|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| #REDIRECT [[IA-86-151, Testimony of Nj Palladino Before Committee on Interior & Insular Affairs,Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations on 830308,re Diablo Canyon Licensing Issues]]
| | {{Adams |
| | | number = ML20214N490 |
| | | issue date = 03/08/1983 |
| | | title = Testimony of Nj Palladino Before Committee on Interior & Insular Affairs,Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations on 830308,re Diablo Canyon Licensing Issues |
| | | author name = Palladino N |
| | | author affiliation = NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| | | addressee name = |
| | | addressee affiliation = |
| | | docket = 05000275, 05000323 |
| | | license number = |
| | | contact person = |
| | | case reference number = FOIA-86-151 |
| | | document report number = NUDOCS 8706020192 |
| | | package number = ML20213E357 |
| | | document type = LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS, TRANSCRIPTS, DEPOSITIONS, NARRATIVE TESTIMONY |
| | | page count = 11 |
| | }} |
| | |
| | =Text= |
| | {{#Wiki_filter:_. - _ _ ._. |
| | TESTIMONY |
| | ; 0F NUNZIO J. PALLADIN0 CHAIRMAN |
| | ~ U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE SUBCdMMITTEEONOVERSIGHTANDINVESTIGATIONS COMMITTEE ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ON DIABLO CANYON LICENSING CONCERNS MARCH 8, 1983 8706020192 870522 ME 6--151 PDR |
| | |
| | MR. CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE, THANK YOU FOR f |
| | THE INVIATION TO APPEAR BEFORE YOU TODAY. WE APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS WITH YOU THE ISSUES AND CONCERNS PRESENTLY SURROUNDING THE DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT. LET ME ASSURE YOU AT THE OUTSET THAT THE NRC CONSIDERS THE ERRORS 4 |
| | THAT HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED AT DIABLO CANYON TO BE QUITE SERIOUS AND WILL NOT AUTHORIZE ANY OPERATION OF THE FACILITY, INCLUDING FUEL LOADING, UNTIL AN OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE PLANT'S SAFETY HAS BEEN ADEQUATELY COMPLETED. |
| | IN ORDER THAT YOU AND THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE MAY BETTER UNDERSTAND THE ISSUES, A BRIEF DISCUSSION OF THE BACKGROUND LEADING UP TO THE QUESTION OF DIABLO CANYON UNIT 1 LOADING FUEL WOULD BE APPROPRIATE. ON SEPTEMBER 22, 1981, THE NUCLEAR REGULATOS ( COMMISSION ISSUED AN OPERATING LICENSE FOR DIABLO CANYON UNIT 1. IHAT LICENSE AUTHORIZED THE PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (PG&E) TO LOAD FUEL INTO THE REACTOR, CONDUCT COLD AND HOT FUNCTIONAL TESTING, BRING THE REACTOR TO CRITICALITY AND ALLOW POWER TESTING UP TO 5% OF RATED POWER. |
| | ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1981 THE LICENSEE INFORMED THE NRC THAT THEY HAD DISCOVERED WHAT HAS BECOME KNOWN AS THE " MIRROR IMAGE" PROBLEM. AN ARRANGEMENT DRAWING FOR UNIT 2 (WHICH IS A MIRROR-IMAGE DESIGN OF UNIT 1) WAS USED IN THE SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF EQUIPMENT MOUNTED ON THE UNIT 1 CONTAINMENT ANNULUS STEEL STRUCTURE. AT THAT TIME FUEL LOADING OPERATIONS-HAD NOT |
| | ,w,- , - ----- , , |
| | |
| | COMMENCED, AND THE LICENSEE COMMITTED TO POSTPONE LOADING FUEL UNTIL THE ADEQUACY OF THE SEISMIC DESIGN OF UNIT 1 WAS SATISFACTORILY RESOLVED. |
| | DURING THE NEXT. FEW WEEKS AN INITI AL RE-ANALYSIS BY PG&E OF PORTIONS OF THE SEISMIC DESIGN OF THE FACILITY IDENTIFIED A NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL DIFFERENT ERRORS AND QUESTIONS, AND NRC EVALUATION EFFORTS IDENTIFIED A POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT WEAKNESS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PG&E QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM WITH REGARD TO WORK PERFORMED BY SEISMIC DESIGN CONTRACTORS. |
| | AS A RESULT OF THESE FINDINGS AND CONCERNS, ON NOVEMBER 19, 1981, THENRCTOOKhWOACTIONS. |
| | FIRST, THE COMMISSION ISSUED ITS ORDER, CLI-81-30 (THE ORDER), |
| | WHICH SUSPENDED THE LOW POWER LICENSE FOR DIABLO CANYON UNIT 1 AND REQUIRED PG&E TO INSTITUTE A DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM CONCERNING' SAFETY-RELATED ACTIVITIES PERFORME UNDER SEISMIC-RELATED SERVICE CONTRACTS PRIOR TO JUNE 1978. THE PROGRAM |
| | ~ |
| | 1/ PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CCMPANY (DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT,. UNIT 1), ORDER SUSPENDING LICENSE, CLI-81-30, l 14 NRC 950, N0vEMBER 19, 1981. |
| | l 1 |
| | ) |
| | I ! |
| | |
| | T WAS TO BE CONDUCTED BY A QUALIFIED AND-INDEPENDENT COMPANY AND WAS TO INCLUDE A REVIEW OF THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND TO INCLUDE SAMPLE CALCULATIONS OF THE SEISMIC DESIGN OF SAFETY-RELATED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, AND COMPONENTS. THE ORDER ALSO PROVIDED FOR COMMENTS BY THE PARTIES TO THE DIABLO CANYON LICENSING PROCEEDING PERTAINING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROGRAM AND SELEUTION OF THE INDEPEN-DENT COMPANY. THE ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE ORDER HAVE BECOME KNOWN AS PHASE I 0F THE INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM (IDVP). |
| | SECOND, THE D5 RECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION REQUIRED PG&E TO INITIATE FURTHER INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION EFFORTS WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO A DECIS. ION REGARDING EXCEEDING 5% POWER OPERATION. THESE ADDITIONAL EFFORTS HAVE BECOME KNOWN AS PHASE lI OF THE DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM AND ARE DIRECTED TO SAFETY-RELATED ACTIVITIES PERFORMED UNDER OTHER CONTRACTS AND TO PG8E INTERNAL DESIGN ACTIVITIES. |
| | 2/ DIABLO CANYON UNIT 1 - INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAMS, LETTER FROM H. R. DENTON, DIRECTOR, 0FFICE OF |
| | ~ |
| | NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION TO M. H. FURBUSH, VICE PRESIDENT-GENERAL COUNSEL, PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, DATED NOVEMBER 19, 1981. |
| | |
| | _4-THE FUNDAMENTAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE PHASE II EFFORTS ARE THE SAME AS FOR PHASE I, NAMELY, DEVELOPMENT OF AN ACCEPTABLE PROGRAM TO BE CONDUCTED BY AN INDEPENDENT COMPANY. A MORE DETAILED OUTLINE OF THE TASKS REQUIRED TO BE INCLUDED IN PHASE I AND PHASE II IS OUTLINED IN ATTACHMENT 1. |
| | IN MARCH OF 1982,-THE LICENSEE PROPOSED THE USE OF IELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES AS THE INDEPENDENT COMPANY TO MANAGE PHASE I 0F THE IDVP WITH R. L. CLOUD ASSOC. AND R. F.-REEDY INC., AS SUBCONTRACTORS. THIS PROPOSAL, AS MODIFIED, WAS FOUND ACCEPTABLE BY THE COMMISSION AND IN APRIL 1982 THE COMMISSION APPROVED THE FORMAL PROGRAM PLAN FOR PHASE I 0F THE IDVP. THE PROPOSAL FOR THE PHASE 11 PROGRAM WAS SUBMITTED IN JUNE 1982 AND APPROVED, AS MODIFIED, BY THE COMMISSION IN DECEMBER 1982. IN ADDITION TO THE TWO PHASE I SUBCONTRACTORS, STONE AND WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORP. HAS BEEN RETAINED BY THE IDVP TO AUGMENT ITS CAPABILITY TO UNDERTAKE THE PHASE II EFFORTS. |
| | l THE SCOPE OF THE OVERALL DESIGN VERIFICATION EFFORTS-HAS BEEN - |
| | ; SIGNIFICANTLY EXPANDED SINCE NOVEMBER 1981. MOST SIGNIFICANT WAS THE DECISION BY THE LICENSEE TO UNDERTAKE A COMPREHENSIVE |
| | : INTERNAL IECHNICAL PROGRAM (ITP) DESIGNED TO VERIFY THE SEISMIC ADEQUACY OF ALL SAFETY-RELATED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS. SEVERAL OTHER REVIEWS AND AUDITS'WERE ALSO UNDER-i TAKEN BY THE LICENSEE AND HIS CONTR' ACTORS. THE MAJOR |
| | ,v-- - |
| | - - . - - - , - ~ - - |
| | -w |
| | |
| | 1 VERIFICATION EFFORT IS BEING CARRIED OUT BY AN INTEGRATED PROJECT TEAM MADE UP OF PG&E AND REPRESENTATIVES OF THE BECHTEL-POWER CORPORATION WHO IS UNDER CONTRACT TO PG&E. THE JOINT EFFORT IS COMPOSED OF BOTH PG&E AND BECHTEL PROFESSIONAL AND MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL WITH A SENIOR BECHTEL MANAGER RESPONSIBLE-FOR OVERALL PROJECT DIRECTION, REPORTING DIRECTLY TO A PG&E EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT. THIS PG&E/BECHTEL PROGRAM IS AN: |
| | UNPRECEDENTED EFFORT FOR REVERIFYING THE ADEQUACY OF A PLANT WHICH IS ALREADY BUILT. |
| | OVER THE PAST. YEAR THE NRC HAS BEEN CLOSELY FOLLOWING THE-CONTINUING EVALUATION BY BOTH THE PG8E/BECHTEL TEAM AND BY THE INDEPEND'ENT CONTRACTORS. IN ADDITION, THE STAFF HAS INITIATED A SERIES OF INDEPENDENT SEISMIC ANALYSES THAT ARE SERVING AS BENCHMARKS FOR THE REVIEW OF THE PG&E AND IDVP EFFORTS. |
| | DURING THE LATTER PART OF 1982, REVI'EW EFFORTS BY BOTH THE PG&E/BECHTEL PROGRAM AND THE IDVP PHASE I AND PHASE 11 PROGRAMS |
| | ; HAD PROCEEDED TO THE POINT THAT THE DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN THE l PRE-1978 AND POST-1978 TIME PERIODS AND BETWEEN SEISMIC AND NON-SEISMIC DESIGN ACTIVITIES AS THEY ARE ADDRESSED-IN PHASE I AND PHASE 11 0F THE DESIGN VERIFICATION EFFORT, RESPECTIVELY, COULD NO LONGER BE MADE. ACCORDINGLY, THE STAFF S'UBMITTED A PROPOSAL TO THE COMMISSION IN OCTOBER 1982-WHICH SUPPORTED A MORE INTEGRATED PHASE 1/ PHASE II' CONCEPT, SUCH THAT REINSTATE-W |
| | .v m --, n w-----, , -- ,v- , , - |
| | o |
| | |
| | . _ ~. |
| | b 6-MENT OF THE.0PERATING LICENSE WOULD REQUIRE COMPLETION OF NOT ONLY PHASE I ACTIVITIES BUT ALSO COMPLETION OF ENOUGH OF PHASE 11 TO ASSURE THAT NO MAJOR DEFICIENCY WOULD GO UNDETECTED |
| | ~ |
| | IN EARLY DECEMBER 1982 PG&E PROPOSED A PROCESS TO ACHIEVE THE~ |
| | ; SAME GOAL. AFTER CAREFUL CONSIDERATION, THE COMMISSION APPROVED A SOMEWHAT' REVISED' APPROACH IN DECEMBER 1982. THE APPROACH-CALLS FOR A CAREFUL, DELIBERATE APPROACH TOWARDS DECISIONS-REGARDING THE DIABLO CANYON FACILITY. THE APPROACH WAS DEVELOPED TO ENSURE THAT THE NRC HAS ADEQUATE CONFIDENCE THAT ALL DETECTED ERRORS HAVE BEEN THOROUGHLY EVALUATED AND RESOLVED AND TO PROVIDE CONFIDENCE THAT NO ADDITIONAL SIGNIFICANT ERRORS EXIST. THE EVALUATION APPROACH APPROVED IN DECEMBER 1982 1 |
| | IS A THREE-STEP PROCESS. |
| | : 1. A DECISION REGARDING THE LOADING OF FUEL INTO THE REACTOR VESSEL AND COLD SYSTEM TESTING, |
| | : 2. A DECISION REGARDING LOW POWER TESTING UP TO 5% |
| | POWER, AND |
| | : 3. A DECISION REGARDING THE FULL POWER LICENSE. |
| | * 1 c STEPS 1 AND 2 TOGETHER CONSTITUTE THE SCOPE OF.THE LICENSE'. |
| | ORIGINALLY ISSUED BY THE NRC IN SEPTEMBER 1981. IT IS OUR INTENT THAT THE REVIEW, EVALUATION, AND MODIFICATIONS FOR ALL j SAFETY-RELATED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, AND COMPONENTS NEEDED TO SUPPORT THE ACTIVITY IN EACH STEP WILL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO A 1 |
| | 1 |
| | ,-n ---m o , e ~ |
| | r .e we 4 .n , w--- - + - - r v we,-,, --n.--r |
| | |
| | 7 DECISION FOR THAT STEP. IN ADDITION, PRIOR TO ANY DECISION, EVEN FOR STEP 1, EVALUATIONS'FOR ALL ASPECTS OF THE VERIFICATION (PHASE I AND PHASE II) MUST HAVE BEEN SUFFICIENTLY COMPLETED TO PROVIDE THE NRC CONFIDENCE THAT NO OTHER SAFETY SIGNIFICANT ERRORS EXISTi ATTACHMENT 2 IDENTIFIES IN MORE DETAIL THE ELEMENTS OF THIS DECISION PROCESS AND OUR RECENT LETTER TO REP UDALL PROVIDES DITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THIS THREE-STEP APPROACH. |
| | PG&E/BECHTEL EVALUATION EFFORTS AND THE IDVP VERIFICATION EFFORTS ARE APPROXIMATELY TWO-THIRDS COMPLETE FOR PHASE I AND ONE-THIRD COMPLETE FOR PHASE II ACTIVITIES. THE STAFF REVIEW IS PROCEEDING AND ITS EFFORTS ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE PGaE AND IDVP SCHEDULES. |
| | AS I INDICATED IN MY RECENT LETTER AND CONSISTENT WITH OUR ORDER, BEFORE A FAVORABLE DECISION REGARDING' FUEL LOADING, ALL EVALUATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO THOSE STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND 3/ LETTER FROM N. J. PALLADINO, CHAIRMAN, U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, TO M. K. UDALL, CHAIRMAN ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS, U. 3. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, DATED FEBRUARY 17, 1983 |
| | |
| | 8-COMPONENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR STEP 1 WILL BE COMPLETED, IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY. IN ADDITION, THE ACTIVITIES TERMED PHASE 11 WILL HAVE PROCEEDED TO AN EXTENT THAT WILL ALLOW US TO REACH A CONCLUSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY ADDITIONAL DESIGN VERIFICATION THAT MIGHT BE REQUIRED AND TO - |
| | PROVIDE ASSURANCE THAT NO ADDITIONAL SIGNIFICANT ERRORS ARE LIKELY TO EXIST. |
| | IN CLOSING, LET ME AGAIN ASSURE YOU THAT WE-DO NOT FEEL RESTRICTED IN OUR.0WN REVIEW EFFORTS BY ANY SPECIFIC SCHEDULES PROPOSED BUT WILL TAKE THE TIME NECESSARY TO ASSURE OURSELVES AND THE PUBLIC THAT THERE ARE NO DEFICIENCIES THAT WOULD PREVENT SAFETY-RELATED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS FROM PERFORMING THEIR INTENDED SAFETY FUNCTIONS. |
| | 4 i |
| | y -- w- - |
| | -,p-+r-r- -- 7, - - -e#-wgr+ m m-- -+ **e-- |
| | |
| | ', *'. ATTACHMEhT 1 NRC NOVEMBER 19. 1981 REQUIREMENTS. |
| | PHASE I COMMISSION ORDER (CLI_81-30) e Suspended fuel -loading and low power testing license. |
| | e Required: |
| | : 1. Results of an IDVP for all SSR contracts prior to.6/78. |
| | See Note (i) below. |
| | PHASE II STAFF LETTER e Activities required prior to a decision regarding power levels above 5% |
| | : 2. IDVP for NSSR contracts prior to 6/78. |
| | : 3. IDVP for PGE internal QA, and IDVP for all service related contracts post 1/78. |
| | ^ |
| | 4 See Note (i)- below. |
| | NOTES: |
| | (i) |
| | ~ |
| | Items 1, 2, 3, and 4 each require: |
| | : a. A technical report of the basic cause of the errors, their significance, and their impact on facility design. |
| | : b. PGE's conclusion on effectiveness of IDVP, and |
| | : c. A schedule for modifications; including a basis for any deferred beyond a fuel .vad decision. |
| | Both Phase I and Phase II activities must be performed by a qualified. |
| | independent organization. |
| | Both Phase I and Phase II required that a Program Plan be ~ submitted for our review and approval, and Both Phase I and Phase II were necessary, but not necessarily sufficient, activities for the appropriate approvals. |
| | NOMENCLATURE: |
| | 1DVP = Independent Design Verification Prograc - |
| | SSR = Seismic Service-Related . |
| | NSSR = Non-Seismic Service _Related , |
| | a e e e |
| | |
| | . . ~,* ATTACHMENT 2. |
| | ESTIMATED SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OF ACTIVITIES REQUIRED FOR FUEL LOADING, LOW POWER TESTING AND FULL POWER OPERATION SCHEDULED COMPLETION STEP 1 ACTIVITY DATE Requirements for 1. PG&E Evaluations: |
| | Restoration of the Low Power License A. Phase I Final Report 02/83 B. Phase II Status Report. 02/83 C. As-Built Report 03/83-4 |
| | : 2. IDVP Evaluations: |
| | A. Phase I Status Report 03/83 |
| | : 8. , Phase II Status Report 03/83 C. Other Reports 03/83 |
| | ' 3. NRC Decision for Restoration of the Low Power License 03/83 STEP II Requirements for Initial , l. PG&E Evaluations: |
| | Criticality and Low Power Testing A. Phase I Final Report, Supplement 04/83 As-Built Report B. 04/83 |
| | ! 2. IDVP Evaluations: |
| | A. Phase I Final Report 04/83 B. Phase II Status Report 04/83 4 |
| | : 3. NRC Decision for Initial Criticality and Low Power Testing 05/83 STEP III Requirements for Issuance 1. PG&E Evaluations: |
| | of a Full Power License - |
| | A. Phase II Final Report' 05/83 B. As-Built Report 06/83 |
| | : 2. IDVP Evaluations: |
| | A. Phase II Final Report 06/83 B. Other Reports 06/83 |
| | : 3. NRC Decision for Issuance of a Full Power License 06/83 i |
| | s |
| | # - - 1 . -, - _ _ , *- 3 -r-- ,r.-._ . -.-.y .4 e . . - ,- e -r w --- - . _ . - - - .}} |
Testimony of Nj Palladino Before Committee on Interior & Insular Affairs,Subcommittee on Oversight & Investigations on 830308,re Diablo Canyon Licensing IssuesML20214N490 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Diablo Canyon |
---|
Issue date: |
03/08/1983 |
---|
From: |
Palladino N NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML20213E357 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
FOIA-86-151 NUDOCS 8706020192 |
Download: ML20214N490 (11) |
|
|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARDCL-99-123, Comment on Prs 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & Draft NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Guidelines. Util Areas of Concern Includes ESF Actuations, Significantly Degraded Components & Historical Limitations1999-09-20020 September 1999 Comment on Prs 10CFR50 & 72 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors & Draft NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Guidelines. Util Areas of Concern Includes ESF Actuations, Significantly Degraded Components & Historical Limitations ML20205N4081999-04-14014 April 1999 Comments Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR2,19 & 20 Re Proposed Repository at Yucca Mountain.Requests Information on How Much Radiation Being Released Now at Diablo & Hanford NPPs ML20205N4601999-03-21021 March 1999 Introduces K Schumann as Representative of Nuclear Waste Committee (Nuwic) of San Lius Obispo County.Informs That Nuwic & Nuclear Waste Management Committee Concerned with Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel Rods from Dcnpp ML20195E8841998-11-24024 November 1998 Petition for Mod to OLs to Require Plant Owner to Have Independent Contractor Evaluate Plant Safety Culture ML20236T3011998-07-24024 July 1998 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Avtivities (Effective Immediately).Lh Brooks Prohibited for 5 Yrs from Date of Order from Engaging in NRC Licensed Activities ML20248C2261998-05-22022 May 1998 Comment Opposing Revised Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Protection & Safety Sys ML20129J4191996-10-18018 October 1996 Order Approving Application Re Corporate Restructuring of Pacific Gas & Electric Company by Establishment of Holding Company DCL-95-206, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-61 Re Improving Fire Protection Regulations1995-10-0606 October 1995 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-61 Re Improving Fire Protection Regulations ML20091P8721995-08-23023 August 1995 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-61 Re Nuclear Energy Institute Proposed Amends on Fire Safety for All NPPs DCL-95-001, Comment on Proposed Changes to Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity Rule 10CFR50.Endorses NEI Comments1995-01-0303 January 1995 Comment on Proposed Changes to Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity Rule 10CFR50.Endorses NEI Comments ML20077M7521994-12-30030 December 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low Power Operation for Nuclear Power Reactors DCL-94-270, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Rulemaking for NPP License Renewal.Endorses Comments & Changes Proposed by NEI 941208 Submittal1994-12-0808 December 1994 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR2,51 & 54 Re Rulemaking for NPP License Renewal.Endorses Comments & Changes Proposed by NEI 941208 Submittal ML20149H0851994-11-0404 November 1994 Initial Decision (Construction Period Recovery/Recapture).* Renewed Motion to Reopen Record 940808,denied.Served on 941104.W/Certificate of Svc ML20072L2651994-08-23023 August 1994 PG&E Opposition to San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Renewed Motion to Reopen Record.* Util Opposes San Luis Obispo for Peace Motion Based on Affidavit Stating No Evidence Found in Motion Re Flaw in Program.W/Certificate of Svc ML20072F0291994-08-12012 August 1994 Erratum to San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Motion to Reopen Record.* Intervenors Corrects Error in Renewed Motion to Reopen Record Re Application for License Amend to Extend Term of Operating License for Plant.W/Certificate of Svc ML20072B2651994-08-0909 August 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re FFD Requirements Concerning Random Drug Testing ML20072A5821994-08-0808 August 1994 San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Renewed Motion to Reopen Record Re PG&E Application for Amend to Extend Term of OL for Plant.* Motion to Reopen Record to Introduce Insp Rept Identifying Alleged Problems W/Plant.W/Certificate of Svc ML20071L2061994-07-26026 July 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Changing Current Drug Testing Policies to Exclude All Personnel in nonsafety-related Positions ML20072B8481994-07-26026 July 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Changes to FFD Requirements Concerning Random Drug Testing ML20071L1901994-07-20020 July 1994 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Relaxing Rule on Drug Testing of Employees Working at NPP DCL-94-134, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-60 Re Amend to 10CFR50.54 by Changing Frequency W/Which Each Licensee Conducts Independent Reviews of Emergency Preparedness Program1994-06-27027 June 1994 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-60 Re Amend to 10CFR50.54 by Changing Frequency W/Which Each Licensee Conducts Independent Reviews of Emergency Preparedness Program DCL-94-135, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Proposed Amend to 10CFR50.54(p) Concerning Frequency W/Which Licensee Conducts Independent Reviews of Security Programs1994-06-27027 June 1994 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-59 Re Proposed Amend to 10CFR50.54(p) Concerning Frequency W/Which Licensee Conducts Independent Reviews of Security Programs ML20064D1791994-03-0707 March 1994 Pacific Gas and Electric Co Reply in Opposition to San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Motion to Reopen Record.* Motion to Reopen Record Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20064D1961994-03-0404 March 1994 Affidavit of Mj Angus Re Motion to Reopen Record ML20063L5721994-02-25025 February 1994 San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Re Util Application for License Amend to Extend Term of Operating License for Plant.* Advises That Record of Proceeding Should Be Reopened to Consider Insp 93-36 Re Util Surveillance of Asw Sys DCL-94-021, Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication Facilitation1994-01-26026 January 1994 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication Facilitation ML20059D2431994-01-0707 January 1994 Package of Intervenor Exhibits Consisting of Related Correspondence Not Admitted Into Evidence.Related Correspondence ML20062N0001993-12-30030 December 1993 PG&E Reply Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.* Mothers for Peace Proposed Findings & Conclusions Do Not Provide Any Supportable Rationale to Change Findings & Conclusions Previously Proposed by Pg&E.W/Certificate of Svc ML20058P3931993-12-22022 December 1993 NRC Staff Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law in Form of Initial Decision.* Certificate of Svc ML20058K7491993-12-0202 December 1993 NRC Staff Motion for Extension of Time.* Board Has Extended Filing Time for Util Until 931230.W/Certificate of Svc. Served on 931206.Granted for Board on 931203 ML20058K8771993-12-0202 December 1993 NRC Staff Motion for Extension of Time.* Requests That Board Extend Date for Staff to File Findings Until 931222. W/Certificate of Svc ML20059M5291993-11-19019 November 1993 Applicant Exhibits A-21,A-22,A-24,A-25,A-26,A-29 & A-F1, Consisting of Related Correspondence Not Admitted Into Evidence.Related Correspondence ML20058E0741993-11-19019 November 1993 San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re Licensee Application for License Amend to Extend Term of Operating License for Plant.* W/ Certificate of Svc ML20059E8931993-10-28028 October 1993 Memorandum & Order (Motion for Extension of Time).* San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace 931018 Request for two-wk Extension of Time to File Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Granted.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 931029 ML20059E8531993-10-27027 October 1993 NRC Staff Response to Board Memorandum & Order Re Extension of Time.* Staff Believes That San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Has Shown No Good Cause for Requesting Extension to File Proposed Findings of Fact.W/Certificate of Svc ML20059E8631993-10-25025 October 1993 Pacific Gas & Electric Co Response to Motion for Extension of Time.* Util Does Not Agree W/Board Assessment That Mothers for Peace Request Appears to Be Reasonable But Will Not Oppose Request.W/Certificate of Svc ML20059B2191993-10-19019 October 1993 Memorandum & Order (Responses to Motion for Extension of Time).* Board Believes Intervenor Request for Extension of Time to File Proposed Findings of Fact Appears Reasonable. W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 931019 ML20059B1071993-10-18018 October 1993 San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace Motion for Extension of Time for Filing Proposing Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.* Requests Extension of Two Wks or Until 931119 to File Proposed Findings of Fact.W/Certificate of Svc ML20057D0531993-09-23023 September 1993 Notice of Appearance.* Notice Given That Undersigned Attorney Enters Appearance in Listed Matter & Listed Info Provided.W/Certificate of Svc ML20057B0401993-09-14014 September 1993 NRC Staff Reply to PG&E Response to Staff Motion to Amend Protective Order.* NRC Staff Moves Board to Adopt Language Requested in 930817 Motion as Stated.W/Certificate of Svc ML20056G4891993-08-30030 August 1993 Pacific Gas & Electric Co Response to Motion to Amend Protective Order.* Staff Asks That Protective Order Be Clarified by Adding New Footnote to Paragraph 3 of Order. W/Certificate of Svc ML20059C7361993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-88,consisting of NRC Insp of Diablo Canyon Units 1 & 2 IR 05000275/19920161993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-137,consisting of Insp Rept Re Dockets 50-275/92-16 & 50-323/92-16,dtd 920707 IR 05000275/19930111993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-26,consisting of Re Insp Repts 50-275/93-11 & 50-323/93-11 ML20059M1381993-08-24024 August 1993 Staff Exhibit S-1,consisting of Re 920519 Enforcement Conference IR 05000275/19920131993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-140,consisting of 920416,mgt Meeting Repts 50-275/92-13 & 50-323/92-13 ML20059D0841993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-139,consisting of Insp Rept Re Dockets 50-275 & 50-323,dtd 920417 IR 05000275/19920261993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-118,consisting of Notice of Violation & Insp Rept Re Docket 50-275/92-26 & 50-323/93-26,dtd 921113 ML20059M5041993-08-24024 August 1993 Staff Exhibit S-2,consisting of Re Notice of Violation ML20059M8621993-08-24024 August 1993 Intervenor Exhibit I-MFP-35,consisting of Rept, Self- Evaluation of Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Dtd Jul 1993 1999-09-20
[Table view] Category:TRANSCRIPTS
MONTHYEARML20056F5491993-08-24024 August 1993 Transcript of 930824 Meeting Re Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2.Pp 2,025-2,295.Related Documentation Encl ML20056F3091993-08-23023 August 1993 Transcript of 930823 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,706-1,924 ML20056G1041993-08-23023 August 1993 Transcript of 930823 Meeting in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re Facility.Pp 1,925-2,024 ML20056E4561993-08-21021 August 1993 Transcript of 930821 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,498-1,705 ML20056E4591993-08-20020 August 1993 Transcript of 930820 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,266-1,497 ML20056E4661993-08-19019 August 1993 Transcript of 930819 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,053-1,265 ML20056F3721993-08-17017 August 1993 Transcript of 930817 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 569-747 ML20046C5511993-08-0202 August 1993 Testimony of Plant Addressing Contention I:Maint & Surveillance.* Exhibits Encl.Related Correspondence ML20046C5551993-08-0202 August 1993 Testimony of Plant Addressing Contention V:Thermo-Lag Compensatory Measures.* Related Correspondence ML20125E2401992-12-11011 December 1992 Transcript of 921211 Dcnpp,Units 1 & 2 Public Meeting (Construction Period Recovery) in San Luis Obispo,Ca. Pp 352-406 ML20125D5731992-12-10010 December 1992 Transcript of 921210 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2) Const Period Facility Ols,Recapture DPR-80 & DPR-82.Pp 1-217 ML20125E2591992-12-10010 December 1992 Transcript of 921210 Public Meeting (Const Period Recovery) in San Luis Obispo,Ca.Pp 218-351 ML20147B3431988-02-24024 February 1988 Transcript of ACRS 880224 Meeting in Burlingame,Ca Re Diablo Canyon Long Term Seismic Program.Pp 260-416 ML20147B3001988-02-23023 February 1988 Corrected Transcript of ACRS 880223 Meeting in Burlingame,Ca Re Diablo Canyon Long Term Seismic Program.Pp 1-259 ML20238D2351987-09-22022 September 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Cg Gray Re Storage of Radwaste at Brink of Major Earthquake Fault.Opposes Action ML20238D4721987-07-18018 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by H Hubbard Re Util Proposal to Increase Amount of Spent Fuel Storage.Proposal Supported ML20238D1181987-07-16016 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by L Martin Objecting to Storage of Waste at Facility ML20238D4831987-07-16016 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Santa Maria Valley Developers,Inc Re Proposed Reracking of Spent Fuel Pools at Plant.Plan Supported ML20238D8151987-07-14014 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by N Wilson Re Expansion of Nuclear Waste Storage Pools & Use of Fuel Racks.Plan Opposed ML20238D3071987-07-14014 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Gn Uratsu Re Util Application to Increase Spent Fuel Storage Capacity of Spent Fuel Pools at Facility.Approval Requested ML20238D8771987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by CR Stone Supporting Util Proposal for Reracking of Spent Fuel Assemblies in Storage Pools to Allow Continued Plant Operation While DOE Provides Permanent Repository for Spent Fuel ML20238D4791987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Gr Kerr Re Reracking of Spent Fuel.Rationale Discussed ML20238D4891987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by J Lauer Re Reracking of Spent Fuel Assemblies in Storage Pools.Util Proposal Supported ML20238D4501987-07-13013 July 1987 Unsigned Limited Appearance Statement Re Expansion of Waste Site at Facility.Proposed Expansion Opposed ML20238D4561987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by M Bakula Re Plan to Store Radwaste at Plant.Plan Opposed ML20238D8671987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Hs Davis Re Increase in Onsite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel.Proposal to Replace Racks Will Increase Storage Capacity to Roughly 19 Yrs ML20238D5301987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by D Carvalho Re Storage of Nuclear Waste Next to Active Earthquake Fault.Opposes Action ML20238D4341987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by G Parker Re Expansion of Spent Fuel Storage Racks Until DOE Provides Permanent Repository ML20238D1011987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by a Krause Objecting to Waste Storage at Facility ML20238D2881987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by K,B & Fuller,Objecting to Storage of More Spent Fuel Rods than Facility Designed to Handle at Unstable Geological Location ML20238D2111987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Hutchinson Re Opposition to Radwaste Storage Plans ML20238D2161987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by J Alexander Re Storage of Nuclear Wastes at Plant ML20238D1371987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by T Ernst Objecting to Storage of Waste at Facility ML20238D0071987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Dp & Wa Rhoderick Re Storage of Wastes at Plant ML20238D1251987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by L Johnson Objecting to Storage of Waste at Facility ML20238D3731987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Dk Clogston Re Storage of Radwaste at Plant in Potentially Unsafe Containers Near Fault Line ML20238D2511987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by F Richardson Opposing Storage of Radwaste at Plant ML20238D0731987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by M Jenefsky & L Morishita Opposing Permanent Waste Storage at Plant ML20238D4771987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Wl Denneen Re Storage of Nuclear Waste at Plant ML20238D2681987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Ef Andrisek Re Support of Radwaste Storage Plan for Plant ML20238D8561987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by CF Martinez Re Installation of Spent Fuel Storage Racks Used to Store Spent Fuel Until DOE Provides Permanent Repository ML20238D1571987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by MW Replogle Objecting to Plan to Permit Increase in Storage of Nuclear Matl at Plant ML20238D2801987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Hw Barbarick Re Support of Radwaste Storage Plan for Plant ML20238D8061987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by MW Replogle Re Storage of Nuclear Matl at Plant.Plan Opposed ML20238D4401987-07-0303 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by MW Warren Re Reracking of Spent Fuel Pools.No Viable Alternative Exists Until DOE Provides Permanent Repository ML20238D8271987-07-0202 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by L Hobson Re Plant Reracking Proposal.Plan Supported ML20238D8211987-06-30030 June 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Rs Jolivette Re Reracking of Plant Spent Fuel Pools.Plan Supported ML20238D2991987-06-30030 June 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by B Griffin Re Dissatisfaction W/Proposed Storage of Radwaste at Plant ML20238D1361987-06-29029 June 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by T Ernst Re Expanded Fuel Storage at Plant 1993-08-24
[Table view] Category:DEPOSITIONS
MONTHYEARML20056F5491993-08-24024 August 1993 Transcript of 930824 Meeting Re Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2.Pp 2,025-2,295.Related Documentation Encl ML20056F3091993-08-23023 August 1993 Transcript of 930823 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,706-1,924 ML20056G1041993-08-23023 August 1993 Transcript of 930823 Meeting in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re Facility.Pp 1,925-2,024 ML20056E4561993-08-21021 August 1993 Transcript of 930821 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,498-1,705 ML20056E4591993-08-20020 August 1993 Transcript of 930820 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,266-1,497 ML20056E4661993-08-19019 August 1993 Transcript of 930819 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,053-1,265 ML20056F3721993-08-17017 August 1993 Transcript of 930817 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 569-747 ML20046C5511993-08-0202 August 1993 Testimony of Plant Addressing Contention I:Maint & Surveillance.* Exhibits Encl.Related Correspondence ML20046C5551993-08-0202 August 1993 Testimony of Plant Addressing Contention V:Thermo-Lag Compensatory Measures.* Related Correspondence ML20125E2401992-12-11011 December 1992 Transcript of 921211 Dcnpp,Units 1 & 2 Public Meeting (Construction Period Recovery) in San Luis Obispo,Ca. Pp 352-406 ML20125D5731992-12-10010 December 1992 Transcript of 921210 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2) Const Period Facility Ols,Recapture DPR-80 & DPR-82.Pp 1-217 ML20125E2591992-12-10010 December 1992 Transcript of 921210 Public Meeting (Const Period Recovery) in San Luis Obispo,Ca.Pp 218-351 ML20147B3431988-02-24024 February 1988 Transcript of ACRS 880224 Meeting in Burlingame,Ca Re Diablo Canyon Long Term Seismic Program.Pp 260-416 ML20147B3001988-02-23023 February 1988 Corrected Transcript of ACRS 880223 Meeting in Burlingame,Ca Re Diablo Canyon Long Term Seismic Program.Pp 1-259 ML20238D2351987-09-22022 September 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Cg Gray Re Storage of Radwaste at Brink of Major Earthquake Fault.Opposes Action ML20238D4721987-07-18018 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by H Hubbard Re Util Proposal to Increase Amount of Spent Fuel Storage.Proposal Supported ML20238D1181987-07-16016 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by L Martin Objecting to Storage of Waste at Facility ML20238D4831987-07-16016 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Santa Maria Valley Developers,Inc Re Proposed Reracking of Spent Fuel Pools at Plant.Plan Supported ML20238D8151987-07-14014 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by N Wilson Re Expansion of Nuclear Waste Storage Pools & Use of Fuel Racks.Plan Opposed ML20238D3071987-07-14014 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Gn Uratsu Re Util Application to Increase Spent Fuel Storage Capacity of Spent Fuel Pools at Facility.Approval Requested ML20238D8771987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by CR Stone Supporting Util Proposal for Reracking of Spent Fuel Assemblies in Storage Pools to Allow Continued Plant Operation While DOE Provides Permanent Repository for Spent Fuel ML20238D4791987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Gr Kerr Re Reracking of Spent Fuel.Rationale Discussed ML20238D4891987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by J Lauer Re Reracking of Spent Fuel Assemblies in Storage Pools.Util Proposal Supported ML20238D4501987-07-13013 July 1987 Unsigned Limited Appearance Statement Re Expansion of Waste Site at Facility.Proposed Expansion Opposed ML20238D4561987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by M Bakula Re Plan to Store Radwaste at Plant.Plan Opposed ML20238D8671987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Hs Davis Re Increase in Onsite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel.Proposal to Replace Racks Will Increase Storage Capacity to Roughly 19 Yrs ML20238D5301987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by D Carvalho Re Storage of Nuclear Waste Next to Active Earthquake Fault.Opposes Action ML20238D4341987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by G Parker Re Expansion of Spent Fuel Storage Racks Until DOE Provides Permanent Repository ML20238D1011987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by a Krause Objecting to Waste Storage at Facility ML20238D2881987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by K,B & Fuller,Objecting to Storage of More Spent Fuel Rods than Facility Designed to Handle at Unstable Geological Location ML20238D2111987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Hutchinson Re Opposition to Radwaste Storage Plans ML20238D2161987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by J Alexander Re Storage of Nuclear Wastes at Plant ML20238D1371987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by T Ernst Objecting to Storage of Waste at Facility ML20238D0071987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Dp & Wa Rhoderick Re Storage of Wastes at Plant ML20238D1251987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by L Johnson Objecting to Storage of Waste at Facility ML20238D3731987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Dk Clogston Re Storage of Radwaste at Plant in Potentially Unsafe Containers Near Fault Line ML20238D2511987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by F Richardson Opposing Storage of Radwaste at Plant ML20238D0731987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by M Jenefsky & L Morishita Opposing Permanent Waste Storage at Plant ML20238D4771987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Wl Denneen Re Storage of Nuclear Waste at Plant ML20238D2681987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Ef Andrisek Re Support of Radwaste Storage Plan for Plant ML20238D8561987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by CF Martinez Re Installation of Spent Fuel Storage Racks Used to Store Spent Fuel Until DOE Provides Permanent Repository ML20238D1571987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by MW Replogle Objecting to Plan to Permit Increase in Storage of Nuclear Matl at Plant ML20238D2801987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Hw Barbarick Re Support of Radwaste Storage Plan for Plant ML20238D8061987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by MW Replogle Re Storage of Nuclear Matl at Plant.Plan Opposed ML20238D4401987-07-0303 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by MW Warren Re Reracking of Spent Fuel Pools.No Viable Alternative Exists Until DOE Provides Permanent Repository ML20238D8271987-07-0202 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by L Hobson Re Plant Reracking Proposal.Plan Supported ML20238D8211987-06-30030 June 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Rs Jolivette Re Reracking of Plant Spent Fuel Pools.Plan Supported ML20238D2991987-06-30030 June 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by B Griffin Re Dissatisfaction W/Proposed Storage of Radwaste at Plant ML20238D1361987-06-29029 June 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by T Ernst Re Expanded Fuel Storage at Plant 1993-08-24
[Table view] Category:NARRATIVE TESTIMONY
MONTHYEARML20056F5491993-08-24024 August 1993 Transcript of 930824 Meeting Re Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2.Pp 2,025-2,295.Related Documentation Encl ML20056F3091993-08-23023 August 1993 Transcript of 930823 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,706-1,924 ML20056G1041993-08-23023 August 1993 Transcript of 930823 Meeting in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re Facility.Pp 1,925-2,024 ML20056E4561993-08-21021 August 1993 Transcript of 930821 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,498-1,705 ML20056E4591993-08-20020 August 1993 Transcript of 930820 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,266-1,497 ML20056E4661993-08-19019 August 1993 Transcript of 930819 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 1,053-1,265 ML20056F3721993-08-17017 August 1993 Transcript of 930817 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2).Pp 569-747 ML20046C5511993-08-0202 August 1993 Testimony of Plant Addressing Contention I:Maint & Surveillance.* Exhibits Encl.Related Correspondence ML20046C5551993-08-0202 August 1993 Testimony of Plant Addressing Contention V:Thermo-Lag Compensatory Measures.* Related Correspondence ML20125E2401992-12-11011 December 1992 Transcript of 921211 Dcnpp,Units 1 & 2 Public Meeting (Construction Period Recovery) in San Luis Obispo,Ca. Pp 352-406 ML20125D5731992-12-10010 December 1992 Transcript of 921210 Proceedings in San Luis Obispo,Ca Re PG&E (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant,Units 1 & 2) Const Period Facility Ols,Recapture DPR-80 & DPR-82.Pp 1-217 ML20125E2591992-12-10010 December 1992 Transcript of 921210 Public Meeting (Const Period Recovery) in San Luis Obispo,Ca.Pp 218-351 ML20147B3431988-02-24024 February 1988 Transcript of ACRS 880224 Meeting in Burlingame,Ca Re Diablo Canyon Long Term Seismic Program.Pp 260-416 ML20147B3001988-02-23023 February 1988 Corrected Transcript of ACRS 880223 Meeting in Burlingame,Ca Re Diablo Canyon Long Term Seismic Program.Pp 1-259 ML20238D2351987-09-22022 September 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Cg Gray Re Storage of Radwaste at Brink of Major Earthquake Fault.Opposes Action ML20238D4721987-07-18018 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by H Hubbard Re Util Proposal to Increase Amount of Spent Fuel Storage.Proposal Supported ML20238D1181987-07-16016 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by L Martin Objecting to Storage of Waste at Facility ML20238D4831987-07-16016 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Santa Maria Valley Developers,Inc Re Proposed Reracking of Spent Fuel Pools at Plant.Plan Supported ML20238D8151987-07-14014 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by N Wilson Re Expansion of Nuclear Waste Storage Pools & Use of Fuel Racks.Plan Opposed ML20238D3071987-07-14014 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Gn Uratsu Re Util Application to Increase Spent Fuel Storage Capacity of Spent Fuel Pools at Facility.Approval Requested ML20238D8771987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by CR Stone Supporting Util Proposal for Reracking of Spent Fuel Assemblies in Storage Pools to Allow Continued Plant Operation While DOE Provides Permanent Repository for Spent Fuel ML20238D4791987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Gr Kerr Re Reracking of Spent Fuel.Rationale Discussed ML20238D4891987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by J Lauer Re Reracking of Spent Fuel Assemblies in Storage Pools.Util Proposal Supported ML20238D4501987-07-13013 July 1987 Unsigned Limited Appearance Statement Re Expansion of Waste Site at Facility.Proposed Expansion Opposed ML20238D4561987-07-13013 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by M Bakula Re Plan to Store Radwaste at Plant.Plan Opposed ML20238D8671987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Hs Davis Re Increase in Onsite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel.Proposal to Replace Racks Will Increase Storage Capacity to Roughly 19 Yrs ML20238D5301987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by D Carvalho Re Storage of Nuclear Waste Next to Active Earthquake Fault.Opposes Action ML20238D4341987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by G Parker Re Expansion of Spent Fuel Storage Racks Until DOE Provides Permanent Repository ML20238D1011987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by a Krause Objecting to Waste Storage at Facility ML20238D2881987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by K,B & Fuller,Objecting to Storage of More Spent Fuel Rods than Facility Designed to Handle at Unstable Geological Location ML20238D2111987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Hutchinson Re Opposition to Radwaste Storage Plans ML20238D2161987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by J Alexander Re Storage of Nuclear Wastes at Plant ML20238D1371987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by T Ernst Objecting to Storage of Waste at Facility ML20238D0071987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Dp & Wa Rhoderick Re Storage of Wastes at Plant ML20238D1251987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by L Johnson Objecting to Storage of Waste at Facility ML20238D3731987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Dk Clogston Re Storage of Radwaste at Plant in Potentially Unsafe Containers Near Fault Line ML20238D2511987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by F Richardson Opposing Storage of Radwaste at Plant ML20238D0731987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by M Jenefsky & L Morishita Opposing Permanent Waste Storage at Plant ML20238D4771987-07-10010 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Wl Denneen Re Storage of Nuclear Waste at Plant ML20238D2681987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Ef Andrisek Re Support of Radwaste Storage Plan for Plant ML20238D8561987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by CF Martinez Re Installation of Spent Fuel Storage Racks Used to Store Spent Fuel Until DOE Provides Permanent Repository ML20238D1571987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by MW Replogle Objecting to Plan to Permit Increase in Storage of Nuclear Matl at Plant ML20238D2801987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Hw Barbarick Re Support of Radwaste Storage Plan for Plant ML20238D8061987-07-0606 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by MW Replogle Re Storage of Nuclear Matl at Plant.Plan Opposed ML20238D4401987-07-0303 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by MW Warren Re Reracking of Spent Fuel Pools.No Viable Alternative Exists Until DOE Provides Permanent Repository ML20238D8271987-07-0202 July 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by L Hobson Re Plant Reracking Proposal.Plan Supported ML20238D8211987-06-30030 June 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by Rs Jolivette Re Reracking of Plant Spent Fuel Pools.Plan Supported ML20238D2991987-06-30030 June 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by B Griffin Re Dissatisfaction W/Proposed Storage of Radwaste at Plant ML20238D1361987-06-29029 June 1987 Limited Appearance Statement by T Ernst Re Expanded Fuel Storage at Plant 1993-08-24
[Table view] |
Text
_. - _ _ ._.
TESTIMONY
- 0F NUNZIO J. PALLADIN0 CHAIRMAN
~ U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE SUBCdMMITTEEONOVERSIGHTANDINVESTIGATIONS COMMITTEE ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ON DIABLO CANYON LICENSING CONCERNS MARCH 8, 1983 8706020192 870522 ME 6--151 PDR
MR. CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE, THANK YOU FOR f
THE INVIATION TO APPEAR BEFORE YOU TODAY. WE APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS WITH YOU THE ISSUES AND CONCERNS PRESENTLY SURROUNDING THE DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT. LET ME ASSURE YOU AT THE OUTSET THAT THE NRC CONSIDERS THE ERRORS 4
THAT HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED AT DIABLO CANYON TO BE QUITE SERIOUS AND WILL NOT AUTHORIZE ANY OPERATION OF THE FACILITY, INCLUDING FUEL LOADING, UNTIL AN OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE PLANT'S SAFETY HAS BEEN ADEQUATELY COMPLETED.
IN ORDER THAT YOU AND THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE MAY BETTER UNDERSTAND THE ISSUES, A BRIEF DISCUSSION OF THE BACKGROUND LEADING UP TO THE QUESTION OF DIABLO CANYON UNIT 1 LOADING FUEL WOULD BE APPROPRIATE. ON SEPTEMBER 22, 1981, THE NUCLEAR REGULATOS ( COMMISSION ISSUED AN OPERATING LICENSE FOR DIABLO CANYON UNIT 1. IHAT LICENSE AUTHORIZED THE PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY (PG&E) TO LOAD FUEL INTO THE REACTOR, CONDUCT COLD AND HOT FUNCTIONAL TESTING, BRING THE REACTOR TO CRITICALITY AND ALLOW POWER TESTING UP TO 5% OF RATED POWER.
ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1981 THE LICENSEE INFORMED THE NRC THAT THEY HAD DISCOVERED WHAT HAS BECOME KNOWN AS THE " MIRROR IMAGE" PROBLEM. AN ARRANGEMENT DRAWING FOR UNIT 2 (WHICH IS A MIRROR-IMAGE DESIGN OF UNIT 1) WAS USED IN THE SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF EQUIPMENT MOUNTED ON THE UNIT 1 CONTAINMENT ANNULUS STEEL STRUCTURE. AT THAT TIME FUEL LOADING OPERATIONS-HAD NOT
,w,- , - ----- , ,
COMMENCED, AND THE LICENSEE COMMITTED TO POSTPONE LOADING FUEL UNTIL THE ADEQUACY OF THE SEISMIC DESIGN OF UNIT 1 WAS SATISFACTORILY RESOLVED.
DURING THE NEXT. FEW WEEKS AN INITI AL RE-ANALYSIS BY PG&E OF PORTIONS OF THE SEISMIC DESIGN OF THE FACILITY IDENTIFIED A NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL DIFFERENT ERRORS AND QUESTIONS, AND NRC EVALUATION EFFORTS IDENTIFIED A POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT WEAKNESS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PG&E QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM WITH REGARD TO WORK PERFORMED BY SEISMIC DESIGN CONTRACTORS.
AS A RESULT OF THESE FINDINGS AND CONCERNS, ON NOVEMBER 19, 1981, THENRCTOOKhWOACTIONS.
FIRST, THE COMMISSION ISSUED ITS ORDER, CLI-81-30 (THE ORDER),
WHICH SUSPENDED THE LOW POWER LICENSE FOR DIABLO CANYON UNIT 1 AND REQUIRED PG&E TO INSTITUTE A DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM CONCERNING' SAFETY-RELATED ACTIVITIES PERFORME UNDER SEISMIC-RELATED SERVICE CONTRACTS PRIOR TO JUNE 1978. THE PROGRAM
~
1/ PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC CCMPANY (DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT,. UNIT 1), ORDER SUSPENDING LICENSE, CLI-81-30, l 14 NRC 950, N0vEMBER 19, 1981.
l 1
)
I !
T WAS TO BE CONDUCTED BY A QUALIFIED AND-INDEPENDENT COMPANY AND WAS TO INCLUDE A REVIEW OF THE QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND TO INCLUDE SAMPLE CALCULATIONS OF THE SEISMIC DESIGN OF SAFETY-RELATED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, AND COMPONENTS. THE ORDER ALSO PROVIDED FOR COMMENTS BY THE PARTIES TO THE DIABLO CANYON LICENSING PROCEEDING PERTAINING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROGRAM AND SELEUTION OF THE INDEPEN-DENT COMPANY. THE ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE ORDER HAVE BECOME KNOWN AS PHASE I 0F THE INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM (IDVP).
SECOND, THE D5 RECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION REQUIRED PG&E TO INITIATE FURTHER INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION EFFORTS WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO A DECIS. ION REGARDING EXCEEDING 5% POWER OPERATION. THESE ADDITIONAL EFFORTS HAVE BECOME KNOWN AS PHASE lI OF THE DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM AND ARE DIRECTED TO SAFETY-RELATED ACTIVITIES PERFORMED UNDER OTHER CONTRACTS AND TO PG8E INTERNAL DESIGN ACTIVITIES.
2/ DIABLO CANYON UNIT 1 - INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAMS, LETTER FROM H. R. DENTON, DIRECTOR, 0FFICE OF
~
NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION TO M. H. FURBUSH, VICE PRESIDENT-GENERAL COUNSEL, PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, DATED NOVEMBER 19, 1981.
_4-THE FUNDAMENTAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE PHASE II EFFORTS ARE THE SAME AS FOR PHASE I, NAMELY, DEVELOPMENT OF AN ACCEPTABLE PROGRAM TO BE CONDUCTED BY AN INDEPENDENT COMPANY. A MORE DETAILED OUTLINE OF THE TASKS REQUIRED TO BE INCLUDED IN PHASE I AND PHASE II IS OUTLINED IN ATTACHMENT 1.
IN MARCH OF 1982,-THE LICENSEE PROPOSED THE USE OF IELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES AS THE INDEPENDENT COMPANY TO MANAGE PHASE I 0F THE IDVP WITH R. L. CLOUD ASSOC. AND R. F.-REEDY INC., AS SUBCONTRACTORS. THIS PROPOSAL, AS MODIFIED, WAS FOUND ACCEPTABLE BY THE COMMISSION AND IN APRIL 1982 THE COMMISSION APPROVED THE FORMAL PROGRAM PLAN FOR PHASE I 0F THE IDVP. THE PROPOSAL FOR THE PHASE 11 PROGRAM WAS SUBMITTED IN JUNE 1982 AND APPROVED, AS MODIFIED, BY THE COMMISSION IN DECEMBER 1982. IN ADDITION TO THE TWO PHASE I SUBCONTRACTORS, STONE AND WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORP. HAS BEEN RETAINED BY THE IDVP TO AUGMENT ITS CAPABILITY TO UNDERTAKE THE PHASE II EFFORTS.
l THE SCOPE OF THE OVERALL DESIGN VERIFICATION EFFORTS-HAS BEEN -
- SIGNIFICANTLY EXPANDED SINCE NOVEMBER 1981. MOST SIGNIFICANT WAS THE DECISION BY THE LICENSEE TO UNDERTAKE A COMPREHENSIVE
- INTERNAL IECHNICAL PROGRAM (ITP) DESIGNED TO VERIFY THE SEISMIC ADEQUACY OF ALL SAFETY-RELATED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS. SEVERAL OTHER REVIEWS AND AUDITS'WERE ALSO UNDER-i TAKEN BY THE LICENSEE AND HIS CONTR' ACTORS. THE MAJOR
,v-- -
- - . - - - , - ~ - -
-w
1 VERIFICATION EFFORT IS BEING CARRIED OUT BY AN INTEGRATED PROJECT TEAM MADE UP OF PG&E AND REPRESENTATIVES OF THE BECHTEL-POWER CORPORATION WHO IS UNDER CONTRACT TO PG&E. THE JOINT EFFORT IS COMPOSED OF BOTH PG&E AND BECHTEL PROFESSIONAL AND MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL WITH A SENIOR BECHTEL MANAGER RESPONSIBLE-FOR OVERALL PROJECT DIRECTION, REPORTING DIRECTLY TO A PG&E EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT. THIS PG&E/BECHTEL PROGRAM IS AN:
UNPRECEDENTED EFFORT FOR REVERIFYING THE ADEQUACY OF A PLANT WHICH IS ALREADY BUILT.
OVER THE PAST. YEAR THE NRC HAS BEEN CLOSELY FOLLOWING THE-CONTINUING EVALUATION BY BOTH THE PG8E/BECHTEL TEAM AND BY THE INDEPEND'ENT CONTRACTORS. IN ADDITION, THE STAFF HAS INITIATED A SERIES OF INDEPENDENT SEISMIC ANALYSES THAT ARE SERVING AS BENCHMARKS FOR THE REVIEW OF THE PG&E AND IDVP EFFORTS.
DURING THE LATTER PART OF 1982, REVI'EW EFFORTS BY BOTH THE PG&E/BECHTEL PROGRAM AND THE IDVP PHASE I AND PHASE 11 PROGRAMS
- HAD PROCEEDED TO THE POINT THAT THE DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN THE l PRE-1978 AND POST-1978 TIME PERIODS AND BETWEEN SEISMIC AND NON-SEISMIC DESIGN ACTIVITIES AS THEY ARE ADDRESSED-IN PHASE I AND PHASE 11 0F THE DESIGN VERIFICATION EFFORT, RESPECTIVELY, COULD NO LONGER BE MADE. ACCORDINGLY, THE STAFF S'UBMITTED A PROPOSAL TO THE COMMISSION IN OCTOBER 1982-WHICH SUPPORTED A MORE INTEGRATED PHASE 1/ PHASE II' CONCEPT, SUCH THAT REINSTATE-W
.v m --, n w-----, , -- ,v- , , -
o
. _ ~.
b 6-MENT OF THE.0PERATING LICENSE WOULD REQUIRE COMPLETION OF NOT ONLY PHASE I ACTIVITIES BUT ALSO COMPLETION OF ENOUGH OF PHASE 11 TO ASSURE THAT NO MAJOR DEFICIENCY WOULD GO UNDETECTED
~
IN EARLY DECEMBER 1982 PG&E PROPOSED A PROCESS TO ACHIEVE THE~
- SAME GOAL. AFTER CAREFUL CONSIDERATION, THE COMMISSION APPROVED A SOMEWHAT' REVISED' APPROACH IN DECEMBER 1982. THE APPROACH-CALLS FOR A CAREFUL, DELIBERATE APPROACH TOWARDS DECISIONS-REGARDING THE DIABLO CANYON FACILITY. THE APPROACH WAS DEVELOPED TO ENSURE THAT THE NRC HAS ADEQUATE CONFIDENCE THAT ALL DETECTED ERRORS HAVE BEEN THOROUGHLY EVALUATED AND RESOLVED AND TO PROVIDE CONFIDENCE THAT NO ADDITIONAL SIGNIFICANT ERRORS EXIST. THE EVALUATION APPROACH APPROVED IN DECEMBER 1982 1
IS A THREE-STEP PROCESS.
- 1. A DECISION REGARDING THE LOADING OF FUEL INTO THE REACTOR VESSEL AND COLD SYSTEM TESTING,
- 2. A DECISION REGARDING LOW POWER TESTING UP TO 5%
POWER, AND
- 3. A DECISION REGARDING THE FULL POWER LICENSE.
- 1 c STEPS 1 AND 2 TOGETHER CONSTITUTE THE SCOPE OF.THE LICENSE'.
ORIGINALLY ISSUED BY THE NRC IN SEPTEMBER 1981. IT IS OUR INTENT THAT THE REVIEW, EVALUATION, AND MODIFICATIONS FOR ALL j SAFETY-RELATED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS, AND COMPONENTS NEEDED TO SUPPORT THE ACTIVITY IN EACH STEP WILL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO A 1
1
,-n ---m o , e ~
r .e we 4 .n , w--- - + - - r v we,-,, --n.--r
7 DECISION FOR THAT STEP. IN ADDITION, PRIOR TO ANY DECISION, EVEN FOR STEP 1, EVALUATIONS'FOR ALL ASPECTS OF THE VERIFICATION (PHASE I AND PHASE II) MUST HAVE BEEN SUFFICIENTLY COMPLETED TO PROVIDE THE NRC CONFIDENCE THAT NO OTHER SAFETY SIGNIFICANT ERRORS EXISTi ATTACHMENT 2 IDENTIFIES IN MORE DETAIL THE ELEMENTS OF THIS DECISION PROCESS AND OUR RECENT LETTER TO REP UDALL PROVIDES DITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THIS THREE-STEP APPROACH.
PG&E/BECHTEL EVALUATION EFFORTS AND THE IDVP VERIFICATION EFFORTS ARE APPROXIMATELY TWO-THIRDS COMPLETE FOR PHASE I AND ONE-THIRD COMPLETE FOR PHASE II ACTIVITIES. THE STAFF REVIEW IS PROCEEDING AND ITS EFFORTS ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE PGaE AND IDVP SCHEDULES.
AS I INDICATED IN MY RECENT LETTER AND CONSISTENT WITH OUR ORDER, BEFORE A FAVORABLE DECISION REGARDING' FUEL LOADING, ALL EVALUATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS TO THOSE STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND 3/ LETTER FROM N. J. PALLADINO, CHAIRMAN, U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, TO M. K. UDALL, CHAIRMAN ON INTERIOR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS, U. 3. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, DATED FEBRUARY 17, 1983
8-COMPONENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR STEP 1 WILL BE COMPLETED, IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY. IN ADDITION, THE ACTIVITIES TERMED PHASE 11 WILL HAVE PROCEEDED TO AN EXTENT THAT WILL ALLOW US TO REACH A CONCLUSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY ADDITIONAL DESIGN VERIFICATION THAT MIGHT BE REQUIRED AND TO -
PROVIDE ASSURANCE THAT NO ADDITIONAL SIGNIFICANT ERRORS ARE LIKELY TO EXIST.
IN CLOSING, LET ME AGAIN ASSURE YOU THAT WE-DO NOT FEEL RESTRICTED IN OUR.0WN REVIEW EFFORTS BY ANY SPECIFIC SCHEDULES PROPOSED BUT WILL TAKE THE TIME NECESSARY TO ASSURE OURSELVES AND THE PUBLIC THAT THERE ARE NO DEFICIENCIES THAT WOULD PREVENT SAFETY-RELATED STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS FROM PERFORMING THEIR INTENDED SAFETY FUNCTIONS.
4 i
y -- w- -
-,p-+r-r- -- 7, - - -e#-wgr+ m m-- -+ **e--
', *'. ATTACHMEhT 1 NRC NOVEMBER 19. 1981 REQUIREMENTS.
PHASE I COMMISSION ORDER (CLI_81-30) e Suspended fuel -loading and low power testing license.
e Required:
- 1. Results of an IDVP for all SSR contracts prior to.6/78.
See Note (i) below.
PHASE II STAFF LETTER e Activities required prior to a decision regarding power levels above 5%
- 2. IDVP for NSSR contracts prior to 6/78.
- 3. IDVP for PGE internal QA, and IDVP for all service related contracts post 1/78.
^
4 See Note (i)- below.
NOTES:
(i)
~
Items 1, 2, 3, and 4 each require:
- a. A technical report of the basic cause of the errors, their significance, and their impact on facility design.
- b. PGE's conclusion on effectiveness of IDVP, and
- c. A schedule for modifications; including a basis for any deferred beyond a fuel .vad decision.
Both Phase I and Phase II activities must be performed by a qualified.
independent organization.
Both Phase I and Phase II required that a Program Plan be ~ submitted for our review and approval, and Both Phase I and Phase II were necessary, but not necessarily sufficient, activities for the appropriate approvals.
NOMENCLATURE:
1DVP = Independent Design Verification Prograc -
SSR = Seismic Service-Related .
NSSR = Non-Seismic Service _Related ,
a e e e
. . ~,* ATTACHMENT 2.
ESTIMATED SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OF ACTIVITIES REQUIRED FOR FUEL LOADING, LOW POWER TESTING AND FULL POWER OPERATION SCHEDULED COMPLETION STEP 1 ACTIVITY DATE Requirements for 1. PG&E Evaluations:
Restoration of the Low Power License A. Phase I Final Report 02/83 B. Phase II Status Report. 02/83 C. As-Built Report 03/83-4
- 2. IDVP Evaluations:
A. Phase I Status Report 03/83
- 8. , Phase II Status Report 03/83 C. Other Reports 03/83
' 3. NRC Decision for Restoration of the Low Power License 03/83 STEP II Requirements for Initial , l. PG&E Evaluations:
Criticality and Low Power Testing A. Phase I Final Report, Supplement 04/83 As-Built Report B. 04/83
! 2. IDVP Evaluations:
A. Phase I Final Report 04/83 B. Phase II Status Report 04/83 4
- 3. NRC Decision for Initial Criticality and Low Power Testing 05/83 STEP III Requirements for Issuance 1. PG&E Evaluations:
of a Full Power License -
A. Phase II Final Report' 05/83 B. As-Built Report 06/83
- 2. IDVP Evaluations:
A. Phase II Final Report 06/83 B. Other Reports 06/83
- 3. NRC Decision for Issuance of a Full Power License 06/83 i
s
- - - 1 . -, - _ _ , *- 3 -r-- ,r.-._ . -.-.y .4 e . . - ,- e -r w --- - . _ . - - - .