ML20197G673

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Listed Addl Documents Responsive to Request 1 of TMI Alert First Request for Production of Documents & First Interrogatories to Gpu.Certficate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence
ML20197G673
Person / Time
Site: Three Mile Island Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/13/1986
From: Barat S
SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
To: Bradford L
THREE MILE ISLAND ALERT
References
CON-#286-170 CH, NUDOCS 8605160357
Download: ML20197G673 (16)
v • d • e


Text

_- _ _ __ _ ._ __ _ _ .-

j d evu w canurvene t a

SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTs & TROWBRIDGE A pamTNERSMep aNCLuD'NG pmOFESSIONAL CompORAftONS 1800 M STRE ET. N. W.

WA$MINGTON. D. C. 20036 maMSaw o. pOTTS. p C. STEVEN M LuCA S.

  • C. (202)8221000 TMOMa5 C. MILL E. Sut SemaGuE ETEvamT L. p,TTMaN. p C DAvio M musENSTEeN. p C - L. ovaNE CMEEm oOaNE r. msECMEL m ETEp*eEN o pOTTS. P C. Marsas r. Tmav TELECOpiEm MiCMaEL m MacoEN emuCE e McELvEiN*

c Emato CManNorr. p C. vsCTomaa J. PE m'E SO-Diaz, min S.

  • C o C. matpH A. Tavtom. Ja ataN o waSSERMAN JOM N N O NE'LL Jm p C- ALLEse J. mLE th wetsEm? waSMeNGTON is PMsu* o. eOSTwicm. P C. Jat A. EPSTIEN. p C. (202}S22-1099 6.822s199 MANNAM E. M uteEmMaN DOROYMEa w. OsCKERMaN
m. TtMOTMy *.aesLON. p C. a lN
  • GEOmGE M NOGEmS.Jm.p.C. JEFFE nv L vasLON.
  • C. - JuD8TM a SaNDLE R JACm McmAv.
  • C
  • m JONaTM DOUGLASAN L MT. C.LLE ROE FAED a LITTLE* P C maplFaz 600 TM'CManO OMAS E.A. SaMp CmOCmEn. Jse meCManD e AN$naCHER JOMN el mMsNELaNOER, p C. Hammv M. GL ASSP'EGEL meCE w C*uRCMmuo C.

LEkL'E a NICMOLSON. Jm . , c T7,0,Mfy ,Mg.m"'Cm

, a se2 eO72 Tm?Ma mgNNETH m MLLE n

.M" ban.. @ aks M 0oTA EVANS MUSER MARTIN O amaLL PC pe utqr M,sC,m,Ev. ,Je- 5 -

  1. // JOMNM.MOmE JUDY wEsSaumG*e JAv E. SmBERG. P C.
  • NCSEnv M GORDON Em QI ' paub S **LE Cm i ETMaN J FmiE DMaN E

E'">"m'a"E v"a"*E ' J.'TE* Egv = EAEm t - $25*dsMa*'A* _ ,/ "4"e'Oh?.*f"iE.i ?E "'N"E vT *Ju'TC"MiNC S.

most ANN SuLuvaN

m. mENLv wEeSTEn. p C.

NaTMaNsEL e emE Eo. Ja . a c. M,,

cto,y,,L E, ,a o,Ma,,M,E,.,S, o.',ganLE'SMawtAw s StaNtEv M mamG LESu SwiTM e4Reana e MAN *i*s4N MammauGENeuCa.*C.

sm E,.,a,g, .,,,, uowo,a, a,,,y t ,a yy' ce TRavta S T. enO*N. Jn JOSEp mO=E RTe E. M mE.NDau s' . a , vino,N,, o,,,CE

. EmMEST c eLamt. Jm . p C. STrpMEN e MEiM ANN o Giova*eNe AMELa M ANDERSON A*eNE Mamet pt CMT CAmLETO's S JONE S. p C.

TMCMas a BastvEm p C. ","a[O M SM EmMAN

= e508 FanM CmEDet gd uaNDER E TOMASZCM JOMN N NaS$enAS HP diane 5. SMapano SMELDON J. WEtSEL p C EFFREY J A. Geses J. PaTmeCm MsCmEv. P C.

BORAM e. SauSE m

,4 , MCLEaN. VIRGg 2'02 Au mENCE W CO*e E N C#iSTEENA G. NASEnt J TMO**a S LE NMa mT.

  • C. ha M PC3 9 ?SO g E R,E,", *g hD,E,"Cm a m NF EE STEVE N L. ME L Z E R.
  • C. go ,% u TMOM envSouA S ,,* ,

FFREY m SNvDEm* SUSAN C. LONGP . MEET **

DEAN D. AubfCa. p JO*e ps E NG E L p C. ,C ggomog r aggmsowy, gm .*,,* . /* =i, anvL ANNE LANDER MiCMAEL C. **OETE LL JaCmm.MonN ELEcopiEn g JOMN J M AN DL E R**

C. TMOMas MaCMS m. p C.. SETM *e MOOGASlaN ( -

Mium D.Po.mTER LtEN SMEm FF SCOTT E. samaT

  1. C a t mT E . COM N CMamLES e TEMm*N.
  • C-SMEsL A McC HamvEY POKeepe( ANeTa J. FseemELSTEIN LE SUE C. ZIMSERG**

DEUSSA a. N'DG*av '-* ji J ANET C. MECu*

STE pMEN e MUTTLE R, p C.

w NTMNOp N seO*N. p C.

MENNETMJ MayTMaN oaveD LawmENCE M4LEm*

_e FRED DmaSNEm 'p [ [DaveD

' JE rFREv m C SowOO4NSaMe TaalN

w. maMpELMAN diane MONTLLOR wmeG mENonA A. GALL AGME' n.MT**

JaME S e MaMu's. P C. FmEDE meCm L KLEiN #

/ RENNETH a. GALLO DomOTMv a. SCMLOTM*

GwaNDALe mELL eC. STEVEN p psTL E m t.Jo**M.F1DE, ALT DaygO m LEW'S NANCY C. WAGNEm R. SCOTT CUSTEn. Ja m'CManD J name.NO ,NQ4 e A. pavnsCm LEeGMTON HI n

  • nose RT E. 2aseLE n. P C. ELLE N A. FRE DEL ' _ JEFFIDEY G. BEmMaN LLv M. CAmME ME'CMARD S*

C. DONaLDSON*

nosERT e monesNS.

  • C. ManiE N. DOL AND* NF CM - mEviN FLYNN CSet L MQQRES GEORGE F, TmOWSmeOGE e 8sOf aceeME O e O C.

COUNSEL

  • aoMeno see vememia May 13, 1986 wn tem S o.mECT o.AL NuMBEm (202) 955-3268 l
BY FEDERAL EXPRESS -

Ms. Louise Bradford Three Mile Island Alert "

1011 Green Street Harrisburg, PA 17102 Re: In the Matter of General Public Utilities Nuclear Corporation (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit No. 1), Docket No. 50-289 (CH)

Dear Louise:

Today we located additional documents responsive to Re-quest No. 1 of "TMIA's First Request for Production of Docu-ments and First Interrogatories to General Public Utilities Nuclear." Accordingly, enclosed please find:

(1) Metropolitan Edison Company Employee Appraisal Report of Charles E. Husted for the period from 2/26/74 to 3/27/74; (2) Metropolitan Edison Company Employee Appraisal Report of Charles E. Husted for the period from 3/28/74 to 4/27/74;  ;

(3) Metropolitan Edison Company Employee Appraisal Report of Charles E. Husted for the period from 4/28/74 to 5/17/74; 8605160357 860513 9 gDR ADOCK 0500 g 3

_ - _ _ _ __l

e

,s SH Aw, PITTM AN, PoTTs & TROWBRIDGE A PARTNERS *P INCLuOspeG PROFESS *0NAL CORPORATCNS Ms. Louise Bradford Page two May 13, 1986 (4) Metropolitan Edison Company Employee Appraisal Report of Charles E. Husted for the period from 8/15/77 to 9/13/77; (5) Metropolitan Edison Company Employee Appraisal Report of Charles E. Husted for the period from 9/14/77 to 10/13/77; and (6) Metropolitan Edison Company Employee Appraisal Report of Charles E. Husted for the period from 10/14/77 to 11/12/77.

Sincerely, Scott E. Barat Enclosures cc: Service List (attached w/encls.)

1 v -

- - ~ c.- v ,

. 1 Mishm METRSPOLITAN EDISEN CSMPANY EMPt,0YEE APPRAISAL REPORT Name Charles E. Husted Er4ployee No. 6149 __ rrom 2-26-74 To 3-27-74 Probatiom (;

(1070) Aux Opr="A"-Nuclear (P) k l S*niority Date 2-26-74 Classincation Temporary ()

Annual (

Permanent 5) Periodie (

SAFETY Careless, works Needs reminding of Exerciou normal care Alert to safety !

unsolely. Poor safety rules. Has had regarding safety les. hazards. Escelle accident record. some accidents. Good y ed. safety record.

Comments:

JUDGEMENT Poor judgement. Han difficulty Generally uses tionally go Ability to asene facts and make Quite often makes reasoning thlags good judgement. Es)gement J anc serious errors. through. common sense decisions. 1 Comments:

RELIABILITY Con reely be Can only be Generally can be Can be depende PenM upom & n Abtlity to perform consistentl to gain confidence of others.y and g un ce o l oburvation.

Comments: i e

LEADERSHIP No ability j Little ability Satisfactory. Shonsgood Ability to direct work of others. I demonstrated. demonstrated. as respect of leaderahlp p fellow employees. qualitiee.

Comments:

INOWLEDGE OF JQB Shows lack of Tob knowledge o r.all knowledge Outstanding Basic understanding of the essen. knowledge on lacking in certain of e.e job. knowled tial elemen:s that constitute the

""#Y I areas.  % ge of prese a theory and practice of the job. l Comments:

QUANTITY OF WORE Unsatisfactory. Slow worker. Meets job Above average Amount of work produced in the ** * *^

required time. M[

Comments:

QUALITY OF WORE Unocceptable. Work needs Meets job rquire. Work above Accur . thoroughness and checking but ents with little standard. Neat depend ility of results. generall checidng. and careful.

,- tabb. W Comments:

SELF IMPROVEMENT No interest in Has evidenced Has engaged in self Exceptional in Voluntary activity to improve additional education interest in self improvement and improveman employees potential for or self help. improvement and outside l

advancement. -

,c,i,3,y, outside activity, p gegg, gig,,,

Comments:

mee se u *N N

-ee6uev

l E -

l PUBUC CONTACTS Poor customer Fair custo tions. Sh*I ylg Handles customers wett Excellent cuhtome:

relanons. relations. 1 D=atmgs with customern-with LIIT e I 3 F*

Comments: gjl'I SELF REUANCE-INITIATIVE Must be told what to Usually goes chead. Needs little or no Seeks what is to do. Needs constant Needs urging to get 'ng. Does what he be done and Ability displayed in taking inde. pushing. things done. is supposed to do. does it.

pendent action within the limits of the job.

Y -

t'n==ents :

ABILITY TO LEARN Has trouble learning, Slow to learn. fairly easily: Quick to learn.

Poor retention. Retains information. retains well. Good retention.

Ability to grasp new ideas and concepts. h Comments:

APPLICATION Very poor. Uses little Applies himself. an acceptchle Applies himself

"" 'II ' ' " " d* * ** "#9 9' * * ' " "

Use of previous! acquired knowl.

Problems.

'no urging. " **II' avai lab edge to perform duties most effee.

tively.

Comments:

COOPERATIVENESS Resists new methods. Oceastono!!y has Usually very Gets.along Irntates people al. problems getting tive. Good extremel well wit ho most constantly. along with others. werker. othe m llent to p odu a: 1 ly work force.

Comments:

OBSERVANCE OF RULES AND Must be constantly Minor infrections. Observes, prves all rule REGULATIONS reminded of rules and j and regulations regulations. Numerous y and reminds other

_or serious infractions. __

to do the amne.

Comments:

  • , Wh M A -
    • U5IVEg PERSONAL APPEARANCE Exceptional ( ) Appropriate Careless () I??. Agg ATTENT ANCE/PUNCTUAUTY Excellent () Satisfactory Erratic

()M 3 197d

'""~~-

supervisors Comm.nts -

r. p gp.y MET - ED CD._ _

_ S-so<s Si,no,.e _v, cA&

Employee's Comments ..- 9 .__. M us6ek M b A m M* 4 ~ L LJ N & ed m a A m u ;i& L,1h i

5/ A ~4 4 m/ - d

- ,e. . 5/als Em ,ioy.e.s S1gn ,e:

(2/(/M

g METROP3UTAN EDISON COMPANY EMPLOYEE APPRAtsAL REPont Name Charles E. Husted Employee No. _3IN9 From 3-28-70 To 0-27-74__ Probadonasy (.'

(1070) Aux Opr "A"-Nuclear (Prob) I &3 Final r tw9 cation Seniority Date 2-26-74 Annual (

Permanent (x) Temporary ( ) Periodic (

1 SAFETY Careless. works Needs reminding of Exercises normal cure Alert to safety -

unse!ely. Poor safety rules. Has had og safety rules. hazards. Excene accident record. some accidents. safety recor safety record.

Comments:

JUDGEMENT Poor judgement. Has difficulty Gumuseliy uses Exce onaHy goc Quite often makes reasoning things good judgement. j gement and Ability to assess facts and make sedous omrs, through.

decisions. , gl ma m.

Comments:

RELIABILITY Can rcrsly be ,

Ccn only be can be Can be depende

'P*n uM 4*n uPon & pend n. uponto M lac Ability to perform consistently and to gain confidence of others w a under , *Wod mann

! obsarvation. .  !

Comments:

i .

LEADERSHIP _ No chility i Little ability Satisfactory. Shows good demonstrated. clemonstrated. Has respect of '

Ability to direct work of others. leadership follow emple qualities. ,

Comments:

I ENOWLEDGE OF IQB Shows lack of + Iob knowledge Over<ill knowledge Outstanding !

knowledge on j lacking in certain of the job. knowledge of al Basic understanding of the essen.

tial el.m.nis that constitute th. " * "'Y * - "*"'- j Phmes preeen j r theory and practice of the job.

Comments l

QUANTITY OF WORK Unsatisfactory. Slow worker. Meets job Above avemge Amount of work produced in the r"drernent8-

. Prod required time.

Comments:

QUALITY OF WORK Unacceptable. Work needs Meets job r uire. Work above g,gg,omy a "j"g"' ,

    • 2e*A." a.d .J."i.

Comments:

SELF IMPROVEMENT No interest in Hes evidenced Has engaged in self Esceptional in additier al education interest in self improveme and Y'I""Y ' # 'Y I'"P'

employees popanal for or self help. improvement outside 'vity, self improvement ;

and outside i odvancement. activity. activides. I Comments:

mee se ,

m _ m . m _n seer 3 M

l Poor customer Fair customer rela- Handles customers Excenent cu'stomer '

PUBLIC CONTACTS **

reasons. bons. **i"'"

Deaungs with customers- w th .

Comments: ,

) ,

SELF RELIANCE-INITIATIVE Must be told what to Usually goes chead. Needehnlmeeno seeks what is to do. Needs constant Needs urging to get targmy. Does what he be done and Ability displayed in taking inde- pushing. things doce. is suppo to do. does it.

pendent action within the limits of the job.

th= ants:

ABILITY TO LEARN Has trouble learning. Slow to learn. Learns fairly easily; Quick to loarn.

P or retention. Retains information. retains well. Good retention.

Abihy 2 pp ww idus d conc

  • Pts.

(hmants:

APPLICATION Very poor. Uses little Applies himself. Does an acceptable Apphes himself or no effort to solve Needs some urging. job.Need well. Uses Use of previously acquired know!- problems. no urging available edge to perform duties most effec. ,.

tively.

Comssents:

l COOPERATIVENESS Resists new methods. Occasionally han UsueHy very Gets along Irntates people al- problems getting cooperative. Good extremel well wit!

m et c natantly. along with others. team worke others.hicellent to roduce a sm t ly pe ng team worker.

k im.

Comments:

OBSERVANCE OP RULES AND Must he constantly Minor infractions. Observes. Observes all rulee -

reminded of rules and and regulations RENTIONS regulations. Numerous and reminds othen or serious infractions. to do the same.

Comments:

PERSONAL APPEARANCE Exceptional ( ) Appropriate C Careless ()

ATTENDANCE/ PUNCTUALITY Excellent () Satisfactory ( Erratic ()

Supervuor's Comments

- __ Supervisor's Signature: , _ _ , _

'~ '

I*

Employee's Comments _ . -

ca .3 ; .a Pf.3 k s.-.A.

y

-g g, DEPL Employee a Signature.

[ --

l Discussed with Employee em //- 20 W C --M Mn

  • I S

l g METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL REPORT

%_ Charles E. Husted to No. 6149 Froml +-28-7I' To 3-I7-74 Probationary (>

(1070) Aux Opr "A"-Nuclear (Prob) 90th day 5-27-7f+

1 2 A Final Classification Seniority Date 2-26-786 , Annual (

Permanent (3 Temporary () Periodic (

SAFETY Careless. works Needs renund:ng of ' Ezeretsee normal care Alert to safety unsafely. Poor safety rules. lies had regarding sciety rules. hazards. Excelle:

accident record. some accidents. Good saf safety record.

Comments:

JUDGEMENT Poor judgement. Has ddficulty reasoning things M uses Enceptionany goc Quity of ten makes good judgeme judgement and Ability to assess facts and make decisions.

S* m u8

  • m r8- drou9 common sense.

Comments:

i RELIABILITY Can - : rely be l Can enly be M can be Can be depende-depended upon. l :1er. ended upon on. upon to work In e Ability to perform consistently and when under depended up/ exceptional mann to gain confidence of others. I o h adon. V Comments:

i .

LEADERSHIP No ability i Lit:le ability Satisfactory. Shows good Ability to direct work of others. demonstrated. demonstrated. Has respect of leadership fellow em s. qualities.

Comments:

KNOWLEDGE OF JOB Shows lack of Tob knowledge Overell knowledge Outstanding Bhaic understanding of the essen. "#."

  • 9* " "Y'"**'"" I# " 9' '

""'I N "'*" N"*** ***"

tial elements that constitute the theory and practice of the job. '

Comments:

QUANTITY OF WORK Unnatisfactory. Slow worker. i Meets job Above average Amount of work produced in the requirements. production.

re,..d ume. y Comments:

QUALITY OF WORK Unacceptable. Work needs Meete job require. Work above checking but ments with little standard. Neat

%#E*y J' 2" ""' 9'a;=n, re. ***i=9- yP**'='

Comments:

I SELF IMPROVEMENT No interest in Has evidenced Has engaged la self Exceptional in additional education inicest in self improvement and Vole'Y actiMtY b We or soif help. impronment outside aet-self improvement and outside employees potential for .

advancement. g g , ',, ,egggg, i

Comments:

mee se

]

1

l

.5.g , : .. -.v - . - d . i . E CO2 'XI PUBLIC CONTACTS Poor customer Fair customer rela. Hcndles customers relations, tions. Should improve Excellent customer Declings with customers, wel!. relations" with experience.

Comments:

SE!I RELIANCE-INTTIATIVE Must be told what to Usua!!y goes ahead. Need m no do. Needs cons: ant Seeks what is to Ability diaplayed in taking ind*

Needs urging to get urging. Does what he be done and pendent act,on within the limits of pushing things done. is supposed .

does it.

the job.

Comments:

ABIUTY To I. EARN Nas trouble learning. Slow to learn.

Poor retention.

I.earnspeasity: Quick to learn.

Ability to grasp new ideas and Retains information. retaans well. Good retennen.

concepk. y

,f Comments:

APPLICATION Very poor. Uses litti. Applies himself. Does an aces table Applies hims.11 Use of previously acquired know!-

edge to perform duties most effee. '"*N"'".

Problems

' ' ** "'Y "9 ' I~

no urgin U'**

    • U'lable avai uveur. ~ s.

Comments:

COOPERATIVENES8 Resists new methods. Occasionally has Usually very Gets along Irritates people al- problems getting

, h work force.

as ly ope g most constantly. along with others, cooperative. Good team worker.

extremel well with others. llent Comments:

OBSERVANCE OF RUI.ES AND Must be constantly Minor infractions. Observes. Observes all rules REGULATIONS reminded of rules and and regulations requictions. Numerous

_or serious infractions. I

[n p ApJo4hes==_. and reminds others Commenis:

~ ~ n ...',

', & a PERSONAL APPEARANCE Exceptional ( ) Appropriate ([ Careless () ' 'I '

ATTENDANCE/PUNCTUALITY Excellent () Satisfactory ( Erratic PE!jSG';s.af. 3EPh <

Supervisor's Comments - + - '_

i ~

//

4 ,

Superviser's Signature: , _

Employee's Comments -

Ml

/ , -

g,.-

Employee's Signature:. .- -

  • l Discussed with Employee on / -/
r. - m
t. %. .-f';,& , .?k..a. -e

~

mg METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL REPORT 6149 FroJ/15/77 To 9/13/77 Name Charles E. Husted Employee No. _

Probationary (X)

_- n2 3 Final wm(1001) CRO-Nuc (P) Senlodty Date 2/26/74 A ()

Permanent QC ) Temporary ( ) e ()

5AFETY Careless. works Needs reminding of Exercises norm e Alert to safety unsafely. Poor safety rules. Has had r ardin se rules. hazards. Excellent accident f.ecord. some accidents. record. safety record.

Comments:

IUDGEMENT Poor judgement. Han di!!!culty Generally uses tionally good Quite often makes reasoning thlags good judgeme . j gement and Ability to ansees facts make serious errors. through. common sense, decisions.  ;

Comments:

-i RELIABILITY Can rarely be Can only be Generally can be Can be depended Ability to perform connstently and depended upon. d w ded p n @nM upon to work an

,, gggg when under exceptional manner. 1 observatforn l Comments: 1 l

6 LEADERSHIP No chihty Little ability Satisfactory. Shows i demonstrated. demonstrat Has respect of I p I Ability to direct work of others. ellow employees. qualities.  ;

"7 /4 J Tk 7'6 b #p e W -# A T*

Comments: //4 C ]

- he e b L .- 7" s SL# t. o a J > e rJ. . ,D e is . Ls 7y ,

INOWLEDGE OF 10B Shows lack of Iob knowledge / veroll O knowledge ou*=a-wh I knowledge on lacking in certai of the job. knowledge of'all Basic understanding of the essen-CI*C8 d resent l tial elements that constitute the I P P i theory and practice of the job. - -- N Comments:

QUANTITY OF WORE Unsatisfactory. Slow worker. Meets job Above average Amount of work produced in the **9 * * * * '

required time.

Comments:

QUALITY OF WORE Unacceptable. Work needs Meets job require. Work above oug checking but ments with little standard. Neat

  • and generall checking.

.g g and careful.

_emab .. _

Coenments:

/

SELF IMPROVEMENT No interest in Has evidenced Has engaged in self Exceptional in additional education interest in self improvement and self improvement Voluntary activity to improve or self help. improvemen employees potential for outside activity. cmd outside oc,g,g,y, ,egi,;,;,,,

advancement.

Comments:

some es

O O D I

~

l Poor customer Fair customer rela- Handles custe- _. 2.m;;...; tomer7 PUBUC CONTACTS well. relations. ,-

relations. tion Shoul -

Dealings with customers.

Comments:

SElf REUANCF,--. INITIATIVE Must be told what to Usually goes ahead. Needs little or no Seeks what is to do. Needs constant Needs urging to get urging. Does what he be done and Ability displayed in taking lade- pushing. things done. is supposed does it.

pendent action within the limits of the job.

Comments:

Has trouble learning. Slow to learn. Learne fairly easily: Quick to learn.

ABII.ITY TO II.ARN *" ' '"

  • Ability to grasp new ideas and concepts.

Comments:

APPUCATION Very poor. Uses little Ap lies himself. Does an acceptable Applies himself an enwt to soln N s em Wng. Joh NWs Hule w ,

nE Wes Use of previously acquired knowl- no urging. av edge to perform duties most effeo. Problems.

tively.

Comments:

/

v .

COOPERATIVENESS Resists new methods. Occasionally has Usually very Gets along Irrit l'8 P'OP le al- roblems getting cooperative. Good extremel well with Ability to get along with others m at c natantly. ong with thers. team worker. ot I nt to produce a smoothly operating work force.

Comments:

OBSERVANCE OF RUI.ES AND Muet be constantly Minor Infractions. Oboerves. Observes all rules reminded of rules and and regulations EUI.ATIONS regulations. Numerous and reminds others or serious infractions. to do the same.

Comments:

PERSONA!. APPEAR /.NCE Exceptional ( ) Appropriate Careless ()

ATTENDANCE /PUNCTUAUTY Excellent () Satisfactory Erratic ()

Supervise s Comm.nts Mf3* 8 5 I' 2 A*3 ^'C -

54- 7 , J e,.6 -E f L. y4 S~ nL FM7 3 e I ,;, . .J a+ . -r L p n. , , , , n r.,

31+ 6 bd A A M/ a j 4. . .I C A o. Supervisor's Signature: */

1 Employee's Comments ___.

Employee's Signature:

Discussed with Employee on -

.. l

g ,; :.; ,;;_; . r.4 m.  :: .. I L. Va U '-

=

pg urraoroLITAN EDISON COMPANY EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL REPORT Name Charles E. Husted Employee No. 6149 From9/14/77 To __10/13/77 Probanonary (X) 2/26/74 1 1 3 Final Class 18 canon (1001) CRO-Nuc (P) senisty Date , Annual ()

Permanent ($ Temporary ( ) Periodic

()

l 3AFETY Careless, works Needs remind!nq of Esercises normal eme unsafely. Poor Alert to safety safety rules. Has had r ding safety rules. hasards. ExceHeat accident record. so:ne accidents. d. safety record.

Comments:

i IUDGEMENT Poor judgement. Mas difficulty Generally uses Es ' nouy good Quite of ten makes reasoning thlags good judgement. tand Ability to assess facts and mak* sMous errors. through 1

d s asana mm

/.

Comments:

ItELIABUJTY Con rarely be Can or.ly be Generall dependheen Can be de aded Ability to perfonn consistend depended upon. depended upon upon.be upon to wo in an to gain confidence of others.y and l wtwa under exceptional manner. '

! obsarvation.

Comments: .

6

, LEADEllSHIP No chility Little ability Sadsfactory. Shows good Ability to direct work of others. demonstrated. demonstrated. Has respect of leadership

' fellow employees. qualities.

! V Comments:

l _ _ .

ENOWLEDGE OF IQB Shows lack of Job knowledge Overall knowledge Ouw-uting Basic understanding of the essen- knowledge on lacking in certain of the job. knowledge of an tici elements that constitute the odnary jobs. areas phasse of prenant 1

l theory and practice of the job. jf. 4*

i Comrnents: :N < O TUe

,/ e'v. v se s v -) 3#'b QUANTITY OF WORK Unsatisfactory. Slow worker. Meets job Above average Amount of work produced in the 9"I"**' Pd"*"***

required tinw.

/p Comments:

J QUALITY OF Woltz Unaeceptable. Work needs Meets job require. Work above ther 8knees d checking but ments with uttle standard. Neat

~'~M'tary depe M s. 9'""II accepteb[e.

checking, and careful 1#

Ceaunents:

SEIIIMPROVEMENT No interest in I Has evidenced Has engaged in self Exceptional in Voluntary activity to lasprove additional education interest in self improvement and self improvement

  • mPl oyees potential for or self help. Improvement outside activity. and outside ae,g,gg, p advanament. acevlees, Comments:

mee as

PUBUC CONTACTS Poor customer yair customer rela. Handles customers Excenent custome relatmas. tions. Should improve well. relanons.

Deahngs with customem with esperience.

/f rwa ==nts:

SE!I RELIANCE--INTTIATIVE Must be told what to Usually goes chead. Needs little or no Seeks what is to do. Needs constant Needs urging to get urgir.g Does what he be done and Ability displayed in t&ng inde, pushing. things done. is supposed to do. does it.

pendent action within the limits of y the job. - - - - - - l Comments:

ABILITY TO LEARN Has trouble learning. Slow to learn. Imarns fairly easily: Quick to learn.

Poor retention. Retains information. rstains well. Good retention.

l, Ability to grasp new ideas and

- i. . -

Comments:

APPLICATION Very poor. Uses little Applies himself. Does em acceptable Applies himself or no effort to solve Needs some urging. Job. Needs little or well. Uses Use of previously acquired knowl. problems. no urging. available edge to perform duties most offec.

tively.

y ,,,,,, .

Comments:

COOPERAT!VENESs Resists new methods. Occasionany has Usually very Gets.along

    • People d. pmblems geuing mopemhe. Good edrmely won Mt with others most constantly. along Mth thm. team wo Exco ent Ability to produceto get alo a smoot by operating ot work force.

Comments:

OBSERVANCE OF RULES AND Must be constantly Minor infractions. Observes. Observes all rule REGULATIONS re ed of Mes and and r%h regulations. Numerous and reminds other or serious infractions, to do the same.

Comments:

1 PERSONAL APPEARANCE Exceptional ( ) Appropriate ( Careless ()

ATTENDANCE / PUNCTUALITY Escenent () Sottsfactory (s.;r'" Erratic ()

Supervisor's Comments /br T bs

.O vee tv i 3:. m .a e // w ,1 '

} . v%} _

mu hScww L ..- c.\7c, _ s u_ _ .. , _ , g A),

j v,, ],)n.,' -

/ .! ,jj

' _ Supervisor's Signature:- . 3 m.'/Md JW

,A & N '

Employee's Comments _ _ _

Employee's Signature: ,

/

macussed with Esoployee on

a l Ng METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY EMPLOYEE APPRAISAL REPORT Name- Charles E. Husted _ Employee No. 6149 10/14/77 7 , 11/12/77 p g From _

(z 1 2 X Final Classiscation (10011 CRO-Nuc (P) Seniority Date 2/26/74 Annual (

Permanent (X) Temporary () Periodie (l' i

SAFETY Careless. works Needs remind!ng of Exeretsee nor:nal care Alert to safety unsolely. Poor safety rules. Has had r ding safety rules. hazards. Excellen j accident record. some accidents. safety reco safety record.

Comments: l l

JUDCL' MENT Poor judgement. Has difficu;ty Generally uses o"ia a'*= =*= Saas i"ds=*='- Excle tionally

='==dgooc sty to as m iaes and mas = a'h' "$^9 i s-

"' *h' y'**'""*""*****{i dem l Comments.

l l

I REUABIUTY Con rarely be Can only be Generally can be Can be depended l

a "#e a e a m ,r,. ,.rIorm co ,is,. a yand to gain confidence of others.

I I

az a ax#

obsarvation.

"#* ~

t e ~ ~m' i Comments:

\

i IE.ADERSHIP No ability 1.ittle ability Satisfactory.

i Shows Ability to direct work of others. demonstrcted. demoratrated. Has roepect of I 'p follow employees. ties.

Comments:

1 KNOWI. EDGE OF ICB Shows lack of Tob knowledge Over a!! knowledge Outstanding Basic understanding of the essen. knowledge on lacking in certain of the job. knowledge of all ;

tial elements that constitute the ordinary jobs. areas. phases of present theory and practice of the job. ' / lob.

N I' j' ' M Ivi / he Comments: r -

l

\

/k d- & e-d'e e r

p fi tv .t i v .~ v // f>l.kw>

.wt(N'k. c/gf a i

QUANTITY OF WORK Unsatisfactory. Slow worker. Meets job Above average Amount of work produced in the r*quirements- Produdon.

required time.

pf Comments:

I QUAUTY OF WORE Unacceptable. Work needs Meets job require. Work above checking but monts with little standard. Neat depe o g d&g. MM

.11

,[e p , p ,

Comments:

SELF IMPROVEMENT No interest in Hes evidenced Has engaged In self Exceptional in Voluntary activity to impreve additional education interest In nell improvement and self improvement i

  • mployees potential for or self help. Improvement ,,, outside activity, and outside l

alvoncwment. a d vi g. V octMdes, Comments:

seen se l l

~

. l

l PUBLIC CONTACTS Poor customer Fair customer rela- Handles customers Excellent custome:

. relations. tions. Should improve well. relations.

Deahngs with customers.

with experience.

Comments:

SELF RELIANCE-INITIATIVE Must be told what to Usually goes chead. Needs little or no Seeks what is to Abdity displayed in taking ind* do. Needs constant Needs urging to get urging. Does what he be done and pendent action within the limits of pushing. things done. does it.

is supposed to do/.

the job.

Comments:

ABILITY TO LEARN Has trouble learning. Slow to learn. Learns fairly easuy: Quick to learn. ;

Po r retention. Retains information. retains well Good retention. '

Abutty to grasp new ideas W concepw.

Comments:

APPUCATION Very poor. Uses little Applies hirnself. Does an acceptable Applies himself Use of previously acquired knowl- or no effort to solve Needs some urging. Job. Needs little or well. Uses problems. no urging. avanable edge to perform duties most effeo. '

tively. y Comments:

COOPERATIVENE55 Resists new methods. Occasionally has Usually very Gets along Ab to g' ith e Imtetes people al- problems getting cooperative. Good extremel well wit)

, most coratantly, along with others, team worker, othere.

as hc I nt work force.

Comments:

OBSERVANCE OF RULES AND Must be constantly Minor lafractions. Observes. Observes all r. des REGULATIONS reminded of rules and and regulations regulations. Numerous and reminds others or serious infractions. L to do the same.

Comments:

PERSONAL APPEARANCE Exceptional ( ) Appropriate ( [ Careless ()

ATTENDANCE, PUNCTUALITY Excellent () Satisfactory (f > ~ Erratic ()

Supervisor's Comments / fu

. %M m ta c. c. E o : r'rs. ; r!. - 4b h /f (' t c' I /

.;t ut.vetA e Y r ,% .=c ..m., ,, /,$Y a h e %w $ t.gy g k to ct,

. wt J

C WG~: See c ,e L,9 n . <y:w

/~ {

Superv

}' Qfw h! N l?v%M igna -

w J ' )

Employ s Commente 1

i

_ . Employee's Signature: _ _

Discussed with Employee on

J L

May 13, 1986 UNITED STATES ON AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE In the Matter of )

)

GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES )

NUCLEAR CORPORATION ) Docket No. 50-289 (CH)

)

(Three Mile Island Nuclear )

Station, Unit No. 1) )

)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of Scott E. Barat's letter of May 13, 1986 and enclosed documents were served on the follow-ing by deposit in the U.S. mail, first class, postage prepaid, or, as indicated by one asterisk, by Federal Express, this 13th day of May, 1986.

Morton B. Margulies, Esquire Administrative Law Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

  • George E. Johnson, Esquire Office of Executive Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 ,

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

. -- - - . --- ... -~

9 Docketing and Service Section Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

  • Ms. Louise Bradford Three Mile Island Alert 1011 Green Street i Harrisburg, PA 17102
  • Michael Maupin, Esquire Hunton & Williams P. O. Box 1535 Richmond, VA 23212
i Scott E. Barat I

l 1

I

. _ - - _ . . -. - . . ~ - . , . .

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20197G673&oldid=3010986"