ML20080R332: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20080R332
| number = ML20080R332
| issue date = 01/23/1984
| issue date = 01/23/1984
| title = Responds to NRC 831216 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-250/83-36 & 50-251/83-36.Corrective Actions:Qc Procurement Procedures Reviewed W/Appropriate Personnel
| title = Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-250/83-36 & 50-251/83-36.Corrective Actions:Qc Procurement Procedures Reviewed W/Appropriate Personnel
| author name = Williams J
| author name = Williams J
| author affiliation = FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
| author affiliation = FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = L-84-15, NUDOCS 8402280244
| document report number = L-84-15, NUDOCS 8402280244
| title reference date = 12-16-1983
| package number = ML20080R319
| package number = ML20080R319
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC

Latest revision as of 17:30, 26 September 2022

Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-250/83-36 & 50-251/83-36.Corrective Actions:Qc Procurement Procedures Reviewed W/Appropriate Personnel
ML20080R332
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/23/1984
From: Williams J
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20080R319 List:
References
L-84-15, NUDOCS 8402280244
Download: ML20080R332 (3)


Text

( .

FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY January 23,1984 L-84-15 Mr. Jmes P. O'Reilly Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street NW, Suite 2900 Atl anta, Georgi a 30303

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

1 Re: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 Inspection Report 83-36 Florida Power & Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection report and a l

response is attached.

l There is no proprietary information in the report.

Very truly yours, b*

! J. W. Willi ms, Jr.

l Vice President l Nuclear Energy Department i

JWW/PLP/js Att achment cc: Mr. Janas P. O'Reilly, Region II Harold F. Reis, Esquire PNS-LI-84-35 l

l 8402280244 840209 PDR ADOCK 05000250 G PDR PEOPLE. .SERVIMG PEOPLE

( .

ATTACIMENT RE: TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 Am 4 DOCKET WS. 50-250, 50-251 IE INSPECTION REPORT 83-36 FINDING:

10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion IV, and the licensee's accepted QA Progran (FPL-NQA-100A, Revi sion 6), TQR4, collectively requi re that measures be established to assure that applicable regulatory requirements are suitably included or referenced in documents for procurement of materials.

Contrary to the above, measures have not been established to assure that applicable regulatory requirements are included or referenced in documents for procurement of materials in that:

1. Pl c.nt procedures have not been provided for determining that materials (spare and replacement parts) are purchased to specifications and codes equivalent to those specified for the original equipment.
2. Procedures have not been provided to assure consistency between corporate and plant staffs concerning classifications of materials. Addition ally, procedures have not been provided to handle unresolved issues between corporate and plant staffs relative to safety classification differences.

RESPONSE

1. First Example:

A. FPL concurs with the finding.

B. The reason for the finding is that the requi rement to purchase replacements equal to or better than the original quality has been so ingrained into our purchasers no one noticed it wasn't specifically stated in the plant procedure.

C. As corrective action, it has be reaffinned that plant QC procurement document revi ewers understand the requirement to b ly repl acement material equal to or better than original equipment.

D. In order to prevent recurrence, appropriate p1 ant procedures will be revised to assure spare parts are purchased equal to or better quality than original equipment.

E. Full compliance will be achieved by March 31, 1984.  ;

l l

T , .

ATTACMENT RE: TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 AND 4 DOCKET 105. 50-250, 50-251 IE INSPECTION REPORT 83-36 ,

l RESPONSE: (cont'd) i

2. Second Exanple: i I

A. FPL concurs 'with the finding in part As discussed #.th the inspector, a procedure exists for t. ' resolution of issues i

between corporate and pl ant staff' rel ative to safety cl assi fication di f ferences. Final .l assi fi c ati on is the responsiblity of power ;21 ant engi neeri ng , but pl ant di s agreements with cl assi fi cations are routi nely resolved through the request for engineering assistance system, which is embodied in a corporate procedure.

B. It was our judgement that our est abli shed QA progran and Quality Procedures involved with safety and qu ality classification provided sufficient guidance and controls for the spare parts ordering process.

C.

and D. As corrective action, a new procedure will be developed to formali ze our practices concerning engineering review of procurement documents. This procedure is schedul ed to be completed for corporate review by April 20, 1984.

E. Full compli ance will be achieved by July 31, 1984 when the procedure is scheduled to be implemented.

t l

l 1

l 1

l l

I l l

)

u_