ML19305B332: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 27: Line 27:
             'Ibe preservice inspection program for Farley Unit 2 is described in Section 5.2.8 of the FSAR. 'Ihe Unit 2 preservice inspection program was orig:Lnally based on the 1971 Edition through Winter 1971 Addenda of Section XI for ASME Code Class 1 cxmponents and the 1971 Edition through Winter 1972 addenda of Section XI for ASFE Code Class 2 crrponents. However, in con-sideration of the updating requirements of 10GR50.55a, (g), the Unit 2 preservice inspection program for Class 1 and 2 c::rponents was revised in ESAR Amendment 69 dated Ppril 28, 1978 with the intent to meet, as much as practical, the requirenents of the 1974 Edition of Section XI though Sumner 1975 Addenda. Relief frcxn the inspection regtdrenents of Section XI is requested in the ytwimu where these inspectic.. requirements have been detennined to be inpractical. hhere relief is requested, specific in-formation is provided which identifies the applicable code requirenent, justification for the relief request, ard inspection method to be used as 8o031 90636
             'Ibe preservice inspection program for Farley Unit 2 is described in Section 5.2.8 of the FSAR. 'Ihe Unit 2 preservice inspection program was orig:Lnally based on the 1971 Edition through Winter 1971 Addenda of Section XI for ASME Code Class 1 cxmponents and the 1971 Edition through Winter 1972 addenda of Section XI for ASFE Code Class 2 crrponents. However, in con-sideration of the updating requirements of 10GR50.55a, (g), the Unit 2 preservice inspection program for Class 1 and 2 c::rponents was revised in ESAR Amendment 69 dated Ppril 28, 1978 with the intent to meet, as much as practical, the requirenents of the 1974 Edition of Section XI though Sumner 1975 Addenda. Relief frcxn the inspection regtdrenents of Section XI is requested in the ytwimu where these inspectic.. requirements have been detennined to be inpractical. hhere relief is requested, specific in-formation is provided which identifies the applicable code requirenent, justification for the relief request, ard inspection method to be used as 8o031 90636


__  _ _ _ _  __ __
    .
. . . .
Docket No. 50-364 Director of Nuclear Beactor Regulaticn March 14, 1980 Page        an alternative. Preservice inspection requirements for ASME Code Class 3 Pnts are satisfied by the inspection requirements of Section III of the ASE Code.
Docket No. 50-364 Director of Nuclear Beactor Regulaticn March 14, 1980 Page        an alternative. Preservice inspection requirements for ASME Code Class 3 Pnts are satisfied by the inspection requirements of Section III of the ASE Code.
An updated inservice inspection program for thit 2 is still under development and will be subnitted to the NBC for review and approval approximately six months prior to ccxtmercial operation in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50.55a,(g) . 'Ihe informaticn contained in this subnittal will be based on the guidance provided in your letter of February 4, 1980.
An updated inservice inspection program for thit 2 is still under development and will be subnitted to the NBC for review and approval approximately six months prior to ccxtmercial operation in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50.55a,(g) . 'Ihe informaticn contained in this subnittal will be based on the guidance provided in your letter of February 4, 1980.
Line 35: Line 32:
Yours very truly, S y r n ..      -L    \
Yours very truly, S y r n ..      -L    \
F. L.gClayton, v 'CLL.L.
F. L.gClayton, v 'CLL.L.
Jr. Csf
Jr. Csf FICjr/JGS/mtb cc: Mr. R. A. 'Ihcmas Mr. G. F. Trowbridge}}
                                                                          '
                                                                  !
FICjr/JGS/mtb cc: Mr. R. A. 'Ihcmas Mr. G. F. Trowbridge}}

Latest revision as of 13:57, 1 February 2020

Responds to NRC 800204 Ltr Re Submittal of Preservice & Inservice Insp Programs for ASME Code Class 1,2 & 3 Components.Updated Inservice Insp Program Under Development & to Be Submitted Six Months Prior to Commercial Operation
ML19305B332
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 03/14/1980
From: Clayton F
ALABAMA POWER CO.
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8003190536
Download: ML19305B332 (2)
v • d • e


Text

.

Alabama Power Company '

600 North 18tn Street

- Post office Box 2641 Birmingham At:bam3 35291 Telephone 205 323-5341 l

- 1 F. L CLAYTON, JR.

Senior Vice President Alabama Power the souttwn electrc system i

March 14, 1980 Cocket No. 50-364 Direbtor of Nuclear Beactor Pegulation i U. S. Nuclear Regulatory (tmnission  !

Washirston, D. C. 20555 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant - Unit No. 2 Inspection Prcytars for ASME Code Mass 1, 2, and 3 Orpenents Gentlenen:

Your letter of February 4,1980 to Alabam, Power Ocxrpany stated that the inspection program for ASME (bde Class 1, 2, and 3 ccxuponents should be in accordance with the revised rules in 10GR50, Section 50.55a, paragraph (g). 'Ihis letter requested information concerning the preservice and inservi inspection programs and provided guidance regarding the subnittal of these prcy. .s.

'Ibe preservice inspection program for Farley Unit 2 is described in Section 5.2.8 of the FSAR. 'Ihe Unit 2 preservice inspection program was orig:Lnally based on the 1971 Edition through Winter 1971 Addenda of Section XI for ASME Code Class 1 cxmponents and the 1971 Edition through Winter 1972 addenda of Section XI for ASFE Code Class 2 crrponents. However, in con-sideration of the updating requirements of 10GR50.55a, (g), the Unit 2 preservice inspection program for Class 1 and 2 c::rponents was revised in ESAR Amendment 69 dated Ppril 28, 1978 with the intent to meet, as much as practical, the requirenents of the 1974 Edition of Section XI though Sumner 1975 Addenda. Relief frcxn the inspection regtdrenents of Section XI is requested in the ytwimu where these inspectic.. requirements have been detennined to be inpractical. hhere relief is requested, specific in-formation is provided which identifies the applicable code requirenent, justification for the relief request, ard inspection method to be used as 8o031 90636

Docket No. 50-364 Director of Nuclear Beactor Regulaticn March 14, 1980 Page an alternative. Preservice inspection requirements for ASME Code Class 3 Pnts are satisfied by the inspection requirements of Section III of the ASE Code.

An updated inservice inspection program for thit 2 is still under development and will be subnitted to the NBC for review and approval approximately six months prior to ccxtmercial operation in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50.55a,(g) . 'Ihe informaticn contained in this subnittal will be based on the guidance provided in your letter of February 4, 1980.

Should you have any questions, please advise.

Yours very truly, S y r n .. -L \

F. L.gClayton, v 'CLL.L.

Jr. Csf FICjr/JGS/mtb cc: Mr. R. A. 'Ihcmas Mr. G. F. Trowbridge

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19305B332&oldid=2374243"