ML17194A337

E-Mail from Jerry Houff, Zion Solutions to John Hickman, NRC, Dated March 22, 2017, Forwarding TSD-17-003, Rev 0 - Evaluation of Efficiency Calibration Geometries for In-Situ Gamma Spectrometry During FSS

ML17194A337
Person / Time
Site:	Zion  File:ZionSolutions icon.png
Issue date:	03/22/2017
From:	Houff J ZionSolutions
To:	John Hickman, Vaaler M Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
References
TSD-17-003, Rev 0
Download: ML17194A337 (49)

Text

Hickman, John From: Jerry X. Houff <jxhouff@energysolutions.com >

Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:26 AM To: Hickman, John; Vaaler, Marlayna Cc: Nick Williams

Subject:

[External_Sender] NRC Submittal Documents Attachments: TSD-17-003 Rev 0 - Evaluation of Efficiency Calibration Geometries for In -Situ Gamma Spectrometry During FSS.pdf John, Second Document for 1300 meeting.

Jerry Houff ZionSolutions Licensing Manager jxhouff@enrgysolutions .com Work Phone (224)789-4090 Cell Phone (860)608-6408 1

ZionSolutions, Inc.

Technical Support Document TSD 17-003 Evaluation of Efficiency Calibration Geometries for In-Situ Gamma Spectrometry During Final Status Surveys Revision 0 f4L 1fL,Juk_

Originator: _ _(_ kff

_!!i

__ j ________ Date: 21-Mar-17 Pete Hollenbeck Reviewer: ----1.~,.--=-1<L--=--~

-*-=--=-o--~---:::::>--

_ _-_ _ _ Date: 21-Mar-1 7 Eric Darois Approval: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date: _ _ _ _ _ __

Robert Yetter

DOD ITIIlIJ ROD [

DODD ODDO[

Summary of Changes in this Revision :

• Rev. 0 - Initial issuance.

ODD CIIJDOO R DD [

00000000[

Table of Contents I. PURPOSE ...... ...... ............. .. ..... ... .. ...... .. ....... ........................... .... .. .. ....... .. ..... ... ................. ........ 4

2. DISC US S ION .... ...... ... ........... ....................................... ... .. .. ... .... ......... .......... ... ... ..... ............ .. ..4

3. E FFIC IENC Y EVALU ATIONS ..... ..... ................. ...... .... ... .... .... .. ................... ... ............... ....... 6

3. 1. Ex ponenti al Ci rcul ar Plane Model .... .. ...................... .. ........ ...... ..... ......... .... .. .. .. ........ .. .. 6 3.2. Non-uniform Surfaces ......... ..... ......... ...... .............. .. ........................... ........... .............. 10

4. CONCLUS ION S .... ......... .. ... .. ..... .............................. .................. .... ............... ... .. ...... ............. 12

5. REFEREN CES .................. .. ... .... ..... ....... ......... ...... .. ......... .... ..... .. .... .... ...... ... ... ... .... ............ .... 12

6. ATTAC HM ENTS ............ ................. ... .. ...... ...................................... ... ...... ....... .... ... .... ......... . 12 List of Tables Table I - Survey Areas with Pre-established !SOCS Geometry Models ....................................... 4 Table 2 - EC P Mode l Compari sons ........ .... ....................... ........................... .. ... ...... ................ ... .. I 0 Table 3 - 2.54cm C P Model Efficien cy Compari son .. .................... ..... ....... .. ....... ......... .... .. .. ..... .. 11 Table 4 - I .27cm C P Model Efficienc y Compari son ................................ ......... ........ .......... .. .... ... 11 Table 5 - 3 Meter EC P Model Effici ency Compari son .................................. ... ... ............ ....... .. ... 11 Table 6 - 3 Meter Minus I Foot ECP Model Effi ciency Comparison ... .. ........ .. .. ................ .. ...... 11 Table 7 - Two Di stan ces EC P Model Effi ciency Compari son ..................................... ... .... ... .. .... 12 List of Figures Figure I - A ll Sampl e Data .... ................ ........................................... .. .. .. .... .. .... ............ .. .. .. ........... 7 Figure 2 - A ll Sampl e Data Without Top Inch .......... ....................... ........ .. ..................... .... ........... 8 Figure 3 - All Sampl e Data Without Top Two Inches ................................. .................................. 9

DOD [[]]]]]] Rrn [

ornoornoc

1. PURPOSE The purpose of this Technical Support Document (TSO) is summarize the evaluations performed to address the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) Request for Additional Information (RAI) on how a surveyor will determine ifthe geometry of remaining residual radioactivity is significantly different from that which was assumed in TSO 14-022.

A review of the recommendations in TS D 14-022 shows that only four areas have the geometry template for final surveys established. The geometry definitions, as provided in Table I, use variables contained in the ISOCS Geometry Composer defined as:

ECP Model: Ex ponential Circular Plane geometry, where DRL is the relaxation length for the exponential distribution ; the depth at which the activity concentration falls by a factor of 1/e from DMAX , and DMAX is the depth at which the maximum activity concentration occurs.

C P Model : C ircular Plane Model where the depth profile can be set for various distributions (including linear) and a discrete depth.

Table 1 - Survey Areas with Pre-established ISOCS Geometry Models Location Status ECP model with DRL = 2.75cm, Auxiliary Basement DMAX = Ocm and source depth of Floor 5.8cm CP model set for liner with a source Containment Basement thickness of O. I 53cm.

Turbine Building and model set - CP with 2.54cm total main steam tunnels depth Crib House, Forebay, model set - CP with I .27cm total and Circulating Water depth Intake Pipes The remaining areas have recommendations to characterize when they become accessible and available.

Evaluations of the effects of remediation to the Auxiliary Building basement concrete depth profile in the Exponential Circular Plane (ECP) model and the of non-uniform surfaces are presented below.

2. DISCUSSION The NRC provided the following RAI to Zion:

The previous HP RAJ 6 comments (as provided to the licensee in May 2016) note that there is an apparent discrepancy between recommendations from the licensee's TSD 022 (Revision 0) document and the LTP with regard to additional core sampling to validate the limited core data currently available or to provide new data in areas that are

ODD ITIIIIIJ R ITJ [

DITJD D ITJD[

considered to have a unique operational history or contamination profile. The licensee's response, as provided in July 2016, indicates that such core samples may not be taken and that the necessity to validate the geometry for ISOCs efficiency calibration is addressed as Step 4.2.7 of ZS-LT-300-001-001 (Revision 2), "FRS Package Development." This procedure simply directs the surveyor to "review post remediation conditions and surveys to determine if the geometry ofremaining residual radioactivity has significantly changed from that assumed in TSD 14-022," and that "if the geometry appears to be significantly different from that which was assumed in TSD 14-022, then inform the C/LT Manager."

There appears to be no definition or procedure to direct the surveyor in making this assessment or a description of what constitutes a significant change from assumptions.

As such, the proposed approach does not provide an adequate justification as to why the core samples recommended by TSD 14-022 may not be necessary. Details on the methods and procedures the STS surveyor will follow to assess differences in geometry should be provided.

It is additionally important that the NRC understand the usage of core samples on a per survey unit basis, and details on the !SOCS geometry utilized within a survey unit should be presented in any Final Status Survey Report (FSSR) provided to the NRC.

Zion provided the following response:

There are two aspects of the concrete geometry that will be reviewed during FSS design to determine if there are significant differences from the Exponential Circular Plane (ECP) geometry selected in TSO 14-022 to perform the efficiency calibration for general areas. As listed in TSO 14-014, section 7, there are four areas that required further characterization to confirm that the ECP applies or, if a different geometry should be used for the efficiency calibration. There are two geometry considerations; I) the uniformity, or smoothness of the surface, and 2) the distribution of contamination with depth. The ECP efficiency calibration assumes a smooth surface. This assumption will be used if remediation does not result causing significant non-uniformities in the concrete surface, such as trenches, deep gouges, etc. that would produce a "wall edge", which causes significant photon shielding between the source at the bottom of the trench or gouge and the ISOCS detector. An assessment will be performed using the !SOCS geometry composer to determine a set of measurable parameters for the engineer to apply in the field to assess ifthe surface geometry is significantly different from the ECP assumption of smooth surface. The parameters will be added to the Procedure ZS-LT-300-001-00 I (Revision 2), "FRS Package Development". A standard acceptance criteria for instrument variability applied to source checks is +/- 20%. A lower value of I 0% will be applied in setting the parameters for designating a remediated area as non-uniform.

The I 0% criterion will apply to the difference between the efficiency values for the non-uniform geometry and the efficiency values for the ECP geometry. If the efficiency value for the non-uniform geometry is more than I 0% lower than the ECP geometry, then an area-specific efficiency calibration geometry will be applied to the affected area. A description of the condition of the surfaces measured by !SOCS during FSS, and the geometry applied for the efficiency calibration in the affected area will be described in

DOD ITilIJOO ROD [

00000000[

the FSS Final Report. The second geometry consideration is the distribution of contamination with depth . During survey qesign, the cores collected from the areas recommended in TSO 14-022 will be reviewed. The actual measured values in the new cores, the 0.5 inch core slices, will be used in the ISOCS geometry composer directl y to determine the actual efficiency based on the core data. The differences between actual efficiency and the ECP efficiency will be evaluated. As for the assessment of surface uniformity, if the efficiency based on core data is more than I 0% lower than the ECP efficiency, the core data will be used as the basis for the efficiency calibration in the affected area. A desc ription of the core assessment and the geometry applied for the efficiency calibration in the affected area will be described in the FSS Final Report.

Procedure ZS-LT-300-001-00 I will be updated to include the parameters for evaluating uniformity and the contamination depth profile after the parameters for determining when a surface is " non-uniform" have been selected. The assessment performed to select the parameters will be documented in a TSO along with the process for evaluating the depth profile efficiency using new cores. The TSO and revised procedure will be provided to NRC when completed.

3. EFFICIENCY EVALUATIONS 3.1. Exponential Circular Plane Model The first step in the evaluation was to use the depth and activity data from Table 2 in TSO 14-022 and re-produce the analysis. Figure I presents the graphical analysis of the

• Table 2 data. The red curve is a plot of the All Core Sample Average Source Term data in (Ci) vs sample depth. Each core was sliced into 0.5 inch thick pucks. The average source term value was assigned to the depth of half the puck thickness. The 2. 75cm DRL curve was calculated by the following equation:

A= A0 e

-x;L Where A = activity at depth x Ao= Cmax = 0.247 Ci from Table 2 in TSO 14-022 L = DRL = 2.75cm X = depth in cm

DOD ITilIIlJ R DD [

DODD ODDO[

Figure 1 - All Sample Data All Samples Average Source Term (Ci) 3.00E-01 2.SOE -01 All data exp fit equation: y = 0.247e o.304x

-Q 2.00E-01 R2 = 0.9188

...E Q)

I- l .SOE-01 Q)

...u:::s 0

Vl l.OOE-01 5.00E-02 O.OOE+OO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 ,.... 0 0 0 0 Cl Cl 0 0 0 0 Cl 0

..... -<i ,.... ci ..... rn -<i ..... ID ,....

N rn <.D 00

..... ..... <.D 00

..... ci rn

"'" oci U") CJ'\ U") CJ'\

..... ..... N..... ..... ..... ..... ..... N N N

N N N U")

N N N N Depth (cm)

~ Se n esl - Ser1es.2 * * * * * * * *

• f)(pon. {Seriesl)

This graph is in agreement with the graph presented in TSO 14-022 and shows that the 2.75cm Depth of the Relaxation Length (DRL) curve is a much better fit to the data than the exponential curve calculated by Excel.

The next steps were to remove the data from the top two layers (I inch) and the top 4 layers (2 inches) to represent the results from remediation. These evaluations were performed to determine if any limited remediation would change the geometry and efficiencies of the ECP model. After removing the activity data, the depths were re-set represent the top layers. Figures 2 and 3 present the graphical analysis of the effects of removal of the top inch and top 2 inches, respectively.

DOD ITIIIIIJ R DD [

00000 000[

Figure 2 - All Sample Data Without Top Inch Samples w/o Top 1" Average Source Term (Ci) 6.00E-02 5.00E-02 Q

4.00E -02 Sa mple data exponential fit : y = 0.0505e--0 144*

R2 =0.9864 E...

Qj I- 3.00E-02 Qj u

I 0

VI 2.00E -02 l.OOE-02

0. 00 E+OO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Depth (cm)

__._ Seriesl - - e - 5eries2 ********* Expon . (Seriesl)

DOD ITililJ ROD [

DODOO ODD[

Figure 3 - All Sample Data Without Top Two Inches Samples w/o Top 2" Average Sou rce Term (Ci) 2.50E-02 2.00E-02 Sample data exponential fit: y = 0.023e o. is<x R2 =0.9896

-Q E l.50E -02

<11 1-(11

...v

J l.OOE-02 0

VI 5.00E-03 O.OOE+OO 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Depth (cm)

~ Samp l es w/o top 2" Average Source Term (Ci)

~ 2.75cm DRL data

• • • • • • • • • Expon. (Samples w/o top 2" Average Source Term (Ci))

Both Figures 2 and 3 have the same 2.75cm DRL curve as shown on Figure 1 and the Excel exponential fitted curve of the data. Review of Figures 2 and 3 shows that the 2.75cm DRL curve is not the best fit of the data. The Excel exponential curve is the better fit of the data.

The original analysis of a ll the data chose the source depth to be equal to approximately 90% of the cumulative activity. This depth is 5.8cm and based upon the 2.75cm DRL curve. Usi ng the same criteria on the exponential curves in Figures 2 and 3 results in a source depth of 9.5cm with the top 1 inch removed and 12.1 cm with the top 2 inches removed .

The DRL depth is equal to the depth when the maximum activity has been reduced by a factor of 1/e, equal to 0.368. The DRL value for a ll the data is 2. 75cm. The calculated DRL value, based upon the exponentia l curves, is 4.1 Ocm for data with the top inch removed and 5.43cm for the data with the top 2 inches removed .

DOD DJilIJ R rn C DDITJ DD ITJDC Table 2 presents a summary of the ECP model evaluations.

Table 2 - ECP Model Comparisons Source Dmax DRL Core Data thickness (cm) (cm)

(cm) all (from TSD 14-022) 5.8 0 2.75 minus top 1" 9.5 0 4.10 minus top 2" 12. 1 0 5.43 Review of the Table 2 data shows that removal of the top inch of concrete increases the source thickness from 5.8cm to 9.5cm. This increase is a factor of 1.6 from the un-remediated thickness. Removal of the top inch of concrete increases the DRL from 2.75cm to 4.1 Ocm. This increase is a factor of 1.5 from the un-remediated length. These evaluations show that any remediation of the Aux Bldg basement floor will result in a change to the ECP model presented in TSD 14-022. The post-remediation conditions need to be evaluated and a revised ECP model created. There is sufficient characterization data, so additional cores are not needed . All data used in these evaluations is presented in Attachment I.

3.2. Non-uniform Surfaces Prior to performing the Final Status Survey of a concrete basement floor, remediation may need to be performed. This remediation could include hot spot removal or reduction, removal of a drain line or removal of a surface layer. These remediations may create a non-uniform surface. This evaluation assumes that hot spot remediation and drain pipe removal will result in a gouge or hole or trench of up to I foot in depth. The area of these remediations will also be assumed to be small when compared to the 28.3 m 2 Field of View (FOY) for each measurement; however, that is not a condition for the evaluations. The purpose of these evaluations is to examine the effect of placing the detector at a distance of 3 meters minus I foot (2.6952 meters) from the average level of the surface to compensate for the non-uniformity, hole or trench but using the 3-meter distance efficiencies to analyze the spectrums. In this geometry, most of the surface being measured will be closer to the detector than the hole or trench.

The parameters from Zion !SOCS detector SIN 5456 was used to perform the evaluations. Two geometries were created for each evaluation; a detector to surface distance of3 meters and a distance of 3 meters minus I foot. These geometries were created for a 2.54cm contamination layer and I .27cm contamination layer with a CP geometry and for the three ECP geometries described in Section 3.1.

The efficiencies for the Cs-137 and Co-60 gamma energies were recorded for both distances in each geometry and compared. The Geometry Composer reports for the CP geometries and gamma efficiencies are presented in Attachment 2. The Geometry

DOD CTIJIIlJ R OJ [

DOJDOJOJD[

Composer reports for the EC P geometri es and gamma efficienc ies are presented in .

Tab le 3 presents a compariso n of the 2.54cm C P geometry efficienc ies.

Table 3 - 2.54cm CP Model Efficiency Comparison 3m 3m-lft Ratio Energy results res ults 3m-lft/

(KeV)

(c/y) (c/y) 3m 66 1.65 2.85 E-06 3. lO E-06 1.09 1173 .22 2.24E-06 2.43 E-06 1.08 1332.49 2. 12 E-06 2.30 E-06 1.08 Table 4 presents a comparison of the I .27cm CP geometry efficiencies.

Table 4 - 1.27cm CP Model Efficiency Comparison 3m 3m-lft Ratio Energy res ults results 3m-lft/

(KeV)

(c/y) (c/y) 3m 661.65 3.25 E-06 3.53E-06 1.09 11 73.22 2.47 E-06 2. 68 E-06 1.09 1332.49 2.32E-06 2. 53E-06 1.09 Table 5 presents a comparison of the 3 meter EC P geometry effic iencies.

Table 5 - 3 Meter ECP Model Efficiency Comparison Ratio Ratio Energy All Data w/o top 1" w/o top all/minus all/minu s (KeV) (c/y) (c/y) 2" (c/y) top 1" top 2" 66 1.65 2.50E-06 2.09 E-06 1.84E-06 1.20 1.36 11 73 .22 2.02 E-06 1.74 E-06 1.57 E-06 1. 16 1.29 1332.49 l. 92E-06 1.67E-06 1.5 1E-06 1.1 5 1.28 Tab le 6 presents a com parison of the 3 meter mi nus I foot ECP geometry efficiencies.

Table 6 - 3 Meter Minus 1 Foot ECP Model Efficiency Comparison Ratio Ratio Energy All Data w/o top 1" w/o top all/minus all/minus (KeV) (c/y) (c/y) 2" (c/y) top 1" top 2" 66 1.65 2.70E-06 2.27 E-06 2.0 1E-06 1. 19 1.34 1173.22 2.1 7E-06 l .88E-06 1.70 E-06 1.15 1.28 1332.49 2.07 E-06 1.8 1E-06 1.63E-06 1.14 1.26

DOD IIIIIIIJ R DD [

DODD DD ODD[

Table 7 presents a compari son of the 3 meter and 3 meter minus I foot distance EC P geometry efficiencies.

Table 7 - Two Distances ECP Model Efficiency Comparison All Data W/OTop W/O Top Energy Ratio 1" Ratio 2" Ratio (KeV) 3m-1I3m 3m-1 I 3m 3m-1I3m 661.65 1.08 1.09 1.09 1173.22 1.07 1.08 1.08 1332.49 1.07 1.08 1.08 Review of the data in Tables 3, 4 and 7 show that using the 3 meter efficiencies with the detector at 3 meters minus I foot distance, wi ll produce an approximately 7% to 9%

conservative values for Cs-1 37 and Co-60.

Review of the data in Table 5 show that the Cs- 13 7 and Co-60 gamma effic iencies range from 15% to 20% higher for the EC P model w ith all the data than the corresponding val ues fo r the top I inch removed . This is a significant change in th e efficiency.

Review of th e data in Table 6 show that the Cs-137 and Co-60 gamma effic iencies range from 14% to 19% higher for the EC P model with all the data than the corresponding values for the top I inch removed.

4. CONCLUSIONS I. Any remediation of a concrete surface after ana lys is of the co ncrete core data has been completed wi ll require re-evaluation of the ISOCS geometry model and data and/or collection of additi onal core data.

2. For non-uniform surfaces with gouges, pits or trenches up to I foot in depth can be conservatively evaluated by pl aci ng the detector at a di stance of 3 meters minus I foot (2.7 meters) and using the 3 meter effici encies . Di stances deeper than I foot should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

5. REFERENCES I. Zion Reacto r License Termination Plan Rev ision I.

2. Zion TSO 14-022, "Use of In-Situ Gam ma Spectroscopy fo r Source Term Survey of End State Structures", Revision 0.

6. ATTACHMENTS Attachment I --'- Ex ponenti al C ircular Plane Data - No n-uni form Surface Efficienci es with C P Model - Non-uniform Surface Effic ienci es with the ECP Model

ODD ITilIIlJ ROD [

000000000[ Exponential Circular Plane Data

DOD ITilDOJ R CD [

ornooornoc All Samples Average cumulative Exp fit cumulative 2.75cm DRL %of 1 cumulative Depth cm  % of total  % of total I Source Term  % data  % data total  %

(Ci) 0.635 2.47E-01 45 .96% 45.96% 2.04E-01 32 .03% 32.03% l.96E-01 36.99% 36.99%

1.905 l.14E-01 21 .21% 67 .17% 1.38E-01 21.77% 53 .80% l.24E-01 23 .31% 60.29%

3.175 5.05E-02 9.40% 76.56% 9.41E-02 14.80% 68.60% 7.79E-02 14.69% I 74.98%

4.445 2.85E-02 5.30% 81 .86% 6.40E-02 10.06% 78.66% 4 .91E-02 9 .25% 84.23%

5.715 2.30E-02 4 .28% 86.14% 4.35E-02 6.84% I 85.49% 3.09E-02 5.83% 90.07%

6.985 l.65E-02 3.07% 89.21% 2.95E-02 4 .65% 90.14% l .95E-02 3.67% 93.74%

8.255 l.14E-02 2.12% 91.33% 2.0lE-02 3.16% 93 .30% l .23E-02 2.32% 96.06%

9.525 l.25E-02 2.33% 93 .66% l .37E-02 2.15% 95.45% 7.73E-03 1.46% 97.51%

10.795 4 .86E-03 0 .90% 94.56% 9.28E-03 1.46% I 96.90% 4 .87E-03 0.92% 98.43%

12.065 8.85E-03 1.65% 96.21% 6.31E-03 0 .99% 97 .90% 3.07E-03 0.58% 99 .01%

13.335 4 .llE-03 0 .76% 96.98% 4.29E-03 0.67% 98.57% 1.94E-03 0 .37% 99.38%

I 14.605 3.26E-03 0 .61% 97.58% 2.91E-03 0.46% 99.03% l .22E-03 0.23% 99.61%

15.875 2.60E-03 0.48% 98.07% l.98E-03 0.31% 99.34% 7.68E-04 0 .14% 99.75%

17.145 2.09E-03 0 .39% 98.45% l.35E-03 0 .2 1% 99.55% 4.84E-04 0.09% 99.84%

18.415 l .68E-03 0 .31% 9.15E-04 0.14% I 3.05E-04 0.06% I 19.685 l .35E-03 0.25% 6.22E-04 0.10% I l.92E-04 0.04%

20.955 l .09E-03 0 .20% 4 .23E-04 0.07% l. 21E-04 0.02%

22.22 5 8.82E-04 0.16% 2.87E-04 0.05% 7,63E-05 0.01%

23.495 7.15E-04 0.13% l.95E-04 0.03% 4 .81E-05 0.01%

24.765 5 .74E-04 0 .11% 1.33E-04 0.02% 3.03E-05 0.01%

26.035 4 .65E-04 0.09% 9.02E-05 0.01% l .91E-05 0.00%

27 .305 . 3.77E-04 0.07% 6.13E-05 0.01% l.20E-05 0.00%

28.575 3.06E-04 0.06% 4.17E-05 0.01% 7.59E-06 0.00%

29.845 2.50E-04 0.05% 2.83E-05 0.00% 4 .78E-06 0.00%

31.115 2.03E-04 0.04% l.93E-05 0.00% 3.0lE-06 0.00%

32.385 l.65E-04 0.03% 1.31E-05 0.00% 1.90E-06 0.00%

33 .655 l.36E-04 0.03% 8.90E-06 0.00% l.20E-06 0.00%

34.925 l.llE-04 0.02% 6.05E-06 0.00% 7.54E-07 0.00%

5.37E-01 100.00% 6.36E-01 100.00% 5.30E-01 100.00%

DOD ITillDD R DD [

DDDDDDDDD[

Samples w/o top 1" cumulative Exp fit cumulative 2.75cm DRL %of cumulative Depth cm Average  % of total  % of total

% data  % data total  %

Source Term (Ci) 0.635 5.0SE-02 28.59% 28.59% 4.33E-02 26.65% 26.65% 4.0lE-02 36.99% 36.99%

1.905 2.85E-02 16.14% 44.73% 3.17E-02 19.55% 46.20% 2.53E-02 23.31% 60.29%

3.175 2.30E-02 13.02% 57.75% 2.33E-02 14.34% 60.54% l.59E-02 14.69% 74.98%

4.445 1.65E-02 9.34% 67.09% 1. 71E-02 10.52% 71.06% l.OOE-02 9.25% 84.23%

5.715 1.14E-02 6.45% 73 .54% l.25E-02 7.72% 78 .78% 6.32E-03 5.83% 90.07%

6.985 1.25E-02 7.08% 80.62% 9.19E-03 5.66% 84.44% 3.98E-03 3.67% 93.74%

8.255 4.86E-03 2.75% 83.37% 6.74E-03 4.15% 88.59% 2.51E-03 2.32% 96.06%

9.525 8.85E-03 5.01% I 88.38% 4 .94E-03 3.05% 91.63% l.58E -03 1.46% 97.51%

10.795 12.065 4.llE-03 3.26E-03 2.33%

1.85%

I 90.71%

92 .55%

3.63E-03 2.66E-03 2.23%

1.64%

93.87%

95 .51%

9.97E-04 6.28E-04 t 0.92%

0.58%

98.43%

99 .01%

13.335 2.60E-03 1.47% 94.03% l.95E-03 1.20% 96.71% 3.96E-04 0.37% 99 .38%

14.605 2.09E-03 1.18% 95 .21% l.43E-03 0.88% 97.59% 2.49E-04 0.23% 99 .61%

15.875 1.68E-03 0.95% 96.16% l.05E -03 0.65% 98.24% l.57E -04 0.14% 99.75%

17.145 1.35E-03 0.76% ~

96.92% 7.70E-04 0.47% 98.71% 9.90E-05 0.09% 99 .84%

I 18.415 l.09E-03 0.62% 5.65E-04 0.35% 6.24E-05 0.06%

19.685 8.82E-04 0.50% 4.14E-04 0.26% 3.93E-05 0.04%

20.955 7.lSE-04 0.40% 3.04E-04 0 .19% 2.48E-05 0.02%

22.225 S.74E-04 0.32% 2.23 E-04 0.14% l .56E-05 0 .01%

23.495 4.65E-04 0.26% l.64E -04 0.10% 9.84E-06 0.01%

+

24.765 3.77E-04 0.21% l.20E-04 0.07% 6.20E-06 0 .01%

26.035 3.06E-04 0.17% 8.80E-05 0.05% 3.91E-06 0.00%

27.305 2.SOE-04 0.14% 6.45E-05 0.04% 2.46E-06 I 0.00%

28.575 2.03E-04 0.11% 4.73E-05 0.03% l .55E-06 0.00%

29.845 1.6SE-04 0.09% 3.47E-05 0.02% 9.77E-07 0.00%

31.115 1.36E-04 0.08% 2.55E-05 0.02% 6.16E-07 0 .00%

32 .385 1.llE-04 0.06% l.87E -05 0.01% 3.88E-07 0.00%

33 .655 8.71E-05 0.05% l .37E-05 0.01% 2.45E-07 0.00%

34.925 7.08E-05 0.04% l .OlE-05 0.01% l.54E-07 0.00%

1.77E-01 100.00% 1.62E-01 100.00% 1.0SE-01 100.00%

ODD [DJIIIJ ROD [

000000000[

Samples w/o top 2"

%of cumulative Exp fit %of cumulative 2.75cm %of cumulative Depth cm Average total  % data total  % DRL data total  %

Source Term

{Ci) 0.635 2.30E-02 23 .56% 23.56% 2.05E-02 20.89% 20.89% l.83E-02 36.99% 36.99%

1.905 l .6SE-02 16.90% 40.46% l.62E-02 16.53% 37.42% l.15E-02 23 .31% 60.29%

3.175 l.14E-02 11.68% 52 .13% l.28E-02 13.09% 50.51% 7.25E-03 14.69% 74.98%

4.445 l. 2SE-02 12.80% 64.94% l.02E-02 10.36% 60.87% 4.57E-03 9.25% 84.23%

5.715 4.86E-03 4 .98% 69 .92% 8.04E-03 8.20% 69 .07% 2.88E-03 5.83% 90.07%

6.985 8.85E-03 9.06% 78 .98% 6.36E-03 6.49% 75 .57% l.81E-03 3.67% 93 .74%

8 .2 55 4.llE-03 4 .21% 83.19% 5.04E-03 5.14% 80.71% l.14E-03 2.32% 96.06%

9.52 5 3.26E-03 3.34% 86.53% 3.99E-03 4.07% 84.77% 7. 20E-04 1.46% 97.51%

10.795 2.60E-03 2.66% 89 .19% 3.16E-03 3.22% 87.99% 4.54E-04 0.92% 98.43%

12.065 2.09E-03 2.14% 91.33% 2.50E-03 2.55% I 90.54% 2.86E-04 0.58% 99.01%

13.335 l.68E-03 1.72% 93. 05% l.98E-03 2.02% 92.56% l.80E-04 0.37% 99.38%

14.605 l.3SE-03 1.38% 94.44% l .57E-03 1.60% 94.16% l.14E-04 0.23% 99.61%

15.875 l.09E-03 1.12% 95. 55% 1. 24E-03 1. 26% 95.43% 7.16E-05 0.14% 99.75%

17.145 8.82E-04 0.90% 96.46% 9.81E-04 1.00% I 96.43% 4.51E-05 0.09% 99 .84%

18.4 15 7.lSE-04 0.73% 97.19% I 7.77E-04 0.79% 97 .22% 2.84E-05 0.06% 99.90%

19.685 5.74E-04 0.59% 97.78% 6.15E-04 0.63% 97 .85% l.79E-05 0.04% 99 .94%

20.955 4.6SE-04 0.48% 98.25% 4.87E-04 0.50% 98.34% l.13E-05 0.02% 99 .96%

22 .225 3.77 E-04 0.39% 3.85E-04 7.llE-06 23.495 3.06E-04 0.31% 3.05E-04 4.48E-06 24.765 2.SOE-04 0.26% 2.41E-04 2. 82E-06 26.035 2.03E-04 0.21% l.91E-04 I l.78E-06 27.305 l.6SE-04 0.17% l.51E-04 l.1 2 E-06 28.575 l.36E-04 0.14% l.20E-04 7.06E-07 29.845 l.llE-04 0.11% 9.48E-05 4.45E-07 31.115 8.71E-OS 0.09% 7.50E-05 2.80E-07 32.385 7.08E-OS 0.07% 5.94E-05 I l.77E-07 9.76E-02 100.00% 9.SOE-02 4.94E-02

DOD ITIJIIIJ R DD [

DODD DD DOD[ Non-uniform Surface Efficiencies with CP Model

OD~ RDDC Geometry Composer Report CJJmfEl~A Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 09:28 :12

==

Description:==

Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete Comment: 1 layer equal to 2.54 cm depth File Name: C: \ GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\CIRCULAR_PLANE\Zion 2.54cm concrete.geo Software: I SOCS Template: CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version : (default)

Detector: 5456 Collimator: 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole colli mator])

Environment: Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00% , MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (cm)

No. Delatptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.5 d.I Matierllll Denllty Rel.Cone.

1 Side Walls 0 600 none 2 Layer 1 2.54 concret e 2. 3 1.00 3 Layer 2 0 < none>

4 Layer 3 0 < none>

5 Layer 4 0 < none>

6 Layer 5 0 < none>

7 Layer 6 0 < none>

8 Layer 7 0 < none>

9 Layer 8 0 < none>

10 Layer 9 0 < none>

11 Layer 10 0 < none>

12 Absorberl 13 Absorber2 14 Source-Detector 300 0 0 0 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 88.0 122.1 165.9 391. 7 661.7 898.0 1173 .2 1332.5 1836.0 I r. ~*~1 11.:.R PI Al*I ~

-4 r / /

[(

Page 1 of 2

Geometry Composer Report Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 09:28 :12

==

Description:==

Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete Comment: 1 layer equal to 2.54 cm depth File Name: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\CIRCULAR_PLANE\ Zion 2.54cm concrete.geo Software: I SOCS Template: CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)

Page 2 of 2

DD~ RDDC Geometry Composer Report CJ.tfNffj~A Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 09:19:13

==

Description:==

Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete = 3m -1 foot Comment: 1 layer equal to 2.54 cm depth File Name: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\CIRCULAR_PLANE\Zion 2.54cm concrete-1 foot.gee Software: I SOCS Template: CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)

Detector: 5456 Collimator: 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole collimator])

Environment: Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%

Integration: Convergence= 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (cm)

No. n.atptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.5 d.I Malllrlal Denllty Rel.Cone.

1 Side Walls 0 600 none 2 Layer 1 2.54 concrete 2.3 1.00 3 Layer 2 0 < none>

4 Layer 3 0 < none>

5 Layer 4 0 < none>

6 Layer 5 0 < none >

7 Layer 6 0 < none>

8 Layer 7 0 < none>

9 Layer 8 0 < none>

10 Layer 9 0 <none>

11 Layer 10 0 < none>

12 Absorber !

13 Absorber2 14 Source-Detector 269.52 0 0 0 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 88.0 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 898.0 1173.2 1332.5 1836.0 Page 1of2

DD~ RDDC Geometry Composer Report CJ~rei~A Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 09:19 :13

==

Description:==

Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete = 3m -1 foot Comment: 1 layer equal to 2.54 cm depth File Name: C: \GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\CIRCULAR_PLANE\Zion 2.54cm concrete-1 foot.gee Software: I SOCS Template: CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) v z . **. '* )(

Page 2 of 2

ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS DOD ornmo R OD [

ISOCS/LabSOCS File : C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\CIRCULAR ~'t\lftlSn 2 . :

ISOCS /LabSOCS Time: 03/14/17 09 : 28 : 04 -

Template : CIRCULAR PLANE Geom

Description:

Zion 2 . 54cm Comment : Zion 2 . 54cm Detector: 5456 Coll imat or : 50MM- 90D NEW Convergence : 1 . 00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 2 . 8274e+001 (C)

Mass [Grams]: l . 6877e+006 (C)

Length [Meters] : not us ed (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U ) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %U ncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 59 . 54 3 .7 5877e - 006 10 . 0 -0 . 426258 1628 88 .0 3 5 . 08373e-006 10.0 - 0 . 473965 1628 122 . 06 5 . 27 1 70e - 006 10 . 0 - 0 . 540782 1628 165 . 85 5 . 07193e-006 8.0 - 0 . 578253 1628 391 . 69 3 . 57881e - 006 8.0 -0.521853 1628 66 1.65 2 . 84879e-006 6. 0 -0.502048 1628 898 . 02 2 . 51718e-006 6.0 -0 . 470993 1628 1173 . 22 2 . 23913e-006 4.0 - 0 . 442835 1628 1332 . 49 2 . 12014e - 006 4.0 -0.42099 1 1628 1836 . 01 l . 78650e - 006 4.0 - 0.386185 1628

ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ODO DOJIIIJ R DD C ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\CIRCULAR ~~~+.Jl.~L.0.-~' 2.:

ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 03/14/17 09:19 : 08 Template: CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description : Zion 2 . 54cm-lft Comment: Zion 2.54cm-lft Detector: 5456 Collimator : 50MM-90D NEW Convergence : 1 . 00 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 2 . 8274e+001 (C )

Mass [Grams] : 1 . 6877e+006 (C)

Length [Meters] : not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 59 . 54 4.18018e-006 10 . 0 -0 . 223797 17556 88.03 5.66 1 38e-006 10.0 -0 . 182341 17556 122 . 06 5.8764le-006 10.0 -0.181125 17556 165 . 85 5.62460e-006 8.0 -0 . 187260 17556 391.69 3 . 91979e-006 8.0 -0 . 225971 17556 661.65 3.10172e-006 6.0 -0 . 247587 17556 898 . 02 2.73366e-006 6.0 -0 . 255239 17556 1173.22 2.42873e-006 4.0 -0.259371 17556 1332.49 2.29857e-006 4.0 - 0.258321 17556 1836 . 01 l.93545e-006 4.0 -0.259668 17556

Geometry Composer Report Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 09 :13:12

==

Description:==

Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete Comment: 1 layer equal to 1.27 cm depth File Name: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\CIRCULAR_PLANE\Zion l.27cm concrete.geo Software: I SOCS Template: CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)

Detector: 5456 Collimator: 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole collimator])

Environment: Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (cm) d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.S d.I

~*

No. Dela'lptlon DM8lty Rel.Cone:.

1 Side Walls 0 600 none 2 Layer 1 1.27 concrete 2.3 1.00 3 Layer 2 0 <none>

4 Layer 3 0 <none>

5 Layer 4 0 <none >

6 Layer 5 0 < none>

7 Layer 6 0 < none>

8 Layer 7 0 < none>

9 Layer 8 0 < none>

10 Layer 9 0 < none>

11 Layer 10 0 < none >

12 Absorberl 13 Absorber2 14 Source-Detector 300 0 0 0 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 88.0 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 898.0 1173.2 1332.5 1836.0 I (.~*"".I JI :.R Pl AIF

.~

Page 1of2

oor:Arm Rooc Geometry Composer Report CJ~lfj~ A Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 09 :13 :12

==

Description:==

Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete Comment: 1 layer equal to 1.27 cm depth File Name: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\CIRCULAR_PLANE\Zion l.27cm concrete.geo Software: I SOCS Template: CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) y z * ..... >:

Page 2 of 2

Geometry Composer Report Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 09:10:45

==

Description:==

Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete = 3m - 1 foot Comment: 1 layer equal to 1.27 cm depth File Name: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\CIRCULAR_PLANE\Zion 1.27cm concrete-1 foot.geo Software: !SOCS Template: CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version : (default)

Detector: 5456 Collimator: 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole collimator])

Environment: Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (cm)

No. Delatptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.S d.I Mlltlertal Denllty bl.Cone.

1 Side Walls 0 600 none 2 Layer 1 1.27 concrete 2.3 1.00 3 Layer 2

• 0 < none >

4 Layer 3 0 < none >

5 Layer 4 0 < none >

6 Layer 5 0 < none >

7 Layer 6 0 < none >

8 Layer 7 0 < none>

9 Layer 8 0 < none >

10 Layer 9 0 < none >

11 Layer 10 0 < none>

12 Absorberl 13 Absorber2 14 Source-Detector 269.52 0 0 0 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 88.0 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 898.0 1173.2 1332.5 1836.0 I (.~*~ I JI ~ Pl AIF

-4,r ? --

cr

.>i ~t l'?n

.::-:> n '* "r*."~r Page 1of 2

Geometry Composer Report Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 09: 10:45

==

Description:==

Test geometry for Aux Bldg shallow depth concrete = 3m - 1 foot Comment: 1 layer equal to 1.27 cm depth File Name: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\CIRCULAR_PLANE\Zion 1.27cm concrete-1 foot.geo Software: I SOCS Template: CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) y

z. **. *. x Page 2 of 2

ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ODD ITilillJ R rn [

ISOCS/LabSOCS File : C: \GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\CIRCULAR ~ ~on 1. L ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 03/14/17 09 : 13 : 07 Template : CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description : Zion l.27cm Comment : Zion l . 27cm Detector : 5456 Collimator : 50MM-90D NEW Convergence: 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters] : 2 . 8274e+001 (C)

Mass [Grams] : 8.4385e+005 (C)

Length [Meters] : not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Conve rgence Fin al # of Voxels 59.54 5 . 64561e-006 r 10 . 0 0.498601 1618 88 . 03 6 . 77731e - 006 10 . 0 0.463116 1618 122 . 06 6 . 71355e-006 10 . 0 0.472362 1618 165 . 85 6 . 25215e-006 8.0 -0 . 674072 814 391. 69 4.20224e-006 8.0 -0 . 116124 406 661 . 65 3 . 25166e-006 6.0 0 . 157028 406 898.02 2 . 80927e-006 6.0 -0 . 697293 814 1173 . 22 2 . 46740e-006 4.0 -0 . 684715 814 1332.49 2.32324e-006 4. 0 -0.666609 814 1836 . 01 l . 93213e-006 4.0 -0 . 639529 814

ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS DOD OOilJO R DD [

ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C : \GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\CIRCULAR Jl1 N2 zq_=i5n 1. L ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 03/14/17 09 : 10:40 Template : CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Descript i on : Zion l . 27cm-l ft Comment : Zion l . 27cm-l ft Detector : 5456 Collimator : 50MM-90D NEW Convergence : 1 . 00 % /

Area [Sq Meters] : 2 . 8274e+001 (C )

Mass [Grams]: 8 . 4385e+005 (C)

Length [Meters] : not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Ef ficiency %Uncertainty %Converge nc e Final # of Voxels 59 . 54 6 . 31442e-006 10 . 0 -0. 2496 4 9 87 7 8 88 .0 3 7 . 57837e-006 10.0 -0 . 253382 8778 122 . 06 7 .4 9551e-006 10.0 -0.254293 8778 165 . 85 6 .977 96e - 006 8.0 - 0 . 258073 8778 391. 69 4 . 59768e-006 8.0 -0.284344 8778 661 . 65 3 . 53048e-006 6.0 -0. 301798 8778 898 . 02 3 .061 63e -0 06 6.0 -0.307864 8778 1173 . 22 2 . 6844le-006 4.0 -0. 311473 8778 1332 .4 9 2 .5 2581e - 006 4.0 - 0.309709 8778 1836 . 01 2 . 09812 e -006 4.0 - 0.311376 8778

ODD ITilIIJ R DD [

DODD DO DOD[ Non-uniform Surface Efficiencies with ECP Model

oorAru Rooc Geometry Composer Report C1~1§ f!ifRA Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 13 :09:31

==

Description:==

ECP model defined in TSD 14-022 Comment:

File Name: C: \ GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_PLANE\Zion all concrete data .geo Software: I SOCS Template: EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)

Detector: 5456 Collimator: 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole collimator])

Environment: Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00% , MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (cm)

No. Dwriptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 cL4 d.5 d.I Metlerllll Denllty ...a.cane.

1 Side Walls 0 600 none 2 Layer 1 0 none 3 Layer 2 0 none 4 Layer 3 0 none 5 Source Layer 5.8 0 2.75 concrete 2.3 1.00 6 Absorber! 0.3 hpolyeth 0.95 7 Absorber2 8 Source-Detector 300 0 0 0 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59 .5 88.0 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 898.0 1173.2 1332.5 1836.0

!EXPONENTIAL CIRCULAR PLANE I

---

Tl I

--~""'"

1. 1. l'hr*

I

( ~--j>/ -r----;

.. - .,._.~m--~--0-+_0_+- -

11.0-c

.Q 1--- !bln:.to \Apr l?*i cir.* (5..1) -----< 0 0 COnMrlt'"cn

~ 0 .5 -

Depth Page 1of2

Geometry Composer Report Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 13:09:31

==

Description:==

ECP model defined in TSD 14-022 Comment:

File Name: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_ PLANE\Zion all concrete data.geo Software: I SOCS Template: EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_ PLANE, Version : (default) y z* .. '

Page 2 of 2

oorlJ.m Rmc Geometry Composer Report CJ~~~A Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 13:12 :31

==

Description:==

ECP model without top inch data Comment: exponetial curve fit of data without top 2 layers File Name: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_P... \Zion concrete data minus lin.geo Software: I SOCS Template: EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)

Detector: 5456 Collimator: 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole collimator])

Environment: Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

No.

1 Delatptlon Side Walls d.1 0

d.2 600 Dimensions (cm) d.3 dA d.S d.I ........

none o.n.lty bl.Cone.

2 Layer 1 0 none 3 Layer 2 0 none 4 Layer 3 0 none 5 Source Layer 9.5 0 4.1 concrete 2.3 1.00 6 Absorber l 0.3 hpolyeth 0.95 7 Absorber2 8 Source-Detector 300 0 0 0 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 88.0 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 898.0 1173.2 1332.5 1836.0 IEXPONENTI AL CIRCULAR PLANE I y tk:.:."__

,,. zx

• • • 1 5.5 j___

A Page 1of2

DD~ RDDC Geometry Composer Report CJJmlf§~ A Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 13:12:31

==

Description:==

ECP model without top inch data Comment: exponetial curve fit of data without top 2 layers File Name: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_PLANE\Zion concrete data minus lin.gec Software: I SOCS Template: EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) y z . **. '* }(

Page 2 of 2

Geometry Composer Report Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 13:14:34

==

Description:==

ECP model without top two inches data Comment: exponetial curve fit of data without top 4 layers File Name: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_P... \Zion concrete data minus 2in.geo Software: I SOCS Template: EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)

Detector: 5456 Collimator: 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole collimator])

Environment: Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (cm)

No. Deealptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 d.4 d.5 d.I Mnmtlil Demlty Rel. Cone.

1 Side Walls 0 600 none 2 Layer 1 0 none 3 Layer 2 0 none 4 Layer 3 0 none 5 Source Layer 12.1 0 5.43 concrete 2.3 1.00 6 Absorber! 0.3 hpolyeth 0.95 7 Absorber2 8 Source-Detector 300 0 0 0 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 88.0 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 898.0 1173.2 1332.5 1836.0 IEXPONENTIAL CIRCULAR PLANE I y

• x

l.e.:_'__

,;

z J__

A Page 1of2

OD~ RDDC Geometry Composer Report CJ~~~A Date: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 - 13:14:34 Descript ion: ECP model without top two inches data Comment: exponetial curve fit of data without top 4 layers File Name: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\EXPONENT_CI RCULAR_ PLANE\Zion concrete data minus 2in.gec Software: I SOCS Template: EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) y z . ..... )(

Page 2 of 2

ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS DOD ITIJIIlJ R rn C D[]JO []] []JO[

ISOCS/LabSOCS File : C : \GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In - Situ\EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE ISOCS/LabSOCS Time : 03/14/17 13:09:27 -

Template: EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description : ECP - all Comment: ECP - all Detector : 5456 Collimator : 50MM-90D NEW Convergence : 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters] : 2 . 8274e+001 (C)

Mass [Grams] : 3.8538e+006 (C)

Length [Meters] : not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by us e r Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 59.54 2.9702le-006 10 . 0 -0.069336 3256 88 . 03 4.05452e-006 10.0 -0 . 172904 3256 122.06 4 . 27633e-006 10.0 -0 . 285085 3256 165 . 85 4 . 17178e-006 8.0 - 0 . 316471 3256 391. 69 3 . 06932e-006 8.0 - 0 . 072996 1624 661.65 2 . 50292e-006 6.0 - 0 . 110487 1624 898 . 02 2 .2425le - 006 6.0 -0 . 094005 1624 1173 . 2 2 2 . 01893e-006 4. 0 - 0.129291 1624 1332 . 49 l . 92199e-006 4.0 - 0 . 1 2 119 6 1624 1836 . 01 l . 6410le-006 4.0 -0 . 122452 1624

ISOCS/LABSOCS RES~LTS DOD DDDDDO R DDC ODDO DD DDOC ISOCS/LabSOCS File : C : \GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In - Situ\EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 03/14/17 13:12:27 Template : EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE Geom

Description:

ECP - 1 inch Comment: ECP - 1 inch Detector : 5456 Collimator : 50MM- 90D NEW Convergence: 1 .0 0 %

Area [Sq Meters]: 2 . 8274e+001 (C)

Mass [Grams]: 6.3123e+006 (C)

Length [MetersJ : not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 59 . 54 2 . 11252e- 006 10 . 0 -0.392368 4070 88 . 03 3 .02610e-006 10.0 -0.1 99891 4070 122 . 06 3 .27 820e-006 10 . 0 - 0 . 160452 4070 165 . 85 3 .2 5344e-006 8.0 -0. 168155 4070 391. 69 2 . 49367e-006 8.0 -0.177398 4070 661 . 65 2 . 09236e-006 6.0 - 0.225467 4070 898 . 02 l . 90647e-006 6.0 -0. 224983 4070 1173 . 22 1. 74165e - 006 4.0 -0. 223042 4070 1332 . 49 l.66929e-006 4.0 -0.212203 4070 1836 . 01 1 . 44868e-006 4.0 -0 . 194054 4070

ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS DOD DOillJ ROJ [

DODD DD DOD[

ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C : \GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE ISOCS/LabSOCS Time: 03/14/17 13 : 14 : 28 Template : EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description : ECP - 2 inches Comment: ECP - 2 inches Detector : 5456 Collimator : 50MM - 90D NEW Convergence : 1 . 00 %

Area [Sq Meters] : 2 . 8274e+001 (C)

Mass [Grams]: 8.0398e+006 (C)

Length [Meters] : not used

{C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 59 . 54 1. 70981e-006 10.0 -0 . 140384 9708 88.03 2 . 51042e - 006 10 . 0 -0.098247 9708 122 . 06 2 . 75518e - 006 10 . 0 -0 . 512290 4 8 84 165 . 85 2 . 75980e-006 8.0 - 0 . 515849 4884 3 91. 69 2 . 15955e-006 8.0 -0 . 62035 5 4 88 4 661 . 65 l . 84187e-006 6.0 -0 . 6121 2 1 4884 898 . 02 l . 69650e-006 6.0 -0.568575 4 8 84 1173 . 22 1.56509e-006 4.0 - 0.530638 4 8 84 1332 . 49 1 . 50695e-006 4.0 -0.50494 3 4884 1836 . 01 l.32264e - 006 4.0 -0.456810 4 8 84

oorAru Rooc Geometry Composer Report CJ~fi§~A Date: Thursday, March 16, 2017 - 08 :04:15

==

Description:==

ECP model defined in TSO 14-022 Comment: 3 meters minus 1 foot File Name: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOM ETRY\In-Situ\EXPONENT_CIRCU LAR_PLANE\Zion all concrete data -lft.geo Software: I SOCS Template: EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)

Detector: 5456 Collimator: 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole collimator])

Environment: Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00%, MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (cm)

No. o.atptlon d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.5 d.I Mnerlal uenlllY 'K91.Conc:.

1 Side Walls 0 600 none 2 Layer 1 0 none 3 Layer 2 0 none 4 Layer 3 0 none 5 Source Layer 5.8 0 2.75 concrete 2.3 1.00 6 Absorber! 0. 3 hpolyeth 0.95 7 Absorber2 8 Source-Detector 269.52 0 0 0 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 88.0 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 898.0 1173.2 1332.5 1836.0 IEXPONENTIAL Cl RCU LAR PLANE I Deptl'I Page 1 of 2

DD~ RDDC Geometry Composer Report CJ~~~A Date: Thursday, March 16, 2017 - 08:04 :15

==

Description:==

ECP model defined in TSD 14-022 Comment: 3 meters minus 1 foot File Name: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_PLANE\Zion all concrete data-lft.geo Software: I SOCS Template: EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default) 4 Page 2 of 2

- - - - - ------------------------------~

DD~ RDDC Geometry Composer Report CJ~fel~A Date: Thursday, March 16, 2017 - 08:08:21

==

Description:==

ECP model without top inch data (3 meters-1 foot distance)

Comment: exponetial curve fit of data without top 2 layers File Name: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\EXPONENT_CIRCULA ... \ Zion ECP data minus lin and lft.geo Software: I SOCS Template: EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version : (default)

Detector: 5456 Collimator: 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole collimator])

Environment: Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00% , MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

Dimensions (cm)

No. Dwriplion d.1 d.2 d.3 dA d.5 d.I MneNI Denllty Rel. Cone.

1 Side Walls 0 600 none 2 Layer 1 0 none 3 Layer 2 0 none 4 Layer 3 0 none 5 Source Layer 9.5 0 4.1 concrete 2.3 1.00 6 Absorber! 0.3 hpolyeth 0.95 7 Absorber2 8 Source-Detector 269.52 0 0 0 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 88.0 122. 1 165.9 391.7 661.7 898.0 1173.2 1332.5 1836.0 IEXPONENTIAL CIRCULAR PLANEI ee f

0 .5 -

_!_ Dmcix CJ.2.

(~c: )

or -1 Daptl'I Pag e 1of2

DD~ RDDC Geometry Composer Report C.BJ<ilfl ~A Date: Thursday, March 16, 2017 - 08:08:21

==

Description:==

ECP model without top inch data (3 meters-1 foot distance)

Comment: exponetial curve fit of data without top 2 layers File Name: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_ ... \Zion ECP data minus lin and lft.geo Software: I SOCS Template: EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)

Page 2 of 2

Geometry Composer Report Date: Thursday, March 16, 2017 - 08 :11:39

==

Description:==

ECP model without top two inches data (3 meters - 1 foot distance)

Comment: exponential curve fit of data without top 4 layers File Name: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\ln-Situ\EXPONENT_CIRCULA ... \Zion ECP data minus 2in and 1 ft.geo Software: I SOCS Template: EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)

Detector: 5456 Collimator: 50mm-90d new (newISOCS 50mm side 90deg collimation [large hole collimator])

Environment: Temperature = 22 °C, Pressure = 760 mm Hg, Relative Humidity = 30%

Integration: Convergence = 1.00% , MDRPN = 24 (16), CRPN = 24 (16)

No.

1 Delatptlon Side Walls d.1 0

d.2 600

• Dimensions (cm) d.3 dA d.S d.I .........

none Dendy Rel.Cone.

2 Layer 1 0 none 3 Layer 2 0 none 4 Layer 3 0 none 5 Source Layer 12.1 0 5.43 concrete 2.3 1.00 6 Absorberl 0.3 hpolyeth 0.95 7 Absorber2 8 Source-Detector 269. 52 0 0 0 0 List of energies for efficiency curve generation 59.5 88.0 122.1 165.9 391.7 661.7 898.0 1173.2 1332.5 1836.0 IEXPONENTIAL CIRCULAR PLANE I y t' ,,, x k.:."__ z 0 e """"

COn'i'tl'lt'"c n a.s

~

A

_!__ Dm!D: :l.2.

(oc:)

o~I Oeptl'I Page 1of2

Geometry Composer Report Date: Thursday, March 16, 2017 - 08:11:39

==

Description:==

ECP model without top two inches data (3 meters - 1 foot distance)

Comment: exponential curve fit of data without top 4 layers File Name: C:\GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In-Situ\EXPONENT_CIRCULAR ... \Zion ECP data minus 2in and 1 ft.gee Software: I SOCS Template: EXPONENT_CIRCULAR_PLANE, Version: (default)

Page 2 of 2

ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS DOD ITilIIJ Rrn C ISOCS/LabSOCS File : C : \GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In - Situ\EXPONENT C1fRC:fR PLANE ISOCS/LabSOCS Time : 03/16/17 08 : 04:10 Template : EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description : ECP - all-lft Comment : ECP - all-lft Detector : 5456 Collimator : 50MM-90D NEW Convergence : 1.00 %

Area [Sq Meters] : 2 . 8274e+001 (C)

Mass [Grams] : 3 . 8538e+006 (C)

Length [Meters] : not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncerta i nty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 59.54 3 . 26640e-006 10 . 0 -0 . 340638 35112 88 . 03 4 . 46862e-006 10 . 0 - 0 . 219499 35112 122 . 06 4 . 71711e - 006 10 . 0 - 0 . 178969 351 12 165 . 85 4 . 58166e-006 8.0 - 0 . 173263 35112 391. 69 3 . 32283e-006 8.0 - 0 . 140550 35112 661 . 65 2 . 69668e-006 6.0 - 0 . 132562 35112 898 . 02 2 . 41189e - 006 6.0 -0 . 140077 35112 1173 . 22 2 . 17001e-006 4.0 -0 . 149687 35112 1332 . 49 2 . 06556e-006 4.0 -0 . 152607 35112 1836 . 01 1. 76347e-006 4.0 - 0.161610 351 12

ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS ODD ITilIIIJ R DD [

ISOCS/LabSOCS File: C :\GENIE2K \iso cs\dat a \GEOMETRY\In-Situ\EXPONENT e........._H,Jl,-lrL.1.-'.+ pLANE ISOCS /LabSOCS Time : 03/16/17 08 : 08 : 16 Template: EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description : ECP-lin-lft Comment : ECP-lin-lft Detector : 5456 .

Co llimator : 50MM- 90D NEW Convergence: 1 . 00 %

Area [Sq Meters] : 2 . 8274e+001 (C)

Mass [Grams] : 6 . 3123e+006 (C)

Length [Meters] : not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modi fied by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 59 . 54 2 . 36918e-006 10.0 -0 . 109036 43890 88 . 03 3 . 38274e-00 6 10.0 - 0 . 104530 43890 122 . 06 3 . 65655e -0 06 10.0 - 0 . 073812 43890 165 . 85 3 . 61159e - 006 8.0 - 0 . 078445 43890 391.69 2 . 72798e-006 8.0 - 0 . 080835 43890 661 . 65 2 . 27302e -0 06 6.0 - 0 . 104310 43890 898 . 02 2 . 06570e-006 6.0 -0. 126119 43890 1173 . 22 1 . 88487e -0 06 4.0 - 0 . 145392 43890 1332 . 49 l . 80587e - 006 4.0 - 0 . 152263 43890 1836 . 01 l . 56650e-006 4.0 -0.166874 43890

ISOCS/LABSOCS RESULTS DOD ITIIIIIJ R DD C DDDDDDDDDC ISOCS/LabSOCS File : C : \GENIE2K\isocs\data\GEOMETRY\In - Situ\EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE ISOCS/LabSOCS Time : 03/16/17 08 : 11 : 34 -

Template : EXPONENT CIRCULAR PLANE Geom Description : ECP-2in-lft Comment : ECP - 2in-lft Detector : 5456 Collimator : 50MM-90D NEW Convergence : 1 . 00 %

Area [Sq Meters] : 2.8274e+001 (C)

Mass [Grams] : 8 . 0398e+006 (C)

Length [Meters] : not used (C) = Value calculated by ISOCS (U) = Value modified by user Energy Efficiency %Uncertainty %Convergence Final # of Voxels 59 . 54 1 . 90780e-006 10 . 0 - 0 . 249249 52668 88 . 03 2 . 79289e - 006 10 . 0 - 0 . 203908 52668 122 . 06 3 . 06133e-006 10 . 0 - 0 . 184079 52668 165 . 85 3 . 05304e-006 8.0 - 0.163807 52668 391. 69 2 . 36557e - 006 8.0 -0.140595 52668 661 . 65 2 . 00554e-006 6.0 -0.170948 52668 898 . 02 l . 84216e-006 6.0 -0 . 189144 52668 1173 . 22 l . 69698e-006 4.0 -0 . 203167 52668 1332 . 49 l.63318e-006 4. 0 -0 . 207162 52668 1836 . 01 1.43248e-006 4.0 - 0 . 216558 52668