IR 05000348/1998009: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:- - _ - _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - - _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ . _
{{#Wiki_filter:June 29, 1998
UNITED STATES
 
/pn rf49'o,'      NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 8  n    REGION 11
==SUBJECT:==
$f
NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-348/98-09 AND OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS REPORT N0. 2-97-011)
"'
y    ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER e    61 FORSYTH STREET. SW, SUITE 23T85
. h,      ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30303-3415
.
  .....
'
,        June 29, 1998 IA 98-030 I'
,,
>
  'Mr. Lloyd .[HOME ADDRESS DELETED PURSUANT TO 10 CFR 2.206]
SUBJECT:     NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-348/98-09 AND OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS REPORT N0. 2-97-011)


==Dear Mr. Chesser:==
==Dear Mr. Chesser:==
Thank you for your response which we received on June 3. 1998, to our Notice t
Thank you for your response which we received on June 3. 1998, to our Notice of Violation issued on May 15, 1998. We have evaluated your response and t
of Violation issued on May 15, 1998. We have evaluated your response and found that it meets the intent of 10 CFR 2.201.
found that it meets the intent of 10 CFR 2.201.
 
' Although your letter did not explicitly state the specific actions you have taken and any additional actions you plan to prevent recurrence, the tone of
 
your. letter indicates that the type of activities which caused this violation i
will not be repeated..Specifically, you stated in your letter that "I will not be worried about deadlines in the future.
 
I will be more concerned about.


' Although your letter did not explicitly state the specific actions you have taken and any additional actions you plan to prevent recurrence, the tone of     1 your. letter indicates that the type of activities which caused this violation    i will not be repeated. .Specifically, you stated in your letter that "I will not be worried about deadlines in the future. I will be more concerned about.
the quality of work I do from now on."


the quality of work I do from now on." The NRC has interpreted this statement
The NRC has interpreted this statement
..
..
to be your assurance to the NRC. that we can have confidence that you will l adhere to NRC requirements should you be employed in the nuclear industry in
to be your assurance to the NRC. that we can have confidence that you will l
; _the future.
adhere to NRC requirements should you be employed in the nuclear industry in
;
_the future.


Our review regarding this matter has been completed. This letter closes our
Our review regarding this matter has been completed. This letter closes our
'
'
  -actions associated with this violation. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of j
j-actions associated with this violation.
the NRC's " Rules of Practice." Part 2. Title 10. Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter, with your address removed, will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
 
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice." Part 2. Title 10. Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter, with your address removed, will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
 
Si cerely.


Si cerely. $
$
i i
i i
l         Pa E. Fredrickson, Chief Maintenance Branch Division of Reactor Safety
l Pa E. Fredrickson, Chief Maintenance Branch Division of Reactor Safety
            .J h0 h (fY
. h0 J
,  9807270184 980629     f
h (fY 9807270184 980629 f
,
PDR ADOCK 05000348 m
'
'
PDR    ADOCK 05000348 m G     PDR h (
G PDR h
- - - - - - _ - - _ _ -     -
(
- - - - - - _ - - _ _ -
-
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 23:59, 2 December 2024

Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-348/98-09. Statement Made in Ltr Interpreted to Be Assurance to NRC to Have Confidence That NRC Requirements Will Be Adhered to
ML20236S713
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 06/29/1998
From: Fredrickson P
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Chesser L
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
References
50-348-98-09, 50-348-98-9, IA-98-030, IA-98-30, NUDOCS 9807270184
Download: ML20236S713 (1)
v • d • e


Text

June 29, 1998

SUBJECT:

NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-348/98-09 AND OFFICE OF INVESTIGATIONS REPORT N0. 2-97-011)

Dear Mr. Chesser:

Thank you for your response which we received on June 3. 1998, to our Notice of Violation issued on May 15, 1998. We have evaluated your response and t

found that it meets the intent of 10 CFR 2.201.

' Although your letter did not explicitly state the specific actions you have taken and any additional actions you plan to prevent recurrence, the tone of

your. letter indicates that the type of activities which caused this violation i

will not be repeated..Specifically, you stated in your letter that "I will not be worried about deadlines in the future.

I will be more concerned about.

the quality of work I do from now on."

The NRC has interpreted this statement

..

to be your assurance to the NRC. that we can have confidence that you will l

adhere to NRC requirements should you be employed in the nuclear industry in

_the future.

Our review regarding this matter has been completed. This letter closes our

'

j-actions associated with this violation.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice." Part 2. Title 10. Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter, with your address removed, will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

Si cerely.

$

i i

l Pa E. Fredrickson, Chief Maintenance Branch Division of Reactor Safety

. h0 J

h (fY 9807270184 980629 f

,

PDR ADOCK 05000348 m

'

G PDR h

(

- - - - - - _ - - _ _ -

-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000348/1998009&oldid=3932387"