Text

Performance Indicators,Jul 1992
	ML20118A281
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	07/31/1992
From:	; OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20118A280	List: ML20118A279; ML20118A281;
References
	NUDOCS 9208280009
	Download: ML20118A281 (111)
	v • d • e

.

aw,.~.,,-w

.~ .n.nn -eh :,r-mem

- - -- gg FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS JULY 1992

x Al r* '

1 f III{

s '

A, %

Jpgt.m..q e

WFCiLI@]iHillliiffur2 INI5Yi((NICAM3N' /

Prepared by: l I

Production Engineering Division '

System Engineering Test and Performance Group

$882gggj[o$8 p A _.-_.-s. _m__________ .__ - -_

a

%ud of wxn%a, w wn, alhinda,...

il wwass wudem wnd sounuljohynwnl...

il w a, 5fahans, cwawu -%u,, cornanilarwnl...

il w a, w<u,, of ofe,...il w dotag Bsjd>

9M Gs lial liann,, wou,, liann,. alw tawwv-dinaxhd, nel Un 'asu!L of wrhunal, paswas, il w owv o,uru wf waa wh un, wa a,nd Un pnids wnd salujachoiv Gud cornas ,% kaq, Uw ?qhl haal of pevsorv, nelja,sl cau doinu, ths 4M Uwiup.

yaanssy.0%noio

\

- - - - _ - - - _ - - _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ - - - - - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __________________________________}

E i

OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT

~

FORT CALHOUN STATION i I

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT 4

1 e

)

i

.i Prepared By:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group 1 _ _

l JULY 1992

ABSTRACT PURPOSE The

Performance Indicators Program"is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant perior-mance information to OPPD'c personnel responsible for optimizing unit perf ormance. The information is presented in a way that provides ready identification of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing and monitoring Fort Calhoun's plant periormance, with emphasis on saf ety and reliability. Some periormance indicators show company goals or industry information This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation.

SCOPE The conditions, goals, and projections reflected within this report are current as of the end of the rnonth being reported, unless otherwise stated.

In order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing the progtam:

1) Data was selected which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.

2) Established corporate goals and industry information were included for comparison.

3) Formal definitions were developed for each periormance parameter to ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate.

Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report. Please refer comments to the System

, Engineenng Dep&itment's Test and Performance Group. To increase personnel awareness of -

Fort Calhoun Station's plant performance, it is suggested that this report be distnbuted throughout your respective departments.

REFERENCES INPO Good Practices OA 102,

Performance Monitoring Managemorit Informatierf INPO Report Dated November 1984,

Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" NUMARC 87-00," Guidelines and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station .

- Black out at Light Water Reactors", Revision 1, Appendix D, *EDG Reliability Program', dated April 6,1990.

l

- . - - - - - _ . ~ .

Table of Contents / Summary INPO INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS PAGI tNSutiny cPrD CEED UPPER va. 3 TH'i f.ONTH LA.St t.OT!;[ M UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7,000 HOURS CRITICAL. . 0 63. .0 5 09 3 23 . NMA. .3 SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE a.,w.u-:

HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM.. . .. . 0 0014-. .f. 6. .0 0019. . 0 0022 NA. .6 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM . . . 0 0034. . 0 01. . 00027. .00061. . .. . . N A . .7 EMERGEF.CY AC POWER SYSTEM. . 0 0065. 0 024. . 0 0010. . 0 0019. NA, .0 THERMAL PERFORMANCE. . m.. . . . . 99 8A 99 3% - 99 0 %. . 97 9L .D ... 10 UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR . . 841%. L E9 2% . 34 0% .. 91 7 % . .D. .12 UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR.. .187% - 4% C6 0% 83L . D .. .. 13 FUEL REllABILITY INDICATOR nuu g.., - . NA. 75:104. NA .7 5:10-4 . NA . .16 COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE (ww.m 118 uYR. 250YR . -. 236 5 .. . 228 3. . NA . .16 d VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOI.lD l RADIOACTIVE WASTE tcubc h) . _

?.118 54R . 3 000/YR . 833 0.. .7326.~ .. N A .. .17 -

1 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT RATE / DISABLING I

INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE.. . . 0 16. 03. .1.12 . 0 64 . .A. . 18 8

CHEMISTRY INDEX/ SECONDARY l SYSTEM CHEMISTRY . .. 0 20 . 0 45. 0 56 . .0 55 . _NMA. .45 OPERATIONS PAGE 1

i INousiny .pttg., Oteg j um n m. m tutst.o m a t>stt.ovt3 MEND '

STATION NET GENERATION (10.000 Mwh). ,. N A . .. NA , 1103 . . 319.. .,0 .1 ,

, FORCED OUTAGE RATE . .. .. . . 0 25% .. . 2 4% - 12 92%.. .765%..._..A. .2 i

UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR

{ SChAMS PER 7,000 CRITICAL. HOURS . . ..o C3 . .0. 5 09. . 3 23. ..HMA.,.3 i UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM

} ACTUATIONS - (INPO DEFINITION)_ . ....o. ..0. ~1. 0. D...4 i

i

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM .

i ACTUATIONS - (NRC DEFINITION).. .0. 3. 1 . 0 -. .D. .5 l GROSS HE AT RATE . , , ..NA . . NA . 10.480 5 10.194 0. .9 i l EQUIVApNT AVAILABILITY FACTOR . . .. N A .. .. N A '. -.34 4L . 92 7% . D. .11 i

( UNIT CAPA8ILITY FACTOR . . . . 841% -. . 69 2% . ..34 0 % . . 91.7% . c. D .. .12 UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR.. .187% _ . 4 SL . 66 OL 0 3% .. .D. .13 PLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR .. . . . ,, N A . .26 3% . ,0% _ 0% .. . H A ... .14 . i b

.w..,- .=-e_. , ,_.,_.,t. E.,, e w,.-._.-.m,w...- ,-. ..<,w . .m.m

.v__.,,..,_,,...r,,.r. ,,_r, ,.._,..,,......,-,.%..m......r .%-- .~.-....,,-.,,,..,,,..,....c.,.' i

~_._.m.m_ ._m

. l l

1

! OPERMIONS (cont'd) PRE l

enun ny .ctt2. gtta ,

unrr n e COE hc LONW LC LO'dH IES2 1 FUEL REllABILITY INDICATOR (microcutievgfam) . ..NA . . 7 5m10 4 . .NA. . 7 5:10-4 . .NA. 15 3 DAtLY THERMAL OUTPUT (Mwth). . . .. N A . . 1405 . .NA. . N A .. N A.. 19 l

E EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1,000 CRITICAL HOURS.. .. N A . . o 2. 1 22. 0W. A. . 20 l OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET. ,. N A NA NA NA. N A .. .. 21 DOCUMENT REVIEW . , . ..NA- N A ,. NA. . N A .. NA.. 22 J

MAINTENANCE PEI mutiny Ctra ctng overn m cpg det f.eem4 t An f.enin intto EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR l UNIT REllABILITY . . . .NA, NA. NA NA .. .NA. . 23

DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY j (25 DEMANDS) . . . ... N A . _<4. .NA. . NA. _ N A .. . 24 DIESEL GEsJERATOR UN AVAILABILITY tesmma wt ) NA - =210B.DG NA. NA. N A .. .. 25 AGE OF OUTSTANDING mat:JTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON. OUTAGE) . .. N A .. . . N A .. .NA .NA. . A .. .. 26 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON. OUTAGE) . .. NA . , f4A ~ , N A .. .NA. . -.. N A . . 27 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE DACKLOG l GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD ,

(NON. OUTAGE).. . . ..NA. NA, . 50 3%.. . S t.3% . . D . ,, . 2 8 [

RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE . . . . .. N A . J5% .. . a16% . 53 4% . NMA . . 29 PREVENTIVE MAINT EN ANCE ITEMS OVERDUE.. . .. N A . . o 5% . . o 17% . . . t o% . _l. . 30 NUMBER OF OUT.OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS . . . .. .. N A , ..<13 , .10 .9 . D ., .. 31 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME .. .. N A .. .10% - 228%.. 4e%. D. . 32 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE) .. . ...NA . NA. .1 . o. .D. . 33 MAINTEN ANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE MAINTENA 4CE) ..NA.

. 4350. 394. 380. NMA . 34 PERCt'.NT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES ,

,_00% , :NA. . N L. _ N A .. l. 3 5 (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE) - . . ... N A ._

PERCENT OF OOMPLETED SCHEDULED l MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES i (PRESSURE EOUIPMENT).. , . . . - . . . .. N A .. . 80% . NA. .. NA .. . N A .. ,. 36 l

ii

- - - ~ .- - _. . - -. - - ..-...-. -. _ . - . - - - - - .- --- - . - . - . _ . .

M AINTENANCE (contd)) led meeiny ,cnce, cgEn !

tm.ntn c m pts oynn usi tomt Iring r PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES !

(GENERAL MAINTENANCE) . .. N A . 60% .. ~ N.L .. N A .. .NA...37 -

PERCEtJT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES ,

(MECHANICAL MAtfJTENANCE) . . . .. N A .. .80%. NA. .. N A . ~NA...38 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL) . .. N A . . 80% , .NA . ,. N A . _ f 4A .. . 39 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE i

EVENT REPORTS . . .. .. N A . . 0 .. . 0 .. 0. .. l . . . 40 t

COMPONENT FAILURE ANALYSIS REPORT (CFAR)

SUMMARY

.. . .. N A NA, .NA .NA. .A . 41 l NUMBER OF NPRDS

MULTIPLE FAILURES . . . . .. N A . NA. .NA. . N A .. .. NA .42 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS . .. .. N A . N A .. . NA . NA. . NA . .43

~

CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE . . . .. N A . 2 00EL , G 19E.7 . 6 22E.7. . NA . . 44 ;

I CliE@STRY AND R ADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION PAGE I

mUET RY QEEQ, QEEQ uErge Q;n Tws symi uit tony Inga l COLLECTIVE RADIATION l EXPOSURE (person . rem) . .118 $rYR , -.250iVR . .236 5 . 228 3 . . N A .. .13 VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE . . . . . . 2.118 6YR . 3.000/YR . . 839 0. . 732 6.. .. NA . . .17 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY... .. . 0 20. . 0 45. .0557,

. 0.55. N MA .. . 45 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT . . . .. N A ,. . 2% . .1 06% . .1.11 % . ..l .46 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS - . . .. N A _ . N A .. . 0% _ . 0% . _ l .. ...... 4 7 -

IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS l OU T-OF-SERVICE . . . ~ . - . . . . ..N A . .6. . 24. . 24 . .NMA, .48 '

HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED .. . .. N A . .. N A , .0. .155s .. N A ,. .49 l MAXIMUM INDIVICUAL l RADlATION EXPOSURE (mrem). .. N A . .1.50aYR m . 266. . ..m 104 . .. N A . . . . 50 TOTAL SKIN AND -

CLOTHING CONTAM!NATlONS . . .N A . .144 .243 .224. NMA. .. $ 1 l

l iii - l 1

- .-..-.. _ _ - . . ~ - . . _ _ _ . ~ . . , _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . , _ _ _ . _ . . . - - -. ..._ , . . .: _ ._

,dEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION (cont'd) PAGE e uriny m crco errt n m ggn tH s u,*HH LAST LOHH 18W3 DECONTAMINATED PADIATION CONTROLLED AREA. . . . .. N A . . 89% . 87 0%. 870%. . NI.s A . . 52 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGR AM . .. N A . .. N A .11. .1 .D. . 53 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS. . ..NA . . remove umo . 60 . 66 . .. D . . 54 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT (cunes).. .. tJA . 3 c yr. 143 7. NA. N A .. . 55 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE DEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT (cunes) . .. N A - 225'yr 39 5 .. N A .. . . l .. . . . 5 6 SECURITY EAGE rmuni ctca ccED UPPE A M Q21 TH!S LO'Mjj LAET LONTH IPEND LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) . . NA i

. . . N A . .- . . -,3 2 .. 33 . .1. . . 57 SECUR11Y NON. SYSTEM FAILURES . . . - . . . ... N A . .. N A m .. N A . . NA ~ . NA . . 58 SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES. . . .. N A . ..NA . NA NA NA. . 59 1

1 MEERIALS AND OUISIDE SERVICES CAGE Eltti QEED CEfD scn m c2n ECT LO'UH 1AST 8.OPH IPfND AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NotJ OUTACE).. . .. N A . 35% 2 0m .21%. . l . . 60 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE ($ milhan).. ..N A - NA- .12 6 124 .NA- ~61 SPARE PARTS ISSUED ($ thousands),. . .. N A = . NA . .199 0. . 120 1. NA. ,. 61 INVENTORY ACCURACY , .. .. N A . , 99% . 100% . . 94% . 1- 62 STOCKOUT RATE. . . ,. N A . . 2 6% .. . 0 32% ,. .12%. ..l o 62 EXPEDITED PURCHASES., .. N A . _0 $% .. 1 8% .. 0 M. .. . . N MA ., . C'3 INVOICE BREAKDOWN. . . . . .. NA . . NA . NA. NA.....NA. . 64 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING., . . . . .. N A . .. N A . . 59 3L . 83 7% . . I ,. . 64 QESIGN ENGINEERING EAGE E.12'E U11 CEED QEE2 uprt n % c;n Twe og tatt ueenH 1832 OUTSTANDING MOD!riCATIONS.. -.NA NA. 173 - :176. .l. . 65 I

iv

l l

l l QESIGN ENGtNEERING (cont d) PAGE tC2ilEl CSE2 CfED L1ELEm G2h LC.OtHH LAS1 LOWi IEUC TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING) . .NA 0 17 -. .. . 21 .. ..

ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR) ORE AKDOWN . .NA. .NA. 181. 170 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STAlUS. .. N A

. NA .169 170. ..

ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BRE AKDOWN . ..NA NA. . NA .NA. .... .69 It1DMSTRI AL SEI,Y PAGE 1:D2MEX CIE2 OfJD untrn e Cm Tu:t t.ign ort seinn IEI,tm DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE . 016 .03 1 12 0 64 . A, .18 RECORDABLE INJURY /ll.LNESS CASES FREQUENCY HATE NA 20 . 3 00 2 23 A. .,70 11US.i AN RESOQ3Cf.S PAGE enasTny CEnn crga unor n 4~-. can THis teann LAsi!etqu int *a NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERS . ..NA. NA .0. I 1. . 71 LER ROOT CAUSE 9RE AKDOWN . .. h A . NA. .NA NA NA . '72 STAFFING LEVEL . .. NA NA NA. . NA . NA. . 73 PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE . .. N A NA NA . NA NA. .73 TR AINING AND QU AdjEl.C ATION PAGE 2C2 lar CfE0 CPID uortn e. g;g nwa;um uit teann Intra LICENGED OPERATOR REQU AllFICATION TRAINING,. ..NA NA .NA- .NA. .NA. .74 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS., .. N A .NA. .NA, .NA. .NA. . 75 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS . .NA. .NA 1 461, . NA . .NA. . 76 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING.. NA. ,NA. . $ 683 . .NA. . N A .. .77 v

i 4 6

QUALITY ASS (,01AtiCfi PAGE b

d WB1SL CCED CECD \

'mam con ILus LON1t1 LAtt MSN1H Intra ,

I VIOLATIONS PER 1.000 INSPECTION HOURS . . NA . .16 .3 73. 3 28 _ .A. . 78 !

t COMPAR! SON OF VIOLATIONS i AMONG REGION IV PLANTS . .. NA . .NA, NA. .NA .. NA . . . 79 CUML,JTIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) . .. N A . N A .. tu3- .1 v3 . .. A . . . 80 !

OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE i I ACTION REPORTS . .. NA NA. . 72.. .83 . I _ . 81 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED j CORRECTIVE ACllON REPORTS. . . N A ., . NA . 1/3 48. .NA . .82 l CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIF. CARS vs.

NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs. '

LERo REPORTED.. . ., N A . NA. NA. NA . ..NA. .83 4

REFUELIN OUT AGE 4

, m J!!ny CIER CrfQ emnm m Ers voNTH v31 vanitj inLto MWO PLANNING STATUS .. . . N A .. . NA , . NA - NA, .NAs 84 OVFRALL PROJECT STATUS 4 NA. .4A. . NA . _ NA ., . N A .. 85 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 15 OUTAGE ,

MODIFICATION PLANNING . , . N A .. .NA , . NA . . N A .. NA .. .86 8

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS.. , . . . ..m. 87 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX. ., . . . . . .95- ,

REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST . . . . . 97 5

EUMM ARY SECJ1Q.tl POSITIVE TREND REPORT . . . , ,. . . 98 ADVERSE TREND P.EPORT.. . . . . . . . . . . . - . 9 0-INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT . . . 98 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES . , , . c. 99 DJHLE OF CONTENTS'SUMM ARY TREND SYldPgQL$

A - ADVERSE TREND '

l . IMPROVED PERFORMANCE D - DECLINING PERFORMANCE :

NMA.NEEDS MANAGEMENT ATTENTION NA NOT APPLICADLE/AVAILABLE i

l Vi l l

l l

50_ O nei ceneraten n0.000 uw ws) g 40- 33 n 3, o, j si.is 3 30ce Cycle 14 3' 88 g 30- s . s Refuehn9 2n2 >+

! .f ,3 is Outage 8 20- 3n te . EP % a

o. % 13 28 "3 "*l(' $f j, N Q

- w , , 7; ^Y ua 30.27 10- p 3 . % u ,, :

an ,

m; - +

0 i '", , ,

, , ,. 3 , , , ,

Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 STATION NET GENER ATION This indicator shows the nei generation of the Fort Calhoun Station for the reporting month.

During the month of July 1992, a net total of 102,680 MWH was generated by the Fort Calhoun Station.

Unplanned energy losses for the month were a result of the forced outage that occurred on 7/3/92 due to the loss of an inverter and the subsequent reactor trip. The generator was brought on-line at 0610 hours0.00706 days 0.169 hours 0.00101 weeks 2.32105e-4 months on 7/23.

During the month of June 1992 unplanned energy losses were a result of a forced -

outage that occurred on 6/1/92 due to a dropped control rod. The plant was returned to 100% power on 6/4/92.

The station was returned to service after the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage when the reactor was taken critical on 5/1/92 at 1035 hours0.012 days 0.288 hours 0.00171 weeks 3.938175e-4 months and the generator was put on line on 5/3/92. A forced outage occurred on 5'14/92 when the turbine generator tripped on a false high level moisture separator trip signal which cau,;ed a simu!!aneous reactor trip. ,

The reactor was returned to critical and the generator was put on line on 5/15/92.

Unplanned energy losses for May were: 1) the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage extension 2) the reduction to 58% power for the inoperabic condenser valve: 3) the reactor trip; 4) the hold at 48% power for repair on a feedwater pump suction valve; and 5) the 5/31-dropped control rod caused by a faulty clutch coil.

Data Source: Station Generation Report Accountability. Patterson Adverse Trend: None 1-

4Wq Forced Ostage Rate

--O - 1991 E :902 Fort Cn!no m Goala 2'# ". -

lg999j

-Q- 1 D t ha ey Uppor 1a Purcen:w (o 29,.)

1 S% -

9.7 93 %-

1.4 a

B gf O--O O O-O-O O - O--O-O O O

,r 1, V [ , og_ u m g

'89 '90 '91 Aug91 Sep Oct fJov Doc Jan Feb Mar Anr May Jun Jut 02 FORCE 0 0UTAGE RATE The forced outage rate was reported as 12.9% for the twelve months from 8/1/91 to 7/

31/92.

A forced outage caused by thn loss of an inverter and the subsequent reactor trip oc-curred on 7/3/92. The generator was brought on line at 061_0_ hours on 7/23/92.

A forced outage occurred on 6/1/92 when the unit was shutdown due to a dropped control rod. The rod was dropped at 2305 on 5/31/92 and shutdown began at that time.

The generator was taken off line at 0234 on 6/1/92 and the rea:: tor was chutdown at 0330 on the same day. The reactor was returned to critical on 6/2/92 at 0211 and the generator was put on-line at 0852 the same day.

A forced outage occurred on 5/14/92 at 1557 hours0.018 days 0.433 hours 0.00257 weeks 5.924385e-4 months when the turbine generator tripped on a faise Ngh level moisture separator trip signal which caused a simultaneous reactor trip. The reactor was returned to critical at 0537 on 5/15/92 and the generator was on-line at 1150 hours0.0133 days 0.319 hours 0.0019 weeks 4.37575e-4 months at 5/15/92.

During the months of September ar'd October 1991 a forced outage occurred when the station batteries were declared inoperable. The generator was taken off line on 9/12/91 and remained off line until 10/6/91.

The generator was taken off line on October 18 & 19,1991 due to a stearn leak on a turbine control valve before seat drain line. The generator was again taken on line'on October 25 & 26 due to a steam leak from an instrument tap on the high pressure tur-bine.

c The 1992 and 1991 Fort Calhoun goals .'or Forced Outage Rate are 2.4%

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & NERC GAD Forms Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: An adverse tren6 is indicated based on three consecutive months of dechning performance.

2

FcS Reactor Scrams Per 7.000 Hours Cntical(Year to date)

--+- FCS Ruactor Serams Pet 7,000 Houis Cntical(for the last 3S months)

-O- 1991 & 19 4 F ort Ca noun Goa's

-tr-- 1995 INPO :ndustry Goat

-O- industry Upper 10% (0.63 per 7.030 hours3.472222e-4 days 0.00833 hours 4.960317e-5 weeks 1.1415e-5 months entical over a 36 rnonth t.mo penod)

~

6-4-

2-o.

", ', ~P ,

1 y Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jut 92

$~

d' C Number of FCS Reactor Scrams

, 3-1 1 I~

0 0 0 0 I i i i i 0 o

i o

o -

o o

o o p o

,R 3 3 i

'88 '89 '90 '91 Aug91 Sep Oct Nov oec Jan Feb Mar Apt 3 3

, May Jun Jui92 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7,000 HOURS CRITICAL The upper graph shows tne number of unplanned automatic reactor scrams per 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months critical (as defined in INPO's 11/91 publication

Detailed Descriptions of Interna-tional Nuclear Power Plant Performance Indicators and Other Indicators") for Fort Cal-houn Station. This value is calculated by multiplying the total number of scrams in a specified time period by 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months , then dividing that number by the total number of critical hours in the same time period. The year to-date station value is 5.69 and the value for the last 36 months is 0.71 for the month of July 1992. The lower graph shows the number of unplanned automatic reactor scrams that occurred during each month for the last twelve months.

There was one unplanned automatic reactor scram in July 1992. This scram occurred on July 3 at 2336 as a result of the loss of inverter No. 2.

There was one unplanned automatic reacter scram in May 1992. This scram occurred on May 14 at 1557 when the turbine generator tripped on a false high level moisture separator trip signal which caused a simultaneous reactor trip. - The last unplanned at "matic reactor scram prior to this occurred on July 2,1986.

The 1992 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams per 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months critical has been set at zero. The 1995 INPO industry coalis one unplanned automatic reactor scram per 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months critical. The industry upper ten percentile value is approximately 0.63 scrams per 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months critical for a 36 month time period.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 3

i I

i

! 1 O Safety System Actuaticns !

+ 1992 Fon Ca:houn Goal E Industry Upper 10 Percentilo 2-t 1 1- -

i i ii 0- m ,m ,- u , G r-C i C i U i O 4 C i U FC i C i

'89'90'91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec9?.

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(INPO DEFINITION)

There was one unplcnned safety system actuation during the merith of July 1992 due to the loss of an inverter and the subsequent reactor trip on 7/3/92.

The 1992 goal for the number of unplanned salety system actuations is zero.

The industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system actuations per year is zero.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs) .

Accountability: Jaworski/Foley/Ronn ng Adverse Trend: None i

(

{

4

1 12 FAonth Running Total SSA i 10- 0

-O-- Critical Hours 900 O

Safety System Actuations (SSA)

{ B- 800

! 7 I T p ( 700 l l'l

{2 0- 600 $o 3:: M v

i

?;j E 500 *

& 5 E }

j [4- 400h l S U 300 4

4 5 2 4 7 2- ~

v\ ,

200 2 v l l

j [ fs) - - - 100 -

0

,Q o 11 ,w a l '89*90'91 A S O N D J F iA A M J J A S O N D J F PA A M J J 1990 1991 1992 i

l j UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(NRC DEFINIT!ON) l This indicator shows the number of unplanned safety system actuations (SSAs) which

include the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the Safety injection

Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classification of SSAs in-2 cludes actuations when major equipment is operated and when the logic syctems for these safety systems are challenged.

l

An unplanned safety system actuation occurred on July 3,1992 due to the loss of an inverter and the subsequent reactor trip.

{ An unplanned safety system actuation occurreo en May 14,1992 when the turbine

, generator tripped on a false high level moisture separator trip signal which caused a l simultaneous reactor trip and rubsequent anticipatory start signal to both diesel genera- ,

tors.

Tne 1992 Fort Calhout .

1r this indicator is a maximum of three.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Jaworski/Foley/Ronning Adverse Trend: None 5

i 1

- , , - . . , , - . . . - - - - - - - - . , . . ,~- -. . . ,..-- - - - . . . . - - -- - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - -

C 1992 Monthly High Pressure Safety injection System Unavailabmty Value

---N- 1992 H;gh Pressure Safety inject:on System Unavaitabihty Value Year-to Date I - O -- 1991 & 1992 Fort Cathoun Goals

, -H)- 1991 H4gn Pressure Safety inject'.on System Unavailab.tity Vatue Year-to Dc'e

-A- 1995 INPQ industry Goal (0.02) g -{")- irWstry Upper 10 % (0.0014) 0.025 -

0.02 - A 6 6- 6 4- A 6 6 A 0.015 -

Cycle 14 Refueling o.01 - O O- -C O Outage O C -- O O o.005 - 41- "

O % , , , , , ,

Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju!92 HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the High Pressure Safety injection System unavailability value, as defined by INPO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the repon-ing month.

The High Pressure Safety injection System unavailability value for July 1992 was 0.0.

The 1992 year-to-date HPSi;navailability value was 0.0019 at the end of July, There were no (zero) hours of planned or unplanneci unavailability in J'.dy, in June 1992 there were 1.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months of planned unavailabihty for surveillance tests.

j in May 1992 there were 1.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months of planned unavailaoility for surveillance tests.-

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 0.008.- The 1995 INPO industry goalis 0.02 and the industry upper ten percentile value (for the three year peried trom 1/89.

through 12/91) is approximately 0.0014.

Data Source: Jaworski!Schaffer Accountability: Jaworski/Schaffer Adverse Trend: None 6

A

t

[,] 1992 Monthly Auxdiary Feedwater System Unavadabihty Va!ue s

-h- 1992 Auxilia y Feedwater System Unava!!aomty Value Year to date

--O-- 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goa!s

-4(>- 1991 Auxuary Foodwater System UnavaHabsaty Value Year-to-date

-A- 1995 INPO Industry Goa!

--G- Meustry Upper 10% (0.0034) 0 025- 6 A A--A- A A- 6- 6 0,02 - 0 O O O Q 0.0 ",5 -

0.01

\o Cycle 14 Refueling A O O Outage 0.005 - se- ~~"~~~M a o a- a a a a-o-2 0- t i>-- W , -* , ,

, 3 Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul02 2

r AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Auxiliary Feedwater System Unavailability value, as defined by INPO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the reporting month.

The Auxiliary Feedwater System Unavailability Value for July 1992 was 0.0027. The 1992 year-to-date AFW unavailabihty value was 0.0057 at the end of July. There were 1.6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months of p!anned unavailability for surveillance tests in July.

In June 1992 there were 2.82 hours9.490741e-4 days 0.0228 hours 1.35582e-4 weeks 3.1201e-5 months of planned unavailabikty for a PM and 7.33 hours3.819444e-4 days 0.00917 hours 5.456349e-5 weeks 1.25565e-5 months of unplanned unavailability for corrective maintenance on a flow instrument.

In May 1992 preventive maintenance activities resulted in 2.67 hours7.75463e-4 days 0.0186 hours 1.107804e-4 weeks 2.54935e-5 months o' planned un--

availability and there were 10.9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months of unplanned unavailability due to corrective maintenance following the initial attempt to periorm a PM.

1 he 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 0.01. The 1995 INPO industry goalis C.025 and the industry upper ten percentile value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12T91)is approximately 0.0034.

Data Source: Jaworski!Hilgenkamp Accountabikty: Jaworski/Hilgenkamp Adverse Trend: None 7

O 1992 Monthly Emergency AC Power Unavat: ability Value

-N- 1992 Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value Year-to Date IGOODI

-O- 1991 &1992 Fort Calhoun Caats (0.024)

- 1991 Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value Year to Date 0.06- -@ 1995 INPO Industry Goat (0.025)

-O- Industry Upper 10 % (.0065)

> l p" ~=

0.04 -

0.03 -

N .c c g.. g g .g .g 4- y y 4.. .g 4 .;.4 0.02 -

0.01 -

o-o a -c o n o o o m-n o i

Sep i

Oct i

Nov i 1--M i -W i H i XT* i i

< "191 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

.J;cator shows the Emergency AC Power System unavailability value, as defined sy INPO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the reporting month.

The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value tcr July 1992 is 0.00. There were no (zero) hours of planned or unplanned unavailability for July. The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value year to-date is 0.0016.

in June 1992 there were 9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months of planned unavailability for DG-2 for retorqueing radiator fan retair;ing bolts.

In May 1992 there were 7.9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months of planned unavailability for DG-1 to tighten the fan blades and repair a starting air solenoid valve.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 0.024. The 1995 INPO industry goalis 0.025 and the industry upper ten percentile value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91) is approximate!y 0.0065.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning Accountability: Jaworski/Ronning Adverse Trend: None 8

13-0 Marthly Gross Heat Rate

-A- Year-to Date Gross Heal Rate 3 12-E o

8 e

11-10520 10304 -

mv -- ~ 10023 Cyde 14 fa$:

I. ' ?9 . - a, Refue!!ng 2 -A.d

),; : n 10- Outaae

$p%

, ;yi

+

- wge] fd -

n

g; NYg: j'f, s : :

W'}'f ,

9 . , , . , , , , , , , ,

'89 '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 GROSS HEAT RATE This indicator shows the Gross Heat Rate (GHR) for the reporting month, the year-to-date value, and the year-end GHR for the previous 3 years.

The gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station was reported as 10,480.5 BTU /KWH during the month of July 1992.

The year-to-date gross heat rate was reported as 10,242.3 BTU /KWH.

Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trends: None 9

l l

1

[] 1992 Montn y Thermal Performance

--M - 1992 Year to Date Average Therma! Performanco 4

, --O- 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal'99.3%)

[ GOOD }

- &- 1995 INPO Industry Goat (99 5%)

Industry Upper 10% (99 8%)

100%--

-O - TT D

a

-O-

-a

-- O ~

a a %-11 E -a-J"-D O- D - - D - - O a a -a -A O O---O - O O-- - O' -

C- -

O---O O O O 99% - &

Cycle 14 Refuehng ggg _ Outage g

97%-

96% , , , , ; , , , , , , ,

Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 j THERMAL PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Thermal Performance value for the reporting month, the 1992 Fort Calhoun goal, the 1995 INPO industry goal and the industry median value.

The thermal performance value for the reporting month was 99.6%.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal for this indicator is 99.3%. The 1995 INPO industry goalis 99.5% and the industry upper ten percentile value (for the one year period from 1/90 through 12/91) is approximately 99.8%.

Data Source: Jaworski/Popek Accountability: Jaworski/Popek Adverse Trend: None 10

O Monthly EAF =

Year-to-Date Average EAF -

M0's'r 85 6 g

77 80% -

l GOOD]

t 56 6 60% -, C YC!G 14 Refueting Outage 40% - P'

/ -

/

2C%

f i i 6 0% i i , , ; ; ,

'89 '90 31 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This indicator shows the plaat monthly Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF), the year-to-date EAF for 1992, and the EAF for the previous 3 years.

The EAF for July 1992 was reported as 34.39%. This figure is a result of the forced outage caused by the loss of an inverter and the subsequent reactor trip on 7/3/92. The plant was brought to 90% power on 7/26/92.

The year-to-date average EAF was reported as 40.68%.

Data Source: Dietz!Parra (Manager / Source) 1 Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 11

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -J

O 1992 Monthly Unit Capabihty Factor I

-N- 1992 Year-to Date Average Unit C:1pability Factor 4 1 l GOOD l

-.~. 1991 Year-to-Date Average Unit Capability Factor

--O-- 1991 at992 Fort Calhoun Goals 1

--6-- 1995 INPO Industry Goal (80%)

--C}- industry Upper 10% (84.1% for a Three Year %vorage) 100 % -

g

.90%- h . O ^

'l -% ~

80% -- b -Z' - - .. g u

~O -

O O

c ~

O~ 3 70% - 'O O O O--- O -- -

OM 60% - Cycle 14 Refueling

'I 9'

, M--- .--u 30% -- _

l 20% -

10% -

0%- -

Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Unit Capability (UCF) Factor and the 1995 INPO industry goal. UCF is defined as the ratio of the available energy generation over a given period of time to the reference energy generation (the energy that could be pro-duced if the unit were operated continJously at full power under reference ambient conditions) over the same time period, expressed as a percentage.

The UCF was reported as 34% for the month of July 1992. This figure is a result of the forced outage caused by the loss of an inverter and the subsequent reactor trip on 7/3/

92. The plant was brought to 90% power on 7/26/92.

The year-to-date average unit capability factor was reported as 42.3%.

The 1995 INPO industry goalis 80% and the industry upper ten percentile value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91)is approximately 84.1%.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for Unit Capability Factor is 69.2%. The basis for this goal is 86 days for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage,20 days rampup (10 full power equivalent aays), unplanned loss of 11.5 full power equivalent days, and 10 day rampup (5 full power equivalent days).

Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend; None

^\2

. _ _ _ _ _ . ~ . ._ _ _ _ .

100*4 -

0 1992 uontniy unp anneo capanii:ty toss Factor 90%~ -pt- 1992 Year-to-Date Average Unplanned Capabihty Loss Factor (GOOD]

80% - -.t--- 1991 Year to-Dato Averago Unplanned Capabil.*y Loss Factor p

-- O - 1991 6 1992 Fort Calhoun Goa's 70% -

--b-- 1995 INPO IndJs:ty Goal (4.5%)

60%-

--O-. Incustry Upper 10% (1.87% for a Three Year Avotage)

. s0% -

40% -

Cycle 14 30%-

Refuehng Outage 20T M

10%- 1* ~*i"~~r /

0% -

Aug91 i

Sep

']

Oct Nov m ; 7 ,

Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju!92 UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Unplanned Capability Loss Factor (UCLF) , the Fort Calnoun UCLF goal for 1992, and the 1995 INPO industry goal. UCLF is defined as the ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a given period of time, to the refer-ence energy generation (the energy that could be producod if me unit were operated continuously at full power under reference ambient conditions), expressed as a percent-a09-The UCLF was reported as 66% for the month of July 1992. Unplanned energy losses for the month were due to the forced outage caused by the loss of an inverter and the subsequent reactor trip on 7/3/92 and operating at less than full power from '7/23 through 7/31 after bringing the unit back on-line. ,

. ne year-to-date r"arage UCLF is 15.4%.

The 1995 INPO industry goal is 4.5% and the industry upper ten percentile value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91)is approximately 1.87%.

The Fort Calhoun goal for Unplanned Capability Loss Factor is 4.5%. The basis for this goalis an unplanned loss of 11.5 full power equivalent days and 10 day rampup (5 full power equivalent days).

Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Patterson ;

Adverse Trend: None ,

13 I i

1

. _ . - . - - - . . - -, -~

O i992 uontniy Pianneo capao.nty toss Factor

-M- 1992 Year to-Date Average PCLF

=

1991 Year.to.Date Average PCLF

-O- 1991 & 1992 Fort ca' noun Gr.11s ! O!

Y

-O- ladustry Median Value (18.3% for a Three Year Average)

Cycle 14 Refueling Outage 100% - -

9 0, -

80%-

70% -- A y.. .-

60%-

/ N

$0.$_~ I 30% -

- _g___(, _,,

c c g

= = = = = /= = a -

c = = =

k,.___.h. S _$_. -. .

l l Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 PLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Planned Capability Loss Factor (PCLF), the PCLF year-to date monthly average, and the Fort Calhoun yearly average goals for 1991 and 1992. PCLF is defined as the ratio of the planned energy losses during a given period of time, to the reference energy generation (the energy that could be pro-duced if the unit were operated continuously at full power under reference ambient conditions), expressed as a percentage.

The PCLF was reported as 0% for the month of July 1992. Energy losses for July were due to the forced outage caused by the loss of an inverter and the subsequent reactor trip on 7/3/92. These energy losses were classified as unplanned.

The year-to-date-average monthly PCLF for 1992 is 42.5%.

^

The 1992 Fort Calhoun yearly average Planned Capability Loss Factor goalis 26.3%.

The basis for this goalis 86 days for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage and 20 days rampup (10 full power equivalent days). The 1991 goal was 7%.

The PCLF industry median value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91) is 18.3%.

Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 14 e

O Fuel Reliabihty Indicator

~

, 1995 INPC Industry Goal (0.5 X 10 3 Microcuries/ Gram) '

--O- 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal 4

4- _ . ,

E 9 _

J' e n .<

3- .g is .

O h- 2 Cycle 14 2

" ^

Refueling FRl Not

Ou'. age Availab!e

, . for July 1~

92 h- f n-g ..

3

.O g.

4g .C; g

O

. -.t 3

4 0 , , ,

3 7 , , , , , ,

Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The Fuel Reliability indicator (FRl) was not reponed for the month of July 1992 due to the limited data available for trending. Only a few days in the beginning of the month and a few days at the end of the month meet the INPO criteria for steady state opera-tion.

The INPO definition of steady state operation includes those days when the plant was at power levels above 85% and the power levels did not vary more than + or - 5% for at least 3 days. Only the iodine concentration values from the days that meet this steady state criteria can be factored into the INPO fuel reliability indicator.

The last detected fuel failure was during Cycle 13. The FRI values observed during the later months of Cycle 13 were in the 2.5 X 10-3 to 3.9 X 10-3 microcuries/ gram range.

A Fort Calhoun goal of 7.5 X 10-4 microcuries/ gram will be utilized in 1992. Fon Cal-houn recognizes the INPO 1995 U.S. industry goal of 5.0 X 10-4 microcuries/ gram and will revise the annual FRI goal accordingly.

The FRI was not applicable while the plant was shutdown for the refueling outage in February, March and April, and was not reported during those months.

Data Source: Holthaus/Guliani Accountability: Patterson/Spilker Adverse Trend: None 15 l

l

O uontn y Personnei Raetat on exposure Pereonnet Cumu!atve Rad:ation Exposure (Person-Rem)

-O- Fort Cathoun Annual Goal (250 Person-Rem) 400 - --l.r- 1995 INPO Industry Goal (165 Person-Rem)

-O- Industry Upper 10% (118.5 Person-Rem for a Three Year Average) 300 - IGOODI 276 O O O O O- - O- O O O OM O

. Wi%

M 200_

M A a , a a b- -a a a- a a M

m m

100 -

O-O- -D-O - O-O- -O-O- O-O-O -O 93.4 .

m 'J Ii Iff

%M

' % /' h 52 W///

%'$ j$'$ ?Ah 0

, m i i 6 i

'89 '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE During July 1992, 8.174 percon rem was recorded by TLDs worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station. The year-to-date exposure is 236.47 person-rem.

The Fort Calnoun goal for personnel radiation exposure (cumulative) during 1992 is 250 person-rem. Cumulative radiation exposure for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage was

, 2',5.899 person-rem, which exceeds the outage goal of 210 person-rem. The goal was not achieved because the outage was longer than anticipated and there was more exposure than expected due to the stuck reactor vessel stud and the thermal shield inspection.

The 1995 lNPO industry goalis 185 person-rem per year. The industry upper ten percentile vahie (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91)is approximately 118.5 person-rem per year. The three year average for Fort Calhoun Station from 1/89 through 12/91 is 140.4 person-rem per year.

Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 16 ;

1

h I

I

-+- Cumulative Dry Active Waste Srint For Processing (in cubic feet) l

., 25000- !

20000 - 2 l

15000-10000- l 5000 -

0 - , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jan92 Feo Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 1

O Padtoactive Waste Buried Tnis uenin (in cubic feet)

Cumulative Radicactive Waste Buried

-O- Fort Ca'houn Goat For Waste Buried (3,000 cubic feet)

-a- 1995 INPO Industry Goal (3.884 cubic feet) i

-O- Industry Upper 10% (2.118 5 cubic feet)

~~~

a a a a a a a a a a a- a

f. R 3000- C O O O O O O O O O O O l < 1334 D O- -O O-O O O O O O-O O 1500-

~ s

, ,6 4 0 - M

. '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 i Year-end Total VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE d

The upper graph shows the volume of radioactive oil and dry radioactive waste sent for processing. The lower graph shows the volume of the monthly radioactive waste bur-iec, the cumulative annual total for radioactive waste buried, and the year-end totals for radioactive waste buried the previous 2 years, Cumulative amount of solid radwaste shipped off site for processing (Cubic feet) 19,520.0 f Amount of solid radwaste shipped off-site for processing during July (cubic feet) 0.0 Volt.me of solid radioactive waste which was buried during July (cubic feet) 106.4 Cumu!ative volume of sohd radioactive waste buried in 1992 (cubic feet) 839.0 Amount of solid .*adioactive waste in temporary storage (cubic feet) 240.6 l

i The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for the voLme ci solid radioactive waste which has been

buried is 3,000 cubic feet. The 1995 INPO industry goalis 110 cubic meters (3,864 cubic feet) per year. The industry upper ten percetile v81ue is approximatcly 60 cubic meters (2,118.5 cubic feet) per year.

l Data Source: Patterson/Breuer (Manager / Source) i l Accountability: Patterson/Bilau 1 l

l Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 17

1992 Disabling injury /lliness Frequency Rate

> 1991 Disabling injury / Illness Fwquency Rate 1,6 -

-O- Fort Oathoun Goal (0.5, 1.4 - --6-- 19951NPO industry Goal (0.5) 1,2 -

IGOODI 1- k 0.8 -

o6-A A ts - si a a Jb A A A

, 0.4 - N N h g C- O O- O O- v O O O- O O 02-0 i .,s , s , , , , , , , , , ,

Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

This indicator snows the 1992 oisabling injury / illness frequency rate. The 1991 dis-abling injury / illness frequency rate is also shown.

The disabling injury / illness frequency rate for July was 1.12. There were two lost time accidents, both back injuries, reported at the Fort Calhoun Station in July 1992. The total number of lost time accidents that have been reported during 1992 is 4. The 1992 disabling injury / illness frequency rate goal was set at 0.30. The 1995 INPO Industry <

goal is 0.50.

s The disabling injury / illness frequency rate for the past twelve months is 0.54 The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury / illness frequency rate s approxi-mately 0.16.

Year Year-End Rate i 1989 0.4 1990 0.5 1991 0.4 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Richard

- Adverse Trend: The manager of the Safety Department has stated that, based on this indicator's 1992 values being above the 5 year average values, an adverse trend is indicated.

SEP 25 & 26 18

O Thermal Output

-C)- Fort Calhoun 1495 MW Goal Tech Spec 1500 MW Limit 1500 - W o

(1000 -

4 e

2 Tc E

O g 500-A s

01 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 l

i DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The above thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level during July 1992, the 1500 thermal megawatt average technical specification limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal.

The daily thermal output chart for July reflects the forced outage caused by the loss of an inverter and the subsequent reactor trip on 7/3/92. The plant was brought to 90%

i power en 7/26/92.

Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

! Accountability: Patterson/Trausch Adverse Trend: None l

1 I

19 1 I

_~

l 1

Equipment Forced Outage Rate i 2-1.8 - -O- 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal 1.6 -

1.4 -

1.2 -

1-0.8 -

0.6 -

% 0.5 '

L : O.4_

0.13 l :

0.2 - C O O

--C O O O O O O O i

b 6 i

~

i 0

'89 '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1,000 CRITICAL HOURS The equipment forced outage rate per 1,000 critical hours was 1.22 for the months from January through July 1992.

There was one equipment forced outage during July due to the loss of an inverter and the subsequent reactor trip on 7/3/92.

There was one equipment fcrced outage during June due to a dropped control rod. The rod was dropped at 2305 on 5/31/92 and reactor shutdown commenced at that time.

The generator was taken off-line at 0234 on 6/1/92 and was brought back on-line at 0852 on 6/2/92.

There was one equiprnent forced outage during May. Tnis equipment 'orced outage occurred on May 14 when the turbine generator tripped on a false high level moisture separator trip signal which caused a simultaneous reactor trip.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 0.2.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Patterson/ Jaworski Adverse Trend: An adverse trend is indicated based on three consecutive months of declining performance.

m

4 l

Operations 1992 Buoget ($ Ma! ion) 1 80 -M- 1992 Cumu!at;ve Total ($ Milhon)

! 60-4 40- "

]

~-F 20- *p%

i ,

O - - -

Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 i

Maintenance 1992 Budget ($ MJIion)

, 40-30- -M- 1992 Cumulative Total ($ Minion)20-39_ , ,, <c- ,.

Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 OPERATIONS AND M AINTENANCE BUDGET i

The Operations and Maintenance Budge! Indicator showsihe budget year to-date as well as the actual expenditures for operations ard maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station.

l The budget year-to-date for Operations was 42,429,100 dollars for July 1992 while the actual cumulative expenditures through July totaled 37,730,134 dollars. The 1992 year-I end budget for operations has been revised to 63,059,800 dollars, which is a reduction of 3,60' 000 dollars.

l The budge: year-to-date for Maintenance was 14,604,500 dollars for July 1992 while the j actual cumulative expenditures through July totaled 13,449,253 dollars. The 1992 year-

! end budget for maintenance has been revised to 18,342,600 dollars, whicn is an in-crear of 188,000 dollars.

I Dat _ source: G'eason/ Parent (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Scofield Adverse Trend: None i

21 i

O Documents seneouied for seview 500 -

O Documents Reviewed Overdue Documents 400-300 -

E 200 - ,,

? -

s

?

i [

'p 2

.c 3

i, S 9 ;,

100- I y _&

) _T i

? I 5;

~

?

) \

~$ _ ,

f g

y 4o -

7

_3_ e g

.y 9 ,.

c z

1-3 0

I i i i I i 6 i I i 1 Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicator shows the nurnber of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month. These document reviews are performed in house and include Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual.

During July 1992 there were 201 document reviews completed while 21 document reviews were scheduled. At the end of July, there were 48 document reviews overdue.

During the month of July there were 71 new or renamed documents reviewed. These new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed again in 1994.

Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None SEP 46 e

\ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ -

[d Number of Failures /20 Demands -m- Trigger Values for 20 Demands Number of Failures /So Demands -V- Trigger Values for So Demands O Number of Failures / loo Demands --

Trigger Values for 100 Demands 8-l GOOD}

G- +

V -

V V - --7 W " '7--- -

"r 2" V-- 3r 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4- - - - - -

p - - - -

g = ;;; 'l g-

g -

=

22 22 22 22 22 2 2 2 2-z-

7-h $ i $ I 1 1 1 1 1 1 0

[ h ?

h k I h o o,'

o o o i i i i i i i i i , i i Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY This bar graph shows three monthly indicators pertaining to the number of failures that were reported during the last 20,50, and 100 emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values which correspond to a high level of confidence that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when the failure values are below the corresponding trigger val-ues. The Fort Calhoun 1992 goalis to have fewer failures than these trigger values.

The demands counted for this indicator include the respective numLc of starts and the respective number of load-runs for both Diesel Generators combined. The number of start demands includes all valid and inadvertent starts, including all start-only demands and all start demands that are followed by load run demands, whether by automatic or manualinitiation. Load-run demands must follow successful starts and meet at least one of the following criteria: a load-run that is a tr uit of a real load signal, a load-run test expected to carry the plant's load and duration as stated in the test specifications, and a special test in which a diesel generator was expected to be operated for a mini-mum of one hour and to be loaded with at least 50% of design load (see exceptions and other demand criteria in the Definition Section of this report).

The demand failure which occurred during the month of August 1991 for DG-2 was due to a seal failure on the jacket water pump.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Ronning Adverse Trend: None 23

O DG 1 Failures /25 Demands l GOOD l O DG-2 Failures /25 Demands 5- O Failure Trigger Value for 25 Demands / Fort Calhoun Goal 4- C C -O O O O O O O O O O 3-2 2 2 2 2 2 2- - -

- IS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1- s .

P .

F ..Y

[t y

7 2 q' ,

m 4 4 '

0 [ 0 , 0 O O + 0 0 0 0 y 0 0 O m 0 , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju192 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS)

This indicator shows the number of failures experienced by each emergency diesel generator during the last 25 start demands and the last 25 load-run demands. A trigger value of 4 failures within the last 25 demands is also shown. This trigger value of 4 failures within 25 demands is the Fort Calhoun goal for 1991.

It must be emphasized that in accordance with NUMARC criteria, certain actions will take place in the event that any one emergency diesel generator experiences 4 or more failures within the last 25 demands on the unit. These actions are described in the Definitions Section of this report. A Standing Order has been drafted for the Fort Cal-houn Station to institutionalize and formally approve / adopt the required NUMARC ac-tions.

Diesel Generator DG-1 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 demands on the unit.

Diesel Generator DG-2 has experierced one failure during the last 25 demands on the unit. An air damper roll pin failure occurred in July 1991, Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Ronning Adverse Trend: None 24

s O Planned Hours of D:eser Generator No. 2 Unava!! ability

@ Unplanned Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavadab;ll:y l

O Est; mated Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unava:!abi'ity N Planned Hours of D<esel Generator No.1 Unavailability ,

C Unplanned Hours of Diesel Generator No.1 Unavailabikty l 1

l

& 200 -

Ts :

150- 1 2

y100-y 50-

$o b

- i i nm i i i i i , 4 i

r, i i Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju92 20-2 3 --+- Cumulat:ve Hours of DG-1 Un3vailabikty for 1992 j 15-j -@- Cumu!ative Hours of DG-2 Unavailabihty for 1992 e 10-3 . M i' 0

85-

/'

0 ? , ? , ? ; y i ? i , ,

Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju!92 DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY This indicator provides a monthly illustration of diesel generator unavailability. The top graph shows the diesel generator planned, unplanned, and estimated unavailable hours for DG-1 and DG-2 for each month. The lower graph shows the cumulative hours of unavailability for each diesel generator for the year-to-date.

During July, there were no (zero) hours of planned or unplanned unavailability for DG-1 and DG-2.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis a maximum of 210.82 hours9.490741e-4 days 0.0228 hours 1.35582e-4 weeks 3.1201e-5 months of unavailability for each diesel generator.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Ronning Adverse Trend: None 25

~

-v April 1992 Outstanding MWOs O May 1992 Outstanding MWOs June 1992 Outstanding MWOs 300- July 1992 Outstanding MWOs 200 -

.h.

a fj >

100- %2 m

$ N m h5h h h -~~~

0

3 3

g 7

2 i 0 3 Months 3 6 Months G-9 Months 912 Months >12 Months AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS 5

(CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the age of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders (MWOs) remaining open at the end of the reporting month.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson! Bobba Adverse Trend: An adverse trend is indicated based an increasing values for three consecutive months for outstanding MWOs 9 - 12 months old, This trend is due to the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage during February, March and April.

April 1992 400 -

0 May1992 350 - ':

O Ane1992

O hly 1992 300 - ,

lb S50 - ;,9 200 - :')

~

150- 'f ' f,f 100-

/. '.

50-T -

'6 i :' l j j . . .. l , ,- J Tota Open MWOs Open MWOs>3 Total Open Safety .Open Safety Open High Priority months old Related MWOs Related MWOs > 3 MWOs Months Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE)

Th?s indicator shows the total number of corrective non-outage MWOs remaining open at the end of the reporting month, along with a breakdown by several key categories.

The number of open MWOs >3 months old increaseu during March and April because on-line activities had to be scheduled beyond the end of the Cycle 14 Refuelir2 Outage.

l

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson! Bobba Adverse Trend: None l

SEP 36 27

Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old 80% . IGOODI i +

Cycle 14 Refuehng 60 % -. Outage

~

l -

, s.

40% - , w

+;

p , ; s 20% - p- -

L ';;; ~- ,

Y s . ,

0%

Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb ' Mar Apr May Jun Jul92

'Programmate change to re!!ect change in non-outage cntena.

CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the percentage of open corrective non-ouw; .naintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of the reponing month.

The percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of July 1992 was reported as 56.3%.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 28

O Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance

-O- 1991 & 1992 Fort ca!houn Non-Outage Goals Cycle 14 Refueling l GOOD l 90% - Outage 80% -

70% -

60% -- C O O O Y 50% -

'""~ '

40% -

30% -

. o 20%

Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE ,

a This indicator shows the ratio of completed nori-outr e preventive maintenance to total >

completed non-outage maintenance.

The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 41.6% in July 1992.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to attain a ratio of preventive to total maintenance non-outage greater than 65% The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal was to attain a ratio of preven-tive to total maintenance greater than 60%.

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend. None SEP 41 3

--- - ~ ~

4 % -- O Preventive Maintenance items Overdue j jGOODl

-@ 1991 & 19s2 Fon Calhoun Goals k 3%- _

J 2%-

Cycle 14 Refueling Outage 1%- C O -- O ~6 i

g I

b h g m

o 9

i hd ~h ..

Augst Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 l

PREVENTIVE MAINTEN ANCE ITEMS OVERDUE f The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the administration and execution j of preventwe maintenance (PM) programs. A srnali percentage of preventive mainte-l nance items overdue indicates a station commitment to the preventive maintenance program and an ability to plan, schedule, and perform prevent;ve maintenance tasks as programs require.

During July 1992,570 PM items were completed.1 PM item (0.17% of the total 570) was not completed within the allowable grace period.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 0.5% per month of the preventive maintenance items overdue. The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal was to have less than 1% per month of the preventive maintenance items overdue.

Data Source: Patterson/Brady (Manager / Source)

Accountabilits - Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 41 N

l

O c Control Reom instruments Repairable On-Line O Totai number of contici soora instruments out.or. service

-t

( 50 -

-O- 1991 S ? 992 Fort Calhoun Goals For Total Out-of Serv;ce Instroments 40-t 30 -

t E. -

F h

1-20-h lf}

wn N$

w

.x,,%

s

..;J-MP~M m St- 'lu,;-Md'$ :6 O- r cH Fi v O 10- N '/

- ?4 E l' ' lMi $gl 7[ W i i

',t

.'< J ,

sc$'

c

$$;l

>/ /

..9

.[hl E@

c,

[2

wA

? ,

ly c'l*

3 -

l

,2c l

i

J. z +

c n/ , < >1 s. ; ;

0 -- //n.- , , cm , L':6 a c%n. +:n / //u y i L'

, ,, / w,:

.I 7- , , ,t.s , , , , ;

I Aug91 Sep CMt Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 i l

NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS .

l This indicator shows the number of out of-service contrul room instruments, the nuinber of instruments repairable during plant operations (on lice), and the 1991 and 1992 Fort i Calhoun goals. '

There was a total of 10 out-of-service control room instruments at tho end of Juiy 1992. 4 of these instruments require a plant outage to repair.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 13 out-of-service control room instru-ments. The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal was to have less than 14 out-of-service control room instruments.

Data Source: Patterson/Spilke r (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Positive Trend 31 I

_ - - _ _ _ _ - - . - 1

Maintenan::e Overtime j 80% -

MOOD l

-X- 12 Month Average Main 9 nance Omrtime i ,

Y l

'70% -

l

--O - 1991 & 1992 Fort Cathe.un "On Line" Goats l

60% - l Cycle 14 !

Re'veling 50%--

Outage l

J

40% - _

j 30%-

. O O--O - D--O ~

20%- \

i , # X .X - E 4

y h'% -

x y x w_ g D-V f_ O--O ,

I' I I 0%

l Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun JC92

) Malt 4TENANCE OVERTIME The Mainter.ance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired mainte-nance activities with the allotted resourcos. Ex^essive ovartime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue.

l The percent of overtirne hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 22.8 %

, during the month of July 1992. The 12 month avera0e percentage of overtime hours-l with respect to normal haurs was reported as 17.2%.

l

[ The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for the "on-line" percentage of maintenance overtime hours l worked is a maximum of 10%.

r I

! Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) 1 l Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: None l

32 l

I

O open :ns ne:ateo to tne use . ,>rocedures <uaintenance>

0 ciosed ins neiated to the use t. > ocedures (Maintenance)

O Procedura1 Noncomphance irs (Maintenance)

Cycle 14 Refuehng 10-Outage 7

6

~

5 5- -

4 3 3 2 2 2 2 000 0

, 1 1 1 1 11 1 .

] 1 1 1 0

0 0 0 l 0 0 0 0 l00 00 0 i i i i i i i i i i i i Aug91 Sep Oct Nov D' Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 PROCEDUR AL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of open Maintenance incident Reports (irs) that are related to the use of procedures, the number of closed irs that are related to the use of procedures, and the number of open and closed irs that received procedural noncom-pliance cause codes.

There was one procedural noncompliance incident (IR 920492) for maintenance re-s ported for the month of July 1992. The incident occurred when fitters PMT'd the three valves on MWOs 913990,920380 and 920381. They completed the PMT " Testing Performed" area of the MWOs but did not complete the PMT sections of the attached procedures.

Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager /Sourc;)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: Norie SEP 15,41 & 44 m

l 1

. _ _ - - - _ - - - - . . _ . . _ . - ~ . - - _ - . - - . _ - - - - . . _ _ .

I 2

800- O Open MWOs

--O-- 1991&1992 Port Calhoun Goals ,

600- Cycle 14 Refueling -

Outage C O-----C O 432 400 -

=

389 5 VM:

380

.- E 394 318 "C M D -

M -

Y 271 _

281 r,7 N~

79; gcc yg3 N'?

1 N;gi: Y,[:

%: Nh' yyg h$,,b 9, e

.. , , , , . .%'s 9%' ~~ , ,, 2

, s0 y'g%

.s9 %% - n%: sci,: %9 s% : , ;V : %% ';s . x&: .a = XM;; %% 7# V/c

%% %9. /%/ Mw %%: sm 9% V#i;; : X% dM' %'c?x: %%

200- 2+ n%: Xu? ge Gw :2e %% 24 % 4% an 9; %%:

I'AX M49 Xw:. M% %% . %% 5%'. :/A% %%):: WX': '@#X . %1R

B:7 ,xe Ms. 'My ;%% %% VXV % XM 'V s %%

f,;M,;g ,,7 'ix9 $7e ;ixg .

, ,g,, ;9g.: ; gy. 9,,% g wy,: $, y ya:

?@

a

%y ,- M7:

. g;,

92 y ;9,(<. pg4: MM (,xt %cy 6, s g(e g%:,;

w/,c x. 3g-p;a.

ge

,;g;. gig; pq ww %% , , , .

gg g

pg,g.,

v7c .;i;.g n y,;,

, :s - ,xg %9, :f%: p

?:V- ,,u' . @: wi% Vik g%: i? MW m,/

9 mn w; wn w x,x: A,%,,. p%M:

i o, .

n_w <y,; ri/ ;h;'g% %%;

i i . i . i i i ; i i 1 Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE MAINTENANCE) .

This indicator shows the number of corrective non outage Maintent,ce Work Orders (MWOs) that were open at the end of the reporting month.

The 1992 goal for this indicator is to have less than 350 corrective non-outage mainte-nance work orders remaining open. The 1991 goal for this ir.dicator was to haw less than 450 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining opa Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Pattersor /Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 l

l l '

l 31 I

[] Comp!Oled Scheduled Actwities (EM)

) -e- For Calnoun Goal 100W 90% - ,,,,,,,

c0% - O O h- U Q h 70% - Cycle 14

\ , f 00% -

Outage 50% -- .

40% - ;

30% -

20%- ,

^

( 10W , ,

.. ii i

no; 5/2 5/9 5/10 5/23 5/30 O!G 6/13 0/20 0/27 7/4 7/11 7/10 7/25 8/1 b

PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENAi4CE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENAtJCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance Cativitios as compared to the number of scheduhd maintenance activities concerning Electrical Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

Data for this indicator was not available for the month of July 1992 due to the forced outage from 7/3 through 7/23.

Data for this indicator was not tracked during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. 1 The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%

Eeoortina Month ComJJe12dlcheduled Activities Week 1 NA Week 2 NA Week 3 NA Week 4 NA Data So ;rce: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 35 i

I 1

O Completed Scheduled Activities (PE) l j -O- Fort Calhoun Goni l

100%-

i 90% -

. 80% - D -

6-.

U --

Q - ~U -

O

't 70% - Cycle 14 W '

I" S 0% .. Refuehng i Outage 50% - , 2 ..1 -

4 0% -- - !

30%-

20*,'. -

gi ,

10%-

0% -

5/2 5/9 5/16 6/23 5'30 6!6 -6/13 6/20 -6/27 7/4 7/11 7/16 7/25 8/1 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EQUIPMENT)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concertuag Pressure Equiprnent Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

Data for this indicator was not avadabie for the month of July 1992 due to the forced outage from 7/3 through 7/23.

Data for this indicator was not tracked during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for ibis indicator is 80%. '

Reoortina Month Comp 1gled Scheduled Activities Week 1 NA Week 2 NA Week 3 NA ,

Week 4 NA Data Gource: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accot.qtability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 l

l l

3e :

.- ,, - ,,w,,,.,-ry.--,,..- .., nwn,,nv .e,,,- ,.,,--ww ,- 4 r,..,,-,~,

4 ,

l t

O comnietod scheduled ^ctwit *5 (GM) l I --@ Fort Ca no n Goal 100 % - - -

!- 90%-

h DOW C 5----C C C O 70% - -.

~

, 60%. CyCIO 14

' ~

RefUchng L 50%-

Outage 40% --

10'e'. - ,. ,w

, a 20%-

, 10% - .

3 j 0%

l 5/2 5/9 S/16 b/23 5/30 C/6 C/13 0'20 6/27 7/4 7/11 7/18 7/25 8/1 l

PERCENT OF COMPLETED 3CHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENURAL MAINTENANCE)

}

i This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as l compared to the number of scheciuled maintenance activities concerning General Main-tenance. Maintenance activities loclude MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and

{l i

miscelianeous maintenance activities. #-

l Data for this indicator was not avaliabie for the month of July 1992 due to the forced

! outage from 7/3 through 7/23.

i

! Data for this indicator was not tracked during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

The Fort Calhoun 2.dtion goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reoorting Month Comoteted Scheduled Activities

Week 1 NA Week 2 NA l Week 3 NA l Week 4 NA 1

I l

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 37 i_ . , _ . . _ . . , _ . . , _ . _ _ . . - . _ . _ _ . . . . _ . _ . . _ _ . . . . . . , . _ _ . . __ . _ - . _ . . . _ _ . . _ . . _

)

I

[] Completed Scheduled Actrvities (MM) 100% ~

-C)- Fort Calhoun Goal 90% - -

80% - O -C O Q-- _O--C 70% -

a; Cycle 14 .

+ -

^

60% - Refueling r; 50%-

40%~

30%-

20% -

l 10%- ,

0"/. I 5/P 5/9 5/10 5/23 5/30 6/6 6/13 0/20 0/27 7/4 7/11 7/18 7/25 8/1 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Mechanical Maintenance. Mairitenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

4

, Data for this indicator was not available for tha month of July 199? due to the forced outage from 7/3 through 7/23.

Data for this indicator was not tracked during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

The Fort Calhou:i Station goal for this ind.cator is 80%.

Reoortin[LMonth Comoteted Schedoled Activitig Week 1 NA Week 2 NA Week 3 NA-Week 4 NA l-l Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Marager/ Source)

! Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 33

O Comp!eted Scheduled Actmties (ic) 100%-

90% - 9 -

80*4 - O -

O -

O --

0 -

CP -

Cr 70% - CYCIO '4 ' '

Refueling 60%- Outage o 50%- w 40%-

30% -

) > I 20% -

10% - '

0%

5'2 5/9 5/16 5/23 s/30 G/6 Gi13 0/20 6'27 7/4 7/11 7/18 7/25 8/1 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Instrumenta-tior. & Centrol. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibratiens, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

Data for this indicator was not available for the month of July 1992 due to the forced outage from 7/3 through 7/23.

e Data for this indicator was not tracked during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reoorting Month Comoteted Scheduled Activities Week 1 NA Week 2 NA Week 3 NA Week 4 NA Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 m

1

l l 3-1 i

O Number of Missed STs Resulting in LERs 2 --

5 1-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i i i O- , ; i i , , , ; , , , ,

'90 '91 Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS This indicator shows the number of missed Surveillance Tests (STs) that result in Lic-ensee Event Reports (LERs) during the reporting month. The graph on the left shows the yearly totals for the indicated years.

During the month of July 1992 there were no missed STs that resu'ted in LERs.

The 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun goals for this indicator are zero.

Data Source: Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 ,

t

40-l -m- Componont -w Application -e T ot al

]

3o.

g PG- %, ~,. ,g _e_ _4 ._. , A 'N j 20 k yM d \__..%

5 n-so- g ' N E j m-m-m ..

_ ,- e " " *

.-m-m-m.

/ r*

F01 M A M J J A tl C N O JW2 F M A M J J92 O waar out'^o'no O other ouvices a uu,viaciunna neoci a umnmnanco tosong r

to o V~

O Enwnearigo Doson O trror

/

/. /A 2o%

g W

3 , o%

<a 90 6t t i j if dh. yto%

COMPONENT FAILURE ANALYSIS REPORT (CFAR)

SUMMARY

This indicator shows the number of items with high failure rates for the 18 months from February 1991 through July 1992. The top chan illustrates the component, application and total failures for each nonth in the 18 month time period. The lower chart depicts the breakdown by cause categories (see the " Definitions" section of this report for de-scriptions of these cause categories) for each type of failure for the reporting month.

The " component" portion of this indicator tracks the number of component categories (i.e. reciprocating pumps, feedwater pumps, motor operated valves, etc.) in whicn the Fort Calhoun Station has a higher f ailure rate than the res; of the industry. For the month of July, this value is 12.

The " application" portion of this indicator tracks the number of application categories (i.e. charging pumos, feedwater pump discharge valves, etc.)in which the Fort Calhoun Station has a higher failure rate than the rest of the industry. For the month of July this value is 10.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/ Dowdy Adverse Trend: An adverse trend is indicated based on three consecutive months of increasing values for application and total failures. This trend is due to failures found during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. The figures have it' creased for the last 3 reporting months because INPO requires approximately 3 months for auditing and processing of failure reports.

41 j

- - - _ -- . - - - - =_ _ - . .

l l

1

-W- Greater Than One Faduro I 40- --+- Greater Than Two Failures

' " # ""' S 35-30-E' N 25- a e0 - -

1' e.

9/

10 -- N\ ?

'- ^

^

? ?" ~ ' 'N ,

% -O O S O O

'O% .

-O'4.

o , , , , , , , , , , q Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 NUMBER OF NPRDS MULTIPLE FAILURES This indicator shows the number of multiple NPROS reportable failures over the preced-ing eighteen months sorted by component manufacturer and model number. The indica-tor is divided into three parts: rnanufacturer model numbers with more than one failure in eighteen months, manufacturer model numbers with more than two failures in eigh-teen months, and rnanuf acturer model numbers with more than five failures in eighteen months.

During the past eighteen months, there were 30 model types that had more than one failure in eighteen months. 9 of these had more than two failures. 4 component types, General Electric 50-570-01 power supplies, Gaulin P18 pumps, Byron Jackson 28RXL pumps and Jayco incorporated 150 valves had more than five failures. The model types with mcre than two failures are: the OSPDE (3 failures), General Electric 50-570 power supplies (4 failures), General Electric 60-5'70-01 power supplies (10 failures), Faulk Type Y couplings (3 failures), Byron Jackson.28 RXL pumps (7 failures), Gaulin P18 pumps (8 failures), Jayco incorporated 150 valves (6 failures), Norgren 11-024 0 valves (3 failures) and Copes Vulcan D-100 60 valves (3 failures).

l l Increases in the number of model numbers with more than one f ailure is mostly due to i failures found during the Cycle 14 Refueling Ontage.

l Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/ Dowdy Adverse Trend: None j

-.--- Components With More Than One Failuro WOT)B

-X~ Components With More Than Two Failures 20~

1s-t o -.

5-y N X o -

Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb (Aar Apr May Jun Jul92 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The Maintenance Effectiveness indicator was developed following guidelines set for1h by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Opera-tional Data (NRC/AEOD). The NRC/AEOD is currently developing and verifying a j maintenance offectiveness indicator using the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) component failures.

This indicator has been revised to show the number of NPRDS components with more than one failure during the last eighteen months and the number of NPRDS compo- :

nents with more than two failures during the last eighteen months. The number of NPRDS components with more than two failure: in an eighteen month period should ;

indicate the effectiveness of plant maintenance. (This change applies only to

! the September 1991 through July 1992 data. The data for August 1991 is based on a twelve month interval.)

l During the last 18 reporting months there were 18 NPRDS components with more than 1 failure. 3 of the 18 had more than two failures. The tag numbers of the components with more than two failures are B/PO-905, CH-1 A and CH 18.

The increase in the number of components with more than one failure is mostly due to .

failures found during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverso Trend: None 43

,, . .- . -, . . - . - . _ - - . . . _ . ...,..- ~ , - . -,. - .,

10 10- .

Calcu!ated Check Valve Failure Rate per MAon Component Hours 9-

-t Industry Che k Va!ve Failure Rate per M.I: ion Component Hours 8-i -O-- Fort Calhour Goal 7-IGOODI 6- p 9 5_

IU 4-3- g ,

g g4g 2- O C O -O- O C C C O-C C C 1 1

- .... 1_

< i 4 4 0 -

'89 '90 '91 Aug91 Sep Oct tJov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju!92 Cheer. Va!vo Failures CHECK VALVE FAILURE R ATE This indicator shows the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate, the Fort Calhoun goal and the industry check valve failure rate. This rate is based upon failures during the previous 18 months. The check valve failures at Fort Calhoun Station for the previous three years are shown on the left.

The data for the industry check valve failure rate is three months behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the data.

For April 1992, the Fort Calhoun Station reported an actual check valve fa: lure rate of 6.19 E-7, while the industry reported an actual fanure rate of 2.86 E- 6. At the end of July 1992, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a calculated eneck valve failure rate of 6.19 E-7.

The 1992 Fort CalhLun goal for this indicator is a maximum failure rate of 2.00 E-6.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Rollins

, Adverse Trer.d: None SEP 43 l

4.t

_ ,. . _ . ~ _ . ., , _ _ _ , - ___ _ , _ _.._..-.._..._._. _ . - . _._.

_ _ . _ . _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ . . . _ _ . m.___... . . _ _ - _ . _ _ . _ - ._ . . . _ . _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ .

i O seconrJary system cpi !

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal pts) 1995 If JPO Industry Goal (0.30) 15, l Secondary System CPI Limit P

-D-- Industry Upper 10% (0.20) 1- . : i l l l l l l Cycle 14 Refuchng o.s ~

o as ~ou O-U-o-o-o-o Ou' age U-5 o b": b b7 b : b br b:b

~~~ ~

b I ' '

i i i0 -

"

Aug91 Sep Oct rJov Dec Jan Feb M ar Apr May Jun Jul92 r 5%-

O % of Hours Chemis.ty is Out !de 00 Guidehnes 3%- Cycle 14 Refuchng Outage 0.,

~

r-'"1 i i

, i i

r-1 i

M,M i i i i ri i i i Aug91 Sep Oct flov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY The top graph, Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (cpl), is calculated using the following three parameters: cation conductivity in steam generator blowdown, -

sodium in steam generator blowdown, cnd condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen. The bottom grech shows the percent of total hours of 13 parameters exceed-ing the Owners Group (OG) guidelines during power operation.

The CPI was reported as 0.557 for the month of July 1992. The percent of hours outside the OG guidelines was reported as 0.03% for the month of July 1992.

l The 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun goals for the CPI are OAS. The INPO 1995 Industry goalis 0.30. The industry upper ten percentile value for this indicator was approxi-mately 0.20 for 1991.

Data Source: Franco /Glar.tz (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Patterson/Schmidt Adverse Trend: None 45

10%- -

O Pnmary System Chemistry Percent et Hours Out of Limit

-(>- Fori Calhoun Goal (p;, .

4%-

Cycle 14 2% .- C G --O O O-..f Refuehng Outage C O O F

05/

Aug91 Sep Oct Nov -Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May _Jun - Ju192 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit indicator tracks ths mary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters ,,e cally, lithium is the parameter that is out of limit.100% equates to all six parameters being out of limit for the month.

The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 1.06% for the month of Jt'ly 1992.

A plant cutage in November and December 1990 resulted in a higher percentage of- ,

hours out of limit.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicatoris a maximum of 2%. The 1991 goal was

- a maximum of k%

Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Smith Adverse Trend: None 2

4

10%-

O % of Hours Auxiliary System (CCW) Chemistry is Outside Station Limits 8%- -O- 1991 Industry Upper Quartile >

} 6%-

i i

! 4%-

i i

j Cycle 14 Refueling i 2%-

Outage 4

o n C O O O

O

i i io% , , , , , , , , , , , __3 l '89 '90 Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 l

, AUXlLIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUTSIDE -

STATION LIMITS The Auxiliary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the station chemistry limit.

The auxiliary system chemistry percent of hours outside station limits was reported as 0.0% for the month of July 1992. The last out of station limits condition occurred in June 1991 and was due to a low nitrite levelin CCW coolant.

The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator was a maximum of 2%.

Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Smith Adverse Trend: None 47

_.. ., , _ _ - - , . _ _ . , , . , , . _ , , _ _ . . - . . . _ . _ . . . _ _ . ~ , . . . - . _ . _ _ . _ . . . _ _ _ . _ . . . . . , . _ . - . _ -

~

Nurnber of Instruments Out of Service 26 -O- Fort Calhoun Goal 24 24 24 - , p 22 -

20 M 20- 18 7% L'pI .N 18- 17 - m $

16 - E w

15 15 15 $ n

'M' i M N :<,y 14 - - ,, - 7%

a w: n & n :e; 12-10~ *

$ $i $n

4 E

M+

M M N x

n*h u m n 4 n &* yfi;;

8- 6 6 x x 2

xs a# k

w M n

d m

6-4-

h w

y x

Q y-Q w a Q w Q

w Q

n Q-Q k w Qw Q

z$

% w /.x ; ",, % m s :n W lw: & M :9,9 2~

0-Ri N

?

,?$.

'?

W W W % l$ $

, ; ; , i

?,$I i i Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT OF SERVICE This indicator shows the total number of in line chemistry system instruments out-of-service at the end of the reporting month. The chemistry systems involved in this indi-cator include the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS),

At the end of July there was a total of 24 in line chemistry instruments out of service.

Of these 24 instruments,20 were from the Secondary System and 4 were from PASS.

The number of PASS instruments out of-service is decreasing because of repair of the ion chromatograph and correction of a pH analysis sequence error. The entire second-ary panelis considered out-of service because failure of the data logger and the Al 25 alarm card not being in place.

The increase that occurred after November 1991 in the number of Gecondary instru-ments out of service is due to a new method of determining if an instrument is out of service The entire instrument channel is considered inoperative if: 1) the instrumcat is inoperative,2) the chart recorder associated with the instrument is inoperative. 3) the alarm function associated with the instrument is inoperative. This change was made because if any of the functions named above are not operational, then the instrument is not performing its intended function.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in line chemistry system instruments that are out-of service has been set at 6. Six out of-service chemistry instruments make up 10% of all the chemistry instruments that are counted for this indicator.

Data Source: Patterson/Renaud (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None 48 i

I

__ _-_____ _-_ ______ - _ ______ -__-_ _ - _ _ _ . a

@ 'Iotal Waste Produced (Kilograms)

- Federal & State Monthly L.imit (Kg) 1000-800-600-4 400 -

200 - 154.5 150 155 5 %%7 5 0 0 0- 0 Yhih

%%% 0 0 %%% 0 0 %%% 0 0 ; , , , , , , , , , , ,

Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED This indicator F'.ows the total amount of hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun each month. ',his hazardous waste consists of non halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced.

During the month of July 1992,0 (zelo) kilograms of non halogenated hazardous waste was produced, 0 (zero) kilograms of halogenated hazardous waste was produced, and 0 (zerc) kilograms of other hazardous waste was produced.

The amount of halogenated hazardous wasta increased in December 1991 because of a change in the method of record keeping, Hazardous waste is no longer counted on a monthly basis. It is counted based upon a full drum of waste.

Date Source: Patterson/Henning (Managor/ Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Henning Adverse Trend: None 49.

Highest Exposure for the Month (mrem)

O Highert Exposure for the Quarter (mrem)

Q Highest Exposure for the Year (mrem) 1 5000--

OPPD 4500 mrem /yr. Limit 4000-300n' J

2000-1707

%%Tg kp(Qb'g phyh ?kW; 1000-thepFWugh a nttGQyQW 206 260 w l lwmmwwnun>

(i%qp$@h%wge$

n r32 luda%c 9_

July MAXIMllM INDIVIDUAL R ADIATION EXPOSURE During July 1992, an individual accumulated 266 mrem which was the highest indi-vidual exposure for the month.

The maximum individual exposure to date for the third quarter of 1992 was 266 mrem.

The maximum individual exposure reported for the year 1992 was 1,707 mrem.

The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem /

year. The 1992 Fcrt Calhoun goalis 1,500 mrem / year.

Date Source: PattersonAVilliams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trond: None l

, 50 1

. . . - . . - - - . . . - . . _ - . . _ = _ . . . . _ . . - . _ __. _. .-.- .-. . . . - - .. . . . - _

a d

I O Monthly Personnel contarninations Cumulative Personnel Contaminations lGOODl 1 300- O- Fort Calhoun Annual Coal (144) 4 i

1 250 - Cycle 14 237 Refueling

" 9

t

?!!$$l MM?: 200-

/

! E4 i ZM y %w

Ibf; 150 -

l E'03! O-- O-- - --O--C O O O O O---C O

! Ms I

i h@$

% 101 f/ 77 50-hk ,/ l '

25 24

$ 5 5

y.~ hfY c .: ' " ' I '

i i i 0 'i i i i i i i e i i i i j '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sao Oct Nov Doc 92 ,

i

TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS i

l This indicator shows the number of skin and clothing contaminations for the reporting l month. A total of 248 contaminations have occurred during 1992. There were 24 con-taminations during July 1992.

i There was a total of 55 skin and clothing contnminations in 1991.

There was a tctal of 237 skin and clothing contaminations in 1950.

L The 1992 goal for skin and clothing contaminations is 144, Data Source: PattersonAVilliams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverso Trend: None SEP 15 & 54 1

51

_.. . .. . - . . . ~ .. .- - - .-

g O Decontaminated Rad ion Controlled Area 100 % - GOOD --O- Fort Calhour Goal (non-oulage months) l Cycle 14 Refuehng 90%- - - - - - Outage 3, =- v f C C- O O g

o. _._

e __

.o o __ g

~

x; , . it a 80%- '

m

^

A .

e

..,. v- .

m I 70% - ..', ,-

w .

b

'f,' s !'

60% -

N C

q i #

3 50% - J- '

Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA This indicator shows the percentage of the RCA that is decontaminated (clean) based on the total square footage, a 1991 Fon Cah an goal of 85% decontaminated RCA for non outage months and a 1992 goal of 88% Montaminated RCA for non outage months.

At the end of the reporting month,87% of the tota: square footage of the RCA was decontamiriated.

Date Source: Patterson/Gundal (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/l.ovett Adverse Trond: None SEP54 52

i O Numbor of Idontified PRWPs Bo-I

Cycle 14 l j 70- Refueling i j Outage i 6o-

} 'M i

U$

j s0- y el lb1?

l 4o- M 3 m

%4

! !h hl

]

30- [y y/%

g ya j

{,)) 9%!

15 $

) ~

h) h 11 3 4 9 f

' 3 A

2 M

2 .. .

m 32

'2 m'

' 3 3 h) o i i . i i 6 4 i 4 i i i Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 l RADIOLOGICAL WORK PR ACTICES PROGRAM i

l The Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor Radio-

! logical Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reponing month. The

!- PRWPs are identified through a review of the monthly Radiological Occurrence Reports. ,

and Personnel Contamination Reports.

I l l The number of PRWPs which a.J identified each month should indirectly provide a

means to qualitnUyely s3sess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological i gerformance, t

During the month of July 1992,11 personnel contamination based PRWPs were identi-

, fied. This number is high due to the forced outage from 7/3 through 7/23. The numbers of PRWPs for the months of February, March and April are higher than the numbers j reponed for previous months due to the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) ,

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None SEP52 to

O Tota' Number ot not Spots O Number of Aad.t.ona! Hot Spots Id ntified O Remova1 Planned I

--+-- Cumv:ative Hot Spots Removed

~~O- 1992 Fort Camoun Goal for Hot Spots Removed

!l 75-l i -

~

i

)

50-4 25- ,

i 7 7

e p 7 - +? -

:: .- #I # ,

$ O -O y s $ 1 E

z

?!

i O#

i O F 0 . >;

-~O-O-O-n 0 ,

. . , , i i 1 i i ; i Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Occ92 i

NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS This indicator shows the total number of hot spots which have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documented through the use of a hot spot identification sheet. A hot spot is defined as a smalllocalized source of high radiation. A hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or piece c' equipment is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate and the item or piece of Equipment's dose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour.

At the end of July, there were 68 hot spots identified. 33 of these hot soots were con-

{ sidered permanent, i.e. hot spots which are not significant dose contributors or are cost prohibitive for removal. 7 hot spots, all related to the movement of water in the shut-down cooling system, were removed during the month, 2 new hot spots were ideMified during the month.

Removalis planned for 17 hot spots.12 hot spots are still under evaluation.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to remove one hot spot per month.

1 Data Source: Pattersor Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None 54

O Month!y Rad.ca:t:ve Gas Discharged (Curies) u awe Radca:Lv0 Gas Escha'ged (Cum) 500 -

ES Cumulat;vo Annua! Goal (Curies)

-O-400 -

358 O-O O O O O-O-O O-O O O 300 -

E b

j 200 -

j q' +

8 100- , ,;s '

$f ws

< w ws; 1 I i i 0 i , , , , , , , , , , ,

'90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec92 GA3EOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT.

The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for Janu-ary 1,1992 through June 30,1992. A total of 140.7 curies have been released to the environment during this time, The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1992 is 340 curies for this indica-tor, The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.

Data Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)

. Accountability: Patterson/Trausch Adverse Trend: None et3

O Monthly Ramon01 ve Uquid Dischrif ged ,

Cumulat:vo Haeca:t.10 uqwd D.stnyged

--O- C smwatso AnnualGoai l

I GOODI l 250 - Y 228 1 0 -O - O O-O-O-O O O O O-O 200--

1 175 170 l 150--

C b

100-i 50 -

15.7 3.2 0.7 74 l 0 o_4' '"' M 1

'- '-MM 3 4 I I I i i I e i i i 4 1 i }

'89 '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Aor May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec92 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE DEING DISCHARGED TO THE Ei1VIRONMEi1T The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for January 1,1992 through June 30,1992. Ti.e liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the i environment from all sources totaled 39.5 curies during this time.

l The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1992 is 225 curies.

The liquid radioactive waste being discharged .o the environment is calculated every six months.

! Data Source: France!Krist (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse ~ rend: None E6 l

l l ., , . - - - - - - . . _ _ . _ . - - -

Non System Fadum lGOODI 30- -

y 25-20- 17 l 14 !

15- _

10- 8 7

~

- 6 5 -- 2 3 .

I ' ' ' '

0 i i r i i i i 4 i i <

Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 GODDl x System Fahres i 80- 73 Y 70 - P 60- M M 52 50 - M gy 43 g 40-30- '#

W EW

7 33 28 29 20-10- y

ffff f'k f'f h

hhM E E j;g g g# wp g y 0 -- , , , , , , ; , , i ,

Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 LOGG AB LE/REPOHTAB LE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)

The Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) Ind;cator is depicted in two separate graphs. The top graph depicts the total number of loggable/ reportable non-system l failures concerning Security Badges, Access Control and Authorization, and Security l

Force Error, and Unsecured Doors. The bottom graph shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning system failures which occurred during the reporting month.

During the month of July 1992 there were 32 loggable/ reportable incidents identified.

System failures accounted for 29 (91%) of the loggable/ reportable incidents, and 10 (34%) of these were environmental failures. The multiplexer failure and computer failure occurred during a heavy electrical thunderstorm on July 22,1992. Also, several environment failures and system failures occurred as a result of the storm.

Data Source: SefickiWoerner (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sefick Positive Trend SEP 58 57

- - . . . . _ . . . . - . __ - . . - - - - . _ . - _ ~ - . . - . - . _ _ . . - - . . - - - .

5 O Apra 92 T

'b f.iay '92 2 25 -

fe C Jur,e '92

! E O July '92 l .g 20 -

f 4 &

i E

g 15 .

s o--

b $

) 310-9

fa

! W h 5- 3 l 2 2 , 2 i p 1 1 1 1 1 80 e

I I i

I I 4 i j C Badges Access Control Security Force Error Unsecured Doors I SECURITY NON SYSTEM FAILURES i

This indicator shows the number of loggable/ reportable non system failures for the reporting month. These items include: Security Badges, Access Control and Authoriza- :

j tion, Security Force Error, and Unsecured Doors.

Non-System Failures Number of incidents

Julv '92 June'92 i

i Secunty Badges 2 3 I

l Access Control and Authorization 1 0 I

l Security Force Error 0 1

Unsecured Doors Q 1 i Total 3 5 i

Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sefick Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 58 l

i

O Environmental O Failure I GMD l 20-15 --

10- 7 7 5- 4

-- 3 0 i Aiarms CCTV computer search Equipment Doors O 1991 system Failures D 1992 System Failures [ g@p l 100-82 ,, 84 80- -

73 m

2 -

yo G3 g7 61 58 6% N r 5"6 52 53 53 3 1 43 - -

42 40- ..

j' g :jiy 33 28 29 20- 5 5 q r

~'

4:

0 g; -

.: h;

{5 s 'y 3 1 , , , , , 3 Jan fob Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES T: s indicator shows tne number of loggable/ reportable system failures for the reporting month. These items include: Alarm System Failures, CCTV failures, Security Computer Failures, Search Equipment Failures and Door Hardware Failures. Alarm systems and CCTV failures will be divided into two categories: environmental failures and failures as defined in the performance indicator definitions. Also, the 1991 and 1992 System Failures will be compared on a monthly basis.

System that of Inci1qnis hjyd2 Ane'92 Envirors Failures Environs failures Alarms 7 5 7 10 CCTV 3 7 1 2 Computer N'A 4 N/A 3 Search Equipment N/A 1 N!A 3 Door Hardware [1% 2 ti% 2 Totals 10 19 8 20 Data Source: Sefick/Woerner(Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sefick/Patterson Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 59

- _~

i 10%~

f O Amount of Work On Hold A,vaiting Parts l 9%-

--O- 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals I 8% -- ._,

l 7% -

6% -. Cycle 14 Refue!!ng 5%- Outage l 4%-

c c a o o o - {> c o o o a 3%-

2% -, -

> ~

, 1%-

u

{# ;

'"5 y ' .1 -. . .- ,.

~

a , x .M 0% --

Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING P ARTS (NON OUTAGE)

This procuremer'. indicator displays the percentage of open, non outage maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total amount of open, non outage mainte-nance items.

There was a total of 899 open, non-outa 's maintenance work orders (MWOs) with 18 (2%) of these MWOs on hold awaiting parts at the end of the reporting month.

The 1991 and 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals for this indicator are to have less than 3.5% of the total number of open. non outage MWOs awaiting parts.

Data Source: Wilfrett/ CHAMPS (Manager / Source)

Accountability: WillretvFraser Adverse Trend: None 1 m i

l l

j i

j; 20-l i - Spare Parts inventory Value ($ Milhon) i l 15- _

\

j 10-4 l 5-l l ,0 i i , , , , , i , i i i S

Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May kn Ju!92

) SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE l The spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of July 1992 was ,

reported as $12,599,938.

~

l l Data Source: Steela/Huliska (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Willrett/McCormick j Adverse Trend: None i

l

~

Spare Parts issued ($ Thousands) 800- __

600 -

I

' k 400-200-0 , , , , , , ,

l Aug92 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 i

SPARE PARTS ISSUED i

Data for the month of July was not available at the printing c' the draft of this report.

The value of the spare parts issued during July 1992 totaled S198,959.01.- The value of-the spare parts issued for November and December 1991 was not available due to a printer problem.

Data Source:- Steele/ Miser (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Willrett/McCormick Adverse Trend: None 61

l i !

i O invorcory Accuracy i

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal (98%) l

- - l j 100% - = 7' ,

j Q

^

O-CP -0,-O-V-O O O 'O l Q.

g s $ il "

n:.

p

, 95% - g s e a g g _ y j b p +

EE $ f M N Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92

! INVENTORY ACCURACY i

l This indicator shows the accuracy of the actual parts count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in the MMIS computer system for the reporting month.

! During July,694 different line items were counted in tne warehouse Of the 694 line l items coun:ed,6 items needed count adjustments. The inventory accuracy for the i month of July was reported as 100%. The Fort Calhoun 1991 & 1992 goals for this ,

l indicator are 98%.

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager /Scurce) l Accountability: Willrett/McCorm!ck Adverse Trend: None l O % of Pick Tickets Generated When Parts are not Available. etc.

7% -- --O- Fort Calhoun Goal 0% - -

5%-

4%-

9_h_

p p 4 y _

f y

q ' O--O--C T

O O O- O q 7 p gg g l Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 l STOCKOUT RATE This indicator shows the percentage of the numbe.r of Pick Tickets generated when the amount of parts requested is aqual to or less than the minimum stocking level and parts are not available.

l .

During July 1992, a total of 1,245 Pick Tickets were generated. Of the 1,245 Pick Tickets generated,- 4 Pick Tickets (0.32%) were generated when the amount of parts

requested wms equal to or less than the minimum stocking level and parts were not

!. available. The Fort Calhoun 1992 goal for this indicator is 2.6% and the 1991 goal was. ,

l 2.0%.

l Data ssurce: WJlrett/McCormick (Manager /5ource) i Accountability: Wilirett/McCorm;ck i Adverse Trend: None C2 i

O % of Totai eurenases that cre aped,ted

~O-- 1991 & 1992 Cort Calhoun Goals (0.5%)

4%~ Cycle 1, Refueling Outage

~~~

)

4 3%-

h 2%- j3 1%- -

C O O O-- O ---C O -O-O--O O O 0%i i i , i i U] i r- -- i i i i Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jaa Feb M2" Apr May Jun Jul92 ExFdDITED PURCHASES This indicator shows the percentage of expedited purchases compared to the total number of purchase orders generated during the reporting manth.

During July, thert , a total of 332 purchase orders generated. Of the 332 purchase orders generated, six (1,81%) were expedited purchases. The expedited purchases were for General Electric circuit breakers, Flexitallic gaskets, epoxy paint. ELGAR filters, a Crosby Gage spindle assembly and a Hutcheson Engineering channel ring.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicatoris 0.5% Tha 1991 goal was 0.5%.

The number of expedited pu; chases was above the Fort Calhoun goal during the months of Febajary, March and April 1992 due to the ordering of items related to the Cycle 14 Refuenng Outage.

Date Sxrce: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Willrett/Fraser Adverse Trend: None m

),

i 100-80- '

i 60- 53 l swg-1

':. :e;

20- '

l 13 .,

O ^ ' - -

I i Service invoices COE Invoices rescellaneous

]

! INVOICE BREAKDOWN

! This indicator shows the number of service invoices, COE invoices, and miscellaneous invoices for the month of July 1992.

j Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source) l Accountability: WillretUFraser i Adverse Trend. None Percenta9e of Material Requests for issue with the Request Date the same as the Need Date 100% -

{ -O- 1991 Fort Calhoun Goal 80%-

1 m

N.

7. . . m r 60%- C O O -O O $ 3-.y g" ,

q y, W 7 gg ,

,e m 40%- - _ ,<

V A T'

]l s

7 . ,

e 20% - .z ;

" .s

,, 1~

I

-6, ; ,

M ?

j Aup91 Sep Oc; Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May lun - Jul92 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING This indicator shows the percentage of material requests (MRs) for issue with their request date the same as their need date compared to the total number of MRs for'-

issue for the reporting month. The 1S91 goal of 60% is also shown.

During the month of July, a total of 1,245 MRs were received by the warehouse. Of the l total MRs received by the warehouse,59.28% of the MRs (738) were forissue with I

their request date the same as their need date.

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)

Accountability: -Willrett/McCormick Adverse Trend: None CA

i 500-j O Total Modification Packages Open

+

, 425 425 400 -

f :- - ; ;

4 I

,'- 337 i ?#i e

s < ! ' i 300 - 287

- :' , : .: ; - 277 c , 274 o,0 n

.; a - y _ _ pg h : .. ? . 251

', m ..

} f; ;: -

q: ,

.j i L [/4] . .

$ S

198 200 -

., : s - 189

' '! !@j ;

> p#; - y cg - 179 172 176 173 3: :- ; 2 e 3 -4 -

j j j !' a# 2 $ '

3., '

j.g

!d 5- t R L -

1 ? ': - '

i ! U~

us _.

4 g l' n

,3 2

1

!; '$2! !i: .l % ~ ' + ';9

+ ** +

i i i 199 i i i e i i i i i i i i 3

Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92

~

'68 '89 '90 l OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS This ind;cator shows the total number of outstanding modifications (excluding outstand-i ino modifications which are_prooosed to be cancelled).

~

Categprv _. Reoortina Month

. Form FC-1133 Backlog /in Progress 20 Mod. Requests Being Reviewed 23

. Design Engr. Backlog /In Progress 65 i Construction Backlog!!n Progress 28 Design Enct Uodate Backloatin Progress 37 Total 173

' At the end of July,35 additional modification requests had been issued this year and 18 modification requests had been cancelled. The Nuclear Projects Review Committee

. (NPRC) had completed 109 backlog modification request reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Cornmittee (NPC) had coinpleted 82 backlog modification request reviews this year.

Data Source: Jaworshi/ Turner (Manager / Source)

Scofield/Lounsbery (Manager / Source) i Accountability: Scofield/Phelps Adverse Trend: None 2

i 1

e ,,, ., n ,..n - -

l l

l i

~

Temporary Modifications >1 cycle old (RFO required for Removal) l Temporary Modifications >G months old (Removablo on-hno)

--(~>-- Fort Calhoun Goal for Temporary Modifications >1 cycle old (0) s-5-

! 4- -

l 3 --

.$$.,s$ $.<,

,(,;.,:.

! 2 2 'W" 2-i ... ..

,,..., .: :N:: '

~

. y:. ,

i 1- ' . ,. : :. -:. :': :

v.....

5: .:::

. v. ;. C. : :. ,. ' .

o-o v O:- o .- :' o J.v ' 4-O ,

O--.

May '92 June '92 July '92 l TEMPOR ARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING) l 1-This indicator provides information on the number of temporary modifications greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage (RFO) for removal and the number .

j of temporary modifications removable on-line that are greater than six months old. Also j provided is the Fort Calhoun goal for temporary modifications.

l There are currently no temporary modifications that are greater than one fuel cycle old j requiring a refueling outage to remove. In addition, at the end of July there were_4 l temporary modifications installed that were greater than six months old that can be -

l removed on line. These were: handjack close of CCW/RW valves,in which OPS is reviewing a system engineering suggestion for closure; potable water supply piping temporary repair, which is awaiting completion of MWOs 894520.and 92718, refriger-ated air dryer for Rm. -057 which is awaiting completion of abbreviated modification l MR FC-92-006; and CL 122 vacuum breaker removal which is awaiting parts; MWO-l 922268 is scheduled for 8/17/92 l "

At the end of July, there was a total of 17 TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun Station, 8 of j the 17 installed TMs require an outage for removal 'anc 3 are removable on-line. In 1992 a total of 50 temporary modifications have been installed.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source)

Accountabi!!ty: Jaworski/Gorence l Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 & 71 l L m L

60-May '92 50-0 June'92 40-0 July '92 30-20- - ----

19 3 2 1

o o 1 0 3 0-3 months 3 6 months >6 months System Engineering 60- 8 y'92 50- June'92 44 45 46 43 40- 3s O July '92 . ~~

~

.' ' 30 30- ,: 26 25 L <

p 20 - .

0-3 months ,3-6 months >6 months Design Engineering ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR) BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of EARS assigned to Design Engineer-ing and System Engineering awaiting a technical response fron. engineerino.

At the end of_ July 1992,37 EARS had been resolved and were going through the close-out process. There were 3 EARS awaiting a technical response from Nuclear Projects.

Tota! EAR breakdown is as follows:

EARS opened during the month 17 EARS closed during the month 8 Total EARS open as of the end of the month 181 Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Phelps Adverse Trend: None " 'P 62 4

I

4 A

A i

e 400- '

l ECNs Backlogged in DEN 1

I -

350- O ECNs Opened During the Month ECNs Completed During the Month j 300 -

1 i ,

j 250-

Cycle 14 i Refueling i 200- _ Outage i -

~

j 150 - ,

, + . -

] '

l 100- ,

~

l 7.,

~

y :

-,~ h,, :

-s2

/, -

50- _n:& I -

h [$ -

+ .

-L,E --

_g 7. yt

~

9 .

_:? -

2 x y ;9 . g ..: - i :.

:9 @ 3: :>;.

2 1 -;9 s

& :O %

v t ; "

's 1 ,* 9 g 1 9 - ,,

y 5 n 9 t. :s . y '9 -

.: 9

ff S L'e :? ;. J A : $ -Y O

# # ^-

S+ si

r i 6 1 i i i i i i 1 i j Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec .Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Juf92 i

ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS i This indicator shows the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) awaiting -

completion by DEit the number of ECNs opened during the reporting month, and the l number of ECNs completed by DEN during the reporting month.

At the end of July 1992, there was a total of 169 DEN backlogged open ECN1 There '

! were 45 ECNs opened, and 53 ECNs completed during the month, f Although the number of open ECNs is currently high, activities are in progress to reduce the backlog of open ECNs. It is expected that the number of open ECNs will continue to

! decrease.

l Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/JaworsKi .

l Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 I

)

l 1

, EB

(

I l 1

,, . . - . ,__ , - .,, , _ . . . . - . . , - . - . . . , . _ . . . , - , , - , ,i

DEN Engineering not complete a

O syniem engineering - Engineerina complets, response under review Q Maintenance - MWO scheduled, but work not completo O Maintenance uwo con,piete, awaiting cioseout h

g9 55 21 23 El h, l I 4 _b.. O i

l 1 6 ,, _{ 3 a

l. ggp t

0 - 3 months 3 - 6 months > 0 months ECHEAClLFTY cd6ttGES_OffN O DEN - Engineenng not complete C System Engineering - Engineering complete, response under rovlow C Maintenanco - MWO scheduled but work not complete O uaintenance - uwo compiate. awaiting cioseoui 70 79

( }4 ;] 1 8

M 1 i

i 0 3 months 3 G roonths > 6 monttis ECN.SUBSJJTJ.lTE.PJ.L8'J.ACEMENTJIEMiiDfEN DEN - Engineenng not complete O sysicm eng:noering - waixeewn or contirmation not compiete 70 -

60- 58 50-40 30- 20 22 20- , 11 10-O . lil 9 s 1 p

i 0 - 3 months 3 - 6 months > 6 rnonths ECH.DQCMMENT CBANGES.QEEN ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of Engineenng Change Notices (ECNs) that are assigned to Design Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineedng, and Maintenance for the reporting month. The graphs provide data on ECN Facility Changes Open, ECN Substitute Replacement items Open, and ECN Document Changes Open.

Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Jawors'rJ Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 m

- . _ ~ - - . , . _ . .- . -- .

4 l

i 1992 Rt.cordatelo injury /tliness Frequency Rate S- IGOODl 4.5 -

., -M 1991 Rocordabic injury /fliness Froquency Rate y j <- 1092 .:od Calhoun Goal (2.0) i 4- .--

35- , ,

a- ,f 2.5 - /-

t \ / _ ___

2- O M*.-O--g O- ) O O O O O

1. 5 -

l l 1-j O.5 -

6 4 1 ~9 4 1 & 4 4 1 l 5

} Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun J ul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 92

?

I RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE i

This indicator shows the 1992 recordable injury / illness cases frequency rate. The 1991 recordable injuryAliness cases frequency rate is also shown.

A recordable injury / illness case is reported if Nuclear Operations Division personnel are l injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid. The record-l able injury / illness cases frequency rate is computed on a year-to-date basis.

The recordable injury / illness rate for July 1992 was reported as 3.08. There were three recordable injury / illness cases reported during the month of July. There has been a total of 11 reccrcable injury / illness cases in 1992.

The recoroable injury / illness rate for the past twelve months is 3.23.

i ~

The 1992 goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 2.0.

l Ygar Recor@biq_ Cases - Year-EA1Ratt i 1989 11 2.2 l 1990 11 2.1

, 1991 18 3.3 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Richard

( Adverse Trend: The manager of the Safety Department has stated that. based on this l indicator's 1992 values being above the 5 year average values, an

adverse trend is indicated.

SEP 15,2.5 & 26

! 70 .l

I g O Licensee Event Reports 1

4 2 O Personne! Errors Rapo.1ed in LERs l l Cumulative Licensee Even: Reports i $ 40- ;

--+- Cumu!ative Personnel Errors Repo.1ed in LERs !

l {

i 31 j2.

D 7 29 Y 30-i ;i4'l % - @

, :; 26 L* $

, : c sy t -

20-i

h ! [') [)

jj L( Lj L .j 14

~

l : ! 12 : - i

,i

g- [j :

j h Md lhf 10 ~'

s E M x f

kf 4

s g 5,6 ,i s '

Ci 5

I, a ,

! e i , i0 ,

, ; , , , 3 3 i ,

I '88 '89 90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 P

, NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERS

! This indicator shows the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) submitted during l each month of 1992, the LERs attributed to personnel errors for each month, and the cumulative totals of both. The year end totals for the four previous years are also

shown.

i l In July, there was a total of two LERs reponed; neither LER was attributed to personnel arror.

l

! Data Source: Short/ Lippy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None i

SEP 15 l l

1 71 l

P

- + +y , .-,y ...-,ww.

,,..,-w.--, ~ w - - - -+-ire--r,i

O Administrative Control Problem Licensed Operator Error 5-Other Personnel Error

[] Maintenance Problem 4- ,'

DesigtvConstruction'instaliation/ Fabrication Problem -

i Q Equipment Failures 3- I i

i 2- c - . . . . , .

i l~

1- . ,, . . . ., __. . , --

; ; l.: :

4 : : :

= -

i 0 i i i

~

II

6 i i l i i i i 1 l Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 l

2 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN

, This indicator shows the LERs by report date broken down by Root Cause Code for l each of the past twelve months from August 1,1991 through July 31,1992.

The cause codes are intended to identify possible programmatic deficiencies in order to j be consistent with industry reporting, the Root Cause Codes have been revised to ,

I reflect the NRC's sequence coding. For detailed descriptions of these codes, see the

" Performance Indicator Definitions" section of this report.

l Data Source: Short/ Lippy (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Patterson

! Adverse Trend: None -

l l

l L

-. . . _ _ _ __ .- , . _ . . . . _ ~ -- . . . ~ . . , , ~ .

_ - - . . _ . .= ._ - -

i O Actual Division Staffing i O Authorized Division Staffing 600- 523 533 400-219 226 I 200- '

50 50

' l 0 , ,

r >

Nuclear Operations Production Enginecting Nuclear Services STAFFING LEVEL The authorized and actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions.

a d

i Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Waszak Adverse Trend: None SEP 24 h

-{}-- Nuclear Operations Division Turnover Rate

-A-~ Production Engineerina Division Turnover Rt.te 1

10% -

--O-- Nuclear Services Division Turnover Rate f 8%-

l 6%- 0 0 0

* ~

. u&%

C v v v v v v u-i 0% v O-~

M91 A91 M91 J91 J91 A91 S91 091 N91 D91 J92 F92 M92 A92 M92 J92 J92 i

PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE l The turnover rates for the three Divisions are calculated using only resignations from

} OPPD.

Division Turnover Rate

NOD 2.49 %

l PED 3.65%

l NGD 0.0%

Current y, the OP; J corporate turnover rate is being reported as approximately 2.5%.

This OPPD corporate turnover rate is based on the turnover rate over the last four years.

Data Source: Sorunson/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Waszak Adverse Trend:- None j

Go n O TotM Requalification Training Hours O Simulator Training Hours 53- Non Requahfication Training Hours O Number of Exarn Failures At

~

40-36 36 36 30 30 -

20- -

\U 16

~

14 14 14 10 ~ g -j g i

s

( -

4

~4 4 4 4 v

['

2 g -

2 c 0 , ; ,

i ; 3 Cycle 91-5 Cycle 91-6 Cycle 91-7 Cycle 92-1 Cycle 92 2 Cycle 92 3 Cycle 92 - 4 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING This indicator provides information on the total number of hours of training given to each crew during each cycle. The Simulator training hours shown on the graph are a subset of the total training hours. Non-Requalification Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP verification & vahdation, INPO commitments, GET, Fire Brigade, Safety Meetings, and Division Manager lunches.

, Exam failcres are defined as failuret in the written, simulator, and Job Performance Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training.

The 6 exam failures in Cycle 92-4 are rotational written quizzes. Additionally, one crew failed a weekly simulator evaluation. The individuals who failed the simulator scenario

, were remediated and returned to shift by the end of the requalification week. All of the individuals who failed a written quiz have been remediated, with one exception. That individual is considered acceptable for continued shift operations, but is being remediated in exam taking skills.

Data Source: Gasper /Guliani (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gasper /Guliani Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 74

30- =

< SRO Exams Admiriistered O SRO Exams Passed O RO Exams Administered *-

0 RO Exams Passed 20-

~

,4-q j*

10-

/ m,, 1

~

U __ , I

, -_a k /

0 i r i iW 4 i i i i i i i i Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Opera-tor (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally adminis-tered quizzes and exams ara used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly 3 progress.

During the month of July 1992, there were 5 internally administered SRO exams taken and all of these exams were passed.

Also during July, there were 17 internally administered RO exams given and 14 of these exams were passed.

There were no NRC administered SRO or RO exams curing July.

During the month or June 1992, there were 3 RO and 7 SRO exams administered by the NRC. OPPD was notified in July that all 3 ROs and all 7 SROs passed these ex-ams.

Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gasper /Guliani Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 75

_ _ _ J

{

O 0:ner Training (1000 Hrs.)

Ill General Employee Tra:ning (1000 hrs.)

Technical Suppor 30 Hrs )

4_ O cnemistry ano s.seiation erotection (1000 Hrs.)

Maintenance (1000 Hrs.)

e g Operatioris (1000 Hrs.)

8 a

b M 5 2 ~

5 ? n

~

N g

- 3: r=a .e _

M 3

s :n =

_ z _ _

Im 3

~

0 i ; . i 4 i i- i i 4 i i Jut 91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS This indicator shows the total number of instruction hours for Operations, Maintenance,

, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, Geaeral Employee Training, and Other Training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station, Due to the transition of resporisibilities for training performance indicators, data for the month of May was unavailable for this indicator.

This indicator is normally one month behind the reporting month due to the time re-quired for data collection and processing.

DEPARTMENT June '92 Operations 488 Maintenance - 295 c Chemistry and Radiation Protection 420 Technical Support 90 General Employee Training 136 Other 32 Total 1,461 Data Source: Gasper / Podl (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gasper Adverse Trend: None 76 4

________________________.._...____.__----m _ _ - _ - -

l 1

. l Other Training (1000 Hrs.)

@ General Employee Training (1000 hrs )

30- O Technica! Support (1000 Hrs )

4 O Chemistry and Rad;ation Protection (1000 Hrs ) l 25-e Maintenance (1000 Hrs.)

B ,

$ 20- Operations (1000 Hrs.)

p

, 2 15 -

O h 5-g iO- -

!~

8 E

5-

=

~ 3 E

==

9 nrr

~

= m E I -

m

. _ . . i ~

E -

. I i l t a i i i i i i I Ju!91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDEN T TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Maintenance, Che.Tiistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employe9 Training, and Other Training conducted for the Fort Calhoen Station.

Due to the transition of responsibilities for training performance indicators, data for the

, month of May was unavailable for this indicator.

This indicator is normally one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed to collec t and evaluate the data.

DEPARTMENT June'9 L Operations 2,247 Maintenance 1,070 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 1,271 Technical Support 412 General Emplayee Training 648 Other 32 Total 5,680 Data Source: Gasper /Podell (Manager / Source)

Accc J&bility' Gasper Adverse l rend: None l

77

- : m--

9-

-- Violations per 1,000 inspection Hours

+ Fod CNhoun Goal lGOODI t

e S

j6-l 2 8

h 5

4 8

o

. 3.7 4

! E" ke /

l .'- 2.6 3-

. ; m, 9 W >

. t f l' 3 l

i o o o -c o x o o e a

. .. //g

/

i ! ,9

.gy;.

0

~ ~~

i i i i , , , , , , , , , , , ,

'89 '90 '91 Jul91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 VIOLATIONS PER 1,000 INSPECTION HOURL This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per

{ 1,000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month i d:'e to the time involved with collecting and processing the data.

The violations per 1,000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 3.73 for the twelve rnonths from July 1,1991 through June 30,1992. This increase, which exceeds the

Fort Calhoun goal of less than 1.5, is due to the number of violations issued during this time period in comparison to the relatively low number of inspection hours for this same time period.

l The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal is a maximum of 1.5 viciations per 1,000 inspection hours.

The goal was a maximum of 1.6 violatioris per 1,000 insoection hours for 1991.

l Data Source: Short/ Lippy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Short l \

Adverse Trend: An adverse trend is indicated based on increasing values for four l l

consecutive months.

78 1

l

i i

p- I fA 92@

Fort Calhour J r y n;@;ti-313 Cooper 0.7 i

River Berd 2.38 Commanche Peak 1.3 i

l Wolf Creek 3 i

i Arkansas One 1.S8

{ South Texas 2.61 l Waterford 3.46

05 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Violations per 1.000 Inspection Hours COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV PLANTS i This indicator provides a comparison of violations per 1,000 inspection hours among Region IV nuclear power plants. The data is compiled for a twelve month period from July 1,1991 through June 30,1992.

The Fort Calhoun goal for 1992 is a maximum of 1.5 violations per 1,000 inspection hours. The goal for 1991 was a maximum of 1.6 violations per 1,000 inspection hours.

This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data.

. Data Source: Short/ Lippy (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Short Adverse Trend: None 79 L -

c 25- ' - -

--+- Number of Violations During the Last 12 Months

--Q- Number of NCVs During the Last 12 Months j 20-16 i 15 j 15- 34 l 13p" 10-l 8 j 7 7 7/

5- 4 4 V

I 2 2 2 2 2 /

3 ~4 N3 V N 3

V 3

V V v v /

O ; , ; ; ; , ; 3 , , ,---- ,

Jut 91 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun92 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE-MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) i The Cumulative Violations and Non-Cited Violations (NCVs) indicator shows the cumu-

, lative number of violations and the cumulative number of NCVs for the last twelve

months.

l This indicator is one month behind the repoding month due to the time involved with

! collecting and processing the data fer this indicator.

Data Source: Short/ Lippy (Manager / Source) l l Accountability: Short i

i Adverse Trend: An adverse trend is indicated based on four consecutive months of f increasing values for the number of cumulative violations (twelve l months running total). -

i

4 i.

Total Outstanding CARS 1

) O Outstanding CARS > Six Months Old q Outstanding CARS That Are Modification Related Sb

}

100 - _ _

~

1 ,,,

4 t

t 50- _ _

pl c

~

2 j :

q _.

l_ _

) F s

0 * '

E " '

l Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 i

i OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS l This indicator shows the total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CARS),

i the number of outstanding CARS that are greater than six months old, and the number of outstanding CARS that are modification related.

, At the end of July 1992, there were 72 outstanding CARS,28 CARS that were greater l than six months old, and 2 CARS that were modification related.

Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source) i Accountability: Andrews/Gambhir/ Gates Adverse Trend: None i

i i 1 81 !

1

-- -. -.-. . -- . - -- . . . .~

d -

~

, D NOD Overdue CARS . l 1 15-

O NOD CxRs w,tn extensions oranted l 10-5- 1 2 3

2 3

2 0-- U j Aug91 Sep Oct . ov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul92 20-

,' . PED Overdue CARS 15-1 - PED C ARs With Extensions Granted i 10-

' .6 6 4 4 4 5 - 5 ~

5- -

3 -

2 - -

2 2 '

2 d

OR p- ;'

1 On 0 0 r -

0 0 00 0 (- On l Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju!92 l 20- "

l Other Overdue CARS i 15-I O Other CARS With Extansions Granted

10- 1

! 5-2 3

,M,00 ,M_

1 0 00

, , On,00 OR,00 , ,

00 00 00 l Aug91 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju192 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS

This ind;cato'r shows the number of overdue CARS and the number of CARS which received extensions broken down by organization.

Overdue CARS Overdue CARS May S2 June'92 July 92 l NOD 0 0 0 PED 2 0 0 l

Otners 1 0 1 l

Total 3 0 1 Extended CARS l Extended CARS May 92 June'92 July '92 l -

NOD 1 2 0 PED 5 6 2 Others 1 0 1 Total 7 8 3 l

[ Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Andrews/Gambhir/ Gates

( Adverse Trend: None i

1991 SALP Fudct.

Area CARS Signif. CASs NRC Vio!a_ LERs A) Plant Oper't.ons 30 1 1 6 B) Radiolog. Controls 12 0 3 0 C) Maint' Surveil. 66 0 2 9 D) Emergency 16 0 0 0 Preparedness E) Se;unty 5 0 1 3 F) Engr / Tech Soport 93 3 1 12 G) Safety AssessJ 27 1 1 2 Qual. Verit.

H) Other 0 0 0 0 Total 2 :9 5 9 32 1992 SALP Funct.

Area CARS Signit. CARS NRC Viola, LFRs A) Plant Operations 14 0 0 7 (2)

B) Radiolr.,g. Controls 11 (4) 0 6 0 C) Maint'Survei'. 88 (1) 1 3 7 D) Emergency 4 1 1 0 Preparedness E) Security 8 (2) 0 1(1) 0 F) Engr / Tech Suppon 21 (2) 0 0 10 G) Safety Assess' 16(1) 0 0 0 Qual. Verit.

H1 Other 0 0 0 0 Total 162(10) 2 11 (1) 24 (2)

Note: ( ) Indicate values for the reporting month.

CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIFICANT CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs. LERs REPORTED The above matrix shows the number of Corrective Action Reports (CARS) issued by the Nuclear Services Division (NSD) vs. the number of Significant CARS issued by NSD vs.

the number of violations issued by the NRC for the Fort Calhoun Station in 1991 and 1992. Included in this table is the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) identified by the Station each year. The number of NRC violations reported is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the violations.

Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Short/ Lippy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Andrews/Gambhir/ Gates

/ verse Trend: None SEP 15,20,21 m

400 - Total Outage MWOs --+- Parts Hold i

-O- MWOs Ready to Work -H- Engineering Hold l -V Outage MWR Backlog -M- Flanning Hold I i

300 -

i

! 200 -

1 100-

/

s 0

Jun92 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep93 i

l MWO PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 15 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) that have j' been approved for inclusion in the Cycle 15 Refueling Outage and the number of MWOs

! that are ready to work (parts staged, planning complete, and all other oaperwork ready j for field use). Also included is the number of MWOs that have engineering holds (ECNs, procedures and other miscellaneous engineering nolds), parts hold, (parts I

staged, not yet inspected, pads not yet arrived) and planning hold (job scope not yet comp'eted). Maintenance Work Requests _(MWRs) will also be shown that have been identified for the Cycle 15 Refueling Outage and have not yet been converted to MWOs.

Approximately 2,176 Maintenance Work Orders were completed during the Cycle 14

( Refuel;ng Outage.

l Data Source: Patterson/Clemens (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Johansen i

Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 84 l

l , - _ .,. -

50 - - Tota! Outage Projects

-O- Projects with Prehminary Schedules Submitted

-+- Projects w;th Deta!ied Schedules Submitted '

30-20-10-0 0 0 Jun92 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep93 OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 15 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the status of tne projects which are in the scope of the Cycle 15 Refueling Outage. There are currently 14 approved outage projects.

Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available.

l Data Source: Patterson/Clemens (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Boughter Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 l

es

40- - Total Outage Modifications

.- Mods with Final Design Issued

- Mods Approved for Construction 30 - -+- Mods Ready for Construction 20 -

10 -

+

0 0 3 ,

Jun92 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep93 s

PROGRESS OF CYCLE 15 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING This indicator shows the status of modifications approved for completion during the Cycle 15 Refueling Outage.

The " Mods with Final Design Issued" status indicates that E.iN's work on the modifica-tion is 98% complete. The " Mods Approved for Construction" status indicates that the PRC has approved the final desigri and DEN's work on the modification is 100% com-plete, The " Mods Ready for Construction" situs indicates that the CWOs and proce-dures are complete, and the materialis ready (Construction Management Group's action).

Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes availabic.

Data Source: Patterson/Clemens (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gambhir/Phelps/Faulhaber Adverse Trend: None SEP 31

-r

i l

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTEN ANCE WORK OR- COMPONENT FAILURE ANALYSIS REPORT (CFAR)

DERS

SUMMARY

This indicator tracks the total number of outstanding cor- The number of items for Fort Ca'houn Sta' on with higher rective non outage Maintenance Work Orcers at tna Fort facute rates inan tne rest of the industry for an eightean Calhoun Station versus their age in months. month time perod. Failures are reported as component

(i e. reciprocating pumps motor operated va!ves, etc.)

AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS and apphcation (i e. charg ng pumps, feedwater pumps, j This ind cator is defined as the percentage o' open, non- d:scharge pumps, etc.) categories.

l outage, maintenance work orders that are on hold awa:t- Failure Cause Categories are:

j ing parts, to the tota! number of open, non outage, main- Wear Out/ Aging - a f ailure thought to be the conse-4 tenance work orders. quence of expected wear or aging.

i Manuf acturing Defect - a f ailure attributable to inad-

] AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM equate assembly or imtial quahty of the responsible com-l PERFORMANCE poneni cr system.

] The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) unavail- Engineenng/ Design a failure attributable to the inad-j able hours and the estimated Unavailab!e hears 'or the equate design of the responsible component or system.

i auxihary foedwater system for the reporting pared di- Other Devices - a f ailure attributable to a f ailure or

! vided by the critical hours for the reporting pered multi- miseperation of another component or system, including p!;ed by the NUT.ber of trains in the auxiliary feedwater associated devices.

{ system. Maintenance / Testing - a failure that is a re'sult of im-i proper maintenance or test:ng, lack of maintenance, or AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHF.MISTRY PERCENT OF pmonnel errors that occur during maintenance or test-HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS ing activities performed on the responsible component or The cumulative hours that the Component Cochng Water system, includ:ng f ailure to follow procedures.

system is o tside the staten chemistry limrt The hours Errors failures attnbutable to incorrect procedures that are accumulated from the first sample exceeding the hmit were followed as written, improper insta,lation of equip, until add:tional sampl.ng shows the parameter to be back ment, and personnel errors (including f ailure to follow

within bmits. procedures properly). Also included in this category are i

failures for which the cause is unknown or cannot be as-l CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIFICANT OARS vs. NRC VIO- signed to any of the preceding categories.

LATIONS vs. LERs REPORTED Provides a comparison of CARS issued, NRC volations, CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER l and '.dk *aported. This indicator tracks performance THAW 3 MONTHS OLD

for W m 20 & 21. The percentage of total outstanding corrective mainte-3 rarse items, not requiring an outage, that are greater

CHECK VALVE CAILURE RATE than three months old at the end of the perod reported.

Compares the Fort Calhoun cneck valve failure rate to the industry check valve failure rate (failures per 1 million CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS & NON. CITED VIOLA-component hours). T he data for the industry failure rate TlONS (12 MONTH RUNNtNG TOTAL)

{ is three months behind the PI Report reporting month. The cumulative number of volations and Non Cited Vo-This indicator tracks performance for SEP #43. lations for the last 12 months.

COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT

! Collective rad;aton exposure is the total external whole- This indicator shows the daily core thermal output as i body dose received by all on-site personnel (includrng measured from computer point XC105 (in thermal mega.

contractors and visitors) during a time period, as mea- watts). The 1500 MW Tech Spec limit, and the unmet sured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). Cok portion of the 1495 MW FCS daily goal for tne reporting lective radiation exposure is reported in units of person- month are also shown.

i rem. This indicator tracks radological work performance for SEP #54. DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS) l This indicator shows the number of failures occurnng for COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV each emergency diesel generator during the last 25 start PLANTS demands and the last 25 load-run demands.

Provides data on volatons per 't,000 inspection hours for Region IV nuclear power plants DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY Thrs indicator provides monthly data on the number of j hours of diese! generator planned and unplanned un-l availability.

I 87

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd)

DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA A) A load-run e any duration that resu4s from a real au-The percentage of the Radiation Controned Area, which tomate or manualincitaten.

includes the auxiriary building, the radwaste budding, and B) A load run test to satisfy the plant's load and duration areas of the C/RP building. that is decontaminated based as stated in each test's specificahons.

on the total square footage This indcator tracks perfor- C) Other special tests in which the emergency generator mance for SEP # 54. ' is expected to be operated for at least one hour while loaded with at least 50% of its design load.

DISABLING INJURY FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME 4) Number of Load-Run Fadures: A load-run failure ACCIDENT RATE) should be counted for any reason in which the emer.

This indicator is de'ined as the number of accidents for gency generator does not pick up load and run as pro-all utAty personnel permanently assigned to the station, dicted, Failures are counted during any vahd load.run invohnng days away from work per 200,000 man-hours demands.

worked (100 man years). This does not incluoe contrac- 5) Exceptions: Unsuccessful attempts to start or load run tot personnel. This indcator tracks personnel perfor- should not be counted as vahd demands or illures when mance for SEP #25 & 26. they can be attributed to r ny of the following:

A) Spurious tnps that would be bypassed in the event of DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL) an emergency.

The Document Review Indcator shows the number of B) MMf unction of equipment that is not required during documents reviewed, the number of documents sched- an emergency. .

i uted for review, and the number of document reviews C) htentional termination of a test because of abnormal that are overdue for the reporting month. A document conditions that would not have resu!!ed in major diesef review is considered overdue if ue review is not com- generator damage or repair.

plete within 6 months of the assigned due date. This D) Ma! functions or operahng errors which would have not

, indcator trar.ks performance for SEP #46. prevented the emergency generator from being restarted

{ and brought to load within a few minutes.

EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM E) A f ailure to start because a portion of the starting sys-PERFORMANCE tem was disabled for test purpose, if followed by a suc-The sum of the known (punned and unplanned) unavail- cessful start with the starting system m its normal align.

I.

able and the estimated unavadable hou's for the emer- ne nt.

gency AC power system for the reporting period divided Each emergency generator failure that results in the gon-by the number of hours in the reporting penod multiplied erator being declared inoperable should be counted a~-

) by the number of trains in the emergency AC power sys- one demand and one failure. Exploratory tests dunng

, tem. corrective maintenance and the successful test that 101-lows repair to venfy operability should not be counted as

, EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABIL- demands or f ailures when the EDG has not been de-ITY elated operable again.

Th: s indicator shows the number of failures that were

, reperted dunng the last 20,50, and 100 emergency die- ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR)

sei generate.- demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also BREAKDOWN shown are trigger values wh;ch correlate to a high level This indicator shows a creakdown, by age of the EAR, of

of conf +dence that a unit's dieselgenerators have ob- the number of EARS assigned to Design Engineering

! tained a reliabihty of greater than or equal to 95% when Nuclear and System Engineering. Thia indcator tracks the demand f ailures are loss than the trigger values. performance for SEP #C2.

1) Numher of Start Demands: A!! vahd and inadvertent i

start demands, including all start only demands and all ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) BREAK-start demands that are followed by load run cemands. DOWN whether by automatic or manualinitiation. A statenfy This indicator breaks down the number of Engineering i

demand is a de and in which the emergency generator Change Notees (ECNs) that are assigned to Design l is started, but no attempt is made to load the generator. Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineenng, and

2) Number of Start Failures: Any failure within the emer- Maintenance. The graphs provide data on ECN Facihty j gency generator system that prevents the generator from Changes open, ECN Substitute Replacement Parts achieving specified frequency and voltage is classified as open, and ECN Document Changes open. This indicator I. a vahd start failure. This includes any condition identified tracks performance for SEP #62.

in the course of maintenance inspections (with the emer-gency generator in standby mode) that definitely would ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS have resutted in a start f ailure if a demand had occurred. The number of ECNs that were opened, ECNs that were

3) Number of Load-Run Demands: For a vahd load run completed, and open backlog ECNs awaiting completion demand to be counted the load-run attempt must meet by DEN for the reponing month. This indcator tracks one or more of the following criteria: performance for SEP #62.

88 l

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (cont'd)

EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1,000 CRITI- GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DIS-CAL HOURS CHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT Equipment forced outages per 1000 entcal hours is the This indicator displays the total number of Cunes of a1 inverse of the mean time between forced outages gaseous radioactive nuclides released from FCS.

caused by equ!pment fail s. The mean time is equal to the number of hours the ieactor is cr:ticalin a perbd GROSS HEAT RATE (1000 hours0.0116 days 0.278 hours 0.00165 weeks 3.805e-4 months ) divided by the number of forced cutages G,oss heat rate is defined as the ratio of total thermal caused by equipment f ailures in that perod. energy in British Thermal Units (BTU) produced by the reactor to the total gross electrical energy produced by EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR the generator in kilowatt hours (KWH).

Th!s indicator is defined as the ratso of gross available generation to gross maximum generaton, expressed as HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED a percentage. Available generation is the energy that The total amount (in Kilograms) of non halogenated haz-can be produced if !!<e unit is operated at the maximum ardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other power level permitted by equipment and regulato y limi- hazardous waste produced by FCS eacn month, tatens. Maximum generaton is the energy that can be produced by a unit in a given period if operated continu- HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM ously at maximum capacity. SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) unavaib EXPEDITED PURCHASES able hours and the estimated unavailable hours for the The percentage of expedited purchases occurring dunng hoh pressure saf ety injection system for the reporting the reporting month compared to the total number of pur- period divided by the critical hours for the reporting po-chase orders generated. riod multiphed by the number of trains in the high pres-sure safety injecticn system.

FORCED OUTAGE RATE This indicator is defined as the percentage of time that IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT OF SER.

the unit was unavailable due to forced events compared VICE to the time planned for electrical generation. Forced Total number of in-line chemistry instnments that are events are failures or other unplanned conditons that out of-service in the Secondary System and the Post require removing the un:t from service before the end of Accident Sampling System (PASS).

the next weekend. Forced events include start-up fail-ures and events initiated while the un:t is in reserve shut. INVENTORY ACCURACY down (i.e., the unit is availaole but not in servce). The percentage of line noms that are cc,Jnted each month by the warehouse which need count adjustments.

FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR This indicator is defined as the steady state pnmary coob INVOICE BREAKDOWN ant F131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contri. The number of invoices that are on hold due to shett ide, bution and normalized to a common punfication rate. COE, and miscellaneous reasons.

Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposited on re-actor core internals from previous defective fuel or is LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS p.asent on the surface of fuel elements from the manu. Tnis indicator shows the number of SRO and/or RO quiz-facturing process Steady state is defined as continuous zes and examsihat are administered and passed each operation for at least three days at a power level that month. This indcator tracks training performance for does not va y more than + or 5*/.. Plants should collect SEP #68.

data for this indcator at a power level above 85%, when possible. Plants that did not operate at steady-state LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TR AIN-power aoove 85% should collect data for this indcator at ING the highest steady-state power level atta:ned during the The total number of hours of training given to each crew month, during each cycle. Also provided are the simulator train-The density correction f actor is the ratio of the specific ing hours (which are a subset of the total training hours),

volume of coolant at the RCS operating temperature tne number of non-tequahicaton training hours and the (540 degrees F., Vf = 0.02146) divided by the specife number of exam failures. This indicator tracks training volume of coolant at normalletdown temperature (120 performance for SEP #68.

degrees I at outlet of the letdown cociing heat ex-changer, V! = 0.016204), which resuits in a density cor-rection f actor for FCS equal to 1.32.

89 l

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ . _ 1

PERFORMANCE IrlDICATOR DEFitJITIONS tcont'd)

LICENSEE EVEFT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER DREAXDOWN BREAKDOW14 Thm ind cator is a t"eavdown of correme non outage This indicator shows the number and root cause code for maintenance work orders t'y tevera' categories that to Licensoo Evsnt Reports. The root cause codes are as ma n open at the end of the reperting month This indo follows: cator tracks maintenance performante for SEP #36

1) Admin:strabve Control Prob:e n Management and sumirvsory defcencies that aNct p' ant programs or MAINTENANCE OVERTIME actrvit.es (i 9., por otanmng brokdown or lack of ad- The % of overnme hours comparea to r ormal hours for equate managr ro ..a supervso y cor'ro( inconect m aintenane( . Th:s includes OPPD personnel as neti as procedures, S, a contract pertnnnel

2) Lcensed Operator Error Th;5 cause code captures Orort of omsson'commrsson by IcensW reactor opera- MATERIAL REQUEST Pt ANUtNG tors during plant actr# es The percent of mateha' %vetts (MRS) for issues with

3) 0:he' Personnel Error - Errors of omiss oraommis- their request date the same as the;r need date compared von commmed by non Rensed personnelinvoved in to 1.he total number c' MRs.

pl ant activr:45

~ 4) Maintenance Probwrn - The intent of th:$ cause MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPGSURE code 6 to capture the f A range of pict% cms whch can The total maximax. amount of f ad:aton recorved by an be arthDuted in any way to programmabe def cenc es in individual porten working at FCS on a monthly, quaderly, the maintenance funcional organ raton. Act.wims in- and annuai bas.

cluded in thm category are ma ntenance. fnsbng, surveh lance, cal.brabon and radiabon protecton.

MWO PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 15 REFUELING

5) Design'Constructovinstdaton'Fabri:aten Prublem OUTAGE)

ThG cause code covers a Iull orige of prog >ammate The total number of Ma;ntenance Work Orders that have defconmes in the areas of design, et,nstruc'on, instalia- been approved for inclusion in the Cycle 15 Refoehng -

tion, and f abricabon (i.e , loss of control power due to Outage and the number that are ready to work (parts ,

underrated tuse, equipment not cuc!.hed for the environ- staged, planning complete, and all other paperwork ment, etc ). ready for field use). Also included is the number of E) Equipment Failures (Electrone Piece Parts or Enve MWos that t! ave ervneering holds (ECNs, yocedures ronmentat Related Fadures) This code is used for spuri- and o;her miscellaneout engineering holds), parts hold, ous f ailurce of electronic piece pa ts and failures due to (parts stageri not yet inspected, pans not yet crrived) met worologcal cond bons i sch as 1,ghtmng. sce, high ano planning nc9 (job scope not yet completed 3 Main-winds, etc Gener:l!y,it includes spurous or one bme tenanca W- Acquests (MWRS) are also shown that f ailures. Electre mmponents mcluded in this category havs , a An..hed for the Cycle 15 Refuehng Outage

. are circurt cards, rectif,ers, b; stables, fuses, c;3 pac. tors, and have not yet been conve ted to MWOs dodes, resistors, etc NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS LIQUID RADh0 ACTIVE WASTE DElHG DISCHARGEDThe number of radclogcal hot spots which have been TO THE ENVIRONMENT identfied and encumented to exet at FCS at the end of This indicaior ditplays the tota! number of curies fr:m all the reporting month. A hot spot is a smalllocahzed i< quid releases f rorn FCS to the Missouri River. souren of radiation. A hot spot occurs when the contact doss rate of an stem is at least 5 times the General Area LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) dose rate and the tiem's dose rate is equalto of greater The totalnumber of securitiincidents for the reporting than 100 mrem' hour, month depicted in two graphs. This indicator tracks so-cunty pe iormance fer SEP #58. NUMBER OF NPRDS MULTIPLE FAILURES The number cd NFRDS reportable f ailures over the pro-MAINTrNANCE EFFECTIVENESS ced:ng eighteen months sorted by component meuiac-The number of Nuclear Pl;nt Rel:ab:!.ty Data System turer and model number.

(NPRDS) components with r ore than 1 f acute and the number of NPRDS components wr'5 more than 2 tailures NUMBER OF OU'; OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM for the latt eighteen months. INSTRUMENTS A control room instrument that cannot perform its des (

MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG functon is considered as out-of service. /> cer< trol room The number of corrective non outage ma ntenance work instrument which has xd a Maintenance Work Order orders that remain open at the end of the reporbng (MWO) written for n and has not been repued by the month. This indcato: was added to the PI Report to end of the report, rig pered is considered out et service trend open corrective non outage maintenance wrk or- and wdl be counted The duraton of the out-of service dets as stated in SEP #36. co'daten is not considered. Computer CRTs are not considered as control room instruments.

90

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITiOtlS (Cont'd)

NUMBER OF PERSO%EL ERRORS REPORTED IN OVE;4All. PROJECT STATUS LLRS This in$cator snows the status of the projects whch are The number of Lcensee Event Reports (LERr) amb tod in t% serpe of the Cycle 15 Retuang 0utage to personnol error on the original LER submittat This indcator trends personnel performance for OEP #15, OVERDUE At4D EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTIOff REPORTS tNMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCF. TESTS RE. TFe number of overdue Corrective Act on Reports SULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS (Cf.Rs) and the number of CARS whch received exten-The number of Survedlance Tests (STs)that resu't m sons b oken down by organizaton for the last 6 months.

Licensen Event Rere ts (LERs) during the reportag month This inder tracks missed STs for SEP #6n & PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTE.

61. HANCE ACTIVITIES Th.1 % of the riumber of completed maintenance activi-OPERATIONS AilD MAINTENANCE BUDGET t.es as compared to the number of scheduled mainte-The year 10 date budget compared 10 tne actual expen- nance actwitici each week. This *iis shown for each drtures for Operatons and Maintenance depa tments maintenance craf t. Ma!nteaance actirrbes inckde MWRs, MWOS, STs. PMDs, cahbratoas and other rmscella-OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS neous activities. These mdcators track Maintenance This mdicatv displays the total number of outstanding performance for SEP #33.

Corrective Acton Reports (CARS), the r umber of CARS that are of, a than six rnentM and tne number nf raoda- PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE caton related CARS. The rato of the nur@ 3f turnovers to average employ-rwnt, A turnover is .cancy created by voiuntary res-OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS ignation f rom the company. Retirement, cea.h, tertmna-The number of Moditcation Requer.a (MRs)in any state ton, transfers within the company, and part t;me employ.

between the tssuance of a !?.odifcaton Number and the ees are not considered m tumover completon of the drawing update.

1) Form FC 1133 Backlogin Progress. This number rep- PLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR resents mod.fcation requests that have not been plant The rato of the planned energy losses dunng a given approved ting the reporting rNnth, period of time, to the referen:o energy generaton (the

2) Modifcaton Requests Being Reviewed. This category energy that could be produced if the unit were operated includes: continuous'y at fe" 90wer under ref erence ambient con-A.) Modifcat.on Requests that are not yet reviewed. droons), expressen as a petconta;e.

B.) Modifcabon Requests being reviewed by the Nuchar Projects Review Committee (NPRC). PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE C.) Mod fcation Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear This indicator is defined as the % of preventive mainte-2 Projects Commmee (NPC) nance Hems in the month 11at were not completed by the These Mod 6 cation Requests may be reviewed several scheduled date plus a grat e penod equalto 25 % of the times before they are approved for c comphs.: Mt or scheduled intervat. This ir dicator tracks provertive cancelled. Some of these Mod,fication Requests are montenance actwities for SEP #41, retumed to Engineering for more informaton, some ap-prnved for evaluation, some approved for study, and PROGRESS OF CYCLE 15 OUTAGE MODIFICATION so.ae aporoved for plar.ning. Once planning is com- PLANNING pleted and the scope of the work is clearly defined, these This indir,atar shows the tatus of modifcatons ap-Modifcaton Requests may be approved for accomplish- proved for completon dur'ng the Cycle 15 Ref uehng Out-moqt with a year assrgned for construction or they may age, be carcelled. Atl of these ditferont phases require re-vs .v. PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY % OF HOURS OUT

3) Design Engineering Backlog in Progress. Nuclear OF LIMIT Planning has assigned a year in which constructon w'il The % ci hours out of limit are for six pomary chemistry 5

be completed and design work may be i? progress. pa'ameters divided by tha total number of hours possible

4) Construction Brklog'In Prog'ess. The Construction for the month. The key parameters used are: Lithium, Package has been issued or construction has begun but Chbride. Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluonde, and the mo6fication has not been accepted by the System Suspended Sohds. EPRilimrts are used.

Acceptance Committee (SAC).

5) Desigr Engineering Updata Backlog 1n Progress. PED has received the Mo$fcaton Comploton Report but the drawings have not been updated.

The above menhoned outstanding modications do not

,nclude modif cations which are proposed for cance!!a-tion.

91

PERFORMANCE IfJDICATOR DEFitJITIOfJS (cont'd)

PROCEDUR AL NONCOMPLtANCE If4CIDEf 4TS a!so inctuacs inecent: that were caused by incorrect (MAlf4TEf4Af4CE) access authontaton mf ormabon entered into the securrty The number of identihed incidents concem y rw

sistem cumputet nance procedura! p'ob!ams, the number csf closed irs

3) Securrty force Error - Events caused by members of related to the use cf procedures ( nc udes the number c! the secunty force that are found to De inattentwe to their closed irs caused by procer.ivrai noncomphancs), and duties or who negMeted to property periorm assgned the number of clossd procedura! norccmpunce irs funciens (e g , regered search precedure or patrol).

This indicator trends personnel pnriormanco ir SEP 4) un3,cy,ed Daors - Doors which are found to be unse-

15,41 & 44 cured wah no compenst, tory ethcer posted or where the indmdual causing the alarm d;d not remain at the RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGR AM alarmed door untd a seutny c hcer respond'd. Events The number of identied poo' rad.oiog ca! wot practces where an unsecured uoor is caused by M c'e**u'e are (PRWP) for the reportir:g month. This indicator tra%S included in this category unless thete is an indicaten that rad ologica! work perbrmance for SEP #52. an ad;ustmera was made to the door.

This indicator tracks secunty performarre for SEP #58.

RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENAf4CE The f ato of preventsvg rm ntenance (includmg 5JrVeb SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES i lance testing and cabbraSon procedures) to the sum of The fo!cwing components are the types of loggablo4e-non outage corrective maintenance and preventwe main- portab!e SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES represented in

) tenance completed over the report 1ng pered. The rato. t'os indicator. Incidents in this category include a!a'm j erpressed as a pe'centage n calculated based on man- systern f ahres, CCTV f attes, security computst f a:1-hours Th>s indicatur tracks prevenhve ma nienance ac* ures, search equipmont f aNres, and door hardware f al-twities for SEP #41.

uros These system f adures are further categonted as fol!ows:

RECORDABLE INJURYe1LLNESS CASES FRE- 1) A! arm System Fadure Detection sys*'i events in-

, OUENCY 9 ATE volving f aiwnuit,ance alarms and me mcal f a; lures.

The number of injuries reqwnng more than normal first 21 Alarm System Environs Degradatens to detecton aid per 201000 man hours worked This indicator 7 system performance as a resu!! of environmental condi- i trends personne1 performance for SEP s15,25 & 26 tions ke., rain, snow, frost)

3) CCTV ~adures Mechan: cal fadures to o!! CCTV hard-SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE ware comp nents.

INDEX

4) CCTV Environs Degradations to CCTV p9rformance The Chemistry Performance Inder (CPI)is a calcula'on as a resutt of environmental cond t:ons (i e, rain, snow, based on the concentration of key impurcies in the sec- f rost, f og, suns;>ots. Shado),

ondary side of the plant. These key impunt>es are the 5) Socurdy Computer Fadures Failure of the multi-most likely cause of detercrat on of the steam genera- plexer, contral processing unit, and othor computer hard.

tors. The chemistry parameters are reported ordy for the ware and Sc'twam This category does not enclude sof t-penod of time greater than 30 percent power.

ware problems caused by operator error in using the The CP)is calculated using the fonowing equat on: CPI- so'tware (Ka/0.8) + (NGO) + (0/10)) / 3 where the lotuwing are

6) Search Equipment I-ailures - Fahres of vray, meta!,

monthly averages of: Ka - average blowdown caton or explosive detec* ors and other equipment used to conductivity, Na . average blowdown sodium concen-search for contraband This also includes incidents tration, O, - average condensate pump discha'ge dis

Where the search equipment is found to be defective or soked oxygen concentraton. did not function properly dunng testing.

7) Door Haraware Fadures - Fadure of the door alarm SECURITY NON-SYSTEM FAILilRES and other door hardware such as la*ches, electre r,tnkes, The foHowing components ara the types of loggabte're- doorkncus, locks, etc.

portabte non system f adures represented in this indica- 8) 1991 vertus 1992 System Fadures - Statistics from tor, incidents in this category include secunty ba:tges. 199i will be compared on a monthly basis with 1992 access control and authontaton, secunty force error, toggable'reportabte system fadu es. This indcator tracks and unsecu'od doors. secanty performance for SEP #58.

1) Securny Badges - tradents associated with improper use and handhng of security badges. Incidents include SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE securrty badges that are lost, taken out of the protected Thc dottar value of the s;>are parts inventory for FCS dar-area, out of contro! on site, or inadvenenUy destroyed or ing the reporting period.

broken.

2) Access Control and AuthorizaSon - Administrative and SPARE PARTSISSUED procedural errors associated with the use of the card- The dottar va've of the spare parts issued for FC3 dunng access systern such as ladgabng, incorrect secunty the reporting perod.

badge issued, and improper escon procedures. This 92

1 i

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd) l STAFFING LEVEL TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS The actuat staff.ng level and the authorized stMtng level The tota! number and department breakdown of tra'nmg for the Nuci$ar Ope *atens Div: son, the Producion Engi- instructen hours administered by the Train ng Center.

, neonng Divison, and the Nuclear Sern,es D-vision This indcator tracks performance for SEP s24. l TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS '

Reportable skin and clothing contaminations above l

. STATION NET GENERATION background lenrIs greater than 5000 epm'100 cm t lhe not generaten (sum) prodnced /b tha FLS unn9 squared. This andcator trends personnel pertormance the reporting month, for SEP e15 & 54.

STOCKOUT HATE UNIT CAPADlLITY FACTOR !

The total riumber of Pek Tickets thtit were generated dunng the reporSng month and the tota! number of Pick The rato of the available energy generat on over a grven j time percd to the ref erence energy generahon (the en.

Tickets that were generated during the reporting inonth ergy that could be produced if the urut were ope med

when the amount of parts requested is ecual te cr less continuously at full power under reference ambient con-than the rr,inamum stocking Me! *M pans a %! avad- ditions) over the same time perod, expretsed as a per-able. c entage.

4 TEMPORAPY MODIFICATIONS UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS The number of temporary mer.hanical and elee'rcal con- WHILE CRITICAL figuratons to the plant's systerns. This indicator is dehned as the number of onplar.ned au-

1) Temporary configuratons are defir;ed as e>ctrical tomat c scrams (reactor protecten system topic actua.

pmpers, e!octreal biocks, mechancal jumpers, or me' livns) that occur per 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months of entical operation.

chanical blocks whch are mstalled in the p! ant operat:r g The value for this indcator is calculated by muthptying systems and are not shown on the latest revmon of the the total number of unplatinod automate reactor scrair4 ,

P&lD. schematic, connecten, wiring, or flow ciagrams. in a speerfc time period by 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months , then dividing

2) Jumpers and blocks whch are instal led for Surveil- that number by the total number of hours critcalin ue lance Tests, Maintenance Procedures. Cabbraton Pro- same time porod. The indcate is further defined as f cedures, Special Procedures, or OperaSng Procedures follows:

are not considated as temporary mod!f cations ur#ss the 1) dnplanned means that the sefam was not an antici-jumper or block remains in place efter the test or proce- pa'ed part of a p!anned test.

1 dure is complete. Jumpers and blocks inctailed in test or 2) 3 cram means the automatic shutdown of the reactor lab instruments are not considered as temporary modih- by a rapid inserten of negative wactmty (o g , by control' catons. rods ligsd injection system, etc.) that is caused by ac-

3) Scaffold;ng is not considered a temporary mod 1,ca- tuation of the reactor prelecten systam. The scram St toa. Jumpers and b5cks which are ina:tallej and for nat may have resu'ted from oceeding a setpoint or may which MRs have been submitted will be considered as - have been spureus.

! ten',porary modificatons untilfinal resoluten of the MR - 3) Automate means that the irutial signal that caused _

and the jumper or block is removed or is permanently actuation cf the reactof protecton system logic was p'o- ;

recorded on the drawings. Th:s indreator tracks tempo- vided from one of the sensors morutoring plant param-l rary mod 6 cations for SEP #62 & 71, eters and conditions, Mther than the manual scram ,

l swriches or, in manua! turbine trip switches (or push-but- ,

THERMAL PERFORMANCE tons) provided in the main control room.

The rato of the design gross heat rate (corrected) to the 4) Cnt cal rneans that during the steady-state condition of ,

adjusted actual gross heat rate, erpressed as a percent

the reactor prior to the scram, the effective multipbcatan age. factor (kg) was essentiatry equal to one.

TOTAL HOURS OF STUDE. T TRAINING UNPLANNED CAPABillTY LOSS FACTOR The total number of student hours of truitung for Opera' The ratio of the unptrnned energy losses during a g'ven i tiens, Maintenance, Chemistry /Radotion Protocton, penod of time, to the reference energy generat on (the

! Technical Support. General Employee Traininc, and energy that could be produced rf the unit were operated Other Training conducted for FCS. continuously at fuu powor under reference ambient cony d:hons) over the same time pesd, expressed as a per-contego.

+

T

PERFORf.i At1CE If1 DICA TOR DEFitJITIOtJS (Cont'd)

UNPLANNED SAFETY SY91EM ACTUATIOf1S-(INPO DEFIN'T10N)

Tius i%cator is def.ned as the som of the f ahaa.ng safety sptem actv8uas:

t) The nurnbv of ut. planned Emergency Coru Cochng System ([CCS) actJahons that resyt hopi fba:n.ng an ECCS actovon setpo:nt or f rom a spur casinadverte-t l ECCS signa' E) The number of unplanned emergency AC pov.ef sys-tem actuatons that resu!1 t'om a loss et poner to a safe-guards bus An ur p!anned safety system actuaton o -

Curs when an actuahon 14tpo nt for a sa'ety system is reached of when a sputous or inadvertent sgnalis gen-e'ated (ECCS caly), and major equ:pment in tno r.ystem is actua'ed Unpianned rreans that the system actuaton was not part of a p!anned tc s! Or evalube't The ECCS sctu* tons to be counted are actuat: ora of the h gh pret-57te injecion system, the low prenure in,ect:an system, of the safety mjecten tans.

j UliPLAs4NED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS (Nr.C DEFINITION)

The number of safety system actuat.ont which nclude a, (pdy.) the High Pressure Saf ety injecten System, the Low Pressure Saf e',y injechon System, the Saf ety in;ec.

tion Tanks, and the Emergency D,esel Generators The NRC clatssfication of *a'oty sys'em actuahons includes actuation', when major equipment ts operated d when tho logic e ysums for the ateve safety systems are chab j lenged.

VIOLATIONS PER 1,000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator is defined as the number of violahons saed

in NRC inspection reports for FCS per 1,000 NRC in-specton hours. Tbc mlatons are reported in the year that the inspection was 3ctuahy performsd and not based on when the intpection report as recetved. The havrs reported for each inspecton repci1 aro uied as tho in-j spectoq hours.

VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RA0lOACTWE 4

WASTE This indicator is cofined as the vo!ume of lowJwal sohd radioa+tive waste actually shipped for burial. This indica-for also shows the volunie of low level radioactive waste which is in temporary storagh the amount of radcactive oil that has been sh:pped off site for processing, and the volume of solid dry radioactive waste which has been shippoJ off. site for processing. Low level solid radioac-tree waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator tettoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance Dry radioactive waste includes contaminated rags, cleansg materials, disposable p'otective clothing plashe conta!ners, and any other material to be disposed of at a lev-level radio-actwo was'9 d1sposal sce, creept resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low tevel refers to all radcachve waste that ,s not spent f uel or a by product of spent fuel i processing This indicator tra%s radiological work per.

forrnance for SEP #54 N

L____ _ - - - _ _ - - ___ - ___ _

SAFETY Ei1HAtJCEMEtJT PROGRAM llJDEX The purpose of the Sate!y Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators indr x is to list perior, mance indicators related to SEP ftems with parameters that can 50 trended SEP Reference Number 15 Eage increase HPES and IR Accountability Through Use of Performance Indicators Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) - . 33 lotal Skin and Clothing Contanynations .

. 51 Recordable injury /lliness Cases Frequency Rate . . 70 Number of Perronne: Errors Reported in I.ERs , ,

. 71 CARS issued vs Significant CARS lssued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported . .83 SEP Refe ence Number 20 Quality Audits and Surveillance Programs are Evaluated, improved in Depth and Strengthened CARS !ssued vs Significant CARS 1: sued vs NRC Violations issuc,d vs LERs Reported . . 83 d'f P Reference Number 21 l Dovclop and Conduct Safety System FunctionalInspections CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Viciations issued vs LERS Repor1ed . . 83 SEP Re'erence Number 21 Complete Staff Studies Statting Level

.73 SEP Reference Numbet$

Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented Disabling injurynliness Frequency Rate . . .18 Recordable Injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . . 70 SEP Reference NumbeLU Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements Disabling injury / illness Frequency Rate . . . . . 10 Recordable injury /ll! ness Cases Frequency Rate . . . .70 SEP Reference Number 31 Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWO Planning Gtatus . . .

. 64 Overall Project Slatus . .

. . 85 Progress of Cycle 15 Outage Modification Planning. . .86 SEP Refef ence Number 33 Davelop On Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Electrical Maintenance) . .

. . . 35 (Pressure Equipment) . . . . .

. . . . . .36 (General Maintenance). .

. 37 (Mechanical Maintenance) . . . . .. .. . . 38 (Instrumentation & Control) . . . . . . . 39 SEP Refet,gncfqBymber 36 Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog s Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Breakdown (Corrective Non. Outage Maintenance). . . . . 27 -

Corrective Maintenance Backlog Greater than 3 Months Old (Non-Outage) . .. 28 Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non. Outage Maintenance) . . . .. ,44 SEr> Rgterence Number 41 Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule Ratio of Preventive to Total f.Sintenance . . . 29 a

Preventive Maintenance iterr.i Overdue . . . .30 Procedural Noncompliance incidents . . 33 95

SEP ReleIeme NumbeL42 implement the Check Valve Test Program Check Valve Failure Rate. 44 SEP Reig grgejgtrggt,y Comphance Wtn and Use of Procedures Procedural Noncomphance incidents (tJaintenancej 33 SEP ReferLrne Number 40 Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program Document Review . .22 SEP Ref erence Numbg:J2 Estabbsh Supcmsory Accountabihty for Workers Radological Practices Radiological Work Practices Program .53

Slip fictrieme NufttrL5.4 Complete implementaten et Radclogeal Enhancement Program Collective Rad aton Exposure (Cumulatm.) . .16 Volume et Low level Sohd Radcar.tive Warte . .17 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . . 51 Decontaminated Radiation Controlled Area . 52

)

SEP Ref erenceEgnteL(f Revise Physical Secunty Training and Procedure Program Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Secunty) . 57 j Secunty Non System Failures . .58 Security System Failures .59 SEP Ref eicace NumbufG Improve controls Over Surveillance Test Program Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resu!!ing in Licensee Event Reports. .40 i Sie.Reierence Num.h.;LE).

Mod:ty Cornputer Program to Correctly Sct,cdule Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports. 40 SEPEerence NumbeLQ2 c Estab!:sh intenm System Engineers Temporary Modifications . . 52 Engineenng Assistance Request (EAR) Blear,down. .67 Engineering Change NDtice Status . .68 En: 1eenng Change Notice Breakdown . ~69 i

SEPBeterence NumberM Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and Establish Means to Monitor Operator Training Licensed Operator Requahhcation Training . .74 License Candidate Exams. .75 SEP Refetere.. Number 71 Improve Controls over Temporary Modihcatens Tempoiary Modificahons . . 66 93

REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST R. L Andrews D C. Gorence M. W. thchols G. L. Anglehart R. E. Gray {

C. W. Norris (

W.11 Baiernan M J. Guinn Nuclear Licensing K. L Betek G. E. Guhani & Industry Affairs A. D. Bilau K. B. Guliani J. T O'Connor T. G Blair E.R Gundal W. W. Orr B. H. Biome R H Guy L. L Parent C. N. Bloyd R. M. Hawkins T. L. Patterson J.P.Bobba M. C. Hendrickson R T. Pearce C. E. Boughter R. A Henning R. L. Phelps M. A. Breuer K. R. Henry W. J. Ponec C. J Brunnert J. B. Herman L M. Pulverenti M. W. Butt G. J. Hill l T. M. Reisdorft C. A. Carlson K C Holthaus l A. W. Richard J. W. Chase L G. Huhska D. G. Ried G R.Chatheid C.J. Husk G. K Samide A. G. Christensen R L Jaworski T.u.Sandene A J. Clark R A Johansen B. A. Schmidt O. J. Clayton W C. Jones S, T. Schmitz R P. Clemens J. D. Kecy F. C. Scoheld J L Connolley J D. Keppler L G. Sealock G M. Cook D. D. Kloock H. J. Schek M. R Core J. C. Knight J. W. Shannon S. R. Cntes D. M. Kobunski R. W. Short D.W Date G. J. Krause C. F. Simmons R. C. DeMeulmeester L J. Kripal E. L Skaggs R.D.DeYoung J. G. Krist J. L. Skites D. C. Dietz L.T.Kusek F. K. Smith K. S. Dowdy L E. Labs R. L. Sorenson

, J. A. Drahota M. P. Lazar J. A. Spijker T. R. Dukarski R. C. Learch K. E. Steele D. L Eid R. E Lewis

' W. Steele R. G. Eurich R. C. Uebentritt H. F. Sterba H J Faulhaber B. Usowyj . G. A Teeple M. A. Ferdig B. R. Livingston M. A. Tesar F. F. F ranco J. H MacKinnon T. G. Therkildsen M. T. Frans G. D. Mamoran J. W. Tills H. K. Fraser J. W. Marcil D. R. Trausch J. F. W. Friectichsen N. L Martice P. R. Turner S. K. Gambhir D. J. Matthews J. M. Uhland J. K. Gasper J. M. Mat' ice C. F. Vanecek W. G. Gates T. J. Mcivor J. M. Waszak .

M. O. Gautier K. S. McCermick G, R. Williams S W. Gebers R. F. Mehaffey S. J. Willrett

, J. M. Glantz K. G. Metstad W. C. Woerner J. T. Gleason K J. Morris L V. Goldbem D. C. Mueller D. J. Golden R. J. Mueller 97

POSITIVE TREND REPORT ADVERSE TREND REPORT (Continued)

The Positwe Trend Report highhghts several Perior-hoi Outenn+r a Maintenance Work Orde t.itzten mance Indcators wrth data representing cont nued cer- ghn;Qgg formance above the stated goal and indcators with cata (Page 20) representmg signihcant improvement in recent months. Tho twmber of outstat ing MWOs b 12 months ou has increased for three consecutive months. TNs trend is The following indicators have been telec*ed as exhibit:ng due to the Cycle 14 Ref using Outage during February, posit:ye trends: March and April.

Cnyoonent Fat!2 rf Pt'rs1Recnft f CF AR) Summyv Nuraber o' Out-chs ervitLQcntrol Room f astrume"11 (Page 41)

(Page 31) The number of applicaton and totaliailures has in-

, The number c out of service control room instruments creased for three consecutive months. This trend is due has decreased from a totat of 22 in Apn! to a total of 10 to failures found during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

in July and has been below the Fo t Calhoun 1992 goal The figures have increased for the last three reporting (a maximum of 13) for the last two months. rr.onths because INPO requhes approximately 3 mor,ths to audit and process these failures.

(cpb'e'R?nortab'e inedgr'ts $ecu'M (Page 57) Beectd@)ghurv1"noss Cngsfjecuency Rgg The number of loggable' reportable incidents *ning (Page 70}

system f ailures has decreased from a tptal of lar.

The manager of the Safety Department has stated that ary 1992 to a total of 29 in July. an adve9e trend rs indicated based on a comparison of this indcator's 1992 values and the fue year average valuer.

End of Positwo Trend Report Leistens P,gdOOO Insoec'en Hogg 4 (Page 78)

ADVERSE TREND REPORT The number of NRC vioieons per 1.000 inspection hours for Fort Ca:houn staton has increased for four A Perfo mance indcator whch has data representing consacutrve months and exceeds the goat.

three (3) consecutive months of declining performane constitutes an adverse trend. The Adverse Trend Rs art Cumalative WMions and NCV3.,(Ifefve Month Runnino explains the conditions under which certain indcator$r a e 1p:21 ,

showing adverse trends. nn nrplanation willbe provided (Page 80) for indcators with data teorosenting three months of do. The number of cumult.tive volations (twolve month ruri-clining periormance that have been laboled as adverse ning total) has increased fcr four consecutwo months.

trends.

The followrng indicators are exh%ng adverto trends for End of Adverse Trend Report.

- the reportmg month, Ecss# Outace rite (Page 2)

The torced outage rate has inwned for three consecu- INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED tive months.

Dsabbna M!urv@ ness Rate This secten lists the indcetors whch shon inadequacies (Page 18) as compared to the OPPD geal and indicators which The manager of the Sefety Dopartment has stated that show inadoquacies a.s compared to too industry upper an adverse trend is indcated based on a comparison of ten porcentile. The indicators will be compared to the this indcator's 1992 values and the fwe year average industry upper ten percenti!e as relevant to that indcator..

values.

' Ecu;oment Faged Outaae Rat,g . Uno1anaed Automatic Reador Saram,s oor 7.000 Hours (Page 20) Cemeal The equiprtisat forced outage rate has increased fo' (Page 3) three consecutive months. The ouniber of unptanned aummatic reactor scrams per -

7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months critical year to date value for the reporting month (5 69) exceeds the Fort Cathoun 19)2 goal of 2 ero (0).

96 I

INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES (Continued) (Continued)

Ratio of Preventive to Totai Mrntenance (Non-Oulne) Proc'ets of Cvele 15 Outa,e ModAcaten Plann'no (Page 29) (Page 86)

The ratio of preventive to total maintenance for tne re-This indicator has been envised to further define the porting month (41.E%)is lower than t"e Fort Calhoun moifcation categonen goalof65 E h ie- r ce W erv 0 de+ Oa d'o2 End of inecator improvement / Changes Report.

(Page 34) '

The number of correctue non-outage MWOs that were open at the end of the reportAg month (3'is4) exceeds the Fort Calhoun goal of a manimum of M In-Lme Chg.en'stry lat**taents Out of Service (Page 48)

The number of in-line chemistry instruments out o' sar-vice for the reporting month (24) exceeds the Fort Cal-houn goal of a marmum of 6.

Totni Sun sad Cle'*a Co-taman rens (Page 51)

The cumulative skin ano clothing contaminations at the end of the roporting month (248) exceeds the Fod Cal-houn goal of 144 DecontWnated Radiaton Coatr0Ued Ateg #

(Page 52)

The percentage of the RCA that is decontaminated for the reporting month (87%)is less than the For1 Calhoun goalof 88%

Ey,pygtted Purchases (Page 63)

The percentage of egeited purchases for the reporting mo*:1 " 8-6) exceeds the Fo t Ca houn goal cf 0 SR End of Management Attention Report.

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES This section lists signif cant change; made to the r eport and to specifreindicators within the report since the pre-y ous month.

Diese! Generator Unava%'t (Page 25)

The bwer graph has been changed from column to line form to show cumulative values for 1992.

Ho$ne TraWna Memos This indicator has been deleted f rom the report.

99

__ ____________o

(

. ' - --- m ---a --- . - _ _ ----_m---__.a__i-._-__-_-____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ________- _ ___.

FOfil CALiiOUf4 ST ATIOt/

OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES Evtnt Date Range Production (MWH) Cumulative (MWH)

Cycle 1 09/26 73-02/01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639 1st Refueling 02/01/75 05 09 75 *

Cycle 2 05 09'75 10 01/76 3 853,322 7,152,961 2nd Refueling 10'01/76 12/13.76 *

Cycle 3 12/1376 9'3077 2,805,927 9,958,888 3rd Refueling 09/30.77 12/0977 *

Cycle 4 12,0977 10/1478 3,026,832 12,985,720 4th Refueling 10'14 78-12!24/78 *

Cycle 5 12/24r78 01/18'80 3,802,734 16,8G8,454 5th Rof ueling 01/18/80 - OG/11/80 ' '

I Cycle 6 06/11/80 - 09/18181 3,899,714 20,768,168 6th Refueling 09/18/81 12/21/81 *

Cycle 7 12/21/81 12/0G/82 3,561,806 24,330,034 7th liefueling 12/06/82 04'07/83 *

1

, Cycle 8 04/07/83 03'03'84 3,406,371 27,736,405 8th Refueling 03/03/84 07/12/84 *

Cycle 9 07/12/84 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 9th Refueling 09/28/85 01/16!86 *

Cycle 10 01/16/8G 03/07/07 4,356,753 30,834,646 101h Refueling 03/07/87 06/08/87 *

4 Cycle 11 06/0W87 09l27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 11th Refueling 09/27/88 01/31/89 * *

, Cycle 12 01/31,89 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,689,459 121h Refueling 02/17/90 05/29'90 *

Cycle 13 05!29/90-02/01 92 5,451,069 61,040,528 9 13th Refueling 02/01/92 05/03/92

4 Cycle 14# 05/03!92 09!18!93 (Planned Dates) 14th Refueling

09/18/93 11/13/93 '

\

Cycle 15 11/13!93 03/11/95 *

15th Pefueling 03/11/95- 05/06/95 *

FORT CALHOUN STATION CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS "RECOROS"

( '

First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47 p.m.)

First Electricity Supplied to the System August 26,1973 Commelclal Operation (100,000 KWH) September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%) May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 days) June 8,1987 Sept. 77,1988 Highest Monthly Not Generation (364,468,800 KWH) October 1987 4 Most Productive Fuel Cycle (5,451,069 MWH)(Cycle 13) May 29,1990-Feb.1,1992 s.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ . _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

ML20118A281

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search