ML071780190: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:July 05, 2007Mr. William R. CampbellChief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
{{#Wiki_filter:July 05, 2007 Mr. William R. Campbell Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 - REQUEST FORADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR EXTENDED POWER UPRATE - ROUND 13 (TS-431-S AND TS-418) (TAC NOS. MD5262, MD5263, AND MD5264)  
BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR EXTENDED POWER UPRATE - ROUND 13 (TS-431-S AND TS-418) (TAC NOS. MD5262, MD5263, AND MD5264)


==Dear Mr. Campbell:==
==Dear Mr. Campbell:==


By letters dated June 28 and 25, 2004, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA, the licensee)submitted amendment requests for Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN), Units 1, 2 and 3, as supplemented by letters dated August 23, 2004, February 23, April 25, June 6, and December 19, 2005, February 1 and 28, March 7, 9, 23 and 31, April 13, May 5 and 11, June 12, 15, 23 and 27, July 6, 21, 24, 26, and 31, December 1, 5, 11 and 21, 2006, January 31, February 16, and 26, and April 6, 18 and 24, 2007. The proposed amendments would change the BFN operating licenses for Units 1, 2 and 3 toincrease the maximum authorized power level by approximately 15 percent. In a letter dated November 7, 2006, TVA reported changes in the modeling used to determine compliance with emergency core cooling system requirements. The enclosed Request for Additional Information is related to this submittal.A response to the enclosed Request for Additional Information is needed before the NuclearRegulatory Commission staff can complete the review. This request was discussed with Mr. David Langley of your staff on June 4, 2007, and it was agreed that TVA would respond within 30 days of issuance of this letter.If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2315.Sincerely,/RA/Eva A. Brown, Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket Nos. 50-259, 50-260 and 50-296
By letters dated June 28 and 25, 2004, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA, the licensee) submitted amendment requests for Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN), Units 1, 2 and 3, as supplemented by letters dated August 23, 2004, February 23, April 25, June 6, and December 19, 2005, February 1 and 28, March 7, 9, 23 and 31, April 13, May 5 and 11, June 12, 15, 23 and 27, July 6, 21, 24, 26, and 31, December 1, 5, 11 and 21, 2006, January 31, February 16, and 26, and April 6, 18 and 24, 2007.
The proposed amendments would change the BFN operating licenses for Units 1, 2 and 3 to increase the maximum authorized power level by approximately 15 percent. In a letter dated November 7, 2006, TVA reported changes in the modeling used to determine compliance with emergency core cooling system requirements. The enclosed Request for Additional Information is related to this submittal.
A response to the enclosed Request for Additional Information is needed before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff can complete the review. This request was discussed with Mr. David Langley of your staff on June 4, 2007, and it was agreed that TVA would respond within 30 days of issuance of this letter.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2315.
Sincerely,
                                                    /RA/
Eva A. Brown, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-259, 50-260 and 50-296


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
Request for Additional Information cc w/enclosure: See next page  
Request for Additional Information cc w/enclosure: See next page


ML071780190   NRR-088 OFFICELPL2-2/PMLPL2-2/LADSS/SBWB/BCDRA/APLA/BCLPL2-2/BC NAMEEBrownBClaytonGCranston MRubinTBoyce DATE07 / 05 /0707 / 02 /0707 / 05 /07 06 / 29 /07 07/ 05 /07 Letter to William R. Campbell, Jr. from Eva A. Brown dated July 5, 2007
ML071780190                               NRR-088 OFFICE      LPL2-2/PM        LPL2-2/LA      DSS/SBWB/BC DRA/APLA/BC          LPL2-2/BC NAME          EBrown          BClayton        GCranston        MRubin        TBoyce DATE        07 / 05 /07      07 / 02 /07      07 / 05 /07     06 / 29 /07   07/ 05 /07
 
Letter to William R. Campbell, Jr. from Eva A. Brown dated July 5, 2007


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 - REQUEST FORADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR EXTENDED POWER UPRATE - ROUND 13 (TS-431-S AND TS-418) (TAC NOS. MD5262, MD5263 AND MD5264) DISTRIBUTION:
BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR EXTENDED POWER UPRATE - ROUND 13 (TS-431-S AND TS-418) (TAC NOS. MD5262, MD5263 AND MD5264)
DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC LPL2-2 R/F RidsNrrDorlLpl2-2 RidsNrrPMEBrown RidsNrrLABClayton (Hard Copy)
PUBLIC LPL2-2 R/F RidsNrrDorlLpl2-2 RidsNrrPMEBrown RidsNrrLABClayton (Hard Copy)
RidsNrrDorlDpr RidsNrrDssSbwb (GCranston)
RidsNrrDorlDpr RidsNrrDssSbwb (GCranston)
RidsNrrDraApla (MRubin)
RidsNrrDraApla (MRubin)
RidsNrrPMTAlexion RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter RidsOgcRp THuang MRazzaque TNakanishi LWard MLobel MStutzke EnclosureREQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONEXTENDED POWER UPRATETENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITYBROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1, 2 AND 3DOCKET NOS. 50-259 , 50-260 AND 50-296 APLA28./30.Confirm that the following success criteria were used to estimate the risk relatedto the containment overpressure (COP) credit:InitiatorInjectionNPSHLarge Break Lossof coolant Accident (LLOCA)1 core spray (CS)pump or1 Low PressureCore Injection (LPCI) pump3 or 4 residual heat removal (RHR) pumps/heatexchanges (H/Xs) aligned to spent fuel pool cooling (SPC) or2 RHR pumps/HXs aligned to SPC and favorableplant conditions (initial SP volume at 123,500 ft 3 ,river water temperature at 85 degrees F, torus water temperature less than or equal to 86 degrees F) or2 pumps/HXs aligned to SPC and containmentintegrity (COP credit)Note:  1 pump/HX aligned to SPC andcontainment integrity (COP credit) will not provideadequate NPSH to the low pressure emergency core cooling system (ECCS) pumps during LLOCAsAnticipatedTransient Without Scram (ATWS)
RidsNrrPMTAlexion RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter RidsOgcRp THuang MRazzaque TNakanishi LWard MLobel MStutzke
 
orStation Blackout (SBO) (upon AC power recovery after 4 hours)1 CS pump or1 LPCI pumpcontainment integrity (COP credit)Note: Does not depend on the number of RHRpumps/HXs aligned to SPC  Other transients1 CS pump or1 LPCI pump2 or more RHR pumps/HXs aligned to SPC or1 pump/HX aligned to SPC and containmentintegrity (COP credit)29./31.Describe any interlocks or procedural prohibitions that preclude the simultaneousopening of the LPCI valves, SPC valves, and/or drywell spray valves in the same RHR subsystem. 30./32.The licensee has made a commitment to terminate drywell cooling within two ofentry into the Appendix R fire safe shutdown operating procedures. Address how this commitment was considered during development of the probabilistic risk
 
assessment (PRA) success criteria.31./33.The SPC mode is manually aligned by the operator. Describe how the operatordecides the number of RHR pumps/HXs to align to SPC. Address whether it is credible (e.g., within procedural guidance) that the operator would actually align three or four RHR pumps/HXs to SPC.32./34.Determine if there is a significant statistical correlation between the suppressionpool water level, river water temperature, and/or torus water temperature. 33./35.Discuss whether it is possible to eliminate or substantially reduce the need forthe COP credit by maximizing the suppression pool water level, minimizing the initial torus water temperature and/or reducing the amount of power uprate.34./36.Provide the approximate high confidence of low probability of failure (HCLPF) ofthe Browns Ferry containment structure (including considerations of personnel access or equipment hatches, penetrations, etc.). 35./37.Discuss whether the fire risk evaluation contained in the IPEEE addressesspurious actuations (hot shorts) of the containment isolation valves or the need for the COP credit. If not, address the change in risk considering COP and submit a summary of the updated results.36./37.Discuss when and how the peer review for the Unit 1 PRA was conducted(identify the participants, describe what methods were used, etc.), and submit the peer review report. Indicate which comments may significantly affect the PRA results, insights, and conclusions concerning the proposed EPU. Also, discuss the plans and timetable to resolve comments and revise the PRA model. 37./38.Explain how COP credit maintains the defense-in-depth concept providedSection 2.2.1.1 of Regulatory guide 1.174. Specifically address each of the seven bulleted items with particular emphasis on the fifth item (independence of barriers is not degraded). SBWB(Unit 1 Only)67.Discuss whether the 3-D MONICORE core monitoring system is based onTGBLA06/PANAC11 methods.68.The 50 megawatt thermal/million pounds mass/hour (MWt/Mlbm/hr) limit establishes thegeneric envelope for General Electric neutronic methods nodal, bundle and axial power distribution uncertainties. Discuss whether the core thermal power to core flow ratio for the Unit 1 extended power uprate will remain below 50 MWt/Mlbm/hr at any statepoint in the allowed operating domain limit. 69.Discuss whether the plant specific R-factor calculation at a bundle level was performedconsistent with lattice axial void conditions expected for the hot channel operating state. 70.The presence of bypass voiding at the low-flow conditions where instabilities are likelycan result in calibration errors. Discuss whether these calibration errors were accounted for when determining the setpoints for the detect and suppress long term methodology.(Units 2 and 3 Only) 82.Provide the reference and/or description of the models governing counter-current flow(CCFL) at the exit to the hot bundle/core. Also identify the reference that describes the validation (separate effects and integral test data comparisons) of the CCFL limit model governing top down cooling in rod bundles. 83.Provide the vapor and liquid hot bundle exit velocities versus time for the 0.05 ft 2 breakspresented in the April 18, 2007, SBWB-64 Supplement response.84.Provide the axial power shapes used in the calculations provided in the April 18, 2007,request for additional information response.
William R. Campbell, Jr.BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANTTennessee Valley Authority cc:Mr. Ashok S. Bhatnagar
 
Senior Vice President Nuclear Generation Development and Construction Tennessee Valley Authority
 
6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN  37402-2801  Mr. Preston D. Swafford Senior Vice President Nuclear Support Tennessee Valley Authority
 
6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN  37402-2801  Mr. Walter M. Justice II Interim Vice President Nuclear Engineering & Technical Services Tennessee Valley Authority
 
6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN  37402-2801Brian O'Grady, Site Vice PresidentBrowns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL  35609General CounselTennessee Valley Authority ET 11A 400 West Summit Hill Drive Knoxville, TN  37902Mr. John C. Fornicola, General ManagerNuclear Assurance Tennessee Valley Authority


6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN  37402-2801Mr. Bruce Aukland, Plant ManagerBrowns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL  35609Mr. Masoud Bajestani, Vice PresidentBrowns Ferry Unit 1 Restart Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000Decatur, AL  35609Mr. Robert G. Jones, General Manager Browns Ferry Site Operations Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL  35609Mr. Larry S. MellenBrowns Ferry Unit 1 Project Engineer Division of Reactor Projects, Branch 6 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 61 Forsyth Street, SW.
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION EXTENDED POWER UPRATE TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 DOCKET NOS. 50-259 , 50-260 AND 50-296 APLA 28./30.         Confirm that the following success criteria were used to estimate the risk related to the containment overpressure (COP) credit:
Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA  30303-8931 Ms. Beth A. Wetzel, ManagerCorporate Nuclear Licensing and Industry Affairs Tennessee Valley Authority 4X Blue Ridge 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN  37402-2801Mr. William D. Crouch, ManagerLicensing and Industry Affairs Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL 35609Senior Resident InspectorU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant 10833 Shaw Road
Initiator              Injection            NPSH Large Break Loss      1 core spray (CS)    3 or 4 residual heat removal (RHR) pumps/heat of coolant            pump                exchanges (H/Xs) aligned to spent fuel pool Accident (LLOCA)                            cooling (SPC) or or 1 Low Pressure Core Injection      2 RHR pumps/HXs aligned to SPC and favorable (LPCI) pump          plant conditions (initial SP volume at 123,500 ft3, river water temperature at 85 degrees F, torus water temperature less than or equal to 86 degrees F) or 2 pumps/HXs aligned to SPC and containment integrity (COP credit)
Note: 1 pump/HX aligned to SPC and containment integrity (COP credit) will not provide adequate NPSH to the low pressure emergency core cooling system (ECCS) pumps during LLOCAs Anticipated            1 CS pump            containment integrity (COP credit)
Transient Without Scram (ATWS)          or                  Note: Does not depend on the number of RHR or                                          pumps/HXs aligned to SPC Station Blackout      1 LPCI pump (SBO) (upon AC power recovery after 4 hours)
Enclosure


Athens, AL 35611-6970State Health OfficerAlabama Dept. of Public Health RSA Tower - Administration 
Other transients      1 CS pump            2 or more RHR pumps/HXs aligned to SPC or                  or 1 LPCI pump          1 pump/HX aligned to SPC and containment integrity (COP credit) 29./31.      Describe any interlocks or procedural prohibitions that preclude the simultaneous opening of the LPCI valves, SPC valves, and/or drywell spray valves in the same RHR subsystem.
30./32.      The licensee has made a commitment to terminate drywell cooling within two of entry into the Appendix R fire safe shutdown operating procedures. Address how this commitment was considered during development of the probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) success criteria.
31./33.      The SPC mode is manually aligned by the operator. Describe how the operator decides the number of RHR pumps/HXs to align to SPC. Address whether it is credible (e.g., within procedural guidance) that the operator would actually align three or four RHR pumps/HXs to SPC.
32./34.      Determine if there is a significant statistical correlation between the suppression pool water level, river water temperature, and/or torus water temperature.
33./35.      Discuss whether it is possible to eliminate or substantially reduce the need for the COP credit by maximizing the suppression pool water level, minimizing the initial torus water temperature and/or reducing the amount of power uprate.
34./36.      Provide the approximate high confidence of low probability of failure (HCLPF) of the Browns Ferry containment structure (including considerations of personnel access or equipment hatches, penetrations, etc.).
35./37.      Discuss whether the fire risk evaluation contained in the IPEEE addresses spurious actuations (hot shorts) of the containment isolation valves or the need for the COP credit. If not, address the change in risk considering COP and submit a summary of the updated results.
36./37.      Discuss when and how the peer review for the Unit 1 PRA was conducted (identify the participants, describe what methods were used, etc.), and submit the peer review report. Indicate which comments may significantly affect the PRA results, insights, and conclusions concerning the proposed EPU. Also, discuss the plans and timetable to resolve comments and revise the PRA model.
37./38.      Explain how COP credit maintains the defense-in-depth concept provided Section 2.2.1.1 of Regulatory guide 1.174. Specifically address each of the seven bulleted items with particular emphasis on the fifth item (independence of barriers is not degraded).


Suite 1552 P.O. Box 303017 Montgomery, AL 36130-3017ChairmanLimestone County Commission 310 West Washington Street
SBWB (Unit 1 Only)
: 67. Discuss whether the 3-D MONICORE core monitoring system is based on TGBLA06/PANAC11 methods.
: 68. The 50 megawatt thermal/million pounds mass/hour (MWt/Mlbm/hr) limit establishes the generic envelope for General Electric neutronic methods nodal, bundle and axial power distribution uncertainties. Discuss whether the core thermal power to core flow ratio for the Unit 1 extended power uprate will remain below 50 MWt/Mlbm/hr at any statepoint in the allowed operating domain limit.
: 69. Discuss whether the plant specific R-factor calculation at a bundle level was performed consistent with lattice axial void conditions expected for the hot channel operating state.
: 70. The presence of bypass voiding at the low-flow conditions where instabilities are likely can result in calibration errors. Discuss whether these calibration errors were accounted for when determining the setpoints for the detect and suppress long term methodology.
(Units 2 and 3 Only)
: 82. Provide the reference and/or description of the models governing counter-current flow (CCFL) at the exit to the hot bundle/core. Also identify the reference that describes the validation (separate effects and integral test data comparisons) of the CCFL limit model governing top down cooling in rod bundles.
: 83. Provide the vapor and liquid hot bundle exit velocities versus time for the 0.05 ft2 breaks presented in the April 18, 2007, SBWB-64 Supplement response.
: 84. Provide the axial power shapes used in the calculations provided in the April 18, 2007, request for additional information response.


Athens, AL 35611Mr. Robert H. Bryan, Jr., General ManagerLicensing and Industry Affairs Tennessee Valley Authority 4X Blue Ridge 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801}}
William R. Campbell, Jr.                  BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT Tennessee Valley Authority cc:
Mr. Ashok S. Bhatnagar                  Decatur, AL 35609 Senior Vice President                    Mr. Robert G. Jones, General Manager Nuclear Generation Development          Browns Ferry Site Operations and Construction                      Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority              Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place                        P.O. Box 2000 1101 Market Street                      Decatur, AL 35609 Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Mr. Larry S. Mellen Mr. Preston D. Swafford                  Browns Ferry Unit 1 Project Engineer Senior Vice President                    Division of Reactor Projects, Branch 6 Nuclear Support                          U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Tennessee Valley Authority              61 Forsyth Street, SW.
6A Lookout Place                        Suite 23T85 1101 Market Street                      Atlanta, GA 30303-8931 Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Ms. Beth A. Wetzel, Manager Mr. Walter M. Justice II                Corporate Nuclear Licensing Interim Vice President                      and Industry Affairs Nuclear Engineering & Technical Services Tennessee Valley Authority Tennessee Valley Authority              4X Blue Ridge 6A Lookout Place                        1101 Market Street 1101 Market Street                      Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Mr. William D. Crouch, Manager Brian OGrady, Site Vice President      Licensing and Industry Affairs Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant              Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority              Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000                            P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL 35609                        Decatur, AL 35609 General Counsel                          Senior Resident Inspector Tennessee Valley Authority              U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ET 11A                                  Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant 400 West Summit Hill Drive              10833 Shaw Road Knoxville, TN 37902                      Athens, AL 35611-6970 Mr. John C. Fornicola, General Manager  State Health Officer Nuclear Assurance                        Alabama Dept. of Public Health Tennessee Valley Authority              RSA Tower - Administration 6A Lookout Place                        Suite 1552 1101 Market Street                      P.O. Box 303017 Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801              Montgomery, AL 36130-3017 Mr. Bruce Aukland, Plant Manager        Chairman Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant              Limestone County Commission Tennessee Valley Authority              310 West Washington Street P.O. Box 2000                            Athens, AL 35611 Decatur, AL 35609 Mr. Robert H. Bryan, Jr., General Manager Mr. Masoud Bajestani, Vice President    Licensing and Industry Affairs Browns Ferry Unit 1 Restart              Tennessee Valley Authority Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant              4X Blue Ridge Tennessee Valley Authority              1101 Market Street P.O. Box 2000                            Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801}}

Revision as of 06:01, 23 November 2019

Request for Additional Information for Extended Power Uprate - Round 13 (TS-431 and TS-418 (TAC Nos. MD5262, MD5263, and MD5264)
ML071780190
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 07/05/2007
From: Ellen Brown
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLII-2
To: Campbell W
Tennessee Valley Authority
Brown Eva, NRR/DORL, 415-2315
References
TAC MD5262, TAC MD5263, TAC MD5264
Download: ML071780190 (4)


Text

July 05, 2007 Mr. William R. Campbell Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801

SUBJECT:

BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR EXTENDED POWER UPRATE - ROUND 13 (TS-431-S AND TS-418) (TAC NOS. MD5262, MD5263, AND MD5264)

Dear Mr. Campbell:

By letters dated June 28 and 25, 2004, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA, the licensee) submitted amendment requests for Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN), Units 1, 2 and 3, as supplemented by letters dated August 23, 2004, February 23, April 25, June 6, and December 19, 2005, February 1 and 28, March 7, 9, 23 and 31, April 13, May 5 and 11, June 12, 15, 23 and 27, July 6, 21, 24, 26, and 31, December 1, 5, 11 and 21, 2006, January 31, February 16, and 26, and April 6, 18 and 24, 2007.

The proposed amendments would change the BFN operating licenses for Units 1, 2 and 3 to increase the maximum authorized power level by approximately 15 percent. In a letter dated November 7, 2006, TVA reported changes in the modeling used to determine compliance with emergency core cooling system requirements. The enclosed Request for Additional Information is related to this submittal.

A response to the enclosed Request for Additional Information is needed before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff can complete the review. This request was discussed with Mr. David Langley of your staff on June 4, 2007, and it was agreed that TVA would respond within 30 days of issuance of this letter.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2315.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Eva A. Brown, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-259, 50-260 and 50-296

Enclosure:

Request for Additional Information cc w/enclosure: See next page

ML071780190 NRR-088 OFFICE LPL2-2/PM LPL2-2/LA DSS/SBWB/BC DRA/APLA/BC LPL2-2/BC NAME EBrown BClayton GCranston MRubin TBoyce DATE 07 / 05 /07 07 / 02 /07 07 / 05 /07 06 / 29 /07 07/ 05 /07

Letter to William R. Campbell, Jr. from Eva A. Brown dated July 5, 2007

SUBJECT:

BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR EXTENDED POWER UPRATE - ROUND 13 (TS-431-S AND TS-418) (TAC NOS. MD5262, MD5263 AND MD5264)

DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC LPL2-2 R/F RidsNrrDorlLpl2-2 RidsNrrPMEBrown RidsNrrLABClayton (Hard Copy)

RidsNrrDorlDpr RidsNrrDssSbwb (GCranston)

RidsNrrDraApla (MRubin)

RidsNrrPMTAlexion RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter RidsOgcRp THuang MRazzaque TNakanishi LWard MLobel MStutzke

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION EXTENDED POWER UPRATE TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1, 2 AND 3 DOCKET NOS. 50-259 , 50-260 AND 50-296 APLA 28./30. Confirm that the following success criteria were used to estimate the risk related to the containment overpressure (COP) credit:

Initiator Injection NPSH Large Break Loss 1 core spray (CS) 3 or 4 residual heat removal (RHR) pumps/heat of coolant pump exchanges (H/Xs) aligned to spent fuel pool Accident (LLOCA) cooling (SPC) or or 1 Low Pressure Core Injection 2 RHR pumps/HXs aligned to SPC and favorable (LPCI) pump plant conditions (initial SP volume at 123,500 ft3, river water temperature at 85 degrees F, torus water temperature less than or equal to 86 degrees F) or 2 pumps/HXs aligned to SPC and containment integrity (COP credit)

Note: 1 pump/HX aligned to SPC and containment integrity (COP credit) will not provide adequate NPSH to the low pressure emergency core cooling system (ECCS) pumps during LLOCAs Anticipated 1 CS pump containment integrity (COP credit)

Transient Without Scram (ATWS) or Note: Does not depend on the number of RHR or pumps/HXs aligned to SPC Station Blackout 1 LPCI pump (SBO) (upon AC power recovery after 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />)

Enclosure

Other transients 1 CS pump 2 or more RHR pumps/HXs aligned to SPC or or 1 LPCI pump 1 pump/HX aligned to SPC and containment integrity (COP credit) 29./31. Describe any interlocks or procedural prohibitions that preclude the simultaneous opening of the LPCI valves, SPC valves, and/or drywell spray valves in the same RHR subsystem.

30./32. The licensee has made a commitment to terminate drywell cooling within two of entry into the Appendix R fire safe shutdown operating procedures. Address how this commitment was considered during development of the probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) success criteria.

31./33. The SPC mode is manually aligned by the operator. Describe how the operator decides the number of RHR pumps/HXs to align to SPC. Address whether it is credible (e.g., within procedural guidance) that the operator would actually align three or four RHR pumps/HXs to SPC.

32./34. Determine if there is a significant statistical correlation between the suppression pool water level, river water temperature, and/or torus water temperature.

33./35. Discuss whether it is possible to eliminate or substantially reduce the need for the COP credit by maximizing the suppression pool water level, minimizing the initial torus water temperature and/or reducing the amount of power uprate.

34./36. Provide the approximate high confidence of low probability of failure (HCLPF) of the Browns Ferry containment structure (including considerations of personnel access or equipment hatches, penetrations, etc.).

35./37. Discuss whether the fire risk evaluation contained in the IPEEE addresses spurious actuations (hot shorts) of the containment isolation valves or the need for the COP credit. If not, address the change in risk considering COP and submit a summary of the updated results.

36./37. Discuss when and how the peer review for the Unit 1 PRA was conducted (identify the participants, describe what methods were used, etc.), and submit the peer review report. Indicate which comments may significantly affect the PRA results, insights, and conclusions concerning the proposed EPU. Also, discuss the plans and timetable to resolve comments and revise the PRA model.

37./38. Explain how COP credit maintains the defense-in-depth concept provided Section 2.2.1.1 of Regulatory guide 1.174. Specifically address each of the seven bulleted items with particular emphasis on the fifth item (independence of barriers is not degraded).

SBWB (Unit 1 Only)

67. Discuss whether the 3-D MONICORE core monitoring system is based on TGBLA06/PANAC11 methods.
68. The 50 megawatt thermal/million pounds mass/hour (MWt/Mlbm/hr) limit establishes the generic envelope for General Electric neutronic methods nodal, bundle and axial power distribution uncertainties. Discuss whether the core thermal power to core flow ratio for the Unit 1 extended power uprate will remain below 50 MWt/Mlbm/hr at any statepoint in the allowed operating domain limit.
69. Discuss whether the plant specific R-factor calculation at a bundle level was performed consistent with lattice axial void conditions expected for the hot channel operating state.
70. The presence of bypass voiding at the low-flow conditions where instabilities are likely can result in calibration errors. Discuss whether these calibration errors were accounted for when determining the setpoints for the detect and suppress long term methodology.

(Units 2 and 3 Only)

82. Provide the reference and/or description of the models governing counter-current flow (CCFL) at the exit to the hot bundle/core. Also identify the reference that describes the validation (separate effects and integral test data comparisons) of the CCFL limit model governing top down cooling in rod bundles.
83. Provide the vapor and liquid hot bundle exit velocities versus time for the 0.05 ft2 breaks presented in the April 18, 2007, SBWB-64 Supplement response.
84. Provide the axial power shapes used in the calculations provided in the April 18, 2007, request for additional information response.

William R. Campbell, Jr. BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT Tennessee Valley Authority cc:

Mr. Ashok S. Bhatnagar Decatur, AL 35609 Senior Vice President Mr. Robert G. Jones, General Manager Nuclear Generation Development Browns Ferry Site Operations and Construction Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place P.O. Box 2000 1101 Market Street Decatur, AL 35609 Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Mr. Larry S. Mellen Mr. Preston D. Swafford Browns Ferry Unit 1 Project Engineer Senior Vice President Division of Reactor Projects, Branch 6 Nuclear Support U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Tennessee Valley Authority 61 Forsyth Street, SW.

6A Lookout Place Suite 23T85 1101 Market Street Atlanta, GA 30303-8931 Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Ms. Beth A. Wetzel, Manager Mr. Walter M. Justice II Corporate Nuclear Licensing Interim Vice President and Industry Affairs Nuclear Engineering & Technical Services Tennessee Valley Authority Tennessee Valley Authority 4X Blue Ridge 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Mr. William D. Crouch, Manager Brian OGrady, Site Vice President Licensing and Industry Affairs Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL 35609 Decatur, AL 35609 General Counsel Senior Resident Inspector Tennessee Valley Authority U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ET 11A Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant 400 West Summit Hill Drive 10833 Shaw Road Knoxville, TN 37902 Athens, AL 35611-6970 Mr. John C. Fornicola, General Manager State Health Officer Nuclear Assurance Alabama Dept. of Public Health Tennessee Valley Authority RSA Tower - Administration 6A Lookout Place Suite 1552 1101 Market Street P.O. Box 303017 Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Montgomery, AL 36130-3017 Mr. Bruce Aukland, Plant Manager Chairman Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Limestone County Commission Tennessee Valley Authority 310 West Washington Street P.O. Box 2000 Athens, AL 35611 Decatur, AL 35609 Mr. Robert H. Bryan, Jr., General Manager Mr. Masoud Bajestani, Vice President Licensing and Industry Affairs Browns Ferry Unit 1 Restart Tennessee Valley Authority Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant 4X Blue Ridge Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street P.O. Box 2000 Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801