ML20237E964

Performance Indicators Rept for Jul 1998

ML20237E964
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	07/31/1998
From:	OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:
Shared Package
ML20237E963	List: LIC-98-0117, Forwards Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Rept for Jul 1998 ML20237E964
References
NUDOCS 9809010345
Download: ML20237E964 (65)

Text

OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION f' &*" ,S' '{ _h 5

~ , h O

a

., 4

[p7 di, ji; "

yg.

h%nf N# --

l:

-g m PERFORMANCE INDICATORS JULY 1998 SAFE OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE COST EFFECTIVENESS jaa"iPeitPe*fp

Table of Contents / Summary ease TABLE OF CONTENTS /

SUMMARY

,.. . . . . .1 l MONTHLY

SUMMARY

REPORT . . . . ... . .. .4 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX TREND . . . . . . .. .5 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX INDICATOR ,, . .. .6 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT

SUMMARY

, .. . . . .7 INPO NOTEWORTHY / SIGNIFICANT EVENTS . . . . ..8 WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Unit Capability Factor . . ... . . . . . . .. .10 Unplanned Capability Loss Factor .. . . . . . . . . . 11 Unplanned Automatic Reactor SCRAMS per 7000 Hours .. . .12 High Pressure Safety Injection System . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .13 Auxiliary Feedwater System . . . . .. . .. . ..14 Emergency AC Power System . . .. . . . .15 Thermal Performance .. . .. . . . . . . . .16 Fuel Reliability Indicator .. ... ...17 Secondary System Chemistry . . .. .. .. . .. . . .. .18 Collective Radiation Exposure . . . .. .. . . . .. . . . .19 Industrial Safety Accident anJ Disabling injury / Illness Rate . . . .20 Volume of Low Level Radioactive Waste . .. . . . . . . 21 SAFE OPERATIONS Error Rate . . . .

. . . . . .23 Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . .

. . . .24 Clean Controlled Area Contaminations

>1,000 Disintegrations / Minute per Probe Area

. . .25 1

Table of Contents / Summary Preventable / Personnel Error LERs . . . . 26 Licensee Event Report (LER) Root Cause Breakdown .

. .27 Violation Trend .

.. .. . 28 COST Cents Per Kilowatt Hour . .

. . .30 DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Maintenance Workload Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage) .. . . . .32 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance . . .33 Procedural Noncompliance incidents .

. .34 Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area .35 Radiological Work Practices Program . . . . . . . 36 Document Review . .. .. . . . . . .. .. . . . 37 Security incidents .. . .. . ... .38 Temporary Modifications . . .. . .. . 39 Outstanding Modifications . .. ... . . ... 40 Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown .

.. .41 Engineering Change Notices Status part 1 . .. . .. . .. . .42 Status part 2 . . . .. . . . . . 43 Open part 1 . . .. .. . . . . 44 Open pad 2 . . . .45 Maintenance Rule SSC Unavailability . . . . 46 Maintenance Rule SSC Reliability .

.47 Licensed Operator Requalification Training .48 License Candidate Exams . . . .49 Cycle 19 Refueling Outage MWD Planning Status . .. . . .50 Component Testing Department, Special Services Engineering Department 1998 Outage 51 Progress of 1999 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 19 . .52 Progress of Cycle 19 Outage MODS and ECte Added to 1999 Refueling Outage After Freeze 53 2

)

Table of Contents / Summary Progress of 1998 On-Line Modification Planning . . . . .54 ACTION PLANS. DEFINITIONS. SEP INDEX Action Plans . . .. .. . . . .56 Performance Indicator Definitions . . .

. 57 Safety Enhancement Program Index . . . . .. .B2 Current Production and Operations " Records"/ Station Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates . 64 3

FORT CALHOUN STATION l Monthly Summary l OPERATIONS l

l During the month of July 1998, the Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) operated at a nominal 100% power.

Normal plant maintenance, surveillance, and equipment rotation activities were performed during the month. At 17:08 on July 22,1998, it was determined that the Post-Accident Sampling System (PASS) was capable of discharging a sample of 450 degrees Fahrenheit and at 2100 psig to the " Waste Disposal System ConWnent isolation Valves", exceeding the valves temperature and pressure rating. This condition was determined to be outside the design basis of the plant. At 17:42 a one-hour Non-Emergency notification was made to the NRC pursuant to 10 CFR 50.72(B)(1)(ii)(B), "Outside Design Basis".

WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS The overall WANO Performance index was 84% during the 2nd Quarter of 1998. Significant percentage point losses are attributed to the following WANO Performance Indicators listed below:

1. The Unit Capability Factorindicator, calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 5.4 point loss as a result of unplanned energy losses defined on page 10.

2. The Unplanned Capability Loss FactorIndicatorcalculated over the previous 24 months.

contributed to a 6.5 point loss as a result of unplanned energy losses defined on pages 10 and 11.

3. The Thermal Performance Indicator, calculated over the previous 12 months, contributed to a 0.3 point loss due to thermal energy losses experienced during reactor power changes and forced outages defined on pages 10 and 16.

4. The Collective Radiation Exposure Indicator; calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 2.4 point loss, which was attributed to fuel failures and recent high exposure jobs during the refueling outage on page 19.

5. The Emergency AC Powerindicator, calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 0.6 point loss, which was a result of on-line maintenance, and replacement of relays under ECN95-347," Replace Relays for Seismic Adequacy" on page 15.

6. The Chemistry Performance inderIndicator, calculated over the previous 12 months, -

contributed to a 1.0 point loss, which is due to copper tubes in heat exchangers and mechanical shock to systems in the past year from forced outages defined on page 18.

4

C Fort Calhoun Index value t WANo Median Index value FCs GOAL 90%

91.0 --

88.9 --

86.8 -- . . . .

84.7 --

,) 8 2.6 -- {g4-g l S 80.5 -- 'I

5 78.4 -- ,

80.0) '

f 27' 9:2D gg)1 - :e , '<

76.3 -- q  ; ,

74.2 --

72.1 --

l'

<r #

4 ,

A

[ N s

e < g, 70.0  ; '

97/3 97/4 98/1 98/2 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX TREND The Wano Performance Index Trend calculation is made up of eleven variables, each value is weighted to arrive at an overall index value. WANO calculates the performance index value based on the industry reporting the information each quarter. The variables are calculated over a defined period of time as listed below.

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR WEIGHTED FACTOR TIME Unit Capability Factor 16 24 Months Unplanned Capability Loss Factor 12 24 Months High Pressure Safety injection 10 24 Months Auxiliary Feedwater 10 24 Months Emergency AC Power 10 24 Months Unplanned Auto Scrams /7000 Hours 8 24 Months Collective Radiation Exposure 8 24 Months Thermal Performance indicator 6 12 Months Secondary Chemistry Indicator 7 12 Months Industrial Safety Accident Rate 5 12 Months Fuel Reliability indicator 8 Quarterly 5

18.00 8 16.00 - g 5 A A E 3 Rs@ W 3 &coM @ 98 14.00 - U 8 o n

• ~

12.00 -

888 888 8

' ,g '

SSR SSS S$;o 8

e8a 888 8 8 8.00 - ese -

- go g go g goo 6 00 - 8 0 1 I I I I I I I I I I UCF UCLF HPSI AFW EACP CRE UA7 FRl CPI TPl ISAR WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX INDICATORS This graph shows the dfference between First Qtr '98 and Second Qtr '98 actual values achieved by Fort Calhoun.

{;ALCULATED OVER A 24 MONTH PERIOD MAXIMUM VALUE TREND UCF Unit Capability Factor 16. Decrease UCLF Unplanned Capability Loss Factor 12 Decrease HPSI High Pressure Safety injection 10 No Change AFW Auxiliary Feedwater 10 No Change EACP Er.lergency AC Power 10 No Change UA7 Unplanned Auto Scrams / 7000 Hours 8 No Change CRE Collective Radiation Exposure 8 Decrease CALCULATED OVER A 12 MONTH PERIOD TPI Thermal Performance indicator 6 No Change CPI Secondary Chemistry Indicator 7 increase ISAR Industrial Safety Accident Rate 5 No Change CALCULATED OVER A QUARTERLY PERIOD FRI Fuel Reliability indicator 8 Increase 6

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

SUMMARY

REPORT POS!?lVE TREND REPORT ADVERSE TREND REPORT A performance indcator with dats representing three consecutive A performance indicator with data representing three i months of improving performance or three consecutve months of consecutive months of dechning performanz or three consecutive performana that is supenor to the stated goal is exhibiting a positue months of performance that is trending toward declining as determined trend per Nuclear Operations Division Quakty Procedure 37 (NOD- by the Manager Nuclear Licensing. consttutes an adverse trend per QP-37). The following performance sid:cators exhbited positive Nuclear Operations Dmsion Quahty Procedure 37 (NOD-OP 37). A trends for the reporting month-supervisor whose performance indcator exhibits an adverse trend by the definition may specify in wntten form (to be pubhshed in this Unoianned Automate Reador Scrams (Page 12) report) why the trend is not adverse The following performance indicators exhibited adverse trends for the reporting month.

Hari Pressure SafeNiniection System Safety System Performance (Papa 13)

If202 Aut Feed Water System SafeN System Performance (Page 14) INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT Thermat Performance (Page 16)

A performance indicator with data for the reporting penod that is yplume o rLow-Level Radoactrve Waste (Page 21) inadequate when compared to the OPPD goal is defined as ideeding increased Management Attention *per(NOD-QP-37).

Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area (Page 35)

Clean Controlled Area Contam! nations (Page 25)

Radictooica! Work Practices Prooram (Page 36)

Temocracy Modif ications (Page 39) 7

m Significant O Noteworthy 16 - 14

, 14 - -

12 - g I

7 7 8-5 -

5 1 1 0 0 0 , , , , , ,

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 INPO NOTEWORTHY / SIGNIFICANT EVENTS Noteworthy /Significant events at FCS are classified by INPO to identify precursors to events.

There was 1 Noteworthy and 0 Significant Events during the month ofJuly 1998.

Significant Events for July 1998:

. None Noteworthy Events since Start of INPO Cycle:

Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Overspeed and Overpressurization of System Piping Containment Hydrogen Panel Components Exceed Qualified Life Due to incorrect Calculation Assumptions Transformer Fault and Loss of Off-Site Power While Shutdown Due to inadvertent Actuation of Transformer Deluge System Degraded Steam Generator Tube Left in Service Due to Personnel Error Reactor Coolant Pump Cavitation During Planned Pressure Reduction Data Source: Tills /Guinn (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Tills /Guinn Trend: None 8

WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 9

Monthly Unit Capability Factor --o-- 24 Month Unit Capability Factor 120.0% . $

8 y 8 8 8

$$, * $$$$$g g C

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 o N 100.0 %

(L E 1 g E E (g C E E EE E _ ,,

g k 800%

g .

j d

1998 RFo 20.0 % yg g g 0.0%

8 8 8 8 8 3 5 ea3 5 5 3 ea3 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 hhbhbkbhkhkb$$bhhkb5$hkb UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR UCF is defined as the ratio of the available energy generation over a given period of time to the reference energy generation over the same time period, expressed as a percentage. The FCS Goal for the indicator is (87.5%) and the WANO Median is (81.9%).

-UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR AVERAGES t Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 65.3% 84.0% 75.1 % 80.2% ____

Enerav Losses:

Forced Outage-Condenser circulating valve repairs and leakage on Condenser "B" Event Period: September 10, thru13,1997.

Power Reduction- Faculty Manual Transfer switch on instrument inverter "A" Event Period: August 26,28,1997.

Forced Outage- Circumferential cracking of a weld down stream of a moisture separator due to high system stresses Event Period: May 28, thru May 29,1997.

Forced Outage- Steam leak in the fourth stage extraction steam system Event Period: April through mid May 1997.

A 24 month calculation of the WANO UCF indicataor was 10.6 points out of 16 points. At the end of the Sacond Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 10.6 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 13.6.

Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability:' Solymossy Trend: None 10

24 " "

Yor"Yah'o"uS'o"o"aY<3 / 5f8""" ' " "*" ' C vv A 0 du ry"b da (2.2 % )

60.00% -

s l g-50.00 % - s g

40.00 % - d f 30.00 % - $

~

s ss as./ ._. C!s!r !s e is iso is W!

10.00% - e r o_ N -6 -6 ~'e

". .T M,.D

=

I 0.00% ,

4 8 4 4 4 2 2 42 5 2 4 T T . . ...

4 4 4 4 8 8 5 4 4 5N5EE$bE$$kA 5$8EE$${4kl$4 i I

UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Unplanned Capability Loss Factor (UCLF), a rolling 12-month average, the OPPD goal, and the WANO Industry Median. UCLF is defined as the ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a given period of time, to the reference energy generation expressed as a percentage. Unplanned energy loss is defined as energy not produced as a result of unscheduled shutdowns, outage extensions, or load reductions due to causes under plant management control. Energy losses are considered to be unplanned if they are not scheduled at least four weeks in advance.

1 I

l IUNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR AVERAGES l Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 6.60% 5.07 % 8.17% 7.7%

A 24 month calculation of the WANO UCLF indicataor was 5.50 points out of 16 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.50 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 5.60.

I Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report I Accountability:

Trend:

Solymossy None 11

--e-- 12-Month Rolling Avsrags

--+-- FCS Reactor Scrams Per 7,000 Hours Critical forlast 36 months Fort Calhoun Goal (0.0)

-e-- WANO Industry Median (0)

FCS Reactor Scrams - 1997-98 f 2-l 1--

1998 O:  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :  :

Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7000 HOURS CRITICAL The graph shows the 12-month rolling average, the 36-month average, the OPPD goal for 1998 and the WANO Industry Median. Also the graph shows the number of Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams that occurred during the last 12 months. There were no Unplanned Automatic Reactos du ring the month of July 1998. The 12-month rolling average (August 1997 through July 1998) was 0. An unplanned automatic reactor SCRAM occurred in August 1995; therefore, the 36-month value (August through July 1998) was 0.293.

A 24 month calculation of the WANO UA7 indicataor was 8.0 points out of 8 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 8.0 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 8.0.

Data Source: Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Solymossy Trend: Positive 12

i i Monthly HPSI System Unavailability Value

-A- 12 Month Rolling Average Fort Calhoun Goal (0.003)

-e- WANO Industry Median (0.002) 0.02 --

0.015 --

0.01 --

0.005 -- 1998 RFO 0 1 :  :  : i :  :  : i l 1 l 1 : 1 l 1 l 1 l l Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the High Pressure Safety injection (HPSI) System unavailability value, asdefined by WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, forJuly 1998.

The HPSI System unavailability value for the month of July 1998 was 0.0. There were 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of planned unavailability, and 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of unplanned unavailability. The 12 month rolling average was (August 1997 through July 1998) was 0.00, and the year-to-date HPSI unavailability value was 0.00 at the end of the month. For the previous year there was a total of 9.8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> of planned unavailability and 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of unplanned unavailability for the HPSI system.

A 24 month calculation of the WANO HPSI indicataor was 10.0 points out of 10 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 10.0 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 10.0 Data Source: Phelps/Schaffer (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Schaffer Trend: Positive 13

l j

--o-12 Month AFW Unavailability Fort Calhoun Goal (0.01)

---

WANO Industry Median (0.001) 0.015 -

0.013 --

0.011 -

0.009 -- 0.009 0.007 --

0.005 0.005

,- m, n 0i# 3 --

• M 0,002 0.002 0.002

'n""\g a" 0.001 -- -- - -- -- -- ---&---4--- --- -

g 4.001 "

Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) System Unavailability value, as defined ty WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the month of July 1998.

The AFW System Unavailability Value for July 1998 was 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />. There were 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of planned and 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of Unplanned Train Unavailability hours during the month. The 12 month rolling average ( August 1997 through July 1998) was 0.0027 and the year-to-date unavailability value was 0.0010 at the end of July 1998.

A 24 month calculation of the WANO AFW indicator was 10.0 points out of 10 points. At the end of the Sacond Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 10.0 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 10.0.

Data Source: Fhelps/Fritts (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Fritts Trend: None 14

m Monthly Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value

-m- Year-to-Date Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value Fort Calhoun Goal (0.024)

--*-- WANO Industry Median (0.005) 0.07 - g 0.06 - o 0.05 -

0.04 -

, g 0.03 - y y y o 0.02 -

0.01 - m E g g g w,, ,

0 , , M," " ,

~

~.~,~.~,

8 5 S E T e U g g ,E a 2 $ s& ,E 4 < m o z E

8 EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Emergency AC Power System unavailability value, as defined by WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the month of July 1998.The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value forJuly 1998 was 0.05S. The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value year-to-date was 0.016 and the value for the last 12 months (August 1997 through July 1998) was 0.015.

Monthiv Statistics Planned Unavailabilltv: DG-1: 79.9 DG-2: 7.1 Total: 87.0 YTD: 112.0 Hours Unnlanned Unavailable:tv: DG-1: 0.0 DG-2: 0.0 Total: 0.0 YTD: 00.0 Hours A 24 month calculation of the WANO EACP indicator was 9.4 points out of 10 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 9.4 which cornpares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 9.4.

i Data Source: Phelps/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Ronning Trend: None 14 l

m Monthly Thermal Performance i

i 12-Month Rolling Average Fort Calhoun Goal (99.7%)

--dr WANO Industry Median (99.1%)

l s 8 8 1998 8 8

[ $ $ 8 = m o 8 wo 8 $

'"" ~ E I- i ErEr$rirEr - -

I- b 99% --

II I I I I I I I I 98 %  :  :  :

l l l l l  :

Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July THERMAL PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the monthly Thermal Performance Value, the rolling 12-month average, the OPPD goal, and the WANO Industry Median.

The thermal performance value for the month of July was 100.0%. The year to date value was reported as 99.9%. The 12 month rolling average (August 1997 through July 1998) was reported as 99.9%.

Note: Our Best Achievable Gross Heat Rate improved by 4% this month (it is now 63 BTU /kwh better than design.), Primarily this is attributable to the new High Pressure Turbine diaphragms that were installed during the 1998 refueling outage.

The 1998 Fort Calhoun year-end goal for this indicator is an index value which is > 99.7%. The 12 month calculation of the WANO TPI indicator 99.1%.

The 12 month calculation of the WANO TPI indicator was 5.7 points out of 6 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.7 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 5.7.

Data Source: Phelps/Naser(Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Naser Trend: Positive 16

l Fuel Reliability (E-04 Microcuries/ Gram)

[ A End of 1998 Goal (17.3 E-04 Microcuries/ Gram)

--o-- WANO Industry Median (0.21E-04 Microcuries/ Gram)  !

l E 100 -

10 - A c 1.8 1-u 3 0.1 -

m 0.01 i 0.01 i i i i i i l Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The monthly Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) for July 1998 was 0.01 E-04 microcuries/ gram was based on steady state data at 100% power. The purpose of the FRl is to monitor industry progress in achieving and maintaining a high level of fuel integrity. An effective fuel integrity ard performance monitoring program provides a means to detect fuel failures and assess the fuel fcilure number, physical condition, expos' ' mechanism, and location.

Coolant activity data through July 31,1998 does not show the presence of any defective fuel rods.

lodine activity leveh are higher than expected for a clean core. This is due to operating with fuel failures for the past 2.5 cycles which contributed to the large amount of tramp (lodine-134) and lodine-131 currently present in Cycle 18. The current lodine-134 activity indicates that 70 percent of the tramp material in the active core region was removed during the spring 1998 refueling outage. Xenon-133 is about 1.5 decades lower than in Cycle 17, another indication of a defect-free core.

The Quarterly calculation of the WANO FRI indicator was 8.0 points out of 8 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 8.0 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 0.0.

i Drta Source: Guinn/Roenigk (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Stafford Trend: None 17

w "f.onthly Chemi:try Indicator 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (1.1)  !

-*-- WANO Industry Median (1,04) 3 --

2A3 2.5 -- -

O 2-- #j W

1.5 - 1.32 9h 1.36 1.29 1.05 1 11 1.1 1.04 h

i - ) e yy

.7

& N I

i$ #;

E y$ 3 n

g E

4 h

L

(

1998 0.5 -- n  ; d. k d. N .

h RFO k

$ @ k f$ $ h h h N h 0  :  :  :  :  : ':  ; i  :

Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY i Staady state plant conditons required for calculating the Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) for plant performance follo. wing Refueling Outage that ended on June 3.

The CPI for July 1998 is 1.29, this was higher than normal for steady state operations due to higher than cxpected sodium and anion numbers. This condition is currently under investigation. Reference memo FC-C-091-98. The CPI value for the past 12 months (August 1997 through July 1998) was 1.076. The CPI value in the industry's upper quartile is 1.17. Six parameters are used in the CPI calculation. Four of tre parameters were below the WANO mean value which are as follows: 1) steam generator chloride, 2) sulfate, 3)feedwater iron, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen. Increase in CPI observed this month due to power ascention from refueling outage. This is an expected condition.

The 12 month calculation of the WANO CPI Indicator was 7.0 points out of 7 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 7.0 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 5.60 D ta Source: Hamilton /Ostien (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Hamilton Trend: None 18 I

t --- -------_ -

M CRE Pe r sonne l Based on TLD QTRS m WhdRadtnEgnue(ED)

FCS Goa1224 REM - MEgmMmEDW N

CO

" 2D-225 2D .

200- N;;

3gg h 175 - g a 150- 3m-125 - tD .

100 - 110-  ;;;

k

. 70 e, $

25 - S 5"M V" 3 35 M "

0 i i -- -i i hO -'"' $$

~ - '

1 2 3 4 an re ur 5 W an .u Ag Sp CH Ny Oc COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE The 1998 goal for Collective Radiation Exposure (CRE) at Fort Calhoun Station was established for a Total Dose of 224.0 person-rem, based on TLD readings. Dose is tracked monthly by obtaining Electronic Dosimeter (ED) readings, until the Quarterly TLD readings are obtained. The exposure for July 1998 was 2.881 Person-rem (ED). The WANO Industry Median is 127 man-REM per year based on a three year average compared to 139 man-REM per year at FCS.

Dose FCS Goal Person- First Qtr. Second Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr.

Rem Otr.

Total 224.0 15.560 193.822 Person-Rem Tha 24 month calculation of the WANO CRE Indicator was 4.6 points out of 8 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 4.6 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 7.0

)

Data Source: Solymossy/ Williams (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Solymossy/Gebers Trend: None SEP54 l

19 l

l t _ . _ _ . _ - - _ . _

tllllllll3 Monthly indu trial safaty Accid:nt & Diasbling injurylllinsss Rete

-*-- 12 Month Rolling Average FCS Year-End Goal (<0.40)

--e- Ye ar 2000 WANo Industry Goal (<0.40) 1-0.9 -

0.8 -

0.7 -

l y j 0.6 - T 0.5 - S O 9 M 0.4 -

0.3 -

= = = = = = k h $

~

= Y

< J -

0.2 - h h k b 7 0.1 -

T) 7  % is, O . , , T , S , $ 9, b 9 ,I, Aug Sep Oct Nov. Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT AND-DISABLING INJURY /lLI + ESS (LOST-TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in improving industrial safety performance for ,

utility personnel permanently assigned to the station. Contractor work-hours are not included in the indicator. This indicator is defined asthe number of accidents per 200,000 work-hours worked ]

for all utility personnel permanently assigned to the station that result in any of following:

one or more days of restricted work (excluding the day of the accident.)

one or more days away from work (excluding the day of the accident.)

+

fatalities.

ISAR = (number of restricted-time accidents + lost-time accidents + fatalities) x 200.000 (number of station person-hours worked)

Th3 Fort Calhoun Station Industrial Safety Accident Rete and Disabling injury /lliness Frequency Rtte was 0.26 for the month of July 1998. The 12 month rolling average (August 1997 through

' July 1998) was 0. The year to date value was 1 at the end of July 1998. There was no restricted-time and no lost-time accident in July 1998.

The 12 month calculation of the WANO ISAR Indicatoris 5.0 points out of 5 points. At the end of tha Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.0 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value t

of5.0.

Drta Source: Sorensen/Schneider(Manager / Source)

Solymossy/ Booth (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Gebers Trend: None SEP 25,26 & 27 20 L--________

m Monthly Volume of LLRW(cu. meter)

Year-to-Date Cumulative Radioactive Waste Buried

--WANO Industry Median (54 cu. meter) 70 -

I 60 -

A  :  :  :  :  :  :  :

50 -

7 Y

$ 40 -

Yi a 4

$ 30 - )

l 20 -

l 10 - E 5 88 4 E R gW " '

d d_ 5' 8' y g' N g 0 , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec i

VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE This indicator shows the volume of the monthly Radioactive Waste buried and the cumulative y ar-io-date radioactive waste buried. The Fort Calhoun goal is 800 cu.ft.

Ft m8 Amount of solid radwaste shipped off-site for processing during current month : 000.0 0.00 Volume of solid radweste buried during July 1998 : 1.2 .03 Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste buried in 1998 : 255.8 7.24 Amount of solid radwaste in temporary storage : 000.0 00.00 The WANO industry Median is 54 cubicmeters per year. The industry Best Quartile value is approximately 26 cubic meters per year.

D:ta Source: Solymossy/Breuer (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Gebers l  : Trend: Positive SEP 54 l

21 r

e-_-__________.

SAFE OPERATIONS l

Goal: A proactive, self-critical and safety conscious culture is exhibited throughout the nuclear organization. Individuals demonstrate professionalism through self-ownership and personal initiative and open communication.

l I

l l

l 22

muu Error Rate -;-FCS Goal -m--Rolling Error Rate f 10 -

9- 8.81 8.51 0 8

g. 7} 6.67 6.42 S 6-u 5- 4.39

& 4- 3.48 3.47 3.65 e 2.78 2.80 3- 2.19.

f g 2- 1.06 1 91

, , ,w. _l y , ,

6 1.05 u; o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

///////////////

///////////////

Personnel Error Rate The purpose of this indicator is to monitor human error events at FCS which are classified as a Noteworthy Event," under the criteria specified in the Condition Rcport Program. Noteworthy events may be classified s level one, two, or three on a Condition Report or as defined but not limited to the examples listed below:

Error Rate = number of human errors x hours everv two weeks 100,000 hrs

1. A recordable injury in industrial safety.

2. Valve Mispositioning event caused by plant personnel.

3. Equipment tagging error that significantly impacts safe operation of the plant, readiness or personal safety.

4. Improper use of or failure to use of safety equipment or performing a task in an unsafe manner.

5. Any event involving loss of radioactive material control that may cause or potentially result in an individual receiving an unauthorized exposure.

6. Any spill or spread of radioactive material, which results in an impact on the plant or the general safety of plant personnel or the general public.

7. Failure to utilize, or adhere to sound radiation principles, or accepted administrative controls to keep occupational radiation exposure, or exposures to member of public ALARA.

8. Chemistry parameter (s) out of specification, involving insufficient chemistry corrective action or oversight.

9. Violation of procedure or human performance error.

10. Less than 3 deep (qualified members)in minimum staffing position for the Control Room, TSC, OSC, and EOF.-

11. Any unplanned impact to offsite evacuation routes or reheation capability.

12. Any failure or theft of emergency response equipment o, supplies necessary to complete classification, notification, protective action recommendation or ERO command & control functions.

13. Inadequate training or qualification.

14. Failure to adequately staff the ERO in actual responses or drill notification.

Dita Source: Tesar/Burggraf (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Tesar Tr:nd: None 23

i Monthly Recordable injuryllliness Rate 1998 F.C.S. Goal (1.5) 2-1.6 -

1.2 -

0.8 - 0.63

- 0.53 0.43 0.4 - - 0.33 0.3 @

D ~

. ;p 0 0 4, bg g T 0 , ,

Jan Fe b Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE This indicator shows the monthly Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate. A recordable injury / illness case is reported if personnel from any of the Nuclear Divisions are injured on the job cnd require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid.

The recordable injury / illness case numbers for the month of July 1998 was one. A maintenance worker contracted a foreign object to the right eye and received medication. The 1998 Fort Calhoun Station year-to-date goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 1.5.

i l

l l

D:.ta Source: Sore nsen/S chneider(M a na ger/S ou rce)

Accountability: Gebers

[ Trend: None SEP 15,25,26 & 27 L

24

O Contamination Events (Monthly)

O Contamination Events (YTD) 90 90 - -

80 L 80 - --

's 70 k }

70 - E i s  !(h 60 - ,, [ {

F >: $

50 - g 4#- i 40 - 38[e 4 y(

32 .

30 - N' 1 23  ; m, h y 20 - 15 4 j

10 - S8 yA 8* '

g .

y g.

{ y Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep oct Nov Dec l l

CLEAN CONTROLLED AREA CONTAMINATIONS >1,000 DISINTEGRATIONS / MINUTE PER PROBE AREA This indicator shows the Personnel Contamination Events in the Clean Controlled Area for contaminations >1,000 disintegrations / minute per probe area for July 1998.

There were 10 personnel contamination events in July 1998. The total year-to-date of Personnel events is 90 at the end of July 1998. This indicator has been classified as "Naeding increased Management Attention," due to an upward trend of Year to date contamination events over the past three months.

Data Source: Solymossy/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability.: Solymossy/Gebers Trend: Needing increased Management Attention SEP 15 & 54 25

35

-.+--Total Events 18 Month Totals 30

--o- Preventable -0 0

--*--Personel Error 20 N

15 -

10 N _ .

5 A _2#' -

i O

Jark Fets Mar. Apr. May. Jun- Jul-97 Aug- Sep. Oct- Nov- Dec. Jark Feb- Mar- Apr. May- Jun-97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 98 PREVENTABLE / PERSONNEL ERROR LERs This indicator depicts 18-month totals for numbers of " Preventable" and " Personnel Error" LERs.

The graph shows the 18-month totals for preventable LERs, the 18-month totals for Personnel Error LERs, and the Personnel Error totals for each month. The LERs are trended based on the LER event date as opposed to the LER report date.

In June 1998, there were three (3) events which were subsequently reported as an LER. One LER was categorized as " Preventable" and One LER was categorized as " Personnel Error" during the month of June. The total LERs for the year 1998 are six. The total Personnel Error LERs for the year 1998 are two.

The year-to-date goal for this indicator is that the year-end values forthe 18-month totals not to exceed 5 Preventable and 2 Personnel Error LERs.

NOTE: Due to the way LERs are tracked & reported, this indicator lags by one-month.

Data Source: Tills /Matzke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy Trend: None SEP 15 26

Adnin Mise g

9%

. 'f; ygt I?

kh., &%, Lo Err.

hSs 13 %

Design 43 % 4

• Other Err.

13%

^

b Maint.

9%

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the LERs by event date broken down by Root Cause Code for each of the past eighteen months from January 1997, through June 30,1998. To be consistent with the Preventable / Personnel Error LERs indicator, this indicator is reported by the LER event date, as opposed to the LER report date.

The cause codes are intended to identify possible programmatic deficiencies. For detailed descriptions of these codes, see the " Performance Indicator Definitions" section of this report.

NOTE: Due to the way LERs are tracked & reported, this indicator is one-rmnth behind.There were three events in June 1998 that resulted in an LER. There were no missed surveillance tests resulting in LERs during June 1998. The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goal for this indicator is 0.

Data Source: Tills /Matzke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 27

9667 GHBK GU SALP 12 Month M FCSCitedVioladons(Monthly) y m FCS Non-Chad Violations (Monthly) 2 0 3 g S '"

E E 2 ) E E

E E

a o

g , 7 _

E " , E E s 3 E E B s e E E E 4 IMm ii - I lid j! Aug sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July j .3 3S VIOLATION TREND This indicator depicts twelve months of violationdata for Fort Calhoun Station. Illustrated monthly cra Cited Violations and Non-Cited Violations. The current SALP cycle began on August 3,1997 cnd ends on January 30,1999.

The following inspection reports noting violations were issued during July 1998:

Violation Level IER No. Title IV (1) 98-11 Special inspection TIA-3 Fault NCV (1) 98-10 Resident Monthly IV (1) 98-16 Solid Radiactive Waste and Transportation To date, OPPD has received forty violations for inspection reports issued in the current SALP cycle. Two (2) Level IV violations received in August 1997, and three (3) Level IV violatiors received in October 1997, were carried over from the previous SALP cycle due to a lag in the reporting process.

Level Ill Violations 1 Level IV Violations 21 Non-Cited Violations _1B_

Total 40 The 1998 Fort Calhoun Station Goal for this performance indicator is to be at or below the cited violation trend for the top quartile plants in Region IV.

Data Source: Tills /Cavanaugh (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Tills Trend: None 28

s COST Goal: Operate Fort Calhoun Station in a manner that cost effectively maintains nuclear generation as an economically viable contribution to OPPD's bottom line. Cost consciousness is exhibited at all levels of the organization.

l 29

12 Month Rolling Average

Actual --m- Budget --o-- Plan 4.00 s.s0 -

l 3.00

, = = -.

~

2.s0 -

b_.

2.00 1.s0 1.00 ' '

444448 8 4444 444444EI5E EEEEEN$EkEAE5R8EE CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR June 1998 The purpose of this indicator is to quantify the economical operation of Fort Calhoun Station. The Cents Per Kilowatt Hour indicator represents the budget and actual cents per kilowatt hour on a 12-month rolling average for the current year.

The basis for the budget curve is the approved 1998 revised budget. The basis for the actual curve is the Financial and Operating Report.

The December 31 amounts are also shown for the prior years 1993 through 1997. In addition, the report shows the plan amounts for the years 1999 through 2002 for reference. The basis for the dollars are the Nuclear Long Range Financial Plan and the 1998 Corporate Planning and Budget Review. The basis for the generation is provided by Nuclear Fuels.

Tha 12 month rolling average unit price period of ( July 1997 through June 1998) averaged above budget due to tha extended refueling outage and less generation during the period. The 12 month rolling average is 3.24 cents per kilowatt hour.

Th3 year-to-date average is trending in a positive direction.

Cents ner KWH Jan Feb Mar Anr May Jun Jul Aun San Oct Nov Dec Cudget Y-T-D 3.02 2.85 3.27 4.13 3.81 3.53 3.36 3.19 3.09 3.04 2.97 2.92 Actual Y-T-D 2.96 2.85 3.00 3.26 4.16 4.39 NO'E: This information normally lags by a month due to the short turn around required for processing.

D:ta Source: Tesar/ Huang (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Belek/ Huang Tr:nd: Needing incresed Management Attention 30

DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Goal: Achieve high standards at Fort Calhoun Station resulting in safe, reliable and cost effective power production.

31

m Corrective Maintenance m Preventive Maintenance i

i Non-Corrective /Plantimprovements Fort Calhoun Goal (200) i 1000 --

808 773 723 800~~636 644 656 692 696 600 -- l 400 --

200 --

0 l l l l l  :  ;  ;  ; l l Aug sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Non-Outage Maintenance Work Document Backlog B Tota lMWDs PERCENT OF MWD'S PAST GOAL BY PRIORITY MWD PR1oR1TY Priority 2 601 Priority 1 3%

600 - 0%

00 -

400 - Priority 3 g

300 -

97 200 119 Priority 4 100 -

0 j 23 i" l 8 I g I 75%

Pnority Prionty Prionty Priority Pnonty 1 2 3 4 5 MAINTENANCE WORKLOAD BACKLOG This indicator shows the backlog of non-outage Maintenance Work Documents remaining open at the end of the reporting month,a breakdown by maintenance classification and priority. The 1998 goal for this indicator is 200 non-outage corrective maintenance MWDs. The current backlog of corrective MWDs is168 to ensure that the MWD backlog is worked in a timely manner, non-l outage maintenance completion goals have been established as follows:

l GDAl Priority 1 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Priority 2 7 days Priority 3 30 days Priority 4 90 days Priority 5 As resources permit Data Source: Solymossy/ Johnson (Manager / Source) ,

Accountability: Solymossy/Clemens Trend: None SEP 36 32

( Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance 100 %

74 % 77Y 76 %

7 74 75%

80 % 74 % 75 % 74 %

72 %

l 5 f a f N' 7 7 59 % 59 % T 80 % '

1 Af  % f 5@ T' T g h) 40% 4 jh Jj I E k 20% - k , ., ..? m, .

0% ' '

Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Preventive Maintenance items Overdue Fort Calhoun Goal 2%

7% --

6% -- 5.50 % 6.02%

4.01 %

3.05 3.03 %

3% - 2.50 % 2.40% 2.60 %

2% -- - -----------------

> l l I I I I I i i i i Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The top graph shows the ratio of completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance. -The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was72% for the month of July 1998.

The lower graph shows the percentage of scheduled preventive maintenance items that ware not completed by the late finish date. From the period of (June 15th thru July 15th) there were 13PMk that were completed late or not completed out of 491 scheduled. The 1598 Fort Calhoun monthly goal for the percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue is a maximum of 2%.

I Data Source: Solymossy/ Johnson (Manager / Source)  !

Accountability: Solymossy/Clemens Trend: None SEP 41 & 44 33

l 20 --

Human Performance CRs (Maintenance) 18 --

16 16 --

g 14 --

I "

-[ 12 -- 11 k

y 10 --

0 o

I 8--

6--

4-- 3 2 2 2-- 1 1 1 0 l l l l  : "l l l l  : " l Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July I PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS I (MAINTENANCE)

I This indicator shows the number of Condition Reports related to procedural noncompliance incidents assigned to the Maintenance Department.

I Data Source: Clemens/Burggraf (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Chase /Clemens Trend: None SEP 15,41 & 44 I 34

333 Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (5%)

I 6% --

I 5% - 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8%

4.8%

4% -.-

3% --

2% --

l 1% --

1 0% -

1 I i  ! I I I I I

I Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec CONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA 1  ;

l This indicator shows the percentage of the Radiologically Controlled Area (RCA) that is '

l contaminated based on the total square footage of 70475. At the end of July 1998, the total contaminated area was 3383 square feet which is 4.8 percent of the RCA . The monthly FCS goal for 1998 is a Maximum of 5% Contaminated Area.

l Data Source: Chase / Williams (Manager / Source)  !

' l Accountability: Chase /Gebers Trend: Positive SEP 54

{

I I 35

m Monthly Poor Radiation Worker Practices l m Total PRWP for 1998 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (<20) 25 -

18 15 14 11 10 5' 33 3 3 2

0 t i i i i i i i f i i - 1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug sep oct Nov Dec RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor Radiological Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reporting month.

The number of PRWPs which are identified each month should indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance. This indicator needs increased management attention due to a 3 month increasing trend of poor radiation worker practices based on YTD.

During the month of July there was 2 PRWP identified.

There have been a total of 18 Poor Radiation Worker Practices in 1998.

The 1998 FCS goalis <20 PRWPs, the 1997 goal was <15 PRWPs.

Data Source: Solymossy/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Solymossy/Gebers Trend: Needing Increased Management Attention SEP52 36

E Documents Scheduled for Review a Document Reviews complete during month O Documents Overdue 300 --

250 --

200 --

+ + + 1 I Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Fe b Mar Apr May June July 19S7-1998 DOCUMENT REVIEW The Document Review indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month.The documents reviews are performed in-house and include Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual.

During July 1998, there were 122 document reviews scheduled, while 85 reviews were completed.

At the end of the month, there were 26 document reviews more than 6 months overdue. There were O new documents initiated during July 1998.

Data Source: Ponec/Plath (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Ponec Trend: None SEP 46 37

35 30 -- ---------

25 --

A 20 - . ,

/ \

15 -- - -

,,N .

10 -- -

5-- - -

0 , , , , , , , F- - i - r --- - i - - - r- '

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG sEP ocT NoV DEC 98 Loggables 98 Non-Loggables 97 Loggables - -+ - 97 Non-Loggables SECURITY INCIDENTS The Loggable and Non-Loggable Incident (Security) Indicators are depicted in the chart above.

The chart depicts the total number of loggable and non-loggable human error events and system failures which occurred during the reporting month.

During the month of July 1998, there were 11 loggable incidents and 12 non-loggable incidents identified (excluding access denials). Of allincidents identifed this month six (6) were human error events. Of loggable events, two (2) were human performance errors and nine (9) were system failures, six (6) of those being caused by the environment. There was one (1) internal human performance error in July. There was one (1) loggable access denial and two (2) non-loggable access denials during the reporting period. Human pedormance continues to be an organizational focus.

This indicator provides information on security performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item No. 58.

Data Source: Sefick/ Clark (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sefick Trend: None SEP 58 38

I m Temporary Modifications >1-fuel cycle old (RFO required for renuval) l m Temporary Modifications >6 months old (Renovable on-line)

- Fort Calhoun Goals for both Terrporary Modifications' estegories 3.5 -

3 3-2.5 -

2 2 2 2 2 ?2 2 2 2 2 2 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July I TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS This indicator provides information on the number of Temporary Modifications (TMs) greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage (RFO) for removal and the number of TMs removable on-line that are greater than six months old. The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goals for both of the TM categories are zero. l At the end of July 1998, there were no TMs that were greater than one-fuel cycle old requiring an outage for removal.

At the end of July 1998, there were two (2) TMs installed that were greater than six months old that could be removed on-line. TM 96-039, Railroad Siding / Corridor 26 Door, was installed November 1,1996. EAR 97-219 will be used to remove this TM by January 1,1999. TM 97-022, LPSI Header Pressure Gauge at PT-325, was installed December 12, 1997. ECN 98-161 will be used to remove this TM by January 1,1999.

At the end of July 1998, there was a total of ten (10) TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun Station. Two (2) of the ten (10) installed TMs require an RFO for removal and eight (8) are removable on-line. In 1998, a total of fifteen (15) TMs have I been installed. At the end of July 1998, there were three (3) procedural or maintenance configuration alterations (PMCAs)(a special classification of TM)instiled in the Fort Calhoun Station using PRC approved procedures which are controlled by Standing Order 0-25.

I Data Source: Phelps/ Turner (Manager / Source) l I Accountability:

Trend:

Phelps/ Core Needing increased Management Attention SEP 62&71 I

I I

I 39

i i Total Modification Packages Open 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (68) 69 -

67 - 65 65 - -

63 - 62 61 61 - -

59 - s 57 -

55 , , , , , , , ,

May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS This indicator shows the total number of Outstanding Modifications (excluding outstanding modifications which are orooosed to be cancelled).

Reporting Cateaorv '90 '94 E E E 'QR

_ QQ Month Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 Mod. Requests Being Reviewed 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 Design Engr. Backlog /In Progress 0 0 0 0 3 20 23 Construction Backlog /In Progress 1 0 3 4 17 1 26 Design Engr. Update Backlog /In Progress _1 4 _2 1 _Q __g _j2 Totals 6 4 5 5 20 25 65 (Outage + OnLine) (2+4) (2+2) (5+0) (1+4) (16+4) (18+7)

The 1998 year-end Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a maximum of 68 outstanding modifications.

D ta Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski Trond: None 10

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ - _ - - - _ _ - - _ - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- ~

60 -

E ARs Requiring Engineering Closecut. Not in Closeout M SE N DEN 40 -

37 30 --

20 21 20 17 0-- 1 I  ; I- I t i I i I I a May June July May June July May June July May June July 0 3 Months 3 6 Monthe 6-12 M on ths > 12 M o n th s O Engineering Response 5 Closeout (SE) 40 -- 31

1. ~

13 h:_6 30 '

l 9 9 l

6 3 8 o 3 1 0 0 l l l Priority 0 Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Priority 6 Closeeut 44 EAR's 60 Schedule Repone Respo 164 Cloaeout 13.3%

ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of EARS assigned to Design Engineering and System Engineering. The 1998 year-end goal for this indicator is a maximum of 120 outstanding EARS.

Th3 Total EAR breakdown is as follows:

EARS opened during the month 7 EARS closed during the month 18 Total EARS open at the end of the month 120 Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 62 41

87 M 366 68 CLOSEOUT CEN >6 0-3 19% 20 % Months '"

7,), 40 78.1 % 3-6 C 17 .

\

ECN STATUS-OVERALL BACKLOG B Backlogged O Received a Completed ,}

3 '3 3,

150 -- Months Months 92 86 H 100 1M M 14%

51 g 3 4

ivu Mar Apr May June July DESIGN ENGINEERING B Backlogged E Received C Completed 6

34 Months M 8.6%

90 ~# 70 69 70 70 - ."/. 68

>6 Months 50 --

79.1 %

I 12 11 11 9 6

' Feb Mar Apr May June July SYSTEM ENGINEERING ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Phelps Trend: None SEP 62 42

E Bdtupd u Ramed 3 Carrped g

~

3..N 242 242 03 3-8 nt s M onths 2B >6 onths .

2D 89.9% 6.8 %

1G) -

8 11 j j

6 V4y. g g ggyg g_ W.,

5 9 8 I

4 5 0 4 E a F4 k Ar May .km .h@

PROCUREMENT / CONSTRUCTION 3 Beispd 0 Rnwed D Ctnpisted q, 100 - g 3,,

37 72 o-3 '7 80 Months ,

7 60 - e to Months

, . 7, l.

Feb Mar Apr May June July DRAFTING / CLOSEOvT ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Phelps Trend: None SEP 62 43

i 85 89 95 Pnority 110 DC TYPE F C TYPE S&6 Priority 18.9% 20.2 % 17 % 1&2 5 /c 0'/

Tota! Open ECNs = 465 T o t b l O p'e n E C N s = 4 65 O DEN-ClosecutorDrafbngNotComplete O MantenanceConstrucbon/Procurernent WxkNotCornplete O System Engineenng Response, Confirmation Not Complete 9 U 182/

O DEN-EngreeringNotComplete RiaitySSE 210 %  ;

120.. 94% i 12 16 23 28 37 60 - 39 32 27 17 3 .

Ricit/384 40 -- 4 1 1 1 4 3

W/o 20 - 41 43 44 43 33 43 0 1 1 l l l [

Feb Mar Apr May June July FecWty Change ECNs Open ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICES OPEN Data Bource: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 62 44

I N h horn ECNs Open E EEJEi'@#D 78 281 R1 ty 1&2 174 250 - 4 5 22 y Pn ty 20I 210 215 299 50 -

0 bb-98 28 34 14 Mar-98 25 26 Apr-98 27 27 May-98 28 gg, Jun 98 29 27 Jtd.98 26 gg Open 4

0 CEN-Cbeaxt -

s*LTmg-m%  %

5 86 TcWDC EDs Open 4.5%

41.8'/.

100 83 30 89 86 78 M 2 A8 20 9k ' ~ Priority Feb Mar May Jure July 3&4 53.9 %

ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICES OPEN g

SEP 62 45

l l

l MAINTENANCE RULE UNAVAILABILITY PERFORMANCE l l

, ,J #ssCs Exceeding Unavailability Cnteria # ssCs Monitored -e- % Exceeding Unavailabihty Criteria 70 ---- 14.0%

~ ~

, 60 -- -- 12.0%

' N 50 -- -. -

- 10.0%

. ~

..e , . o" g 40 -- ,

I ,

--8.0%

$ . 30

. g  ; --6.0%

m , e '

E 20 - 4 ;g -4.0%

10 __ N l; , . h hg -- 2.0%

0 E  :

l l- 0.0%

3-96 4-96 1-97 2-97 3-97 4-97 1-98 2-98 QTR Maintenance Rule SSC Unavailability This indicator shows the quarterly Maintenance Ruis Unavailability Performance value which is based on the performance of SSG which have specific Availability Performance Criteria.

A single SSC, inverter Bypass Transformer #1, EE-4S, continues to exceed its Unavailability Performance Criteria. The performance trend for this SSC is improving.

l l

i D:ta Source Phelps/Swearngin/ Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps Trend: None f

46 i

l l

l L__ _ _ _ _

MAINTENANCE RULE SSC RELIABILITY PERFORMANCE m Total Failures (c, D, F) C--ll Maintenance Preventable Failures -*- Fbreent Maintenance Preventable 1

140 70.0 %

]

120 -- -- 60.0%

100 - -- 50.0%

80 --

3  ; -- 40.0%

a g 60 -

-- 30.0%

40 . --  % '

-- 20.0%

D 1 g

20 --

f -- 10.0%

0  :

U'  :  : .

i-- 0.0%

3-96 4-96 1-97 2-97 3-97 4-97 1-98 2-98 QTR Maintenance Rule SSC Reliability This indicator shows the quarterly Maintenance Rule Reliabilty Performance value which is b: sed on tracking being compiled based on component failures since 10CFR50.65 was I implemented in July of 1996. The percent of" Maintenance Preventable" failures is 57% at i the end of the second quarter of 1998. The Reliability Indicator for the second quarter of 1998 i shows that the percentage of failures identified as " Maintenance Preventable" and the total l number of equipment failures is trending upward. The increase in total identified failures is an expected trend attributable to increased Maintenance activities during the refueling outage.

Data Source Phelps/Swearngin/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

' Accountability: Phelps Trrnd: None I

I 47 L

i

[________-___________-_-_

l D Total Requalification Training Hours E SimulatorTraining Hours E Non-Requalification Training Hours E Number of Exam Failures 35 -

33 32 32 32 _

~

30 -

25 -

20 -

15 - 4 14 2 12 0-8 88 8 8 8

~

5-3 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0- -- i i i i i c- -

i i Cycle 97-4 Cycle 97 5 Cycle 97-6 Cycle 97 7 Cycle 98-1 Cycle 98-2 Cycle 98-3 Cycle 98-4 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING This indicator provides information on the total number of hours of training given to each crew during each cycle. The simulator training hours shown on the graph are a subset of the total training hours. Non-Requalificction Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP verification &

validation, INPO commitments, GET, Fire Brigade, Safety Meetings, and Division Manage lunches.

Exam failures are defined as failures in the written, simulator, and Job Performance Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training.

N Me: There was one individual simulator e:: amination failure during rotation 98-4.

The individual was remediated prior to returning to Licensed Operator duties.

i Data Source: Conner /Guliani (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Conner /Guliani Trend: None SEP 68 48

E SRO Exams Administered 3 SRO Exams Passed D RO Exams Administered O RO Exams Passed 4__

3--

2--

1--

0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ' 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0 l l l l l l l l l  :  ;

Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS - 1998 l i

This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Operator (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These intemally administered quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress.

During the month of July 1998, there were no (SRO) or (RO) training classes in session.

Data Source: Conner /Guliani (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Conner /Guliani Trend: None SEP 68 49

O READY MWD'S OMWD's ON HOLD MAD R1IS E3 MWR's NoT Y ET PROCESSED 350 326 SGBA ENNERG FMITS Ds N' #'

4% NRMM 37 0 0

21  : 42 4y e

May-98 Jun-98 Jul-98 MWD PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 18 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Requests (MWRs) and Maintenance Work Documents (MWDs) that have been approved for inclusion in Cycle 18 RFO. This graph indicates:

Parts Holds - Planning Com,o!ete, Awaiting Parts System Engineering Holds - Awaiting System Engineering input to Planning Planner Holds - Maintenance Planner has not completed planning the work package.

ECN Hold - Awaiting Substitute Replacement items ECN from DEN.

In Review - Planning Complete awating SE, ISI and QC review.

D:ta Source: Solymossy/ Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sollymossy/ Herman Trend: None SEP 31 l

so l [

i j

ELAST OTHIS O FOR SCHEDULE 100 -- s!

g!-

.s -

g-o> -

90 - . E 5 E E 3

80 -- "

R 70 --

g 60 --

.2 E 50 --

8

$ 40 __

30 --

20 --

10 -

0 'l 8

3 i F i I.c I J 1r  ! l f

=

o[

S,t 8w 3- 5 2

5 4 fl 8

I.i o;

I e j $

• 0g 32 i E

j3 E j 45 2 COMPONENT TESTING DEPARTMENT AND SPECIAL SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1998 OUTAGE PROJECTS STATUS REPORT i

Data Source Phelps/Bloyd/Boug hter (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Bloyd/Boughter Trend: None SEP 31 51

+ Actual FT,Date a Target PRC Date Sr26/99 SM/99 4/16/99 -

3f27/99 --

a a a e a e a a a a a e e a a 3/7/99 --

2/15/99  :  :  :

• * 'N * " " "

D  % 8 8 E5 8 "

3 1

@ 8 a

8 m

8 m l l2 a 2

m 2

m 9

8 9

8 l9 8 9

8 9

8 l

l PROGRESS OF 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE MODIFICATIONS CYCLE 19 l

This indicator shcws the status of Modificationsapproved for installation during the Cycle 19 Refueling ,

Outage (September 1999).

Ths goal for this indicator is to have all modification packages which were approved for accomplishment prior to September 25,1998, PRC approved by March 18,1999.

July 1998 Modifications added: 4 Deleted = 0 D;ta Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gambhir/Jaworski Trrnd: None SEP 31 l

52 I ________ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ - _ _ .

NO DATA AVAILABLE PROGRESS OF CYCLE 19 OUTAGE MODS AND ECNS ADDED TO 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE AFTER FREEZE DATE This indicator will show the status of Modificatbns and ECM approved for installation during the Cycle 19 Refueling Outage. The goal for this indicator is to have all modification pcckages PRC approved by their target date, July 1998 Modifications /ECM Added = 0 Deleted = 0 Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

. Accountability: Gambhir/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 33 1

i 53

+ Actual Approve Date a Target Approve Date 10/28/98 - a m ,

9/28a8 -

8/29/98 - a 7/30/98 - ,g 6/30/98 -

5 5/31/98 -

5/1/98 -

4/1/98 -

3/2/98 -

1/31/08 . . . . .

s e n 8f$822ZZ eee88888 w w w w w PROGRESS OF 1998 ON-LINE MODIFICATION PLANNING This indicator shows the status of modifications approved or in review for approval for on-line installation during 1998.

The goal for this indicator is to have all MOD /ECN packages approved by their scheduled date.

July 1998 MOD /ECN Added:3 Deleted: 0 Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gambhir/Jaworski Trend: None SEP:$1 54

1 ACTION PLANS SEP INDEX l

)

55

ACTION PLANS This section lists action plans that have been developed for theperformance indicators cited as Adverse Trends during the month preceding this report. Also included are Action Plans for indicators that have been cited in the preceding month's report as Needing increased Management Attention for three (3) consecutive months.

In accordance with Revision 5 of NOD-QP-37, the followng performance indicators would require action plans based on three (3) consecutive months of performance cited as "Needing increased Management Attention"-

Clean Controlled Area Contaminations (page 25)

The Routine Decon Schedule was revised to improve the daily maintenance of clean areas in the RCA. A status sheet with a sign-off will provide administrative guidance and controls to ensure clean areas are being properly maintained by a designated responsible person. These improvements should result in less Clean Controlled Area Contaminations.

. Radiological Work Practices Program (page 36)

Changes in the Initial General Employee Training (GET) Program are being addressed by a Training Advisory Committee to make program improvements. The On-Line Poor Ra diation Worker Practices were recently identifed by CR 199801434. Implementation of the Actions items listed below are being addressed by the Condition Report, which should result in an increased awareness for improving Rad Worker Pracitices in the RCA.

Define the role of the Shift RP Technician to reduce over relianace on the RP Staff and ensure )

Rad Workers have sufficient knowledge prior to accessing the RCA .

I Perform a Human Performance evaluation of the Survey Maps used by the Rad Workers.

Evaluate the effecuveness of the postings used in the RCA.

• Evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of the information provided at eh RCA Access Control Point.

• Ensure the RP Shift Tech has the appropiate information available.

Evaluate the content and methods of the GET Program.

• Evaluate the effectiveness of the postings used in the RCA.

• Temporary Modifications (page 39) l Based on the current trend of Temporary Modifications >6 months old (removable on-line) the Temporary j Modifications Indicator Needs increased Management Attention. One of the Temporary Modification >6 months old. ManagemTnt is exploring methods to expedite removal of the two remaining Temporary Modifications >6 months old.

56 L _ _____.-__ ____________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - . - - . _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - _ - _ - - . - - . _ _ _ _

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS & SEP INDEX  !

I PERFORMANCE INDICATOR INDEX i I

This indicator index is calculated from a weighted switches or, manual turbine trip switches (or combination of eleven performance indicator values, which push-buttons) provided in the main controiroom.

include the following: Unit Capability Factor, Unplanned Capability Loss Factor, HPSI, AFW, Emergency AC Power 4) Critical means that during the steady-state ,

System, Unplanned Automatic Scrams, Collective Radiation condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the I Exposure, Fuel Reliability, Thermal Performance , effective multiplication (k , ) was essentially equal Secondary System C%mistry, and Industrial Safety to one Accident Rate. ( Page 12)

( Page 6 ) ,

HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE The ratio of the available energy generation over a given The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) time period to the reference energy generation (the energy unavailable hours and the estimated unavailable hours for that could be produced if the unit were operated the high pressure safety injection system for the reporting continuously at full power under reference ambient period divided by the critical hours far the reporting period conditions) over the same time period, expressed as a multiplied by the number of trains in the high pressure safety percentage. ( Page 10 )

j injection system. i b

UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT RATE -INPO I The ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a given This indicator is defined as the number of accidents per period of time, to the reference energy generation (the 200,000 man-hours worked for all utility personnel l cnergy that could be produced if the unit were operated permanently assigned to the station that result in any of the continuously at full power under reference ambient following:

condrtions) over the same time period, expressed as a percentage. ( Page 11 ) 1) One or more days of restricted work (excluding the day of the accident);

UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 2) One or more days away from work (excluding the 7,000 CRITICAL HOURS day of the accident); and

3) Fatalities.

This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned Contractor personnel are not included for this indicator.

tutomatic scrams (RPS logic actuations) that occur per (Page 13) 7,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of critical operation.

AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM The value for this indicator is calculated by multiplying the PERFORMANCE total number of unplanned automatic reactor scrams in a specific time period by 7,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />, then dividing that The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) number by the total number of hours entical in the same unavailable hours and the estimated unavailable hours for time period. The indicator is further defined as follows: the auxiliary feedwater system for the reporting period divided by the critical hours for the reporting period

1) Unplanned means that the scram was not an multplied by the number of trains in the auxiliary teedwater anticipated part of a planned test. system.( Page 14 )

2) Scram means the automatic shutdown of the EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM reactor by a rapid insertion of negative reactivt PERFORMANCE (e g., by control rods, liquid injection system, etc.)

that is caused by actuation of the reactor The sum of the known (planned and unplanneo) protection system. The signal may have resulted unavailable and the estimated unavailable hoursfor the from exceeding a set point or spurious. emergency AC power system for the reporting period

3) Automate means that the initial signal that caused divided by tne ramber of hours in the reporting period actuation of the reactor protection system logic multiplied by the number m Jains in the emergency AC was provided from one of the sensor's monitoring power system.( Page 15) plant parameters and conditions, rather than the mar:ual scram 57 L__---------------------. . - - - _- - - - - - - - - -

j PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS & SEP INDEX

' THERMAL PERFORMANCE COLLECTNE RADIATION EXPOSURE The ratio of the design gross heat rate (corrected) to the Colective radiation exposure is the total external whole-body j

. adjusted actualgroes heat rate, expressed as a percentage. dose received by al on-site personnel (including (Page 16) j contractors and visitors) during a time period, as measured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). Collective FUEL REUA81LKY 96DICATOR radiation exposure is reported in unts of person-rom. This indicator tracks radiological work performance for SEP #54 This indicator is defined as the steady-state prirnary coolant (Page 19 )

1-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uran!um contribution end normaltred to a common purWicatbn rate. Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposted on reactor core INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT AND DISA8 LING INJURYALLNESS RATE Intemals from previous defective fuel or is present on the surface of fuel elements from the manufacturing process.

The purpose of this indicator is to montor progress In

_ Steady state is defined as continuous operation for at least knproving industrial safety performance for utiNty personnel three days at a power level that does not vary more than + permanently assigned to the station. Contractor work-hours cf -5%. Plants should colect data for this indicator at a are not included in this indicator. Also, this indicator is powerlevelabove 85%, when possbie. Piants that did not defined as the number of accidents for at utgity personnel operate at steady-state power above 35% should coNect permanently assigned to the statbn, involving days away data for this indiostor et the highest steady-stato power level attained during the month. from work per 200.000 man-hours worked (100 man- j years). This does not include contractor personnel This '

bdicator tracks personnelperformance for SEP #25,26 &

The dansky correctbn factor is the ratio of the specNic 27.(Page 20 )

volume of coolant at the RCS operating temperature (540 degrees F., Vf = 0.0217) divided by the spectic volume of cooient at normallendown temperature (120' F at outlet of VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOUD RADIOACTIVE WASTE th3 letdcwn cooling heat exchanger, Vf = 0.0163), which resuis in a dansky correctbn factor for FCS equal to 1.33.

(P;ge 17) This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid rmantive waste actualy shpped for burial This indicator

. also shows the volume of bw-level rodbactive waste which SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE is in temporary storage, the amount of radioactive o8 that OtDEX has been shpped off site for processing, and the volume of sold dry radbactive waste which has been shpped off-ske

- The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) is a calculatbn for processing. Low-level solid radbactive waste consists breed on the concentration of key impurtles in the of dry actiwe waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms )

secondary side of the plant. These key impurtles are the generated as a resut of nuclear power plant operstbn and most Niety cause of deterbration of the steam generators. maintenance. Dry radioactive waste includes contaminated Crteria for calculating the CPIare:

rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing,

)

pisatic containers, and any other materialto be disposed of '

1) The plant is at greater than 30 percent power; and at a low-level radbactive waste disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to al j

2) the power is changing less than 5% per day, radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of spent fuel processing. This indicator tracks radiological Thn CPI is calculated using the fobowing equation: )

work performance for SEP #54. ( Page 21 )

CPI = ((sodium /0.79) + (Chloride /1.52) +(Surate/1.44) + RECORDA8LE DiJURYALLNESS CASES FREQUENCY (frord.30) + (Copper /0.30)+(Condensate 02/2.90))/6 RATE 1

Where: Sodium, suiste, chloride and condenstte dissolved The number of injuries requiring more than normal first aid per 200,000 rnan-hours worked. This indicator trends oxygen are the rnenthly average blowdown concentrations personal performance for SEP #15,25 and 26.

In ppb, iron and copper are monthly time weighted average (Page 24 )

feedwater concentrations h ppb. The denominator for eaof

- the five factors is the INPO median value. If the monthly cverage for a specNic parameter is less than the INPO median value, the median value is used in the calculation.

(Page 18) l l

l p 58 C - __.m . _ _ _ _

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS & SEP INDEX CLEAN CONTROLLED AREA CONTAMMATIONS 2 4) 1,000 DISINTEGRATIONS / MINUTE PER PROBE AREA - Milnten:nca Problem The intent of this cause code is to capture the fut range of problems which The personnelcontaminatbn events in the clean controlled can be attributed in any way to programmatic deficiencies area. This hdicator tracks personnel performance for SEP in the maintenance functional organization. ActMties

1. 15 & 54. ( Page 25 )

included in this category are maintenance, testing, surveibance, caibration and radiation protection, PREVENTABLE #ERSOfGEL ERROR 1.ERs

5) Design /ConstructionAnstallation/ Fabric This hdostoris a breakdown of LERs. For purposes of LER emnt classifloation, a

• Preventable LER"lu defined as: ation Problem - This cause code covers a fut range of programmatic deficiencies in the areas of design, constructbn, instatation, and An event for which the root cause le personnel error (i.e.,

. fabrication (Lo., bas of control power due to m A aallon by one or more indMduais), irWe underrated fuse, equhment not qualified for administralho controis, a design construcson, insteNat6on, the environment, etc.).

Instabsson, fabrication problem (inwMng work completed by or supervloed by OPPD personnsi) or a maintenance problem 6) Equipment Failures (Electronic Piece-(aertbuted to irme or improper C ; N.,._ of plant equipment). Also, the cause of the ownt must have occurred Parte or EnvironmenteHleisted Failures)

- This code is used for spurbus failures of wlmh approdmsesty two years of the 'Ennt Dets* specified in the electronic piece $ arts and falures due to LER (e.g., an event for wh'ch the cause is attributed to a problem meteorobgical conditions such as lightning, with the original design of the piant would not be considered ice, high winds, etc. GeneraNy, it includes preventshie). '

spurious or one-time fagures. Electric components included in this category are For purposes of LER event classificadon, a ' Personnel Error

• LER circuit cards, rectfiers, bistables, fuses, h defined as fotown:

capactors, diodes, resistors, etc.

In additbn this indicator reports SEP # 6 &

An ownt for which the root cause le inappropriate ac6cn on the 61. (Page 27) part of ano or more indMduale (as opposed to being attributed to edsperenant or a generei group). Also, the inappropriass acuan VIOLATION TREND this indicator is defined as Fort must hane coeurred within approdmately two years of the ' Event Cahoun Station Cted Violatbns and Non Cted Vblations Dats'speamedin sw LER. Addlionaly, each event classified trended over 12 months. Addtionaby, CtedVblatbne for as a " Personnel Error" should also be classified as the top quartile Regbn IV plant istrended over 12 months

' Preventable." This indicator trends personnel (lagging the Fort CalhounStation trend by 2-3 months). It performance for SEP Rom #15. ( Page 26 ) is the FortCalhoun Station goal to be at or belou be cRed -

violation trend for thetopquartuoRegbn IV plant.

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE ( Page 28 ).

BREAKDOWN CENTS PER KE.OWATT HOUR Th's indicator shows the number and root cause code for

' Licensee Event Reports. The root cause codes are as The purpose of this indicator is to quantNy the economical fotows operation of Fort Calhoun Station. The cents per kRowatt hour indicator represents the budget and actual cel,u per

1) Adrninletrative Control Problem -

kilowatt hour on a twelve-month average for the current Management and supervisory deficiencies year. The basis for the budget curve is the approved yearly that affect plant programs or activties (Le., budget The basis for the actual curve is the Financial and poor planning, breakdown or lack of Operating Report.

. adequate management or supervisory ( Page 30) control, incorrect procedures, etc).

2) Uoensed Operator Error - This cause code captures errors of omission / commission by Econsed reactor operators during niant activties E

3) Other Personnel Error -

Errors of omission / commission committed by non-Icensed personnelinvolved in plant activties.

59

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS & SEP lNDEX MAINTENANCE WORKLOAD BACKLOG PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the backbg of non outage Maintenance Work Documents remaining open at the end The number of identried incidents concerning maintenance of the reporting month. Maintenance classifications are proceduralproblems, the number of closed irs related to defined as follows:

the use of procedures (includes the number of cbsed irs caused by procedural noncompliance), and the number of Corrective Repair and restoration of equpment or closed procedural noncompliance irs. This indicator trer ds components that have failed or are malfunctioning and are not performing their intended function. personnelperformance for SEP #15,41 and 44. ( Page 34)

Preventive - Actions taken to maintain a piece of CONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA equpment within design operating conditions, prevent The perceritage of the Radiation Controlled Area, which equpment failure, and extend its life and are performed prior to equpment failure, includes the auxiliary building, the radwaste building, and areas of the C/RP building, that is contaminated based on the totalsquare footage. This indicator tracks performance Non-Corrective / Plant improvements - Maintenance for SEP #54. ( Page 35) actMties performed to implement station improvements or to repair non-plant equpment.

RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM Maintenance Work Priorities are defined as:

The number of identified poor radiologbal work practices (PRWPs) for the reporting month. This indicator tracks Emergency - Condtions which significantly degrade station safety or availabuity. radiobgicalwork performance for SEP #52. ( Page 36)

Immediate Action - Equpment deficiencies which DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL) significantly degrade station reliability. Potential for unit shutdown or power reduction, The Document Review Indicator shows the number of documents reviewed, the number of documents scheduled for review, and the number of document reviews that are Operations Concern Equpment deficiencies which hinder station operation.

overdue for the reporting month. A document review is considered overdue lf the review is not complste wthin st<

months of the assigned due c' ate. This indicator tracks Essential Routine corrective maintenance on essential performance for SEP #46. ( Page 37 )

station systems and equpment.

SECURITYINCIDENTS Nor> Essential- Routine corrective maintenance on non-essential station systems and equpment.

The total number of security incidents for the reporting Plant Imptr. ,ement Non-corrective maintenance and month depicted h two graphs. This indicator tracks security plant improvements. performance for SEP #58. ( Page 38)

TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS This indicator tracks maintenance performance, for SEP #36. ( Page 32 )

The number of temporary mechanical and electrical configurations to the plant's systems.

RATID OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE &

PREFEk'TIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE 1) Temporary configurations are defined as electrical jumpers, electrical blocks,

"[he ratio of preventive maintenance (including surveillance mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks testing and caibration procedures) to the sum of non-outage corrective maintenance and preventive maintenance which are installed in the plant operating systems and are not shown on the latest completed twer the reporting period. The ratio, expressed as a percorfage, is calculated based on man-hours. Aisc revision of the P&lD, schematic, connection, wiring, or flow diagrams.

displayed are the percent of preventive maintenance items in the month that were not completed or administratively 2) Jumpers and blocks which are installed for closed by the scheduled date plus a grace period equal to Survesance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, 25% of the scheduled interval This indicator tracks Calibration Procedures, Spa::lal Procedures preventMe maintenance actMtles for SEP #41. ( Page 33 ) or Operating 60

l PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS & SEP INDEX LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS j Procedures are not considered as .

This indicator shows the number of SRO and/or RO temporary modrications unless the jumper or quizzes and exams that are administered and passed each block remains in place after the test or month. This indicator tracks training performance for SEP procedure is complete. Jumpers and blocks #68.

Instated in test or lab instruments are not (Page 49) considered as temporary modWications.

3) MWD PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 19 REFUELING Scaffold is not considered a temporary OUTAGE) modWication. Jumpers and blocks which are instaged and for which Mrs have been This hdicator shows the lotai number of Maintenance Work submtted wW be considered as temporary Requests (MWRs) and Maintenance Work Documents q'

modNlcations untR final resolution of the MR (MWDs) that have been approved for inclusion in the Cycle and the jumper or block is removed or is 18 Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance permanentlyrecorded on the drawings. This #31 Indicator tracks temporary modWications SEP ( Page 60)

1. 62 and 71.

( Page 39)

SPECIAL SERVICES ENGWEERWG AND COMPONENT TESTING DEPARTMENT,1998 OUTAGE PROJECTS ENQ1NEERWG ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR) STATUS REPORT BREAKDOWN '

This indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31.

This hdbator shows a breakdown, by age and priority of the ( Page 61)

EAR, of the number of EARS assigned to Design Engineering Nuclear end System Engineering. This Indicator tracks performance for SEP #62. ( Page 41 )

PROGRESS OF 1999 REFUELING OMAGE MODIFICATIONS CYCLE 19 ENGINEERWG CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS This indicator shows the status of Modrications approved for instaBation during the Cycle 19 Refueing Outage. This The number of ECNs that were opened, ECNs that were Indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31. ( Page 62 )

completed, and open backbg ECNs awaiting completion by DEN for the reporting month. This indicator tracks performancefor SEP #62. PROGRESS OF CYCLE 19 OLTrAGE MODS AND ECN'S l

. ( Page 42&43 ) ADDED TO '99 REFUELING OUTAGE AFTER FREEZE DATE ENGMEERWG CHANGE NOTICES OPEN This indicator wlH show the status of ModWications and ECN's approved for instatation during the Cycle 19 This indicator breaks down the number of Engineering Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance for Ch:nge Notices (ECNs) that are assigned to Design SEP #33. ( Page 63 )

Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineering, and Milntenance. The graphs provide data on ECN FaciNty Progress of 1998 On-Line modification Planning Changes open, ECN Substtute Replacement items open, and ECN Document Changes open. This indicator tracks The indicator shows the status of modWications approved or performance for SEP #62.

In review for approval for on line instaRation during 1998.

( Page 44 &46) This indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31.

(Page 64 )

IJCENSED OiPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAWMG The total number of hours of training given to each crew durhg each t;ycle. Also provided are the simulator training hours (which are a subset of the total training hours), the number of non-REQUALIFICATION training hours end the number of exam fatures. This indicator tracks training perthmarce for SEP # 68.(Page 48) 61

i '

iI i

g SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX '

The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators Index is to list performance indicators related to SEP items with parameters that can be trended.

i SEP Reference Number 15 h

. Increase HPES and IR Accountability through use of Performance Indicators Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) . . . . 34 l Recordable Injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . . .. . .24 Clean Controlled Area Contaminations 21,000 Disintegrations / Minute Per Probe Area . 25 Preventable / Personnel Error LERs . . . . . .26 SE? Reference Numbers 25. 26. & 27.

j . Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented lg3 l . Evaluate and Implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements a

implement Supervisory Enforcement of industrial Safety Standards i

h

Industrial Safety Accident and Disabling injury / Illness Rate . . . . 20 {

! Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . .. . .24 l

jg SEP Reference Number 31 E . Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWD Planning Status (Cycle 19 Refueling Outage) .. .. . . 50 1 Component Testing Department, Special Services Engineering Department 1998 Outage Projects . 51 l Progress of 1999 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 19 . . . .52 Progress of 1998 On-Line Modification Planning . . . .. .54 SEP Reference Number 33

. Develop On-Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule Progress of Cycle 19 Outage MODS and ECt8 Added to09 Refueling Outage After Freeze Date 53 L

l SEP Reference Number 36 l l . Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Workload Backlogs (Corrective Non-Outage) . 32 >

SEP Reference Numbers 41 & 44 )

. Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule

. Compliance With and Use of Procedures Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance & Preventive Maintenance items Overdue . 33 Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . . 34 SEP Reference Number 46 Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program Document Review . . 37 62 l

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX SEP Reference Number 62 EAER

• Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices Radiological Work Practices Program I .36 SEP Reference Number 64

. Complete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Collective Radiation Exposure . . ... .

, .19 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste .. . . .21 Clean Controlled Area Disintegrations 11,000 Counts / Minute Per Probe Area I Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area . . .

25

.35 SEP Reference Number 68

. Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program Security incidents . . .

.. . 38 SEP Reference Numbers 60 & 61

. Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program I . Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Licensee Report LER Root Cause Breakdown Number of Missed Surveillance Tests resulting in Licensee Event Reports . . 27 SEP Reference Number 62

, Establish interim System Engineers Temporary Modifications .. . . . 39 Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown .. . .41 Engineering Change Notice Status . .. . .42&43 Engineering Change Notices Open . . . . . .. . .44 &45 SEEEgference Number 68 I . Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and establish means to monitor Operator Training License Operator Requalification Training License Candidate Exams

. .48

. .49 i

SEP Reference Number 71

. Improve Controls over Temporary Modifications Temporary Modifications . . . . . . . .39 I  !

I l I 63 L _ _ _ __--_1 - -

Fort Calhoun Station Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates l EVENT DATE RANGE l PRODUCTION (MWH) l CUMULATIVE (MWH) !

! Cycle 6 06/11/80-09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 l

Cycle 7 12/21/81 12/03/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 Cycle 8 04/06/83-03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 e

Cycle 9 07/12/84-09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 Cycle 10 01/16/86-03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 Cycle 11 06/08/87-09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 Cycle 12 01/31/89-02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 Cycle 13 05/29/90-02/01/92 5,451,069 51,040,528 Cycle 14 05/03/92-09/25/93 4,981,485 56,022,013 Cycle 15 11/26/93-02/20/95 5,043,887 61,065,900 Cycle 16 04/14/95-10/05/96 5,566,108 66.632,007 Cycle 17 11/25/99-04/01/98 5.183,684 71,815,678 CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS " RECORDS" First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47p.m.)

First Electricity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH) September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%) May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 Days) June 8,1987-September 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468.800 KWH) October 1987 Most Productive Fuel Cycle (5.451.069 MWH-Cycle 13) May 29,1990-February 1,1992 Shortest Refueling Octage (52 days) February 20,1995-April 14,1995 64