IR 05000213/1988007

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML20151C771)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-213/88-07 on 880314-17.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plan & Implementing Procedures, Organization,Program Audit,Records & Repts,Testing & Maint, Physical Barriers,Protected & Vital Areas & Lighting
ML20151C771
Person / Time
Site: Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png
Issue date: 04/01/1988
From: Keimig R, Martin W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20151C756 List:
References
50-213-88-07, 50-213-88-7, NUDOCS 8804130169
Download: ML20151C771 (5)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

.

.

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Report No. 50-213/88-07 Docket No. 50-213 License No. OPR-61 Licensee: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company P.O. Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06101 Facility Name: Haddam Neck Nuclear Power Plant Inspection At: Haddam Neck, Connecticut Inspection Conducted: March 14 - 17, 1988 Inspector: *

f #- / - B K

[Wal rG n, Ph ecurity date Approved by: / M- kN Richard R. Keihtgt Ch , Safeguards date g Section, DRSS Inspection Summary: Unannounced, Physical Security Inspection on March 14 -

17, 1988 (Report No. 50-213/88-07 Areas Inspected: Plan and Implementing Procedures; Organization; Program Audit; Records and Reports; Testing and Maintenance; Physical Barriers -

Protected and Vital Areas; Security System Power Supply; Lighting; Assessment Aids; Access Control - Personnel and Packages; Detection Aids - Protected and Vital Areas; Alarm Stations; Communications; and Safeguards Contingency Plan Implementatio Results: The licensee was found to be in compliance with NRC requirements in the areas inspecte *

DR ADOCK 050

_ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _

L

,

.

I DETAILS 1. Key Persons Contacted Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Plant i D. Miller, Station Superintendent E. DeBarba, Station Services Superintendent G. Hallberg, Manager, Nuclear Security P. Marchese, Security Supervisor R. Gill, Security Investigator P. Jewett, Security Coordinator USNRC J. Shedlowski, Senior Resident Inspector R. Bellamy, Chief, Facilities Radiological Safety and Safeguards Branch, Region I (Part-Time)

The inspector also interviewed other licensee personnel and members of the contract guard forc . Security Plan and Implementing Procedures The inspector met with licensee representatives and discussed the

-

NRC-approved Physical Security Plan (the Plan) and its implementing procedures . As a result of these discussions, and a review of the Plan, it was determined that:

(a) implementing procedures were current, clear, concise and consistent with commitments in the pian; and (b) the temporary 10 CFR 50.54(p) change to the Plan submitted to the NRC on June 1, 1987 to accomodate facility construction activities ex;. ires on April 15, 1988. The construction work, which required the change, is currently in progress and is scheduled for ccmpletion prior to that dat . Security Organization The inspector reviewed the security organization and determined that all positions were filled and the organization was established and operating in conformance with the Pla . Security Program Audit The inspector reviewed security program audit reports and verified that the audits had been ennducted in accordance with the Plan. The audits

'

were comprehensive in scope with the audit results reported to the appropriate level of management. The inspector's review included the response of the security organization to the audit findings and the

,

_ _ . - _ - . - _ - _ - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - . _ - - - _ - - _ _ - _ . . _ _ _ _ _ - . - _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ -

- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _

.

.

.

-

corrective action taken to remedy any adverse findings. The documented corrective actions appeared appropriate for the finding . Records Reports The inspector reviewed testing and maintenance records and records of security events, T_esting and Maintenance Records:

The testing and maintenance records committed to in the Plan were on file and readily available for licensee review and NRC inspection, Security Event Reports:

The inspector reviewed, and discussed with the licensee, security >

events87-169 and 88-019 that had been reported to the NRC, in accordance with 10 CFR 73.71(c), since May 1, 1987. No discrepancies were identified relative to reporting the events or the actions take . Testing and Maintenance The inspector reviewed the testing anJ maintenance records and procedures for the intrusion detection system, card read?rs, X-ray machines, metal detectors, explosives detectors, and assessment aids. No discrepancies were identified relative to either the records or procedure . Physical Barriers - Protected Areas The inspector conducted a physical inspection of the protected area barrie The inspector determined, by observation, that the barriers were installed and maintained as described in the Pla . P_hysical Barriers - Vital Areas The inspector observed that the licensee maintained the physical barriers surrounding the vital areas in conformance with the Pla . Security Sy_ stem Power Supply The inspector reviewed the emergency power supply for the security system and found it to be :n accordance with the Pla . Lighting The inspector observed the lighting within the protected area during the hours of darkness (6:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.) on March 16, 1988. All areas were adequately lighted to allow detection and observation of individuals in the protected area and isolation zones and the illumination levels met the licensee's commitments in the Plan,

.. .

. .-

. .

.

. 4 11. Assessment Aids The inspector observed the operation of the assessment aid system, including during times when artificial lighting was being used (see Paragraph 10), and determined that the system was functioning in i accordance with the commitments in the Plan, 12. Access Control - Personne_1 The inspector observed that all personnel entering the Protected Area were searched for unauthorized material and that personnel access controls and search equipment are adequate and appropriate for their intended purpos . Access Control - Packages The inspector observed that the licensee controlled the flow cf packages and materials into and out of the Protected Area. Packages were searched and materials were appropriately examined by use of equipment using procedures which were adequete for the purpose. The licensee is in conformance with the Plan and regulatory requirement . Detection Aids - Protected Area The inspector observed the protected area perimeter detection aids and determined that they were installed, maintained, and operated as committed to in the Plan, 1 Detection Aids - Vital Areas The inspector reviewed, se'ectively requested tests, and observed guard force response to the vital area detection aids. The detection aids were in conformance with the Plan and the tests verified that the detection aids were functioning properly and that the guard force response time was prompt and adequat . Alarm Statiors The inspector observed the operation of both the central alarm station (CAS) and the secondary alarm station (SAS) and found them to be operating as committed to in the Plan. CAS and SAS operators were interviewed by the inspector and were found to be knowledgeable of their responsibilities and dutie . Communications The inspector observed that all communications capabilities in both the CAS and the SAS were in accordance with the Plan. Also, the inspector reviewed testing records for the various means of communications available to the security force and found them to be as committed to in the Pla , -. -- ______________________.________J

. s

  • .

-

18. Safeguards Contingency Plan Implementation Review The inspector ascertained that the licensee's plans for responding to security threats and other contingencies was as outlined in the NRC-approved security plan, In addition, the inspector reviewed a selected sample of contingency event drills conducted since January 1, 1987. The inspector noted during this review that the operations organization had not participated in any of the drills in the selected sampl The inspector discussed this with the licensee and determined that the operations organization had not participated in any of the approximately 180 drills conducted by the security organization. In each case they are notified of the drill and nf the scenari The inspector stated that the licensee should review the appropriateness of conducting the drills without the operations organization's participation, especially in those drills where the scenarios used would or should involve operations personne . Exit Interview The inspector met with the licensee representatives listed in paragraph 1 at the conclusion of the inspection on March 17, 1988. At the time, the purpose and scope of the inspection were reviewed and the findings were presente At no time during this inspection was written material provided to the licensee by the inspecto F d

, - , , , - . - - , - - - - - -

, _ . , -- - . , . _ . , - . - - . - . . - . -