Text

Performance Indicators Rept for Nov 1998
	ML20198M314
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	11/30/1998
From:	; OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20198M300	List: LIC-98-0175, Forwards Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Rept for Nov 1998; ML20198M314;
References
	NUDOCS 9901050298
	Download: ML20198M314 (62)
	v • d • e

...

OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION I ;

4 I

% gg .W -

W,. , ~ fihhY hQ$

I ,

are :- .+%a gu 1.~ym . ! ,

6swhen

,gee;g%g;,.gt %ggh@$(j:q

. y o

. t 1.p, Ah;uf je .

ygfl$ y.sg

( **

jlW -sl?Q *Ly [N Ny,y c

( .

p; p y :ig.;f '?;95g f .i k

'ifhN, N5 ' Y di d'#'L 0%$ $ ~"

86 w %W k,%

~"

l a VW, ish @i'fde

+

z fi&5: y C a E'% .

a yM W f " - 1;

., yh

.q l -

3 g a

l .a .. .

k 7 ? dis $

.-w.

I '

BMdl MQ A,Nb[_

B m, sg- L WMGMG,M%n;5;s&

eP. .% mMd1N l f fsmeqq .. p $,$$,6f;eo%~E..istPM9.1:yede W d.m ?aQipa%

o%jjg 4gn,plpgap@a,b$ m a w & whkbioDDMrf7NdOMi.f$k2N

, . . .gep:

.-m s.

MLih wkst4NI b1NTMkS

. m .. .- us

t 7 I

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

[

NOVEMBER 1998

~

9901050298 981223 PDR ADOCK 05000285

- R PDR,

[

[ OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION y

]

o#

1 < -

_.b@u .

.e _

m

,. E n 3Mr $#. ayg$.o: pe.dsj d, ~ 3 f

~

r; .,

' fl: '. .- '

p,h e '

hgl

. ;$h, !}f ','gl'rl.,Ij ; l 5l,

%t h <g y . k f. k f%

....,,i f !'

Ik ,..- .

r;'m,W g~syg[guaa

~

1 m ay w' 3.yw' y 37 7 :n g g yw g@ Sg@"y g .. Ag n ' '

. .s e , ' - ~ <

1 - .+

., ,m. ' p.%"" ,,

%yy '

~ ;;;p .

_t 9;[

, . y .

f' s. bb' '

1 .

p.

iby ~,

3 q k i ,,. jj Y ' '

'Y L a' w - .. a -

Y 3

s 2

. n

{ ;!

I, . .

k_ _

,a_we <~

w g g ip nem &6,_

n.vw MM.9,996mRMD%w@mgg@ggg#M$:m ng~ w ~ :~~m n.aun nn .F%s .-

xm

(*mat W ,c; nyNyp&

%t.;yOy)hsf%. n.8 f ;J m. a.y w% @% ;a l? :biM%?%4 :&Ng+?2;% ..

s,

)CT k'8;isDti j X MidiDd1001n!OM6$e,, Im .-nc ?MN3d ' ; 'M ' * - ,

f2 '

I O~

l PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

{

7 NOVEMBER 1998 1

f 9901050298 981223 . . . -

PDR ADOCK 05000205 R PDR

Tcbb ef Ccnt:nts/ Summary Page TABLE OF CONTENTS /

SUMMARY

. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ... . . . 1 EONTHLY

SUMMARY

REPORT .. ....... . . . . . . .4 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX TREND .. . ... . . ... . ... . . .5 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX INDICATOR ... .. . ... .. . . .. 6 PERFOWNCE INDICATORS

SUMMARY

REPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... 7 INPO NOTEWORTHY / SIGNIFICANT EVENTS . ... . ... ..... . . .. 8 WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Unit Capability Factor . . .. .... . .. . .. .. .. ... 10 Unplanned Capability Loss Factor . . .. . . . 11 Unplanned Automatic Reactor SCRAMS per 7000 Hours .. . .. . .. 12 High Pressure Safety injection System . . . . . .. 13 Auxiliary Feedwater System .. .... ... . .. .. .. . . . . 14 Emergency AC Power System . .. .. . .. ... .. .. 15 Thermal Performance . ... ... .. . . . .... 16 Fuel Reliability Indicator . .. ... .... ... .. . .. . . ... . . . 17 Secondary System Chemistry . . . . .. . 18 Collective Radiation Exposure . .. . ... . . .. .. 19 3

Industrial Safety Accident and Disabling injury / Illness Rate . .. . 20 Volume of Low Level Radioactive Waste . . . . .. . .. 21 SAFE OPERATIONS Personnel Error Rate ... .. . . .. . . . 23 Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate .. . 24 Clean Controlled Area Contaminations

>1,000 Disintegrations / Minute per Probe Area .

. 25 I

1

I Tcbb cf Contents / Summary l

Preventable / Personnel Error LERs . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . ... . ... . ... .. . ... 26 Licensee Event Report (LER) Root Cause Breakdown . . . . . . .. . 27 l

l Violation Trend ... ... . . .... ..... ... . .. . . .. .... . .. 28 l

COST Cents Per Kilowatt Hour .. ... .. . .. . . . . . 30 DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Maintenance Workload Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage) .. .. . . . . . . . . 32 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance .. . . ... .. .. . . . . . . . 33 Procedural Noncompliance incidents . .... . .. . .. . . . .. 34 Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area . . .. . . .. . . .. . . 35 Radiological Work Practices Program . . . . . . .. . .... . ... .. . 36 Document Review . .. . . . . .... . . .. . . . . . .. 37 Security incidents . .. . .. . . . . . . . . ... ,.. . . 38 Temporary Modifications . .. . .. . .. . . . . . .. . .... .. 39 Outstanding Modifications .. . ... ... . . (Data unavailable due to RAMS conversion)

Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown . . ..

(Data unavailable due to RAMS con eersion)

Engineering Change Notices Status .. .. .. .. . . ..... .

(Data unavailable due to RAMS conversion)

Open .... . . . . .. . . . .... (Data unavailable due to RAMS conversion)

Maintenance Rule SSC Unavailability . .. .. . . . . .. .. 40 Licensed Operator Requalification Training . ... . . . . . .. . 41 License Candidate Exams . .. . . .. .. . . .... .. .. . 42 Cycle 19 Refueling Outage MWD Planning Status . .. . . ... .. .. . ..... ... . . . .. . 43 Component Testing Department, Special Services Engineering Department 1998 Outage . . 44 Progress of 1999 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 19 . . ...... .. . . 45 Progress of Cycle 19 Outage MODS and ECN's Added to 1999 RFO After Freeze . . . . . 46 I

l l

2

1 Tcbb cf Centents/ Summary Progress of 1998 On-Line Modification Planning .. . . ... . .. .. ... . .. ... .. 47 l

l ACTION PLANS, DEFINITIONS. SEP INDEX l

l l

Action Plans . ... ............ .... . .... .... . . . . . ... . .... . . 49 1 Performance Indicator Definitions . .. . . .. ... ... .. . . .. . . .. . .. . 50 l

Safety Enhancement Program index ... ... . . . . . .. . .. .. .. 55 Current Production and Operations " Records"/ Station Operating Cycles and RFO Dates . . . . . . 57 j Milestone Schedule . . ... .... .. . ... ... . .. .. . 58 l

Monthly Performance Indicator Sources .. .. .. .. . .... . .. ..... .. 60 I I

l

{

i i

1 3

t l.

l l .

I FORT CALHOUN STATION Monthly Summary OPERATIONS During the month of November 1998, the Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) operated at a nominal 100% power.

Normal plant maintenance, and equipment rotation activities were performed.

j WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS The overall WANO Performance Index was 84.4% during the 3rd Quarter of 1998. Significant percentage point losses are attributed to the WANO Performance In(cators listed below:

1. The Unit Capability Factor /nd/cator, calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 3.7 point loss as a result of unplanned energy losses defined on page 10.

2. The Unplanned Capabilityloss Factorind/cator calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 6.6 point loss as a result of unplanned energy losses defined on pages 10 and 11.

3. The ThermalPerforrnance Indicator, calculated over the previous 12 months, contributed to a 0.3 point loss due to thermal energy losses experience during reactor power changes and forced outages defined on pages 10 and 16.

4. The Collect /ve Radiation Exposure indicator, calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 3.1 point loss, which was attributed to fuel failures and recent high exposure jobs during the refueling outage on page 19.

5. The Emergency AC Powerindicator, calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 1.2 point loss, which was a result of on-line maintenance, and replacement of relays under ECN95-347,

" Replace Relays for Seismic Adequacy" on page 15.

6. The Chemistry Performance Index Ind!cator, calculated over ths previous 12 months, f contributed to a 0.4 point loss, which is due to copper tubes in heat exchangers and mechanical shock to systems !n the past year from forced outages defined on page 10.

{ 7. The industrial Safety Accident Rate Indicator, calculated over the previous 12 months, contributed to a 0.2 point loss, which is due to a loss time accident.

4

. _ ~ .. m . . . _ . _ . _ ___ . _ _ _ . ..m_ -._ __. _. .~ . _ . . _ . , _ _ _ _ . _ _ ._

-o-index Mediin _+-Index Best Qu"_rtile %-index Wo Quirtila --,--Fort Calhoun 100 100 95 - 95 90 - j : : :M - 90

+

85 f --- 85 4 80 - / _ , . 80 A

75 - .

j \ : 75 l

70 - I

70 65 -- a# 65 80 + + - + . - -

: __+ _+_+y : so m ggm m m mg n m mm m n 2$$E9

. l 8AA2? "

36 38 $ ;

8 8 8 8 E!

$88888 88888 8 6

WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX TREND FortCalhounindexCalculation - - Third Quarter 1998:

4 OVERALL PERFORMANCE INDCATOR WEGHT 'VALUE; -PRODUCT:

Unit Capability Factor (2yr) 0.1s 78.3 12.3 j_ Unpl. Cap. Loss Factor (2yr) 0.12 s.3 5.4 Unplanned Auto Scrams (2yr) 0.08 0.0 s.0 Safety System Performance:

PWR High Press. Inj. (2yr) 0.10 0.000 10.0 PWR Aux. Feedwater (2yr) 0.10 0.003 10.0 Emergency AC Power (2yr) 0.10 0.015 a.s Thermal Performance (1yr) 0.06 99.9 s.7 Fuel Rel. (Most recent qtr) 0.08 1.oE-06 8.0 Chemistry Perf. Ind. (1yr) 0.07 ,

1.15 6.6 Collective Rad. Exposure (2yr) 0.08 223 4.7 Ind. Safety Acc. Rate (1yr) 0.05 0.16 s.o NORM.L 84.4 -

5

l 18.00 8

$ E M A X IM U M V A L U E D Second Qtr '98 EThird Qtr '98 16.00

!E g

14.00 88 cW !

12.00 888 888 8, '

00o ooo ov lm 10 M

~~~

~ 3*:

" " 2, 8 888 8gg

!g 8.00 -s . .. .. g y,eo go,

.n , ..,

6.00 ... .- -[ e-O8

000 mmm

1. y. .

lI 4N

.f

,f j. h Qd g

2.m .;.. .A q . y.) d; 7; o, . .4 . o. -

..? a . .nd . d ,

UCF UCLF HPSI AFW EACP CKE UA7 FRI CPI TPI ISAR l 1

im WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX INDICATORS

E This graph shows the dfference between Second Qtr '98 and Third Qtr '98 actual values achieved by Fort

Calhoun.

CALCULATED OVER A 24 MONTH PERIOQ_ _NLAXLMUM/ ACTUAL VALUES TREND UCF Unit Capability Factor 16/12.30 Positive iE UCLF Unplanned Capability Loss Factor 12 / 5.40 Neutral lg HPSI AFW High Pressure Safety injection Auxiliary Feedwater 10/10.00 10/10.00 Positive Positive i

EACP Emergency AC Power 10/ 8.80 Negative

!l l

iE UA7 CRE Unplanned Auto Scrams / 7000 Hours Collective Radiation Exposure 8 / 8.00 8 / 4.70 Positive Neutral CLALCULATED OVER A 12 MONTH PERIOD TPI Thermal Performance Indicator 6 / 5.70 Neutral CPI Secondary Chemistry Indicator 7/ 6.60 Positive ISAR Industrial Safety Accident Rate 5/ 5.00 Negative CALCULATED OVER A QUARTERLY PERIOD FRI Fuel Reliability Indicator 8 / 8.00 Positive

.r I

- - - - . . - - ... .~.- .. - . _ . _ - ___ ___ - .- - - - . ._

j PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

SUMMARY

REPORT l

l ADVERSE TREND REPORT l POSITIVE TREND REPORT A performance indicator with data representing three A performance indicator with data representing three consecutive consecutive months of declining performance or three consecutive months of improving performance or three consecutive months of months of performance that is trending toward declining as

)

performance that is superior to the stated goal is exhibiting a positive determined by the Manager - Nuclear Licensing, constitutes an trend per Nuclear Operations Division Quahty Procedure 37 (NOD- adverse trend per Nuclear Operations Division Quality Procedure 37 QP-37). The following performance indicators exhibited positive (NOD-QP-37). A supervisor whose perfonnance indicator exhibtts an l trends for the reporting month:

adverse trend by this definition may specify in wntten form (to be published in this report) why the trend is not adverse.The following Unnienned Automatic Reactor derams (Page 12) performance indicators exhibited adverse trends for the reporting i

' month.

Hah Pressure Safety Iniection System Safety System Podwnenco -

l (Page 13) Temocrary Modifications (Page 39)

Aux. Feed Water System Safety System Podwivence (Page 14)

INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT Thermal P.Jw nence(Page 16)

ATTENTION REPORT Document Review (Page 37) i A performance indicator with data for the reporting period that is i

. inadequate when compared to the OPPD goal is defined as "N60 ding l treressed Management Attention" per (NOD-OP-37).

Meetive Radiation Exoosure (Page ig)

Qggn Controlled Area ContaminallQDa (Page 25)

Cents Per Kilowatt Hour (Page 30)

Radioloaical Work Practices Proaram (Page 36) 4 I

l i

l l

i l

1 7

l

l l

l m Sig nificant O Notewo rthy m Historic al 16 - 14 l 14 - -

12 10 - 7 7 [

3 4 4 4 -- 2 1 1 '

2- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- ,M- ,

, -rM- ,

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 INPO NOTEWORTHY / SIGNIFICANT EVENTS Noteworthy /Significant events at FCS are classified by INPO to identify precursors to events. There was O Significant and 1 Noteworthy Event during the month of November 1998.

I Significant Events for October 1998:

e none Moleworthy Events since start of INPO Cycle:

Emergency Temporary Modification to Ventilation System.

Transformer Fault and Loss of Off-Site Power While Shutdown Due to inadvertent Actuation of Transformer Deluge System, e Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Overspeed and Overpressurization of System Piping.

Reactor Coolant Pump Cavitation During Planned Pressure Reduction.

NC ;; ,ithy Historical Events since start of INPO Cycle:

. Inappropriate Emergency Diesel Generator Operability Criteria.

Waste Disposal System Valves susceptable to over pressurization during post accident sampling due to potential valve failure not considered during System Design.

Conta! ament Hydrogen Panel Components Exceed Qualified Life Due to incorrect Calculation Assumptions.

Degraded Steam Generator Tube Left in Service Due to Personnel Error.

l Dits Source: Frans/Guinn (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Frans/Guinn Trend: None 8

1 i

a i

i i

i ll i

h i

WANO l PERFORMANCE l IND CATORS i

l.

i I

1 i

4 i

i 1

4 e

i

?

i 9 i

i i

i k

1 Monthly Unit Capability Factor -m--- 24 Month Unit Capability Factor

$20.0* 3 , E ss I8 8 8 ss, 8 8

s$$$$,

8 8 8 8 8 9 ghR$s , e

1 8_

8 100.0 % 0 1 g n i S_ g C ,_.1 0 11E- ,% g t a t 1 G

80 0*

4_ y_ _ _ _

=

\_ E_ _ _ _ -- =

60 0% f s

40.0% T- 1998 RFo 20.0%

g g 00% L ,--- ,,-r- +-r + , - ,--- r ~, r- ~-r --

s a aa a a a a ~ ~

a a s s s a s s a s s

$4$li!44}$a$l$$$yssaI44$e$$

UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR UCF is defined as the ratio of the available energy generation over a given period of time to the reference energy generation over the same time period, expressed as a percentage. The FCS Goal for the indicator is (87.5%) and ths WANO Median is (81.9%).

WANO UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR AVERAGES Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 79.7 % 81.4 % 85.6% 83.2 %

Enerav Losagg; Forced Outage-Condenser circulating valve repairs and leakage on Condenser "B" Event Period: September 10, thru 13,1997.

Power Reduction- Faulty Manual Transfer switch on instrument inverter "A" Event Penod: August 26,28,1997.

Forced Outage- Circumferential cracking of a weld down stream of a moisture separator due to high system strcsses Event Period: May 28, thru May 29,1997.

Forced Outage- Steam leak in the fourth stage extraction steam system Event Period: April through mid May 1997.

A 24 month calculation of the WANO UCF indicator was 12.30 points out of 16 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 12.30 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 10.60.

D"ta Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Solymossy Tr:nd: None f

10

t_.._.a Mcnthly Unpl nnid CrEibility Loss Factor -m-- 24-Month Rolling Averaga Fort Calhoun Gort (3.G 4) --*- W ANO Industry M sdi n (2.2%)

60.00% - 8~

50.00% b g

40.00% fn 30.00% -

ig 1999 RFO m-u 10.00 % f9 _o Y \ $ N_ E r - -

d_O_ o M

. . . . . . . . . . . n- -

0.00% C ,-. - ,-,, , , . - , ,--,_r r-,. ,. r q __m. . , _ _,. _ ,_ ,

E k 2 m~2 2 2 2 2 3 2 s2 2 s3 2 3 3 2 bkbbhEkb$$bbbkbbkhkb$hbb UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Unplanned Capability Loss Factor (UCLF), a rolling 12-month average, the OPPD goal, and the WANO Industry Median. UCLF is defined as the l rctio of the unplanned energy losses during a given period of time, to the reference energy g:n ration expressed as a percentage. Unplanned energy loss is defined as energy not produced as a result of unscheduled shutdowns, outage extensions, or load reductions due to causes under plant management control. Energy losses are considered to be unplanned if they cra not scheduled at least four weeks in advance.

UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR AVERAGES Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 4.19% 4.6% 6.9% 7.4%

! A 24 morith calculation of the WANO UCLF indicator was 5.40 points out of 12 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.40 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 5.50.

l Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report l Accountability: Solymossy Trend: None 11

--e- 12-Month Rolling Aver:ge l -+- FCS Re:ctor Scrcm3 Par 7,000 Hours Critical for la:t 36 months Fo t Calhoun Goal (0.0)

--e- WANO Industry Median (0)

{ --*-- FCS Reactcr Scrams - 1997-98 2-f 1998 RCO 0: : : : : : : = = = = =

j ,E $ 5 E I E $ E E y o w a < a < = z a ,

__.. _ _ ]

t UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7000 HOURS CRITICAL The graph shows the 12-month rolling average, the 36-month average, the OPPD goal for 1998 cnd the WANO Industry Median. Also the graph shows the number of Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams that occurred during the last 12 months. There were no Unplanned Automatic Reactor's during the month of November 1998.

UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAM 8 PER 7000 HOURS CRITICAL \

Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 0% 0% 0% 0%

I A 24 month calculation of the WANO UA7 indicator was 8.0 points out of 8 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 8.0 which compares to the second Quarter 1998 value of 8.0.

Data Source: Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Solymossy Trend: Positive l

(

Monthly HPSI System Unavailability Value

-*- 12 Month Rolling Average Fort Calhoun Goal (0.003)

-e- WANOIndustry Median (0.002) 0.02 -

0.015 -

0.01 --

0.005 -

998 E t : : : : : : : : : : :

1 0--- s : : : : : : : : 1-4 4 j E S

'A-N E

0-4

=

E E

g E

v>

U 0 x o

{

HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the High Pressure Saiety injection (HPSI) System unavailability value, as defined by l WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for November 1998. The HPSI System unavailability value for the month of November 1998 was 0.0. There were 0.0 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months of planned unavailability, cnd 0.0 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months of unplanned unavailability.

~

a { WAND HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY SWECTION SYSTEM SAFETY; SYSTEM

, ,(' /F FPERFORABANCEM ,

Ew Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 0% 0% 0% 0%

A 24 month calculation of the WANO HPSI indicator was 10.0 points out of 10 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 10.0 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 10.0 t

D;ta Source: Skiles/Schaffer (Manager / Source)

Accountabi'.ty: Skiles/Schaffer Trend: Positive 13 I

-c-12 Month AFW Un:vall:bility Fcrt Calh:un Goal (0.01)

WANO Industry Median (0.001) 0.015 -

0.013 0.011 l

0.009 0.007 0.006 0.005 l 0.005 1998 RFO 0.003 - ' *-~~-

0.001 0---

l i +

- - -# - - V - ~ ~ U" - -

+

U- - -

V, - - Tr - - - , y 8

-0.001 -

Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov ,

1 l AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEMS ;

SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE I l

This indicator shows the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) System Unavailability value, as defined by l WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the month of November 1998.

1 The AFW System Unavailability Value for November 1998 was 0.0 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months . There were 10.8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months of planned and 0.0 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months of Unplanned Train Unavailability hours during the month.

l

tWANO AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEMS SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE---

Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 0.001 % 0.001 % 0.003 % 0.002 %

l A 24 month calculation of the WANO AFW indicator was 10.0 points out of 10 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 10.0 which compares to the Second Quarter '

1998 value of 10.0.

l D:ta Source: Skiles/Fritts (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skiles/Fritts Trend: Positive l

14

(

m Monthly Em ergency AC Power Unavailability Value l!

-se- Year-to-Date Em ergency AC Power Unavailability Value I Fort Calhoun Goal (0.024)

- * --. WAN O ind us try Media n(0.005) 0.07 $ l 9 1 0.06 - o co 0.05 - 8 o

03 0.02 -l h h hb

\ _

0.01 O

=

r-e g~

M,E g gwg' M

^

o

,M M M ,M g g M ,M

^-

8 g

s e

,8 t a s a y s& ,5 4 <

? $"

t o B z j L

EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Emergency AC Power System unavailability value, as defined by WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the month of November 1998.The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value for November 1998 was 0.01.

" ~

M' . MONTHLY.UNAVAE.AB1UTY. t Planned Unavailability DG-1: 4.6 DG-2: 9.5 Total:14.1 YTD: 217.95 Hours Unplanned Unavailability DG-1: 0.0 DG-2: 0.0 Total: 0.0 YTD: 00.00 Hours

=:= == sumermessumuse := =r = === = = ==: ==c========

iWANO EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE ;

Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 0.017 % 0.017 % 0.015 % 0.015 %

A 24 month calculation of the WANO EACP indicator was 8.80 points out of 10 points. At the end of ths Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 8.80 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 9.40.

Data Source: Skiles/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skiles/Ronning Trend: Needing increased Management Attention 15

I l

m MonthlyTherm:IP:rf:rmenco ;

i i 12-Month Rolling Average Fort Calhoun Goal (99.7%) '

--*- WANO Industry Median (99.1%)

g g g 1998 8 8 8 g 8 8 $ 8 RFO $ $ $" 5 $ ,

100% 8 8 h 99%

I__ I_ __ I_ "" '"

_ I_. t ! h l-98%h + + + + - -

+ ,- + + +m-+ -t -M 2 i k E R ? E U 6 ,5 w a < z

! i

, < g o $

z 4

THERMAL PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the monthly Thermal Performance Value, the rolling 12-month average, the OPPD goal, and the WANO Industry Median. The thermal performance value for the month of November was 99.61%.

The 1998 Fort Calhoun year-end goal for this indicator is an index value which is > 99.7%. The 12 month calculation of the WANO TPIindicator 99.9%.

WANO THERMAL PERFORMANCE <

Year-to-date 12 month 24 month 36 month 100 99.9 99.9 99.9 The 12 month calculation of the WANO TPl indicator was 5.7 points out of 6 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.7 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 5.7.

Data Source: Skiles/Naser(Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skiles/Naser Trend: Positive 16 l

I -

m Fusl Rsllability (E-04 Microcuriss/ Gram)

( A End ofi998 Gost (17.3 E-04 Microcuriss/ Gram)

--o-- WANO Industry Median (0.21E 04 Microcuries/ Gram) l E 100 2

10 - 4,7 U A 1-

$ 0.1 m 0.01 - ,

0.01 0.01 0.01 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The monthly Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) for November 1998 of 5.4 E-04 microcuries/ gram was based on steady state data at 100% power. The purpose of the FRl is to monitor industry progress in achieving and maintaining a high level of fuel integrity. An effective fuel integrity and performance monitoring program provides a means to detect fuel failures and assess the fuel failure number, physical condition, exposure, mechanism, and location.

Coolant activity data through November 30,1998 does show the presence of two defective fuel rods lodine activity levels are higher than expected for a clean core. This is due to operating with fuel failures for the past 2.5 cycles which contributed to the large amount of tramp (lodine-134) and lodine-131 currently present in Cycle 18. The current lodine-134 activity indicates that 70 percent of the tramp materialin the active core region was removed during the spring 1998 refueling outage.

Xenon-133 increased during October, and again in November.

The Quarterly calculation of the WANO FRI indicator was 8.0 points out of 8 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 8.0 which compares to the Second Quartor 1998 value of 0.0.

Data Source: Guinn/Roenigk (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Stafford Trend: None 17

ummu Monneychemistryindicator 1998 Fort Calhoun Chal(1.1)

-s-WANOlndustry Median (1.04) 1.6 - l 1.36 ,

l 1A 1.29 l i '

1.21 1.2- 1 11 1.1 1.11 112 1,1 1,09 1,94 1

0.8 0.6 QA -

RFO 0.2 - o o l 0 - + -+ + H l + + + + + + H l

Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nw i SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY St ady ctate plant conditons required for calculating the Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) for plant performance following Refueling Outage that ended on June 4.

l Tha CPI for November 1998 is 1.09. Morpholine concentration increased to 6 ppm to continue with l secondary chemistry optimization. Iron transport data continues to show reductions in iron transport.

l gs .

j;WANO SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY:

Ycar-to-date 12 month 24 month 36 month l 1.16 1.15 1.32 1.26 Tha 12 month calculation of the WANO CPI Indicator was 6.60 points out of 7 points. At the end of the l- Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 6.60 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 5.60 l

)

D:ts Source: Hamilton /Ostien (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Hamilton Tr nd: None 18

. I MonthlyRedlation Dose (SRD)

-+- A c c u m u l a t e d Dose based on SRD reading 250000 -

g , _

200000 -

t IuJ 150000 --

100000 -

O k.

W o N 50000 ~~S yE 8 ;; D E 8 g 0+av ++

N N N ? $ S

+ ,-+-+-+-+-+-+--a Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE Th31998 goal for Collective Radiation Exposure (CRE) at Fort Calhoun Station was established for o Total Dose of 224.0 person-Rem, based on TLD readings. Dose is tracked monthly by obtaining Electronic Dosimeter (ED) readings, until the Quarterly TLD readings are obtained. The exposure for November 1998 was 1.63 person-Rem (ED). The WANO Industry Median is 127 person-REM per year based on a three year average compared to 139 person-REM per year at FCS.

y ?TLD COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE FOR 1998 :

DOSE FCS GOAL PERSON- FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH REM QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER TOTAL 224.0 15.560 193.163 8.516 person-Rem Tho 24 month calculation of the WANO CRE Indicator was 4.9 points out of 8 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 4.7 which compares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 4.6.

Data Source: Solymossy/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Puckett Trend: Needing increased Management Attention SEP54 19

f mY T Dindustrill Sif:ty Accidsnt & Dtubling injury /lliness Rata

-*--- 12 M onth Rolling Average FCS Year-End Goal (<0.40)

-m- Year 2000 WANo industry Goa)(<0.40) 1-0.9 -

0.8 - ,

0.7 -

g 0.54 ? R n $ 0 5 k ?

o y a o e o e o Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov

__j INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT AND DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS (LOST-TIME ACCIDENT RATE) ,

The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in improving industrial safety performance for utility personnel penaanently assigned to the station. Contractor work-hours are not included in the indicator.

ISAR = (number of restricted-time accidents + lost-time accidents + fataUties) x 200.000 (number of station person-hours worked)

The Fort Calhoun Station Industrial Safety Accident Rate and Disabling injury / Illness Frequency Rate was 0.34 for the month of November 1998. There was no restricted-time and no lost-time accident in November 1998.

d4 WANO SiOUSTISAL SAFETY ACCSENT & OISABLING INJURYALLNESS -

Year-to date 12 month 24 month 36 month 0.18 0.17 0.08 0.13 The 12 month calculation of the WANO ISAR Indicator is 5.0 points out of 5 points. At the end of the Third Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.0 which "mpares to the Second Quarter 1998 value of 5.0.

Data Source: Sorensen/Gunn (Manager / Source)

Solymossy/ Booth (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Short Trend: None SEP 25,26 & 27 20 l

. .. . .. _ ~ .- -. . . . - - - _ - - - - , - - - . -

l l

l Monthly Volume of LLRW (cu. meter) m Year-to-Date Cumulatiw Radioactiw Waste Buried

--u--WANO Industry Median (54 cu. meter)

Fort Cahoun Goal (23 cu. meter )

60.00 l

l = = . . = = = = = . = =

50.00 -

l 5 g 40.00 30.00 - % 8 8 o a O c 20.00 -

o m %

10.00 - Sg 8 # s & g2 ? / 8 g ss $+ 3+ 8 y + s 8 0.00 - U, A, 8 + $5.8+

, n rA

,- r r r l Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec l

l VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE l

This indicator shows the volume of the monthly Radioactive Waste buried and the cumulative y:ar-to-date radioactive waste buried. The Fort Calhoun goal is 23 cubic meters.

! Ft m3 Amount of solid radwaste shipped off-site for processing during current month : 0 0 Volume of solid radwaste buried during November 1998 : 0 0 Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste buried in 1998 : 603.7 17.09 Amount of solid radwaste in temporary storage : 000.0 00.00 The WANO industry Median is 54 cubic meters per year. The industry Best Quartile value is j cpproximately 26 cubic meters per year.

D:ta Source: Solymossy/Breuer (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Puckett l

Trend: None SEP54 s

21 1

SAFE OPERATIONS Goal: A proactive, self-critical and safety conscious culture is exhibited throughout the nuclear organization. Individuals demonstrate professionalism through self-ownership and personal initiative and open communication.

22

1 0 000 ..'

S 000 -

7.000 - 0 of , 4, k 9 000 -

8 g .000 3 .000

,,,,,,' . 6.

5 . 000 P ". ,,,

2 000 1.66 1 27 1 000 - - - -- .- - - M -+-a -

t~ - < - - s-- 0 68 - ,c- A 0 000 -

e e + w- - ,- .

/YYYYYY'eYYYYYYYYYYY% % 7 Personnel Error Rate The purpose of this indicator is to monitor human error events at FCS which are classified as a " Noteworthy Event,"

under the criteria specified in the Condition Report Program. Noteworthy events may be classified as level one, two, or three on a Condition Report or as defined but not limited to the examples listed below:

Error Rate = number of human errors x hours everv two weeks 100,000 hrs

1. A recordable injury in industrial safety.

2. Valve Mispositioning event caused by plant personnel.

3. Equipment tagging error that significantly impacts safe operation of the plant, readiness or personal safety.

4. Improper use of or failure to use safety equipment or performing a task in an unsafe manner.

5. Any event involving loss of radioactive material control that may cause or potentially result in an individual receiving an unauthorized exposure.

G. Any spill or spread of radioactive material, which results in an impact on the plant or the general safety of plant personnel or the general public.

7. Failure to utilize, or adhere to sound radiation principles, or accepted administrative controls to keep occupational radiation exposure, o." exposure to members of public ALARA.

8. Chemistry parameter (s) out of specification, involving insufficient chemistry corrective action or oversight.

9. Violation of procedure or human performance error.

10. Less than 3 deep (qualified members) in minimum staffing position for the Control Room, TSC, OSC, and EOF.

11. Any unplanned impact to offsite evacuation routes or relocation capability.

12. Any failure or theft of emergency response equipment or supplies necessary to complete classification, notification, protective action recommendation or ERO command & control functions.

13. Inadequate training or qualification.

14. Failure to adequately staff the ERO in actual responses or drill notification.

The Rolling Error Rate is calculated over the past 12 month period. Until 12 months of data are available, this line is considered information only, t Data Source: Tesar/Burggraf(Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Tesar TrInd: None 23

m M:nthly R ccrd:ble injury /Illn ss Rata 1998 F.C.S. Goal (1.5) 3-2.6 2.2 ~

1.86 1.85 1.8 -

1.4 ~'

1- 0.82 0.63 0.43 0.53 0.6 - .

0.33 0.3 0.2 0 O

g_ .10.23 ,

-0.2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE This indicator shows the monthly Recordable Injury /lliness Frequency Rate. A recordable injury / illness case is reported if personnel from any of the Nuclear Divisions are injured on the job cnd require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid.

There was one recordable injury for the month of November 1998. A Procurement Employee was bitten by an insect while on a business trip. The 1998 Fort Calhoun Station year-to-date recordable injury rate is 1.85. The goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 1.5.

Data Source: Sorensen/Gunn (Manager /S.ource)

Accountability: Short Tr:nd: None SEP 15,25,26 & 27 I

I 24

m Contamination Events (Monthly)

E Contamination Events (YTD) 100 96 97 90 84 80 - 77 70 65 60 5'

40 - 36 I 30 20 0 1-- m w w v l

r-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec I

CLEAN CONTROLLED AREA CONTAMINATIONS >1,000 I DISINTEGRATIONS / MINUTE PER PROBE AREA l This indicator shows the Personnel Contamination Events in the Clean Controlled Area for contaminations >1,000 disintegrations / minute per probe area for November 1998.

l There was 1 personnel contamination events in November 1998. The total year-to-date of Personnel events is 97 at the end of November 1998. This indicator has been classified as "Needing increased Management Attention," due to an upward trend of Year to date contamination l cvents over the past three months.

Data Source: Solymossy/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability : Solymossy/Short Trend: Needing increased Management Attention SEP 15 & 54

. - . . .. . - - . . - . . . = - . . . . -

-+--Tctal Ev:;nts er no E ror 18 Month Totals l

30

[ 30 *j-- 30 30

% */N +30 29 29 .A+

2 26 + + 27 28 27

, 25 26 20 22 24 24 l

15 15 - 12 12 - 13 13 13 13 13 13 12

. = .

'o- @< w 5-t t1 ;t; .Q; i

7 7 6 6

'y 7

01 s-- -+ + + s--+ a -n

, a a a a a a a a s s a s s s a s a s l I4 8 IA$ I $4 $$ JI I4 4 IA8 l

1 PREVENTABLE / PERSONNEL ERROR LERs This indicator depicts 18-month totals for numbers of " Preventable" and " Personnel Error" LERs. I Tho graph shows the 18-month totals for preventable LERs, the 18-month totals for Personnel Error l LERs, and the Personnel Error totals for each month. The LERs are trended based on the LER l cv nt date as opposed to the LER report date.

l In October 1998, there was one (1) event which was subsequently reported as LER.1 LER was categorized as " Preventable" and 1 LER was categorized as " Personnel Error" during the mor.?h of

October. The total LERs for the year 1998 are thirteen. The total Personnel Error LERs for the y cr 1998 are three.

Tho year-to-date goal for this indicator is that the year-end values for the 18-month totals not to l exceed 5 Preventable and 2 Personnel Error LERs.

l NOTE: Due to the way LERs are tracked & reported, this indicator lags by one-month.

l I

l Drta Source: Frans/Matzke (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Solymossy Tr nd: None SEP 15 4

26

Adnin Msc 8%

.M LO Err.

' igd!: 12 %

I Other Err.

.. 15%

oesign

l 45%

,7 7 =j;g <

LMfg.p l gyp ~

Maint.

12 %

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the LERs by event date broken down by Root Cause Code for each of the past eighteen months from May 1997, through October 31, 1998. To be consistent with the Preventable / Personnel Error LERs indicator, this indicator is reported by the LER event date, as I opposed to the LER report date.

l The cause codes are intended to identify possible programmatic deficiencies. For detailed I descriptions of these codes, see the " Performance Indicator Definitions" section of this report.

NOTE: Due to the way LERs are tracked & reported, this indicator is one-month behind.There was one event in October 1998 that resulted in an LER. There were no missed surveillance tests resulting in LERs during October 1998. The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goal for this indicator is 0.

Data Source: Frans/Matzke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy I Trend: None SEP 60 & 61

[

(

27 g

l 1mirNcwtsau 1998McVidators

_al _

l 3 12 -

G

-. A ,/' 10 -

g. J

f

'0' '

--- 4 2 2 2

of 1

5- 2 4 3 3 2- 1 1 1 o o 1

0 o 0 -o,-

fgg

, - r ,

o B,E,a m'rs, r

,9g3 g y

~ g ,",-,

l Jm Rb Mr Apr Why An di Ag hp Q1 Ptw De l 1

! M6 + @NM-WMhh mhtrtHyWiedans -1998RrtChihanTdal -*-It@nlVEhntQarte VIOLATION TREND This indicator depicts the current year of cited violation data plus the past year of violation data for Fort Calhoun Station. Also depicted is the Region IV upper quartile for the current and past yrar.

The following inspection reports noting violations were issued during November 1998:

Violation Level IER No. Title (0) 98-21 Resident inspection no violations or deviations (1) IV 98-24 Radiation Protection Pro 3._m To date, OPPD has received eleven violations for inspection reports issued in 1998.

Level lli Violations 0 Level IV Violations _11 Total 11 The 1998 Fort Calhoun Station Goal for this performance indicator is to be at or below the cited violation trend for the upper quartile plants in Region IV.

j Data Source: Frans/Cavanaugh (Manager / Source)

! Accountability: Frans l Trcnd: None I

28

COST Goal: Operate Fort Calhoun Station in a manner that ccst effectively maintains nuclear generation as an economically viable contribution to OPPD's bottom line. Cost consciousness is exhibited at all levels of the organization.

29

1 12 Msnth Ralling Avoraga

-*-- Actual -as- Budget --o-- Plan 4.00 3.50 4 .:- :- : ._; l 8 '"' = =

_= = = = =-= l

~ ~

2.50 2.00 1.50 ,

l 1.00 - 4 *-+-4-+ e__ ~ i aaaaaaaasaaaaaE aagg * *a kkkkkA$kkikn!k8kk CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR !

October 1998 The purpose of this indicator is to quantify the economical operation of Fort Calhoun Station. The Cents Per Kilowatt Hour indicator represents the budget and actual cents per kilowatt hour on a 12-month rolling average for the current year. The basis for the budget curve is the approved 1998 revised budget. The basis for the actual curve is the Financial and Operating Report.

The December 31 amounts are also shown for the prior years 1993 through 1997. In addition, the report shows the plan am:unts for the years 1999 through 2002 for reference. The basis for the dollars are the Nuclear Long Rar:ge Financial Plz.n and the 1998 Corporate Planning and Budget Review. The basis for the generation is provided by Nuclear Fuels.

The 12-month rolling average unit price period of ( November 1997 through October 1998) averaged above budget )

due to the extended refueling outage and less generation during the period. The 12 month rolling average is 3.20 cents per kilowatt hour.

The year-to-date (YTD) average is trending in a positive direction.

Cents per KWH Jan Feb Mar Aor May Jun Jul Aua Seo Oct Nov Dec Budget YTD 3.02 2.85 3.27 4.13 3.80 3.53 3.37 3.21 3.13 3.08 3.01 2.96 Actual 2.96 2.85 3.00 3.26 4.16 4.39 4.03 3.77 3.59 3.20 Projected YTD 3.40* 3.30* 3.22*

NOTE: This information lags by a month due to the short tum around required for processing.

Projected numbers reflect the values for YTD if the plant is to operate within budgets for the remaining period of the year.

l l Data Source: Gayoso/ Huang (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gayoso/ Huang Trend: Needing Incresed Management Attention 30 l

u--~..... .a.. n..- - . . . + . . . . . . . . - . - , . - - - . _ ~ . . - , - . - - - - - . . - . - . . _ _ - . . . _ _ . . . . . - - . . . - - - . . ~ . - - - - - . - _ - - - - - -- .

i t

i i

DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT l PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 3

Goal: Achieve high standards at Fort Calhoun Station resulting in safe, reliable and cost effective power production.

l 1

i I

i j

i i 31

I m Corrective C alnte na nce m Preventive Malntenance C"""3 Non-Corre a tive/Pla nt im prove m e nte Corrective Maintena nc e Goal (2 00) 900 --

808 773 800 - 692 696 723 732 866 0 - 838 867 622 516 500 -

400 - 332 300 t 200 -

100 -

0 - + + M -e a- +- + E --e + --s +'+ +-H Non Outa0e W ainte na nc e W ork Doc um e nt Ba c kloO 3 TotalMWDs PERCENT OF MWD's PAsT GOAL BY PRIORITY MWD PRIORITY Priority 2 Priority 1 %

600 100%

500- p 400 - 69%

300 -

200 - 118 77 Priority 4 100 - 18

O-1

=+E-+ +aH Priorily Priority Priorty Priorty Priorty 1 2 3 4 5 MAINTENANCE WORKLOAD BACKLOG This indicator shows the backlog of non-outage Maintenance Work Documents remaining open at the end of the reporting month,a breakdown by maintenance classification and priority. The 1998 goal for this indicator is 200 non-outage corrective maintenance MWDs. The current backlog of corrective MWDs is 46 totals include a manual count of RAMS v *k orders. Currently RAMS can not be queried for a report. The minual count in RAMS is subject to error. Non-outage maintenance completion goals have been established es follows:

GQal Priority 1 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months Priority 2 7 days Priority 3 30 days Priority 4 90 days Priority 5 As resources permit Note: Data provided is the most accurate available; until Rams is capable of generating reports.

D:ta Source: Solymossy/ Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Clemens Tr:nd: None SEP 36 32

L m Ratio of Provantiva to Total M aintenance Fort Celhoun Goal 65%

100% ,

93%

75% 75% 74 % 77% 76 6 78%

72 %

70% , . 59% 59 % .

60% ~

50% '

40% g -

l' 30% .

20%

l i 10%

0% -- -r- m- - - -

-~ ~ --r-- ,- ,- - , - -

Dec Jan Feb Ma Apr May June J u ly Aug Sep Oct Now m Preventive Maintenance items Overdue Fort Calhoun Goal 2%

7%

6% -

5% -

4.01 %

~~3.05 3.03%

3% 2.60%

2.60%

2.40%

~

1.50 %

1%- .. .; 0.50 % O.70 *A 0 % --- = .+ + + + +S+ -+- + -v' +

a Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The top graph shows the ratio of completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance. The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 78% for the month of November 1998.

The lower graph shows the percentage of scheduled preventive maintenance items that were not completed by the late finish date. From the period of (October 15th thru November 15th) there were 10 PM's that wsre completed late or not completed out of 414 scheduled. The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goal for the percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue is a maximum of 2%.

Note: Data provided is the most accurate available; until Rams is capable of generating reports.

Data Source: Solymossy/ Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Clemens Trend: None SEP 41 & 44 33

Human Performance CRs(Maintenance)

B 20 -

18 l 16 16 -

I g 14 -

e I $ 12 11 a

y 10 -

I 0 o 8 7 6-4 3 I 2 2 2 2 1 1 0e + + + + + + + + ! 4- - H l - _

_ '* X'*"

PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS l

(MAINTENANCE) l This indicator shows the number of Condition Reports related to procedural noncompliance incidents assigned to the Maintenance Department.

I Data Source: Clemens/Burggraf (Manager / Source)

[ Accountability: Solymossy/Clemens Trend: None SEP 15,41 & 44

(

' 34

,g _ _ . -

M Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area l

1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (5%)

4 6% r 5% ~ 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.7%

1

, 4% -

i 3%

l l

2%

4 1% 4 i

j 0% -- + -+- + --+- -o -

+- -- -, -+- -+---H Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec i

4 l

! CONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA !

This indicator shows the percentage of the Radiologically Controlled Area (RCA) that ;

! is contaminated based on the total square footage of 70475. At the end of November 1998,

! the total contaminated area was 3312 square feet which is 4.7 percent of the RCA .

l The monthly FCS goal for 1998 is a Maximum of 5% Contaminated Area.

i Data Source: Solymossy/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Short i Trend: None SEP54 i

1 4

1

35 a

l

l m Monthly Poor R dution Worksr Practicas e Total PRWP for 1998

-- 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (<20) 25 18 18 18 18 18 15 14 11 10 ki 5 33 3 3 2

0 0 0 04 0 0 l 0 -

4- +- + + + + +- -

+- ---- 4-- - a l Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

! RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM l

l Tha Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor Radiological Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reporting month.

l Tha number of PRWPs which are identified each month should indirectly provide a means to

, qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance. This indicator needs increased management attention due to a 3 month increasing trend of poor radiation worker practices based on YTD.

During the month of November there were O PRWP identified.

Thcre have been a total of 18 Poor Radiation Worker Practices in 1998.

Tha 1998 FCS goal is <20 PRWPs, the 1997 goal was <15 PRWPs.

I Data Source: Solymossy/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Short Trend: Needing Increased Management Attention SEP52 i

I l

t l

I 36

m Documents Schsdul3d for R3visw m Document Reviews complete during month O Documents Overdue 300 250 200 -

i 150 -

1 100 4

j 50 --

0- + + + + + + + + + -+ ~

H

) Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June J uly Aug Sep Oct Nov 1997-1998 1

DOCUMENT REVIEW 1'

The Document Review indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater

than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month.The j documents reviews are performed in-house and include Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan, i Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual. ;

I During November 1998, there were 99 document reviews scheduled, while 44 reviews were completed. At the end of the month, there were O document reviews more than 6 months overdue.

There were 2 new documents initiated during November 1998.

Data Source: Ponec/Plath (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Ponec Trend: Positive SEP 46 l

37

. ,. _ . - . - - +

A J _ _. _ _

.____-___..__.____/_.,-

I .

/ N I ,, _. _ ._ .. . . A ., ___e ._ _ _

N._ _ _ - .. .-

,, 4 _

"-+

7-JAN FES MAR APH MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP oCT NOW DEC k 98 Loggables 98 Non-Loggables a 97 Loggables -'*'-' 97 Non-Loggables SECURITY INCIDENTS Tha Loggable and Non-Loggable incident (Security) Indicators are depicted in the chart above. The chart depicts the total number of loggable and non-loggable human error events and system failures which occurred during the reporting month.

During the month of November 1998, there were 13 loggable incidents and 5 non-loggable incidents identified (excluding access denials). Of all incidents identified this month five (5) were human error events. Of loggable events, only one (1) was a human performance error and twelve (12) were system failures. There were four (4) internal human performance errors in November. There was ona (1) non-loggable access denial during the reporting period. A committee comprised of security management and contract employees has been formed to evaluate departmental human parformance issues.

This indicator provides information on secur@ performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)

Itsm No. 58.

Data Source: Sefick/ Clark (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sefick Trand: None SEP 58 38

same Tenporary Modifications >1-fuelcycle old (RFO required for renoval) mes Tenporary Modifications >6 nonths old (Rerrovable on-line)

Fort Calhoun Goals for both Tenporary 2dii.ations' categories (0) 8-7 7-Dec Jan Feb Wr Apr Wy June July Aug Sept Oct Nov i

}

TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS This indicator provides information on the number of Temporary Modifications (TMs) greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage (RFO) for removal and the number of TMs removable on-line that are greater than six months old. The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goals for both of the TM categories are zero.

At the end of November 1998, there were no TMs that were greater than one-fuel cycle old requiring an outage for r:moval.

At the end of November 1998, there were seven (7) TM's installed that were greater than six months old which could be removed on-line. DCN #0006121 (TM 96-039), Railroad Siding / Corridor 26 Door, was installed November 1,1996. DCN

0006164 ( TM 97-021), CCW corrosion monitor, was installed February 18,1998. DCN #0006165 (TM 97-022), LPSI Huder Pressure Gauge at PT-325, was installed. December 12,1997. DCN #0006186 (TM 98-003), F1-1112, FW-54 Suction Flow Indicator, was installed March 16,1998. DCN #0006187 (TM 98-004), TPCW System Corrosion Monitor was l Installed March 24,1998. DCN #0006188 (TM 98-005), YlT 6286 A&B YlT 6288 A&B was installed February 27,1998.

DCN #0006197 (TM 98-014), FW-10 Speed Control Loop, was installed May 29,1998.

At the end of November 1998, there was a total of e,even (11) TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun Station. Three (3) of the eleven (11) installed TMs require a RFO for removal and eight (8) are removable on-line. In 1998, a total of twenty cne (21) TMs have been installed. At the end of November 1998, there were three (3) procedural or maintenance configuration alterations (PMCAs) (a special classification of TM) installed in the Fort Calhoun Station using PRC approved procedures which are controlled by Standing Order O-25.

l t

D:ta Source: Skiles/Plott (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skiles/ Core

, Trend: Adverse SEP 62&71 39 l

l #SSCs Exceeding Unavailability Criteria ' # SSCs Monitored

--*- % Exceeding Unavailability Criteria l I 6:_ 63 63 52

$ 51 \ 51 49 50

$ 3.0% !

g40 .

2.5%

@ 30 .

2.0%

$ 20 I

3 1.0%

Z 10 1

2 1 1 1 1 - 2 1 1[ 0.5% l 0 O.0%

l l

4-96 1-97 2-97 3-97 4 97 1-98 2-98 3-98 I Quarter !

l l

Maintenance Rule SSC Unavailability As of the third quarter of 1998, only one SSC, the non-safety related inverter, EE-4S, is i exceeding it's three year unavailability performance criteria. Performance is indicative of j success in Maintenance, Planning & Scheduling, and Operations efforts to control equipment l out of service time, i

l l

Data Source Skiles/Swearngin/ Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skiles Trend: Nons i

40 l

l-l O Total Requalification Training Hours E SimulatorTrainingHours E Non-RequalificationTrainingHours E Number of Exam Failures 35 -

33 32 - M 33 30 -

25 20 20 - 43 15 - 4 14 2 12 0 '

8g 8 8 8 8 88 1

3 ,

0 0 0 00 0 0 ;

O - r , r- --v r r- - '

Cycle 97 6 Cycle 97 7 Cycle 981 Cycle 98 2 Cycle 98-3 Cycle 98-4 Cycle 98-5 Cycle 98-6 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING This indicator provides information on the total number of hours of training given to each crew during each cycle. The simulator training hours shown on the graph are a subset of the total training hours. Non-Requalification Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP verification & validation, INPO commitments, GET, Fire Brigade, Safetu Meetings, and Division Manager lunches. :

Exam failures are defined as failures in the written, simulator, and Job Performance Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training.

Note: All examination failures were remediated without impacting the operations shift schedule.

D ta Source: Westcott/Guliani (Ma nager / Source)

Accountability: Westcott/Guliani Trend: None SEP 68

. l l

\

l 41

O SRO Ex:ms Administer d i

a SRO Exams Passed f M ROExams Administered (3 RO Exams Passed ;

18 18 18 15 :

122 12 12 12

)12 k L : 1 10

{

5- 44 ' 44 I i 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ;

O +---+ + --H -- t H -- t + -t + + a Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS - 1998 l This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Operator (RO) !

quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally administered quizzes and l cxams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates monthly progress.

During the month of October 1998 2 SRO and 6 RO candidates took the NRC Generic i Fundamentals examination in November NRC notifed OPPD that all candidates passed the examination. November 1998, there were 12 (SRO) exams administered and 18 (RO) exams administered.12 SRO exams were passed and 18 RO exams were passed.

l l

l 1

i Data Source: Westcott/Guliani (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Westcott/Guliani Trcnd: None SEP 68 42

[ ,

{ 0WSTONH LD E NS NOT YET ROCEESED 700- 645 0

( 600 -

500 - '. 390 400 MWD HOLDS 400- DATA UNAVAILABLE

( 13 57 300- 0 34 200 -

100-0-- ,

Sep-98 Cct-98 Nov-98 l

l

{

MWD PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 18 REFUELING OUTAGE) l This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Requests (MWRs) and Maintenance Work Documents (MWDs) that have been approved for inclusion in Cycle 18 RFO. This graph l indicates:

Parts Holds - Planning Complete, Awaiting Parts l

System Engineering Holds - Awaiting System Engineering input to Planning Planner Holds - Maintenance Planner has not completed planning the work package.

ECN Hold - Awaiting Substitute Replacement items ECN from DEN.

In Review- Planning Complete awating SE, ISI and QC review.

NOTE: Data unavailable due to RAMS conversion.

D:ta Source: Solymossy/ Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sollymossy/ Herman Trend: None SEP 31 i

l 43

I Ir a LAST a THIS O FOR SCHEDULE 100 -

90 80 -

70 60 t I ~

32 0- 25

' 20 22 20 - 15 18 12 14 12 12 12 12 12 12 1412 12 1212 12

. ,. -, .r ,. , ,. , -

M .0 8 $ 5 $ $ 3 S $

E E 2 e a e 9 9 1 a I E R

2 f

j

.o E E 3

ti 2

0 E

y g

I z

I c

$ 8

E 2 0 I $

8 g 2

j o

0 8 2 3 I m m

8 COMPONENT TESTING DEPARTMENT AND SPECIAL SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1999 OUTAGE PROJECTS STATUS REPORT u

E Data Source Skiles/Bloyd/Boughter (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Skiles/Bloyd/Boughter

[ Trend: None SEP 31

1999 Refueling Outage Mods PRC Approved - March 21,1999 100% , 90 %

1 80%

N 60% -

i ! 40% 30 %

o.

20% 5% 0% 0% 5% 10Yo 7

0% 0% 0%

I 0% t- r- r " ,- r c", Er2 . .E E

o Q

o D

o o o o o o

o 8 $ $ $

o o o o I b h $ $ h h h h h h h Modifications l E Percent Complete l

l PROGRESS OF 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE MODIFICATIONS CYCLE 19 l This indicator shows the status of Modifications approved for installation during the Cycle 19 Refueling Outage (September 1999).

The goal for this indicator is to have all modification packages which were approved for accomplishment prior to September 25,1998, PRC approved by March 21,1999.

I November 1998 Modifications added: 0 Deleted = 0 I

I Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 31

{

[

45 J

{

There Have Been No MODS or ECNs added since Freeze Date PROGRESS OF CYCLE 19 0UTAGE MODS AND ECN'S ADDED TO 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE AFTER FREEZE DATE This indicator will show the status of Modifications and ECN's approved for installation during the Cycle 19 Refueling Outage. The goal for this indicator is to have all modification packages PRC approved by their target date. Target date is September 25,1998.

November 1998 Modifications /ECN's Added = 0 Deleted = 0 Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 33 46 I

I Progress of 98 on-line I 102% ---

mPercent Complete u Target Approw Date

-- 11/21/98 I 100% -

98%

96% ~

u

- 11/1/98 10/12/98

-- 9/22/98 94% - 9/2/98 92% - 8/13/98 90% - - 7/24/98 88% - - 7/4/98 86% - -

6/14/98 84% - 4 +4 ++ + : : H+-+ l l +-++--4 , 5/25/98 hh2$$5$

usittit 2255555 mmmmw I

I PROGRESS OF 1998 ON-LINE MODIFICATION PLANNING This indicator shows the status of modifications approved or in review for approval for on-line installation during 1998.

The goal for this indicator is to have all MOD /ECN packages approved by their scheduled date.

November 1998 MOD /ECN Added:0 Deleted: 0 I

Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 31 L

h W

47

1 I

I I

ACTION PLANS I

i SEP INDEX l

1

[

48 r

ACTION PLANS u This section lists action plans that have been developed for the performance indicators cited as Adverse Trends during the month preceding this report. Also included are Action Plans for indicators that have been cited in the preceding month's report as Needing increased Management Attention in accordance with Revision 5 of NOD-QP-37, for three (3) consecutive months.

I . Temporary Modifications (page 39)

Adverse Trends Based on the current trend of Temporary Modifications >6 months old (removable on-line) the Temporary Modifications Indicator is classified as "Needs increased Management Attention". Presently, there are six (6) Temporary Modifications l which have been installed greater than six months. An action plan has been developed to expedite removal of the TMs and increase management's awareness of the issue. System Engineering will be actively pursuing resolution on closure of these Temporary Modifications.

Mendina increased Manaaement Attention I e Emergency AC Power (page 15)

This indicator was high in July and August due to planned maintenance. For the first time, diesel refueling frequency tasks were performed on line. Approximately 60 hours6.944444e-4 days 0.0167 hours 9.920635e-5 weeks 2.283e-5 months was required on each diesel for on line maintenance. The decision to perform on-line maintenance was a management decision with full knowledge that unavailability would increase. It is I Expected that unavailability will go down to previous low levels for the next 12 months.

Collective Radiation Exposure (page 19)

Fort Calhoun management is fully aware of the Station approaching the 1998 Collective Radiation Exposure total dose goal of l 224 person-Rem. The following actions have been taken at Fort Calhoun Station to ensure all personnel are aware of this goal:

The distribution of "FCS On-Line" newsletter which explained the Collective Radiaation Exposure goal and reinforced ALARA concepts to personnel.

I

Development of an expectation by the Radiation Protection Department in which radiaion workers are expected to know radiological conditions and RWP requirements before entering the Radiologically Controlled Area instead of relying on the Radiation Protection staff to provide that information.

=

A Radiation Worker Enhancement Program is being instituted at Fort Calhlun Station to improve radiation I worker knowledge and practices.

The 1998 Collective Radiation Exposure goal will be a challenge for Fort Calhoun Station to meet, but the actions stated above will help mitigate the chance of exceeding the goal.

Clean Controlled Area Contaminations (page 25)

The Routine Decon Schedule was revised to improve the daily maintenance of clean areas in the RCA. A status sheet with a sign-off will provide administrative guidance and controls to ensure clean areas are being properly maintained by a designated r:sponsible person. These improvements should result in less Clean Controlled Area Contaminations.

Cents Per Kilowatt Hour (page 30)

The increased cost has been due to the unexpected refueling outage extension which also caused the higher expenditures End the less power generated. Nuclear Planning Department has initiated cost awareness efforts by distributing the monthly l update on power generation, OIM cost and Capital cost to all nuclear departments and year-to-date cost data to all nuclear personnel. In addition, the Nuclear organization is developing the 1999 Business Plan based on the Six Factor Formula -

CHOICE to address the issues and actions on safe operations, high performance and competitive cost. The effectiveness of the Business Plan will be evaluated routinely by the nuclear management team.

Radiological Work Practices Program (page 36)

Changes in the initial General Employee Training (GET) Program are being addressed by a Training Advisory Committee to make program improvements. The On-Line Poor Radiation Worker Practices were recently identifed by CR 199801434. Implementation I of the Actions items listed below are being addressed by the Condition Report, which should result in an increased awareness for improving Rad Worker Pracitices in the RCA.

Define the role of the Shift RP Technician to reduce over relianace on the RP Staff and ensure Rad Workers have sufficient knowledge prior to accessing the RCA.

I .

Perform a Human Performance evaluation of the Survey Maps used by the Rad Workers.

~

Evaluate the effectiveness of the postings u.sedin the RCA.

Evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of the information provided at ch RCA Access Control Point.

Ensure the RP Shift Tech has the appropiate information available.

Evaluate the content and methods of the GET Program.

[ Evaluate the effectiveness of the postings usedin the RCA.

49

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATOR INDEX 4) Critical means that during the steady-state condrtion of the reactor prior to the scram, the This indicator index is calculated from a weighted effective multiplication (k ,, ) was essentially combination of eleven performance indicator values, equal to one ( Page 12) which include the following: Unit Capability Factor, Unplanned Capability Loss Factor, HPSI, AFW, HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM Emergency AC Power System Unplanned Automatic SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE Scrams, Collective Radiation Exposure. Fuel Reliability, Thermal Performance, Secondary System Chemistry, and The sum of the known (planned and unplanned)

Industrial Safety Accident Rate. unavailable hours and the estimated unavailable hours for

( Page 6 ) the high pressure safety injection system for the reporting period divided by the critical hours for the reporting period UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR multiplied by the number of trains in the high pressure safety injection system. (Page 13)

The ratio of the available energy generation over a given time period to the reference energy generation (the energy AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM that could be produced if the unit were operated PERFORMANCE continuously at full power under reference chient I

conditions) over the same time period, e) ressed as a The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) percentage. ( Page 10 ) unavailable hours and the estimated unavailable hours for the auxiliary feedwater system for the reporting period UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR divided by the critical hours for the reporting period I The ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a given period of time, to the reference energy generation (the multiplied by the number of trains in the auxiliary feedwater aystem.

( Page 14 )

energy that could be produced if the unit were operated I continuously at full power under reference ambient conditions) over the same time period, expressed as a percentage. ( Page 11 )

EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE I UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7,000 CRITICAL HOURS The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) unavailable and the estimated unavailable hoursfor the emergency AC power system for the reporting period divided by the number of hours in the reporting period I This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned Cutomatic scrams (RPS logic actuations) that occur per 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months of critical operation.

multiplied by the number of trains in the emergency AC power system.( Page 15)

THERMAL PERFORMANCE I The value for this indicator is calculated by multiplying the total number of unplanned automatic reactor scrams in a specific time period by 7,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months , then dividing that The ratio of the design gross heat rate (corrected) to the adjusted actual gross heat rate, expressed as a percentage.

number by the total number of hours entical in the same ( Page 16)

I time period. The indicator is further defined as follows:

1) Unplanned means that the scram was not an FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR 3 anticipated part of a planned test. This indicator is defined as the steady-state primary coolant I l-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contribution

2) Scram means the automatic shutdown of the and normalized to a common purification rate. Tramp reactor by a rapid insertion of negative reactivity uranium is fuel which has been deposited on reactor core I (e.g., by control rods, liquid injection system, etc.)

that is caused by actuation of the reactor protection system. The signal may have resulted intemals from previous defective fuel or is present on the surface of fuel elements from the manufac'uring process.

Steady state is defined as continuous operation for at least from exceeding a set point or spurious. three days at a power level that does not vary more than +

I 3) Automatic means that the initial signal that caused actuation of the reactor protection system or -5%. Plants should collect data for this indicator at a power level above 85%, when possible. Plants that did not operate at steady-state power above 85% should collect logic was provided from one of the sensor's data for this indicator at the highest steady-state power level I monitoring plant parameters and conditions, rather than the manual scram switches or, attained during the month, The density correction factor is the ratio of the specific manual turbine trip switches (or volume of coolant at the RCS operating temperature (540 I push-buttons) provided in the main controlroom. degrees F., Vf = 0.0217) divided by the specific volume of 50

l PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS coolant at normal letdown temperature (120' F at outlet of also shows the volume of low-level radioactive waste which the letdown cooling heat exchanger, Vf = 0.0163), which is in temporary storage, the amount of radioactive oil that results in a density correction factor for FCS equal to 1.33. has been shipped off-site for processing, and the volume of

( Page 17 ) solid dry radioactive waste which has been shipped off-site for processing. Low-level solid radioactive waste consists of p SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms

[ INDEX generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance. Dry radioactive waste includes contaminated The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) is a calculation rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, based on the concentration of key impurities in the plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of

( secondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the at a low-level radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, most likely cause of deterioration of the steam generators. sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all Criteria for calculating the CPI are: radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of

{ spent fuel processing. This indicator tracks radiological work

1) The plant is at greater than 30 percent power; and performance for SEP #54. ( Page 21 )

2) the power is changing less than 5% per day. RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY f RATE The CPI is calculated using the following equation:

The number of injuries requiring more than normal first aid

[ CPI = ((sodium /0.79) + (Chloride /1.52) +(Sulfate /1.44) + per 200,000 man-hours worked. This indicator trends

[ (Iron /3.30) + (Copper /0.30)+(Condensate 02/2.90))/6 personnel performance for SEP #15,25 and 26.

Where: Sodium, sulfate, chloride and condensate dissolved ( Page 24 )

cxygen are the monthly average blowdown concentrations in ppb, iron and copper are monthly time weighted average CLEAN CONTROLLED AREA CONTAMINATIONS 21,000

[ feedwater concentrations in ppb. The denominator for eaof DISINTEGRATIONS / MINUTE PER PROBE AREA the five factors is the INPO median value. If the monthly cverage for a specific parameter is less than the INPO The personnel contamination events in the clean controlled

( median value, the median value is used in the calculation.

( Page 18) area. This indicator tracks personnel performance for SEP

15 & 54. ( Page 25 )

COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE PREVENTABLE / PERSONNEL ERROR LERs Collective radiation exposure is the total extemal whole-body This indicator is a breakdown of LERs. For purposes of LER event dose received by all on-site personnel (including classification, a

Preventable LER"is defined as:

contractors and visitors) during a time period, as measured

( by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). Collective An event for which the root cause is personnel error (i.e.,

inappropriate action by one or more individuals), inadequate rrdiation exposure is reported in units of person-rem. This administrative controls, a design construction, installation, indicator tracks radiological work performance for SEP #54. Installation, fabrication problem (involving work completed by or

( Page 19) supervised by OPPD personnel) or a maintenance problem (attnbuted to inadequate or improper upkeep / repair of plant INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT AND DISABLING equipment). Also, the cause of the event must have occurred INJURY /lLLNESS RATE within approximately two years of the " Event Date" specrfied in the

{ LER (e g., an event for which the cause is attributed to a problem The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in with the original design of the plant would not be considered improving industrial safety performance for utility personnel preventable).

[ permanently assigned to the station. Contractor work-hours i cre not included in this indicator. Also, this indicator is For purposes of LER event classification, a " Personnel defined as the number of accidents for all utility personnel Error" LER is defined as follows:

permanently assigned to the station, involving days away An event for which the root cause is inappropriate action from work per 200,000 man-hours worked (100 man-years). on the part of one or more individuals (as opposed to

{ This does not include contractor personrel. This indicator being attributed to a department or a general group).

trrcks personnel performance for SEP #25,26 & 27. Also, the inappropriate action must have ormnrred within (Page 20 ) approximately two years of the " Event Date'specified in f the LER. Additionally, each event classified as a

] VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE " Personnel Error" should also be classified as

" Preventable." This indicator trends personnel This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid performance for SEP ltem #15.

radioactive waste actually shipped for burial. This indicator ( Page 26 )

e L 51 i . .

l l'

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE plant istrended over 12 months (lagging the Fort BREAKDOWN CalhounStation trend by 2-3 months). It is the FortCalhoun Station goal to be at or below the cited violation trend for This indicator shows the number and root cause code for thetopquartileRegion IV plant.

I Licensee Event Reports. The root cause codes are as follows:

1) Administrative Contro! Problem -

( Page 28 )

CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR Management and supervisory deficiencies that affect plant programs or activities (i.e., poor planning, breakdown or lack The purpose of this indicator is to quantify the economical of adequate management or supervisory control, incorrect operation of Fort Calhoun Station. The cents per kilowatt procedures, etc). hour indicator represents the budget and actual cents per I 2) Licensed Operator Error - This cause code captures errors of omission / commission by licensed reactor operators during plant kilowatt hour on a twelve-month average for the current year.

The basis for the budget curve is the approved yearly budget. The basis for the actual curve is the Financial and Operating Report, activities. ( Page 30 )

3) Other Personnel Error- MAINTENANCE WORKLOAD BACKLOG Errors of omission / commission committed by non-licensed personnel involved in plant This indicator shows the backlog of non-outage Maintenance activities. Work Documents remaining open at the end of the reporting F month. Maintenance classifications are defined as follows:

% Maintenance Problem - The intent of this cause code is to capture the full range of Corrective - Repair and restoration of equipment or problems which can be attributed in any way to components that have failed or are malfunctioning and are programmatic deficiencies in the maintenance not performing their intended function.

functional organization. Activities included in this category are maintenance, testing, Preventive - Actions taken to maintain a piece of equipment surveillance, calibration and radiation within design operating conditions, prevent equipment protection. failure, and extend its life and are performed prior to equipment failure.

5) Design / Construction / Installation / Fabrication Problem - Non-Corrective / Plant improvements - Maintenance This cause code covers a full range of activities performed to implement station improvements or programmatic deficiencies in the areas of to repair non-plant equipment.

design, conskuction, installation, and fabrication (i.e., loss of control power due to Maintenance Work Priorities are defined as:

underrated fuse, equipment not qualified for the environment, etc.). Emergency - Conditions which significantly degrade station safety or availability.

6) Equipment Failures (Electronic Piece-Parts or Environmental-Related Failures)- Immediate Action - Equipment deficiencies which This code is used for spurious failures of significantly degrade station reliability. Potential for unit electronic piece-parts and failures due to shutdown or power reduction.

meteorological conditions such as lightning, ice, high winds, etc. Generally, it includes Operations Concern - Equipment deficiencies which hinder spurious or one-time failures. Electric station operation.

f components included in this category are mut cards, rectifiers, bistables, fuses, capacitors, Essential - Routine corrective maintenance on essential diodes, resistors, etc.In addition this indicator station systems and equipment.

, reports SEP # 6 & 61. (Page 27)

{ Non-Essential - Routine corrective maintenance on non-VIOLATION TREND essential station systems and equipment.

This indicator is defined as Fort Calhoun Station Cited Plant Improvement - Non-corrective maintenance and plant Violations and Non-Cited Violations trended over 12 months. improvements.This indicator tracks maintenance Additionally, CitedViolations for the top quartile Region IV performance for SEP #36. ( Page 32 )

52

j PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE &

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The ratio of preventive maintenance (including surveillance 1) Temporary configwtion', are defined as testing and calibration procedures) to the sum of norH)utage electrical jumpers, e'ectrical blocks, g c rrective maintenance and preventive maintenance mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks

[ completed over the reporting period. The ratio, expressed which are installed in the plant operating as a percentage, is calculated based on man-hours. Also systems and are not shown on the latest displayed are the percent of preventive maintenance items revision of the P&lD, schematic, connection, in the month that were not completed or administratively wiring, or flow diagrams.

closed by the scheduled date plus a grace period equal to 2) Jumpers and blocks which are installed for 25% of the scheduled interval.This indicator tracks Surveillance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, preventive maintenance activities for SEP #41. ( Page 33 ) Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures or Operating Procedures are not considered as PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS temporary modifications unless the jumper or (MAINTENANCE) block remains in place after the test or procedure is complete. Jumpers and blocks The number of identified incidents conceming maintenance installed in test or lab instruments are not procedural problems, the number of closed irs related to the considered as temporary modifications, use of procedures (includes the number of closed irs 3) Scaffold is not considered a temporary caused by procedural noncompliance), and the number of modification. Jumpers and blocks which are closed procedural noncompliance irs. This indicator trends installed and for which Mrs have been personnel performance for SEP #15, 41 and 44. ( Page 34) submitted will be considered as temporary modifications until final resolution of the MR CONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA and the jumper or block is removed or is permanently recorded on the drawings. This The percentage of the Radiation Controlled Area, which indicator tracks temporary modifications SEP includes the auxiliary building, the radwaste building, and #62 and 71, ( Page 39) treas of the C/RP building, that is contaminated bar.ed on the total square footage. This indicator tracks poormance LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING for SEP #54. ( Page 35)

The total number of hours of training given to each crew RADIOLOGICAL WORM PRACTIF4S PROGRAM during each cycle. Also provided are the simulator training hours (which are a subset of the total training hours), the The number of identified poor radiological work practices number of non-REQUALIFICATION training hours and the (PRWPs) for the reporting month. This indicator tracks number of exam failures. This indicator tracks training radiological work performance for SEP #52. ( Page 36) performance for SEP # 68. ( Page 41)

DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL) LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS The Document Review Indicator shows the number of This indicator shows the number of SRO and/or RO quizzes documents reviewed, the number of documents scheduled and exams that are administered and passed each month.

f:r review, and the number of document reviews that are This indicator tracks training performance for SEP #68.

overdue for the reporting month. A document review is ( Page 42) c nsidered overdue if the review is not complete within six months of the assigned due date. This indicator tracks MWD PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 19 REFUELING performance for SEP #46. ( Page 37 ) OUTAGE)

SECURITY INCIDENTS This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Requests (MWRs) and Maintenance Work Documents The total number of secunty incidents for the reporting (MWDs) that have been approved for inclusion in the Cycle month depicted in two graphs. This indicator tracks security 18 Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance #31 >

performance for SEP #58. ( Page 38) ( Page 43)

TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS The number of temporary mechanical and electrical configurations to the plant's systems.

53 l

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS COMPONENT TESTINr 1EPARTMENT AND SPECIAL f SERVICES ENGINEERING 19980UTAGE PROJECTS STATUS REPORT r This indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31.

t ( Page44)

PROGRESS OF 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE MODIFICATIONS CYCLE 19 This indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31. ( Page 46)

PROGRESS OF CYCLE 19 OUTAGE MODS AND ECN'S f ADDED TO '99 REFUELING OUTAGE AFTER FREEZE DATE This indicator will show the status of Modifications and ECN's approved for installation during the Cycle 19 Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance for SEP

33.

( Page 46)

Progress of 1998 On-Line modification Planning

( This indicator shows the status of modifications approved or in review for approval for on-line installation during 1998.

This indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31.

( Page 47 )

f

(

{

l I

l 54 f

l. .. .. .s..

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM lNDEX The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators Index is to list performance indicators related to SEP items with parameters that can be trended.

SEP Reference Number 15 Ease e increase HPES and IR Accountability through use of Performance Indicators Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . . .. . ... . . . . . 34 Recordable injury /illnass Cases Frequency Rate . . . .. . . . . . . 24 Clean Controlled Area Contaminations >1,000 Disintegrations / Minute Per Probe Area .. . . 25 Preventable / Personnel Error LERs . . ... . ...... . ... .. .. .. .. 26 m SEP Reference Numbers 25. 26. & 27

Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented I e Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements e implement Supervisory Enforcement of Industrial Safety Standards industrial Safety Accident and Disabling injury / Illness Rate . .. . . . , .. 20 Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . . .. .. . . 24 SEP Reference Number 31

= Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWD Planning Status (Cycle 19 Refueling Outage) . .. . .. . .. .. ... 47 Component Testing Department, Special Services Engineering Department 1998 Outage Projects . . 48 Progress of 1999 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 19 .. .. .. .. . . 49 Progress of 1998 On-Line Modification Planning . .. . ... . .. 51 SEE.Beference Number 33 '

Develop On ' ine Maintenance and Modification Schedule Progress of Cycle 19 Outage MODS and ECN's Added to '99 Refueling Outage After Freeze Date . 50 SEP Reference Number 36

= Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Workload Backlogs (Corrective Non-Outage) . . .. . 32 SEP Reference Numbers 31 & 44 l e Develop and implemer,t a Preventive Maintenance Schedule e Compliance With and Use of Procedures Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance & Preventive Maintenance items Overdue . 33 Procedural Noncomplia nce Incidents (Maintenance) . . . . . 34 SEP Reference Number 46

{ Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program Document Review . . .. . .. . . . . . . 37 u 55

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX SEP Reference Number 52 Eaga e Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices Rad.cogical Work Practices Program . . .. . . ... ... . 36 SEP Reference Number 54 e Complete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program I Collective Radiation Exposure . . .

... 19 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste . . .. . . . . 21 Clean Controlled Area Disintegrations 21,000 Counts / Minute Per Probe Area . . 25 l Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area . . . . . . .. . 35 SEP Reference Number 58 I e Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program Security incidents ... . . . .. . .. 38 SEP Reference Numbers 60 & 61 e improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program e Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests I Licensee Report LER Root Cause Breakdown Number of Missed Surveillance Tests resulting in Licensee Event Reports . . .. . 27 SEP Reference Number 62

. Establish Interim System Engineers Temporary Modifications . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . 39 Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown . . . . . . . . 41 Engineering Change Notice Status . . ... ... 42 Engineering Change Notices Open .. ... . . .. . . . . 43 SEP Reference Number 68 e Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and establish means to monitor Operator Training License Operator Requalification Training .. .. . . . . 45 License Candidate Exams . .. . .. .. 46 l SEP Reference Number 71 e improve Controls over Temporary Modifications Temporary Modifications . . . . . .. . . 39

(

56

l Fort Calhoun Station Operating l Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates '

l EVENT l DATE RANGE l PRODUCTION (MWH) l CUMULATIVE (MWH) ]

Cycle 7 12/21/81-12/03/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 Cycle 8 04/06/83-03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 .

Cycle 9 07/12/84-09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 '

Cycle 10 01/16/86-03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 i Cycle 11 Cycle 12 06/08/87-09/27/88 01/31/89-02/17/90 4,936,859 3,817,954 41,771,505 45,589,459 I Cycle 13 05/29/90-02/01/92 5,451,069 51,040,528 4

Cycle 14 05/03/92-09/25/93 4,981,485 56,022,013 Cycle 15 11/26/93-02/20/95 5,043,887 61,065,900 Cycle 16 04/14/95-10/05/96 5,566,108 66,632,007 Cycle 17 11/25/97-04/01/98 5,183,t !B 71,815,678 Cycle 18 06/04/98-10/02/99 l CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS " RECORDS" First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47p.m.)

First Electricity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH) September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%) May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 Days) June 8,1987-September 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800 KWH) October 1987 I

l Most Productive Fuel Cycle (5,451,069 MWH-Cycle 13)

Shortest Refueling Outage (53 days)

May 29,1990-February 1,1992 February 20,1995-April 14,1995 October 4,1996-November 27,96 I

l I

n l

Milestone Schedule 1999 OUTAGE MILESTONE WEEKS PRIOR MILESTONE STATUS TO START DUE DATE

1. Mod, ECN, & Project (approved for planning) Freeze Date 79 MAR 6 '98 Complete

2. System Window Structure Finalized 63 JUN 26 '98 Complete

3. " Backbone" Schedule Developed & lssued 60 JUL 17 '98 Complete

4. Begin System Window meetings 57 AUG 7 '98 Complete

5. Shift Outege Managers identified 57 AUG 7 '98 Complete

6. Mod & ECN (approved for accomplishment) Freeze Date 52 SEPT 11 '98 Complete

7. Special Project (approved for accomplishment) Freeze Date 44 NCN/ 20 '98 Complete

8. PMO and ST Freeze Date 40 DEC 18 '98

9. Preliminary Project Schedule Due Date (all Outage Projects) 34 JAN 29 '99

10. Modification Final Design Package Due Date 26 MAR 26 '99

11. Overall Outage Scope Freeze Date 26 MAR 26 '99

12. Complete System Window Review Meetings 26 MAR 26 '99

13. Modification & ECN Plan & Schedule Due Date 16 JUN 4 '99

14. Project Plan & Schedule Due Date 16 JUN 4 '99

15. Preliminary Outage Schedule issued 12 JUL 2 '99

16. Outage Management Team Identified 12 JUL 2 '99

17. Modification & ECN Construction Work Order Due Date 9 JUL 16 '99 58

Milestone Schedule 1999 OUTAGE MILESTONE WEEKS PRIOR MILESTONE STATUS TO START DUE DATE

18. Resource Availabilities identified 8 JUL 23 '99

19. Issue Final Detailed Outage Schedule for Review 6 JUL 23 '99

20. Maintenance Work Orders " Ready to Work" 4 AUG 20 '99

21. All Material and Parts for the Frozen Outage scope On-Site 4 AUG 20 '99

22. Management Meeting to Approve Final Outage Schedule 4 AUG 20 '99

23. NSRG and Operations Review (and approval) of Schedule 4 AUG 20 '99

24. ALARA Package, Radiation Work Permits and Tagouts Comp.1 SEPT 10 '99

25. Breakers Open 0 SEPT 18 '99 I

59 .

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR SOURCES WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ARE IN BLUE Indicator Source Extension INPO Noteworthy /Significant Events .. . . Donna Guinn 6937 Unit Capability Factor Unplanned Capability Factor Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams per 7000 Hours Critical .. .. . Mike Edwards 6929 High Pressure Safety injection System Safety System Performance .

Chuck Schaffer 6830 Auxiliary feedwater System Safety System Performance . . .. Craig Fritts 6554 Emergency AC Power System Safety System Performance . . Rich Ronning 6887 Thermal Performance . . . . . Kevin Naser 6889 Fuel Releability Indicator . .. . . .. . . . Rich Roenigk 7214 Secor.dary System Chemistry . . . .. Mark Ostien 7109 Inductrial Safety Accident & Disabling injuryllliness (Lost Time Accident Rate)

Rscordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate . . . Duane Booth 6558 Collective Radiation Exposure Clasn Controlled Area Contaminations Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area Radiological work Practices Program .. .. Colette Williams 7163 Volume of Low-Level Radioactive Waste . . . Mark Breuer 7193 Ptsventable/ Personnel Error LERs Licensee Event Report (LER) Root Cause Breakdown . . .. .. Erick Metzke 6855 Violition Trend . . . . . . Gary Cavanaugh 6913 Milntenance Rule SSC Unavailability . Steve Swearngin 6836 Csnts Per Kilowatt Hour .. .

. Claudio Huang 6626 60 w-

MONTHLY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR SOURCES

_lndicator Source Extension Maintenance Workload Backlog Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance Preventive Maintenance items Overdue MWD Planning Status (Cycle 18 Refueling Outage) .. . . .... . . Martin Johnson 6956 Parsonnel Error Rate Procedural Noncompilance Incidents (Maintenance) . ... .. . Mike Burggraf 6675 Document Review . . . . . .. . .. . .. .. . .. Judy Plath 7370 Security Incidents . . . .. .... ... . .. .. . Al Clark 6666 Temporary Modifications . . . . . . Russ Plott 6557 Outstanding Modifications i Progress of 1999 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 19 Progress of Cycle 19 Outage MODS and ECNS Added to 1999 Rsfueling Outage After Freeze Date I Progress of 1998 ON-Line Modification Planning .. . .

Pat Walling 6950 Engineering Assistance F.equest Breakdown 1 Engineering Change Notice Status Engineering Change Notice Open . . .. .. ... .. . .. . . Bemie Livingston 3870 Licensed Operator Requalification Training License Candidate Exams-1998 . . . .. Greg Guliani 6025 I Component Testing Department and Special Services Engineering Department 1999 Outage Projects Status Report Chris Boughter 6684

[

{

61

.

ML20198M314

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

=:= == sumermessumuse := =r = === = = ==: ==c========

Navigation menu

Search