ML18005A249: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-1 ACCELHRATZD M BUTION MMONSTRA7ION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATXON DXSTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:8801220203 DOC.DATE: 88/01/14 NOTARIZED-NO FACIL:50-400 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Carolina AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION SCHWABENBAUER Carolina Power&Light;Co.WATSON,R.A.
{{#Wiki_filter:- 1 ACCELHRATZD           M     BUTION         MMONSTRA7ION             SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATXON DXSTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
Carolina Power 6 Light Co.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DQCKET 05000400 9 0500040 NOTES:Application for permit renewal filed.
ACCESSION NBR:8801220203       DOC.DATE: 88/01/14       NOTARIZED- NO         DQCKET FACIL:50-400 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Carolina             05000400 AUTH. NAME         AUTHOR AFFILIATION SCHWABENBAUER       Carolina Power   &   Light; Co.
WATSON,R.A.         Carolina Power   6   Light Co.
RECIP.NAME         RECIPIENT AFFILIATION


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
LER 87-067-00:on 871214,containment ventilation isolation:-due to spurious high radiation alarm while sampling.W/8 ltr.DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR L ENCL SIZE: TITLE: 50.73 Licensee Event Report, (LER), Incident Rpt, et:c.RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-1 LA BUCKLEY,B INTERNAL: ACRS MICHELSON AEOD/DOA AEOD/DSP/ROAB ARM/DCTS/DAB NRR/DEST/ADS NRR/DEST/ELB NRR/DES T/MEB NRR/DEST/PSB NRR/DEST/SGB NRR/DLPQ/QAB NRR/DREP/RAB RZ SIB G F 02 RES/DE/EIB RGN2 FILE 01 EXTERNAL EGGG GROH i M H ST LOBBY WARD NRC PDR NSIC MAYS,G COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1-1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-1 PD ACRS MOELLER AEOD/DS P/NAS AEOD/DSP/TPAB DEDRO NRR/DEST/CEB NRR/DEST/ICSB NRR/DE ST/MTB NRR/DEST/RSB NRR/DLPQ/HFB NRR/DOEA/EAB NRR/DREP/RPB NRR/PMAS/ILRB RES TELFORD,J RES/DRPS DIR FORD BLDG HOY,A LPDR NSIC HARRIS,J COPXES LTTR ENCL 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'1 1 1 1 i R A S A TOTAL NUMBER 0$COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 46 ENCL 45  
LER   87-067-00:on 871214,containment ventilation isolation
:-due to spurious high radiation alarm while sampling.
W/8       ltr.
DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR L ENCL               SIZE:
TITLE: 50.73 Licensee Event Report, (LER), Incident Rpt, et:c.                         9 NOTES:Application for permit renewal filed.                                    0500040 RECIPIENT         COPIES              RECIPIENT        COPXES ID CODE/NAME     LTTR ENCL          ID CODE/NAME    LTTR ENCL PD2-1 LA             1      1      PD2-1 PD              1    1            A BUCKLEY,B             1      1 INTERNAL: ACRS MICHELSON           1      1      ACRS MOELLER          2    2 AEOD/DOA             1      1      AEOD/DS P/NAS          1    1 AEOD/DSP/ROAB         2      2      AEOD/DSP/TPAB          1    1 ARM/DCTS/DAB         1  -
1      DEDRO                1    1 NRR/DEST/ADS         1      0      NRR/DEST/CEB          1    1 NRR/DEST/ELB          1      1      NRR/DEST/ICSB          1    1 NRR/DES T/MEB        1      1      NRR/DE ST/MTB          1   1 NRR/DEST/PSB          1      1      NRR/DEST/RSB          1    1 NRR/DEST/SGB          1      1      NRR/DLPQ/HFB          1    1 NRR/DLPQ/QAB          1      1      NRR/DOEA/EAB           1    1 NRR/DREP/RAB          1      1      NRR/DREP/RPB           2    2 RZ  SIB        1      1      NRR/PMAS/ILRB         1    1 G F          02    1      1      RES TELFORD,J         1    1 RES/DE/EIB            1      1      RES/DRPS DIR           1    1 RGN2    FILE  01    1      1 EXTERNAL    EGGG GROH i M        5      5      FORD BLDG HOY,A       1   1 H ST LOBBY WARD      1       1     LPDR                '1     1 i R NRC PDR              1       1     NSIC HARRIS,J          1   1 NSIC MAYS,G          1       1 S
A TOTAL NUMBER 0$ COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR           46   ENCL   45


NRC Form 388 (949 l LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)US.NUCLEAR AEOULATOAY COMMISSION APPROVEO OMB NO.31500)04 EXPIRES: 8/31/88 FACILITY NAME (I)SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT ONE DOCKET NUMBER (2)PA 5 3 o s o o o 40 0>'OF04 CONTAINMENT VENTILATION ISOLATION DUE TO A SPURIOUS HIGH RADIATION ALAMO WHILE SAMPLING AT MONITOR EVENT DATE (5)LER NUMBER (8)REPORT DATE (7)OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED ISI MONTH OAY YEAR YEAR'SEaUSNTrAL g4 NUMSSA (I(.SA MONTH DAY YEAR FACILITY NAMES DOCKET NUMBERIS)0 5 0 0 0 1 2148 78 7 0 6 7 00 011 488 0'50oo OPERATINO MODE (9)]POIVER LEVEL 0 Vd''V(~s (20.402(b)20405(e)(I)(0 20.405(el(1)(8) 20.405(e I (1)(5 I)20405(e)(I)Or) 20.405(e)('I)(r)20405(cl SOM(c)III SOM(c)(2)50.73(el(2)(I) 50.73(s)(2)(8)50.73(s)(2)
NRC Form 388                                                                                                                                           US. NUCLEAR AEOULATOAYCOMMISSION (949 l APPROVEO OMB NO. 31500)04 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)                                                              EXPIRES: 8/31/88 FACILITY NAME (I)                                                                                                                         DOCKET NUMBER (2)                               PA 5 3 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT                                          UNIT ONE                                                    o     s o o o 40                     0>'OF04 CONTAINMENT VENTILATION ISOLATION DUE TO A SPURIOUS HIGH RADIATION ALAMO WHILE SAMPLING AT MONITOR EVENT DATE (5)                       LER NUMBER (8)                           REPORT DATE (7)                       OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED ISI
IIII)50.7 3(s I (2)(lel 50.734)(2)(rl 50.73(el(2)(rS) 50.73(e)(2)(rllll(AI 50.73(s I 12 I (rI II)(B)50.73(e)(2)(el THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PUASVANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR ('ll fChrcfr onr or more of tire follorflnPI (11)73.71(8)73.71(c)OTHER ISpecify In 48rtrect Oelorernd In Text, IIAC Form 3884)NAME LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)R.SCHWABENBAUER
                                          '  SEaUSNTrAL MONTH     OAY       YEAR     YEAR     g4       NUMSSA     (I(.       SA MONTH         DAY   YEAR             FACILITYNAMES                                DOCKET NUMBERIS) 0   5   0     0   0 1     2148 78                       7       0         6 7         00 011 488 THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PUASVANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR ('ll fChrcfr onr or more 0'50oo OPERATINO                                                                                                                           of tire follorflnPI (11)
-REGULATORY COMPLIANCE TECHICIAN TELEPHONE NUMBER AREA CODE 91 9362-2 669 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT 14ANUFAC.TUR ER EPOATABLE TO NPRDS sc'''CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANU FAC.TVRER'P EPORTABLE'TO NPRDS 2....A...AM.
MODE (9)
r I K SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)EXPECTED SUBMISSION PATE (I SI MONTH OAY YEAR YES Ilf yrr, complrtr EXPECTED SII84IISSION 04TEI NO ABSTRACT IUmlt to 1400 lpeerr, I r., rpproxlmerrly flfrrrn rlnplerprcr ryperrrlrtrn Iinrrl (18)ABSTRACT: The plant was operating in Mode 1, Power Operation, at 99 percent reactor power on December 14, 1987.At 0340 hours while a chemistry technician was obtaining a grab sample from Containment Leak Detection Radiation Monitor, REM-1LT-3502A-SA, a high radiation alarm was generated.
                          ]         20.402(b)                                   20405(cl                        50.7 3(s I (2)(lel                                  73.71(8)
The high radiation alarm generated a containment ventilation isolat:on signal which resulted in the closure of all containment ventilation valves in accordance with plant design.The cause of the alarm was a spurious electronic signal spike.The alarm was cleared, the monitor was verified to be operating correctly, and the containment ventilation normal valve line-up was restored.The grab sample taken when the monitor alarmed was analy ed and found to be within acceptable limits.Actions to prevent recurrence are.'grab sample lines have been clearly labeled to ensure correct hook-up, sampling frequencies have been reduced, and a Plant Change Request will be installed which provides an improved signal smoothing algorithm.
POIVER                            20405(e) (I) (0                            SOM(c)III                        50.734) (2)(rl                                      73.71(c)
NRC Form 388 This event is being reported in accordance with 10CPR50.73(a)(2)(iv) as an automatic actuation of an Engineered Safety Feature.8801220203 880114 PDR ADOCK 05000400 8 DCD R
LEVEL 0                    20.405(el(1)(8)                             SOM(c)(2)                       50.73(el(2)(rS)                                       OTHER ISpecify In 48rtrect Vd '' V(                                                                                                                                              Oelorernd In Text, IIAC Form 20.405(e I (1)(5 I)                         50.73(el(2)(I)                   50.73(e) (2)(rllll(AI                                3884)
NRC form 355A (083(LICENSEE EVENT REPORT ILER)TEXT CONTINUATION UA.NUCLEAR REOULATORY COMMISSION APPROVEO OMS NO.3(50M104 EXPIRES: 8/31/88 PACILITY NAME (I I SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER, PLANT UNIT ONE COCKET NUMBER (2l LER NUMEER (4l YEAR@g 55OUENTIAL:ag NUM II RCVI5ION NUM55/I PACE (3l TEXT//l moro spece lr roEM(orE rrm RR/Oono///RC
                          ~s (       20405(e)(I)Or)                             50.73(s) (2) (8)                50.73(s I 12 I (rI II)(B) 20.405(e) ('I ) (r)                        50.73(s)(2) IIII)               50.73(e) (2) (el LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
%%drm BRAS/(IT(DESCRIPTION:
NAME                                                                                                                                                            TELEPHONE NUMBER R. SCHWABENBAUER                     -   REGULATORY COMPLIANCE TECHICIAN                                                               AREA CODE 91           9362 -2 669 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13) sc
0 5 0 0 0 400 067 0 0 2 OF 0 4 The plant was operating in Mode 1, Power Operation, at 99 percent reactor power on December 14, 1987.At 0340 hours a chemistry technician was preparing to pull a grab sample from the Containment Leak Detection Radiation Monitor, (EIIS:IK)REM-1LT-3502A-SA.
                                                                                ' ' '
This monitor provides an indication of reactor coolant (EIIS:AB)leakage and provides an automatic isolation of the normal containment purge system (EIIS:BD)upon receiving a high radiation alarm.The grab samples taken from this monitor are used to evaluate airborne radioactivity and oxygen levels in Containment (EIIS:NH)prior to personnel entry.The chemistry technician connected the sample apparatus to the monitor grab sample lines and proceeded to close the grab sample bypass valve, initiating the grab sample.As the sample started the technician noticed the water flow in the tritium bubbler was reversed so he isolated the grab sample and checked his sample apparatus.
                                                                                                                                                                                              'P 14ANUFAC.          EPOATABLE                                                                      MANUFAC.                          '
The technician did not make any changes and started the process again which resulted in the same condition to occur.He then checked his hookup again and this time discovered that the sample lines from the monitor to the sample apparatus were reversed.He then corrected this problem and once again began closing the bypass valve to initiate the grab sample.As the grab sample started the technician noticed a surge in the grab sample flow caused by water in the tubing (from the tritium sampler).This surge coincided with a high radiation alarm received in the Main Control Room (MCR)and at the monitor skid.At this time the technician called the MCR to inform them of the event and that his sampling was the probable cause.In accordance with plant design a containment ventilation (EIIS:JM)isolation signal was generated when the monitor went into alarm and all containment ventilation isolation.
CAUSE     SYSTEM     COMPONENT                                                                     CAUSE SYSTEM  COMPONENT                                        EPORTABLE TUR ER           TO NPRDS                                                                         TVRER             TO NPRDS r
valves closed as required.The monitor alarm was then cleared and operations personnel visually verified the monitor to be operating correctly and returned the containment ventilation system to its normal operating valve lineup.The grab sample was then completed at 0400 hours, analyzed, and found to be within acceptable limits.CAUSE: While there was personnel error in the initial connection of the sampling device it could not be proven that this alone was the cause of the event.Sample valve manipulations apparently caused a flow surge which apparently initiated a high activity signal spike and caused the monitor to alarm.This alarm, in turn, caused the required automatic actuation of the containment ventilation isolation system which responded per plant design.NRC POIIM 555*(083 I oU.S.QPO:1085 0824 d38/45d
2
                                                                                ....A...AM.                                                                                         K              I SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)                                                                                     MONTH      OAY      YEAR EXPECTED SUBMISSION PATE (I SI YES Ilfyrr, complrtr EXPECTED SII84IISSION 04TEI                                       NO ABSTRACT IUmlt to 1400 lpeerr,   I r., rpproxlmerrly flfrrrn rlnplerprcr ryperrrlrtrn Iinrrl (18)
ABSTRACT:
The plant was operating in Mode 1, Power                                                     Operation, at 99 percent reactor power on December 14, 1987.                                         At 0340 hours           while a chemistry technician was obtaining a grab sample from Containment Leak Detection Radiation Monitor, REM-1LT-3502A-SA, a high radiation alarm was generated.                                                                         The high radiation alarm generated a containment ventilation isolat:on signal which resulted in the closure of all containment ventilation valves in accordance with plant design.
The cause             of the alarm                 was a         spurious electronic signal spike.
The alarm was                   cleared, the monitor was verified to be operating correctly, and the containment ventilation normal valve line-up was restored.                                                                                         The grab sample taken when the monitor alarmed was analy ed and found to be within acceptable limits.
Actions to prevent recurrence are.
labeled to ensure correct hook-up, sampling frequencies have been reduced, and
                                                                                                'grab      sample lines have been clearly a Plant Change Request will be installed which provides an improved signal smoothing algorithm.
This event is being reported in accordance with 10CPR50.73(a)(2)(iv)                                                                                           as     an automatic actuation of an Engineered Safety Feature.
8801220203 880114 PDR         ADOCK 05000400 8                                       DCD NRC Form 388


NRC form 344A (SS3)LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION UA.NUCLEAR REOULATORY COMMISSION APPROVEO OMS NO.3(9)WIOO EKPIRESI 4/31/SS SACILITY NAME (1)SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT ONE TEXT/Jf/Sere Santo)I IOUM)OS INO//I/oao/kRC Form 3SSA3)OT)CAUSE: (continued)
R NRC  form 355A                                                                                                UA. NUCLEAR REOULATORY COMMISSION (083(
OOCKET NUMSER (2)o s o o o 4 0 YEAR 8 7-0 6 7 LER NUMSER (4)Sf OUCNIIAL NVMOER REVISION NVM ta fAOE (3)OF 0 0 3 0 4 However, a spurious, high activity alarm and consequent ventilation isolation were experienced during a routine sampling evolution at 0408 on December 16, 1987.The coincidence of the alarms with the sampling cannot be explained at this time.ANALYSIS: This event is being reported in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv) as an automatic actuation of a plant Engineered Safety Feature (ESF).No safety consequences resulted from this event.The grab sample results, taken during the event, indicate there was no increase in containment airborne activity during the time the monitor was in alarm.It is'eportable because the possible automatic actuation of ESF was not anticipated due to personnel error in failing to notify the MCR prior to sampling.This monitor has a history of susceptibility to otherwise innocuous disturbances resulting in spurious alarms.Had the alarm been caused by excessive Reactor Coolant System (RCS)leakage, it would have been contained in the containment building, as required, by the actuation of the containment ventilation isolation system which responded per design.There have not been any similar events reported.CORRECTIVE ACTIONS/ACTIONS TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT ILER) TEXT CONTINUATION                                APPROVEO OMS NO. 3(50M104 EXPIRES: 8/31/88 PACILITY NAME (I I                                                      COCKET NUMBER (2l                                              PACE (3l LER NUMEER (4l SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER, PLANT                                                          YEAR    55OUENTIAL:ag  RCVI5ION
1.A Plant Change R(dquest (PCR)will be installed which provides an improved signal smoothing algorithm to reduce the monitors susceptibility to spurious alarms.2.Sampling frequencies on monitor REM"1LT-3502A-SA have been reduced to once a week or as required.3.Radiation monitor grab sample lines have been clearly labeled to ensure correct hookup.4.Alternative methods are being investigated for grab sampling locations/methods.
                                                                                                      @g    NUM  II      NUM55/I UNIT      ONE TEXT //lmoro spece lr roEM(orE rrm RR/Oono///RC %%drm BRAS/ (IT(
NRC SORM 3OOA (943)a U.S OPO:104dd)d)24 438/ddd e
0  5  0  0  0  400            067            0 0          2 OF 0      4 DESCRIPTION:
NRC form 888A (!HLI)LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)TEXT CONTINUATION US.NUCLEAR RECULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED OMS NO.3(EOMI(>>EXPIRES: 8/2(/88 PACILITY NAME (Il SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT ONE TEXT//f more g>>ce/r//r/rerE r>>o//rior>>////IC Arm Sr)I/AEI (IT)DOCKET NUMBER (2)YEAR o s o o o 400 87 LER NUMBER (8)SEQUENTIAL NUMIIER 067 REVI5ION NUM eR PACE (8)oF 04 000 4 CORRECTIVE'CTIONS/ACTIONS TO PREVENT RECURRENCE (continued) 5.The leak detection monitor will be declared inoperable and appropriate Technical Specification actions taken when sampling is done rom its flow path.NIIC PO/IM 840*(843)<<U.S.OPO:18804424.538/455 CSEE>>Carolina Power&Light Company HARRIS NUCLEAR PROJECT P.O.Box 165 New Hill, NC 27562 JAN 14 1988 File Number.'HF/10-13510C Letter Number'.HO-880003 (0)U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: NRC Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 1 DOCKET NO.50-400 LICENSE NO.NPF-63 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT 87-067-00 Gentl.emen.'n accordance with Title 10 to the Code of Federal Regulations, the enclosed Licensee Event Report is submitted.
The plant was operating in Mode 1, Power Operation, at 99 percent reactor power on December 14, 1987.                                  At 0340 hours a chemistry technician was preparing to pull a grab sample from the Containment Leak Detection Radiation Monitor, (EIIS:IK) REM-1LT-3502A-SA. This monitor provides an indication of reactor coolant (EIIS:AB) leakage and provides an automatic isolation of the normal containment purge system (EIIS:BD) upon receiving a high radiation alarm. The grab samples taken from this monitor are used to evaluate airborne radioactivity and oxygen levels in Containment (EIIS:NH) prior to personnel entry.
This report fulfills the requirement for a written report within thirty (30)days of a reportable occurrence and is in accordance with the format set forth in NUREG-1022, September, 1983.Very truly yours,/Zoic'J~~R.A.Watson Vice President Harris Nuclear Project RAW:acm Enclosure cc'.Dr.J.Nelson Grace (NRC-RII)Mr.B.Buckley (NRR)Mr.G.Maxwell (NRC-SHNPP)MEM/LER-87"067/1/OS1}}
The chemistry technician connected the sample apparatus to the monitor grab sample lines and proceeded to close the grab sample bypass valve, initiating the grab sample. As the sample started the technician noticed the water flow in the tritium bubbler was reversed so he isolated the grab sample and checked his sample apparatus. The technician did not make any changes and started the process again which resulted                            in the same condition to occur. He then checked his      hookup          again and this time discovered that the sample lines from the monitor to the sample apparatus were reversed. He then corrected this problem and once again began closing the bypass valve to initiate the grab sample.                                                  As the grab sample started the technician noticed a surge in the grab sample flow caused by water in the tubing (from the tritium sampler).
This surge coincided with a high radiation alarm received in the Main Control Room (MCR) and at the monitor skid.                                    At this time the technician called the MCR to inform them of the event                                    and that his sampling was the probable cause.              In accordance with plant design a containment ventilation (EIIS:JM) isolation signal was generated when the monitor went into alarm and all containment ventilation isolation. valves closed as required.
The monitor alarm was then                            cleared    and operations personnel visually verified the monitor to be operating                            correctly    and returned the containment ventilation system to              its    normal operating valve lineup.
The grab sample                      was      then completed at 0400 hours,          analyzed,      and found            to  be within acceptable limits.
CAUSE:
While there was personnel error in the initial connection of the sampling device          it      could not be proven that this alone was the cause of the event.
Sample valve manipulations apparently caused a flow surge which apparently initiated a high activity signal spike and caused the monitor to alarm. This alarm, in turn, caused the required automatic actuation of the containment ventilation isolation system which responded per plant design.
NRC POIIM 555*
(083 I                                                                                                                    oU.S.QPO:1085 0824 d38/45d
 
NRC form 344A                                                                                                   UA. NUCLEAR REOULATORY COMMISSION (SS3)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION                                 APPROVEO OMS NO. 3(9)WIOO EKPIRESI 4/31/SS SACILITY NAME (1)                                                       OOCKET NUMSER (2)              LER NUMSER (4)                    fAOE (3)
YEAR  Sf OUCNIIAL    REVISION SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT                                                                       NVMOER        NVM  ta UNIT ONE o  s  o  o  o  4 0    8  70      6 7              0 0    3 OF      0 4 TEXT /Jf /Sere Santo )I IOUM)OS INO //I/oao/kRC Form 3SSA3) OT)
CAUSE:           (continued)
However, a spurious, high activity alarm and consequent ventilation isolation were           experienced               during a routine sampling evolution at 0408 on December 16, 1987.                       The coincidence of the alarms with the sampling cannot be explained at this time.
ANALYSIS:
This event is being reported in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv)                                                   as   an automatic actuation of a plant Engineered Safety Feature (ESF).
No     safety consequences resulted from this event. The grab sample results, taken during the event, indicate there was no increase in containment airborne activity during the time the monitor was in alarm.
It is 'eportable because the possible automatic actuation of ESF was not anticipated due to personnel error in failing to notify the MCR prior to sampling.
This monitor has a history of susceptibility                                           to otherwise           innocuous disturbances resulting in spurious alarms.
Had       the alarm been caused by excessive Reactor Coolant System (RCS) leakage, it would             have been contained in the containment building, as required, by the actuation of the containment ventilation isolation system which responded per design.
There have not been any                           similar events reported.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS/ACTIONS TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:
: 1.         A Plant Change R(dquest (PCR) will be installed which provides an improved signal smoothing algorithm to reduce the monitors susceptibility to spurious alarms.
: 2.         Sampling           frequencies on monitor REM"1LT-3502A-SA have been reduced                                   to once a week           or as required.
: 3.         Radiation monitor grab sample lines have been clearly labeled to ensure correct hookup.
: 4.         Alternative               methods       are   being       investigated   for     grab         sampling locations/methods.
NRC SORM 3OOA                                                                                                               a U.S OPO:104dd)d)24 438/ddd (943)
 
e NRC form 888A                                                                                           US. NUCLEAR RECULATORY COMMISSION
(!HLI)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION                           APPROVED OMS NO. 3(EOMI(>>
EXPIRES: 8/2(/88 PACILITY NAME (Il                                                 DOCKET NUMBER (2)            LER NUMBER (8)                  PACE (8)
YEAR  SEQUENTIAL      REVI5ION SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT                                                               NUMIIER        NUM eR UNIT ONE o  s  o  o  o  400 87        067            000        4 oF      04 TEXT //f more g>>ce /r //r/rerE r>>o //rior>>////IC Arm Sr)I/AEI (IT)
CORRECTIVE'CTIONS/ACTIONS TO PREVENT RECURRENCE                               (continued)
: 5.         The       leak detection monitor will be declared inoperable and appropriate Technical Specification actions taken when sampling is done rom its flow path.
NIIC PO/IM 840*                                                                                                     <<U.S.OPO:18804424.538/455 (843)
 
CSEE>>
Carolina Power & Light Company HARRIS NUCLEAR PROJECT P.O. Box 165 New   Hill, NC   27562 JAN 14   1988 File Number.'HF/10-13510C Letter Number'. HO-880003 (0)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN:             NRC Document Control Desk Washington,             DC   20555 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT       UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-400 LICENSE NO. NPF-63 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT 87-067-00 Gentl.emen.'n accordance with Title 10 to the Code of Federal Regulations, the enclosed Licensee Event Report is submitted.                         This report fulfills the requirement for a written report within thirty (30) days of a reportable occurrence and is in accordance with the format set forth in NUREG-1022, September, 1983.
Very truly yours,
                                              /Zoic'J~~
R. A. Watson Vice President Harris Nuclear Project RAW:acm Enclosure cc'.           Dr. J. Nelson Grace     (NRC - RII)
Mr. B. Buckley (NRR)
Mr. G. Maxwell (NRC SHNPP)
MEM/LER-87"067/1/OS1}}

Revision as of 05:59, 22 October 2019

LER 87-067-00:on 871214,containment Ventilation Isolation Occurred Due to High Radiation Alarm While Grab Sampling at Monitor REM-1LT-3502A-SA.Caused by Personnel Error & Eletronic Signal Spike.Sample Line labeled.W/880114 Ltr
ML18005A249
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/14/1988
From: Schwabenbauer, Watson R
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
References
HO-880003-(O), LER-87-067, LER-87-67, NUDOCS 8801220203
Download: ML18005A249 (10)


Text

- 1 ACCELHRATZD M BUTION MMONSTRA7ION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATXON DXSTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:8801220203 DOC.DATE: 88/01/14 NOTARIZED- NO DQCKET FACIL:50-400 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Carolina 05000400 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION SCHWABENBAUER Carolina Power & Light; Co.

WATSON,R.A. Carolina Power 6 Light Co.

RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

SUBJECT:

LER 87-067-00:on 871214,containment ventilation isolation

-due to spurious high radiation alarm while sampling.

W/8 ltr.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR L ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: 50.73 Licensee Event Report, (LER), Incident Rpt, et:c. 9 NOTES:Application for permit renewal filed. 0500040 RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPXES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD2-1 LA 1 1 PD2-1 PD 1 1 A BUCKLEY,B 1 1 INTERNAL: ACRS MICHELSON 1 1 ACRS MOELLER 2 2 AEOD/DOA 1 1 AEOD/DS P/NAS 1 1 AEOD/DSP/ROAB 2 2 AEOD/DSP/TPAB 1 1 ARM/DCTS/DAB 1 -

1 DEDRO 1 1 NRR/DEST/ADS 1 0 NRR/DEST/CEB 1 1 NRR/DEST/ELB 1 1 NRR/DEST/ICSB 1 1 NRR/DES T/MEB 1 1 NRR/DE ST/MTB 1 1 NRR/DEST/PSB 1 1 NRR/DEST/RSB 1 1 NRR/DEST/SGB 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/HFB 1 1 NRR/DLPQ/QAB 1 1 NRR/DOEA/EAB 1 1 NRR/DREP/RAB 1 1 NRR/DREP/RPB 2 2 RZ SIB 1 1 NRR/PMAS/ILRB 1 1 G F 02 1 1 RES TELFORD,J 1 1 RES/DE/EIB 1 1 RES/DRPS DIR 1 1 RGN2 FILE 01 1 1 EXTERNAL EGGG GROH i M 5 5 FORD BLDG HOY,A 1 1 H ST LOBBY WARD 1 1 LPDR '1 1 i R NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC HARRIS,J 1 1 NSIC MAYS,G 1 1 S

A TOTAL NUMBER 0$ COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 46 ENCL 45

NRC Form 388 US. NUCLEAR AEOULATOAYCOMMISSION (949 l APPROVEO OMB NO. 31500)04 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) EXPIRES: 8/31/88 FACILITY NAME (I) DOCKET NUMBER (2) PA 5 3 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT ONE o s o o o 40 0>'OF04 CONTAINMENT VENTILATION ISOLATION DUE TO A SPURIOUS HIGH RADIATION ALAMO WHILE SAMPLING AT MONITOR EVENT DATE (5) LER NUMBER (8) REPORT DATE (7) OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED ISI

' SEaUSNTrAL MONTH OAY YEAR YEAR g4 NUMSSA (I(. SA MONTH DAY YEAR FACILITYNAMES DOCKET NUMBERIS) 0 5 0 0 0 1 2148 78 7 0 6 7 00 011 488 THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PUASVANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR ('ll fChrcfr onr or more 0'50oo OPERATINO of tire follorflnPI (11)

MODE (9)

] 20.402(b) 20405(cl 50.7 3(s I (2)(lel 73.71(8)

POIVER 20405(e) (I) (0 SOM(c)III 50.734) (2)(rl 73.71(c)

LEVEL 0 20.405(el(1)(8) SOM(c)(2) 50.73(el(2)(rS) OTHER ISpecify In 48rtrect Vd V( Oelorernd In Text, IIAC Form 20.405(e I (1)(5 I) 50.73(el(2)(I) 50.73(e) (2)(rllll(AI 3884)

~s ( 20405(e)(I)Or) 50.73(s) (2) (8) 50.73(s I 12 I (rI II)(B) 20.405(e) ('I ) (r) 50.73(s)(2) IIII) 50.73(e) (2) (el LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)

NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER R. SCHWABENBAUER - REGULATORY COMPLIANCE TECHICIAN AREA CODE 91 9362 -2 669 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13) sc

' ' '

'P 14ANUFAC. EPOATABLE MANUFAC. '

CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT EPORTABLE TUR ER TO NPRDS TVRER TO NPRDS r

2

....A...AM. K I SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14) MONTH OAY YEAR EXPECTED SUBMISSION PATE (I SI YES Ilfyrr, complrtr EXPECTED SII84IISSION 04TEI NO ABSTRACT IUmlt to 1400 lpeerr, I r., rpproxlmerrly flfrrrn rlnplerprcr ryperrrlrtrn Iinrrl (18)

ABSTRACT:

The plant was operating in Mode 1, Power Operation, at 99 percent reactor power on December 14, 1987. At 0340 hours0.00394 days <br />0.0944 hours <br />5.621693e-4 weeks <br />1.2937e-4 months <br /> while a chemistry technician was obtaining a grab sample from Containment Leak Detection Radiation Monitor, REM-1LT-3502A-SA, a high radiation alarm was generated. The high radiation alarm generated a containment ventilation isolat:on signal which resulted in the closure of all containment ventilation valves in accordance with plant design.

The cause of the alarm was a spurious electronic signal spike.

The alarm was cleared, the monitor was verified to be operating correctly, and the containment ventilation normal valve line-up was restored. The grab sample taken when the monitor alarmed was analy ed and found to be within acceptable limits.

Actions to prevent recurrence are.

labeled to ensure correct hook-up, sampling frequencies have been reduced, and

'grab sample lines have been clearly a Plant Change Request will be installed which provides an improved signal smoothing algorithm.

This event is being reported in accordance with 10CPR50.73(a)(2)(iv) as an automatic actuation of an Engineered Safety Feature.

8801220203 880114 PDR ADOCK 05000400 8 DCD NRC Form 388

R NRC form 355A UA. NUCLEAR REOULATORY COMMISSION (083(

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT ILER) TEXT CONTINUATION APPROVEO OMS NO. 3(50M104 EXPIRES: 8/31/88 PACILITY NAME (I I COCKET NUMBER (2l PACE (3l LER NUMEER (4l SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER, PLANT YEAR 55OUENTIAL:ag RCVI5ION

@g NUM II NUM55/I UNIT ONE TEXT //lmoro spece lr roEM(orE rrm RR/Oono///RC %%drm BRAS/ (IT(

0 5 0 0 0 400 067 0 0 2 OF 0 4 DESCRIPTION:

The plant was operating in Mode 1, Power Operation, at 99 percent reactor power on December 14, 1987. At 0340 hours0.00394 days <br />0.0944 hours <br />5.621693e-4 weeks <br />1.2937e-4 months <br /> a chemistry technician was preparing to pull a grab sample from the Containment Leak Detection Radiation Monitor, (EIIS:IK) REM-1LT-3502A-SA. This monitor provides an indication of reactor coolant (EIIS:AB) leakage and provides an automatic isolation of the normal containment purge system (EIIS:BD) upon receiving a high radiation alarm. The grab samples taken from this monitor are used to evaluate airborne radioactivity and oxygen levels in Containment (EIIS:NH) prior to personnel entry.

The chemistry technician connected the sample apparatus to the monitor grab sample lines and proceeded to close the grab sample bypass valve, initiating the grab sample. As the sample started the technician noticed the water flow in the tritium bubbler was reversed so he isolated the grab sample and checked his sample apparatus. The technician did not make any changes and started the process again which resulted in the same condition to occur. He then checked his hookup again and this time discovered that the sample lines from the monitor to the sample apparatus were reversed. He then corrected this problem and once again began closing the bypass valve to initiate the grab sample. As the grab sample started the technician noticed a surge in the grab sample flow caused by water in the tubing (from the tritium sampler).

This surge coincided with a high radiation alarm received in the Main Control Room (MCR) and at the monitor skid. At this time the technician called the MCR to inform them of the event and that his sampling was the probable cause. In accordance with plant design a containment ventilation (EIIS:JM) isolation signal was generated when the monitor went into alarm and all containment ventilation isolation. valves closed as required.

The monitor alarm was then cleared and operations personnel visually verified the monitor to be operating correctly and returned the containment ventilation system to its normal operating valve lineup.

The grab sample was then completed at 0400 hours0.00463 days <br />0.111 hours <br />6.613757e-4 weeks <br />1.522e-4 months <br />, analyzed, and found to be within acceptable limits.

CAUSE:

While there was personnel error in the initial connection of the sampling device it could not be proven that this alone was the cause of the event.

Sample valve manipulations apparently caused a flow surge which apparently initiated a high activity signal spike and caused the monitor to alarm. This alarm, in turn, caused the required automatic actuation of the containment ventilation isolation system which responded per plant design.

NRC POIIM 555*

(083 I oU.S.QPO:1085 0824 d38/45d

NRC form 344A UA. NUCLEAR REOULATORY COMMISSION (SS3)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION APPROVEO OMS NO. 3(9)WIOO EKPIRESI 4/31/SS SACILITY NAME (1) OOCKET NUMSER (2) LER NUMSER (4) fAOE (3)

YEAR Sf OUCNIIAL REVISION SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT NVMOER NVM ta UNIT ONE o s o o o 4 0 8 70 6 7 0 0 3 OF 0 4 TEXT /Jf /Sere Santo )I IOUM)OS INO //I/oao/kRC Form 3SSA3) OT)

CAUSE: (continued)

However, a spurious, high activity alarm and consequent ventilation isolation were experienced during a routine sampling evolution at 0408 on December 16, 1987. The coincidence of the alarms with the sampling cannot be explained at this time.

ANALYSIS:

This event is being reported in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv) as an automatic actuation of a plant Engineered Safety Feature (ESF).

No safety consequences resulted from this event. The grab sample results, taken during the event, indicate there was no increase in containment airborne activity during the time the monitor was in alarm.

It is 'eportable because the possible automatic actuation of ESF was not anticipated due to personnel error in failing to notify the MCR prior to sampling.

This monitor has a history of susceptibility to otherwise innocuous disturbances resulting in spurious alarms.

Had the alarm been caused by excessive Reactor Coolant System (RCS) leakage, it would have been contained in the containment building, as required, by the actuation of the containment ventilation isolation system which responded per design.

There have not been any similar events reported.

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS/ACTIONS TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:

1. A Plant Change R(dquest (PCR) will be installed which provides an improved signal smoothing algorithm to reduce the monitors susceptibility to spurious alarms.
2. Sampling frequencies on monitor REM"1LT-3502A-SA have been reduced to once a week or as required.
3. Radiation monitor grab sample lines have been clearly labeled to ensure correct hookup.
4. Alternative methods are being investigated for grab sampling locations/methods.

NRC SORM 3OOA a U.S OPO:104dd)d)24 438/ddd (943)

e NRC form 888A US. NUCLEAR RECULATORY COMMISSION

(!HLI)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION APPROVED OMS NO. 3(EOMI(>>

EXPIRES: 8/2(/88 PACILITY NAME (Il DOCKET NUMBER (2) LER NUMBER (8) PACE (8)

YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVI5ION SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT NUMIIER NUM eR UNIT ONE o s o o o 400 87 067 000 4 oF 04 TEXT //f more g>>ce /r //r/rerE r>>o //rior>>////IC Arm Sr)I/AEI (IT)

CORRECTIVE'CTIONS/ACTIONS TO PREVENT RECURRENCE (continued)

5. The leak detection monitor will be declared inoperable and appropriate Technical Specification actions taken when sampling is done rom its flow path.

NIIC PO/IM 840* <<U.S.OPO:18804424.538/455 (843)

CSEE>>

Carolina Power & Light Company HARRIS NUCLEAR PROJECT P.O. Box 165 New Hill, NC 27562 JAN 14 1988 File Number.'HF/10-13510C Letter Number'. HO-880003 (0)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: NRC Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-400 LICENSE NO. NPF-63 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT 87-067-00 Gentl.emen.'n accordance with Title 10 to the Code of Federal Regulations, the enclosed Licensee Event Report is submitted. This report fulfills the requirement for a written report within thirty (30) days of a reportable occurrence and is in accordance with the format set forth in NUREG-1022, September, 1983.

Very truly yours,

/Zoic'J~~

R. A. Watson Vice President Harris Nuclear Project RAW:acm Enclosure cc'. Dr. J. Nelson Grace (NRC - RII)

Mr. B. Buckley (NRR)

Mr. G. Maxwell (NRC SHNPP)

MEM/LER-87"067/1/OS1