ML063490027: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 1 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Perry CAL Inspections Perry CAL Inspections
{{#Wiki_filter:Perry Nuclear Power Plant Perry CAL Inspections - Human Performance, CAP Effectiveness, and Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region III Lisle, Illinois            1 December 13, 2006
--Human Human Performance, CAP Effectiveness, and Performance, CAP Effectiveness, and Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Maintenance Procedure AdequacyNuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Regulatory Commission  
--Region IIIRegion IIILisle, IllinoisLisle, IllinoisDecember 13
, 2006December 13, 2006 2 2www.nrc.gov Meeting Agenda
**Introductions and Meeting PurposeIntroductions and Meeting Purpose
**Overview of Confirmato ry Action Letter (CAL)Overview of Confirmato ry Action Letter (CAL)
**Overview of CAL Inspection ActivitiesOverview of CAL Inspection Activities
**Human Performance Action Item Effectiveness Review Human Performance Action Item Effectiveness Review
--Inspection Scope and Results Inspection Scope and Results
**Supplemental Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Supplemental Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Effectiveness Review Effectiveness Review
--Inspection Scope and ResultsInspection Scope and Results
**Corrective Action Program Action Item Effectiveness Corrective Action Program Action Item Effectiveness Review Review --Inspection Scope and Results  Inspection Scope and Results 
**Licensee Response and RemarksLicensee Response and Remarks
**Upcoming NRC ActivitiesUpcoming NRC Activities
**Public Comments and Questions of the NRC Public Comments and Questions of the NRC 3 3www.nrc.gov Purpose of Today's MeetingProvide a public forum for the discussion of recent Provide a public forum for the discussion of recent Perry Nuclear Power Plant performancePerry Nuclear Power Plant performance NRC to discuss the results of our review of NRC to discuss the results of our review of FENOC's FENOC's actions to address issues in the Human Performance actions to address issues in the Human Performance and Corrective Action Program areas of the Perry and Corrective Action Program areas of the Perry CAL CAL  NRC to discuss the result of our review of NRC to discuss the result of our review of FENOC's FENOC'sactions to address th e Maintenance Procedure actions to address th e Maintenance Procedure Adequacy aspect of the IP 95002 Issues area of the Adequacy aspect of the IP 95002 Issues area of the Perry CAL Perry CAL 4 4www.nrc.gov Review of Perry Performance
**August 2004 August 2004
--Perry Enters Multiple/Repetitive Perry Enters Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone Colu mn of NRC Action Matrix Degraded Cornerstone Colu mn of NRC Action Matrix
**January January--May 2005 May 2005 --IP 95003 Inspection ConductedIP 95003 Inspection Conducted
**May 2005 May 2005 --Public Exit Meeting for IP 95003 Inspection Public Exit Meeting for IP 95003 Inspection
**July 2005 July 2005
--IP 95003 Inspection Report IssuedIP 95003 Inspection Report Issued
**August 2005 August 2005
--FENOC Response to IP 95003 IssuesFENOC Response to IP 95003 Issues
**September 2005 September 2005
--NRC Issues CAL NRC Issues CAL 5 5www.nrc.gov Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL)FENOC Committed to Sustained ImprovementFENOC Committed to Sustained ImprovementCorrective Action Program EffectivenessCorrective Action Program EffectivenessHuman PerformanceHuman PerformanceEmergency Preparedness Emergency PreparednessInspection Procedure 95002 Issues Inspection Procedure 95002 Issues 6 6www.nrc.gov Perry CAL Inspection Activities Planned NRC Planned NRC FollowupFollowup Inspection Activities Inspection Activities
**Review Licensee's Asse ssment Activities and Review Licensee's Asse ssment Activities and Corrective Action Development Corrective Action Development
**Review Corrective Action ImplementationReview Corrective Action Implementation
**Review Corrective Action EffectivenessReview Corrective Action Effectiveness 7 7www.nrc.gov Perry Nuclear Power Plant Completed NRC CAL Inspections Completed CAL Completed CAL Followup FollowupInspectionsInspectionsPII Phase 2 Review PII Phase 2 ReviewIP 95002 Issues IP 95002 Issues
--Action Item ImplementationAction Item ImplementationCorrective Action Program Corrective Action Program
--Action Item Action Item ImplementationImplementationEmergency Preparedness Emergency Preparedness
--Action Item Action Item Implementation and Effectiveness Implementation and EffectivenessHuman Performance Human Performance
--Action Item ImplementationAction Item ImplementationIP 95002 Issues IP 95002 Issues
--Action Item Effectiveness Action Item Effectiveness 8 8www.nrc.govInspection Scope -Human Performance (HU) Action Item EffectivenessHU Action Item Effectiveness HU Action Item Effectiveness
--Scope Scope**Determine whether HU tools are adequately Determine whether HU tools are adequately implemented implemented
**Determine whether supervisors actively monitor and Determine whether supervisors actively monitor and reinforce use of HU tools reinforce use of HU tools
**Determine whether Key Performance Indicators Determine whether Key Performance Indicators
((KPIs KPIs) reflect improved human performance) reflect improved human performance
**Determine whether appropriate corrective actions Determine whether appropriate corrective actions implemented to address HU issues in implemented to address HU issues in KPIs KPIs 9 9www.nrc.govInspection Results -Human Performance Action Item Effectiveness HU Action Item Effectiveness HU Action Item Effectiveness
--Results Results**Use of HU Tools Use of HU Tools
--AdequateAdequate**Supervisory Reinforcement of HU Tools Supervisory Reinforcement of HU Tools
--Adequate Adequate **KPI Review Results KPI Review Results
--Adequate Adequate**Corrective Actions to Address HU Issues Corrective Actions to Address HU Issues
--Adequate Adequate**One Green finding identified One Green finding identifiedNo additional inspection beyond ROP baselineNo additional inspection beyond ROP baseline 10 10www.nrc.govBackground -Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Inspection Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Maintenance Procedure Adequacy
--Background


===Background===
Meeting Agenda
**August 15, 2006 August 15, 2006
* Introductions and Meeting Purpose
--IP 95002 Issues CAL IP 95002 Issues CAL Followup Followup Inspection Completed Inspection Completed
* Overview of Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL)
**Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Maintenance Procedure Adequacy  
* Overview of CAL Inspection Activities
--Indeterminate IndeterminateInsufficient Number of Procedures to ReviewInsufficient Number of Procedures to ReviewMaintenance Procedure Revision Process IssuesMaintenance Procedure Revision Process IssuesSupplemental Review Effort NecessarySupplemental Review Effort Necessary 11 11www.nrc.govInspection Scope -Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Maintenance Procedure Adequacy
* Human Performance Action Item Effectiveness Review -
--Scope Scope**Review effectiveness of actions to address Review effectiveness of actions to address Maintenance Procedure Adequacy aspect of Maintenance Procedure Adequacy aspect of          IP 95002 Issues area of Perry CALIP 95002 Issues area of Perry CAL
Inspection Scope and Results
**Determine whether additi onal inspection beyond Determine whether additi onal inspection beyond ROP Baseline Inspection Program is requiredROP Baseline Inspection Program is required 12 12www.nrc.govInspection Results -Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Maintenance Procedure Adequacy
* Supplemental Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Effectiveness Review - Inspection Scope and Results
--Results ResultsNo findings of significance identifiedNo findings of significance identifiedMaintenance Procedure Adequacy Maintenance Procedure Adequacy  
* Corrective Action Program Action Item Effectiveness Review - Inspection Scope and Results
--Adequate AdequateResolution of Vulnerabilities Resolution of Vulnerabilities  
* Licensee Response and Remarks
--Adequate AdequateNo additional inspection beyond ROP baselineNo additional inspection beyond ROP baseline 13 13www.nrc.govInspection Scope -Corrective Action Program (CAP) Action Item EffectivenessCAP Action Item Effectiveness CAP Action Item Effectiveness  
* Upcoming NRC Activities
--Scope Scope**Determine whether actions to address CAP Determine whether actions to address CAP issues were effective issues were effective
* Public Comments and Questions of the NRC            2 www.nrc.gov
**Determine whether CAP Key Performance Determine whether CAP Key Performance Indicators (Indicators (KPIs KPIs) reflect improved CAP ) reflect improved CAP performanceperformance
 
**Determine whether appropriate corrective Determine whether appropriate corrective actions implemented to address CAP issues in actions implemented to address CAP issues in KPIs KPIs 14 14www.nrc.govInspection Scope -Corrective Action Program (CAP) Action Item EffectivenessCAP Action Item Effectiveness CAP Action Item Effectiveness  
Purpose of Todays Meeting z Provide a public forum for the discussion of recent Perry Nuclear Power Plant performance z NRC to discuss the results of our review of FENOCs actions to address issues in the Human Performance and Corrective Action Program areas of the Perry CAL z NRC to discuss the result of our review of FENOCs actions to address the Maintenance Procedure Adequacy aspect of the IP 95002 Issues area of the Perry CAL 3
--Scope Scope**Problem Evaluation and Resolution Problem Evaluation and Resolution
www.nrc.gov
**Audits and Self Audits and Self
 
--Assessment Effectiveness Assessment Effectiveness
Review of Perry Performance
**Staff Willingness to Raise Issues Staff Willingness to Raise Issues
* August 2004 - Perry Enters Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone Column of NRC Action Matrix
**Use of Operating ExperienceUse of Operating Experience
* January-May 2005 - IP 95003 Inspection Conducted
**Key Performance Indicat or Implementation Key Performance Indicat or Implementation and Results and Results 15 15www.nrc.govInspection Results -Corrective Action Program Action Item EffectivenessCAP Action Item Effectiveness CAP Action Item Effectiveness  
* May 2005 - Public Exit Meeting for IP 95003 Inspection
--Results Results**Problem Evaluation and Resolution Problem Evaluation and Resolution
* July 2005 - IP 95003 Inspection Report Issued
--Adequate Adequate**Audits and Self Audits and Self
* August 2005 - FENOC Response to IP 95003 Issues
--Assessment Effectiveness Assessment Effectiveness
* September 2005 - NRC Issues CAL 4
--Adequate Adequate**Staff Willingness to Raise Issues Staff Willingness to Raise Issues
www.nrc.gov
--Adequate Adequate**Use of Operating Experience Use of Operating Experience
 
--Adequate Adequate**Key Performance Indicators Key Performance Indicators
Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL)
--Adequate Adequate**One Green Finding IdentifiedOne Green Finding IdentifiedNo additional inspection beyond ROP baseline No additional inspection beyond ROP baseline 16 16www.nrc.gov SummaryPerry is being operated safely Perry is being operated safelyAll scheduled CAL All scheduled CAL Followup Followup inspections inspections complete completeNo additional inspections planned beyond No additional inspections planned beyond ROP Baseline Inspection Program inspections ROP Baseline Inspection Program inspections 17 17www.nrc.gov Licensee Response and Remarks 18 18www.nrc.gov Perry Nuclear Power Plant Upcoming NRC ActivitiesDecember 31, 2006 December 31, 2006  
FENOC Committed to Sustained Improvement 3/4 Corrective Action Program Effectiveness 3/4 Human Performance 3/4 Emergency Preparedness 3/4 Inspection Procedure 95002 Issues 5
--Finalize HU and CAP CAL Finalize HU and CAP CAL Followup Followup inspection results and i ssue inspection reports inspection results and i ssue inspection reportsJanuary 2, 2007 January 2, 2007  
www.nrc.gov
--Conduct IP 95001 Inspection; White Conduct IP 95001 Inspection; White EAC Power System PI in 2EAC Power System PI in 2 nd nd Quarter 2006 Quarter 2006January 10, 2007 January 10, 2007  
 
--Conduct public meeting in Region III. Conduct public meeting in Region III. FENOC to discuss assessment of completion of CAL FENOC to discuss assessment of completion of CAL itemsitems 19 19www.nrc.gov Perry Nuclear Power Plant Upcoming NRC ActivitiesEarly February 2007 Early February 2007  
Perry CAL Inspection Activities Planned NRC Followup Inspection Activities
--NRC to internally discuss Perry NRC to internally discuss Perry performance and assess the sustainability of that performance and assess the sustainability of that performance at the annual internal Endperformance at the annual internal End
* Review Licensees Assessment Activities and Corrective Action Development
--of of--Cycle meeting Cycle meetingEarly March 2007 Early March 2007  
* Review Corrective Action Implementation
--NRC to issue End NRC to issue End
* Review Corrective Action Effectiveness 6
--of of--Cycle letter to Cycle letter to FENOC FENOCMid Mid--March 2007 March 2007  
www.nrc.gov
--NRC to conduct public meeting to NRC to conduct public meeting to discuss End discuss End
 
--of of--Cycle assessment resultsCycle assessment results 20 20www.nrc.gov Contacts for Additional InformationRegional Public Affairs OfficerRegional Public Affairs Officer
Perry Nuclear Power Plant Completed NRC CAL Inspections Completed CAL Followup Inspections 3/4 PII Phase 2 Review 3/4 IP 95002 Issues - Action Item Implementation 3/4 Corrective Action Program - Action Item Implementation 3/4 Emergency Preparedness - Action Item Implementation and Effectiveness 3/4 Human Performance - Action Item Implementation 3/4 IP 95002 Issues - Action Item Effectiveness 7
**Jan Strasma or Viktoria Mitlyng Jan Strasma or Viktoria Mitlyng
www.nrc.gov
**Phone: (630) 829 Phone:  (630) 829
 
--9663 or (630) 829 9663 or (630) 829
Inspection Scope - Human Performance (HU) Action Item Effectiveness HU Action Item Effectiveness - Scope
--9662 9662Perry Resident Inspector OfficePerry Resident Inspector Office
* Determine whether HU tools are adequately implemented
**Mark Mark Franke Franke , Senior Resident Inspector , Senior Resident Inspector
* Determine whether supervisors actively monitor and reinforce use of HU tools
**Mark Mark Wilk Wilk , Resident Inspector , Resident Inspector
* Determine whether Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) reflect improved human performance
**Phone:  (440) 259 Phone: (440) 259
* Determine whether appropriate corrective actions implemented to address HU issues in KPIs 8
--3610 3610 21 21www.nrc.gov Reference SourcesReactor Oversight ProcessReactor Oversight Processhttp://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.htmlhttp://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.htmlPublic Electronic Reading RoomPublic Electronic Reading Roomhttp://www.nrc.gov/readinghttp://www.nrc.gov/reading
www.nrc.gov
--rm.htmlrm.html Public Document Room Public Document Room1 1--800 800--397 397--4209 (Toll Free) 4209 (Toll Free) 22 22www.nrc.gov SummaryPerry is being operated safely Perry is being operated safelyAll scheduled CAL All scheduled CAL Followup Followup inspections inspections complete completeNo additional inspections planned beyond No additional inspections planned beyond ROP Baseline Inspection Program inspections ROP Baseline Inspection Program inspections}}
 
Inspection Results - Human Performance Action Item Effectiveness HU Action Item Effectiveness - Results
* Use of HU Tools - Adequate
* Supervisory Reinforcement of HU Tools -
Adequate
* KPI Review Results - Adequate
* Corrective Actions to Address HU Issues -
Adequate
* One Green finding identified No additional inspection beyond ROP baseline 9
www.nrc.gov
 
Background - Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Inspection Maintenance Procedure Adequacy - Background
* August 15, 2006 - IP 95002 Issues CAL Followup Inspection Completed
* Maintenance Procedure Adequacy -
Indeterminate 3/4 Insufficient Number of Procedures to Review 3/4 Maintenance Procedure Revision Process Issues Supplemental Review Effort Necessary       10 www.nrc.gov
 
Inspection Scope - Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Maintenance Procedure Adequacy - Scope
* Review effectiveness of actions to address Maintenance Procedure Adequacy aspect of IP 95002 Issues area of Perry CAL
* Determine whether additional inspection beyond ROP Baseline Inspection Program is required 11 www.nrc.gov
 
Inspection Results - Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Maintenance Procedure Adequacy - Results 3/4 No findings of significance identified 3/4 Maintenance Procedure Adequacy - Adequate 3/4 Resolution of Vulnerabilities - Adequate No additional inspection beyond ROP baseline 12 www.nrc.gov
 
Inspection Scope - Corrective Action Program (CAP) Action Item Effectiveness CAP Action Item Effectiveness - Scope
* Determine whether actions to address CAP issues were effective
* Determine whether CAP Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) reflect improved CAP performance
* Determine whether appropriate corrective actions implemented to address CAP issues in KPIs 13 www.nrc.gov
 
Inspection Scope - Corrective Action Program (CAP) Action Item Effectiveness CAP Action Item Effectiveness - Scope
* Problem Evaluation and Resolution
* Audits and Self-Assessment Effectiveness
* Staff Willingness to Raise Issues
* Use of Operating Experience
* Key Performance Indicator Implementation and Results 14 www.nrc.gov
 
Inspection Results - Corrective Action Program Action Item Effectiveness CAP Action Item Effectiveness - Results
* Problem Evaluation and Resolution - Adequate
* Audits and Self-Assessment Effectiveness - Adequate
* Staff Willingness to Raise Issues - Adequate
* Use of Operating Experience - Adequate
* Key Performance Indicators - Adequate
* One Green Finding Identified No additional inspection beyond ROP baseline 15 www.nrc.gov
 
Summary Perry is being operated safely All scheduled CAL Followup inspections complete No additional inspections planned beyond ROP Baseline Inspection Program inspections 16 www.nrc.gov
 
Licensee Response and Remarks 17 www.nrc.gov
 
Perry Nuclear Power Plant Upcoming NRC Activities 3/4 December 31, 2006 - Finalize HU and CAP CAL Followup inspection results and issue inspection reports 3/4 January 2, 2007 - Conduct IP 95001 Inspection; White EAC Power System PI in 2nd Quarter 2006 3/4 January 10, 2007 - Conduct public meeting in Region III.
FENOC to discuss assessment of completion of CAL items 18 www.nrc.gov
 
Perry Nuclear Power Plant Upcoming NRC Activities 3/4 Early February 2007 - NRC to internally discuss Perry performance and assess the sustainability of that performance at the annual internal End-of-Cycle meeting 3/4 Early March 2007 - NRC to issue End-of-Cycle letter to FENOC 3/4 Mid-March 2007 - NRC to conduct public meeting to discuss End-of-Cycle assessment results 19 www.nrc.gov
 
Contacts for Additional Information Regional Public Affairs Officer
* Jan Strasma or Viktoria Mitlyng
* Phone: (630) 829-9663 or (630) 829-9662 Perry Resident Inspector Office
* Mark Franke, Senior Resident Inspector
* Mark Wilk, Resident Inspector
* Phone: (440) 259-3610 20 www.nrc.gov
 
Reference Sources z Reactor Oversight Process http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html z Public Electronic Reading Room http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html z Public Document Room 1-800-397-4209 (Toll Free) 21 www.nrc.gov
 
Summary Perry is being operated safely All scheduled CAL Followup inspections complete No additional inspections planned beyond ROP Baseline Inspection Program inspections 22 www.nrc.gov}}

Revision as of 11:18, 23 November 2019

12/13/2006 NRC Slides from Public Meeting to Discuss Results of NRC Confirmatory Action Letter Follow-Up Inspections
ML063490027
Person / Time
Site: Perry FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 12/13/2006
From:
NRC/RGN-III
To:
References
Download: ML063490027 (22)


Text

Perry Nuclear Power Plant Perry CAL Inspections - Human Performance, CAP Effectiveness, and Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region III Lisle, Illinois 1 December 13, 2006

Meeting Agenda

  • Introductions and Meeting Purpose
  • Overview of Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL)
  • Overview of CAL Inspection Activities
  • Human Performance Action Item Effectiveness Review -

Inspection Scope and Results

  • Supplemental Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Effectiveness Review - Inspection Scope and Results
  • Corrective Action Program Action Item Effectiveness Review - Inspection Scope and Results
  • Licensee Response and Remarks
  • Upcoming NRC Activities
  • Public Comments and Questions of the NRC 2 www.nrc.gov

Purpose of Todays Meeting z Provide a public forum for the discussion of recent Perry Nuclear Power Plant performance z NRC to discuss the results of our review of FENOCs actions to address issues in the Human Performance and Corrective Action Program areas of the Perry CAL z NRC to discuss the result of our review of FENOCs actions to address the Maintenance Procedure Adequacy aspect of the IP 95002 Issues area of the Perry CAL 3

www.nrc.gov

Review of Perry Performance

  • August 2004 - Perry Enters Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone Column of NRC Action Matrix
  • January-May 2005 - IP 95003 Inspection Conducted
  • May 2005 - Public Exit Meeting for IP 95003 Inspection
  • July 2005 - IP 95003 Inspection Report Issued
  • September 2005 - NRC Issues CAL 4

www.nrc.gov

Confirmatory Action Letter (CAL)

FENOC Committed to Sustained Improvement 3/4 Corrective Action Program Effectiveness 3/4 Human Performance 3/4 Emergency Preparedness 3/4 Inspection Procedure 95002 Issues 5

www.nrc.gov

Perry CAL Inspection Activities Planned NRC Followup Inspection Activities

  • Review Licensees Assessment Activities and Corrective Action Development
  • Review Corrective Action Implementation
  • Review Corrective Action Effectiveness 6

www.nrc.gov

Perry Nuclear Power Plant Completed NRC CAL Inspections Completed CAL Followup Inspections 3/4 PII Phase 2 Review 3/4 IP 95002 Issues - Action Item Implementation 3/4 Corrective Action Program - Action Item Implementation 3/4 Emergency Preparedness - Action Item Implementation and Effectiveness 3/4 Human Performance - Action Item Implementation 3/4 IP 95002 Issues - Action Item Effectiveness 7

www.nrc.gov

Inspection Scope - Human Performance (HU) Action Item Effectiveness HU Action Item Effectiveness - Scope

  • Determine whether HU tools are adequately implemented
  • Determine whether supervisors actively monitor and reinforce use of HU tools
  • Determine whether Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) reflect improved human performance
  • Determine whether appropriate corrective actions implemented to address HU issues in KPIs 8

www.nrc.gov

Inspection Results - Human Performance Action Item Effectiveness HU Action Item Effectiveness - Results

  • Use of HU Tools - Adequate
  • Supervisory Reinforcement of HU Tools -

Adequate

  • KPI Review Results - Adequate
  • Corrective Actions to Address HU Issues -

Adequate

  • One Green finding identified No additional inspection beyond ROP baseline 9

www.nrc.gov

Background - Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Inspection Maintenance Procedure Adequacy - Background

  • August 15, 2006 - IP 95002 Issues CAL Followup Inspection Completed
  • Maintenance Procedure Adequacy -

Indeterminate 3/4 Insufficient Number of Procedures to Review 3/4 Maintenance Procedure Revision Process Issues Supplemental Review Effort Necessary 10 www.nrc.gov

Inspection Scope - Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Maintenance Procedure Adequacy - Scope

  • Review effectiveness of actions to address Maintenance Procedure Adequacy aspect of IP 95002 Issues area of Perry CAL
  • Determine whether additional inspection beyond ROP Baseline Inspection Program is required 11 www.nrc.gov

Inspection Results - Maintenance Procedure Adequacy Maintenance Procedure Adequacy - Results 3/4 No findings of significance identified 3/4 Maintenance Procedure Adequacy - Adequate 3/4 Resolution of Vulnerabilities - Adequate No additional inspection beyond ROP baseline 12 www.nrc.gov

Inspection Scope - Corrective Action Program (CAP) Action Item Effectiveness CAP Action Item Effectiveness - Scope

  • Determine whether actions to address CAP issues were effective
  • Determine whether CAP Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) reflect improved CAP performance
  • Determine whether appropriate corrective actions implemented to address CAP issues in KPIs 13 www.nrc.gov

Inspection Scope - Corrective Action Program (CAP) Action Item Effectiveness CAP Action Item Effectiveness - Scope

  • Problem Evaluation and Resolution
  • Audits and Self-Assessment Effectiveness
  • Staff Willingness to Raise Issues
  • Use of Operating Experience
  • Key Performance Indicator Implementation and Results 14 www.nrc.gov

Inspection Results - Corrective Action Program Action Item Effectiveness CAP Action Item Effectiveness - Results

  • Problem Evaluation and Resolution - Adequate
  • Audits and Self-Assessment Effectiveness - Adequate
  • Staff Willingness to Raise Issues - Adequate
  • Use of Operating Experience - Adequate
  • Key Performance Indicators - Adequate
  • One Green Finding Identified No additional inspection beyond ROP baseline 15 www.nrc.gov

Summary Perry is being operated safely All scheduled CAL Followup inspections complete No additional inspections planned beyond ROP Baseline Inspection Program inspections 16 www.nrc.gov

Licensee Response and Remarks 17 www.nrc.gov

Perry Nuclear Power Plant Upcoming NRC Activities 3/4 December 31, 2006 - Finalize HU and CAP CAL Followup inspection results and issue inspection reports 3/4 January 2, 2007 - Conduct IP 95001 Inspection; White EAC Power System PI in 2nd Quarter 2006 3/4 January 10, 2007 - Conduct public meeting in Region III.

FENOC to discuss assessment of completion of CAL items 18 www.nrc.gov

Perry Nuclear Power Plant Upcoming NRC Activities 3/4 Early February 2007 - NRC to internally discuss Perry performance and assess the sustainability of that performance at the annual internal End-of-Cycle meeting 3/4 Early March 2007 - NRC to issue End-of-Cycle letter to FENOC 3/4 Mid-March 2007 - NRC to conduct public meeting to discuss End-of-Cycle assessment results 19 www.nrc.gov

Contacts for Additional Information Regional Public Affairs Officer

  • Phone: (630) 829-9663 or (630) 829-9662 Perry Resident Inspector Office
  • Mark Wilk, Resident Inspector
  • Phone: (440) 259-3610 20 www.nrc.gov

Reference Sources z Reactor Oversight Process http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html z Public Electronic Reading Room http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html z Public Document Room 1-800-397-4209 (Toll Free) 21 www.nrc.gov

Summary Perry is being operated safely All scheduled CAL Followup inspections complete No additional inspections planned beyond ROP Baseline Inspection Program inspections 22 www.nrc.gov