ML20214K509
| ML20214K509 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 11/16/1982 |
| From: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Ahearne, Gilinsky, Palladino NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20213E357 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-86-151, TASK-AS, TASK-BN82-119 BN-82-119, NUDOCS 8705280467 | |
| Download: ML20214K509 (44) | |
Text
N s
15-
- )
NOV 161982 Docket No.: 50-275 i
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chairman Palladino Commissioner Gilinsky i
Commissioner Ahearne Commissioner Roberts Connissioner Asselstine FROM:
Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
INFORMATION ITEMS REGARDING THE DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM - PHASE I FOR DIABLO CANYON, UNIT 1 (Board Notification No.82-119)
In accordance with present NRC procedures for Board Notifications, the following items are enclosed for information of the Commission.
1.
R. F. Reedy, Inc., ITR 9 - Development of the Service - Related Contractor List for Non-Seismic Design Work Performed for DCNNP-1 Prior to June 1, 1978, dated October 15, 1982.
2.
R. L. Cloud Associates, Inc., ITR 10 - Verification of Desian Analysis Hosgri Spectra, dated October 19, 1982.
3.
Teledyne Engineering Services, ITR 11 - Pacific Gas & Electric -
Westinghouse Seismic Interface Review, dated November 3, 1932.
4.
R. L. Cloud Associates, Inc., ITR 12 - Piping, dated November 5, 1982.
5.
R. L. Cloud Associates, Inc., ITR 13 - Soils - Intake Structure, dated November 5, 1982.
The enclosures provide information on the status of activities performed under the Independent Design Verification Program (IDVP) for Diablo Canyon Unit 1 by the participating organizations and under the Internal Technical Program (ITP) by PG&E. The information is relevant to the safety issue on the design adequacy of Diablo Canyon Unit 1.
This is the subject of Conniasion Order CLI-81-30 which is the basis for the IDVP.
Contact:
Hans Schierling, ONRR
'N X27243 s
-_ __.. j sun wn)]:..
8705280467 8'70522
,k~
PDR FOIA HOLMES86-151 PDR w o;.
+
- r-2-
2 7 7 ' ] ' ?.,O,fC77 3
- ]O-
~~
'S ;
W h
I The Comission The material does not pertain.to those matters that were resolved by ALAB 644.
Oric -'; n -:c y
- u. ~., ; >
Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosures:
j As stated cc w/encls:
ASLB i
ASLBP 5ECY OGC OPE Board Service List Distribution:
See attached sheet Uk:I 3
9)
,,DLyD)(f':DL:DI,R
- res 3.0Lj LB#3.,,.. DL -
p HSchierling:p K hon T,,
I.No9ak DEisenhut sau..isr!11/./82,l,11, Q,,/.82.. l..ll/..l.M82.. ;-.11/. *,
./82.. i
.i....
.i.
.ma >
- 7-c:/
7 z 00 e. ; c ? =-
r.
1 Document Management Branch BOARD NOTIFICATION ggggmggg,Cggtgg}gegk 3
BN No.82-119
- w/ enclosure i
NRC PQR*
L PDR*
TERA
- NSIC*
LB#3 Reading
- G. Knighton*
~~ ' ' ' ~
2' Project Manager
- H. Schierling J. Lee T. M. Novak L. Berry D. Eisenhut/R. Purple M. Williams H. Denton/E. Case
- PPAS J. Youngblood A. Schwencer E. Adensam C. Thomas R. Vollmer H. Thompson R. Mattson S. Hanauer Attorney, OELD*
E. L. Jordon J. M. Taylor Regional Adminstrator Resident Inspector W. J. Dircks, ED0 (3)
E. Christenbury, OELD J. Scinto, OELD 4
A. Bennette*
S. Black cc: Board Service List
e
.n o-
- t EOI 1049 was issued because the main' annunciator I
'g typewriter qualified by testing was located in'the contrts room and tested using spectra applicable to areas outside of the control room.~It was later noted 4
that the spectra for the portion of the: control room slab that supports the main annunciator typewriter are i
identical to.the spectra for the areas outside of the control room.
This item was therefore closed.
1 EOI 1053 was issued for damping values and spectra.
input in design analysis for the starting air receiver tank other than those specified by the Hosgri report.
This item was found to be a deviation because the G
damping values were conservative and the spectra,-
although preliminary, contained identical acceleration l
- values of those in the Hosgri report.
EOI 1055 notes inadequate identification of new annulus response spectra curves.
This file was resolved 9
as a deviation.
I EOI 1062 notes differences in spectra between the design ano verification analysis 100.
The design analysis spectra inputs are larger or within 15% of the i
verification analysis spectra inputs.
This file was l
0 classified as a Class C Error because of other items (due to spectra differences).
i EOI 1063 notes unconservative differences in spectra i
between the design and verification analysis 107 in excess of 15%.
This file was resolved as a Class C Error.
EOI 1065 was issued as a result of the Reedy i
quality assurance report of PGandE noting inadequate I-control of the Hosgri response spectra.
Additiona'l information on this file is contained'in Interim Technical Report Number 2 (EOI 3004).
EOI 1068 was issued as a result of the Reedy l
quality assurance review of URS/Blume Associates.
This file concerns a lack of control of Hosgri response spectra and is discussed further in Interim Report Number 2 (EOI 3005).
EOI 1071 notes differences in spectra between'the design and verification analysis 109.
The design analysis spectra inputs that are larger or within 15% of j
the verification analysis spectra-inputs.
This file was classified as a Class C Error because of other items O
(due to spectra differences).
1
! t l
}
C t
.s.
.,w r---,-,
n
,,-mc 7-m-
_,,----,,.-,.,,,,--.,.---.----.ww-
--,,_.,,+--.,c--
e~.
.o I _.1 1
-l 9
EOI 1072 notes a reference in the design analysis for the turbine driven auxiliary feedwater pump to spectra other than those in the Hosgri Report.
This file was resolved as a deviation.
)
I EOI 1074 notes. differences between the spectra and c
' design and verification analysis of piping problem number 101.
The design spectra were found not to
{
envelop or be within 15% of the Hosgri spectra.
This file was resolved as a Class C Error.
EOI 1080 notes differences in spectra between the p
design and verification analysis 103.
The design analysis spectra inputs are larger or within 15% of the verification analysis spectra inputs.
This file was classified as a Class C Error because of other items (due to spectra differences).
2 EOI 1081 notes differences.in piping analysis 104 between design and verification spectra.
This file-was resolved as a Class C Error because the design spectra do not envelop or fall within 15% of the Hosgri spectra.
EOI 1084 notes differences in piping analysis 102 J
between the design and verification spectra.
This item was resolved as a Class C Error.
The difference in spectra were found to be the result of differences in overlap.
Both the overlap and.the spectra were notea as a Class C Error.
?
EOI 1085 notes differences in spectra between the design and verification analysis 105.
The design analysis spectra inputs are larger or within 15% of the verification analysis spectra inputs.
This file was I
classified as a Class C Error because of other items (due to spectra differences).
'5 EOI 1086 notes differences in spectra between the design and verification analysis 108.
The design analysis spectra inputs are larger or within 15% of the
{
verification analysis spectra inputs.
This file was
}
classified as a Class C Error because of other items b
(due to spectra differences),
a.
C
G, t
EOI 1093 notes areas in the auxiliary building for 9
which spectra have not*been generated.
This item
~
4 combines with 1097 as a Class A/B Error pending.
. reanalysis of the building by the DCP.
EOI 1097 notes an additional area'of the' auxiliary building for which spectra have not been generated.
This o
file was combined with EOIs 920, 986, 1029, 1070 and 1093 as a Class A/B Error pending the DCP reanalysis of
- --S the building.
7,.
EOI 1102 was issued as a result of inappropriate acceleration levels input into the design analysis for Damper 7A.
This item remains open.
EOI 1103 notes pipe supports attached to auxiliary-steel for which spectra.have not been defined.
This file remains open.
EOI 3004 was issued as a result of the Reedy quality assurance report of PGandE noting inadequate control of the Hosgri response spectra.
Additional information is contained in ITR #2.
EOI 3005 was issued as a result of the Reedy quality O
assurance report of URS/31ume concerning control of Hosgri response spectra.
Additional information is contained in ITR #2.
O i
i 3
I,
.,e e
..n
---....n.
,,e.
,m
,re---w.
a s
')
1 8.0 EVALUATION OF DESIGN ANALYSIS SPECTRA 3
8.1 INTERPRETATION RLCA identified the following concerns after comparing the verification and design analysis input spectra, comparing the Hosgri design bases to the latest URS/Blume building reports, and reviewing the PGandE Open Items (See Appendix D).
o The Hosgri report omits certain impor. tant portions of the current Hosgri design
/
bases (spectra) In addition, spectra were not controlled, Spectra are'not available for certain plant o
areas (eg. pipeway and containment interior above elevation 140 feet).
o Preliminary and incorrect spectra were used in the design of piping, equipment and components.
O 8.2 RecoMMEnnATIONS To address these concerns, the Interim Technical Report Number 1, " Additional Verification 4
and Additional Sampling, Revision 0",
contained g
four recommendations:
o Assemble the correct URS/Blume Hosgri spectra; o
Assign unique numbers to all spectra g
rigures; o
Control these design spectra and any revisions thereto; and o
Review spectra used for all Hosgri 3
qualifications against the design spectra.
RLCA will verify the DCP implementation of these recommendations.
a l..
i l
t 9.0 EVALUATION OF DCP CORRECTIVE ACTION I'n response to the recommendation listed in Section 8.2, PGandE has issued a Design Criteria Memorandum C-17 (DCU C-17) "Hosgri Response Spectra, Revision 3."
While several RLCA review comments remain unresolved, the following aspects of DCU C-17 have been: verified:
o The DCM was issued in a controlled manner.
RLCA verified the control of the revisions by inspection of the receipt card log'in the PGandE offices.
o The DCM includes the current Hosgri spectra.
o Response spectra _have now been defined for certain areas of the plant for which spectra were not previously available, as of November 1981.
This includes: the pipeway, containment structure above elevation 140 feet, intake structure at the upper support point for the auxiliary saltwater pump, and turbine building above elevation 140 feet.
The concerns raised in files 1093, 1097 and 1103
~
have not been addressed.
3 l
I I
{
l 0
l,:
~
~
0 d
9 t
10.0 CONCLUSION
OF DESIGN ANALYSIS HOSGRI SPECTRA RLCA has determined the current Hosgri design bases and reviewed seismic inputs into a sample of design analyses.
Three concerns have been identified as a result of this review and recommendations made to address
'd these concerns.
In response to these_ recommendations, the DCP has issued a controlled set of design spectra which partially addresses these concerns.
All concerns noted as a result of this review will be addressed by the DCP and verified by the IDVP.
c o
33 ik e 2
4
+
11.0 REFERENCES
~
- 1. DCMPP Independent. Design Verification Program, Program Management Plan, Phase I, July 6, 1982.
~
Revision 1,
- 2. Preliminary Report, Seismic Reverification
.D Program, Robert L. Cloud and Associates, Inc.,
November 12, 1981.
- 3. DCNPP Auxiliary Building Dynamic Seismic Analysis for the 7.5M Hosgri Ec.rthquake, URS/
John A. Blume & Associates, Engineers, October 1979.
D
- 4. DCNPP Turbine Building Evaluation and Structural Modifictions for the 7.5M Hosgri Earthquake, URS/ John A. Blume & Associates, Engineers, March 1980.
- 5. DCNPP Intake Structure Dynamic Seismic Analysis O
for the 7.5M Hosgri Criteria, URS/ John A. Blume &
Associates, Engineers, May 1979.
- 6. DCNPP Containment Structure Dynamic Seismic Analysis for the 7.5M Hosgri Criteria, URS/
i John A. Blume & Asso.ciates, Engineers,.May 1979.
- 7. PGandE Report: Seismic-Evaluation for the Postulated 4
7.5M Hosgri Earthquake.
i 8.
Interim Technical Report, Diablo Canyon Unit 1, Independent Design Verification Program, Shake 9
Table Testing, Revision 0, 7/23/82.
9.
Interim Technical Report, Diablo Canyon Unit 1, Independent Design Verification Program, Additional Verification and' Additional Sampling, Revision 0, 6/9/82.
- 10. DCNPP-IDVP-PP-003 " Preparation of Open Item Reports, Error Reports, Program Resolution Reports and IDVP Completion Reports," Revision 1, 6/18/82.
O
- 11. Independent Analysis, Hot Shutdown Panel, RLCA, P105-4-570-004, Revision 2.
- 12. PGandE Analysis, Hot Shutdown Panel, 2/16/78, P105-4-437-006.
s3 e
" s;
- 13. PGandE Analysis, Boric Acid Tank, Tab G from M& NE File 140.051, P105-4-435-014.
g
- 14. Independent Analysis, Boric Acid Tank, RLCA, P105-4-550-007, Revision 2.
- 15. PGandE Analysis, Fuel Oil Priming Tank, a
12/27/,77, Revision 0, M & NE. File 129.10 Tab G, P105-4-435-018.
- 16. Independent Analysis, Fuel Oil Priming Tank, RLCA, P105-4-550-002, Revision 2.
9
- 17. PGandE Analysis, Starting Air Receiver Tank, 12/27/77, Revision 0, M & NE File 129.10, Tab G, P105-4-435-019.
- 18. PGandE Analysis, Starting Air Receiver Tank, 2/24/78, Letter to P. Chen (NRC), M & NE' File
.i 129.10, Tab G, P105-4-435-020.
- 19. Independent Analysis, Starting Air Receiver Tank, RLCA, P105-4-550-008, Revision 0.
- 20. PGandE Analysis, Turbine Driven Auxiliary 3
Feedwater Pump, DC-663056-58, P105-4-435-012.
. 21. Independent Analysis, Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump, RLCA, P105-4-550-010, Revision 1.
- 22. PGandE Analysis, Auxiliary Saltwater Pump, 9
S.O. 4290600/603-20X34B VCM/1ST6, 3/31/78, P105-4-445-002.
- 23. Independent Analysis, Auxiliary Saltwater Pump, RLCA, P105-4-55C-Oll, Revision 2.
l 0
- 24. PGandE Analysis, Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger, M & NE File 140.062 Tab G, P105-4-435-006.
f
- 25. Independent Analysis, Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger, RLCA, P105-4-55.0-022, Revision 0.
- 26. PGandE Analysis, Volume Damper 7A, 663278-514-2, P105-4-420-Oll.
bd i
s r
,.r -
- 27. PGandE Analysis, Volume Damper 7A, EDS/PGandE-
,)82-046, P105-4-446-009,
- 28. PGandE Analysis, Volume Damper 7A, RLCA, P105-4-561-001, Revision 2.
- 29. Independent Analysis, Volume Damper 7A, RLCA,
,3 P105-4-561-001, Revision 2.
- 30. PGandE Analysis, Supply Fan S-31, EDS 0170-011-224 No. 1, Revision 0, P105-4-446-002.
- 31. Independent Analysis, Supply Fan S-31, 3
P105-4-561-006, Revision 0.
- 32. PGandE Dynamic Seismic Analysis of Main Annunciator Cabinet Structure, DC 663101-75-1, July 1977, P105-4-447-010.
4 4
.g s
e e
l e,
w
1 RobertL. Cloud and Associates, Inc 3
i.,
I i
i o
i Tables and Figures (4 Pages) i l
')
l 3
l i
l 1
i i
l 1
[s j
i l
r i
1 i
%I j
I.
1 l
3
, _ _ _ _,... _ _. ~,.. - _.,,
1 A
.i c
m m
C v3 m
RCLA (100):
2
,PG&E (8-33)
- )
=
n m
no g-w co H
Un
~
u
-s 2
N*
g a-o i
e m
a
/
2 i.00 0.05 0.10.
0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 Period (sec)
~
9 i
- )
1
~'
t i
Figure 1 Comparison of Verification and Design N-S Spectra
-Piping-s,.
a 9
e Q
em oc a
e
_RCLA (101L
_o o
w
- l' i
,PG&E (8-2 Q c
\\
s O
9
- e ue t
b o NO 8 =~
d
/
u<
e A
/
eo O
J6 c-oo 00 0'.05 li.10 0'.15 u'. L'll O'. 2 E 0'.
50 Period (sec)
E:
l O
Figure 2 Comparison of Verification and Design E-W Spectra
-Piping-
?A-
_~
O l
V U
4
,)
1:.
q i
Table I Comparison of Verification and Design Spectra - Equipment and Components Page lof 2 I
Design Analysis Verification Analysis Sample frequency Acceleratten Hosgri Report frequency Acceleration Hosgri Report (Hz)
(g)
Figure Nos.
(Hz)
,(g)
Figure Nos.
1 Electrical Equipment and Instrumentation Quellfled Ref. 12 by Analysis Re f. 11 j
Hot Shutdown Remote 4 N-5 none -
.97 N-5 4-132,4137.-141 3 E-W used valves
>33 H & V
.76 E-W.
-445,-Il4 -Il8J Control Panel j
2 V greater than.
6 V
-123,4127.-150 j
peak Hosgri Hain Annuniator Cabinet Ref. 32 1.24 N-5 Revised Revised Revised
>33.0
Response
Analysis Not Astelysis Analysis H&V Spectra E.W Completed Not Not i
2 V Completed Completed l
s's U
Tanks Ref. 13 Ref. 14 1f81 N-5 4-113.-118.-122 8eric Acid Tank 15.0 X 1.71 H 15 N
!!56 E-W
-126.-131 -136 33.0 V 0.60 V 33 V 60 V
-140,-144,-149 Diesel Generators fuel Re f.15 0.54 H Ref. 16 Gil Priming Tank 33.0 H 0.50 V Hala Structure 0.54 H 0.50 V 3-4.-5, 4-3, 33.0 V 33 H & V Attached Guage 0.M N M.bM ON 23 V 33 H 1.5 V
4-224 Olesel Generators Starting Re f. 17818 Air Receiver Tank 25.8 H
.75 H Re f. 19
>33.0 V 50 V 18 H 2.0 H
3-4,3-5,4-),4-6
>33 V 0.5 V
i Pumps I'f II Ref. 20 gg y,$
.74 E-H 17.0 H I,39 N-5 4-114.-119.-123 l
dae up
>36.0 50 V
>33.0 V
,1.41 E-W a - 127.- 132,- 137 H&V I
0.70 V
--141.-145,-150 l
l
i 6-O V
~
1 Table I Comparison of Verification and Design Spectra - Equipment and Components Page 2 of 2 Design Analysts Verification Analysis Sample frequency Acceleration Hosgri Report frequency Acceleration Hosgri Report (Hz).
(g) figure Nos.
(Hz)
(g)
Figure Nos.
Pumps (cont.)
Ref. 22 Ref. 23 Auxillary Saltwater
>33.0 N 1.00 N 28.9.H
.(Besponse Pump 31.0 V 0.75 V 4-1* 4-2 25.2 V Spectrum Analysis) 3,4, 3,5 Compunent Cooling Analysis Anal ~ysis Analysis Mater Pump Not Not Not Completed Completed Completed Heat Exchanger k
Ref. 24 Ref. 25 m
Component Cooling Hater 30.0 N 0.54 H 10.0 X (Response 3,4, 3,$
29.0 V 0.54 V 12.0 V Spectru 4-3' 4-6 Analysis)
HVAC Components Ref. 26, 27 & 2b Ref. 29 Volume camper 7A
'33.0 N & V 2.20 N
>33.0 H & V 1.81 H 4-111.-116' (Camper only, 1.87 0.8 V
-120,-124*
no attached
.7 ducting)
-147 Supply Fan 5-31 Ref. 30 (Response Spec-R*I 31 (p.s p 5c spec.
16.0 N 4-112.-117, 18.8 H trum Analysis)
>j),o y 25.0 V trum Analysis)
.-121.-325
-139.,135
-- 130,-
143
-148 Valves FCV-41. FCV-95 Not Applicable. Piping Analysis Acceleration Results used itVAC Duct and Supports Analysis not Completed l
I J
l' Robert L. Cloud and Associates, Inc 4
l i
i
)
C Appendix A EDI Reports Issued (9 Pages) l i
4
.l l
O i
l I
m m
-w
,e-
-y..,-,3
.m_, - --
--,y,..
-y.
,w-
~
?-
c C
h a
n W
~..,
+
s g,
s
~
~
5ubject Rev.
Date By Type F1
]3
, q 920 Auxiliary Building - Spectra 0
1/6/02 RLCA OIR RLCA Differences between the 1
3/22/82-RLCA PPRR/DEV l
TES i
Hoogri and Latest.URS/81mme 2
4/17/82~
TES' PRR/OIP PCand.* :
s 3
Report 3
7/19/82 TES OIR RLCA' 4
7/21/82 RLCA PPRR/CI TES 5
7/22/82 TES PRR/CI TES 6
7/22/82 TES CR MONE NO x^
967 Intake Structure - Spractre-0.
.1 1/30/82 RLCA OIR RLCA Differences between the Hosgri l'
3/22/82 RLCA PPRR/DEV TES g
and the Latest URS/Blume 2
4/17/82 TES PRR/0IP PCandE Report (3
9/3/82 TES OIP.
RLCA
'E ' 9/7 /82 4
E E.CA PPRR/CI
-TES 1
5 9/M/82 TCS PRM/Cl T2S s
6 9/10/32J:
TES CR D None NO Y
N s
t' N..
976
' Containment Exterior Spectra s
0 2/6/82
-RLCA OIR RLCA-
.l to Westinghouse 1
3/22/82 RLCA' l PPRR/CI TES
' NO. y w.
2 4/17/82 TES3 CR NONE
~ ' -
^
~~
2/6/82 RLCA~
PER/A RLCA i
3j 978 ReRenerative Heat Exchanger >
C' N
1 5/10/82 RLCA PER/C TES
'i Spectra e
2 6/7/82
'TES ER/C PCandE 3
6/21/82 TES CR NOME NO 981 Buried Piping Spectra.
0 2/6/82 RLCA OIR RLCA 1
4/30/82 RLCA PPRR/CI TES 2
5/11/82 TES PRR/CI TES 3
5/11/82
- TES CR NONE NO 983 Raceway Supports - Spectra i
0 2/6/82 RLCA-PER/A TES
]lI. 1 4/21/82 TES ER/A PCandE A
Input
'2-9/10/82 TES ER/A PCandE ST ATUS:. Status'~ls indicated by the type.of classification of latest report received by *CandE OIR - Open Item Rep 3rt ER - Error Report.
A - Class A Error PPRR - Potential Program Resolution Report CR - Completion Report.
a - Class B Error C - Class C Error PAR - Program Resolution Report CI - Closed item PER - Fotential Error Report DEV - Deviation D.
' Class 8 Error
- 3 OIP - Open Item with future action by PGandE
' 4 FIIT5ICAL N00: Physical modification required to resolve the issus.
Blank entry Indicates that
_i modification has no-t been determined.
b g
U g.
s ---
O h
G*
hi-c.
Q rp ci sb i
F1 No.
Subject R e v '.
Wate By Type
,fq,g((g "I
y,g 986 Control Room ' Spectra 0
2/6/82 RLCA OIR RLCA i
1 3/22/82 RLCA PPRR/DEV TES 2
5/11/82 TES PRR/OIP PCandE.
3 7/19/82 TES DIR RLCA 4
4 7/21/82 RLCA PPRR/CI TES 5
7/22/82 TES PRR/CI TES 6
7/22/82 TES CR NONE NO 1002 HVAC Components - Spectra
'O 2/6/82 RLCA PER/B TES Input 1
4/17/82 TES ER/B PCandE 2
4/17/82 TES OIR RLCA 3
5/21/82 RLCA PPRR/CI i
4 6/23/82 TES PRR/CI
~ TES TS 5
6/23/82 TES CR NONE
, NO
/3 1004 Electrical Equipment -
0 2/6/82 RLCA OIR RLCA Sprecera 1
3/22/82 RLCA PPRR/DEV TES 2
4/17/82 TES-
.PRR/OIP PCandE 3
5/24/82 TES OIR RLCA 4
6/9/82
.RLCA PPRR/CI TES 5
6/22/82 TES PRR/CI TES
.6 6/22/82
.TES CR NONE NO 1005 Transmittal of Spectra -
0 2/6/82 RLCA OIR RLCA Wyle Laba 1
3/9/82 RLCA PPRR/CI TES 2
4/17/82 TES CR NOME NO 1007 Electrical Equipment -
0 2/6/82 RLCA OIR RLCA Spectra Input 1
3/9/82 RLCA PPRR/CI TES 2
4/21/82 TES CR NONE NO STATUS: Status is indicated by the type of classification of latest ' report received by PCandE:
0IR - Open Item Report ER - Error Report,
A - Class A Error PPRR - Fotential Program Resolution Report CR - Completion Report' S - Class B [rror PRR - Program Resolution Report CI - Closed Ites C - Class C Error PER - Potential Erron Report DEV - De v i a t io n' D - Class 0 trror OIP - Open Item with future action by PGandE PHYSICAL N00: Physical modification required to resolve the issue.
Blank, entry indicates that modification has not been determined..
9
if f
G t$-
u d
e C
4/
4
^'I'*"
EDI Subject Rev.
Date By Type-Required Hod.
File No.
P 1008 Hain Annunciator Cabinet -
0 2/9/82 RLCA OIR RLCA Spectra 1
3/18/82 RLCA PER/C TES 2
6/8/82 TES ER/C PCandE-3 10/18/82 TES CR None No 1.
1009 Containment Interior Spectra 0
2/9/82 RLCA OIR RLCA above Elevation 140' is not 1
3/22/82 RLCA
.PPRR/DEV TES available 2
4/17/82 TES PRR/OIP PCandE 3
9/3/82 TES OIR kLCA 4
9/7/82 RLCA PPRR/CI TES 5
9/10/82 TES PRR/Cl TES 6
9/10/82-TES CR None No 1
da 1010 Turbine Building Spectra 0
2/9/82 RLCA OIR RLCA above Elevation 140' is not 1
3/22/82 RLCA PPRR/DEV TES available 2
4/17/82 TES PRR/OIP PCandE 3
7/20/82 TES OIR RLCA 4
7/21/82 RLCA PPRR/CI TES 5
7/23/82 TES PRR/CI TES 6
7/23/82 TES CR NONE NO 1011 Diesel Generator Oil Priming 0
2/9/82 RLCA OIR RLCA Tank - Spectra 1
3/17/82 RLCA PPRR/DEV RLCA 2
4/21/82 TES PRR/DEV' PCandE 3
7/9/82 TES CR NONE NO 1013 Group VI Test Spectra 0
2/9/82 RLCA OIR RLCA 1
5/27/82 RLCA PER/B TES 2
6/3/82 RLCA PER/B TES 3
6/10/82 TES
.ER/B PCandE 4
7/23/82 TES OIR RLCA ST ATUS: Status is indicated by the type of classification of latest report received by PGandE:
OIR - Open Item Report ER - Error Report A - Class A Error PPRR - Potential Program Resolution Report CR
. Completion Report 8 - Class B Error CI
. Closed Item C - Class C Error PRR - Program Resolution Report PER - Potential Error Report DEV - Deviation 0 - Cldss O Error i
OIP - Open Item with future action by PGandE PHYSICAL N00: Physical. modification required to resolve the issue. Blank entry indicates that modification has not been determined.
_ - - _ _ - ~ _
s',
v; O
O, is G
6 v'
U F1 e No.
Subject Rev.
Date
.s y Type gf',ly,",
y,gf*
q 1013 Croup VI Test Spectra (Cont.)
5 7/23/82 RLCA PPRR/CI TES l
6 7/23/82 TES PRR/CI TES 7
7/23/82 TES CR None No 1014 Pipe Rack Spectra is not 0
2/9/82 RLCA OIR RLCA available 1
3/22/82 RLCA PPRR/DEV TES 2
4/17/82 TES PRR/0IP PCandE 3
9/3/82 TES OIR RLCA i
4 9/7/82 RLCA PPRR/0IP TES 5
9/9/82 TES OIR RLCA 6
9/9/82 RLCA PER/AB TES 7
9/10/82 TES ER/AB PCandE j
1015 Diesel Generator Oil Priming 0
2/11/82 RLCA OIR RLCA i
Tank - Spectra Damping Valve 1
2/13/82 RLCA PER/C TES y-2 4/17/82 TES CR None No w
1020 Auxiliary Saltwater Pump -
0 2/18/82 RLCA OIR
-RLCA Spectra 1
3/17/82 RLCA PPRR/DEV TES 2
4/17/82 TES PRR/DEV PCandE 3
6/29/82 TES CR None No 1022 Auxiliary Saltwater Pump -
0 2/18/82 RLCA DIR RLCA Spectra at Upper Suppert 1
4/30/82 RLCA PPRR/0IP TES 2
5/10/82 TES PRR/0IP' PCandE
+
3 9/3/82 TES OIR RLCA 4
9/7/82 RLCA-PER/AB TES 5
9/10/82 TES ER/AB PCandE
^
STATUS: Status is indicated by the type of classification of 1stest report received Jby PGandE:
OIR - Open Item Report ER - Error Report A - Class A Error i
PPAR - Potential Program Resolution Report CR - Completion Report B - Class B Error i
PRR - Program Resolution Report CI - Closed Ites C - Class C Error PER - Potential Error Report DEV - Deviation 0 - Class D Error 2
DIP - Open Item with future action by.PGandE PHYSICAL M00: Physical modification required to ressive the issue.. Blank entry ladicates that modification has not been determined.
4
s.-
i G
- E G
- s C
o Action Physical 7, E 01' Subject Rev.
Date By Type Required Mod.
y, y,,
1025 Turbine Building Elevation 0
2/20/82 RLCA OIR RLCA 104' Spectra 1
3/22/82 RLCA PPRR/DEV TES 2
4/17/82 TES PRR/0IP PCandE 3
7/20/82 TES OIR RLCA 4
7/21/82 RLCA PPRR/CI TES 5
7/23/82 TES PRR/CI TES 6
7/23/82 TES CR None No Y
t.n I
\\
I
'5TATUS: Status is indicated by the type of classification of latest report received by PGandE:
OIR - Open item Report ER - Error Report A - Class A Error PPRR - Potential Program Resolution Report CA - Completion Repert 8 - Class B Error PRR - Program Resolution Report CI - Closed item C - Class C Error O - Class D Error PER - Potential Erron Report DEV - Deviation DIP - Open Item with future action by PGand[
PHYSICAL MOD: Physical modification required to resolve the issue.
Blank entry indicates that modification has not been determined.
)
w' 4&
J h
d-t 1
i M
Ph cal Subject Rev.
Date 8y Type Actloa FI No.
1 1026 Certain Turbine Buildin 0
2/20/82 RLCA OIR RLCA Spectra is contained in URS 1
3/19/82 RLCA PPRR/DEV TES 2
4/17/82 TES PRR/0IP PCandE Report and not in the Hos8ri Report 3
7/20/82 TES DIR RLCA 4
7/21/82 RLCA PER/AB TES 5
7/23/82 TES ER/AB PCandE 1028 Torsional Ree once 0
2/23/82 RLCA OIR RLCA Combination C iteria 1
3/22/82 RLCA PPRR/DEV TES 2
4/17/82 TES PRR/0IP PCandE 3
5/24/82 TES DIR RLCA 4
7/2/82 RLCA PPRR/0IP TES 5
7/13/82 TES PRR/0IP PCandE
}
1049 Main Annunciator Typewriter 0
3/8/82 RLCA OIR RLCA
$s Location 1
4/16/82 RLCA PPRR/0IP TES 2
5/10/82 TES PRR/0IP PCandE i
3 5/24/82 TES OIR RLCA 4
6/18/82 RLCA PPRR/0IP TES 4
5 7/9/82
'TES PRR/0IP PCandE 6
7/23/82 TES OIR RLCA j
7 7/23/82 RLCA PPRR/CI TES 8
7/23/82 TES PRR/CI TES 9
7/23/82 TES CR NONE NO 1053 Diesel Generator Starting 0
- 3/9/82 RLCA OIR RLCA i
Air Receiver Tank - Damping 1
3/22/82 RLCA PPRR/DEV TES Value 2
4/21/82 TES PRR/DEV PCandE 3
7/9/82 TES CR' NONE NO i
i STATUS: Status is indicated by the type of classification of latest report received by PCandE:
DIR - Open item Report ER - Error Report A
Class A Error PPRR - Potential Program Resolutten Report CA - Completion Report 8 - Class 8 Error i
PRR - Program Resolution Report CI - Closed Item C - Class C Error i
PER - Potential Errop Report DEV - Deviation 0
Class O Error.
l OIP - Open item with future.acilen by PGandE PHYSICAL MOD: Physical modificatten required to resolve the issue.
Blank entry f ad ic'a t e s ' t ha t
}
modificatfon has not been deteralmed.
1
d O
v S
4,-
s.
u v
i 1
i i
E01 Action Physical Flie No.
Subject Rev.
Date Ry Type Required Med.
1055 Annulus Spectra Curves 0
'3/10/82 RLCA OIR RLCA 1
3/19/82 RLCA PPRR/DEV TES 2
4/17/82 TES PRR/DEV PCandE.
3 5/24/82 TES CR NONE NO a
j 1962 piping 100 - Stress 0
3/15/82 RLCA OIR-RLCA Differences 1-4/30/82 RLCA OIR RLCA' 2
7/29/82 RLCA PER/C TES l
3 8/5/82 TES ER/C PCandE i
1063 Piping 107 - Stres 0
3/15/82 RLCA OIR RLCA Differences 1
7/10/82 RLCA PER/C TES 2
7/22/82 TES ER/C PCandE 1065 PCandE Findings 0
3/15/82 RLCA OIR TES 1
5/24/82
- TES CR NONE NO
%J l
1068 URS/Blume QA Findings 0
3/15/82 RLCA OIR TES l
1 5/24/82 TES CR HONE NO i
1071 Piping 109 - Stress 0
3/23/82
.RLCA OIR RLCA Differences 1
5/17/82 RLCA OIR RLCA 2
7/10/82 RLCA PER/C TES I
3 8/11/82 TES ER/C PCandE 4
9/9/82 TES CM Hone NO 1972 Turbine Driven Auxiliary 0
3/23/82 RLCA DIR RLCA Feedwater Pump - Spectra 1
6/8/82 RLCA PPRR/DEV TES 2
7/8/82 TES PRR/DEV PCandE 3
9/10/82 TES CR None NO STATUS: Status is f adicated by the type of. classification of latest report received by PGandE:
OIR - Open item Report ER - Error Report A - Class A Error j
PPRR - Potential Program Resolution Report CR - Completion Report 5 - Class 5 [rror PRR - Program Resolution Report CI - Closed item C - Class C Error PER - Potential Errop Report DEV - De'vlation 0 - Class O Error l
l OIP
.Open Item with future action by PGandE PHYSICAL MOD: Physical modification required to resolve the issue.
Blank entry indic'ates that l
modification has not been determined.
I i
o l
'b
.)
U i
s, s
l l
I Subject Rev.
Date By Typ'e A'Il'"
,d o
Tl e No.
i 1074 Piping 101 - Stres, 0
3/23/82 RLCA OIR RLCA j
Differences 1
6/18/82 RLCA pea /C TES 2
8/5/82 TES
'LR/C PCandE.
'd' H3 Piping 103 - Stress 0
4/22/82 RLCA OIR RLCA bifferences 1
8/23/82 RLCA PER/C TES 2
9/7/82 TES ER/C PCandE l
I
. Piping 104 - Stress 0
4/22/82 RLCA OIR RLCA 1981 Differences 1
8/24/82 RLCA PER/C TES 2
8/31/82 TES ER/C PCandE l
1084 Piping 102 - Stess 0
5/14/82
.RLCA DIR RLCA 8
Differences 1
7/19/82 RLCA PER/C TES C
2 8/23/82 RLCA PER/C TES 1'
3 9/10/82 TES ER/C
.PCandE i
1085 Piping 105 - Stress 0
5/14/82 RLCA OIR RLCA Differences 1
7/21/82 RLCA PER/C TES l
2 8/23/82 RLCA PER/C TES 3
8/31/82 TES ER/C PGandE i
1986 Piping 108 - Stress 0
5/14/82' RLCA OIR RLCA i
Differences 1
8/24/82 RLCA PER/C TES 2
9/10/82 TES ER/C PCandE i
1993 Auxiliary Building Areas 0
6/18/82 RLCA OIR RLCA Withouc Spectra 1
6/18/82 RLCA PPRR/0IP TES l
2 6/29/82 TES PRR/0IP PCendE i
3 7/20/82 TES OIR RLCA indicated by the type of classification of lates.t report received by PGand[:
j l
STATUS: Status is ER - Error Report A - Class A Error OIR - Open item Report CR - Completion Report 8,- Class 8 Error PPRR - Potential Program Resolution Report Cl - Closed Ites C.k Class C Error i
PRR - Program Resolution Report DEV - Seviation D,- Class D Error i
PER - Potential Error Report Item with future action by PEandE indic~ates that Blant entgy i
OIP - Open PilYSICAL MOD: Physical modificatten required to resolve the issue.
a j
andLI.lcatinn_has not been determined, i
so
r-
'.a i.,
e t
~~
Action Physical EDI Subject Rev.
Date By Type Required Nod.
File No.
1093 Auxiliary Building Areas 4
7/21/82 RLCA PPRR/CI TES Without Spectra 5
7/22/82 TES PRR/CI TES I
(cont'd) 6 7/22/82 TES CR NONE NO 1097 Auxiliary Building Area 0
7/13/82 RLCA OIR RLCA Without Spectra 1
7/14/82 RLCA PPRR/OIP TES 2
7/20/82 TES OIR RLCA 3
7/21/82 RLCA PER/AB TES 4
7/22/82 TES ER/AB PCandE 1102 Damper 7A - Spectra 0
8/19/82 RLCA OIR RI.CA 1
8/19/82 RLCA PER/C TES 2
10/6/82 TES OIR RLCA 3
10/11/82 RI.CA PER/C TES' 1103 Piping - Auxiliary Stee!
0 8/31/82 RLCA OIR RLCA 1
8/31/82 RLCA PPRR/OlP TES 2
10/3/02 TES PRR/OLP 3"
3004 PCandE QA Findings 0
5/24/82 TES OIR TES ua 1
6/22/82 TES PRR/CI TES 2
6/22/82 TES CR NONE NO 3005 URS/Blume QA Findings 0
5/24/82 TES OIR TES 1
6/22/82 TES PRR/CI TES 2
6/22/82 TES CR NONE NO i
(
STATUS: Status is indicated by the type of classification of latest report receiveJ by PGandE:
OIR - Open Item Report ER - Error Report A - Class A Error PPRR - Potential Program Resolution Report CR - Completion Repor.t B - Class 8 Error PRR - Program Resolution Report CI - Closed Item C - Class C Error i
PER - Potential Error Report DEV - Deviation 0 - Class D Error DIP - Open Item with future action by PGandE PHYSICAL N00: Physical modification required to resolve the issue. Blank entry. indicates that modification has not been determined, i
I.
)
Robert L. Cloud and Assodates, Inc b
l I
d Appendix B 1
Torsion (2 Pages) 2 1
l l
l l
I l
APPENDIX B TORSION METHODOLOGY FOR INCLUSION OF TORSION (Reference 7) i TURBINE BUILDING Torsional effects are included in the Horizontal Spectra.
INTAKE STRUCTURE Torsional effects are included in the Horizontal Spectra.
CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE (EXTERIOR)
Torsional effects are included in the Horizontal Spectra.
CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE (INTERIOR)
Torsional effects are factored into-the Horizontal Spectra by use of the following formula:
AH"AHCL +
T*
A
= Horizontal acceleration including Torsional effects.
~
H AHCL = Horizontal acceleration at Containment centerline.
X = Distance from the Containment centerline to the specific location (feet) perpendicular to A, A and A
- H ACL T
g = Acceleration due to gravity (32.2 feet /second squared).
A
= Torsional acceleration at Containment centerline.
T AUXILIARY BUILDING (FUEL HANDLING BUILDING)
')
Torsional effects are included in the elevation 188 feet Horizontal Spectra.
This elevation 188 feet Horizontal Spectra is to be used for the entire Fuel Handling Building.
B-1 n
i AUXILIARY BUILDING (ELEVATION 85 FEET AND BELOW)
Use the free field Auxiliary Building Spectra.
-AUXILIARY BUILDING (ELEVATION 10_0 FEET TO ELEVATION 163 FEET - CONCRETE STRUCTURE ONLY)
Torsional effects are factored into the Horizontal Spectra by use of the following formula:
A AH"AH AUXILIARY +
T AUXILIARY AH = Horizontal acceleration including Torsional effects.
AH AUXILIARY = Auxiliary Building Horizontal' Acceleration.
X = Distance from the center of mass (see below) to the specific location - perpendicular to A and A H
H AUXILIARY
- g = Acceleration due to gravity (32.2 feet /second squared).
AT AUXILIARY = Auxiliary Building Torsional acceleration -
~
in the same direction as A and A H
H AUXI N Y' AUXILIARY BUILDING (ELEVATION 8S FEET TO ELEVATION 100 FEET)
Interpolata between the free field Auxiliary Building Spectra and A at elevati n 100 feet.
H AUXILIARY BUILDING (CENTER OF MASS)
X taken along the North-South direction:
Center of Mass for all elevations is at the 18 line.
X taken along the East-West direction:
Center of Mass in relation to the R line for elevations 100, 115, 140 and 163.
Elevation 100 CM is 35.7 feet East of R line Elevation 115 CM is 27.6 feet East of R line Elevation 140 CM is 24.9 feet East of R line Elevation 163 CM is 67.7 feet West of R line j
1
1 6
RobertL CloudandAssociates,Inc p
RCA l
i l
i i
i 1
I i
Appendix C l
Hosgri Response for IDVP Phase I Saples
-l (1 Page) i s
l 1
i i
1 l
l l
l 1
(
t i
,,,--_-.,ma,,--.---,
-,,r,w,w-w
-,-----w+,,~
~,,----em.--_wm
Appsndix C Hosgri Spectra for IDVP Phase I Samples Hongri Repori Piaure Mnmhers e:
3-2 & 3-3 Miscellaneous Small Stuctures J
3-4 & 3-5 Vertical (Free Field) 4-1 through 4-6 Horizontal (Free Field) 4-30 through 4-47 Horizontal (Containment Exterior) 4-48 through 4-65 Vertical- (Containment Exterior) 4-66 through 4-75 Horizontal (Containment Interior)~
4-76 through 4-85 Torsional (Containment Interior)
O 4-86 & 4-87 Vertical (Containment Interior) 4-88 through 4-91 These vertical annulus spectra are superseded by the, revised annulus spectra (11/19/81).
4-110 through 4-119 Horizontal (Auxiliary) MS 4-120 through 4-127 Torsional (Auxiliary) NS 4-128 through 4-137 Horizontal (Auxiliary) EW 4-138 through 4-145 Torsional (Auxiliary) EW 4-146 through 4-150 Vertical (Auxiliary) 4-151 through 4-163 Vertical (Auxiliary) Control Room 4-205 through 4-210 Horizontal (Turbine) NS 4-211 through 4-224 Horizontal (Turbine)-EW 4-225 through 4-230 Vertical (Turbine)'
4-308 through 4-310 Intake Structure (See Figures 4-1, 4-4 and 3-5 and Table 4-53)
Note: Figures taken from the " Seismic Evaluation for Postulated 7.5M Hosgri Earthquake.
URS/Blume O
Ficure Numbers Descrintion 29 Additional Turbine Building Spectra 31 Additional Turbine Euilding Spectra 34 through 36 Additional Turbine Building Spectre 40 Additional Turbine Building Spectra 45 Additional Turbine Building Spectra 48 Additional Turbine Building Spectra 58 Additional Turbine Building Spectra 64 Additional Turbine Building Spectra i
Note: Figures taken from "URS/Blume Turbine Building Evaluation for the 7.5M Hosgri Earthquake", March 1980.
C-1
, - ~,
...m----,--e. - -.,_...,..,r._,---
y-,m,
. - ~,,.. -,.., - _. ~
r._-m
---,_-.-,_y..,--mw
Robert L. Cloud and Associates, Inc 0
1 3
l l
l 1
Appendix D PGandE Open Items (2 Pages)
W
'2
- ^*
'.J l
\\
l
~
i
-. ~_.
j g.
o v
- )
U L. -
v
~O l
PGaadt Open Itses (page I af 2) i l
Open Conclusion of Iran Ib.
Concem Resolution Resolution I
2 h digitization of the east-west All pipist analyses were reviewed to Reanalyses is com-translational metri spectra for the identify affectist pipisg. One analysis plate, and agport i
140' elevation in the auulliary build-was fo n d to need reanalysis. 'this redesign and qual-irg has been found to contain an error, piping analysis was rerm.
ification are eme-plete.
6 Certain snell bore piping spans have A large sosple of small bore pipiss has been 1&ntified as deviatirg from been reviewed and overspans identified.
seismic criteria.
Analysis has been completed to identify l
those spans which may incur seisode i
stresses exceeding allowables. ~1he per-centage of spans in this class relative to the total population is 0.19Z. Design i
requirements have been issued to correct the few overstresses fomd. Verification of sqport qualifications associated with overspens is complete and all supports reviewed were fomd to comply with the original acceptance criteria. A sample review to address the camulative effect
{
of overspane cowled with other issues is in progress.
l 8
Piping with apports attached to the Appropriate spectra were developed. h h appropriate contalssamt internal structure above new spectra are being==p= red to spectra spectra have been i
elevation 140' were dynamically analyzec used in the previous qualifications.
developed.
i using 140' spectra. Pipi, electrical W re qualifying spectra do not envelope raceway and s9 ports att d to the
. the new spectra, analyses will be per-contaissment exterior pipeway were anal-fonned to qualify piping systmas and i
yzed usisg contaisunent exterior spectra.
electrical raceway to criteria. Itxiffi-j cations will le perfonned, as required.
1 I
I i
-.~_ _ _.~_-.
I
)
O
(
9 U
O 1
O U
v
,v.
)
l Table 1 PGandt Open Items (page 2 of 2) i l
(5en Conclusion of l
Itgun Ib.
Concern Resolution pesolwion _
l 10 Seven piping malyses were identified The seven analyses will be rerun using h seven pipig j
for sdsich the spectra sets used were not appropriate spectra mets ed all renaminig malyses have been anveloped by the appropriate revised pipin6 analyses will be reviewed to assure rerm.
3 i
reorieted spectra.
use or all appropriate spectra. leere j
required, salyses will be rerm. Dbdi-fication will tg performed as required.
l 16 1he existing file 44 Hosgri Ibrizontal 1he file 44 lbrizontal and Vertical Seis-Seisedc Coefficient for the auxiliary ude Coefficients are being verified for 4
I building at elevation 163' is 5.
It consistency with current spectra. Omges should be 8.5.
will be reviewed for effect on design and 4
modifications perfonned, if required.
5 1
17 Seisade Anchor Ibveusme (SAM) effects All large bore pipig will be malyzed by were not addressed in piping malyses camputer and the effect of SAM will be j
for large bore PCmE desipi class I considered, i
lines that were installed by Spm Cri-l teria and attached to ccupwer analyzed lines.
I 18 Class 1 equipment for the maaillary Seisode molyses for Class I equipment ed saltwater systen in the intake structwo pipimg for the maciliary saltwater system j
were qualified to the Ibsgri Cnnsid Re-are beim reviewed to answe that the i
sponse Spectra instead of the Floor Re-equipment seisade qualification is main-sponse Spectra.
tained.
21 Calculations made by EDS for 14" lWAC Floor Response Spectra at elevation 163' Results of the re-l
<hact ogport had4gs used incorrect in the twbine building have been devel-analysis timas far j
seisade response spectra in some cases.
oped by FGm E.
1he HVAC Duct and its indicate that qual-1his may have resulted bec== the spec-ogports have been remalyzed for these ifications of the
)
tra provided by FGansE (shonst in Appendia appropriate spectra. 1he turbine building HVAC chact will be A of this calculatim file) inadvertant-has been checked for the new agport loads maintained and sod-j ly osmitted desipating the elevation 163' resulting frcus the reanalyzed IWAC Duct ifications are nec-
~
spectra as pertaining to the maciliary Sgports.
- essary, building only. Apparently, EDS persomel asstamed that those spectra could be used for seisade 1 at elevation 163' in the turbine bui l
D-2
d Robert L. Cloud and Associates, Inc RFA 2
1 i
l p
i i
i l
Appendix E Key Term Definitions i
(6 Pages) i l
1
\\
?
l i
l s.
- a l
l 9
U Q
s APPENDIX E
)
KEY TERMS AND DEFINITIONS (The definitions in this glossary establish'the meanings of words in the context of their use in this document.
These meanings in no way replace the specific legal and licensing definitions.)
Closed Item
- A form of program resolution of an Open Item which indicates that the reported aspect is neither an Error nor a Deviation.
No further
- IDVP action is required (from Reference 10).
Completion Report
- Used to indicate that the IDVP effort related to the Open Item identified by the File Number is complete.
It references either a Program Resolution Report which recategorized the item as a Closed Item or a PGandE document which states that no physical modification is to be applied in the case of a Deviation or a Class C or Class D Error (from Reference 10).
DCM C-17 i
- PGandE's Design Criteria Memorandum C "Hosgri Response Spectra, Revision 3."
DCNPP-1
- Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1.
- Comoined Pacific Gas and Electric Company and 9
Bechtel Power Corportion Project Team.
Equivalent static method
- Static analysis methodology whereby an acceleration factor is applied to the component configuration.
Q EOI
- Error and Open Item Report.
E-1
..w..
.-.e
..-___m
..s
O P
Error Report.
- An Error is a form.of program resolution of an J
Open Item indicating an incorrect result that has i
been verified as such.
It may be'due to a math-i ematical mistake, use of wrong analytical method, omission of data or use of. inapplicable 1
data.
Each Error shall be classified as one of the following:
o Class A: An Error is considered Class A if design criteria or operating limits of safety related l
CP equipment are exceeded and, as a result, physical modifications or changes in operating procedures are required.
Any PGandE corrective action is subject to verification by the IDVP.
o Class B: An Error is considered Class B if design criteria or operating limits of safety related equipment are exceeded, but are resolvable by means of more realistic calculations or retesting..
Any PGandE corrective action is subject to veri-i fication by the IDVP.
O o Class C: An Error is considered Class C if incorrect engineering or installation of safety related equipment is found, but no design criteria or operating limits are exceeced.
tio physical modifications are required, out if l
any are applied they are sub]ect to verification
~
by.the IDVP.
o Class D An Error is considered Class D if safety related equipment is not affected.
No physical modifications are required, but if any are applied, they are subject to 3
verification by the IDVP (From Reference 10).
1 FSAR i
1
- PGandE's Final Safety Analysis Report.
Field Verification IDVP process of verifying actual configuration of i
equipment, buildings and components at the installation site against PGandE drawings.
o E-2 4
m
-v-n--
-w-.
--n-----r..4
-~-
~y.-
3 D
Hosgri Criteria 0
Licensing criteria referring specifically to l
the postulated 7.5M Hosgri earthquake.
Hosgri Report 9
- A report issued by PGandE that summarizes their evaluation of the DCNPP-1 for the postulated Hosgri 7.5M earthquake.
Includes-seismic-.
licensing criteria.
Hosgri 7.5M Earthquake
- Maximum intensity earthquake for which the plant is designed to remain functional.
Same as Safe Shutdown Earthquake (SSE).
Independent analysis
- Seismic analysis performed by Robert L. Cloud and Associates.
Interface 4
- Communication between PGandE and their seismic '
service related contractors.
Interim technical report Interim technical reports are prepared when a 3
program participant has completed an aspect of their assigned effort in order to provide the completed analysis and conclusion.
These may i
be in support of an Error, Open Item or Program Resolution Report, in support of a portion of the work which verifies acceptability or f
in support of other IDVP action.
Since such a report is a conclusion of the program, it is 3
subject to the review and approval of the Program !!anager.
The report will be trans-mitted simultaneously to PGandE and to NRC a
(From. Reference 1).
1
)
1 h
E-3 i
i
, - ~... - - -.. - -,
.-e
O
^
6 p
Modal superposition method
?
- Dynamic analysis methodology-whereby responses are calculated separately on a mode by mode basis and then combined.
NRC O
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRC Order Suspending License CLI-81-30
- The order dated November 19, 1981 that sus-pended the license to load fuel and operate
')
DCNPP-1 at power levels up to 5% of full power and specified the programs that must be completed prior to lifting of the suspension.
Open Item
- An Open Item Report is issued for the purpose of reporting an IDVP response to a QA and Design Control deficiency, a violation of the verification criteria, or an apparent inconsistency in the performance of the work.
The forms of program U,
resolution of an Open Item are recategorization as an Error, Deviation, or a Closed Item.
(From Reference 10).
PGandE g
- Pacific Gas and Electric Company Phase I Program
- Review performed by RLCA, RFR, and TES restricted to verifying work performed prior to June 1978 related to the Hosgri re-evaluation design s
activities of PGandE and their service-related contractors.
.~j 3
E-4
I 9
r L.
e
'I PGandE Design Class I 0
- PGandE engineering classification for structures, l
l systems and components which corresponds to'NRC i
Regulatory Guide 1.29 Seismic Category I class-ification.
Potential. Program Resolution Report and Potential Error Report-U
- Forms used for communication within IDVP.(Reference.10).
Program Resolution Report I'
- Used to indicate that the specific-item is no longer active in the IDVP.
It indicates whether the resolution is a Closed Item, a Deviation, oc' that responsibility for an Open Item has been transferred to the PGandE Technical. Program.
Further IDVP action is required upon completion of the associated PGandE Technical Program Task if the IDVP transfers an Open Item to PGandE or if physical modifications are applied with respect-to a deviation (Reference 10).
- I C
- Quality Assurance.
Response
'3
- The motion resulting from an excitation of a device or system under specified conditions.
Response Spectra
- Graph showing relationship between acceleration g
and frequency. Used in seismic analysis.
RLCA
- Robert L. Cloud and Associates, Inc.
g RFR
- Roger F. Recay, Inc.
O E-5
.u
l 7
Sample e
- Initial Sample stipulated in Phase I Program of equipment, components, and buildings.to be design verified by independent analysis.
Sampling Approach
's
~
- Method us'ed by the IDVP to determine the initial sample (buildings, piping, equipment and compon-
~
ents) for analysis and to provide for sample expansion when required.
C' Span Evaluation
- Spacing rules used to construct and qualify piping in l'ieu of dynamic analysis for all configurations.
Spectral input
- Acceleration value taken from response spectra for input into seismic analysis.
SWEC s
~
7
- Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation TES
- Teledyne Engineering Services Verification Program
- Undertaken by the IDVP to evaluate Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant for compliance with the licensing criteria, e
7
- i E-6 s':
\\ o.
O RobertL. Cloud and Associates, Inc
.3 l
1 4
j l
i 1
Appendix F Program Manager's Assessa nt (1 Page) i i
i i
I I
I l
2 l
l I
ea i
a T
)
in l
1
)
i l
I
9 a*
APPENDIX F 7
PROGRAM MANAGER'S ASSESSMENT As IDVP Program Manager, Teledyne Engineering Services (TES), has reviewed the work performed by RLCA in the verification review of. the Hosgri seismic ' inputs that were used in the qualification process of
~
OCNPP.
It is TES judgment that the RLCA review was comprehensive and sufficiently detailed to identify the significant concerns in the Hosgri input qualification process.
Each of the forty-four (44) error,and open item (E0I) reports listed in this ITR has been thoroughly reviewed by TES and for. the majority, has been resolved and issued as an IDVP program resolution report.
In our disposition of these E0I files, TES-r has had numerous meetings and discussions with RLCA and has reviewed much of the documentation that formed the basis of each E0I and its recomended disposition.
'.)
Based on this review and evaluation process to date, TES :has concurred with the RLCA identification of the significant concerns, their recomendations to address those concerns, the adequacy of the DCP corrective action taken to date, and the RLCA program for the remaining verification of corrective action related to the Hosgri-input aspects of the IDVP program.
f) 9 2
F-1
..,