ML17348A432: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 07/11/1990
| issue date = 07/11/1990
| title = Forwards Rev 8 to Updated FSAR for Turkey Point Units 3 & 4. Rev Includes Activities Completed Between 890123 & 900122. Rept of Changes for Jul 1989 Through June 1990 Will Be Provided by 900901
| title = Forwards Rev 8 to Updated FSAR for Turkey Point Units 3 & 4. Rev Includes Activities Completed Between 890123 & 900122. Rept of Changes for Jul 1989 Through June 1990 Will Be Provided by 900901
| author name = HARRIS K N
| author name = Harris K
| author affiliation = FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
| author affiliation = FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:P.O.Box14000, Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 L-90-248 10 CFR 50.71 gUtiy, 11 1990 Gentlemen:
{{#Wiki_filter:P.O. Box14000, Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 L-90-248 10 CFR 50.71 gUtiy,  11    1990 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:
Re: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos.50-250 and 50-251 FSAR U date Revision 8 Florida Power&Light Company has completed the annual update of the Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR).In accordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e), Revision 8 to the updated FSAR is hereby submitted.
Re:     Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 FSAR U date Revision 8 Florida Power & Light Company has completed the annual update of the Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR).
As specified in 10 CFR 50.4(b)(6), ten additional copies of the revision are enclosed.I The enclosed information accurately presents changes made since the previous submittal.
In accordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e), Revision 8 to the updated FSAR is hereby submitted. As specified in 10 CFR 50.4(b)(6), ten additional copies of the revision are enclosed.
This revision includes activities completed between January 23, 1989 and January 22, 1990.Our report of changes made under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.59 for the period of July 1, 1989 through June 30, 1990 will be provided by September 1, 1990.Very truly yours, K..rris Vic President Tur ey Point Nuclear Plant KNH/TCG/sh
I The enclosed information accurately presents changes made since the previous submittal. This revision includes activities completed between January 23, 1989 and January 22, 1990.
Our report of changes           made under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.59 for the period of July 1,             1989 through June 30, 1990 will be provided by September 1, 1990.
Very   truly     yours, K.   . rris Vic President Tur ey Point Nuclear Plant a
ilgwu KNH/TCG/sh


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
FSAR    Update Revision  8 (11 copies) cc:    Stewart Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant 07 rgggi6 90000250 PDR    ADDCK P50        @DR an FPL Group company


FSAR Update Revision 8 (11 copies)a ilgwu cc: Stewart Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant 07 rgggi6 90000250 PDR ADDCK P50@DR an FPL Group company r~4 1~1 SITE AND ENVIRONMENT The site is on the shore of Biscayne Bay, about 25 miles s 1th of Miami, orida.The area immediately surrounding the site is lo and swampy and is ver sparsely populated, with much of it unsuited for d elopment without raisin the elevation with fill.The nearest farming rea lies in the northwest quarter of a Smile arc from the site.The area surro ding the site is flat and slopes v ry gently to the west from sea level at the horeline of Biscayne Bay to an elevation of about 10 ft above MSL at a poin some 8 to 10 miles inland.To the east across Biscayne Bay from 5 to 8 miles, is a series of offshore islands running in a northeast-southwest direction bet.en the Bay and the lantic Ocean, the largest of which is Elliott Key.The site is well ventilated wi air move ent prevailing almost 100 percent of the time.The atmosphere in the rea is generally unstable with diurnal inversions of short duration.1.1-1 The Miami area has experienced winds f urricane force periodically.
r~
During storms the plant may be subjected t flood tides of varying heights.The two nuclear-electric generating units this si are constructed on compacted limerock fill to an elevation of 8 feet abov MLW, and protected against wave runup to an elevation of+2 feet above MLW n the east side (+22.5 MLW at the Intake Structure).
4
The emaining areas are rotected to 20 feet above HLW which is well above any erienced or predictab e flood tides.Hurrican~C"Betsy" in 1965 produced the maximum flooding recorded which was about 10 feet above MSL.The normal direction of tural drainage of surface and gro d water in t e area of the site is to he east and south toward Biscayne Bay nd will not affect off-site walls A radiological background study of the rkey Point Q ,'-a Q Rev 7 7/89 area will be initiated approximately one year prior to initial startup of the Unit 3.This will involve the collection of samples of air;soil, water, marine life', biota and vegetation in" the area.The bed rock beneath the limerock fill is competent with respect to foundation conditions for the nuclear units.The area is in a seismologically quiet region all of Florida being classified Zone 0 (the zone of least probability of damage)by the Uniform Building Code, as'published by International Conference of Building Officials.}}
 
1~1       SITE AND ENVIRONMENT The site is   on the shore of Biscayne   Bay, about 25 miles s   1th of Miami, orida. The   area immediately surrounding the site is lo and swampy and       is ver sparsely populated, with much of       it unsuited for d elopment without raisin the elevation with     fill. The nearest farming rea lies in the northwest quarter of a Smile arc from the site.
The area surro ding the site is flat and slopes v ry gently to the west from sea level at the horeline of Biscayne Bay to an elevation of about 10         ft above MSL at a poin some 8 to 10 miles inland. To the east across Biscayne Bay from 5 to 8 miles, is a series of offshore islands running in a northeast-southwest direction bet. en the Bay and the           lantic Ocean, the largest of which is Elliott Key.
The   site is well ventilated wi air move ent prevailing almost 100 percent of the time. The atmosphere in the rea is generally unstable with diurnal inversions of short duration.
The Miami area has experienced     winds   f   urricane force periodically. During storms the plant may be subjected t flood tides of varying heights. The two nuclear-electric generating units         this si are constructed on compacted limerock   fill   to an elevation of 8 feet abov MLW, and protected against wave runup to an elevation of +2 feet above MLW n the east side (+22.5 MLW at the Intake Structure). The emaining areas are rotected to 20 feet above HLW which is well above any         erienced or predictab e flood tides. Hurrican~C "Betsy" in 1965 produced the maximum flooding recorded which was about 10 feet above MSL.
The normal   direction of   tural drainage of surface     and gro d water in t e area of the site is to     he east and south toward Biscayne Bay nd will not affect off-site walls       A radiological background study of the       rkey Point Q
                                                                              ,'-a Q
1.1-1                        Rev 7 7/89
 
area will be initiated approximately one year prior to initial startup of the Unit 3. This will involve the collection of samples of air; soil, water, marine life', biota and vegetation in" the area. The bed rock beneath the limerock fillis    competent with respect to foundation conditions   for the nuclear units. The area is in a seismologically quiet region   all of Florida being classified   Zone 0 (the zone of least probability of   damage) by the Uniform Building Code, as 'published by     International Conference of Building Officials.}}

Latest revision as of 09:05, 22 October 2019

Forwards Rev 8 to Updated FSAR for Turkey Point Units 3 & 4. Rev Includes Activities Completed Between 890123 & 900122. Rept of Changes for Jul 1989 Through June 1990 Will Be Provided by 900901
ML17348A432
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/11/1990
From: Harris K
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML17348A410 List:
References
L-90-248, NUDOCS 9007260116
Download: ML17348A432 (4)


Text

P.O. Box14000, Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 L-90-248 10 CFR 50.71 gUtiy, 11 1990 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Gentlemen:

Re: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 FSAR U date Revision 8 Florida Power & Light Company has completed the annual update of the Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR).

In accordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e), Revision 8 to the updated FSAR is hereby submitted. As specified in 10 CFR 50.4(b)(6), ten additional copies of the revision are enclosed.

I The enclosed information accurately presents changes made since the previous submittal. This revision includes activities completed between January 23, 1989 and January 22, 1990.

Our report of changes made under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.59 for the period of July 1, 1989 through June 30, 1990 will be provided by September 1, 1990.

Very truly yours, K. . rris Vic President Tur ey Point Nuclear Plant a

ilgwu KNH/TCG/sh

Enclosure:

FSAR Update Revision 8 (11 copies) cc: Stewart Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Plant 07 rgggi6 90000250 PDR ADDCK P50 @DR an FPL Group company

r~

4

1~1 SITE AND ENVIRONMENT The site is on the shore of Biscayne Bay, about 25 miles s 1th of Miami, orida. The area immediately surrounding the site is lo and swampy and is ver sparsely populated, with much of it unsuited for d elopment without raisin the elevation with fill. The nearest farming rea lies in the northwest quarter of a Smile arc from the site.

The area surro ding the site is flat and slopes v ry gently to the west from sea level at the horeline of Biscayne Bay to an elevation of about 10 ft above MSL at a poin some 8 to 10 miles inland. To the east across Biscayne Bay from 5 to 8 miles, is a series of offshore islands running in a northeast-southwest direction bet. en the Bay and the lantic Ocean, the largest of which is Elliott Key.

The site is well ventilated wi air move ent prevailing almost 100 percent of the time. The atmosphere in the rea is generally unstable with diurnal inversions of short duration.

The Miami area has experienced winds f urricane force periodically. During storms the plant may be subjected t flood tides of varying heights. The two nuclear-electric generating units this si are constructed on compacted limerock fill to an elevation of 8 feet abov MLW, and protected against wave runup to an elevation of +2 feet above MLW n the east side (+22.5 MLW at the Intake Structure). The emaining areas are rotected to 20 feet above HLW which is well above any erienced or predictab e flood tides. Hurrican~C "Betsy" in 1965 produced the maximum flooding recorded which was about 10 feet above MSL.

The normal direction of tural drainage of surface and gro d water in t e area of the site is to he east and south toward Biscayne Bay nd will not affect off-site walls A radiological background study of the rkey Point Q

,'-a Q

1.1-1 Rev 7 7/89

area will be initiated approximately one year prior to initial startup of the Unit 3. This will involve the collection of samples of air; soil, water, marine life', biota and vegetation in" the area. The bed rock beneath the limerock fillis competent with respect to foundation conditions for the nuclear units. The area is in a seismologically quiet region all of Florida being classified Zone 0 (the zone of least probability of damage) by the Uniform Building Code, as 'published by International Conference of Building Officials.