ML13064A323: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 9
| page count = 9
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:NRC PRESENTATION Salem Containment Sump Project Salem Containment Sump Project Bypass Testing DiscussionFebruary 28, 2013 1
MeetingAgendaMeetingAgendaIntroduction of AttendeesReview of Recent NRC/PSEG GSI 191 Correspondence Review of Recent NRC/PSEG GSI
-191 Correspondence Bypass Testing Fiber Debris Preparation OverviewStrainer Fiber Bypass Testing OverviewDiscussion Regarding NRC Bypass Testing QuestionsDiscussion Regarding NRC Bypass Testing QuestionsRemaining Tasks for GL 2004-02 Closeout 2
Introduction of AttendeesIntroduction of Attendees
*PSEG -SalemGregory Sosson
-Director Salem Engineering Gregory Sosson Director Salem EngineeringSam Markos -Salem Design Engineering ManagerKiran Mathur
-Senior En g ineer , Salem Desi g n En g ineerin gg,gggPaul Duke -Licensing ManagerEmily Bauer -Lead Engineer Licensing
*Sargent & LundyBob Peterson -Senior Manager, Nuclear Plant AnalysisHelmut Kopke
-Pro ject Associate 2, Nuclear Plant Anal y sis 3 Recent NRC/PSEG Correspondence Regarding GSI-191Recent NRC/PSEG Correspondence Regarding GSI-191PSEG submitted Updated Supplemental Response to Generic Letter 200402 on April 27 2012 2004-02 on April 27
, 2012PSEG discussed fiber debris preparation methods with NRC during a phone call on November 28 2012phone call on November 28
, 2012NRC provided PSEG with a list of 18 questions regarding bypass testing on December 3 2012testing on December 3
, 2012PSEG provided NRC with a responses to all 18 questions on February 21, 201321, 2013 4 Bypass Testing Fiber Debris Preparation Bypass Testing Fiber Debris Preparation
*Differences between 2006 and 2008 fiber debris preparation methods were minor:Fibers not baked in 2006Fibers leaf shredded in 2006 and hand cut in 2008
*CCI fiber preparation methodolo gy is g enerall y consistent with the January 2012, NEI guidance with a few minor deviations:Hot plate heating versus oven bakingHot plate heating versus oven bakingFiber to water ratio prior to blasting
*Fi be r p r epa r at i o n m et h odo l ogy used f o r Sa l e m w as p r e vi ous l y bepepaatoetodoogyusedoSaeaspeousypresented to the NRC during a phone call on November 28, 2012, and was found to be acceptable 5
Strainer Fiber Bypass Testing OverviewStrainer Fiber Bypass Testing OverviewSti fib b tt  fd t CCI d
*St ra i ner fib er by pass t es t s were per f orme d a t CCI ven d or facility in 2006 and 2008
*2006 Fiber Bypass TestingPrimaril y used NUKON y insulation for testingUsed CCI t yp ical yp 1-Sided MFTL configurationTested multiple strainer sizes (i.e. different approach velocities) 6 Strainer Fiber Bypass Tes t ing OverviewStrainer Fiber Bypass Tes t ing Overview2008 Fiber Bpass Testing
*2008 Fiber Bypass TestingTests done to show Grab Sample Location2006 test results were conservativeTt dl  T es t mo d u l e was prototypicalUsed NUKON Used NUKON
, Fiberglas, & Kaowool for testingFiber Bypass Capture SLtiKaowool for testing
*Comparison between the two tests showed that 2006 test results envelope 2008 testing Screen Loca ti o n 7 envelope 2008 testing Discussion on NRC Bypass Testing QuestionsDiscussion on NRC Bypass Testing Questions
*NRC provided PSEG with 18 questions regarding Salem bypass testing on December 3 2012bypass testing on December 3
, 2012*Res ponses to NRC questions were provided to NRC on pqpFebruary 21,  2013 8
Remaining Tasks for GL 2004-02 Closeout Remaining Tasks for GL 2004-02 Closeout
*In Vessel Effects (WCAP-16793-NP and Associated SE)NRC Draft Safet y Evaluation for WCAP-16793-NP
, Revision 2
, y ,,was issued for public comment on January 29, 2013Salem will provide the GSI-191 resolution path (e.g. option) 30 d ft fil NRC Sft Elti f WCAP 16793 NP d a y s a ft er fi na l NRC S a f ety E va l ua ti on f or WCAP-16793-NPSalem will provide a response  to the final NRC Safety Evaluation on WCAP
-16793-NP within 90 days of issuance Evaluation on WCAP 16793NP within 90 days of issuance 9}}

Revision as of 16:59, 18 July 2018

NRC Presentation on Bypass Testing
ML13064A323
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 02/28/2013
From:
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
Plant Licensing Branch 1
Hughey J D
Shared Package
ml13064A317 List:
References
Download: ML13064A323 (9)


Text

NRC PRESENTATION Salem Containment Sump Project Salem Containment Sump Project Bypass Testing DiscussionFebruary 28, 2013 1

MeetingAgendaMeetingAgendaIntroduction of AttendeesReview of Recent NRC/PSEG GSI 191 Correspondence Review of Recent NRC/PSEG GSI

-191 Correspondence Bypass Testing Fiber Debris Preparation OverviewStrainer Fiber Bypass Testing OverviewDiscussion Regarding NRC Bypass Testing QuestionsDiscussion Regarding NRC Bypass Testing QuestionsRemaining Tasks for GL 2004-02 Closeout 2

Introduction of AttendeesIntroduction of Attendees

  • PSEG -SalemGregory Sosson

-Director Salem Engineering Gregory Sosson Director Salem EngineeringSam Markos -Salem Design Engineering ManagerKiran Mathur

-Senior En g ineer , Salem Desi g n En g ineerin gg,gggPaul Duke -Licensing ManagerEmily Bauer -Lead Engineer Licensing

  • Sargent & LundyBob Peterson -Senior Manager, Nuclear Plant AnalysisHelmut Kopke

-Pro ject Associate 2, Nuclear Plant Anal y sis 3 Recent NRC/PSEG Correspondence Regarding GSI-191Recent NRC/PSEG Correspondence Regarding GSI-191PSEG submitted Updated Supplemental Response to Generic Letter 200402 on April 27 2012 2004-02 on April 27

, 2012PSEG discussed fiber debris preparation methods with NRC during a phone call on November 28 2012phone call on November 28

, 2012NRC provided PSEG with a list of 18 questions regarding bypass testing on December 3 2012testing on December 3

, 2012PSEG provided NRC with a responses to all 18 questions on February 21, 201321, 2013 4 Bypass Testing Fiber Debris Preparation Bypass Testing Fiber Debris Preparation

  • Differences between 2006 and 2008 fiber debris preparation methods were minor:Fibers not baked in 2006Fibers leaf shredded in 2006 and hand cut in 2008
  • CCI fiber preparation methodolo gy is g enerall y consistent with the January 2012, NEI guidance with a few minor deviations:Hot plate heating versus oven bakingHot plate heating versus oven bakingFiber to water ratio prior to blasting
  • Fi be r p r epa r at i o n m et h odo l ogy used f o r Sa l e m w as p r e vi ous l y bepepaatoetodoogyusedoSaeaspeousypresented to the NRC during a phone call on November 28, 2012, and was found to be acceptable 5

Strainer Fiber Bypass Testing OverviewStrainer Fiber Bypass Testing OverviewSti fib b tt fd t CCI d

  • St ra i ner fib er by pass t es t s were per f orme d a t CCI ven d or facility in 2006 and 2008
  • 2006 Fiber Bypass TestingPrimaril y used NUKON y insulation for testingUsed CCI t yp ical yp 1-Sided MFTL configurationTested multiple strainer sizes (i.e. different approach velocities) 6 Strainer Fiber Bypass Tes t ing OverviewStrainer Fiber Bypass Tes t ing Overview2008 Fiber Bpass Testing
  • 2008 Fiber Bypass TestingTests done to show Grab Sample Location2006 test results were conservativeTt dl T es t mo d u l e was prototypicalUsed NUKON Used NUKON

, Fiberglas, & Kaowool for testingFiber Bypass Capture SLtiKaowool for testing

  • Comparison between the two tests showed that 2006 test results envelope 2008 testing Screen Loca ti o n 7 envelope 2008 testing Discussion on NRC Bypass Testing QuestionsDiscussion on NRC Bypass Testing Questions
  • NRC provided PSEG with 18 questions regarding Salem bypass testing on December 3 2012bypass testing on December 3

, 2012*Res ponses to NRC questions were provided to NRC on pqpFebruary 21, 2013 8

Remaining Tasks for GL 2004-02 Closeout Remaining Tasks for GL 2004-02 Closeout

, Revision 2

, y ,,was issued for public comment on January 29, 2013Salem will provide the GSI-191 resolution path (e.g. option) 30 d ft fil NRC Sft Elti f WCAP 16793 NP d a y s a ft er fi na l NRC S a f ety E va l ua ti on f or WCAP-16793-NPSalem will provide a response to the final NRC Safety Evaluation on WCAP

-16793-NP within 90 days of issuance Evaluation on WCAP 16793NP within 90 days of issuance 9