ML20155C878: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project = TAC:MA3890
| stage = Other
}}
}}


Line 26: Line 28:
==Dear Mr. Roche:==
==Dear Mr. Roche:==


The Oyster Creek Generating Station Opemting License, paragraph 2.C 5, regarding subject inspection requires that authorization be ob'ained from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff before the plant is restarted from the refueling outage. By letter dated October 22, 1998, GPU Nuclear, Inc., submitted the Core Spray System inspection Program - 17R Topical I                              Report No. TR-119, Project No. 32005, for NRC staff review.
The Oyster Creek Generating Station Opemting License, paragraph 2.C 5, regarding subject inspection requires that authorization be ob'ained from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff before the plant is restarted from the refueling outage. By {{letter dated|date=October 22, 1998|text=letter dated October 22, 1998}}, GPU Nuclear, Inc., submitted the Core Spray System inspection Program - 17R Topical I                              Report No. TR-119, Project No. 32005, for NRC staff review.
l I
l I
In your letter, you informed the staff that visual examinations were performed in accordance with the recommendations in the BWRVIP-18, "BWR Core Spray Intemals inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines." The inspection scope included the in-vessel annulus piping, sparger assemblies, sparger brackets, and repair clamps. A supplemental air test was also performed to identify the through wall flaws. You indicated that cleaning with a nylon brush attached to an underwater motor was necessary prior to the inspection of the core spray annulus piping welds
In your letter, you informed the staff that visual examinations were performed in accordance with the recommendations in the BWRVIP-18, "BWR Core Spray Intemals inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines." The inspection scope included the in-vessel annulus piping, sparger assemblies, sparger brackets, and repair clamps. A supplemental air test was also performed to identify the through wall flaws. You indicated that cleaning with a nylon brush attached to an underwater motor was necessary prior to the inspection of the core spray annulus piping welds

Latest revision as of 22:08, 9 December 2021

Informs That Oyster Creek Generating Station Operating License,Paragraph 2.C.5 Re Evaluation of Core Spray Internals Insp Requires Authorization from NRC Before Plant Is Restarted from Refueling Outage.Plant Restart Authorized
ML20155C878
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 10/29/1998
From: Eaton R
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Roche M
GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
References
TAC-MA3890, NUDOCS 9811030038
Download: ML20155C878 (2)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _

Mr. Micharl B. Rocha Vice Prssidsnt cnd Dirsctor GPU Nucisir, Inc.

Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station i P.O. Box 388 Forked River, NJ 08731

SUBJECT:

EVALUATION OF THE CORE SPRAY INTERNALS INSPECTION RESULTS i

OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION (TAC NO. MA3890) l

Dear Mr. Roche:

The Oyster Creek Generating Station Opemting License, paragraph 2.C 5, regarding subject inspection requires that authorization be ob'ained from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff before the plant is restarted from the refueling outage. By letter dated October 22, 1998, GPU Nuclear, Inc., submitted the Core Spray System inspection Program - 17R Topical I Report No. TR-119, Project No. 32005, for NRC staff review.

l I

In your letter, you informed the staff that visual examinations were performed in accordance with the recommendations in the BWRVIP-18, "BWR Core Spray Intemals inspection and Flaw Evaluation Guidelines." The inspection scope included the in-vessel annulus piping, sparger assemblies, sparger brackets, and repair clamps. A supplemental air test was also performed to identify the through wall flaws. You indicated that cleaning with a nylon brush attached to an underwater motor was necessary prior to the inspection of the core spray annulus piping welds

! and spargers end cap welds. Based on the results of the inspection, you have concluded that there is no change from previous inspections, because no new indications have been identified i and there is no change in existing indications or flaws.

It should be noted that the staff has completed its review of BWRVIP-18 and a safety evaluation report (SER) was issued on June 8,1998. The staff has endorsed the BWRVIP-18 for generic applications to all BWRs; however, the staff has concems regarding some of the recommendations in BWRVIP-18. These concems are identified in the staffs SER. Therefore, if you intend to follow the BWRVIP-18 guidance in the future, you should address these concerns on a plant specific basis. Currently, the staff is in the process of resolving these concems with the BWRVIP and expects resolution soon.

On the basis of the staff's review of the information provided in the report, the staff concludes that the inspection results are acceptable. Therefore plant restart can be authorized. This authorization applies to license condition 2.C.5.

This completes the staffs effort on TAC No. MA3890.

Sincerely, g l Ori inal signed by:

Ron Id B. Eaton, Senior Project Manager 9811030038 981029 PDR ADOCK 05000219 Project Directorate 1-3 .

P PDR Division of Reactor Projects - 1/11 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation \[n\

l Docket No. 50-219 l cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION 6, JZwolinski OGC PUBLIC REaton ACRS l

PDI-3 Rdg.

DOCUMENT NAME: G:\EATON\ma3890.ltr TClark PEselgroth, RI g Mj p { {i" [ ] ] h h

To receive a c0py of this document, indicate in the box
"C" - Copy without

, attachment / enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment / enclosure "N" - No copy 0FFICE PDI 3/PM ///[/4 _- l l P013/LA fj[) lE P0J/3/} - f N L NAME REaton / # # TClark i_Ji/ M ,(Ths6t , /

DATE /M / 79 /98 /0 /M /98 7ffM /98 0FFICIAL RfCORD COPY

s M. Roche GPU Nuclear, Inc.

cc:

Emest L. Blake, Jr., Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 2300 N Street, NW 1 Washington, DC 20037 Regional Administrator, Region i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406-1415

)

i BWR Licensing Manager '

GPU Nuclear Corporation 1 Upper Pond Road l Parsippany, NJ 07054 Mayor Lacey Township 818 West Lacey Road Forked River, NJ 08731 Licensing Manager Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Mail Stop: Site Emergency Bldg.

P.O. Box 388 -

Forked River, NJ 08731 Resident inspector c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 445 Forked River, NJ 08731 Kent Tosch, Chief New Jersey Department of

. Environmental Protection Bureau of Nuclear Engineering CN 415 Trenton, NJ 08625 i

i

-'