ML092880519: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:October 15, 2009  
{{#Wiki_filter:October 15, 2009 MEMORANDUM TO:             Harold K. Chernoff, Chief Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:                     Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager /ra/
 
Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
MEMORANDUM TO: Harold K. Chernoff, Chief Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:   Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager /ra/ Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2, DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NOS. MD7874 AND MD7875)  
SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2, DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NOS. MD7874 AND MD7875)
 
The attached draft request for information (RAI) was transmitted on October 15, 2009, to Mr. Jeff Keenan of PSEG Nuclear LLC (PSEG or the licensee). The draft RAI was transmitted to facilitate the technical review being conducted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and to support a conference call (if needed) with PSEG in order to clarify the licensees submittals dated April 10, 2008, October 13, 2008, and February 10, 2009, in response to Generic Letter 2008-01, Managing Gas Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems for Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The draft questions were sent to ensure that they were understandable, the regulatory basis was clear, and to determine if the information was previously docketed. Additionally, review of the draft RAI would allow PSEG to evaluate and agree upon a schedule to respond to the RAI.
The attached draft request for information (RAI) was transmitted on October 15, 2009, to Mr. Jeff Keenan of PSEG Nuclear LLC (PSEG or the licensee). The draft RAI was transmitted to facilitate the technical review being conducted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and to support a conference call (if needed) with PSEG in order to clarify the licensee's submittals dated April 10, 2008, October 13, 2008, and February 10, 2009, in response to Generic Letter 2008-01, "Managing Gas Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems" for Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The draft questions were sent to ensure that they were understandable, the regulatory basis was clear, and to determine if the information was previously docketed. Additionally, review of the draft RAI would allow PSEG to evaluate and agree upon a schedule to respond to the RAI.  
This memorandum and the attachment do not convey or represent an NRC staff position regarding the licensee's submittals.
 
Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311
This memorandum and the attachment do not convey or represent an NRC staff position regarding the licensee's submittals.  
 
Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311  


==Attachment:==
==Attachment:==
Draft RAI  
Draft RAI
 
October 15, 2009


MEMORANDUM TO: Harold K. Chernoff, Chief Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:   Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager /ra/ Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  
October 15, 2009 MEMORANDUM TO:             Harold K. Chernoff, Chief Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:                     Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager /ra/
Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2, DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NOS. MD7874 AND MD7875)  
SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2, DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NOS. MD7874 AND MD7875)
 
The attached draft request for information (RAI) was transmitted on October 15, 2009, to Mr. Jeff Keenan of PSEG Nuclear LLC (PSEG or the licensee). The draft RAI was transmitted to facilitate the technical review being conducted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and to support a conference call (if needed) with PSEG in order to clarify the licensees submittals dated April 10, 2008, October 13, 2008, and February 10, 2009, in response to Generic Letter 2008-01, Managing Gas Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems for Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The draft questions were sent to ensure that they were understandable, the regulatory basis was clear, and to determine if the information was previously docketed. Additionally, review of the draft RAI would allow PSEG to evaluate and agree upon a schedule to respond to the RAI.
The attached draft request for information (RAI) was transmitted on October 15, 2009, to Mr. Jeff Keenan of PSEG Nuclear LLC (PSEG or the licensee). The draft RAI was transmitted to facilitate the technical review being conducted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and to support a conference call (if needed) with PSEG in order to clarify the licensee's submittals dated April 10, 2008, October 13, 2008, and February 10, 2009, in response to Generic Letter 2008-01, "Managing Gas Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems" for Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The draft questions were sent to ensure that they were understandable, the regulatory basis was clear, and to determine if the information was previously docketed. Additionally, review of the draft RAI would allow PSEG to evaluate and agree upon a schedule to respond to the RAI.  
This memorandum and the attachment do not convey or represent an NRC staff position regarding the licensee's submittals.
 
Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311
This memorandum and the attachment do not convey or represent an NRC staff position regarding the licensee's submittals.  
 
Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311  


==Attachment:==
==Attachment:==
Draft RAI  
Draft RAI DISTRIBUTION PUBLIC LPL1-2Reading RidsNrrDorlLpl1-2 Resource RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource RidsNrrPMSalem Resource KDesai, NRR/SRXB ACCESSION NO.: ML092880519 OFFICE       PDI-2/PM NAME         REnnis DATE         10/15/2009 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
 
DISTRIBUTION PUBLIC LPL1-2Reading RidsNrrDorlLpl1-2 Resource RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource RidsNrrPMSalem Resource KDesai, NRR/SRXB  
 
ACCESSION NO.: ML092880519 OFFICE PDI-2/PM NAME REnnis DATE 10/15/2009 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 2008-01 SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-272 AND 50-311


By letters dated April 10, 2008, October 13, 2008, and February 10, 2009 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos. ML081130785, ML082970217, and ML090560529, respectively), PSEG Nuclear LLC (PSEG or the licensee) provided responses to Generic Letter (GL) 2008-01, "Managing Gas Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems" (ADAMS Accession No.
DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 2008-01 SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-272 AND 50-311 By letters dated April 10, 2008, October 13, 2008, and February 10, 2009 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos. ML081130785, ML082970217, and ML090560529, respectively), PSEG Nuclear LLC (PSEG or the licensee) provided responses to Generic Letter (GL) 2008-01, Managing Gas Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems (ADAMS Accession No. ML072910759) for Salem Nuclear Generating Station (Salem), Unit Nos. 1 and 2. Additional information is required for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff to determine that the licensee has acceptably demonstrated that the subject systems are in compliance with the current licensing and design bases and applicable regulatory requirements, and that suitable design, operational, and testing control measures are in place for maintaining this compliance as stated in GL 2008-01.
ML072910759) for Salem Nuclear Generating Station (Salem), Unit Nos. 1 and 2. Additional information is required for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff to determine that the licensee has acceptably demonstrated "that the subject systems are in compliance with the current licensing and design bases and applicable regulatory requirements, and that suitable design, operational, and testing control measures are in place for maintaining this compliance" as stated in GL 2008-01.  


==Background:==
==Background:==


Guidance on NRC staff expectations is provided by Reference 1 which is generally consistent with guidance from the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) provided to the nuclear industry. The NRC staff recommends that the licensee consult Reference 1 when responding to the following request for additional information:
Guidance on NRC staff expectations is provided by Reference 1 which is generally consistent with guidance from the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) provided to the nuclear industry. The NRC staff recommends that the licensee consult Reference 1 when responding to the following request for additional information:
: 1. The GL was intended to address all modes and all operating conditions and it is not limited to events and accidents evaluated in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report.
: 1.     The GL was intended to address all modes and all operating conditions and it is not limited to events and accidents evaluated in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report.
Please confirm that all subject systems are evaluated for all modes and all operating conditions.
Please confirm that all subject systems are evaluated for all modes and all operating conditions.
: 2. Please demonstrate that adequate net positive suction head margin exists when air ingestion effects are considered in the calculations for the residual heat removal, safety injection, and containment spray pumps.
: 2.     Please demonstrate that adequate net positive suction head margin exists when air ingestion effects are considered in the calculations for the residual heat removal, safety injection, and containment spray pumps.
: 3. Please briefly summarize the revised fill and vent procedures with respect to guidance for instrumentation lines. Also briefly discuss the details of any confirmatory testing followed by fill procedures.
: 3.     Please briefly summarize the revised fill and vent procedures with respect to guidance for instrumentation lines. Also briefly discuss the details of any confirmatory testing followed by fill procedures.
: 4. Training was not identified in the GL but it is considered to be a necessary part of applying procedures and other activities when addressing issues identified in the GL.
: 4.     Training was not identified in the GL but it is considered to be a necessary part of applying procedures and other activities when addressing issues identified in the GL.
Please briefly discuss training.  
Please briefly discuss training.


==REFERENCES:==
==REFERENCES:==
: 1. Letter from William H. Ruland (NRC) to James H. Riley (NEI), "Preliminary Assessment of Responses to Generic Letter 2008-01, "Managing Gas Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems," and Future Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff Review Plans", dated May 28, 2009 (ADAMS Accession No. ML091390637).
: 1.     Letter from William H. Ruland (NRC) to James H. Riley (NEI), Preliminary Assessment of Responses to Generic Letter 2008-01, Managing Gas Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems, and Future Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff Review Plans, dated May 28, 2009 (ADAMS Accession No. ML091390637).
Attachment}}
Attachment}}

Latest revision as of 07:48, 12 March 2020

Draft Request for Additional Information
ML092880519
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 10/15/2009
From: Richard Ennis
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Chernoff H
Plant Licensing Branch 1
ENNIS R, NRR/DORL, 415-1453
References
TAC MD7874, TAC MD7875
Download: ML092880519 (3)


Text

October 15, 2009 MEMORANDUM TO: Harold K. Chernoff, Chief Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager /ra/

Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2, DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NOS. MD7874 AND MD7875)

The attached draft request for information (RAI) was transmitted on October 15, 2009, to Mr. Jeff Keenan of PSEG Nuclear LLC (PSEG or the licensee). The draft RAI was transmitted to facilitate the technical review being conducted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and to support a conference call (if needed) with PSEG in order to clarify the licensees submittals dated April 10, 2008, October 13, 2008, and February 10, 2009, in response to Generic Letter 2008-01, Managing Gas Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems for Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The draft questions were sent to ensure that they were understandable, the regulatory basis was clear, and to determine if the information was previously docketed. Additionally, review of the draft RAI would allow PSEG to evaluate and agree upon a schedule to respond to the RAI.

This memorandum and the attachment do not convey or represent an NRC staff position regarding the licensee's submittals.

Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311

Attachment:

Draft RAI

October 15, 2009 MEMORANDUM TO: Harold K. Chernoff, Chief Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager /ra/

Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2, DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NOS. MD7874 AND MD7875)

The attached draft request for information (RAI) was transmitted on October 15, 2009, to Mr. Jeff Keenan of PSEG Nuclear LLC (PSEG or the licensee). The draft RAI was transmitted to facilitate the technical review being conducted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff and to support a conference call (if needed) with PSEG in order to clarify the licensees submittals dated April 10, 2008, October 13, 2008, and February 10, 2009, in response to Generic Letter 2008-01, Managing Gas Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems for Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The draft questions were sent to ensure that they were understandable, the regulatory basis was clear, and to determine if the information was previously docketed. Additionally, review of the draft RAI would allow PSEG to evaluate and agree upon a schedule to respond to the RAI.

This memorandum and the attachment do not convey or represent an NRC staff position regarding the licensee's submittals.

Docket Nos. 50-272 and 50-311

Attachment:

Draft RAI DISTRIBUTION PUBLIC LPL1-2Reading RidsNrrDorlLpl1-2 Resource RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource RidsNrrPMSalem Resource KDesai, NRR/SRXB ACCESSION NO.: ML092880519 OFFICE PDI-2/PM NAME REnnis DATE 10/15/2009 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 2008-01 SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-272 AND 50-311 By letters dated April 10, 2008, October 13, 2008, and February 10, 2009 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos. ML081130785, ML082970217, and ML090560529, respectively), PSEG Nuclear LLC (PSEG or the licensee) provided responses to Generic Letter (GL) 2008-01, Managing Gas Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems (ADAMS Accession No. ML072910759) for Salem Nuclear Generating Station (Salem), Unit Nos. 1 and 2. Additional information is required for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff to determine that the licensee has acceptably demonstrated that the subject systems are in compliance with the current licensing and design bases and applicable regulatory requirements, and that suitable design, operational, and testing control measures are in place for maintaining this compliance as stated in GL 2008-01.

Background:

Guidance on NRC staff expectations is provided by Reference 1 which is generally consistent with guidance from the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) provided to the nuclear industry. The NRC staff recommends that the licensee consult Reference 1 when responding to the following request for additional information:

1. The GL was intended to address all modes and all operating conditions and it is not limited to events and accidents evaluated in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report.

Please confirm that all subject systems are evaluated for all modes and all operating conditions.

2. Please demonstrate that adequate net positive suction head margin exists when air ingestion effects are considered in the calculations for the residual heat removal, safety injection, and containment spray pumps.
3. Please briefly summarize the revised fill and vent procedures with respect to guidance for instrumentation lines. Also briefly discuss the details of any confirmatory testing followed by fill procedures.
4. Training was not identified in the GL but it is considered to be a necessary part of applying procedures and other activities when addressing issues identified in the GL.

Please briefly discuss training.

REFERENCES:

1. Letter from William H. Ruland (NRC) to James H. Riley (NEI), Preliminary Assessment of Responses to Generic Letter 2008-01, Managing Gas Accumulation in Emergency Core Cooling, Decay Heat Removal, and Containment Spray Systems, and Future Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff Review Plans, dated May 28, 2009 (ADAMS Accession No. ML091390637).

Attachment