and NRC are still in consultation regarding Atlantic sturgeon at Surry.Summary and Conclusion Following the NMFS's listing of the Atlantic sturgeon under the ESA, RERB staff considered the potential for each NRC-licensed operating reactor to adversely affect the Atlantic sturgeon.

The staff identified 10 plants within the range of the Atlantic sturgeon.

Of these, the staff concluded that four plants would have no effect on the Atlantic sturgeon (Calvert Cliffs, Millstone, Oyster Creek, and Seabrook).

The staff did not prepare a biological assessment or initiate section 7 consultation for these four plants.For the remaining plants, RERB staff prepared four biological assessments to determine the potential effects of plant operation on the Atlantic sturgeon.

The staff concluded that Pilgrim would have no effect on the species, while Brunswick, Indian Point, and Surry may affect, but are not likely to adversely affect the species. The staff forwarded copies of each of these biological assessments to the appropriate NMFS office with a request to initiate consultation.

In the case of Salem and Hope Creek, the RERB staff had prepared a biological assessment in December 2010 that considered Atlantic sturgeon, which was a proposed species at the time.The staff concluded in that biological assessment that Hope Creek would have no effect and Salem may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the species. After the NMFS listed the Atlantic sturgeon, the staff sent a letter requesting that the NMFS consider the species in its biological opinion associated with the ongoing formal consultation for Salem and Hope Creek.In total between February and May 2012, the RERB staff initiated section 7 consultations for six plants as a result of the Atlantic sturgeon listing. To date, the NRC and NMFS have concluded one of these consultations (Pilgrim).

The staff is working with both the NMFS Northeast and Southeast Regional Offices to ensure that each office has the information that it requires to complete its review of potential effects to the Atlantic sturgeon for each of the remaining consultations.

Docket Nos. 50-219, 50-247, 50-272, 50-280, 50-281, 50-286, 50-293, 50-311, 50-317, 50-318, 50-324, 50-336, 50-354, 50-423, and 50-443 DISTRIBUTION:

See next page ADAMS Accession No: ML12152A298 OFFICE LA:RPB2:DLR PM:RERB:DLR AB:RERB:DLR NAME IKing BBalsam DLogan DATE 6/612012 6/612012 6/6/2012 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Memo to J. Susco from B. Balsam and D. Logan dated June 6, 2012

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF SECTION 7 CONSULTATION ACTIVITIES RELATED TO THE NMFS'S FINAL RULE TO LIST THE ATLANTIC STURGEON DISTRIBUTION:

NON-PUBLIC RidsNrrDIr Resource RidsNrrDIrRerb Resource RidsNrrDIrRpbl Resource RidsOgc Resource BBalsam BHolian DLogan DWrona EWilliamson JLindell JSusco LSubin MGalloway MMoser MSmith MSpencer STurk SUttal

References:

77 FR 5880. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Listing Determinations for Two Distinct Population Segments of Atlantic Sturgeon (Acipenser oxyninchus oxyrinchus) in the Northeast." Federal Register 77 (24):5880-5912.

February 6, 2012.77 FR 5914. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Final Listing Determinations for Two Distinct Population Segments of Atlantic Sturgeon (Acipenser oxyninchus oxyrinchus) in the Southeast." Federal Register 77(24):5914-5982.

February 6, 2012.2 NRC's Biological Assessment Atlantic Sturgeon at Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Continued Operation.

March 2012. ML 12065A380.

3 Letter from J. Susco, RERB Acting Chief, NRC, to R. Crabtree, Southeast Regional Administrator, NMFS, Request to reinitiate section 7 consultation for Atlantic sturgeon at Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2. March 26, 2012. ML12065A380.

4Email from N. Bailey, ESA Consultant, NMFS, to B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, Requesting additional information about Brunswick thermal plume. May 1, 2012. ML12137A032.

Email from B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, to N. Bailey, ESA Consultant, NMFS; Responses to May 1, 2012, NMFS questions on Brunswick thermal plume. May 15, 2012. ML12137A034.

6 NUREG-1437, Supplement 1, "Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2.' October 1999.7 NUREG-1 936, "Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Combined License (COL) for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 3." Letter from J. Susco, RERB Branch Chief, NRC, to P. Kurkul, Northeast Regional Administrator, NMFS, Request to reinitiate section 7 consultation for the Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 2 and 3, due to listing of Atlantic sturgeon.

May 16, 2012.ML12100A082.

9 NRC's Biological Assessment for Reinitiation of Section 7 Consultation for Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Due to Listing of Atlantic Sturgeon.

May 2012.ML1 21 00A082.10 NRC's Biological Assessment of the Potential Effects on Federally Listed Species from the Proposed Renewal of Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit Nos. 2 and 3. in Appendix E of NUREG-1437, Supplement

38. December 2008. ML083540614.

1' Letter from 0. Wrona, RPB2 Branch Chief, NRC, to M. Colligan, Assistant Northeast Regional Administrator for Protected Resources, NMFS, Revised biological assessment for license renewal of the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit Nos. 2 and 3. December 10, 2010.ML-102990043.

12 Letter from L. Bauer, RERB Branch Chief, NRC to M. Colligan, Assistant Northeast Regional Administrator for Protected Resources, NMFS, Supplement to revised biological assessment for license renewal of the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit Nos. 2 and 3. July 26, 2011. ADAMS No. ML11203A1

00. 13 Letter from B. Pham, RPB1 Branch Chief, NRC, to M. Colligan, Assistant Northeast Regional Administrator for Protected Resources, Forwarding biological assessment for license renewal of Hope Creek Generating Station and Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2.December 13, 2010. MLI 03350271.14 NRC's Biological Assessment for the Proposed License Renewal of Hope Creek Generating Station and Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2. December 2010.MLI103350271.

15 Email from R. Ranek, License Renewal Environmental Lead, Exelon Nuclear LLC, to L.Perkins, Environmental Project Manager, NRC, Regarding March 18, 2011, take of Atlantic sturgeon.

April 14, 2011. ML11105A126.

16 Letter from A. Imboden, RERB Branch Chief, NRC, to M. Colligan, Assistant Northeast Regional Administrator for Protected Resources, Requesting formal conference for the Atlantic sturgeon at the Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2. May 2, 2011.ML111091091.

17 NMFS's Draft Biological Opinion for Salem and Hope Creek. December 8, 2011.ML11353A254.

18 Email from B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, to J. Crocker, Fisheries Biologist, NMFS, Forwarding NRC's comments on draft biological opinion for Salem and Hope Creek. January 4, 2011.ML1 2011A049.19 Email from B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, to J. Crocker, Fisheries Biologist, NMFS, Forwarding PSEG's comments on draft biological opinion for Salem and Hope Creek. January 11, 2011.ML12018A446.

20 Letter from A. Imboden, RERB Branch Chief, NRC, to M. Colligan, Assistant Northeast Regional Administrator for Protected Resources, NMFS, Requesting to include Atlantic sturgeon in ongoing formal section 7 consultation for Salem. Marc h 13, 2012. ML12060A121 21 Email from J. Crocker, Fisheries Biologist, NMFS, to B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, Regarding NRC's request to include Atlantic sturgeon in the Salem section 7 consultation.

April 12, 2012.ML12150A308.

22 NRC's Biological Assessment Supplement for Atlantic Sturgeon, Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, Proposed License Renewal. February 2012. ML12047A1 19.23 Letter from A. Imboden, RERB Branch Chief, NRC, to P. Kurkul, Northeast Regional Administrator, NMFS, Request for concurrence on determination of effects concerning Atlantic sturgeon at Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station. February 29, 2012. ML12047A1 19.24 Letter from D. Morris, Acting Northeast Regional Administrator, NMFS, to A. Imboden, RERB Branch Chief, NRC, Regarding coordination with NMFS for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station.March 26, 2012. ML12087A025.

25 Letter from D. Morris, Acting Northeast Regional Director, NMFS, to A. Imboden, RERB Branch Chief, NRC, Concluding informal section 7 consultation for the Pilgrim license renewal. May 17, 2012. ML12145A072.

26 NRC's Biological Assessment for Atlantic Sturgeon at Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2, Continued Operation.

March 2012. ML1 2060A1 31. 27 Letter from A. Imboden, RERB Branch Chief, NRC, to P. Kurkul, Northeast Regional Administrator, NMFS, Request to initiate informal section 7 consultation for Atlantic sturgeon at Surry Power Station, Units 1 and 2. March 20, 2012. ML12060A131.

28 Email from N. Bailey, ESA Consultant, NMFS, to B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, Requesting additional information about Brunswick thermal plume. May 1, 2012. ML12137A032.

29 Letter from C. Taylor, Electric Environmental Services Director, Dominion Resource Services, Inc., to B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, Reply to NRC request for additional information regarding ESA consultation for continued operations of Surry. May 7, 2012. ML12131A551.

30 Email from B. Balsam, Biologist, NRC, to J. Crocker, Fisheries Biologist, NMFS, Forwarding responses to NMFS's April 4, 2012, questions on Surry cooling system and thermal plume.May 8, 2012. ML12151A089.