|
---|
Category:INSPECTION REPORT
MONTHYEARIR 05000213/19990021999-08-20020 August 1999 Insp Rept 50-213/99-02 on 990420-0719.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Decommissioning Operations & Sf Safety Maint & Surveillance,Plant Support & Rediological Controls IR 05000213/19990011999-05-21021 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-213/99-01 on 980119-990419.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Activities in Preparation for Dismantlement & Decommissioning of Facility IR 05000213/19980061999-02-26026 February 1999 Insp Rept 50-213/98-06 on 981103-990118.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Activities in Preparation for Dismantlement & Decommissioning of Facility. Security Program Was Also Inspected IR 05000213/19980051998-12-21021 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/98-05 on 980720-1102.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20155F8511998-10-29029 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/98-04 on 980720-0911.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Preparations, Planning & Implementation of RCS Chemical Decontamination, Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000213/19980031998-08-21021 August 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/98-03 on 980414-0803 & 13.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Sf Safety, Decommissioning Activities & Radiological Controls IR 05000213/19980011998-05-13013 May 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/98-01 on 980113-0413.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Decommissioning Support Activities,Spent Fuel Safety,Plant Support & Radiological Controls & Facility Mgt & Control IR 05000213/19980021998-05-0505 May 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/98-02 on 980316-20 & 25-27.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Control Programs IR 05000213/19970091998-02-17017 February 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/97-09 on 971012-980112.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Decommissioning Operations & Planning & Included Aspects of Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000213/19970121998-01-15015 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/97-12 on 970812-13 & 1006-09.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Status of Rp&C Facilities & Equipment ML20198Q9091998-01-14014 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/97-10 on 971008-1128.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000213/19970111997-12-29029 December 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-11 on 971006-09 & 1103-07.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Programs for Radioactive Liquid Control IR 05000213/19970051997-11-26026 November 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-05 on 970708-1006.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maint Engineering & Plant Support ML20199D4621997-11-0707 November 1997 Corrected Pages for Insp Rept 50-213/97-03 on 970408-0707 & 0805 ML20199D4881997-11-0707 November 1997 Corrected Page for Insp Rept 50-213/97-07 on 970715-30 ML20198N2821997-10-29029 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-08 on 970703,0811-0919.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Applied Radiological Controls Program, Contamination Control Program & Training of Personnel Relative to 49CFR172,subpart H IR 05000213/19970031997-10-0909 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-03 on 970408-0707 & 0805.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000213/19970071997-08-18018 August 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-07 on 970715-30.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Area IR 05000213/19970061997-08-12012 August 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-06 on 970616-0718.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Controls Program at Cyap Station,Haddam,Ct ML20149D6211997-06-13013 June 1997 Mgt Meeting Rept 50-213/97-03 on 970528.Areas Discussed: Actions in Response to Findings Detailed in NRC Insp Repts 50-213/96-12.96-201 & 97-01.Deficiencies Involved Implementation of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000213/19970041997-06-0303 June 1997 Physical Security Insp Rept 50-213/97-04 on 970505-08.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Previously Identified Items,Mgt Control,Pa Detection Aids,Alarm Stations & Communication,Testing,Maint & Compensatory Measures ML20141F8301997-05-0808 May 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-01 on 970106-0407.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000213/19970021997-03-21021 March 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-02 on 970207-07 & 0224-26.Violation Noted.Major Area Inspected:Programs for Radioactive Liquid & Gaseous Effluent Control,Including Organization & Effectiveness of Program Implementation ML20136B4471997-02-25025 February 1997 Summary of Meeting Re Insp 50-213/96-12 on 970205 in King of Prussia,Pa to Discuss Findings Detailed in Insp Rept on 961102.Radiation Program Was Deficient in Several Areas That Resulted in Potential Exposure to Radiation ML20138J6751997-02-0404 February 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/96-13 on 961116-970105.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support ML20133A5031996-12-24024 December 1996 Insp Rept 50-213/96-11 on 960921-1115.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20132G6211996-12-19019 December 1996 Insp Rept 50-213/96-12 on 961102-27.Apparent Violations Being Considered for Escalated Enforcement Action.Major Areas Inspected:Review of Airborne Radioactivity Event That Occurred on 961102 IR 05000213/19960101996-11-0505 November 1996 Insp Rept 50-213/96-10 on 960811-0920.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000213/19960801996-10-30030 October 1996 Insp Rept 50-213/96-80 on 960903-1002.Violation Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Mgt Oversight & Controls ML20129F4701996-10-23023 October 1996 Insp Rept 50/213-96-07 on 960813-16.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance During Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise,Emergency Facility Staffing, Procedure Emplementation & Effectiveness of Mitigation IR 05000213/19940011994-01-24024 January 1994 Insp Rept 50-213/94-01 on 940110-14.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Projected Dose Calculation Capability from Radioactive Liquid & Gaseous Effluent Releases IR 05000213/19930211993-12-30030 December 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/93-21 on 931107-1211.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Technical Support & Plant Support Activities IR 05000213/19930231993-12-17017 December 1993 Insp Repts 50-213/93-23,50-245/93-30,50-336/93-25 & 50-423/93-27 on Stated Date.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Ffd Program,Policies & Procedures,Ffd Organization & Mgt Control,Training,Chemical Testing & FFD Audit IR 05000213/19930191993-11-23023 November 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/93-19 on 931003-1106.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Technical Support & Plant Support Activities IR 05000213/19930161993-11-0404 November 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/93-16 on 930829-1002.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Technical Support & Plant Support Activities IR 05000213/19930181993-10-0707 October 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/93-18 on 930927-30.No Safety Concerns or Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Remp,Including Mgt Controls,Qa Audits,Meteorological Monitoring Program & QC Program for Analytical Measurements IR 05000213/19930151993-10-0101 October 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/93-15 on Stated Dates.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Generic Ltr 89-10 Program & Related Activities ML20057E6661993-09-29029 September 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/93-16 on 930725-0828.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maint,Engineering & Technical Support,Plant Support Activities,Outage Assessment & Emergency Planning Drill IR 05000213/19930121993-08-18018 August 1993 Safety Insp Rept 50-213/93-12 on 930620-0724.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Outage Activities,Event Response,Maint,Engineering & Technical Support & Plant Support Activities IR 05000213/19920231993-02-0101 February 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/92-23 on 921214-18.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Ep Program Changes,Emergency Facilities, Equipment,Instrumentation & Supplies,Ep Organization & Management Control,Training & Independent Reviews/Audits IR 05000213/19920221993-01-21021 January 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/92-22 on 921116-20.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Corrective Actions of Previously Identified Insp Items IR 05000213/19920211993-01-15015 January 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/92-21 on 921115-1212.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Radiological Controls,Maint,Lers & Periodic Repts & Manual Operator Actions During Postulated Station Blackout IR 05000213/19920811993-01-0808 January 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/92-81 on 921005-09 & 29,1112,1210 & 930105 in Region I Ofc.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Generic Ltr 89-10 Program,Including Scope & Administration of Program, Design Basis Reviews & MOV Training IR 05000213/19920241992-12-30030 December 1992 Insp Rept 50-213/92-24 on 921130-1204.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Function of Engineering & Technical Support Reviewed to Evaluate Staffing of Engineering Dept IR 05000213/19920251992-12-22022 December 1992 Insp Rept 50-213/92-25 on 921214-17.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Organization,Training & Assurance of Quality IR 05000213/19920201992-12-15015 December 1992 Insp Rept 50-213/92-20 on 921005-1114.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Radiological Controls,Maint,Surveillance,Licensee self-assessment & Periodic Repts IR 05000213/19900831990-11-0505 November 1990 Insp Repts 50-213/90-83,50-245/90-82,50-336/90-82 & 50-423/90-83 on 900924-28.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Timeliness for Reporting/Operability Determinations IR 05000213/19900821990-10-23023 October 1990 Insp Repts 50-213/90-82,50-245/90-81,50-336/90-81 & 50-423/90-82,on 901001-12.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Occupational Radiation Protection Program Activities During Unit 1 Refueling Outage IR 05000213/19900131990-10-19019 October 1990 Safety Insp Rept 50-213/90-13 on 900801-0911.Good Radiological Controls Performance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Startup Following 1989/1990 Refueling Outage,Reactor Trips on 900813 & 0903 & Safeguards Problems IR 05000213/19900181990-10-10010 October 1990 Insp Rept 50-213/90-18 on 900926.No Violations Noted 1999-08-20
[Table view] Category:NRC-GENERATED
MONTHYEARIR 05000213/19990021999-08-20020 August 1999 Insp Rept 50-213/99-02 on 990420-0719.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Decommissioning Operations & Sf Safety Maint & Surveillance,Plant Support & Rediological Controls IR 05000213/19990011999-05-21021 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-213/99-01 on 980119-990419.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Activities in Preparation for Dismantlement & Decommissioning of Facility IR 05000213/19980061999-02-26026 February 1999 Insp Rept 50-213/98-06 on 981103-990118.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Activities in Preparation for Dismantlement & Decommissioning of Facility. Security Program Was Also Inspected IR 05000213/19980051998-12-21021 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/98-05 on 980720-1102.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20155F8511998-10-29029 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/98-04 on 980720-0911.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Preparations, Planning & Implementation of RCS Chemical Decontamination, Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000213/19980031998-08-21021 August 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/98-03 on 980414-0803 & 13.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Sf Safety, Decommissioning Activities & Radiological Controls IR 05000213/19980011998-05-13013 May 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/98-01 on 980113-0413.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Decommissioning Support Activities,Spent Fuel Safety,Plant Support & Radiological Controls & Facility Mgt & Control IR 05000213/19980021998-05-0505 May 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/98-02 on 980316-20 & 25-27.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Control Programs IR 05000213/19970091998-02-17017 February 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/97-09 on 971012-980112.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Decommissioning Operations & Planning & Included Aspects of Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000213/19970121998-01-15015 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/97-12 on 970812-13 & 1006-09.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Status of Rp&C Facilities & Equipment ML20198Q9091998-01-14014 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/97-10 on 971008-1128.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000213/19970111997-12-29029 December 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-11 on 971006-09 & 1103-07.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Programs for Radioactive Liquid Control IR 05000213/19970051997-11-26026 November 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-05 on 970708-1006.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maint Engineering & Plant Support ML20199D4621997-11-0707 November 1997 Corrected Pages for Insp Rept 50-213/97-03 on 970408-0707 & 0805 ML20199D4881997-11-0707 November 1997 Corrected Page for Insp Rept 50-213/97-07 on 970715-30 ML20198N2821997-10-29029 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-08 on 970703,0811-0919.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Applied Radiological Controls Program, Contamination Control Program & Training of Personnel Relative to 49CFR172,subpart H IR 05000213/19970031997-10-0909 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-03 on 970408-0707 & 0805.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000213/19970071997-08-18018 August 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-07 on 970715-30.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Area IR 05000213/19970061997-08-12012 August 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-06 on 970616-0718.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Controls Program at Cyap Station,Haddam,Ct ML20149D6211997-06-13013 June 1997 Mgt Meeting Rept 50-213/97-03 on 970528.Areas Discussed: Actions in Response to Findings Detailed in NRC Insp Repts 50-213/96-12.96-201 & 97-01.Deficiencies Involved Implementation of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000213/19970041997-06-0303 June 1997 Physical Security Insp Rept 50-213/97-04 on 970505-08.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Previously Identified Items,Mgt Control,Pa Detection Aids,Alarm Stations & Communication,Testing,Maint & Compensatory Measures ML20141F8301997-05-0808 May 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-01 on 970106-0407.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000213/19970021997-03-21021 March 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-02 on 970207-07 & 0224-26.Violation Noted.Major Area Inspected:Programs for Radioactive Liquid & Gaseous Effluent Control,Including Organization & Effectiveness of Program Implementation ML20136B4471997-02-25025 February 1997 Summary of Meeting Re Insp 50-213/96-12 on 970205 in King of Prussia,Pa to Discuss Findings Detailed in Insp Rept on 961102.Radiation Program Was Deficient in Several Areas That Resulted in Potential Exposure to Radiation ML20138J6751997-02-0404 February 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/96-13 on 961116-970105.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support ML20133A5031996-12-24024 December 1996 Insp Rept 50-213/96-11 on 960921-1115.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20132G6211996-12-19019 December 1996 Insp Rept 50-213/96-12 on 961102-27.Apparent Violations Being Considered for Escalated Enforcement Action.Major Areas Inspected:Review of Airborne Radioactivity Event That Occurred on 961102 IR 05000213/19960101996-11-0505 November 1996 Insp Rept 50-213/96-10 on 960811-0920.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000213/19960801996-10-30030 October 1996 Insp Rept 50-213/96-80 on 960903-1002.Violation Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Mgt Oversight & Controls ML20129F4701996-10-23023 October 1996 Insp Rept 50/213-96-07 on 960813-16.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance During Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise,Emergency Facility Staffing, Procedure Emplementation & Effectiveness of Mitigation IR 05000213/19940011994-01-24024 January 1994 Insp Rept 50-213/94-01 on 940110-14.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Projected Dose Calculation Capability from Radioactive Liquid & Gaseous Effluent Releases IR 05000213/19930211993-12-30030 December 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/93-21 on 931107-1211.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Technical Support & Plant Support Activities IR 05000213/19930231993-12-17017 December 1993 Insp Repts 50-213/93-23,50-245/93-30,50-336/93-25 & 50-423/93-27 on Stated Date.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Ffd Program,Policies & Procedures,Ffd Organization & Mgt Control,Training,Chemical Testing & FFD Audit IR 05000213/19930191993-11-23023 November 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/93-19 on 931003-1106.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Technical Support & Plant Support Activities IR 05000213/19930161993-11-0404 November 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/93-16 on 930829-1002.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Technical Support & Plant Support Activities IR 05000213/19930181993-10-0707 October 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/93-18 on 930927-30.No Safety Concerns or Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Remp,Including Mgt Controls,Qa Audits,Meteorological Monitoring Program & QC Program for Analytical Measurements IR 05000213/19930151993-10-0101 October 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/93-15 on Stated Dates.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Generic Ltr 89-10 Program & Related Activities ML20057E6661993-09-29029 September 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/93-16 on 930725-0828.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maint,Engineering & Technical Support,Plant Support Activities,Outage Assessment & Emergency Planning Drill IR 05000213/19930121993-08-18018 August 1993 Safety Insp Rept 50-213/93-12 on 930620-0724.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Outage Activities,Event Response,Maint,Engineering & Technical Support & Plant Support Activities IR 05000213/19920231993-02-0101 February 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/92-23 on 921214-18.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Ep Program Changes,Emergency Facilities, Equipment,Instrumentation & Supplies,Ep Organization & Management Control,Training & Independent Reviews/Audits IR 05000213/19920221993-01-21021 January 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/92-22 on 921116-20.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Corrective Actions of Previously Identified Insp Items IR 05000213/19920211993-01-15015 January 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/92-21 on 921115-1212.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Radiological Controls,Maint,Lers & Periodic Repts & Manual Operator Actions During Postulated Station Blackout IR 05000213/19920811993-01-0808 January 1993 Insp Rept 50-213/92-81 on 921005-09 & 29,1112,1210 & 930105 in Region I Ofc.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Generic Ltr 89-10 Program,Including Scope & Administration of Program, Design Basis Reviews & MOV Training IR 05000213/19920241992-12-30030 December 1992 Insp Rept 50-213/92-24 on 921130-1204.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Function of Engineering & Technical Support Reviewed to Evaluate Staffing of Engineering Dept IR 05000213/19920251992-12-22022 December 1992 Insp Rept 50-213/92-25 on 921214-17.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Organization,Training & Assurance of Quality IR 05000213/19920201992-12-15015 December 1992 Insp Rept 50-213/92-20 on 921005-1114.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Radiological Controls,Maint,Surveillance,Licensee self-assessment & Periodic Repts IR 05000213/19900831990-11-0505 November 1990 Insp Repts 50-213/90-83,50-245/90-82,50-336/90-82 & 50-423/90-83 on 900924-28.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Timeliness for Reporting/Operability Determinations IR 05000213/19900821990-10-23023 October 1990 Insp Repts 50-213/90-82,50-245/90-81,50-336/90-81 & 50-423/90-82,on 901001-12.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Occupational Radiation Protection Program Activities During Unit 1 Refueling Outage IR 05000213/19900131990-10-19019 October 1990 Safety Insp Rept 50-213/90-13 on 900801-0911.Good Radiological Controls Performance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Startup Following 1989/1990 Refueling Outage,Reactor Trips on 900813 & 0903 & Safeguards Problems IR 05000213/19900181990-10-10010 October 1990 Insp Rept 50-213/90-18 on 900926.No Violations Noted 1999-08-20
[Table view] Category:TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
MONTHYEARPNO-I-99-039, on 990831,Haddam Neck Plant CR Was Notified by Transportation Contractor,Hittman Transportation Svcs,That Driver of Truck,Left Plant Earlier in Day Noticed Water Leakage from from sea-land Container He Was Transporting1999-09-0101 September 1999 PNO-I-99-039:on 990831,Haddam Neck Plant CR Was Notified by Transportation Contractor,Hittman Transportation Svcs,That Driver of Truck,Left Plant Earlier in Day Noticed Water Leakage from from sea-land Container He Was Transporting IR 05000213/19990021999-08-20020 August 1999 Insp Rept 50-213/99-02 on 990420-0719.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Decommissioning Operations & Sf Safety Maint & Surveillance,Plant Support & Rediological Controls IR 05000213/19990011999-05-21021 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-213/99-01 on 980119-990419.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Activities in Preparation for Dismantlement & Decommissioning of Facility ML20206R7391999-05-12012 May 1999 Notice of Violation from Investigation on 970616-0718. Violations Noted:On 961209 & 10,J Foley Deliberately Caused Util to Be in Violation of 10CFR50.9 & TS 6.11 & in June 1997 Provided Inaccurate Info to NRC Inspector ML20206R7141999-05-12012 May 1999 Notice of Violation from Investigation on 970314-0722. Violation Noted:M Thomas Engaged in Deliberate Misconduct on 970227,that But for Detection,Would Have Caused Licensee to Be in Violation of 10CFR20.1802 ML20205J8031999-04-0505 April 1999 Notice of Violation from Insp on 961102-27.Violation Noted:Licensee Failed to Adequately Instruct Workers & Failed to Perform Adequate Radiological Surveys in Reactor Cavity & Fuel Transfer Cavity ML20206B3801999-03-29029 March 1999 EN-99-015:informs Commission That Staff Intends to Exercise Discretion Pursuant to Section VII.B.6 of Enforcement Policy & Not Propose Civil Penalty for Severity Level III Problem That Occurred in Nov 1996,prior to Licensee Decision IR 05000213/19980061999-02-26026 February 1999 Insp Rept 50-213/98-06 on 981103-990118.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Activities in Preparation for Dismantlement & Decommissioning of Facility. Security Program Was Also Inspected ML20207B7041999-02-26026 February 1999 Notice of Violation from Insp on 981103-990118.Violations Noted:Two Different Locked High Radiation Area Doors in Containment Builiding Found Unlocked & Unattended IR 05000213/19980051998-12-21021 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/98-05 on 980720-1102.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20155F8511998-10-29029 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/98-04 on 980720-0911.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Licensee Preparations, Planning & Implementation of RCS Chemical Decontamination, Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000213/19980031998-08-21021 August 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/98-03 on 980414-0803 & 13.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Sf Safety, Decommissioning Activities & Radiological Controls ML20237D4071998-08-21021 August 1998 Notice of Violations from Insp on 980414-0803 & 13. Violations Noted:Licensee Failed to Declare Unusual Event Re 980620 Release of About 800 Gallons of Water Containing Approx 2200 Uci Radioactivity from a Waste Test Tank PNO-I-98-033, on 980728,licensee Identified Leak of Approximately 1,000 Gallons of Demineralized Water & Chemical Agents Used for Decontamination of Plant Sys.Region I Radiation Specialist Will Be Onsite to Review Licensee1998-07-28028 July 1998 PNO-I-98-033:on 980728,licensee Identified Leak of Approximately 1,000 Gallons of Demineralized Water & Chemical Agents Used for Decontamination of Plant Sys.Region I Radiation Specialist Will Be Onsite to Review Licensee IR 05000213/19980011998-05-13013 May 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/98-01 on 980113-0413.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Decommissioning Support Activities,Spent Fuel Safety,Plant Support & Radiological Controls & Facility Mgt & Control IR 05000213/19980021998-05-0505 May 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/98-02 on 980316-20 & 25-27.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Control Programs IR 05000213/19970091998-02-17017 February 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/97-09 on 971012-980112.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Decommissioning Operations & Planning & Included Aspects of Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20203E6771998-02-17017 February 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 971012-980112.Violation Noted:Licensee Did Not Provide for Verifying or Checking Adequacy of Design for Listed Sys & Components IR 05000213/19970121998-01-15015 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/97-12 on 970812-13 & 1006-09.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Status of Rp&C Facilities & Equipment ML20198Q9091998-01-14014 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-213/97-10 on 971008-1128.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000213/19970111997-12-29029 December 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-11 on 971006-09 & 1103-07.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Programs for Radioactive Liquid Control PNO-I-97-073A, on 971210,update of Offsite Surveys for Contaminated Blocks Made.Total of 114 Blocks Out of 3032 Indicated Radioactive Contamination at Greater than Two Times Background Levels.Licensee Plans to Return to Sites1997-12-11011 December 1997 PNO-I-97-073A:on 971210,update of Offsite Surveys for Contaminated Blocks Made.Total of 114 Blocks Out of 3032 Indicated Radioactive Contamination at Greater than Two Times Background Levels.Licensee Plans to Return to Sites PNO-I-97-074, on 971203,licensee Announced Senior Mgt Restructuring,Which Included Naming New Chairman,President, Chief Executive Officer,Chief Financial Officer & Promotion of Director of Site Operations1997-12-0404 December 1997 PNO-I-97-074:on 971203,licensee Announced Senior Mgt Restructuring,Which Included Naming New Chairman,President, Chief Executive Officer,Chief Financial Officer & Promotion of Director of Site Operations PNO-I-97-073, survey Identified Former Cask Wash Down Area Needing Further Characterization & Remediation within Licensee Control Area.Concrete Blocks Used for Temporary Shield Wall Was Used by 15 Households as of 9711301997-12-0101 December 1997 PNO-I-97-073:survey Identified Former Cask Wash Down Area Needing Further Characterization & Remediation within Licensee Control Area.Concrete Blocks Used for Temporary Shield Wall Was Used by 15 Households as of 971130 IR 05000213/19970051997-11-26026 November 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-05 on 970708-1006.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maint Engineering & Plant Support ML20199D4881997-11-0707 November 1997 Corrected Page for Insp Rept 50-213/97-07 on 970715-30 ML20199D4621997-11-0707 November 1997 Corrected Pages for Insp Rept 50-213/97-03 on 970408-0707 & 0805 ML20198N2761997-10-29029 October 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970703,0811-0919.Violation Noted:On 950222,individual Working on Radiation Work Permit (RWP) 1950603,received Facial Contamination & Not Sent to Be whole-body-counted ML20198N2821997-10-29029 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-08 on 970703,0811-0919.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Applied Radiological Controls Program, Contamination Control Program & Training of Personnel Relative to 49CFR172,subpart H IR 05000213/19970031997-10-0909 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-03 on 970408-0707 & 0805.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support ML20217J3981997-10-0909 October 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970408-0805.Violations Noted:From 960814-970311,licensee Did Not Assure That Significant Condition Adverse to Quality Was Promptly Corrected ML20199B5731997-10-0202 October 1997 EN-97-095:on 971009,staff Intends to Issue Notice of Violation for Two Severity Level III Violations of App B, Criterion Xvi, Corrective Actions. Violations Involved Discovery of Old Plant Design Discrepancy in SWS IR 05000213/19970071997-08-18018 August 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-07 on 970715-30.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Area ML20210P0101997-08-12012 August 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970616-0718.Violation noted:post-dive Diver Tritium Bioassay Sample for 961108 Dive Was Not Shipped as Expeditiously as Possible for Analysis & No Preservative Was Added IR 05000213/19970061997-08-12012 August 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-06 on 970616-0718.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Controls Program at Cyap Station,Haddam,Ct PNO-I-97-049, on 970807,inadvertent Actuation of Halon Sys Occurred Affecting CR & Adjacent Central Alarm Station. Personnel Took Photographs of Panel of Halon Actuation Panel,Prior to Actuation.Root Cause of Actuation Evaluated1997-08-0808 August 1997 PNO-I-97-049:on 970807,inadvertent Actuation of Halon Sys Occurred Affecting CR & Adjacent Central Alarm Station. Personnel Took Photographs of Panel of Halon Actuation Panel,Prior to Actuation.Root Cause of Actuation Evaluated ML20149D6211997-06-13013 June 1997 Mgt Meeting Rept 50-213/97-03 on 970528.Areas Discussed: Actions in Response to Findings Detailed in NRC Insp Repts 50-213/96-12.96-201 & 97-01.Deficiencies Involved Implementation of Radiation Protection Program IR 05000213/19970041997-06-0303 June 1997 Physical Security Insp Rept 50-213/97-04 on 970505-08.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Previously Identified Items,Mgt Control,Pa Detection Aids,Alarm Stations & Communication,Testing,Maint & Compensatory Measures ML20140G4491997-05-12012 May 1997 EN-97-035:on 970512,notice of Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $650,000 Issued to Licensee.Action Based on Three Severity Level II Problems Consisting of Multiple Individual Violations ML20141D2621997-05-12012 May 1997 Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $650,000.Violation Noted:Licensee Did Not Assure That Applicable Regulatory Requirements & Design Basis Were Correctly Translated Into Specifications ML20141F8181997-05-0808 May 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 970106-0407.Violation Noted:No RCS Chemistry Samples Were Taken from 961115-970206 ML20141F8301997-05-0808 May 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-01 on 970106-0407.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Operations,Engineering,Maint & Plant Support IR 05000213/19970021997-03-21021 March 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/97-02 on 970207-07 & 0224-26.Violation Noted.Major Area Inspected:Programs for Radioactive Liquid & Gaseous Effluent Control,Including Organization & Effectiveness of Program Implementation PNO-I-97-014, on 970227,retrieval of Contaminated Matl at Vendor Facility Made.Licensee Dispatched Survey Team, Consisting of HP Supervisor,Hp Technician & Radioactive Matl Handler to Vendor Facility to Survey & Retrieve Matl1997-02-28028 February 1997 PNO-I-97-014:on 970227,retrieval of Contaminated Matl at Vendor Facility Made.Licensee Dispatched Survey Team, Consisting of HP Supervisor,Hp Technician & Radioactive Matl Handler to Vendor Facility to Survey & Retrieve Matl ML20136B4471997-02-25025 February 1997 Summary of Meeting Re Insp 50-213/96-12 on 970205 in King of Prussia,Pa to Discuss Findings Detailed in Insp Rept on 961102.Radiation Program Was Deficient in Several Areas That Resulted in Potential Exposure to Radiation ML20138J6751997-02-0404 February 1997 Insp Rept 50-213/96-13 on 961116-970105.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support ML20138J6721997-02-0404 February 1997 Notice of Violation from Insp on 961116-970105.Violation Noted:On 961127,during Preparations to Test EG2B After Jacking Engine,Operator Failed to Remove Crank Over Tool Per Step 6.2.10 Prior to Running Diesel for One Hour Test ML20133A4911996-12-24024 December 1996 Notice of Violation from Insp on 960921-1115.Violation Noted:On 960924,B Residual Heat Removal Pump Failed Due to Inherent Manufacturing Defects & Marginal Design Tolerance ML20133A5031996-12-24024 December 1996 Insp Rept 50-213/96-11 on 960921-1115.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20132G6211996-12-19019 December 1996 Insp Rept 50-213/96-12 on 961102-27.Apparent Violations Being Considered for Escalated Enforcement Action.Major Areas Inspected:Review of Airborne Radioactivity Event That Occurred on 961102 1999-09-01
[Table view] |
Text
.-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
.
U. S. Nucieur Regulatory Conunission Region 1 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS INSPECTION REPORT License / Docket / Report: DPR-61/50-213/92-23 Licensec: Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company P.O. Box 270 11artford, Connecticut 06101-0270
'
Pacility: IInddam Neck Plant IInddam, Connecticut Dates: December 14 18, 1992 Inspectors: :] ko-J. Lusher, Emergency Preparedness Specialist
_- 02/m/93 date J. Laughlin, Emergency Preparedness Specialist O. Bryan, NRC Consultant (Comex)
Approved: b C., ._,
QlIh3 E. McCabe, Chief. Emergency Preparedness date Section, Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards AREAS INSPECTED Emergency preparedness (EP) program changes; emergency facilities, equipment, instrumentation, and supplies; EP organization and management control; training; and independent reviews / audit RESULTS
>
, Overall, the emergency preparedness (EP) program was acceptably implemented. Strengths were evident in event classification and reporting during walk-through drills, and in- the i licensee's emergency response call-in drill program. An apparent violation was identified for lack of annual Emergency Action Level training for Technical Support Managers. Also, adequacy of EP audit review / distribution and currency of the Emergency Plan were identified
as unresolved item S0 930203 PDR G
ADOCK 05000213 PDR
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- __ _ _ ___ - - _ __ - .
-- __-___-_-___ - - -
.
.
DETAILS Persons Contacted The following licensee persomiel attended the December 18,1992 exit meetir: E. Annino, Staff Assistant M. Emy, Supervisor, Operator Training Connecticut Yankee P. Bauchan, Emergency Preparedness Technician G. Bouchard, Unit I;irector W. Buck, Irad Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, Haddam Neck
,
L. Delvca, Senior Emergency Preparedness Coordinator J, Falier, Nuclear Tminer
- W. Gates, Radiation Protection Supervisor, Operations 3 W. Herwig, Connecticut Yankee Administration S. Hodge, Supervisor, General Nuclear Training L. Kemp, Emergency Preparedners (Sonalysts)
J. LaPlantney, Operations Manager, Connecticut Yankee C. Libby, Supervisor, Assessment Services P. Lucky, Senior Nuclear Trainer E. Maclean, Nuclear Trainer W. McCance,12ad Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, Millstone R. Rogers, Director, Emergency Preparedness Department, Northeast Utilities W. Romberg, Vice President Nuclear Operations A. Saunders, Assessment Services Auditor The inspectors also interviewed and observed other licensee personne!. Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedures The inspectors reviewed the Emergency Plan and Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures (EPIPs). There were 14 recently approved procedure changes. Eighteen morc were in review in preparation for Plant Operating Review Committee (PORC) approval. These changes reflected organizational changes, previous NRC inspection items and drill / exercise upgrade This inspection identified the following discrepancies between facility activities and the Emergency Plan and EPIP * On May 29,1992, the Training Program Control Committee (TPCC: had concluded that EAL Training Module G007 was no longer required for Technical Support Center (TSC)
Managers, and that training was deleted. That violated the requirement for such training in the Emergency Plan approved by the Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC) and by the NRC (VIO 50-213/92-23-01). (See Report Detail 5.0.)
.
_ ____ _ ____ - _ - _
.
i
- Section 3 of the Emergency Plan established the training requirements foi the Emergency Response Organization (ERO). Nuclear Training Mam.al (NTM) 3.212, Revision 3d, 8/15/91, defined the training to be conducted. The training matrices in Section 8 of the plan and NTM 3.212 differed. For example, Directors of Station Emergency Operations and the senior on shift operators were not required by the emergency plan to receive
" Emergency Action Level (EAL) Table Training," Module G007, which was being taught and which appeared to lx: appropriate training for these emergency response management positions. (See Report Detail 5.0.)
- The facility and equipment irwentory check lists in use were not as indicated in the ph No significant inadequacy was noted in the check lists in use (See Report Detail 3.0); this discrepancy was identified as a minor weakness in attention to detai ,
- During review of the EAL tables, it was noted that the Emergency Plan tables were Revision 22 and that the " Emergency Assessment" EPIP 1.5-1 tables were Revision 2 This discrepancy will be further revievred for safety significance (URI 50-213/92-23-02)
(See Report Detail 5.0).
Overall, this program area was found to be acceptable, s Emergency Facilities, Equipment, Instrumentation and Supplie The inspector toured the Control Room, the Technical Support Center, the Opemtions Support Center (OSC), the OSC m-plant staging area, and the Emergency Operations Center, Tiiese facilities were well-maintained, and had all required emergency equipment and up-todite pmcedures. Equipment surveillances were being performed at the required frequencies, and instmments were calibrated as required. There were minor discrepancies betwu inventory lists found in the Emergency Plan and ones in the facilities, but these did not affect response capability significantly. The licensee was aware of this situation and was updating the Emergency Plan to correct i The inspector viewed the communications equipment in the < aergency response facilities, including telephones, radios, telecopier machines, and television monitors for viewing Control Room panels. All equipment identified in procedures was present. The licensee also had spare telephones for fast replacement of inoperable one Records from thme emergency call-in drills were reviewed. On<all personnel were required to respond to radio-pager activation, or a qualified relief was obtained. Records of response were maintained b, Emergency Response Organization position and time of call-in. These drills were conducted approximately quarterly and wem well-documented. The call-in drill res'ilts supported the conclusion that sufficient ERO personnel were available to adequately staff an emergency response. The on-site Lead Senior Nuclear Emergency Prepamdness Coordinator (EPC) sent a memo to the Station Vice President documenting the outcome of each dril l l
- _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _
- . .
.
.
Personnel who failed to respond were counselled by the Nuclear Senices Director, These drills and the resolution of drill discrepancies were assessed as a program strengt The inspector toured the new OSC staging area located in a low dose area outside the Health Physics Supervisor's of0cc in the radiologically controlled area in the lower level switchgear
'
building. This location allowed in-plant staging for maintenance team reassignment without returning to the Emergency Operations Facility. The area had a telephone, telecopier, and status board for Maintenance Team Leader communications with the OSC Manager. This area was '
Grst utilized during the November 5,1992 station drill. At that time, only one telephone line was provided, and the telephone and telecopier could not be used simultaneously. Two more telephone lines were installed to correct that problem. The effectiveness of this staging area will be reviewed during the Matrh 1993 panial-participation exercis The inspector viewed the new 10-meter, oack-up meteorological mast, which was completed in the summer of 1992. That mast added an additional source of wind speed and direction to back up the Doppler Acoustic Sounder, which becomes ineffective during high winds or heavy precipitation. Also the anemometer vanes on all meteorological towers were replaced with vanes with heavy duty cups to p event loss during hurricane velocity winds, which I'ad occurred at Millstone during Hurricane Bob in 199 This program area was assessed as being effectively implemente .0 Organization and Management Control l
The inspectors reviewed EP staffing and noted that substantive management changes have taken place. One change had the on-site L.ead Senior Emergency Planning Coordinator, Connecticut Yankee, report to the Director, Emergency Preg'aredness, Northeast Utilities Service Company (NUSCO), with indirect reporting to the on-site Station Services Director.
l Since March 1992, N O has been reorganizing the EP Department. The Northeast Utilities
!
EP organization was modified to include the Director of NUSCO Emergency Preparedness, the NUSCO EP Technical Programs staff of nine, the NUSCO off-site EP Program staff of eleven, the Haddam Neck on-site EP staff of five, and the Millstone Point on-site EP staff of six. The new total EP staffing of 35 permanent and contractor personnel replaced the previous staffing of about nine. The licensee stated that improved capability to interface with FEhM and with
!
State and local EP organizations as a major factor in the reorganizatio Under the new organization, on-site EP staff functions included trsponsibility for Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure (EPIP) maintenance, EP surveillances, the on-call program, emergency respense facility maintenance, interfacing with the NRC, coordinating on-site drills / exercises, and conducting monthly / quarterly security and communication EP drills. EP Technical Programs tasks included drill / exercise scenario development, conducting ;
drills / exercises (ir, eluding medical exercises), maintaNing the Corporate Organization Nuclear >
l
. - , .
_
,
l
.
.
Incident (CONI) procedure manual, maintaining key technical procedures {e.g. Emergency Action Levels (EALs), dose assessment, etc.},10 CFR 50.54(q) effectiveness evaluations; maintaining the Off-Site Facilities Infonnation System (OFIS), the Emergency Response Data System (ERDS), and the Emergency Notification and Response System (ENRS); maintaining the Berlin Emergency Operations Center (EOC); and developing technical programs. The off-site EP organization was tasked with maintaining State / local plans, the siten/radiopager program, EP data bases, telephone books, and hospital / nursing home plans, with off-site training, with interfacing with FEMA, and with coordinating off-site drills / exercise The Emergency Response Organization (ERO) was found to be adequately described in the emergency plan. All ERO positions were staffed through qualification of three or four individuals in each positio The inspectors concluded that the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) organization included sufficient radiological controls staff members to support the Director of Site Emergency Operations (DSEO) in making accident mit!gation and classification decisions based upon radiological conditions. However, the DSEO staff in the EOF was also required to provide inputs to event classification and mitigation decisions based upon plant conditions, but there was no requistment for any operations personnel or for current or previously licensed personnel in the EOF organization. This condition was referred to the licensee for consideratio There was no requirement that the Technical Support Center (TSC) staff include anyone with an operations background. In practice, TSC staffing has included such individuals. It was nonetheless possible that the TSC could be activated by a staff with no Emergency Operating Procedure (EOP) experience or training. That could lead to a weakness in TSC ability to know when the control room staff should be departing fmm the EOPs under severe accident conditions. This matter was identified to the licensee for consideratio Overall, this program area was assessed as being effectively implemente .0 Training Emergency response training program requirements were established in Section 8 of the Emergency Plan (E-Plan), Revision 22, and amplified in the Nuclear Training Department's Emergency Plan Training Program Implementing Procedure, NTM-3.212, Revision 3. Training of off site suppon groups was assigned to the corpc, rate staf The inspectors reviewed EP training lesson plans, examinations, attendance records, Emergency Response Organization (ERO) qualification records, station on-call ERO watch lists, required drill schedules and accomplishment reports, deficiency tracking records, selected EPIPs, Sections 4 and 8 of the Emergency Plan, and NTM-3.212. Walk-throughs were conducted with tlues operating crews in the plant-specific simulator. Each walk-through was scheduled for four hours, involved two accident scenarios, and was used to assess the adequacy of Emergency Plan i
_ - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - _ ~
. - - _ --. --- - .. . .
- -
.
.
training and of the supporting procedures. The inspectors found that all walk-through scenario classifications of events were correct and timely (including General Emergency classifications by State of Connecticut posture code), and that notifications were accomplished properl Inspector review of 62 names selected from the ERO on-calllist found that the training records correctly reflected each individual's qualification for the ERO positions assigned. This 100%
correct sample reflected a stangth in EP training program administration. However, inspector review of ERO on-call records for a three-month period noted that one individual was not eligible for ERO on-call assignment because of tmining failure. That individual was nonetheless posted to the on-call list as a Radiological Monitoring Team Leader (RMTL) from 9/21/92 to 9/27/92. This was assessed as a case of inattention to detail.
A new ERO position of Health Physics Occupational Radiation Exposure (HELPORE) System Operator was established by EPIP 1.5-52 on October 24, 199 That position was not incorpomted in E-Plan Revision 22 promulgated on June 20,1992, eight months later. This was assessed as a case of inattention to detai The E-Plan Containment Barrier Failure Table on a Section 4 pullout page incorrectly identified a potential loss of Containment Critical Safety Function Status Tree (CSFST) path as orange [a potential hazard to public safety]. As shown (correctly) in the classification EPIP, that potential loss of Containment was a red [ imminent hazard to public safety) Containment CSFST pat The Technical Specifications, in Section 6.5.1.6-j of Chapter 6, specify that the Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedures and changes thereto receive PORC (Plant Operations Review Committee) safety review. NTM-3.211, a non-PORC-reviewed supporting procedure that implemented E-Plan training, was changed on May 29, 1992, deleting requirements for the Technical Support Manager to receive Training Module G007, Emergency Action Level Training. ~ 10 CFR 50.54(q) requin:s nuclear power reactor licensees to follow and maintain in effect emergency plans which meet the requirements in 10 O 'R 50 Appendix E. 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section F.a, requires initial training and periodic retraining of emergency directors and/or coonlinators of the plant emergency organization. The Haddam Neck Emergency Plan, Revision 22, July 27,1992, specifies, m Figure 8-1 and Section 8.1.1, that Technical Support Managers receive, annually (1 year i 3 months), Training Module G007, Emergency Action Level Training. As of December 18, 1992, personnel qualified as Technical Support Center Managers had last received Training Module G007 training in June 1991, about 18. months previously. This was classified as an apparent violation. (92-23-01)
Licensee response to student coursc critiques was noted to be the exception rather than the rul Although a 100% response did not appear to be necessary, the inspector identified increased feedback to students as an item for licensee considention for improving student input and the E-plan tmining proces Several students had refused to list their social security numbers (SSNs) on training attendance g records. The records computer input was based upon social security numbers, and the records l
- - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
--____ _ _ __ __
,
- . . -
.
were degraded by the time delays caused by absence of social security numbers. Specifically, three instances of training accomplished in March of 1992 but not yet posted to the computer Glcs by December 1992 were noted. This indicated a need to provide an altemate means of identifying the student The TSC staff received severe accident familiarization training. However, EAL (Emergency Action Ixvel) training was not required for Directors of Station Emergency Operations (DSEOs)
and for the licensed senior reactor operators who could be required to classify a fast-breaking emergency. Such training may be appropriate for these individuals and for other cognizant or supporting emergency msponse facility managers and staff. This matter was identified to the licensee for consideration, g
Overall, acceptable program implementation was identified in this area.
5 Independent Reviews The 1991 Emergency Preparedness (EP) Program Review was conducted from September 1991 m February 1992 under Corporate Organization for Nuclear Incidents (CONI) Procedure 11.01, Revision 11, October 10, 199 That directive assigned procedure implementation responsibility to the Supervisor, Radiological Protection Section (RPS).
The 1991 review identified inadequate training of Pmduction Operations Services Laboratory !
d environmental teams as a problem. Correction was achieved by December 18',1991, indicating an effective corrective action functio The 1991 review used a checklist as an aid to evaluate whether the requirements of 10CFR50.54(t) were being met. No checklist inadequacies were identined. However, the Review Report documented satisfactory completion of items based on existence of procedares written to satisfy requirements, or on interviews with personnel responsible for their completio No observation or review of procedure implementation was reporte CFR50.54(t) also requires a review of the EP program at least every 12 months by persons who have no direct responsibility for implementation of the program. The 1991 licensee review was completed by personnel from the Radiological Protection Section and the Radiological
'
Engineering Section. Both of these individuals reported directly to the Supervisor, Radiological Assessment Branch (RAB), who was responsible for EP. Thus, the review's independence was questionable because the myiewers reported directly to the Supervisor, RAB. This. issue was identified as Unresolved in Inspection Report 50-213/91-09 (URI 91-09-02). However, the MarchJuly,1992 Emergency Plan and 10CFR50.54(t) . Program Audit was conducted under the direction of the Quality Services Depar' ment. This audit was an improvement over the 1991 review, both in content and auditor independence. Auditors used the checklist as a guide and documented findings by writing assessments for each area evaluated. The audit identified five Unresolved Items and one Recommendation, none of which required responses according to
)
'
.
_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ . _
-- _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ -
.
1
.
licensee procedures (only findings did), though auditors requested and received responses for two of the Unresolved Items. Unresolved item 91-10-02 is therefore close CFR50.54(t) requires each nuclear power reactor licensee to include, in the emergen:y preparedness program reviews required eveg 12 months, an evaluation of the adequacy of interfaces with State and local governments and of licensee drills, exarcises, capabilities, and procedure The licensee's March 4uly,1992 Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Plant emergency review did not include an evaluation of the adequacy of interfaces with State and local governments. It also did not include an evaluation of the licensee's drills and exercises:
the medical drill on April 1,1992 was the only drill evaluated, and no assessment was made of the drill program as a whole. An associated issue was identified as a non-cited violation in Inspection Report 50-213/91-09 (91-09-01): the 10 CFR 50.54(t) requirement that the part of the review involving the evaluation for adequacy of ir.terface with State and local governments shall be made available to the appropriate State and INal governments was not accomplished for the September 1991-Febmary 1992 emergency preparedness program revie Proper accomplishment and distribution of the required emergency preparedness program review for the March 1992-February 1993 is unresolved (URI 50-213/92-23-03) pending review of the j licensee's audit program as accomplished for the 12-month period ending in February 1993. The licensee expressed the intention of correcting this matter by December 31,199 The inspector reviewed the EP drill and exercise program. In 1992, the licensee conducted three station mini-drills, a dress rehearsal, and the annual exercise. After each drill, the Lead Senior Nuclear Emergency Prepandness Coordinator (EPC) sent a summary of drill comments to the Nuclear Services Director, and prepared drill reports which were signed by the Nuclear Services Director and Station Vice President. The Lead Senior EPC tracked significant items for improvement in the Emergency Plan Commitment Follow List (EPCFL).
The inspector reviewed the latest EPCFL Items wem tracked by source, corrective action required, status, and due date, and were assigned to specific persons for completion. Six items were open, three of which were past their due date. These three concerned procedure changes that wem awaiting approval of the Pp.nt Operations Review Committee. Overall, The EPCFL was assessed as effective in assuring ppropriate corrective actions were take Records of three actual events were kviewed. These were all Unusual Events CJEs). One was caused by an instrumentation malfudtion resulting in incorrect rod position indication. Two were for gaseous radioactive releases. One of the radioactive releases was declared prematurely, did not require a UE declaration, and was later withdrawn. Overall, event classification and reporting were appropriate and conservativ .0 Exit Meeting
.
At the end of the inspection, an exit meeting was held to ciscuss the inspection scope and I
findings with the licensee personnel listed in Report Detail i l
l
. _ _ _ _ - _ . _ _ _ _ _
i l
.
.
.
The licensee was informed about the inspection findings and their preliminary classification Most aspects noted in this report as being referred to the licensee for consideration were also discusse The licensee acknowledged the NRC findings and expressed the intention of evalua ing them and instituting corrective actions as appropriate, i
s
L
. -
-
- . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _