ML13064A323

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRC Presentation on Bypass Testing
ML13064A323
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 02/28/2013
From:
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
Plant Licensing Branch 1
Hughey J
Shared Package
ml13064A317 List:
References
Download: ML13064A323 (9)


Text

NRC PRESENTATION Salem Containment Sump Project Salem Containment Sump Project Bypass Testing Discussion February 28, 2013 1

Meeting Agenda Meeting Agenda Introduction of Attendees Review of Recent NRC/PSEG GSI 191 Correspondence Review of Recent NRC/PSEG GSI-191 Correspondence Bypass Testing Fiber Debris Preparation Overview Strainer Fiber Bypass Testing Overview Discussion Regarding NRC Bypass Testing Questions Discussion Regarding NRC Bypass Testing Questions Remaining Tasks for GL 2004-02 Closeout 2

Introduction of Attendees Introduction of Attendees PSEG - Salem

Gregory Sosson - Director Salem Engineering Gregory Sosson Director Salem Engineering

Sam Markos - Salem Design Engineering Manager

Kiran Mathur - Senior Engineer, Salem Design Engineering g

g g

g

Paul Duke - Licensing Manager

Emily Bauer - Lead Engineer Licensing Sargent & Lundy

Bob Peterson - Senior Manager, Nuclear Plant Analysis

Helmut Kopke - Project Associate 2, Nuclear Plant Analysis 3

Recent NRC/PSEG Correspondence Regarding GSI-191 Recent NRC/PSEG Correspondence Regarding GSI-191 PSEG submitted Updated Supplemental Response to Generic Letter 2004 02 on April 27 2012 2004-02 on April 27, 2012 PSEG discussed fiber debris preparation methods with NRC during a phone call on November 28 2012 phone call on November 28, 2012 NRC provided PSEG with a list of 18 questions regarding bypass testing on December 3 2012 testing on December 3, 2012 PSEG provided NRC with a responses to all 18 questions on February 21, 2013 21, 2013 4

Bypass Testing Fiber Debris Preparation Bypass Testing Fiber Debris Preparation

  • Differences between 2006 and 2008 fiber debris preparation methods were minor:

Fibers not baked in 2006 Fibers leaf shredded in 2006 and hand cut in 2008

  • CCI fiber preparation methodology is generally consistent with the January 2012, NEI guidance with a few minor deviations:

Hot plate heating versus oven baking Hot plate heating versus oven baking Fiber to water ratio prior to blasting

  • Fiber preparation methodology used for Salem was previously be p epa at o et odo ogy used o Sa e as p e ous y presented to the NRC during a phone call on November 28, 2012, and was found to be acceptable 5

Strainer Fiber Bypass Testing Overview Strainer Fiber Bypass Testing Overview St i fib b t

t f

d t CCI d

  • Strainer fiber bypass tests were performed at CCI vendor facility in 2006 and 2008
  • 2006 Fiber Bypass Testing Primarily used NUKON y

insulation for testing Used CCI typical yp 1-Sided MFTL configuration Tested multiple strainer sizes (i.e. different approach velocities) 6

Strainer Fiber Bypass Testing Overview Strainer Fiber Bypass Testing Overview 2008 Fiber B pass Testing

  • 2008 Fiber Bypass Testing Tests done to show Grab Sample Location 2006 test results were conservative T

t d l Test module was prototypical Used NUKON Used NUKON, Fiberglas, &

Kaowool for testing Fiber Bypass Capture S

L ti Kaowool for testing

  • Comparison between the two tests showed that 2006 test results envelope 2008 testing Screen Location 7

envelope 2008 testing

Discussion on NRC Bypass Testing Questions Discussion on NRC Bypass Testing Questions

  • NRC provided PSEG with 18 questions regarding Salem bypass testing on December 3 2012 bypass testing on December 3, 2012
  • Responses to NRC questions were provided to NRC on p

q p

February 21, 2013 8

Remaining Tasks for GL 2004-02 Closeout Remaining Tasks for GL 2004-02 Closeout

NRC Draft Safety Evaluation for WCAP-16793-NP, Revision 2, y

was issued for public comment on January 29, 2013 Salem will provide the GSI-191 resolution path (e.g. option) 30 d

ft fi l NRC S f t E l

ti f WCAP 16793 NP days after final NRC Safety Evaluation for WCAP-16793-NP Salem will provide a response to the final NRC Safety Evaluation on WCAP-16793-NP within 90 days of issuance Evaluation on WCAP 16793 NP within 90 days of issuance 9