ML17341A875: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:P.O.BOX 529100 MIAMI, F L 33152 USNFlc REG'ION:I ATLANTA, GEORGIA 8p JAN l8 P l;57 FLORIDA POWER Ss LIGHT COMPANY January 15, 1982 L-82-15 Mr.James P.O'ei 1 ly Regional Administrator, Region II U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303  
{{#Wiki_filter:P.O. BOX 529100 MIAMI,F L 33152 USNFlc REG'ION:I ATLANTA, GEORGIA FLORIDA POWER      LIGHT COMPANY l;
Ss 8p JAN l8     P     57 January 15, 1982 L-82-15 Mr . James   P. O'ei ly1 Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite         3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303


==Dear Mr.O'Reilly:==
==Dear Mr. O'Reilly:==
Re: Turkey Points Units 3 5 4 Docket Nos.50-250, 50-251 IE In~sectio~nRe ort 81-28 Florida Power 8 Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection report and a response is attached.There is no proprietary information in the report.Very truly yours, ,z Y~rt E.Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems 8 Technology REU/PLP/ras cc: Harold F.Reis, Esquire 8~02i6O67S ea020S PDR ADOCK 05000250', 8 PDR PEOPLE...SERVING PEOPLE  
 
~~~~I.pl h 4 1~~ATTACHMENT RE: TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 5 4 DOCKET NOS.50-250, 50-251 IE INSPECTION REPORT 81-28 FINDING: Technical Specification 6.8.1 requires the licensee to establi'sh and implement procedures that meet the requirements and recommendations of ANSI N18.7-1972 and Appendix"A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33.Contrary to the above, while the reactor head was removed for refueling, the licensee did not implement two procedures in accordance with the requirements of ANSI N18.7-1972.1.Operating Procedure 16200 requires items that could fa'jl into the reactor to be kept off the manipulator crane and clear of the reactor cavity.On November 17, 1981, miscellaneous, untethered tools and materials were observed on the manipulator crane.2.equality Procedure 2.10 requires material accountability to be applied when misplaced items could be detrimental to the safety function of a system.On November 17, 1981, a system of material accountability had not been established for items entering the refueling area.RESPONSE: 1.FPL concurs with the finding.2.FPL did not previously, interpret equality Procedure 2.10 to require material accountability to be necessary in the refueling area.3.The immediate problem was resolved when refueling was completed.
Re:   Turkey Points Units 3 5 4 Docket Nos. 50-250, 50-251 IE In~sectio~nRe ort 81-28 Florida   Power 8 Light   Company has reviewed the subject inspection report and a response     is attached.
4.In order to pr event recurrence, FPL wi 1 1 impl ement a materi al.accountability program as required by guality Procedure 2.10.5.Full compliance will be achieved prior to the post steam generator repair fuel loading on Unit 3.(Which is now scheduled for February 20, 1982).FINDING: Paragraph 14.2.1 of the Final Safety Analysis Report states that assumptions used for a fuel handling accident in the spent fuel pit are conservative because the auxiliary building doors are closed during movement of spent fuel.Contrary to the above, during fuel handling operations on November 17, 1981, doors which lead from the spent fuel pit directly to the outside atmosphere were propped open.  
There   is no proprietary information in the report.
'4l I.E.INSPECTION REPORT 81-28 (Continued)
Very truly yours,
~~Page 2 RESPONSE: FPL will perform a safety evaluation of the spent fuel pit doors being open during movement of spent fuel.If the safety evaluation demonstrates that keeping the doors open during spent fuel movement does not involve any unrevi ewed safety questions, FPL will cunti nue our current practice.If not, we wi 11 modify our current practice to remedy the unreviewed safety question.The doors will be closed while moving spent fuel into or out of containment pending completion of the safety evaluation.
                  ,z Y~
c 4 STATE OF FLORIDA))COUNTY OF DADE)Jack E.Vessely being first, duly sworn, deposes and says: That he is Director of Nuclear Affairs Light Company, the heres.n;of Florida Power&That he has executed the foregoing document;that the state-ments made in this said document are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief, and that he is authorized to execute the document on behalf of said J ck E.Vessely I/S g~Subscribed and sworn to before me this.<'-'/5 day of 4 n 4 I 4 19~/.,: NO.rgARY,, P,UBLI C r ,State ol Florida and for the County of Dade, My commission expires: Notary Public, State of Florida at Large My Commhsion Expfrea October 30,-1983 Bonded thru Ma nard Bondin A enc 0 r h~E l}}
rt   E. Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems     8   Technology REU/PLP/ras cc:   Harold F. Reis, Esquire 8~02i6O67S ea020S PDR ADOCK 05000250
', 8                 PDR PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE
 
            ~
        ~
              ~
          ~
I.
pl h 4
 
1
~ ~
ATTACHMENT RE:   TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 5 4 DOCKET NOS. 50-250, 50-251 IE INSPECTION REPORT 81-28 FINDING:
Technical Specification 6.8. 1 requires the licensee to establi'sh and implement procedures that meet the requirements and recommendations of ANSI N18.7 - 1972 and Appendix "A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33.
Contrary to the above, while the reactor head was removed for refueling, the licensee did not implement two procedures in accordance with the requirements of ANSI N18.7   - 1972.
: 1. Operating Procedure 16200 requires items that could fa'jl into the reactor to be kept off the manipulator crane and clear of the reactor cavity.
equality                                                                      On November 17, 1981, miscellaneous,       untethered tools and materials were observed on the manipulator crane.
: 2.             Procedure 2.10 requires material accountability to be applied when   misplaced items could be detrimental to the safety function of a system. On November 17, 1981, a system of material       accountability had not been established for items entering the refueling area.
 
===RESPONSE===
: 1. FPL concurs with the finding.
: 2. FPL did not previously, interpret       equality Procedure 2. 10 to require material accountability to be necessary in the refueling area.
: 3. The immediate problem was   resolved when refueling   was completed.
: 4. In order to pr event       recurrence,   FPL   wi 1 1 impl ement a   materi al.
accountability program as required by guality Procedure 2.10.
: 5. Full compliance will be achieved prior to the post steam generator repair fuel loading on Unit 3. (Which is now scheduled for February 20, 1982).
FINDING:
Paragraph   14.2. 1 of the Final Safety Analysis Report states that assumptions used for a fuel handling accident in the spent fuel pit are conservative because the auxiliary building doors are closed during movement of spent fuel.
Contrary to the above, during fuel handling operations on November 17, 1981, doors which lead from the spent fuel pit directly to the outside atmosphere were propped open.
 
  '
4 l
 
I.E.
~  ~ INSPECTION REPORT 81-28 (Continued)
Page 2
 
===RESPONSE===
FPL will perform a safety evaluation of the spent fuel pit doors being open during movement of spent fuel.     If the safety evaluation demonstrates that keeping the doors open during spent fuel movement does not involve any unrevi ewed safety questions, FPL will cunti nue our current practice. If not, we wi 11   modify our current practice to remedy the unreviewed safety question. The doors will be closed while moving spent fuel into or out of containment pending completion of the safety evaluation.
 
c 4
 
STATE OF FLORIDA           )
                                  )
COUNTY OF DADE             )
Jack E. Vessely             being     first, duly         sworn, deposes     and says:
That he     is Director of Nuclear Affairs                         of Florida  Power  &
Light   Company,     the               heres.n; That he has executed the foregoing document; that the state-ments made in this said document are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief, and that he is authorized to execute the document on behalf of said I /S g~
J ck E. Vessely Subscribed and sworn to before                 me   this
  .<'-'/5         day of                                           19~/
4 n
4   I 4
  .,:   NO.rgARY,, P,UBLI C r     and for the       County of Dade,
    ,State ol Florida Notary Public, State of Florida at Large My Commhsion Expfrea October 30,-1983 My    commission expires:        Bonded thru Ma nard Bondin A enc
 
0     r h
  ~E l}}

Revision as of 10:38, 22 October 2019

Responds to NRC 811204 Ltr Re Violation & Deviation Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-250/81-28 & 50-251/81-28.Corrective Actions:Matl Accountability Program Will Be Implemented & Safety Evaluation of Spent Fuel Pit Doors Will Be Performed
ML17341A875
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/15/1982
From: Robert E. Uhrig
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML17341A874 List:
References
L-82-15, NUDOCS 8202160671
Download: ML17341A875 (8)


Text

P.O. BOX 529100 MIAMI,F L 33152 USNFlc REG'ION:I ATLANTA, GEORGIA FLORIDA POWER LIGHT COMPANY l;

Ss 8p JAN l8 P 57 January 15, 1982 L-82-15 Mr . James P. O'ei ly1 Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

Re: Turkey Points Units 3 5 4 Docket Nos. 50-250, 50-251 IE In~sectio~nRe ort 81-28 Florida Power 8 Light Company has reviewed the subject inspection report and a response is attached.

There is no proprietary information in the report.

Very truly yours,

,z Y~

rt E. Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems 8 Technology REU/PLP/ras cc: Harold F. Reis, Esquire 8~02i6O67S ea020S PDR ADOCK 05000250

', 8 PDR PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE

~

~

~

~

I.

pl h 4

1

~ ~

ATTACHMENT RE: TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 5 4 DOCKET NOS. 50-250, 50-251 IE INSPECTION REPORT 81-28 FINDING:

Technical Specification 6.8. 1 requires the licensee to establi'sh and implement procedures that meet the requirements and recommendations of ANSI N18.7 - 1972 and Appendix "A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33.

Contrary to the above, while the reactor head was removed for refueling, the licensee did not implement two procedures in accordance with the requirements of ANSI N18.7 - 1972.

1. Operating Procedure 16200 requires items that could fa'jl into the reactor to be kept off the manipulator crane and clear of the reactor cavity.

equality On November 17, 1981, miscellaneous, untethered tools and materials were observed on the manipulator crane.

2. Procedure 2.10 requires material accountability to be applied when misplaced items could be detrimental to the safety function of a system. On November 17, 1981, a system of material accountability had not been established for items entering the refueling area.

RESPONSE

1. FPL concurs with the finding.
2. FPL did not previously, interpret equality Procedure 2. 10 to require material accountability to be necessary in the refueling area.
3. The immediate problem was resolved when refueling was completed.
4. In order to pr event recurrence, FPL wi 1 1 impl ement a materi al.

accountability program as required by guality Procedure 2.10.

5. Full compliance will be achieved prior to the post steam generator repair fuel loading on Unit 3. (Which is now scheduled for February 20, 1982).

FINDING:

Paragraph 14.2. 1 of the Final Safety Analysis Report states that assumptions used for a fuel handling accident in the spent fuel pit are conservative because the auxiliary building doors are closed during movement of spent fuel.

Contrary to the above, during fuel handling operations on November 17, 1981, doors which lead from the spent fuel pit directly to the outside atmosphere were propped open.

'

4 l

I.E.

~ ~ INSPECTION REPORT 81-28 (Continued)

Page 2

RESPONSE

FPL will perform a safety evaluation of the spent fuel pit doors being open during movement of spent fuel. If the safety evaluation demonstrates that keeping the doors open during spent fuel movement does not involve any unrevi ewed safety questions, FPL will cunti nue our current practice. If not, we wi 11 modify our current practice to remedy the unreviewed safety question. The doors will be closed while moving spent fuel into or out of containment pending completion of the safety evaluation.

c 4

STATE OF FLORIDA )

)

COUNTY OF DADE )

Jack E. Vessely being first, duly sworn, deposes and says:

That he is Director of Nuclear Affairs of Florida Power &

Light Company, the heres.n; That he has executed the foregoing document; that the state-ments made in this said document are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief, and that he is authorized to execute the document on behalf of said I /S g~

J ck E. Vessely Subscribed and sworn to before me this

.<'-'/5 day of 19~/

4 n

4 I 4

.,: NO.rgARY,, P,UBLI C r and for the County of Dade,

,State ol Florida Notary Public, State of Florida at Large My Commhsion Expfrea October 30,-1983 My commission expires: Bonded thru Ma nard Bondin A enc

0 r h

~E l