IR 05000333/2015502: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 2100 RENAISSANCE BLVD., SUITE 100 KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406
[[Issue date::December 3, 2015]]
-2713 December 3, 2015 Mr. Brian Sullivan Site Vice President Entergy Nuclear Northeast James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant P. O. Box 110


Mr. Brian Sullivan Site Vice President Entergy Nuclear Northeast James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant P. O. Box 110 Lycoming, NY 13093
Lycoming, NY 13093


SUBJECT: JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT: NRC EVALUATED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE - INSPECTION REPORT 05000333/2015502
SUBJECT:
JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT: NRC EVALUATED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE  
- INSPECTION REPORT 05000333/2015502


==Dear Mr. Sullivan:==
==Dear Mr. Sullivan:==
On October 23, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection of the October 20, 2015, evaluated emergency preparedness exercise at your James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on October 23, 2015, with you and other members of your staff.
On October 23, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection of the October 20, 2015, evaluated emergency preparedness exercise at your James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on October 23
, 2015, with you and other members of your staff
.
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.


The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified.
 
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulation (10 CFR) 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's document system, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).


Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified. In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulation (10 CFR) 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's document system, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading
-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).


Sincerely,/RA/ Raymond R. McKinley, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No.: 50-333 License No.: DPR-59  
Sincerely,/RA/ Raymond R. Mc Kinley, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No.: 50-333 License No.: DPR-59  


===Enclosure:===
===Enclosure:===
NRC Inspection Report No. 05000333/2015502 cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ D. Musick, RAC Chair, FEMA Region II Mr. Brian Sullivan Site Vice President Entergy Nuclear Northeast James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant P. O. Box 110 Lycoming, NY 13093 SUBJECT: JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT: NRC EVALUATED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE - INSPECTION REPORT 05000333/2015502 Dear M
NRC Inspection Report No. 05000 333/2015502 cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ D. Musick, RAC Chair, FEMA Region II
 
Mr. Brian Sullivan Site Vice President Entergy Nuclear Northeast James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant P. O. Box 110
 
Lycoming, NY 13093
 
SUBJECT:
JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
: NRC EVALUATED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE  
- INSPECTION REPORT 05000333/2015502 Dear M


=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
Inspection Report 05000333/2015502; 10/19 - 23/2015; James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (FitzPatrick); Exercise Evaluation - Hostile Action (HA) Event; Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review; Performance Indicator Verification. This was an announced inspection conducted by four Region I-based inspectors and one headquarters-based inspector. No findings were identified during the inspection. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revision 5.
Inspection Report 05000333/2015502; 10/19 - 23/2015; James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (FitzPatrick)
; Exercise Evaluation- Hostile Action (HA) Event; Exercise Evaluation- Scenario Review; Performance Indicator Verification
. This was an announced inspection conducted by four Region I-based inspectors and one headquarters-based inspector. No findings were identified during the inspection. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revisio n 5.


===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness===
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.


Line 48: Line 68:


===Cornerstone:===
===Cornerstone:===
Emergency Preparedness (EP) 1EP7 Exercise Evaluation - Hostile Action Event (71114.07 - 1 Sample)
 
Emergency Preparedness (EP)1EP7 Exercise Evaluation
- Hostile Action Event (71114.07 - 1 Sample)


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.j, requires in part that nuclear power reactor licensees, in each eight calendar year exercise cycle, provide the opportunity for their emergency response organization (ERO) to demonstrate proficiency in the key skills necessary to respond to a hostile action (HA) directed at the plant site. Entergy designed the October 20, 2015, FitzPatrick EP exercise to satisfy that requirement, and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspected the FitzPatrick HA event exercise to assess Entergy's ability to effectively implement the FitzPatrick Emergency Plan during an HA event. This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle. The exercise evaluation consisted of the following review and assessment:  The adequacy of the Entergy FitzPatrick ERO's performance in the biennial full-participation exercise regarding the implementation of the risk significant planning standards (RSPS) described in 10 CFR 50.47(b) (4), (5), (9), and (10), which are:  emergency classification; offsite notification; radiological assessment; onsite protective actions, and public protective action recommendations, respectively.
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 50
, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.j, requires in part that nuclear power reactor licensees, in each eight calendar year exercise cycle, provide the opportunity for their emergency response organization (ERO) to demonstrate proficiency in the key skills necessary to respond to a hostile action (HA) directed at the plant site.


The overall adequacy of Entergy's FitzPatrick emergency response facilities with regard to Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were:  the Control Room Simulator, the Alternative Facility, the Central Alarm Station (CAS), the local law enforcement Incident Command Post (ICP), and the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF).
Entergy designed th e October 20
, 2015, FitzPatrick EP exercise to satisfy that requirement, and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (
NRC) inspected the FitzPatrick HA event exercise to assess Entergy's ability to effectively implement the FitzPatrick Emergency Plan during an HA event.


A review of other performance areas, such as:  the Entergy FitzPatrick ERO's:  recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, including interactions with site security staff; intra- and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigating activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies, including local law enforcement agencies; staffing and procedure adequacy; and the overall implementation of the FitzPatrick Emergency Plan and its implementing procedures.
This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle.
 
The exercise evaluation consisted of the following review and assessment:
The adequacy of the Entergy FitzPatrick ERO's performance in the biennial full-participation exercise regarding the implementation of the risk significant planning standards (RSPS) described in 10 CFR 50.47(b
) (4), (5), (9), and (10), which are
:  emergency classification; offsite notification; radiological assessment
; onsite protective actions
, and public protective action recommendations
, respectively.
 
The overall adequacy of Entergy's FitzPatrick emergency response facilities with regard to Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were
:  the Control Room Simulator
, the Alternative Facility
, the Central Alarm Station (CAS),
the local law enforcement Incident Command Post (ICP
), and the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF
).
 
A review of other performance areas, such as
:  the Entergy FitzPatrick ERO's:  recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, including interactions with site security staff; intra- and inter
-facility communications; prioritization of mitigating activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies, including local law enforcement agencies; staffing and procedure adequacy; and the overall implementation of the FitzPatrick Emergency Plan and its implementing procedures.


A review of past performance issues from the last NRC FitzPatrick exercise inspection report and recent Entergy FitzPatrick EP drill reports, to determine the effectiveness of licensee corrective actions as demonstrated during the October 20, 2015, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).
A review of past performance issues from the last NRC FitzPatrick exercise inspection report and recent Entergy FitzPatrick EP drill reports, to determine the effectiveness of licensee corrective actions as demonstrated during the October 20, 2015, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).


The licensee's post-exercise critiques, to evaluate Entergy's self-assessment of its FitzPatrick ERO performance during the October 20, 2015, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR, Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.g. The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.
The licensee's post
-exercise critiques, to evaluate Entergy's self-assessment of its FitzPatrick ERO performance during the October 20, 2015, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR
, Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.g.
 
The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings were identified. 1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review (71114.08 - 1 Sample)
No findings were identified.
 
1EP8 Exercise Evaluation
- Scenario Review (71114.08 - 1 Sample)


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Prior to the October 20, 2015, emergency preparedness exercise, the NRC inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario, which Entergy had submitted to the NRC, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the FitzPatrick Emergency Plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle.
Prior to the October 2 0, 2015, emergency preparedness exercise, the NRC inspectors conducted an in
 
-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario, which Entergy had submitted to the NRC, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the FitzPatrick Emergency Plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle
.
The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.
The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.


Line 74: Line 127:
==OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)==
==OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)==
{{a|4OA1}}
{{a|4OA1}}
==4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification (71151 - 3 Samples)==
==4OA1 Performance Indicator==
 
Verification (71151 - 3 Samples)


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed data for the FitzPatrick EP Performance Indicators (PI), which are:  (1) Drill and Exercise Performance (DEP) (EP01); (2) ERO Drill Participation (EP02); and (3) Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability (EP03). The last NRC EP inspection at FitzPatrick was conducted in the third calendar quarter of 2014, so the inspectors reviewed supporting documentation from EP drills and tests from the third calendar quarter of 2014 through the third calendar quarter of 2015, to verify the accuracy of the reported PI data. The review of these PIs was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, using the acceptance criteria documented in NEI 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guidelines," Revision 7. This inspection activity represented the completion of three samples.
The inspectors reviewed data for the FitzPatrick EP Performance Indicators (
PI), which are:  (1) Drill and Exercise Performance (DEP)
(EP01); (2) ERO Drill Participation (EP02); and (3) Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability (EP03). The last NRC EP inspection at FitzPatrick was conducted in the third calendar quarter of 201 4, so the inspectors reviewed supporting documentation from EP drills and tests from the third calendar quarter of 201 4 through the third calendar quarter of 201 5, to verify the accuracy of the reported PI data. The review of these PIs was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, using the acceptance criteria documented in NEI 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guidelines," Revision 7
. This inspection activity represented the completion of three samples.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 83: Line 141:


{{a|4OA6}}
{{a|4OA6}}
==4OA6 Meetings, including Exit==
==4OA6 Meetings,==
On October 23, 2014, the inspectors presented the results of this inspection to Mr. B. Sullivan, FitzPatrick Site Vice President, and other members of the Entergy staff. The inspectors verified that no proprietary information was retained by the inspectors or documented in this report.


ATTACHMENT
including Exit On October 23, 2014, the inspectors presented the results of this inspection to Mr. B. Sullivan, FitzPatrick Site Vice President
, and other members of the Entergy staff. The inspectors verified that no proprietary information was retained by the inspectors or documented in this report
.
ATTACHMENT


=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION=
Line 93: Line 153:


===Licensee Personnel===
===Licensee Personnel===
: [[contact::B. Sullivan]], FitzPatrick Site Vice President  
B. Sullivan
: [[contact::M. Wilson]], Entergy Emergency Planning Manager  
, FitzPatrick
: [[contact::J. Jones]], FitzPatrick Emergency Planning Manager  
Site Vice President
M. Wilson
, Entergy Emergency Planning Manager
: [[contact::J. Jones]], FitzPatrick Emergency Planning Manager
 
==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED==
==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED==
None.   
None.   
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
==Section 1EP7: Exercise Evaluation - Hostile Action (HA) Event James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Plan==
Section 1EP7
: IAP-2, Classification of Emergency Conditions, Revision 34
:
: Exercise Evaluation
- Hostile Action (HA) Event James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Plan
: IAP-2, Classification of Emergency Conditions, Revision 3
: EAP-1.1, Offsite Notifications, Revision 71
: EAP-1.1, Offsite Notifications, Revision 71
: EAP-14.8, Alternate TSC/OSC Activation and Operation, Revision 1
: EAP-14.8, Alternate TSC/OSC Activation and Operation, Revision 1
Line 106: Line 174:
: EN-EP-307, Hostile Action Based Drills and Exercises, Revision 3
: EN-EP-307, Hostile Action Based Drills and Exercises, Revision 3
: EN-EP-308, Emergency Planning Critiques, Revision 3
: EN-EP-308, Emergency Planning Critiques, Revision 3
: EN-EP-609, Emergency Operations Facility Operations, Revision 1 FitzPatrick Emergency Plan lmplementing Procedures FitzPatrick October 20, 2015, Emergency Exercise Scenario Package FitzPatrick Emergency Preparedness Drill Reports, January 2014 - October 2015
: EN-EP-609, Emergency Operations Facility Operations, Revision 1
: JEP-15-0049, October 20, 2015, Exercise Report, dated November 6, 2015
: FitzPatrick Emergency Plan lmplementing Procedures FitzPatrick October 2
: 0, 2015, Emergency Exercise Scenario Package FitzPatrick Emergency Preparedness Drill Reports, January 201
- October 2015
: JEP-15-0049, October 20, 2015, Exercise Report, dated November 6
, 2015


==Section 1EP8: Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Plan==
==Section 1EP8: Exercise Evaluation==
 
- Scenario Review James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Plan
: EN-EP-306, Drills and Exercises, Revision 6
: EN-EP-306, Drills and Exercises, Revision 6
: EN-EP-307, Hostile Action Based Drills and Exercises, Revision 3 FitzPatrick October 20, 2015, Emergency Exercise Scenario Package
: EN-EP-307, Hostile Action Based Drills and Exercises, Revision 3
: FitzPatrick October 20, 2015, Emergency Exercise Scenario Package


==Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator (PI) Verification==
==Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator (PI) Verification==
: EN-FAP-EP-005, Fleet Administrative Procedure Emergency Preparedness Performance Indicators, Revision 0
: EN-FAP-EP-005, Fleet Administrative Procedure Emergency Preparedness Performance Indicators, Revision 0
: EN-LI-114, Performance Indicator Process, Revision 6 ANS Reliability PI Data, July 2014 - September 2015 DEP PI Data, July 2014 - September 2015 ERO Drill Participation PI data, July 2014 - September 2015
: EN-LI-114, Performance Indicator Process, Revision 6
: ANS Reliability
: PI Data, July 2014  
- September 2015
: DEP PI Data, July 2014 - September
: 2015 ERO Drill Participation PI data, July 2014  
- September 2015
==LIST OF ACRONYMS==
==LIST OF ACRONYMS==
: [[ADAMS]] [[Agencywide Documents Access and Management System]]
: [[ADAMS]] [[Agencywide Documents Access and Management System]]
Line 130: Line 211:
: [[NRC]] [[Nuclear Regulatory Commission]]
: [[NRC]] [[Nuclear Regulatory Commission]]
: [[PAR]] [[Protective Action Recommendation]]
: [[PAR]] [[Protective Action Recommendation]]
: [[PI]] [[Performance Indicator RSPS Risk Significant Planning Standard]]
PI Performance Indicator
: [[RSPS]] [[Risk Significant Planning Standard]]
}}
}}

Revision as of 16:37, 30 June 2018

IR 05000333/2015502, October 19-23, 2015, James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant: NRC Evaluated Emergency Preparedness Exercise
ML15337A393
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/03/2015
From: Raymond McKinley
Plant Support Branch 1
To: Brian Sullivan
Entergy Nuclear Northeast
References
IR 2015502
Download: ML15337A393 (11)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 2100 RENAISSANCE BLVD., SUITE 100 KING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406

-2713 December 3, 2015 Mr. Brian Sullivan Site Vice President Entergy Nuclear Northeast James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant P. O. Box 110

Lycoming, NY 13093

SUBJECT:

JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT: NRC EVALUATED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE

- INSPECTION REPORT 05000333/2015502

Dear Mr. Sullivan:

On October 23, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection of the October 20, 2015, evaluated emergency preparedness exercise at your James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on October 23

, 2015, with you and other members of your staff

.

The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulation (10 CFR) 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's document system, Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).

ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading

-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,/RA/ Raymond R. Mc Kinley, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket No.: 50-333 License No.: DPR-59

Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Report No. 05000 333/2015502 cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ D. Musick, RAC Chair, FEMA Region II

Mr. Brian Sullivan Site Vice President Entergy Nuclear Northeast James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant P. O. Box 110

Lycoming, NY 13093

SUBJECT:

JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

NRC EVALUATED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE

- INSPECTION REPORT 05000333/2015502 Dear M

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

Inspection Report 05000333/2015502; 10/19 - 23/2015; James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (FitzPatrick)

Exercise Evaluation- Hostile Action (HA) Event; Exercise Evaluation- Scenario Review; Performance Indicator Verification

. This was an announced inspection conducted by four Region I-based inspectors and one headquarters-based inspector. No findings were identified during the inspection. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revisio n 5.

Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness

No findings were identified.

REPORT DETAILS

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstone:

Emergency Preparedness (EP)1EP7 Exercise Evaluation

- Hostile Action Event (71114.07 - 1 Sample)

a. Inspection Scope

Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 50

, Appendix E,Section IV.F.2.j, requires in part that nuclear power reactor licensees, in each eight calendar year exercise cycle, provide the opportunity for their emergency response organization (ERO) to demonstrate proficiency in the key skills necessary to respond to a hostile action (HA) directed at the plant site.

Entergy designed th e October 20

, 2015, FitzPatrick EP exercise to satisfy that requirement, and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (

NRC) inspected the FitzPatrick HA event exercise to assess Entergy's ability to effectively implement the FitzPatrick Emergency Plan during an HA event.

This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle.

The exercise evaluation consisted of the following review and assessment:

The adequacy of the Entergy FitzPatrick ERO's performance in the biennial full-participation exercise regarding the implementation of the risk significant planning standards (RSPS) described in 10 CFR 50.47(b

) (4), (5), (9), and (10), which are

emergency classification; offsite notification; radiological assessment
onsite protective actions

, and public protective action recommendations

, respectively.

The overall adequacy of Entergy's FitzPatrick emergency response facilities with regard to Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were

the Control Room Simulator

, the Alternative Facility

, the Central Alarm Station (CAS),

the local law enforcement Incident Command Post (ICP

), and the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF

).

A review of other performance areas, such as

the Entergy FitzPatrick ERO's: recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, including interactions with site security staff; intra- and inter

-facility communications; prioritization of mitigating activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies, including local law enforcement agencies; staffing and procedure adequacy; and the overall implementation of the FitzPatrick Emergency Plan and its implementing procedures.

A review of past performance issues from the last NRC FitzPatrick exercise inspection report and recent Entergy FitzPatrick EP drill reports, to determine the effectiveness of licensee corrective actions as demonstrated during the October 20, 2015, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).

The licensee's post

-exercise critiques, to evaluate Entergy's self-assessment of its FitzPatrick ERO performance during the October 20, 2015, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR

, Part 50, Appendix E,Section IV.F.2.g.

The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1EP8 Exercise Evaluation

- Scenario Review (71114.08 - 1 Sample)

a. Inspection Scope

Prior to the October 2 0, 2015, emergency preparedness exercise, the NRC inspectors conducted an in

-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario, which Entergy had submitted to the NRC, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the FitzPatrick Emergency Plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle

.

The inspectors reviewed the documents listed in the attachment to this report.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)

4OA1 Performance Indicator

Verification (71151 - 3 Samples)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed data for the FitzPatrick EP Performance Indicators (

PI), which are: (1) Drill and Exercise Performance (DEP)

(EP01); (2) ERO Drill Participation (EP02); and (3) Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability (EP03). The last NRC EP inspection at FitzPatrick was conducted in the third calendar quarter of 201 4, so the inspectors reviewed supporting documentation from EP drills and tests from the third calendar quarter of 201 4 through the third calendar quarter of 201 5, to verify the accuracy of the reported PI data. The review of these PIs was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, using the acceptance criteria documented in NEI 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guidelines," Revision 7

. This inspection activity represented the completion of three samples.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA6 Meetings,

including Exit On October 23, 2014, the inspectors presented the results of this inspection to Mr. B. Sullivan, FitzPatrick Site Vice President

, and other members of the Entergy staff. The inspectors verified that no proprietary information was retained by the inspectors or documented in this report

.

ATTACHMENT

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee Personnel

B. Sullivan

, FitzPatrick

Site Vice President

M. Wilson

, Entergy Emergency Planning Manager

J. Jones, FitzPatrick Emergency Planning Manager

LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED

None.

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

Section 1EP7

Exercise Evaluation

- Hostile Action (HA) Event James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Plan

IAP-2, Classification of Emergency Conditions, Revision 3
EAP-1.1, Offsite Notifications, Revision 71
EAP-14.8, Alternate TSC/OSC Activation and Operation, Revision 1
EN-EP-306, Drills and Exercises, Revision 6
EN-EP-307, Hostile Action Based Drills and Exercises, Revision 3
EN-EP-308, Emergency Planning Critiques, Revision 3
EN-EP-609, Emergency Operations Facility Operations, Revision 1
FitzPatrick Emergency Plan lmplementing Procedures FitzPatrick October 2
0, 2015, Emergency Exercise Scenario Package FitzPatrick Emergency Preparedness Drill Reports, January 201

- October 2015

JEP-15-0049, October 20, 2015, Exercise Report, dated November 6

, 2015

Section 1EP8: Exercise Evaluation

- Scenario Review James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Plan

EN-EP-306, Drills and Exercises, Revision 6
EN-EP-307, Hostile Action Based Drills and Exercises, Revision 3
FitzPatrick October 20, 2015, Emergency Exercise Scenario Package

Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator (PI) Verification

EN-FAP-EP-005, Fleet Administrative Procedure Emergency Preparedness Performance Indicators, Revision 0
EN-LI-114, Performance Indicator Process, Revision 6
ANS Reliability
PI Data, July 2014

- September 2015

DEP PI Data, July 2014 - September
2015 ERO Drill Participation PI data, July 2014

- September 2015

LIST OF ACRONYMS

ADAMS Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
ANS Alert Notification System
CAS Central Alarm Station
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DEP Drill and Exercise Performance
EOF Emergency Operations Facility
EP Emergency Preparedness
ERO Emergency Response Organization
HA Hostile Action
ICP Incident Command Post
NEI Nuclear Energy Institute
NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission
PAR Protective Action Recommendation

PI Performance Indicator

RSPS Risk Significant Planning Standard