ML20197G673
| ML20197G673 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 05/13/1986 |
| From: | Barat S SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE |
| To: | Bradford L THREE MILE ISLAND ALERT |
| References | |
| CON-#286-170 CH, NUDOCS 8605160357 | |
| Download: ML20197G673 (16) | |
Text
_-
j d
evu w canurvene t SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTs & TROWBRIDGE a
A pamTNERSMep aNCLuD'NG pmOFESSIONAL CompORAftONS 1800 M STRE ET. N. W.
WA$MINGTON. D. C. 20036 (202)8221000 maMSaw o. pOTTS. p C.
STEVEN M LuCA S.
- C.
TMOMa5 C. MILL E. Sut SemaGuE L. ovaNE CMEEm oOaNE r. msECMEL m ETEvamT L. p,TTMaN. p C DAvio M musENSTEeN. p C Marsas r. Tmav MiCMaEL m MacoEN emuCE e McELvEiN*
vsCTomaa J. PE m'E SO-Diaz, o C.
ETEp*eEN o pOTTS. P C.
min S.
- C TELECOpiEm matpH A. Tavtom. Ja ataN o waSSERMAN c Emato CManNorr. p C.
ALLEse J. mLE th wetsEm? waSMeNGTON is JOM N N O NE'LL Jm (202}S22-1099 6.822s199 Jat A. EPSTIEN. p C.
p C-PMsu* o. eOSTwicm. P C.
MANNAM E. M uteEmMaN DOROYMEa w. OsCKERMaN
- m. TtMOTMy *.aesLON. p C.
a lN
- JuD8TM a SaNDLE R JONaTM AN T. C.LLE ROE GEOmGE M NOGEmS.Jm.p.C.
JEFFE nv L vasLON.
- C.
FAED a LITTLE* P C JACm McmAv.
- C
- TM'CManO A. SaMp m
DOUGLAS L M maplFaz 600 OMAS E. CmOCmEn. Jse meCManD e AN$naCHER JOMN el mMsNELaNOER, p C.
Hammv M. GL ASSP'EGEL Tm?Ma.M" ban..
@ aks M 0oTA T7,0,Mfy,Mg.m"'Cm se2 eO72 meCE w C*uRCMmuo C.
a LEkL'E a NICMOLSON. Jm., c mgNNETH m MLLE n EVANS MUSER MARTIN O amaLL PC pe ut r M,sC,m,Ev.,Je-
- $25*dsMa*'A* _
,/
q
- /
JOMNM.MOmE JUDY wEsSaumG*e 5
QI '
paub S **LE Cm i ETMaN J FmiE DMaN
/
NCSEnv M GORDON Em JAv E. SmBERG. P C.
E'">"m'a"E v"a"*E ' J.'TE*
Egv = EAEm t
"4"e'Oh?.*f"iE.i ?E
"'N"E vT *Ju'TC"MiNC S.
E M,, E,,a,Ma,,M,E,.,S, to,y o.',ganLE'SMawtAw StaNtEv M mamG most ANN SuLuvaN
- m. mENLv wEeSTEn. p C.
s LESu SwiTM e4Reana e MAN *i*s4N NaTMaNsEL e emE Eo. Ja. a c.
uow y'
c TRavta s E,.,a,g,.,,,, o,a, a,,,y t,a y. a,
c
,,L o
S T. enO*N. Jn JOSEp e E. mE.NDau MammauGENeuCa.*C.
mO=E RT M o Giova*eNe e STrpMEN e MEiM ANN EmMEST c eLamt. Jm. p C.
m s'
vino,N,, o,,,CE AMELa M ANDERSON A*eNE Mamet pt CMT CAmLETO's S JONE S. p C.
TMCMas a BastvEm p C.
","a[O M
=
e508 FanM CmEDet gd uaNDER E TOMASZCM JOMN N NaS$enAS HP SM EmMAN EFFREY J A. Geses diane 5. SMapano SMELDON J. WEtSEL p C BORAM e. SauSE m
,4
, MCLEaN. VIRGg 2'02 Au ENCE W CO*e E N C#iSTEENA G. NASEnt m
J. PaTmeCm MsCmEv. P C.
J TMO**a S LE NMa mT.
- C.
ha PC3 9 ?SO g E R,E,", *g hD,E,"Cm TMOM A S,,*
a m NF EE M
STEVE N L. ME L Z E R.
- C.
go,% u JO*e ps E NG E L p C.,C ggomog r aggmsowy, gm.*,,.
/*
=i, FFREY m SNvDEm*
SUSAN C. LONGP. MEET **
envSou DEAN D. AubfCa. p ELEcopiEn anvL ANNE LANDER MiCMAEL C. **OETE LL JaCmm.MonN Mium D.Po.mTER JOMN J M AN DL E R**
C. TMOMas MaCMS m. p C..
SETM *e MOOGASlaN
(
g LtEN SMEm FF SCOTT E. samaT POKeepe(
- C a t mT E. COM N SMEsL A McC HamvEY ANeTa J. FseemELSTEIN LE SUE C. ZIMSERG**
CMamLES e TEMm*N.
- C-DEUSSA a. N'DG*av
'-* ji
[ [DaveD m SaMe J ANET C. MECu*
mENonA A. GALL AGME n.MT**
STE pMEN e MUTTLE R, p C.
MENNETMJ MayTMaN
_e C SowOO4N TaalN diane MONTLLOR wmeG w NTMNOp N seO*N. p C.
oaveD LawmENCE M4LEm*
FRED DmaSNEm
' JE rFREv w. maMpELMAN
'p JaME S e MaMu's. P C.
FmEDE meCm L KLEiN
/
RENNETH a. GALLO DomOTMv a. SCMLOTM*
GwaNDALe mELL eC.
STEVEN p psTL E m t.Jo**M.F1DE, ALT DaygO m LEW'S NANCY C. WAGNEm
,NQ4 e A. pavnsCm LEeGMTON HI ME'CMARD C. DONaLDSON*
n R. SCOTT CUSTEn. Ja m'CManD J name.NO CM -
mEviN FLYNN CSet L MQQRES LLv M. CAmME S*
nose RT E. 2aseLE n. P C.
ELLE N A. FRE DEL JEFFIDEY G. BEmMaN nosERT e monesNS.
- C.
ManiE N. DOL AND*
NF GEORGE F, TmOWSmeOGE e 8sOf aceeME O e O C.
COUNSEL
- aoMeno see vememia May 13, 1986 wn tem S o.mECT o.AL NuMBEm (202) 955-3268 l
BY FEDERAL EXPRESS Ms. Louise Bradford Three Mile Island Alert 1011 Green Street Harrisburg, PA 17102 Re:
In the Matter of General Public Utilities Nuclear Corporation (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit No. 1), Docket No. 50-289 (CH)
Dear Louise:
Today we located additional documents responsive to Re-quest No. 1 of "TMIA's First Request for Production of Docu-ments and First Interrogatories to General Public Utilities Nuclear."
Accordingly, enclosed please find:
(1)
Metropolitan Edison Company Employee Appraisal Report of Charles E. Husted for the period from 2/26/74 to 3/27/74; (2)
Metropolitan Edison Company Employee Appraisal Report of Charles E. Husted for the period from 3/28/74 to 4/27/74; (3)
Metropolitan Edison Company Employee Appraisal Report of Charles E. Husted for the period from 4/28/74 to 5/17/74; 8605160357 860513 gDR g
3 ADOCK 0500 9
l
e
,s SH Aw, PITTM AN, PoTTs & TROWBRIDGE A PARTNERS *P INCLuOspeG PROFESS *0NAL CORPORATCNS Ms. Louise Bradford Page two May 13, 1986 (4)
Metropolitan Edison Company Employee Appraisal Report of Charles E. Husted for the period from 8/15/77 to 9/13/77; (5)
Metropolitan Edison Company Employee Appraisal Report of Charles E. Husted for the period from 9/14/77 to 10/13/77; and (6)
Metropolitan Edison Company Employee Appraisal Report of Charles E. Husted for the period from 10/14/77 to 11/12/77.
Sincerely, Scott E.
Barat Enclosures cc:
Service List (attached w/encls.)
1 v
~
c.-
v
Mishm METRSPOLITAN EDISEN CSMPANY EMPt,0YEE APPRAISAL REPORT 6149 2-26-74 To 3-27-74 Probatiom (;
Name Charles E. Husted Er4ployee No.
__ rrom (1070) Aux Opr="A"-Nuclear (P) k l
2-26-74 Classincation S*niority Date Annual
(
Permanent 5)
Temporary ()
Periodie
(
SAFETY Careless, works Needs reminding of Exerciou normal care Alert to safety !
unsolely. Poor safety rules. Has had regarding safety les.
hazards. Escelle accident record.
some accidents.
Good y
ed.
safety record.
Comments:
JUDGEMENT Poor judgement.
Han difficulty Generally uses Es)gement anc tionally go Quite often makes reasoning thlags good judgement.
J Ability to asene facts and make serious errors.
through.
common sense decisions.
1 Comments:
RELIABILITY Con reely be Can only be Generally can be Can be depende Abtlity to perform consistentl PenM upom
& n to gain confidence of others.y and g
un ce o l
oburvation.
Comments:
i e
LEADERSHIP No ability j
Little ability Satisfactory.
Shonsgood demonstrated.
demonstrated.
as respect of leaderahlp Ability to direct work of others.
I p
fellow employees.
qualitiee.
Comments:
INOWLEDGE OF JQB Shows lack of Tob knowledge o r.all knowledge Outstanding Basic understanding of the essen.
knowledge on lacking in certain of e.e job.
knowled
% ge of a
' ""#Y I areas.
tial elemen:s that constitute the prese l
theory and practice of the job.
Comments:
QUANTITY OF WORE Unsatisfactory.
Slow worker.
Meets job Above average M[
Amount of work produced in the
- * *^
required time.
Comments:
QUALITY OF WORE Unocceptable.
Work needs Meets job rquire.
Work above Accur
. thoroughness and checking but ents with little standard. Neat depend ility of results.
generall tabb.
W checidng.
and careful.
Comments:
SELF IMPROVEMENT No interest in Has evidenced Has engaged in self Exceptional in Voluntary activity to improve additional education interest in self improvement and improveman l
employees potential for or self help.
improvement Comments:
outside activity, p and outside advancement.
,c,i,3,y, gegg, gig,,,
mee se u
-ee6uev
- N N
E PUBUC CONTACTS Poor customer Fair custo ylg Handles customers Excellent cuhtome:
wett relations.
1 relanons.
tions. Sh*I D=atmgs with customern-with e I 3 F*
LIIT gjl'I Comments:
SELF REUANCE-INITIATIVE Must be told what to Usually goes chead.
Needs little or no Seeks what is to do. Needs constant Needs urging to get
'ng. Does what he be done and Ability displayed in taking inde.
pushing.
things done.
is supposed to do.
does it.
pendent action within the limits of Y
the job.
t'n==ents :
ABILITY TO LEARN Has trouble learning, Slow to learn.
fairly easily:
Quick to learn.
Poor retention.
Retains information.
retains well.
Good retention.
Ability to grasp new ideas and concepts.
h Comments:
APPLICATION Very poor. Uses little Applies himself.
an acceptchle Applies himself
"" 'II ' ' "
" d* * ** "#9 9'
'no urging. "
- II' lab Use of previous! acquired knowl.
Problems.
avai edge to perform duties most effee.
tively.
Comments:
COOPERATIVENESS Resists new methods.
Oceastono!!y has Usually very Gets.along Irntates people al.
problems getting tive. Good extremel well wit ho most constantly.
along with others.
werker.
othe m llent to p odu a:
1 ly work force.
Comments:
OBSERVANCE OF RULES AND Must be constantly Minor infrections.
- Observes, prves all rule reminded of rules and j
and regulations REGULATIONS regulations. Numerous y
and reminds other to do the amne.
_or serious infractions.
Comments:
Wh M A -
- U5IVEg PERSONAL APPEARANCE Exceptional ( )
Appropriate Careless
() I??. Agg ATTENT ANCE/PUNCTUAUTY Excellent
()
Satisfactory Erratic
()M 3 197d supervisors Comm.nts
' " " ~ ~ -
- r. p gp.y MET - ED CD.
_ S-so<s Si,no,.e _v, cA&
Employee's Comments..-
9
.__. M us6ek M b A m M* 4 ~ L LJ N & ed m a A m u ;i& L,1h i
5/ A ~4 4 m/ - d (2/(/M Em,ioy.e.s S1gn
,e:
5/als
-,e..
g METROP3UTAN EDISON COMPANY EMPLOYEE APPRAtsAL REPont Name Charles E. Husted Employee No. _3IN9 From 3-28-70 To 0-27-74__ Probadonasy (.'
(1070) Aux Opr "A"-Nuclear (Prob)
I &3 Final r tw9 cation Seniority Date 2-26-74 Annual
(
Permanent (x)
Temporary ( )
Periodic
(
1 SAFETY Careless. works Needs reminding of Exercises normal cure Alert to safety -
unse!ely. Poor safety rules. Has had og safety rules.
hazards. Excene accident record.
some accidents.
safety recor safety record.
Comments:
JUDGEMENT Poor judgement.
Has difficulty Gumuseliy uses Exce onaHy goc Quite often makes reasoning things good judgement.
j gement and Ability to assess facts and make sedous omrs, through.
gl ma m.
decisions.
Comments:
RELIABILITY Can rcrsly be Ccn only be can be Can be depende
'P*n uM 4*n uPon
& pend n.
uponto M lac Ability to perform consistently and w a under
, *Wod mann to gain confidence of others obsarvation.
Comments:
i LEADERSHIP _
No chility i
Little ability Satisfactory.
Shows good demonstrated.
clemonstrated.
Has respect of leadership Ability to direct work of others.
follow emple qualities.
Comments:
I ENOWLEDGE OF IQB Shows lack of
+
Iob knowledge Over<ill knowledge Outstanding !
Basic understanding of the essen.
knowledge on j
lacking in certain of the job.j knowledge of al tial el.m.nis that constitute th.
" * "'Y * -
h j
P mes preeen r
theory and practice of the job.
Comments QUANTITY OF WORK Unsatisfactory.
Slow worker.
Meets job Above avemge Amount of work produced in the r"drernent8-Prod required time.
Comments:
QUALITY OF WORK Unacceptable.
Work needs Meets job r uire.
Work above g,gg,omy a
"j"g"'
- 2e*A."
a.d.J."i.
Comments:
SELF IMPROVEMENT No interest in Hes evidenced Has engaged in self Esceptional in Y'I""Y ' # 'Y I'"P'
additier al education interest in self improveme and self improvement ;
employees popanal for or self help.
improvement outside
'vity, and outside i odvancement.
activity.
activides.
Comments:
mee se,
m
. m n seer 3 M
m
l PUBLIC CONTACTS Poor customer Fair customer rela-Handles customers Excenent cu'stomer '
reasons.
bons.
- i"'"
Deaungs with customers-w th.
Comments:
)
SELF RELIANCE-INITIATIVE Must be told what to Usually goes chead.
Needehnlmeeno seeks what is to do. Needs constant Needs urging to get targmy. Does what he be done and Ability displayed in taking inde-pushing.
things doce.
is suppo to do.
does it.
pendent action within the limits of the job.
th= ants:
ABILITY TO LEARN Has trouble learning.
Slow to learn.
Learns fairly easily; Quick to loarn.
P or retention.
Retains information.
retains well.
Good retention.
Abihy 2 pp ww idus d conc
- Pts.
(hmants:
APPLICATION Very poor. Uses little Applies himself.
Does an acceptable Apphes himself or no effort to solve Needs some urging.
job.Need well. Uses Use of previously acquired know!-
problems.
no urging available edge to perform duties most effec.
tively.
Comssents:
COOPERATIVENESS Resists new methods.
Occasionally han UsueHy very Gets along Irntates people al-problems getting cooperative. Good extremel well wit!
others.hicellent m et c natantly.
along with others.
team worke to roduce a sm t ly pe ng team worker.
k im.
Comments:
OBSERVANCE OP RULES AND Must he constantly Minor infractions.
Observes.
Observes all rulee -
reminded of rules and and regulations RENTIONS regulations. Numerous and reminds othen or serious infractions.
to do the same.
Comments:
PERSONAL APPEARANCE Exceptional ( )
Appropriate C Careless
()
ATTENDANCE PUNCTUALITY Excellent
()
Satisfactory (
Erratic
()
/
Supervuor's Comments
__ Supervisor's Signature:
I*
'~
Employee's Comments c a
.3 ;.a Pf.3 k s.-.A. DEPL
[
-g g, Employee a Signature.
y Discussed with Employee em //- 20 W C
--M Mn I
S
l g
METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL REPORT Charles E. Husted to No. 6149 From +-28-7I' To 3-I7-74 Probationary (>
l (1070) Aux Opr "A"-Nuclear (Prob) 90th day 5-27-7f+
1 2 A Final Classification Seniority Date 2-26-786 Annual
(
Permanent (3 Temporary ()
Periodic
(
SAFETY Careless. works Needs renund:ng of
' Ezeretsee normal care Alert to safety unsafely. Poor safety rules. lies had regarding sciety rules.
hazards. Excelle:
accident record.
some accidents.
Good saf safety record.
Comments:
JUDGEMENT Poor judgement.
Has ddficulty M uses Enceptionany goc Ability to assess facts and make Quity of ten makes reasoning things good judgeme judgement and S* m u8
- m r8-drou9 common sense.
decisions.
Comments:
i RELIABILITY Can - : rely be l
Can enly be M can be Can be depende-depended upon. l
- 1er. ended upon depended up/
upon to work In e on.
Ability to perform consistently and when under exceptional mann to gain confidence of others.
I o h adon.
V Comments:
i LEADERSHIP No ability i
Lit:le ability Satisfactory.
Shows good demonstrated.
demonstrated.
Has respect of leadership Ability to direct work of others.
fellow em s.
qualities.
Comments:
KNOWLEDGE OF JOB Shows lack of Tob knowledge Overell knowledge Outstanding Bhaic understanding of the essen.
"#."
- 9* "
"Y'"**'""
I#
9' '
""'I N
N"***
tial elements that constitute the theory and practice of the job.
Comments:
QUANTITY OF WORK Unnatisfactory.
Slow worker.
i Meets job Above average Amount of work produced in the requirements.
production.
re,..d ume.
y Comments:
QUALITY OF WORK Unacceptable.
Work needs Meete job require.
Work above checking but ments with little standard. Neat
%#E*y J' 2" ""'
9'a;=n, re.
- i=9-yP**'='
Comments:
I SELF IMPROVEMENT No interest in Has evidenced Has engaged la self Exceptional in Vole'Y actiMtY b We additional education inicest in self improvement and self improvement employees potential for or soif help.
impronment outside aet-and outside i
advancement.
g g, ',,
,egggg, Comments:
]
mee se 1
.5.g
-.v -. - d. i.
E CO2
'XI PUBLIC CONTACTS Poor customer Fair customer rela.
Hcndles customers Excellent customer relations, tions. Should improve wel!.
relations" Declings with customers, with experience.
Comments:
SE!I RELIANCE-INTTIATIVE Must be told what to Usua!!y goes ahead.
Need m no Seeks what is to do. Needs cons: ant Needs urging to get urging. Does what he be done and Ability diaplayed in taking ind*
pendent act,on within the limits of pushing things done.
is supposed does it.
the job.
Comments:
ABIUTY To I. EARN Nas trouble learning.
Slow to learn.
I.earnspeasity:
Quick to learn.
Poor retention.
Retains information.
retaans well.
Good retennen.
Ability to grasp new ideas and concepk.
,f y
Comments:
APPLICATION Very poor. Uses litti.
Applies himself.
Does an aces table Applies hims.11 Use of previously acquired know!-
'"*N"'".
' ' ** "'Y "9 '
I ~
- U'lable U'**
edge to perform duties most effee.
Problems no urgin avai uveu.
~ s.
r Comments:
COOPERATIVENES8 Resists new methods.
Occasionally has Usually very Gets along Irritates people al-problems getting cooperative. Good extremel well with h
as most constantly.
along with others, team worker.
others.
llent ly ope g
work force.
Comments:
OBSERVANCE OF RUI.ES AND Must be constantly Minor infractions.
Observes.
Observes all rules REGULATIONS reminded of rules and and regulations requictions. Numerous
[n p ApJo4hes==_.
and reminds others
_or serious infractions.
I Commenis:
~ ~ n...', ', & a PERSONAL APPEARANCE Exceptional ( )
Appropriate ([
Careless
()
'I ATTENDANCE PUNCTUALITY Excellent
()
Satisfactory (
Erratic
/
PE!jSG';s.af. 3EPh <
Supervisor's Comments -
+
i
~
//
4 Superviser's Signature:
Ml Employee's Comments -
/,
g,.-
Employee's Signature:.
l Discussed with Employee on
/
-/
m
- r. -
- t. %..-f';,&,.?k..a. -e
~
mg METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL REPORT Name Charles E. Husted Employee No.
FroJ/15/77 To 9/13/77 Probationary (X) 6149
_- n2 3 Final 2/26/74 A
()
wm(1001) CRO-Nuc (P)
Senlodty Date Permanent QC )
Temporary ( )
e
()
5AFETY Careless. works Needs reminding of Exercises norm e
Alert to safety unsafely. Poor safety rules. Has had r ardin se rules.
hazards. Excellent accident f.ecord.
some accidents.
record.
safety record.
Comments:
IUDGEMENT Poor judgement.
Han di!!!culty Generally uses tionally good Quite often makes reasoning thlags good judgeme.
j gement and Ability to ansees facts make serious errors.
through.
common sense, decisions.
Comments:
-i RELIABILITY Can rarely be Can only be Generally can be Can be depended depended upon.
d w ded p n
@nM upon to work an Ability to perform connstently and when under exceptional manner. 1 gggg observatforn Comments:
1 6
LEADERSHIP No chihty Little ability Satisfactory.
Shows i
demonstrated.
demonstrat Has respect of I
p Ability to direct work of others.
ellow employees.
qualities.
Comments: //4 C "7
/4 J Tk 7'6 b #p e W -# A T*
]
he e b L.-
7" s SL#
- t. o a J > e rJ..,D e is. Ls 7y O
ou*=a-wh
/ veroll knowledge INOWLEDGE OF 10B Shows lack of Iob knowledge knowledge on lacking in certai of the job.
knowledge of'all Basic understanding of the essen-tial elements that constitute the I
CI*C8 P
d resent P
i theory and practice of the job.
N Comments:
QUANTITY OF WORE Unsatisfactory.
Slow worker.
Meets job Above average Amount of work produced in the
- 9 required time.
Comments:
QUALITY OF WORE Unacceptable.
Work needs Meets job require.
Work above checking but ments with little standard. Neat oug and
.g g generall checking.
and careful.
_emab..
Coenments:
/
SELF IMPROVEMENT No interest in Has evidenced Has engaged in self Exceptional in additional education interest in self improvement and self improvement Voluntary activity to improve or self help.
improvemen outside activity.
cmd outside employees potential for oc,g,g,y,
,egi,;,;,,,
advancement.
Comments:
some es
O
~
O D
I PUBUC CONTACTS Poor customer Fair customer rela-Handles custe-2.m;;...;
tomer7 relations.
tion Shoul well.
relations.,-
Dealings with customers.
Comments:
SElf REUANCF,--. INITIATIVE Must be told what to Usually goes ahead.
Needs little or no Seeks what is to do. Needs constant Needs urging to get urging. Does what he be done and Ability displayed in taking lade-pushing.
things done.
is supposed does it.
pendent action within the limits of the job.
Comments:
ABII.ITY TO II.ARN Has trouble learning.
Slow to learn.
Learne fairly easily:
Quick to learn.
Ability to grasp new ideas and concepts.
Comments:
APPUCATION Very poor. Uses little Ap lies himself.
Does an acceptable Applies himself an enwt to soln N
s em Wng.
Joh NWs Hule w nE Wes Use of previously acquired knowl-Problems.
no urging.
av edge to perform duties most effeo.
tively.
Comments:
/
v COOPERATIVENESS Resists new methods.
Occasionally has Usually very Gets along Irrit l'8 P'OP e al-roblems getting cooperative. Good extremel well with l
Ability to get along with others m at c natantly.
ong with thers.
team worker.
ot I nt to produce a smoothly operating work force.
Comments:
OBSERVANCE OF RUI.ES AND Muet be constantly Minor Infractions.
Oboerves.
Observes all rules reminded of rules and and regulations EUI.ATIONS regulations. Numerous and reminds others or serious infractions.
to do the same.
Comments:
PERSONA!. APPEAR /.NCE Exceptional ( )
Appropriate Careless
()
ATTENDANCE /PUNCTUAUTY Excellent
()
Satisfactory Erratic
()
Mf3* 8 5 I' 2 A*3
^'C 54-7, J e,.6
-E Supervise s Comm.nts f L.
y4 S~
nL FM7 3 e I,;,.
.J a+
-r L p n.,,,, n r.,
31+ 6 bd A A M/
.I C A o.
- /
a j 4..
Supervisor's Signature:
1 Employee's Comments Employee's Signature:
Discussed with Employee on -
g,; :.;
r.4 m.
I L. Va U '-
=
- pg urraoroLITAN EDISON COMPANY EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL REPORT Name Charles E. Husted Employee No.
6149 From9/14/77 To __10/13/77 Probanonary (X) 1 1 3 Final Class 18 canon (1001) CRO-Nuc (P) senisty Date 2/26/74 Annual
()
Permanent ($
Temporary ( )
Periodic
()
l 3AFETY Careless, works Needs remind!nq of Esercises normal eme Alert to safety unsafely. Poor safety rules. Has had r ding safety rules.
hasards. ExceHeat accident record.
so:ne accidents.
d.
safety record.
Comments:
i IUDGEMENT Poor judgement.
Mas difficulty Generally uses Es
' nouy good Quite of ten makes reasoning thlags good judgement.
1 tand Ability to assess facts and mak*
sMous errors.
through mm d s asana
/.
Comments:
ItELIABUJTY Con rarely be Can or.ly be Generall Can be de aded to gain confidence of others.y and l
depended upon dependheen be Ability to perfonn consistend depended upon.
upon.
upon to wo in an wtwa under exceptional manner.
obsarvation.
Comments:
6 LEADEllSHIP No chility Little ability Sadsfactory.
Shows good demonstrated.
demonstrated.
Has respect of leadership Ability to direct work of others.
fellow employees.
qualities.
V Comments:
l ENOWLEDGE OF IQB Shows lack of Job knowledge Overall knowledge Ouw-uting Basic understanding of the essen-knowledge on lacking in certain of the job.
knowledge of an tici elements that constitute the odnary jobs.
areas l
theory and practice of the job.
jf.
phasse of prenant i
4*
Comrnents:
- N < O
,/ e'v. v se s v -)
TUe 3#'b QUANTITY OF WORK Unsatisfactory.
Slow worker.
Meets job Above average Amount of work produced in the
9"I"**
Pd"*"***
required tinw.
/p Comments:
J QUALITY OF Woltz Unaeceptable.
Work needs Meets job require.
Work above 8 nees d
checking but ments with uttle standard. Neat ther k
~'~M'tary M s.
accepteb[e.
- checking, and careful depe 9'""II 1#
Ceaunents:
I SEIIIMPROVEMENT No interest in Has evidenced Has engaged in self Exceptional in Voluntary activity to lasprove additional education interest in self improvement and self improvement
- mP oyees potential for or self help.
Improvement outside activity.
and outside l
advanament.
ae,g,gg, p
- acevlees, Comments:
mee as
PUBUC CONTACTS Poor customer yair customer rela.
Handles customers Excenent custome relatmas.
tions. Should improve well.
relanons.
Deahngs with customem with esperience.
/f rwa==nts:
SE!I RELIANCE--INTTIATIVE Must be told what to Usually goes chead.
Needs little or no Seeks what is to do. Needs constant Needs urging to get urgir.g Does what he be done and Ability displayed in t&ng inde, pushing.
things done.
is supposed to do.
does it.
pendent action within the limits of y
the job.
- - - - - - l Comments:
ABILITY TO LEARN Has trouble learning.
Slow to learn.
Imarns fairly easily:
Quick to learn.
Poor retention.
Retains information.
rstains well.
Good retention.
l, Ability to grasp new ideas and
- i.. -
Comments:
APPLICATION Very poor. Uses little Applies himself.
Does em acceptable Applies himself or no effort to solve Needs some urging.
Job. Needs little or well. Uses Use of previously acquired knowl.
problems.
no urging.
available edge to perform duties most offec.
y tively.
Comments:
COOPERAT!VENESs Resists new methods.
Occasionany has Usually very Gets.along
- People d.
pmblems geuing mopemhe. Good edrmely won Mt Ability to get alo by operating with others most constantly.
along Mth thm.
team wo ot Exco ent to produce a smoot work force.
Comments:
OBSERVANCE OF RULES AND Must be constantly Minor infractions.
Observes.
Observes all rule re ed of Mes and and r%h REGULATIONS regulations. Numerous and reminds other or serious infractions, to do the same.
Comments:
1 PERSONAL APPEARANCE Exceptional ( )
Appropriate (
Careless
()
ATTENDANCE / PUNCTUALITY Escenent
()
Sottsfactory (s.;r'"
Erratic
()
//
Supervisor's Comments /br T
bs
.O vee tv i 3:.
w
,1
}
. v%} _
m.a e
/
_ s u_ _.., _, g v,, ],)n.,'
mu hScww L..-
c.\\7c, A),
,jj j
,A & N '
_ Supervisor's Signature:. 3 m.'/Md JW Employee's Comments
/
Employee's Signature:
macussed with Esoployee on
l a
' Ng METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL REPORT Charles E. Husted Name-
_ Employee No. 6149 From 10/14/77, 11/12/77 p g 7
(z 1 2 X Final Classiscation (10011 CRO-Nuc (P)
Seniority Date 2/26/74 Annual
(
Permanent (X)
Temporary ()
Periodie (l'
i SAFETY Careless. works Needs remind!ng of Exeretsee nor:nal care Alert to safety unsolely. Poor safety rules. Has had r
ding safety rules.
hazards. Excellen j accident record.
some accidents.
safety reco safety record.
Comments:
l JUDCL' MENT Poor judgement.
Has difficu;ty Generally uses sty to as m iaes and mas
= a "$^9 *h' Saas i"ds=*='-
Excle tionally gooc o"ia a'*= =*=
i s- ='==d l
'h' "'
y'**'""*""*****{
dem Comments.
l I
REUABIUTY Con rarely be l
Can only be Generally can be Can be depended e ~ ~m' a "#e a e a
a "#*
~
I az ax#
m,r,.,.rIorm co,is,. a yand to gain confidence of others.
I obsarvation.
t i
Comments:
i
\\
IE.ADERSHIP No ability 1.ittle ability Satisfactory.
Shows i
demonstrcted.
demoratrated.
Has roepect of I
'p Ability to direct work of others.
follow employees.
ties.
Comments:
KNOWI. EDGE OF ICB Shows lack of Tob knowledge Over a!! knowledge Outstanding Basic understanding of the essen.
knowledge on lacking in certain of the job.
knowledge of all ;
tial elements that constitute the ordinary jobs.
areas.
phases of present theory and practice of the job.
/
lob.
Comments:
N I' j' ' M
/ he l
/k d-e-d'e e p fi tv.t i
.wt(N'k. f>l. c/gf a Ivi r
- v.~ v
//
kw>
\\
r i
QUANTITY OF WORK Unsatisfactory.
Slow worker.
Meets job Above average Amount of work produced in the r*quirements-Produdon.
required time.
pf Comments:
I QUAUTY OF WORE Unacceptable.
Work needs Meets job require.
Work above checking but monts with little standard. Neat depe g
d&g.
MM
,[e o
.11 p
p Comments:
SELF IMPROVEMENT No interest in Hes evidenced Has engaged In self Exceptional in Voluntary activity to impreve additional education interest In nell improvement and self improvement i
l
- mployees potential for or self help.
Improvement
,,, outside activity, and outside alvoncwment.
a d vi g. V
- octMdes, Comments:
seen se
~
PUBLIC CONTACTS Poor customer Fair customer rela-Handles customers Excellent custome:
relations.
tions. Should improve well.
relations.
Deahngs with customers.
with experience.
Comments:
SELF RELIANCE-INITIATIVE Must be told what to Usually goes chead.
Needs little or no Seeks what is to do. Needs constant Needs urging to get urging. Does what he be done and Abdity displayed in taking ind*
pendent action within the limits of pushing.
things done.
is supposed to do/.
does it.
the job.
Comments:
ABILITY TO LEARN Has trouble learning.
Slow to learn.
Learns fairly easuy:
Quick to learn. ;
Po r retention.
Retains information.
retains well Good retention. '
Abutty to grasp new ideas W concepw.
Comments:
APPUCATION Very poor. Uses little Applies hirnself.
Does an acceptable Applies himself or no effort to solve Needs some urging.
Job. Needs little or well. Uses Use of previously acquired knowl-edge to perform duties most effeo.
problems.
no urging.
avanable tively.
y Comments:
COOPERATIVENE55 Resists new methods.
Occasionally has Usually very Gets along Imtetes people al-problems getting cooperative. Good extremel well wit)
Ab to g' ith e
as hc most coratantly, along with others, team worker, othere.
I nt work force.
Comments:
OBSERVANCE OF RULES AND Must be constantly Minor lafractions.
Observes.
Observes all r. des REGULATIONS reminded of rules and and regulations regulations. Numerous and reminds others or serious infractions.
L
to do the same.
Comments:
PERSONAL APPEARANCE Exceptional ( )
Appropriate ( [
Careless
()
ATTENDANCE, PUNCTUALITY Excellent
()
Satisfactory (f > ~
Erratic
()
Supervisor's Comments / fu
. %M m ta c. c.
E o : r'rs. ; r!. -
4b h /f
(' t c' I
/
.;t ut.vetA e Y r
.=c
..m.,,, /,$Y a h e %w
}' Qfw t.gy g k to ct, J
/~
{
. wt C WG~: See c,e L,9 n. <y:w Superv igna h! N l?v%M J
w
)
Employ s Commente 1
i
_. Employee's Signature: _
Discussed with Employee on
J L
May 13, 1986 UNITED STATES ON AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE In the Matter of
)
)
GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES
)
NUCLEAR CORPORATION
)
Docket No. 50-289 (CH)
)
(Three Mile Island Nuclear
)
Station, Unit No. 1)
)
)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of Scott E. Barat's letter of May 13, 1986 and enclosed documents were served on the follow-ing by deposit in the U.S. mail, first class, postage prepaid, or, as indicated by one asterisk, by Federal Express, this 13th day of May, 1986.
Morton B. Margulies, Esquire Administrative Law Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 George E. Johnson, Esquire Office of Executive Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
-~
9 Docketing and Service Section Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Ms. Louise Bradford Three Mile Island Alert 1011 Green Street i
Harrisburg, PA 17102 Michael Maupin, Esquire Hunton & Williams P. O. Box 1535 Richmond, VA 23212
- i Scott E.
Barat I
I _.-.-.
-.. ~ -.,..