ML20154H172

Notice of Violation from Insp on 880418-22.Violation Noted: Contrary to Tech Spec 6.8.1,Valve ZPS-5878 Incorrectly Tagged as Having Been Placed & Verified in Test Position & Associated Pipe Cap Removed

ML20154H172
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	05/16/1988
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20154H171	List: IR 05000313/1988011 ML20154H166 ML20154H172
References
50-368-88-11, NUDOCS 8805250253
Download: ML20154H172 (1)

Text

,_ _

APPENDIX A l

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Arkansas Power & Light Company Docket: 50-368 Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 Operating License: NPF-6 During'an NRC inspection ~ conducted on April 18-22, 1988, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. The violation involved failure to correctly j follow procedures. In accordance with the "General' Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1987), the violation is listed below*

Technical Specification 6.8.1 requires written procedures be established and implemented for surveillance and test activities of safety-related equipment.

Procedure 1092.031, "Integrated Leak Rate Test," has been established in accordance with this Technical Specification. Appendix M of this procedure requires that manually operated valves be tagged at the valve when placed in the test position or verified in the test position.

Contrary to the above, Valve ZPS-5878 was tagged as having been placed and verified in the test position and the associated pipe cap removed.

However, the valve and pipe cap were not found in the correct test position.

This is a Severity Level IV violation. (Supplement I)(368/8811-01)

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Arkansas Power & Light Company is hareby required to submit to this office, within 30 days of the date ot the luter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation: (1) the reason for the violation if admitted, (2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

DatedatArlington, this /Qfu dayTexas,)7 of f 1988.

8805250253 880516 '

PDR ADOCK 05000313 Q DCD