ML20065R047: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:N    p,    ,
* b              /
*~; .t a ','.                    *
[O _ ;Q UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNp3LOS ANGELES                                                                                            jf SIJLKELEY
* DAVIS
* IRVINE
* 1.0S ANGELES
* FIVERSIDE = SAN DIECO
* SAN FRANCISCO                    SANTA BARBARA
* SANT CRUZ SCHOOL OF ENCINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCE
* LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90024 January 30, 1976
                                                                                                                .A . N
                                                                                                                  . '                f
                                                                          ,'                                ,j',[                q.,
(X
                                                                                                        . '*.} #
Karl R. Goller                                      .
                                                                                                      ' [O t,,'"d )']d a f Assistant Director of Operating Reactors                                          'i  .
l Division of Reactor Licensing                                                        T                3 . .
                                                                                                                            "'e q,  *      '
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                      .
Washington, D.C.                20555                                  .'^~
um      o
                                                                                                                      ' -d '
 
==Dear Mr. Coller:==
 
Due to the sensitive nature of the contents of this letter, we request that this document be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to section 2.790 of 10 CFR Part 2.
We have at this facility a full core loading of new fuel, fuel plate scrap, and uranyl nitrate solution, all at an enrichment of 93*..
Uc also have on hand two 32 gram Pu-239-Be neutron sources. This gives us a non-exempt SNM inventory. of Icss 'than 5 kg.                                      ,
We request that we be allowed to retain this inventory for the following reasons:
: a. To be abic to perform low power experiments along with computer code work, whereby irradiated fuel is temporarily replaced by ncn irradiated fuel. This would greatly reduce experimental error and personnel exposure,
: b. To have on hand .'cw fuel to replace damaged fuel elements.
: c. To have inherent flexibility because we are a university facility. Projects and experiments come up often with very littic 1 cad time.          If we do not possess the proper material, it is more than likely that we may have extreme difficulty acquiring it and a finite possibility of not obtaining it.
We therefore request permission to have on hand our existing SNM inventory. We have provided adequate protection according to NRC and have followed the advice of Doug Schuster of Region V to the letter.
We are also within the limits set forth by 10 CFR.
Sincerely yours,
                                                                                                  $[N Charles E. Ashbaugh III Reactor Supervisor 8210290051 820930                                                                                                      004 002-PDR FOIA HIRSCH82-381                  PDR NUCLE AR ENERGY LADORATORY                                                              TItOMAS E. It!CKS. Professor and Director
 
                                      ..                .w....an....                v...........
N 4
4,*Th'7,'f((,$.
                      ?
WASHit4GTCN. D. C' 20555 e-        . 31.g,y: m. f      a
                        $,    .cf    /              t            January 29, 197d R. Purple, Chief, Operating Reactors Branch '1, D0k D. Ziemann, Chief, Operating Reactors Branch #2, DOR                                          .
                          ,G. Lear, Chief, Operating Reactors Branch #3, DOR-                                          -
R. Reid, Chief, Operating Reactors Branch :f 1, DOR WITIDIOLDING OF SPECIAL NUCLEAR !L\TERIAL (SNM) INVENTORY INFORMATION FOR NON-POWER REACTOR FACILITIES ,
* Although license authorization limits for SNM at non-power reactors are not . considered sensitive and c:ay be mentioned freely in any correspondence, the specific types, enrichments and amounts of SNM actually held on-hand by non-power reactor licensees should be
                            " withheld from public disclosure".          The amount .of-uranium - 235 (contained in uranium enriched to 20 percent or more'in the uranium - 235 isotope), uranius - 233, or plutoniun held by the licensee as unirradiated fuel is particularly sensitive intormation.              ,
Therefore, in your preparation of safety evaluations or other documents for license amendments to reduce the authori:ation limit of SNM for non-power reactor licensecs, no reference should be made to the actual o,uantity of SN'! that a particular facility has on                                  .
hand. The current and projected authori:ation limits in the license l-e    may,bc disclosed.                                                      *
                                                                                /                              ~&
I                                            -
Karl R. Coller, Assistant Director
      .                  .                              .                      for Operating Reactors
        .                                                                      Division of Operating Reactors
!      l                                                        .
      -l                                                                          .
t l        _
r i
i i
s
!      t i
l l            . :.                  ..                      .      s.    .  ,                                                      ._-
l                                              .
 
j:~pj G F g ) - ) ?/
      \ A, -
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 IE Circular No. 76 - 03 DATE: September 13, 1976 RADIATION EXPOSURES IN REACTOR CAVITIES DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES:
On March 18, 1976, an employee at the Zion station received a "whole body" radiation dose of 8 rems or more upon entering the cavity beneath the reactor vessel during a refueling out-age. On April 5, 1976, a similar reactor cavity entry at Indian Point resulted in a 10-rem whole body dose to a licen-see employee. A similar entry on October 5, 1972 caused a 5-rem dose to a Point Beach employee.
These three overexposures appear to have been caused by failure to appropriately control entry into high radiation areas, failure to conduct adequate surveys and failure to compensate for expo-sure rate variations that can occur in various areas in power reactors, e.g., the cavity beneath cle3 reactor vessel. With the incore thimbles and detectors inserted into the core, radiation levels in the cavity appear to be low. With the thimbles or detectors withdrawn into the cavity', however, exposure rates of hundreds or possibly thousands of roentgens per hour can exist.
Overexposures can occur in seconds.
All three overexposure events involved entry into potentially l
high radiation areas without surveys and/or special controls over equipment which could cause transients in the exposure
!              rate.
l t
Y g
O yo          /
        ~
9bb
 
        )
  ',_ tr bt . '
IE Circular No. 76 - 03 Date: September 13, 1976 ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY LICENSEES:
While the three exposures above occurred at pressurized water reactors, similar situations could develop at other types of reactors, e.g., pneumatic irradiation equipment areas (research reactors) and traveling incore probe equipment areas (boiling water reactors). Accordingly, holders of power, test and research reactor operating licenses are to complete the following:
: 1. Perform a thorough review of plant areas and operations to identify high radiation areas, both continuous and transient, as defined in 10 CFR 20.202(b).
: 2. Verify that entryways into high radiation areas are con-spicuously posted and locked or otheruise controlled in such a manner as to explicitly identify the nature of the hazard, appropriately control entry, and require adequate pre-entry surveys,
: 3. Ensure that radiation protection procedures and radiation protection training and retraining programs specifically address the matter of control of and access to such areas and initiate appropriate retraining of all plant personnel,
: 4. Ensure rhat the procedures governing personnel entry into all actual or potential high radiation areas permit such entry only after appropriate management re- 'v and approval so that conditions within the area are known d not subject to change while the area is occupied,
: 5. Periodically audit whatever controls result from item 1-4, above, to ensure their continued effectiveness, and
: 6. Confirm by written reply within 60 days that the actions for items 1-4 above, have been or are being taken. A record, detailing findings, actions taken, and actions to be taken, should be retained for review by NRC during the next radiological safety inspection.
This request for information was approved by GAO under a blanket clearance number B-180225 (R0072); this clearance expires July 31, 1977.
k
                                            . . . .                _    .-}}

Latest revision as of 04:52, 6 January 2021

Forwards SNM Inventory Info for Nonpower Reactor Facilities. Info Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790).Authorization to Retain Inventory Requested
ML20065R047
Person / Time
Site: 05000142
Issue date: 01/30/1976
From: Ashbaugh C
CALIFORNIA, UNIV. OF, LOS ANGELES, CA
To: Goller K
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20064K495 List:
References
FOIA-82-381 981, NUDOCS 8210290051
Download: ML20065R047 (2)
v • d • e


Text

N p, ,

  • b /
  • ~; .t a ','. *

[O _ ;Q UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNp3LOS ANGELES jf SIJLKELEY

  • DAVIS
  • IRVINE
  • 1.0S ANGELES
  • FIVERSIDE = SAN DIECO
  • SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA
  • SANT CRUZ SCHOOL OF ENCINEERING AND APPLIED SCIENCE

.A . N

. ' f

,' ,j',[ q.,

(X

. '*.} #

Karl R. Goller .

' [O t,,'"d )']d a f Assistant Director of Operating Reactors 'i .

l Division of Reactor Licensing T 3 . .

"'e q, * '

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission .

Washington, D.C. 20555 .'^~

um o

' -d '

Dear Mr. Coller:

Due to the sensitive nature of the contents of this letter, we request that this document be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to section 2.790 of 10 CFR Part 2.

We have at this facility a full core loading of new fuel, fuel plate scrap, and uranyl nitrate solution, all at an enrichment of 93*..

Uc also have on hand two 32 gram Pu-239-Be neutron sources. This gives us a non-exempt SNM inventory. of Icss 'than 5 kg. ,

We request that we be allowed to retain this inventory for the following reasons:

a. To be abic to perform low power experiments along with computer code work, whereby irradiated fuel is temporarily replaced by ncn irradiated fuel. This would greatly reduce experimental error and personnel exposure,
b. To have on hand .'cw fuel to replace damaged fuel elements.
c. To have inherent flexibility because we are a university facility. Projects and experiments come up often with very littic 1 cad time. If we do not possess the proper material, it is more than likely that we may have extreme difficulty acquiring it and a finite possibility of not obtaining it.

We therefore request permission to have on hand our existing SNM inventory. We have provided adequate protection according to NRC and have followed the advice of Doug Schuster of Region V to the letter.

We are also within the limits set forth by 10 CFR.

Sincerely yours,

$[N Charles E. Ashbaugh III Reactor Supervisor 8210290051 820930 004 002-PDR FOIA HIRSCH82-381 PDR NUCLE AR ENERGY LADORATORY TItOMAS E. It!CKS. Professor and Director

.. .w....an.... v...........

N 4

4,*Th'7,'f((,$.

?

WASHit4GTCN. D. C' 20555 e- . 31.g,y: m. f a

$, .cf / t January 29, 197d R. Purple, Chief, Operating Reactors Branch '1, D0k D. Ziemann, Chief, Operating Reactors Branch #2, DOR .

,G. Lear, Chief, Operating Reactors Branch #3, DOR- -

R. Reid, Chief, Operating Reactors Branch :f 1, DOR WITIDIOLDING OF SPECIAL NUCLEAR !L\TERIAL (SNM) INVENTORY INFORMATION FOR NON-POWER REACTOR FACILITIES ,

  • Although license authorization limits for SNM at non-power reactors are not . considered sensitive and c:ay be mentioned freely in any correspondence, the specific types, enrichments and amounts of SNM actually held on-hand by non-power reactor licensees should be

" withheld from public disclosure". The amount .of-uranium - 235 (contained in uranium enriched to 20 percent or more'in the uranium - 235 isotope), uranius - 233, or plutoniun held by the licensee as unirradiated fuel is particularly sensitive intormation. ,

Therefore, in your preparation of safety evaluations or other documents for license amendments to reduce the authori:ation limit of SNM for non-power reactor licensecs, no reference should be made to the actual o,uantity of SN'! that a particular facility has on .

hand. The current and projected authori:ation limits in the license l-e may,bc disclosed. *

/ ~&

I -

Karl R. Coller, Assistant Director

. . . for Operating Reactors

. Division of Operating Reactors

! l .

-l .

t l _

r i

i i

s

! t i

l l . :. .. . s. . , ._-

l .

j:~pj G F g ) - ) ?/

\ A, -

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 IE Circular No. 76 - 03 DATE: September 13, 1976 RADIATION EXPOSURES IN REACTOR CAVITIES DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES:

On March 18, 1976, an employee at the Zion station received a "whole body" radiation dose of 8 rems or more upon entering the cavity beneath the reactor vessel during a refueling out-age. On April 5, 1976, a similar reactor cavity entry at Indian Point resulted in a 10-rem whole body dose to a licen-see employee. A similar entry on October 5, 1972 caused a 5-rem dose to a Point Beach employee.

These three overexposures appear to have been caused by failure to appropriately control entry into high radiation areas, failure to conduct adequate surveys and failure to compensate for expo-sure rate variations that can occur in various areas in power reactors, e.g., the cavity beneath cle3 reactor vessel. With the incore thimbles and detectors inserted into the core, radiation levels in the cavity appear to be low. With the thimbles or detectors withdrawn into the cavity', however, exposure rates of hundreds or possibly thousands of roentgens per hour can exist.

Overexposures can occur in seconds.

All three overexposure events involved entry into potentially l

high radiation areas without surveys and/or special controls over equipment which could cause transients in the exposure

! rate.

l t

Y g

O yo /

~

9bb

)

',_ tr bt . '

IE Circular No. 76 - 03 Date: September 13, 1976 ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY LICENSEES:

While the three exposures above occurred at pressurized water reactors, similar situations could develop at other types of reactors, e.g., pneumatic irradiation equipment areas (research reactors) and traveling incore probe equipment areas (boiling water reactors). Accordingly, holders of power, test and research reactor operating licenses are to complete the following:

1. Perform a thorough review of plant areas and operations to identify high radiation areas, both continuous and transient, as defined in 10 CFR 20.202(b).
2. Verify that entryways into high radiation areas are con-spicuously posted and locked or otheruise controlled in such a manner as to explicitly identify the nature of the hazard, appropriately control entry, and require adequate pre-entry surveys,
3. Ensure that radiation protection procedures and radiation protection training and retraining programs specifically address the matter of control of and access to such areas and initiate appropriate retraining of all plant personnel,
4. Ensure rhat the procedures governing personnel entry into all actual or potential high radiation areas permit such entry only after appropriate management re- 'v and approval so that conditions within the area are known d not subject to change while the area is occupied,
5. Periodically audit whatever controls result from item 1-4, above, to ensure their continued effectiveness, and
6. Confirm by written reply within 60 days that the actions for items 1-4 above, have been or are being taken. A record, detailing findings, actions taken, and actions to be taken, should be retained for review by NRC during the next radiological safety inspection.

This request for information was approved by GAO under a blanket clearance number B-180225 (R0072); this clearance expires July 31, 1977.

k

. . . . _ .-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20065R047&oldid=3074272"