IR 05000193/1980001: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
{{Adams
| number = ML20137A750
| number = ML20247H622
| issue date = 05/22/1985
| issue date = 09/14/1989
| title = Ack Receipt of Application for Renewal of License 50-19380-01
| title = Discusses Insp of License 50-19380-01 on 890814 & 18 & Forwards Notice of Violation.Description of Actions to Improve Effectiveness of Overall Mgt Control Sys Requested
| author name = Riedlinger B
| author name = Pate R
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
| addressee name =  
| addressee name = Rooney J
| addressee affiliation = R&M CONSULTANTS, INC.
| addressee affiliation = R&M CONSULTANTS, INC.
| docket = 03017516
| docket = 03017516
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = 70189, NUDOCS 8508210470
| document report number = NUDOCS 8909200044
| package number = ML20136D348
| package number = ML20247H627
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, DKT 30 MTL BYPRODUCT, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, DKT 30 MTL BYPRODUCT, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 1
| page count = 3
}}
}}


Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:7 !
{{#Wiki_filter:n - - . _ . .
W-fQ "~- Q g  k1 g, {,g. ,    d y @] y 77,; .
        -
T'
p ney
) %' 4+     $*4
[:  / #o  UNITED STATES
    ;
  *
ng w ~ ~> w w
E  NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[  ]w g
  : *, #
  : neoen v 1450 MARIA LANE,SutTE 210 WALNUT CRE E K, CALIFORNtA 94696
  %*****,o#  .
        ;
    . SEP 141939  l License No. 50-19380-01 R & M Consultants, In P. O. Box 6087     ,
        !
Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Attention: Mr. James Rooney President Gentlemen:
l
  ~
Subject: NRC Inspection This refers to the routine inspection conducted by Mr. David D. Skov of this office on August 14 and 18, 1989, of activities authorized by NRC License N !
50-19380-01 and to the discussion of our findings held by Mr. Skov with M l Steven J. Dombrowski of your staff at the conclusion of the inspectio ~
j The inspection was an examination of the activities conducted under your  l license as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and the conditions of your license. The inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspecto ;
Based on the results of this inspection, it appears that certain of your  !
activities were not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements, as set l forth in the Notice of Violation enclosed as Appendix A to this lette These l items have been categorized into severity levels as described in the NRC  j Enforcement Policy, 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1989). i
        !
l The findings from this inspection, as well as the one conducted during August 27, 1984, indicate two repetitive violations (see Appendix A, Items B. and C. ).
We are concerned about the repetitive nature of the violations observed during our inspections. In addition to the need for corrective action regarding the i specific violations included in Appendix A, we are especially concerned about j the effectiveness of your management control system that permitted the  j violations to recur. Consequently, in your reply you should describe in  l particular those actions taken or planned to improve the effectiveness of your j overall management control syste On September 6, 1989, Messrs. R. D. Thomas and D. D. Skov held a telephone j management meeting with you regarding the findings of the inspection. During ;
this meeting, we emphasized the seriousness of the repetitive violations and we discussed our concerns with your management of the licensed program. You ;
were informed that further noncompliance could result in escalated enforcement !
        \
I ,,
3909200044 890914
  '[9Nh1     f j
      '
FDC yLu
      - _ - - __
 
  . _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ - __ __ __ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . ____-____- _____ ____ _ _ _
  .
  . .
  ~
'
SEP 141989-2-action including the assessment of a civil penalty and the modification, suspension or revocation of your license. You were also notified that an-early reinspection would be conducted to determine the effectiveness of your management commitment'to correct the violation Your response to this Notice is to be submitted in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 as stated in Appendix A, Notice of Violatio The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of-1980, PL 96-51 If you have any questions on this matter or concerning this inspection, we
  "-
will be glad to discuss them with yo
 
Sincerely, obert J. Pate, Chief uclear Materials Safety and Safeguards Branch
 
===Enclosure:===
Appendix A - Notice of Violation l
l
       .
       .
    %gg      1?'fQ)_
_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ M


W 2 2 835 Docket No. : 030-17516 License No.: 50-19380-01 Control No.: 70189 R & M Consultants. In P.O. Box 6087 Anchorage, Alaska 99502 SUBJECT: LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION Gentlemen:
_ _ - . . _ _ _.
This is to acknowledge receipt of your application for renewal of the material (s) license identified above. Your application is deemed timely filed, and accordingly, the license will not expire until final action has been taken by this offic Any correspondence regarding this renewal application should reference the control number specified above and your license numbe


Sincerely, Both A. Riedlinger IIealth Physicist (Licensing)
j-; '/ . ;
Nuclear Materials Safety Section PDll 50-19380- 1
s
'
-k  SEP 143939
'
    -3-
!'
b


omesV . . ......
REGION [ T'
.RV ..................... ...................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ....................
DSkov/joan gtRThmas o n i/6/89 J q/$/89  f//M89 EST COPY ] REQUEST COPY gj REQUEST PY ] RE UEST COPY ]
so . Riedlinger: F
  / NO ]l ES) / NO ] YES / NO ] ES / NO ] v -
................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ............ ....... ..................... ....................
S D TO PDR ]
e4= > 5/2485
    / NO ]
.................. ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... .................... ....................
==cronu m no,eoisacuo 4o  OFFICIAL RECORD COPY    t o.s.am i n-4 i
_ = - .v ...-.e... ..e e e .g_ w a s
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 04:12, 16 December 2021

Discusses Insp of License 50-19380-01 on 890814 & 18 & Forwards Notice of Violation.Description of Actions to Improve Effectiveness of Overall Mgt Control Sys Requested
ML20247H622
Person / Time
Site: Rhode Island Atomic Energy Commission, 03017516
Issue date: 09/14/1989
From: Pate R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Rooney J
R&M CONSULTANTS, INC.
Shared Package
ML20247H627 List:
References
NUDOCS 8909200044
Download: ML20247H622 (3)
v • d • e


Text

n - - . _ . .

-

p ney

[: / #o UNITED STATES

E NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[ ]w g

*, #
neoen v 1450 MARIA LANE,SutTE 210 WALNUT CRE E K, CALIFORNtA 94696

%*****,o# .

. SEP 141939 l License No. 50-19380-01 R & M Consultants, In P. O. Box 6087 ,

!

Anchorage, Alaska 99502 Attention: Mr. James Rooney President Gentlemen:

l

~

Subject: NRC Inspection This refers to the routine inspection conducted by Mr. David D. Skov of this office on August 14 and 18, 1989, of activities authorized by NRC License N !

50-19380-01 and to the discussion of our findings held by Mr. Skov with M l Steven J. Dombrowski of your staff at the conclusion of the inspectio ~

j The inspection was an examination of the activities conducted under your l license as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and the conditions of your license. The inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspecto ;

Based on the results of this inspection, it appears that certain of your  !

activities were not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements, as set l forth in the Notice of Violation enclosed as Appendix A to this lette These l items have been categorized into severity levels as described in the NRC j Enforcement Policy, 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1989). i

!

l The findings from this inspection, as well as the one conducted during August 27, 1984, indicate two repetitive violations (see Appendix A, Items B. and C. ).

We are concerned about the repetitive nature of the violations observed during our inspections. In addition to the need for corrective action regarding the i specific violations included in Appendix A, we are especially concerned about j the effectiveness of your management control system that permitted the j violations to recur. Consequently, in your reply you should describe in l particular those actions taken or planned to improve the effectiveness of your j overall management control syste On September 6, 1989, Messrs. R. D. Thomas and D. D. Skov held a telephone j management meeting with you regarding the findings of the inspection. During ;

this meeting, we emphasized the seriousness of the repetitive violations and we discussed our concerns with your management of the licensed program. You ;

were informed that further noncompliance could result in escalated enforcement !

\

I ,,

3909200044 890914

'[9Nh1 f j

'

FDC yLu

- _ - - __

. _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ - __ __ __ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . ____-____- _____ ____ _ _ _

.

. .

~

'

SEP 141989-2-action including the assessment of a civil penalty and the modification, suspension or revocation of your license. You were also notified that an-early reinspection would be conducted to determine the effectiveness of your management commitment'to correct the violation Your response to this Notice is to be submitted in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 as stated in Appendix A, Notice of Violatio The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of-1980, PL 96-51 If you have any questions on this matter or concerning this inspection, we

"-

will be glad to discuss them with yo

Sincerely, obert J. Pate, Chief uclear Materials Safety and Safeguards Branch

Enclosure:

Appendix A - Notice of Violation l

l

.

_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ M

_ _ - . . _ _ _.

j-; '/ . ;

s

'

-k SEP 143939

'

-3-

!'

b

REGION [ T'

DSkov/joan gtRThmas o n i/6/89 J q/$/89 f//M89 EST COPY ] REQUEST COPY gj REQUEST PY ] RE UEST COPY ]

/ NO ]l ES) / NO ] YES / NO ] ES / NO ] v -

S D TO PDR ]

/ NO ]

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000193/1980001&oldid=3381486"