ML061590258

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Slides for Meeting Salem Service Water Simplification Project
ML061590258
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Hope Creek  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 06/01/2006
From:
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML061590258 (11)


Text

Creek 1lP i**

  • 1~~

i.-

A now K

k

  • ib

Outin Meeting Objective Problem Statement Project Overview Objective

" Anticipated Benefits

" Technical Basis for Pursuing Project

" Scope

" Licensing Issues NRC Feedback on Project 831811 GE~NERATING S TATIN

MeeingObective Preview Salem Service Water Simplification Project Obtain NRC feedback Information necessary to support LCR LCR review schedule

  • NG STATIONS

SW system design is complex

" Different flow rates for normal and LOCA conditions

" Multiple active components change state on accident signal

" Surveillance and maintenance requirements impact system availability Repeated LCO entries

" Unplanned LCOs (23 since 1/1/05)

" Frequent entries for de-silting Sa8J35 GENERATING STATIONS

Objectives Improve safety and reliability by simplifying design L Reduce number of components with active safety functions Reduce unplanned LCOs Approach

  • Adopt lower required CFCU flow rate for LOCA conditions
  • Containment re-analysis
  • Implement fixed-resistance flow scheme
  • Restriction orifices (passive) in lieu of modulating flow controls Li Eliminate accumulator tanks
  • Transient hydraulic analyses and pipe support modifications S3IaI11kN EATIHG STATIONS

ExsigSyse Design I of2CFCU SW65\\-

SW58 SW72 \\-D Containment 15.0C Ga-Service Water Accumulator Tank SW63M3 I

SW w57 SW646 SW223 Circulating

--- Water SW76 System HX 11SW122 (12SW376)

(12SWM)

SW2 12SW2 SW22 SW Pumpq Ccc Ký 11SW20 EDG I

Coolers 1SW28 turine Building To CrowAled CFCU Figure Depicts One of TWo SW Header Per Unit SW51 SW532 lher olers ESW23 I

Other Header Sa!eI#~A!~AATNGSTATIOAIS

Anticipated Benefits Improved safety

" Fewer safety-related valves with active safety functions

  • Reduced number of potential failure modes
  • Improvement in LRF

" Reduced unplanned LCOs

  • Main flow path and flow control: 16 LCOs since 1/1/05
  • Tanks: 7 LCOs since 1/1/05 Recovery of system margin Improved industrial safety Reduced activities in containment at power
  • Heat stress Improved reliability and availability

" Simplified system

" Reduced surveillances e Reduction in number of valves requiring surveillance testing

  • Elimination of tanks wffi8Dý'GAEAIAGSAIN

Containment Re-analysis (WCAP 16503)

Available margin allows CFCU heat removal rate to be reduced Fixed-Resistance Flow Control (S.C.SW.MEE-1928)

Li Fixed-resistance flow scheme using orifices is feasible L Single flow rate of ~1500 gpm Elimination of CFCU Accumulator Tanks (MPR.2878)

NRC/Industry guidance for analytical approaches for GL 96-06 successfully applied at other sites Fixed-resistance scheme reduces severity of waterhammer for limiting case SaI8IJ GENdERATIIG STATIONS

Project Scope: Modifications Valve modifications (5 each per unit) lo12 CF(U L.aW per Nead

" Eliminate SW57 valves

" Eliminate SW65 valves Change SW223 valves to==ui=.

Abandon Ir open/shut with limit stop Orifices

  • 4 orifices per CFCU loop
  • Bypass lines to allow high flow flush of CFCUs Tank elimination (2 per unit)
  • Cut and cap injection line Abandon tanks in place Sw N Containment Cirulating I-"-,- Water SW76 system TO Cwutsied CFCU Figure Depicts One of Two SW Headem Per Unit Mp EDG Coolers SW23 1SW26 Otiw Header Turbine

.. qq~mS>)~nnp~~ekBuilding

License Change needed to:

m Reduce CFCU accident flow rate

  • Changes Tech Spec limit m Eliminate accumulator tanks e Eliminates Tech Spec criteria
  • Alters commitment that SW System remains water solid Sa81*~RTNG STATOONS

Prma ac