ML20216F479
| ML20216F479 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 01/31/1998 |
| From: | OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20216F476 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9803180406 | |
| Download: ML20216F479 (59) | |
Text
_. -. _
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS l
JANUARY 1998 SAFE OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE COST EFFECTIVENESS f00'*S0$EIo!8883s3 PDR
Table of Contents / Summary Page TABLE OF CONTENTS /
SUMMARY
1 s
1 MONTHLY OPERATING REPORT.........
.4 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX TREND.
5 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX INDICATOR.....................
6 FORT CALHOUN STATION REPORT
SUMMARY
7 WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATONS Unit Capability Factor...................
9 Unplanned Capability Loss Factor 10 Unplanned Automatic Reactor SCRAMS per 7000 Hours......
11 High Pressure Safety injection System..........
12 Auxiliary Feedwater System............
. 13 Emergency AC Power System....................................
14 Thermal Performance.......................
15 Fuel Reliability Indicator..............................
16 Secondary System Chemistry 17 Collective Radiation Exposure.........
18 Industrial Safety Accident Rate
. 19 Volume of Low Level Radioactive Waste.....................................
20 SAFE OPERATIONS Disabling injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate................
22 Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate 23 Clean Controlled Area Contaminations i
l
>1,000 Disintegrations / Minute per Probe Area 24 l
I 1
l l
l
t Table of Contents / Summary Preventable / Personnel Error LERs..........................
... 25 a
1 Licensee Event Report (LER) Root Cause Breakdown....................
. 26 1
Violation Trend.............................................
27 l
COST Cents Per Kilowatt Hour................................................
... 29 i
l DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS l
M;intenance i
l Workload Backlogs (Corrective Non-Outage)
. 31 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance
............................ 32 Procedural Noncompliance incidents...
33 Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area
.... 34 Radiological Work Practices Program......
35 Document Review..................
36 Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) 37 Temporary Modifications..
... 38 Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown.............................
. 39 Engineering Change Notices Status 40 Ope n.....................
41 Licensed Operator Requalification Training 42 License Candidate Exams.
43 Cycle 18 Refueling Outage MWD Planning Status 44 Component Testing Department, Special Services Engineering Department 1998 Outage..
45 Progress of 1998 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 18....
. 46 Progress of Cycle 18 Outage MODS and ECN's Added to '98 Refueling Outage After Freeze 47 i
l 2
1 Table of Contents / Summary Progress of 1998 On= Line Modification Planning
. 48 ACTION PLANS. DEFINITIONS. SEP INDEX & DISTRIBUTION LIST Action Plan s.........................................
.. 50 Performance indicator Definitions.........................
................ 51 Safety Enhancement Program index...........................
.............. 57 Report Distribution List
.......................... 59 1
i I
\\
1 3
l t
FORT CALHOUN STATION f
JANUARY 1998 Monthly Operating Report OPERATIONS
SUMMARY
l Fort Calhoun Station (FOS) operated at a nominal 100% power level dunng January 1998. Normal maintenance and surveillance testing was completed. Station goals for 1998 were incorporated into the performance indicators.
1 O
i 4
summa Fort Calhoun 6dex Value 4th QRT.WANo Median is 86.4%
Industry M e dian index Value 100.0 90.0.
85.2 83.7 79.2 79.1 go,o _
b>
70.0 __
60.0 50.0 40.0 i
97/1 97/2 97/3 97/4 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX TREND The Wano Performance Index Trend calculation is made up of eleven variables, each value is weighted to arrive at an overall index value. WANO calculates the performance Index value based on the industry reporting the informathn each quarter. The variables are calculated over a defined period of time as listed belove.
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR WEIGHTED FACTOR TIME Unit Capability Facto;-
16 24 Months Unplanned Capability Loss Factor 12 24 Months High Pressure Safety injection 10 24 Months Auxiliary Feedwater 10 24 Months Emergency AC Power 10 24 Months Unplanned Auto Scrams /7000 Hours 8
24 Months Collective Radiation Exposure 8
24 Months Thermal Performance Indicator 6
12 Months Secondary Chemistry Indicator 7
12 Months Industrial Safety Accident Rate 5
12 Months Fuel Reliability Indicator 8
Quarterly 5
.3 i$
14.
EIN'd@W DM QrW 12.
88 88 l
gg 25 g3 e
88 de s.
gg NW 6..
33 8
h gg j
c as LIF LK1F WS
- W EMP OE UoS7 FR m
1R iseR WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX INDICATORS This graph shows the dfference between Third Qtr '97 and Fourth Qtr '97 actua! values achieved by Fort Calhoun.
CALCULATED OVERA1 YEAR PERIOD MAXIMUM VALUE TREND UCF Unit Capability Fache 16 Decrease UCLF Unplanned Capability Loss Factor 12 No Change.
HPSI High Pressure Safety injection 10 No Change AFW Auxiliary Feedwater 10 No Cnange EACP Emergency AC Power 10 Increase UAS7 Unplanned Auto Scrams / 7000 Hours 10 No Change CRE Collective Radiation Exposure 8
Decrease CALCULATED OVER A 12 MONTH PERIOD TPI Thermal Performance Indicator 6
Decrease CPI Secondary Chemistry indicator 7
increase ISAR Industrial Safety Accident Rate 5
No Change FRI Fuel Reliability indicator 8
Decrease 6
i FORT ^ '.LHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT FOR JANUARY 1998-
SUMMARY
s AVERSE TREND REPORT POSITIVE TREND REPORT A performance indicator with data representing three consecutive months of dedining perfortnance or three A performance indicator with data representing three consecutive rnonths of performance that is trending toward consecutive months of improving performance or three dedining as determined by the Manager Nuclear Licensing, i
consecutive rnonths of performance that is superior to the constitutes an adverse trend per Nuclear Operations Division stated goalis exhibiting a positive trend per Nudear Operations Quality Procedure 37 (NOD-QP-37). A supervisor whose Division Quality Procedure 37 (NOD-QP-37). The following performance hdicator exhibits an adverse trend by this performance indicators exhibited positive trends for the definition may spedfy in written form (to be published in this reporting rnonth:
report) why the trend is not adverse.The following performance indicators exhibited adverse trends for the reporting month.
Unnianned Automatic Reactor Scrams (Page 11)
Fuel Reliability Indicator (Page 16)
Hioh Pressure Safety Iniection System Safety System Performance (Page 12)
INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT Aux. Feed Water System Safety System Performance (Page 13)
A performance indicator with data for the reporting period that is inadequate when compared to the OPPD goal is defined as Emeroency AC Power System Safety System "Needing increased Management Atterdivis' per (NOD-QP-37).
l Performance (Page14)
Unit Caoability Factor (Page g)
Thermal P b wr. ace (Page 15)
Unolanned Caoability Loss Facto rfPage 10) l Industrial Safety Accident Rate (Page ig) l Cents Per Kilowatt Hour (Page 29) l Volume of Low-Level Radioactive Waste (Page 30)
Maintenance Workload Backloo (Page 31).
Ratio of Prevent,ve to Totaf Maintenance Preventive j
l j@intenance items Overoue(Page32)
)
Temocrary Modifications (Page 38) t 7
4 I
WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 8
i 5 fr#$e$ h$fi:N.Ni5yYrNr 1998 Part CtihMa Sgtf(84%)
+ Y&Cr 2000 Wt.NO IIdre try Ostf (87%)
100.o%'"["100.o%
co o%
100 o%
,,,3 s oy%
e s.4 %
E % go%
1o ly * = --;
,,b 74%,M
=
7 0 %.,.
80%..
80%..
43.7%
40%..
g 30%..
30% +
10%..
0%
3 k
E E
R 8
1 3
UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR UCF is defined as the ratio of the available energy generation over a given period of time to the reference energy generation over the same time period, expressed as a percentage. The UCF for Jaarcry 1998 was reported as 100% The year-to-date UCF was also reported as 100%, the UCF for the last 12 months (February 1997 through January 1998) was 95.1%, and the 36-month average (February 1995 through January 1998) was reported as 80.6%
Energy Losses:
Forced Outage - Condenser circulating valve repairs and leakage on Condenser "B" Event Period: September 10, thru 13,1997.
Power Reduction - Faulty Manual Transfer switch on instrument inverter "A" Event Period: August 26, thru 28,1997.
Forced Outage - F cumferential cracking of a weld dowratream of a moisture separator due to high system stresses Event Period: May 28, thru May 29,1997.
Forced Outage - Steam leak in the fourth stage extraction steam system Event Period: April through mid May 1997 The Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 87.7% and the current industry median value is approximately 83.6%. The maximum index point value for this indicator is 16.00. At the end of the Fourth Quarter 1997 the FCS Value was 13.6 which compares to the Third Quarter 1997 value of 13.5.
" Data Source:
Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Chase
-Trend:
Needing increased Management Attention i
9
c-3 C%nthly Unplanncd Capability Lrss Fact r r alho o (3
+ Y;sr 2000 WANo IIdrctry Ctcl(3.00%)
59 2>%
50%..
40%__
30.50 %
30%
24.50%
~~
0.00% p.00%
0'00 %
'
- 0 00%
~
- 0.00% I 10%
000%
h/
N
~
0%
1 b
5 k
h b
b k
UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Unplanned Capability Loss Factor (UCLF), a rolling 12-month average, the OPPD goal, and the Year 2000 WANO goal. UCLF is defined as the ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a given period of time, to the reference energy generation expressed as a percentage. Unplanned energy loss is defined as energy not produced as a result.of unscheduled shutdowns, outage extensions, or load reductions due to causes under plant management control. Energy losses are considered to be unplanned if they are not scheduled at least four weeks in advance.
The UCLF for the month ofJanuary 1998 was reported as 00.0%, the Year-To-Date UCLF was 0.00%, the UCLF for the last 12 months (February 1997 through January 1998) was 9.80%, and the 36-month average UCLF (February 1995 through JanPary 1998) was reported as 9.3% at the end of the month.
The Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 3.0% and the industry current best quartile value is approximately 3.2%. The maximum index point value for this indicatoris 12.00. At the end of the Fourth Quarter 1997 the FCS Value was 5.4 which compares to the Third Quarter 1997 value of 5.4.
Data Source:
Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Chase Trend:
Needing Increased Management Attention l
=
l 1
10
\\
- 12. Month Rosing Aver:ge
+
PCS Re:stor Sir:ms P r 7,000 Hours Critic lfor la:t 36 m:nths Fort Cilhoun Goal (0.0)
Year 2000 WANo industry Goal (1) 3..
2..
1 03 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep oct Nov Dec Jan FCS Reactor Scrams.1997 98
-4 3..
2..
l 1..
e' o
e o
e o
o o
o o
o o
Feb Mar Apr May June Juy Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER '7000 HOURS CRITICAL Tha upper graph shows the 12-month rolling average, the 36-month average, the OPPD 90:1 for 1997 and the Year 2000 WANO goal. The lower graph shows the number of unplanned automatic reactor scrams that occurred during the last 12 months. This indicator is d; fined as the number of unplanned automatic scrams that occur per 7,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of critical operation.
Th::re were no unplanned automatic reactor scrams during the month of January 1998.
Th312-month rolling average (February 1997 through January 1998) was 0. The 36-month value (February 1995 through January 1998) was 0.310.
Tha Year 2000 WANO industry goal is a maximum of one unplanned automatic reactor scram per 7,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> critical. The maximum index point value for this indicator is 8.0. At th3 cnd of the Fourth Quarter 1997 the FCS Value was 8.0 which compares to the Third Qurrter 1997 value of 8.0.
D:ta Source:
Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)
Accountability: Chase Trend:
Positive l
11
Monttdy HPSI System Unavailability V:lue i..i
+ 12 Month Rouing Average Fort Cahoun Goal (0.003) 4 Year 2000 WANoindustry Goal (0.02) j 0.02 0.015..
0.01.-
0.005 __
0 Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep oct Nov Dec Jan HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the High Pressure Safety injection (HPSI) System unavailability value, as defined by WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for January 1998.
The HPSI System unavailability value for the month of January 1998 was 0.0. There were 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of planned unavailability, and 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of unplanned unavailability. The 12 month rolling average was (February 1997 through January 1998) was 0.81 X E-5, and the year-to-date HPSI unavailability value was 0.00 x E-4 at the end of the month. For the previous year there was a total of 9.8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> of planned unavailability and 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of unplanned unavailability for the HPSI system.
The 1998 Fort Calhoun year-end goal for this indicator is a maximum talue of 0.003. The Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 0.020. The maximum index point value for this indicator is 10.0. At the end of the Fourth Quarter 1997 the FCS Value was 10.0 which compares to the Third Quarter 1997 value of 10.0.
Data Source:
Phelps/Schaffer (Manager / Source)
Accountability:
Phelps/Schaffer Trend:
Positive 12
__,__12 Month AFW Unavailability Fort Calhoun Goal (0.01)
_ _ _ _ Year 2000 WANO Industry Goal (0.020) j
- 0.025.,.
0.022
' O.02 _
0.015 __
0.013-0.009 0.01 __
0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.005 0.005 _-
0
- E,
,E,E n
. num,
Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan i
AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) System Unavailability value, as defined by WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the month of Jcnuary 1998.
Tha AFW System Unavailability Value for January 1998 was 0.005 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />. There were 8.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of planned and 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of Unplanned Train Unavailability hours during the month. The 12 month rolling average (February 1997 through January 1998) was 0.005, and the year-to-date unavailability value was 0.005 at the end of January 1998.
Tha 1998 Fort Calhoun Station year-end goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 0.01.
The Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 0.020. The maximum index point value for this indicator is 10.0. At the end of the Fourth Quarter 1997 the FCS Value was 10.0 which comparen 'o the Third Quarter 1997 value of 10.0.
Data Source:
Phelps/Fritts (Manager / Source)
. Accountability: Phelps/Fritts Trend:
Postive 13
mM 2thly Emcrg:nty AC P&wer Un3v;ilatility Valu2 Yaar-ts.Dit2 Emstg:ncy AC Pswor Unav:llability Valus Fort Calhoun Goal (0.024)
'~*~ **'
Y **' '
0.0 4..
O.035.
0.03 O.025 L 0.02.
0.015 0.01 0.005..
0
, E; i
i i
i 2
a 5
?
t
?
R 8
2 i
e EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Emergency AC Power System unavailability value, as defined by WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the month of January 1998. The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value for January 1998 was 0.010.
The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value year-to-date was 0.010 and the value for the last 12 months (February 1997 through January 1998) was 0.015.
Monthly Statistics Planned Unavailability:
DG-1: 11.5 DG-2: 15.8 Total: 27.3 YTD:
27.3 Hours Unolanned Unavailability: DG-1: 0.0 DG-2: 0.0 Total: 0.0 YTD:
00.0 Hours There were a total of 27.3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> of planned unavailability and 00.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of unplanned unavailability for the emergency AC power system in 1998.
The 1998 Fort Calhoun year-end goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 0.024. The Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 0.025. The maximum index point value for this indicator is 10.0. At the end of the Fourth Quarter 1997 the FCS Value was 9.4 which compares to the Third Quarter 1997 value of 9.2.
Data Source:
Phelps/Ronning (Manager / Source)
Accountability:
Phelps/Ronning Trend:
Positive i
i 14
e MinthlyThermalPerform:ncs
,12-Month Rolling Average j
Fort Calhoun Goal (99.7%)
+ Yeer 2000 W ANO Industry Goal (99.8%)
l 100%
.b E
E l
99%..
(
f 90%
1 k
l f
I E
E E
E k
l l
i THERMAL PERFORMANCE l
This indicator shows the monthly Thermal Performance Value, the rolling 12-month j
aver ge, the OPPD goal, and the Year 2000 WANO goal.
l Tha thermal performance value for the month of January was 100%. The year to date l
valus was reported as 100.%. The 12 month rolling average (February 1997 through l
Jcnurry 1998) was reported as 99.94%.
I I
The 1998 Fort Calhoun year-end goal for this indicator is an index value which is > 99.7%.
Tho Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 99.6%.
Tha maximum index point value for this indicator is 6.0. At the end of the Fourth Quarter 1997 th'e FCS Value was 5.5 which compares to the Third Quarter 1997 value of 5.7.
!.' Data Source:
Phelps/Naser(Manager / Source)
Accountability:.
Phelps/Naser i
Trend:
Positive j
i i
15
m Fuel Reliability (E-04 Microcuries/ Gram)
Year 2000 WANO Goal (5 E-04 Microcuries/ Gram)
~
End of 1998 Goal (17.3 E 04 Microcuries/ Gram) 3 160 -
~
'31 l 140 120..
100-.
=
80 --
60 __
m 40 --
20.
3 I
O i
i i
3 E
U D
2
,E E
,E m
a z
o z
6 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR l
The monthly FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR (FRI) for January 1998 was 131 E-04 microcuries/ gram based on steady state data at 100% power. NOTE: The end of 1997 goal was 147 E-04 microcuries/ gram, and the end of 1998 goal for this indicator is 17.3 E-04 microcuries/ gram.
Coolant activity data through January 30,1998 shows the presence of 28 leaking rods at core average power.
I If the leaking rods are at 70% or 50% of core average power, the number of leaking rods changes to 48 and 80, respectively. The increase in predicted failures from December is primarily due to the increase in Xenon.
133. The Cesium data indicates the leaking fuel is most likely in the second and third bumed fuel regions (Batches S and T) which have the original grid design. These batches will be permanently discharged from the reactor core during the spring 1998 refueling outage. However, unusual RCS activity data from early December may indicate the presence of one high power failure from the new fuel region (Batch U) with the new grid design. Confirmation of the fuel region (s) w% 'ailures cannot occur until the fuel inspection campaign di' x.g the spring 1998 refueling outage.
The Cycle 17 monthly FRl is trending slightly lower than the Cycle 16 FRI at the same time in the fuel cycle due to the large contribution of the lodine-134 from the " tramp" Uranium. The lodine-134 activity is released to the coolant from the tramp activity that is plated out on fuel assembly surfaces due to fuel failures in prior cycles.
In the FRI equation, the lodine-134 activity is subtracted from the lodine-131 activity. This cycle, the tramp activity is trending two times higher than Cycle 16 while the lodine-131 is trending similar to the Cycle 16 values at the same point in the cycle. Therefore, the Cycle 17 calculated FRI value is trending lower.
The plant is currently in Action Level 4 Standing Order SO-O-43, " Fuel" Reliability Action Plan", based on the current 28 core average power failures.
The maximum index point value for this indicator is 8.0. At the end of the Fourth Quarter 1997 the FCS Value was 0.3 which compares to the Third Quarter 1997 value of 1.9.
Data Source:
Guinn/Roenigk (Manager / Source)
I Accountability:
Chase /Stafford Trend:
Adverse 16 o
l m MonthlyChemistryIndicitor 1998 Fort Cahoun Goal (1.1) 3..
2.75.-
2.43 2.25..
2-1.75..
1.5..
1.32 1.32 1.25.
1 18 1.14 1.13 1.05 1,11 33 E
E D
E E
U
,5 o
u.
3 3
4 0
z SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY I
St:ady state plant conditons required for calculating the Secondary System Chemistry Performance Ind:x (CPI) are as follows:
- 1) the plant is at greater than 30% power.
i
- 2) the power is changing at less than 5% per day.
The CPI for January 1998 is 1.10. The CPI value for the past 12 months (February 1997 through knu ry 1998) was 1.26. The CPI value in the industry's upper quartile is 1.17. Six parameters are used in the CPI calculation. Four of the parameters were below the WANO mean value which are as follows: 1) steam generator chloride, 2) sulfate, 3) feedwater iron, and condensate pump disch rge dissolved oxygen. Slight increase in CPI observed this month due to power reduction for work on Stator Cooling Heat Exchangers. Morpholine injection began this month for iron reduction.
R:sults of analysis are inconclusive at this time. Trending continues.
Tha maximum index point value for this indicator is 7.00. At the end of the Fourth Quarter 1997 the FCS Value was 5.0 which compares to the Third Quarter 1997 value of 3.3.
D:t2 Source:
Hamilton /Ostien (Manager / Source)
, Accountability: Hamilton Tr:nd:
None 17
, MrdhtyPasamelRafalanEposure(ED) j CBEf%rsannelEhsedonTIDGRS FCSGbel224El OEBeedonEDFbmW j
2 D-6.
200.
4.
120.
3.
100.
2.
fiO.
1.
0 0
1 2
3 4
4@ $} }$4
{ $8 COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE The 1998 goal for Collective Radiation Exposure (CRE) at Fort Calhounn Station was established for a Total Don of 224.0 person-rem, based on TLD readings. Dose is tracked monthly by obtaining Electronic Dosimeter (ED) readings, until the Quarterly TLD readings are obtained. The exposure for January 1998 was 4.238 Person-rem (ED).
Dose FCS Goal Person-Rem First Qtr.
Second Qtr.
Third Qtr.
Fourth Qtr.
Total Person-Rem 224.0 The total 3 year CRE value, from the First Quarter 1995 through the Fourth Quarter of 1997, was 40S.090 Person-Rem which averages out to 135.030 Person-Rem per year. The Year 2000 WANO industry goal for Collective Radiation Exposure is 107 person-rem per year. The maximum index point value for this ir,dicator is 8.00. At the end of the Fourth Quarter 1997 the FCS CRE Value was 7.0 compared to the Third Quarter 1997 CRE Value of 7.1.
Data Source:
Chase / Williams (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Chase /Gehers Trend:
None SEP 54 e
18
l
\\
Monthly Industrial Accident Rate 12 Month Rolling Average FCS Year.End Goal (<0.5) o Year 2000 WANOlndustry Goal (<0AO) 0.6..
0.5 h
~
DA.
I 0.3 0.1 0:
Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep oct Nov Dec Jan INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT RATE Th3 purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in improving industrial safety performance for utility personnel permanently assigned to the station. Contractor work-hours are not included in the indicator. This indicator is defined as the number of accidents i
per 200,000 work-hours worked for all utility personnel permanently assigned to the station th:t result in any of following:
one or more days of restricted work (excluding the day of the accident.)
One or more days away from work (excluding the day of the accident.)
Fatalities.
ISAR = (number of restricted-time accidents + lost-time accidents + fatalities) x 200.000 (number of station person-hours worked)
Tha Fort Calhoun Station industrial safety accident rate for the month of January 1998 was 0.00. The 12 month rolling average (February 1998 through January 1998) was 0. The year
- to dite value was 0 at the end of January 1998.
Th::re were no restricted-time and no lost-time accidents in January 1998. The 1998 Fort C:lhoun year-end goal is 50.5. The Year 2000 WANO industry goal is 50.40.
The maximum index point value for this indicator is 5.0. At the end of the Fourth Quarter 1997 ths FCS Value was 5.0 which compares to the Third Quarter 1997 value of 5.0.
D:ta Source:
Sorensen/Blumenthal (Manager / Source)
Chase / Booth (Manager / Source)
, Accountability: Chase /Short Tr:nd:
Positive 19
1 m M onthly Volum e of LLRW (cu. ft.)
l Year to Date Cum ulative Radioactive Waste Buried 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (800 cu.ft.)
900 800..
700--
600 +
j600 60 300..
200 100..
O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun J ul Au0 Sep Oct Nov Dec VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE This indicator shows the volume of the monthly Radioactive Waste buried, the cumulative year-to-date radioactive waste buried, and the Fort Calhoun goal.
Ft 8
_m*
Amount of solid radwaste shipped off-site for processing during current month :
0.0 0.00
. Volume of solid radwaste buried during January 1998 :
120.3 3.36 Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste buried in 1998 :
120.3 3.36 Amount of solid radwaste in temporary storage :
00.0 0.00 The Year 2000 WANO industry goalis 30 cubic meters (1,071 cubic feet) per year. The industry upper ten percentile value is approximately 27.33 cubic meters (965.3 cubic feet) per year.
l l
1 Data Source:
Chase /Breuer (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Chase /Gebers Trend:
Positive SEP 54 20
O SAFE OPERATIONS Goal: A proactive, self-critical and safety conscious culture is exhibited throughout the nuclear organization.
Individuals demonstrate professionalism through self-ownership and personal initiative and open communication.
)
e e
21
[.
1
)
+ M onthly Disabling injuryllliness Frequency 199 8 F.C.S. Year to Date Goal (0.5) 0.6 _ _
0.5 0.4..
0.3._
0.2 __
0.1 __
0 -
E
?
5 k
,5 5
x x
DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE (LOST-TIME ACCIDENT RATE)
This indicator shows the January 1998 Disabling injury / Illness Frequency Rate.
i For the month of January 1998 the disabling injury / illness frequency rate was 0.00.
Th::ro were no disabling injury / illness cases reported for January 1998.
Tha 1998 Fort Calhoun Station year-end goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 0.5.
,.D:ta Source:
Sorensen/Blumenthal (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Chase /Gebers
. Trend:
None SEP 25,20 & 27 l
22
f Monthly Recordable Injury /lliness l
+
9Nort C houn YTD Goal (1.5) 4.5..
4..
3.5..
3..
2.5 2..
1.5.. :
1..
0.5
. 0 0
N
?
?
?
8 RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE This indicator shows the monthly Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate A recordable injury / illness case is reported if personnel from any of the Nuclear Divisions are injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid.
The recordable injury / illness frequency rate for the month of January 1998 was 0.00.
The 1998 Fort Calhoun Station year-to-date goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 1.5.
Data Source:
Somosen/Blumenthal (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Gebers Trend:
None SEP 15,25,26 & 27 j
23
l i
Contamination Events (Monthly)
Contamination Events (YTD) 70 y I
60..
[
50..
40..
30..
i l
20..
10..
0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec l
I CLEAN CONTROLLED AREA CONTAMINATIONS >1,000 DISINTEGRATIONS / MINUTE PER PROBE AREA I
This indicator shows the Personnel Contamination Events in the Clean Controlled Area for contcminations >1,000 disintegrations / minute per probe area for January 1998.
Th:ro were 8 personnel contamination events in January 1998. The total year-to-date of Personnel events is 8 at the end of January 1998.
D:tn Source:
Chase / Williams (Manager / Source)
. Accountability : Chase /Gebers Tr:nd:
None SEP 15 & 54 l
I~
)
l 24
i as
-+ Toki Emu 18 Month Totais so.
. _,_ Proventable J
25
-* Personal Error j
m.
=
5 5
~
~
~
5-O s
s s
a s
s a
a a
a a
a a
a a
a a
a 4 IA8 i
j 4
$ 4I4
% IA$
PREVENTABLE / PERSONNEL ERROR LERs This indicator depicts 18-month totals for numbers of " Preventable" and " Personnel Error" LERs.
The graph shows the 18-month totals for preventable LERs, the 18-month totals for Personnel Error LERs, and the Personnel Error totals for each month. The LERs are trended based on the LER event date as opposed to the LER report date.
In December 1997, there was no event which was subsequently reported as an LER. No LER's were categorized as " Preventable" and no LERs were categorized as " Personnel Error" during the month of December. The total LERs for the year 1997 was Seventeen. The total Personnel Error LERs for the year 1997 was five.
The year-to-date goal for this indicator is that the year-end values for the 18-month totals not exceed 5 Preventable and 2 Personnel Error LERs. The 1997 goal for year-to-date was <5
" Preventable Errors" and <2 " Personnel Errors," LERs.
NOTE:
Due to the way LERs are tracked & reported, this indicator lags by one-month.
Data Source: Tills /Matzke (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Chase Trend:
None SEP 15 25
Msc 10%
Adniq 28%
Design 31 %
Lo BT.
14 %
3] Q'l Abint.
other Br.
7%
10%
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) P' T' CAUSE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the LERs by event date i
m oy Root Cause Code for each of the past eighteen months from July 1,1996,inri _gt cember 31,1997. To be consistent with the Preventable / Personnel Error Lens indicator, this indicator is reported by the LER event date, as opposed to the LER report date.
The cause codes are intended to identify possible programmatic deficiencies. For detailed descriptions of these codes, see the " Performance Indicator Definitions" section of this report.
NOTE: r?ue to the way LERs are tracked & reported, this indicator is one-month behind, There was no events in December 1997 that resulted in a LER. There were no missed survt illance tests resulting in LER s during December 1997. The 1997 Fort Calhoun monthly goal for this indicatoris 0.
! Data Source:
Tills /Matzke (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Chase Trend:
None SEP 60 & 61 26
96 9 OJVFNT gegp g
FCS Citad Vksutions (Monthly) 5.
a FCS Non-Citad Viobtions (Monthly) s.
2.
W 10.
E 8
m E e
E 7
8
_l E-g E
8.
8-6 8
I E
4' E
E E
E s
4 4
_ I 2
2 g
l 2
ofE.m;E, 11.
Ti I
T I-
~
o o
- iG
- }Q eat E5 2
1s8 8
8 5
.5 5
}
l VIOLATION TREND This indicator depicts twelve months of violation data for Fort Calhoun Station. Illustrated monthly are Cited Violatione and Non-Cited Violations. The current SALP cycle began on August 3,1997 and ends on January 30,1999.
The following inspection reports noting violations were received during January 1998:
Violation Level IER No.
Title I
None To date, OPPD has received twenty five violations for inspections completed in the current SALP cycle.
L5/ vel lll Violations 1
LevelIV Violations 14 Non-Cited Violations 10 Total 25 The 1998 Fort Calhoun Station Goal for this performance indicator is to be at or below the cited violation trend for the top quartile plants in Region IV.
Data Source:
Tills /Cavanaugh (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Tills Trend:
None 27
COST
~
Goal: Operate Fort Calhoun Station in a manner that cost effectively maintains nuclear generation as an economically viable contribution to OPPD's bottom line.
Cost consciousness is exhibited at all levels of the organization.
28
l l
+ Actuai
-.e_.
Budget
._e_.
Ran 3.80 3.s0.
- ^**
w 3.20.
4 3.00.
"M
~ ~
2.80.
2.60.
2A0.
2.20.
2.00,
a:
- E R a
~
+
' t 8 ggg8
-$jj5 8,i 4 e i e j t <t 6 i A e 3
w a
)
i CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR December 1997 The purpose of this indicator is to quantify the economical operation of Fort Calhoun Station. The Cents Per Kilowatt Hour indicator represents the budget and actual cents per kilowatt hour on a 12-month rolling average for the current year. The basis for the budget curve is the approved 1996 and 1997 revised budgets. The bas'] for the actual curve is the Financial and Operating Report.
The December 31 amounts are also shown for the prior years 1992 through 1996. In addition, the report shows the plan amounts for the years 1998 through 2002 for reference. The basis for the dollars are the j
Nuclear Long Range Financial Plan and the 1997 Corporate Planning and Budget Review. The basis for the generation is provided by Nuclear Fuels.
The 12 month rolling average unit price period of( January,1997 through December,1997) averaged above the budget due to 12-month rolling expenses exceeding the budget and the 12 month budgeted generation falling below budget. The 12 month rolling average (01/97 through 12/97) is 2.70 cents per kilowatt hour.
The year-to-date average is trending in a downward direction.
Cents per KWH Jan Feb Mar Apr May.lun Jul Aua Sen Oct Nov Dec Budget Y T-D 2.83 2.67 2.58 2.55 2.46 2.46 2.49 2.47 2.49 2.48 2.46 2.44 Actual Y T-D 2.89 2.60 2.54 2.75 2.99 2.90 2.83 2.79 2.79 2.73 2.72 2.70
, NOTE: This information normally lags by a month due to the short tum around required for processing.
Data Source: Lounsberry/ Dent (Manager / Source)
. Accountability: Lounsberry l
l Trend:
Needing increased Management Attention 29
)
DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Goal: Achieve high standards at Fort Calhoun Station resulting in safe, reliable and cost effective power production.
I
\\
e 30
6 Corrective Mabtenance a Preventive Maintenance a Non-Corrective /Pla nt im provete e nte f ort Calhoun Goal (200)
.0 0 _
roe -
'a
.u
.0 0.
u, 321 300 +.
p 200 100.
W 0
2 i
k i
k A
E 8
i E
4 Non-Ostage Maintenance Work Document Backlop P e a c s N T O F M W D1 P AS T G O AL S Y P R IO R rTV 3
g-
'"'i' s
g 2D..
0 0
i 6
i @f?
Al tD E
0 f*"I
',a,'; a Q#R:p 1
2 3
4 5
- w; W,
,,i.,
es MAINTENANCE WORKLOAD BACKLOG This indicator shows the backlog of non-outage Maintenance Work Documents remaining open at the end of the reporting month. It also includes a breakdown by maintenance cirssification and priority. The 1998 goal for this indicator is 200 non-outage corrective j
maintenance MWDs. The current backlog of corrective MWDs is 222 to ensure that the MWD backlog is worked in a timely manner, non-outage maintenance completion goals h va been established as follows:
GQal Priority 1 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Priority 2 7 days Priority 3 30 days Priority 4 90 days 1
Priority 5 As resources permit l
The Corrective Maintenance workload backlog goal is 200 for 1998.
~ D:ta Source:
Chase / Johnson (Manager / Source)
Accountability:
Chase /Clemens Trend:
Needing Increased Management Attention SEP 36 31
i Ratio of Preventive 13 Total Maintenance 90%.
84 %
79%
79%
77%
74 %
76 %
80% -
74 %
i h
70%.
65 %
61 %
60% -. g M
V7 52 %
g.
50%..
'it 14 1
h
[
(M h k
~
5 40%-.
3
[$
E O
30%.
l?
20% -
gi g
$g g:1;'
f M
10%.
g
{
j M
0%
\\
1
~
'E Ili E
D E
E E
y
,E o
e w
a z
z
=
z o
a Preve ntive M ainte na nce item s Overdue Fort Calhoun Goal 2%
5.50%
5%
4%
D 3.05 %
3.c 3 %
2.s n g
3%-_
2,4, g h
2% --
c.s s %
o.s s %,,,,, o.3 n p,
g is.
o.e s %,,,, g b
N N
A R
e-r-m c%
5 k
E k
N I
?
E E
N l
RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The top graph shows the ratio of completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance. The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 79% for the month of January 1998.
The lower graph shows the percentage of scheduled preventive maintenance items that i
were not completed by the late finish date. From the period of December 15th thru l
January 15th there were 15 PM's that were completed late or not completed out of 451 l
scheduled.
The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goal for the percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue is a maximum of 2%.
Data Source: Chase / Johnson (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Chase /Clemens Trend:
Needing Increased Management Attention SEP 41 & 44 32
Human Performance CRs (Maintenance) 20 __
18 __
16 __
14 14 __
12 __
k 10 __
g 8
7 S
6__
5 4
4 4__
3
{
2 i
2__
0 June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan i
PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS
(
(MAINTENANCE)
This indicator shows the number of Condition Reports related to procedural noncompliance incid:nts assigned to the Maintenance Department.
i i
D;.ta Source:
Clemens/Burggraf (Manager / Source)
I, Accountability:
Chase /Clemens Trend:
None SEP 15,41 & 44 33
i h
Contaminated Radsten Controlled Area i
1998 Fort CalhounGoal(5'/4 6*/...
?
4.8%
5%._
4%_.
3%
2%.
1%.-
0%
1 4
E S
N 5
h U
m o
e 4
v)
O z
o 7
L E
4 3
4 CONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA This indicator shows the percentage of the Radiologically Controlled Area (RCA) that is contaminated based on the total square footage of 70475. At the end of January 1998, the total contaminated area was 3383 square feet which is 4.8 percent of the RCA. The monthly FCS goal for 1998 is a Maximum of 5% Contaminated Area.
Data Source:
Chase / Williams (Manager / Source)
Accountability:
Chase /Gebers -
Trend:
None SEP54 9
4 34
._,_ Poor Radi ti*n Worker Practices 1998 Fcrt Calhoun Gori (<20)
Total PRWP for 1998 20 18.
16.
14.
12.
10.
8.
6.
4.
3 2I 0..
Jan Feb Wr Apr Wy June July Aug sep oct tbv Dec RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM Th3 Radiological Work Practices Program indicator shows the number of Poor Radiological Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reporting month.
Tha number of PRWPs which are identified each month should indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance.
Th!.S indicator needs increased management attention due to a 3 month increasing trend of poor radiation worker practices based on YTD.
During the month of January, there was 3 PRWP identified.
Th:ra have been a total of 3 Poor Radiation Worker Practices in 1998.
The 1998 FCS goal is <20 PRWPs, the 1997 goal was <15 PRWPs.
- D;ta Source:
Chase / Williams (Manager / Source)
Accountability:
Chase /Gebers
.Tr;nd:
None SEP52 35 1
l l; Documents Scheduled for Review g Document Reviews complete during month g Documents Overdue 400 350."
~
300 250 200 __
j 150 100 l
E+ I
_. (
+_
g 3
2 e
o E
8 A
o A
I 1997-1998 DOCUMENT REVIEW The Document Review indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month. The documents reviews are performed in-house and include Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual.
During January 1998, there were 249 document reviews scheduled, while 146 reviews were completed. At the end of the month, there were 119 document reviews more than 6 months overdue. There were 2 new documents initiated during January 1998.
I Data Source:
Ponec/Plath (Manager / Source)
Accountability:
Ponec Trend:
None SEP 46 9
36
i 1
as 30 as -
A
\\
A/\\
l
~
C 2\\
es A d'N\\
,/
'A..
Y
\\
a.
Vf
.. ~ 4 s-m f f JAN FhB MAR A R MAY JUN J L A G SNP Ob' NoV DEC 98 Loggables 98 Non-Loggables 97 Loggables 97 Non-Loggables i
SECURITY INCIDENTS The Security Performance Indicators for 1998 have been changed to more accurately evaluate, track, cnd trend all incidents within the security depadment. The Loggable and Non-Loggable incidents (Security) Indicator are depicted in the chart above. The chart depicts the total number of loggable cnd non-loggable human error events and system failures which occurred during the reporting month.
During the month of January 1998, there were 32 loggavie incidents and 18 non-logt, o 3 incidents
{
id:ntified. System failures accounted for 75% of the total events. Of the seventeen (17) numan error ev:nts, twelve (12) were intemal and five (5) were extemal. Twelve (12) of seventeen (17) computer f ilures were related to a voltage fluctuation problem in IRMU 2. I&C and system engineering are f
continuing in their attempts to resolve the problem. There were 9 events concerning errors by J
security force personnel in both the loggable and non-loggable area. Security force errors continues to be an organizational concem.
This indicator provides information on security performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)
Item No. 58.
- Data Source:
Sefick/Woemer (Manager / Source)
Accountability:
Sefick
. Trend:
None SEP 58 37
e T:rnpor:ry Modifications >1-cycb old (RFo requirrd for rcmoval) a T:mpor ry Modific tions >6 rnonths Cid (Remoyabb crt-lina)
Fort Calh un GSc3 f:r >1-cycb cnd >6 months old 3
3.
2.5.
2 2
2 2
22 2
2 2
2 2
2 22 n
Feb Mar A pr May June July Aug Sep oct Nov Dec Jan TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS This indicator provides information on the number of Temporary Modifications (TMs) greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage (RFO) for removal and the nurnber of TMs removable on-line that are greater than six months old.
At the end of January 1998, there were two (2) TMs that were greater than one-fuel cycle old requiring an outage for removal. TM 96-014, Reactor Coolant Gas Vent Line Pressure High Alarm, was installed April 22,1996. Repairs for this TM were completed during the 1996 RF0, but the reactor coolant gas vent line pressure is still high. MR-FC-97-011 was initiated to solve this problem and currently DEN is planning the modification. MR-FC-97-011 is expected to be completed during the 1998 RFO. TM 96-018, Equipment Drain Header Soft Rubber Patch was installed June 16,1996. MWO 963468 has been written to replace the piping and is currently scheduled for the 1998 RFO.
At the end of January 1998, there were two (2) TMs installed that were greater than six months old that could be removed on-line. TM 96-039, Railroad Siding / Corridor 26 Door, was installed November 1,1996.
EAR 97-219 will close this TM. EAR 97-219 requires Component Testing review and approval. EAR 97-219 is expected to be completed by May 1,1998. TM 97-016, Replace FP-782 with a Pipe Cap or Plug, was installed on July 29,1997. ECN 91-535/FDCR 97-0074 will be used to close this TM. FP-782 has been rebuilt by the vendor using new intemals. FP-782 was reinstalled and TM 97-018 closed on February 13,1998.
At the end of January 1998, there was a total of sixteen (16) TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun Station.
Eleven (11) of the sixteen (16) installed TMs require an RFO for removal and all are scheduled for completion during the 1998 Refueling Outage. Five (5) are removable on-line. In 1998, a total of two (2)
TMs have been installed. At the end of January 1998, there were four (4) procedural or maintenance configuration alterations (PMCAs)(a special classification of TM) installed in the Fort Calhoun Station using PRC approved procedures which are controlled by Standing Order O-25.
Data Source:
Phelps/ Frank (Manager / Source)
Accountability:
Phelps/ Core Trend:
Needing increased Management Attention SEP 62&71 t
38
E A R e R e q uirle g E n g In e e r an 3 C le s e e el. N eI la Cle s e e e t W SE D DEN 4,
34 3g,
II IO 28 21
~
10 14 10 93 10 7
8 6
6 6
e M
Nov Dec Jan Nov Dec Jan Nov Dec Jan Nov D ec Jan 0 3 M o n th s 3 6 M o n th s 8 12 M o n ta s
> 12 M o n th s a Engineering Response g Closecut(SE) 30 9,
20 4
10.-
2 2 o
1 1
3 1
3 1
0 0
0 I
I Priority 0 Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority $
Priority 6 0E s
Closeout g
o ve rd ue O
S che d ule Reponses 60.3%
31.9 %
R:spo 107 9 O ve rd u e Clo s o o uts 7.8 %
ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of EARS assigned to Design Engineering and System Engineering. ins 1998 year-end goal for this indicator is a maximum of 120 outstanding EARS.
The Total EAR breakdown is as follows:
EARS opened during the month 19 EARS closed during the month 35 Total EARS open at the end of the month 116 D:ta Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source)
. Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Trend:
None SEP 62 39
88 223 100 345 60 L 8 EO M C O NST.
DEN
>6 Months 0 3 Months 33
$2%
23 %
74 78 8%
131 %
3-6 Months 8%
i iy, D
ECN STATUS-CVERALL BACKLOG 35 16 G B a cklo g g e d O Received g3 C o m ple te d o.3 Months 3-6 Months 6 */.
2su 50 v
150_,118 117 128 112 102 100
>6 Months 18 2s 4%
y24 to 523 14 f 2826 5 23 28
.L,7 24 50 _
,em Em mm Am
-50 "- Aug 88P Oct Nov Dec Jan DESIG4EN3MERN3 3
250 T
$ ' a a a'a =
200 +
s,sg
>s u onths s2.s%
150__
86 2
100._st 84 77 74 74 o.s u onth.
2.3 %
17
-}10 q10
] 14 h'16 q16 13
?
8 50 -
12 13 6
3 0
de C
m Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan SNN6m g:s is 250 217 204 213 220 227 228 3,4 c.3 M onth, e
>6 M onths 7.0 %
s.6 M onths 200. p
~1 7
13 6 8
7 5
2 3
4 l
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan PROCUREerT/CONSRXmON l
6 250 0 3 Months 3-6 M onths 200.
16.7%
119%
l
~46 49 49 44 l
50 -
222 2631 2631 19 38 34 36 28 97 19 0
>6 Months l
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 69.4 %
~
~
~
ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Jaworski/Phelps I
Trend:
None SEP62 i
40 l
l l
i 84
'8 79 801 Priority PriMey M
DC TYPE FC TYP E Sare k
j-S Y
j reiU y(
_j 3"*
,,,2",,
Total Open ECNs a 438 Total Open ECNs = 438 59%
k'" ;. !'". !,"!. *
' M 'D
- tFQn ua-in en a2 40 in.
,s
.7
,o,
22 n m ea re a
na 50 37 38 33 42 48 4
I I
40.
20.
51 4s 52 46 45 42 0
i
^ " ' " '
"",..., c a'... ac t.*3,..
2#
" ', * ',#Y 2
Pr oesty g
g 200,
l 9
3 8
I"
,182 14 %
- 150, 5
16 7 U5 82 25 87 so 31 N
27 27 ss 28 30 O!
U N
3 Aug97 Sep-ST Oct-97 Nmr 87 Dec 97 Jan-te Sthstitute Replacemerit item ECNs Open 900,
g3 80.
17 9
m s as 16 11 3
N 5'
So h
D IM
>=
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Document Change ECNs Open ENGINEERING GHANGE NOTIGES OPEN Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager Source)
Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Trend:
None SEP 62 41
O Tot;l Requalific tion Tr;lning Hours g Simuistor Training Hours g Non-Requalification Training Hours D Number of Exam Failures 35 -
33 33 31 31 30,
~
25._
22 20.-
gg 15.
4 4
2 2
10 -
e
,a e
88 8
5.
3 2 9 0
0 0
0 0
0000 0___
_+
4_
i i
Cycle Cycle Cycle Cycle Cycle Cycle Cycle Cycle Cycle 96 7 97 1 97 2 97-3 97-4 97 5 97 6 97 7 98 1 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING This indicator provides information on the total number of hours o'itraining given to each crew during each cycle. The simulator training hours shown on the graph are a subset of the total training hours. Non-Requalification Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP verification &
validation, INPO commitments, GET, Fire Brigade, Safety Meetings, and Division Manager lunches.
Exam failures are defined as failures in the written, simulator, and Job Performance Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training.
Note: Rotation 97-6 was the Annual Licensed Operator Requalification Examination rotation for 1997. There were Three (3) individual and one (1) crew simulator exam failures during rotation 97-6. All remediations were completed prior to the end of the exam week.
There are no new performance indicators for January 1998 because Rotation 98-1 of Licensed Operator Requalification has not been completed, and there are no initial Licensed Operator classes currently in session.
Data Source:
Conner /Guliani(Manager / Source)
Accountability:
Conner /Guliani Trend:
None SEP 68 42 3
a SRo Exrms Administer:d O SRo Ex:ms #c:ccd O Ro Exams Administered g RO Exams Passed 10..
77 77 77 77 l
5.
l 00 00 00 00 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0
Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep oct Nov Dec Jan LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS - 1998 This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Operator (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally administered quizzes and ex ms are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress.
During the month of January 1998, there were no (SRO) or (RO) training classes in session. The nsxt license class is. scheduled to begin in July,1998.
Data Source:
Conner /Guliani(Manager / Source)
Accountability:
Conner /Guliani
. Trend:
None SEP 68 43
OTW Outsee M W D HOLDS Planner Enginee ng teso.
Scio 25%
19%
l 1400.
ett p
IN EW ECNs m
m m
~
_ E" Age 7 Sep47 O$47 M
Dec47
.hn46 MWD PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 18 REFUELING OUTAGE)
This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Requests (MWRs) and Maintenance Work Documents (MWDs) that have been approved for inclusion in the Cycle 18 Refueling Outage. This graph indicates:
Parts Holds - Planning Complete, Awaiting Parts System Engineering Holds - Awaiting System Engineering Input to Planning Planner Holds - Maintenance Planner has not completed planning the work package.
ECN Hold - Awaiting Substitute Replacement items ECN from DEN.
In Review - Planning Complete awating SE, ISI and OC review.
Data Source:
Chase / Johnson (Manager / Source)
Accountability:
Chase / Herman Trend:
None SEP 31 44
{
gLAST OTHIS g FOR SCHEDULE E
E 1g g
a g
g g
g g
e0 __
g:
g 70 +
60..
{ 50 __
40 30.-
20..
10._
0 5
5 h
?
l h?
ab II E
I
}{
is 3
E
?!
il u
a
{
m!
i s'
A
=
COMPONENT TESTING DEPARTMENT AND SPECIAL SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1998 OUTAGE PROJECTS STATUS REPORT Data Source Phelps/Bloyd/Boughter (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Phelps/Bloyd/Boughter Trend:
None SEP 31 G
45
i
= s e
n
~
"~ig isms g
=
- a a
=
e
=
7/30/97. *O s
s N
i :
i s
i 2
s
=
3/2/97.
1/31/97.
1/1/97 111111111!!
PROGRESS OF 1998 REFUELING OUTAGE MODIFICATIONS CYCLE 18 This indicator shows the status of Modifications approved for installation during the Cycle 18 Refueling Outage (March 1998).
The goal for this indicator is to have all modification packages which were identified prior to March 20,1997, PRC approved by September 15,1997.
January 1998 Modifications added: 0 Deleted = 0 Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Gambhir/Jaworski Trend:
None SEP 31 p
46
o Actual PRC Date aTarget PRC Dat]
1/27/98.
1/7/96.
12/18/97.
11/28/97..
f 11/8/97..
h 10/19/97.
9/29/97.
9/9/97 5Ehk3 08898 w w w
PROGRESS OF CYCLE 18 OUTAGE MODS AND ECN'S ADDED TO '98 REFUELING OUTAGE AFTER FREEZE DATE This indicator will show the status of Modifications and ECN's approved for installation during the Cycle 18 Refueling Outage. The goal for this indicator is to have all modification packages PRC approved by their target date.
J:nuary 1998 Modifications /ECN's Added = 1 Deleted = 0 i
D ta Source:
Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)
Accountability: Gambhir/Jaworski Trend:
None SEP 33 i
9 i
y l
47
o ActualPRCDate o Target PRC Date i
7/30/98.
e e
5/31/98.
5/1/98.
4/1/98.
3/2/98.
1/31/98 R
R 2
2
?
E E
E m
m PROGRESS OF 1998 ON-LINE MODIFICATION PLANNING This indicator shows the status of modifications approved or in review for approval for on-line installation during 1998.
The goal for this indicator is to have all modification packages PRC approved by their scheduled date.
January 1998 Modifications Added: 0 Deleted: 0 Data Source:
Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)
Accountability:
Gambhir/Jaworski Trend:
None SEP 31 4
6 48
O h
e ACT!ON PLANS SEP INDEX &
DISTRIBUTION LIST ti e
49
ACTION PLANS This section lists action plans that have been developed for the performance indicators cited as Adverse Trends during the month preceding this report. Also included are Action l
Pl:ns for indicators that have been cited in the preceding month's report as Needing increased Management Attention for three (3) consecutive months.
In accordance with Revision 5 of NOD-QP-37, the following performance indicators would l-require action plans based on three (3) consecutive months of performance cited as i
"Needing increased Management Attention":
Fuel Reliability Indicator (page 16)
Based on the current number of predicted fuel failures and expectation that future fuel failures will be identified, Fuel Performance functional area performance is considered to be POOR for 4th quarter of 1997. The plant is currently in " Action Level 4" in accordance with Standing Order O-43, " Fuel Reliability Action l
Plan," based on the current number of core average power failed rods (28).
I l
l l
[
e l
l a
e 50 l
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS & SEP INDEX l
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR INDEX 4)
Critical means that during the steady-state condZ of the reactor prior to the scram, the effective This indicator ir dex is calculated from a weighted combination multiplication (k,, ) was essentially equal to one l of eleven performance indicator values, which include the
( Page 11) j following: Unit Capability Factor, Unplanned Capability Loss Factor, HPSI, AFW, Emergency AC Power System, l
Unplanned Automatic Scrams, Collective Radiation Exposure, HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SAFET Fuel Reliability, Thermal Performance, Secondary System SYSTEM PERFORMANCE Chemistry, and Industrial Safety Accident Rate.
(Page 6 )
The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) unavaita bours and the estimated unavailabin hours for the high pressure safety injection system for the reporting period {
UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR divided by the critical hours for the reporting period multiplj by the number of trains in the high pressure safety injectio; The ratio of the available energy generation over a given time system.
period to the reference energy generation (the energy that could be produced if the unit were operated continuously at INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT RATE - INPO full power under reference ambient conditions) over the same time period, expressed as a percentage. ( Page 9 )
This indicator is defined as the number of accidents per 200,000 man-hours worked for all utility personnel permanently assigned to the station that result in any of the UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR following:
The ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a given 1)
One or more days of restricted work (excluding th<
period of time, to the reference energy generation (the energy day of the accident);
that could be produced if the unit were operated continuously 2)
One or more days away from work (excluding the at full power under reference ambient conditions) over the day of the accident); and same time period, expressed as a percentage. ( Page 10 )
3)
Fatalities.
Contractor personnel are not included for this indicator.
(Page 12 )
UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7,000 CRITICAL HOURS AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned PERFORMANCE automatic scrams (RPS logic actuations) that occur per 7,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of critical op& ration.
The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) unavailabl hours and the estimated unavailable hours for the auxiliary The value for this indicator is calculated by multiplying the feedwater system for the reporting period divided by the total number of unplanned automatic reactor scrams in a critical hours for the reporting period multiplied by the numt specific time period by 7,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />, then dividing that number of trains in the auxiliary feedwater system.( Page 13 )
by the total number of hours critical in the same time period.
The indicator is further defined as follows:
EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFEiY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 1)
Unplanned means that the scram was not an anticipated part of a planned test.
The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) unavailabt and the estimated unavailable hoursfor the emergency AC 2)
Scram means the automatic shutdown of the reactor power system for the reporting period divided by ';he numbe by a rapid insertion of negative reactivity (e.g., by of hours in the reporting period multiplied by the number of control rods, liquid injection system, etc.) that is trains in the emergency AC power system.( Page 14 )
caused by actuation of the reactor protection system.
The signal may have resulted from exceeding a set pointor spurious.
3)
Automatic means that the initial signal that caused actuation of the reactor protection system logic was provided from one of the sensor's monitoring plant parameters and conditions, rather than the manual scram switches or, manual turbine trip switches (or push-buttons) provided in the main control room.
51
1 l
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS & SEP INDEX THERMAL PERF,ORMANCE COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE i
The ratio of the design gross heat rate (corrected) to the Collective radiation exposure is the total extemal whole-body adjusted actual gross heat rate, expressed as a percentage.
dose received by all on-site personnel (including e( Page 15 )
contractors and visitors) during a time period, as measured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). Collective radiation
, FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR exposure is reported in units of person-rem. This indicator tracks radiological work performance for SEP #54.
This indicator is defined as the steady-state primary coolant I-( Page 18 )
-l 131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contribution and normalized to a common purification rate. Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposited on reactor core intemals from INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT RATE previous defective fuel or is present on the surface of fuel elements from the manufacturing process. Steady state is The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in defined as continuous operation for at least three days at a improving industrial safety performance for utility personnel power level that does not vary more than + or -5%. Plants permanently assigned to the station. Contractor work-hours should collect data for (his indicator at a power level above are not included in this indicator. (Page 19 )
85%, when possible. Plants that did not operate at steady-Failure Cause Categories are:
stato power above 85% should collect data for this indicator at the highest steady-state power level attained during the month.
VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The density correction factor is the ratio of the specific volume This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid of ccolant at the RCS operating temperature (540 degrees F.,
radioactive waste actually shipped for burial. This indicator j
Vf a 0.0217) divlOd by the specific volume of coolant at also shows the volume of low-level radioactive waste which is normal letdown temperature (120' F at outlet of the letdown in temporary storage, the amount of radioactive oil that has cooling heat exchanger, Vf = 0.0163), which results in a been shipped off-site for processing, and the volume of solid density correction factor for FCS equal to 1.33.
dry radioactive waste which has been shipped off-site for l
( Page 16 )
processing. Low-level solid radioactive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms
)
generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and q
SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE maintenance. Dry radioactive waste includes contaminated INDEX rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of at The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) is a calculation a low-level radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, based on the concentration of key impurities in the secondary sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all j
side of the plant. These key impurities are the most likely radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of cause of deterioration of the steam generators. Criteria for spent fuel processing. This indicator tracks radiological work
)
calculating the CPI are:
performanco for SEP #54. ( Page 20 )
- 1) The plant is at greater than 30 percent power; and i
- 2) the power is changing loss than 5% per day.
The CPI is calculated using the following equation:
CPI = ((sodium /0.79) + (Chloride /1.52) + (Sulfate /1.44) +
(Iron /3.30) + (Copper /0.30)+(Condensate 02/2.90))/6 Wher3: Sodium, sulfate, chloride and condensate dissolved cxygen a e the monthly average blowdown concentrations in a
ppb, iron and copper are monthly time weighted average feedwater concentrations in ppb. The denominator for eaof the five factors is the INPO median value. If the monthly cverage for a specific parameter is less than the INPO median value, the median value is used in the calculation.
( Page 17 )
f 52
l PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS & SEP INDEX l
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE f
DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE BREAKDOWN l
(LOSS TIME ACCIDENT RATE)
This indicator shows the number and root cause code for This indicator is defined as the number of accidents for all Licensee Event Reports. The root cause codes are as utility personnel permanently assigned to the station, involving follows:
days away from work per 200,000 man-hours worked (100 man-years). This does not include contractor personnel. This 1)
Administrative Control Problem -
indicator tracks personnel performance for SEP #25,26 & 27.
Management and supervisory deficiencies thi (Page 22 )
affect plant programs or activities (i.e., poor planning, breakdown orlack of adequate management or supervisory control, incorrect RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY procedures, etc).
RATE 2)
Licensed Operator Error - This cause code The number of injuries requiring more than normal first aid per captures errors of omission / commission by 200,000 man-hours worked This indicator trends personnel licensed reactor operators during plant activiti performance for SEP #15,25 and 26.
l
( Page 23 )
3)
Other Personnel Error-Errors of omission / commission committed by non-licensed personnel involved in plant activitiea CLEAN CONTROLLED AREA CONTAMINATIONS 21,000 DISBNTEGRATIONS/ MINUTE PER PROBE AREA 4)
Maintenance Problem - The intent of this cal code is to capture the full range of problems s
The personnel contaminatierrevt -
the clean controlled which can be attributed in any way to area. This indicator tracks pe'VM,.,
Mormance for SEP programmatic deficiencies in the maintenance
- 15 & 54. ( Page 24 )
functional organization. Activ60s included in this category are maintenance, testing, surveillance, calibration and radiation protecti PREVENTABLE / PERSONNEL ERROR LERs 5)
Design / Construction / Installation /Fabricatic This indicator is a breakdown of LERs. For purposes of LER event Problem This cause code covers a full rang l
classification, a " Preventable LER* is defined as:
of programmatic deficiencies in the areas of design, construction, installation, and fabricatl An event for which the root cause is personnel error (i.e.,
(i.e., loss of Control power due to underrated inappropriate action by one or more individuals), inadequate fuse, equipment not qualified ror the administrative controls, a design construction, installation, environment, etc.).
Installation, fabrication problem (involving work completed by or supervised by OPPD personnel) or a maintenance problem 6)
Equipment Failures (Electronic Piece-Parts (attributed to inadequate or improper upkeep / repair of plant or Environmental-Related Failures)- This l
equipment). Also, the cause of the event must have occurred code is used for spurious failures of electronic within approximately two years of the " Event Date" spedfied in the piece-parts and failures due to meteorologica LER (e.g., an event for which the cause is attrity;ted to a problem conditions such as lightning, ice, high winds, <
with the original design of the plant would not be considered Generally, it includes spurious or one-time preventable).
failures. Electric components included in thie category are circuit cards, rectifiers, bistablec For purposes of LER event classification, a
- Personnel Error" LER is fuses, capacitors, diodes, resistors, etc.
defined as follows:
In addition this indicator reports SEP # 60 &
- 61. (Page 26 )
An event for which the root cause is inappropnate action on the part I
of one or more individuals (as opposed to being attributed to a l
department or a general group). Also, the inappropriate action must have occurred within approximately two years of the Event Date" specified in the LER. Additionally, each event classified o
as a " Personnel Error" should also be classified as
" Preventable." This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP ltem #15. ( Page 25 )
53 L
l
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS & SEP INDEX VIOLATION TREND This indicator tracks maintenance performance for SEP
- 36. ( Page 31 )
.This indicator is defined as Fort Calhoun Station Cited Violations and
, Non Cited Violations trended over 12 months. Additionally, Cited RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE &
Violations for the top quartile Region IV plant is trended over 12 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE
. months (lagging the Fort Elhoun Station trend by 2-3 months). It is the Fort Calhoun Station Doal to be at or below the cited violation The rntio of preventive maintenance (including surveillance trend for the top quartile Region IV plant. ( Page 27 )
testing and calibration procedcres) to the sum of non-outage corrective maintenance and preventive maintenance CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR completed over the reporting period. The ratio, expressed as a percentage,is calculated based on man-hours. Also The purpose of this indicator is to quantify the economical displayed are the percent of preventive maintenance items in operation of Fort Calhoun Station. The cents per kilowatt hour the month that were not completed or administratively closed indicator represents the budget and actual cents per kilowatt by the scheduled date plus a grace period equal to 25% of the hour on a twelve-month everage for the current year. The scheduled interval. This indicator tracks preventive basis for the budget curve is the approved yearly budget. The maintenance activities for SEP #41 ( Page 32 )
basis for the actual curve is the financial and Operating Report. ( Page 29 )
PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)
MAINTENANCE WORKLOAD BACKLOGS The number of identified incidents conceming maintenance This indicator shows the backlog of non-outage Maintenance procedural problems, the number of closed irs related to the Work Documents remaining open at t!'e end of the reporting use of procedures (includes the number of closed irs caused month. Maintenance classifications are defined as follows:
by procedural noncompliance), and the number of closed procedural noncompliance irs. This indicator trends Corrective - Repair and restoration of equipment or personnel performance for SEP #15,41 and 44. ( Page 33 )
components that have failed or are malfunctioning and are not performing their intended function, s
CONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA Preventive Actions taken to maintain a piece of equipment within design operating conditions, prevent The percentage of the Radiation Controlled Area, which equipment failure, and extend its life and are performed includes the auxiliary building, the radwaste building, and prior to equipment failure.
areas of the C/RP building, that is contaminated based on the total square footage. This indicator tracks performance for f 6n. Corrective / Plant improvements - Maintenance SEP #54. ( Page 34 )
activities performed to implement station improvements or tJ repair non-plant equipment.
RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM Maintenance Work Priorities are defined as:
The number of identified poor radiological work practict.s Emergency - Conditions which significantly degrade station (PRWPs) for the reporting month. This indicator tracic safety or availability.
radiological work performance for SEP #52. ( Page 35 )
immediate Action - Equipment deficiencies which signGantly degrade station reliability. Potential for unit DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL) shutdown or power reduction.
The Document Review Indicator shows the number of Operations Concern - Equipment deficiencies which documents reviewed, the number of documents scheduled for hinder station operation, review, and the number of document reviews that are overdue for the reporting month. A document review is considered Essential-Routine corrective maintenance on essantial overdue if the review is not complete within six s
station systems and equipment.
months of the assigned due date. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #46. ( Page 36 )
Non-Essential-Routine corrective maintenanor on non-essential station systems and equipment.
Plant Improvement - Non-corrective maintenance and plant improvements.
54
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS & SEP INDEX LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)
Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineering, and Maintrance. The graphs provide data on ECN Facility The total number of security incidents for the reporting month Changes open, ECN Substitute Replacement items open, depicted in two graphs. This indicator tracks security ECN Document Uhanges open. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #58. ( Page 37 )
performance for SEP #62. ( Page 41 )
t TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING The number of temporary mechanical and electrical The total number of hours of training given to each crew configurations to the plant's systems, during each cycle. Also provided are the simulator training hours (which are a subset of the total training hours). the 1)
Temporary configurations are defined as number of non-REQUALIFICATION training hours and the electrical jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical number of exam failures. This indicator tracks training jumpers, or mechanical blocks which are perfomece for SEP # 68. ( Page 42 )
installed in the plad operating systems and are not shown on the latest revision of the P&lD, schematic, connection, wiring, or flow diagrams.
UCENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS 2)
Jumpers and blocks which are installed for This indicator shows the number of SRO and/or RO quizze Surveilience Tests, Maintenance Procedures, and exams that are administered and passed each month.
Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures or This indicator tracks training performance for SEP #68.
Operating Procedures are not considered as
( Page 43 )
temporary modifications unless the jumper or block remains in place after the test or procedure is complete. Jumpers and blocks MWD PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 18 REFUELING installed in test 3r lab instruments are not OUTAGE) considered as temporary modifications.
This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work 3)
Scaffold is not considered a temporary Requests (MWRs) and Maintenance Work Documents modification. Jumpers and blocks which are (MWDs) that have been approved for inclusion in the Cycle installed and for which Mrs have been submitted Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance #31 will be considered as temporary modifications
( Page 44) until final resolution of the MR and the jumper or block is removed or is permanently recorded on the drawings. This SPECIALSERVICES L 31NEERING 1998 OUTAGE indicator tracks temporary modifications for PROJECTS STATUS RsPORT SEP #62 and 71. ( Page 38 )
This indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31.
( Page 45)
ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR)
BREAKDOWN PROGRESS OF 1998 REFUELING OUTAGE MODIFICATIONS CYCLE 18 This indicator shoe a breakdown, by age and priority of the EAR, of the number of EARS assigned to Design Engineering This indicator shows the status of Modifications approved f Nuclear and System Engineering. This indicator tracks installation during the Cycle 18 Refueling Outage performance for SEP #62. ( Page 39 )
( March 1998). This indicator tracks performance for SEP
- 31. ( Page 46 )
l ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS The number of ECNs that were opened, ECNs that were completed, and open backlog ECNs awaiting completion by DEN for the reporting month. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #62. ( Page 40 )
ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICES OPEN This indicator breaks down the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) that are assigned to Design 55
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS & SEP INDEX PROGRESS OF CYCLE 18 OUTAGE MODS AND ECN'S ADDED'TO '98 REFUELING OUTAGE AFTER FREEZE DATE f-This indicator will show the status of Modifications and ECN's approved for installation during the Cycle 18 2 Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #33.
( Page 47 )
1 Progress of 1997 On-Line modification Planning This indicator shows the status of rnodifications apprcved or in review for approval for on-line installation during 1997. This indicator tracks perforrnance for SEP # 31. ( Page 48 )
9 d
E 9
W 56 F
SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators Index is to list performance indicators related to SEP items with parameters that can be trended.
SEP Reference Number 15
. Increase HPES gd IR Accountability through use of Performance Indicators Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance).
Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate Clean Controlled Area Contaminations >1,000 Disintegrations / Minute Per Probe Area Preventable / Personnel Error LERs SEP Reference Numbers 25. 26. & 27
. Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented
. Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements implement Supervisory Enforcement of Industrial Safety Standards e
Disabling injury / Illness Frequency Rate.......
Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequenc'/ Rate SEP Reference NumberJ1
. Develop Outage and Malatenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWD Planning Status (Cycle 18 Refueling Outage)
Component Testing Department, Special Services Engineering Department 1998 Outage Projects..
Progress of 1998 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 18 Progress of 1997 On-Line Modi'ication Planning SEP Reference Number 33
. Develop On-Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule Progress of Cycle 18 Outage MODS and ECN's Added to '98 Refueling Outage After Freeze Date SEP Reference Number 36
. Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Workload Backlogs (Corrective Non-Outage)
SEP Reference Numbers 41 & 44
. Develop and Implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule
. Compliance With ar,d Use of Procedures Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance & Preventive Meintenance items Overdue....
Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) hff. Reference Number 46 Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program e
Document Review 57
SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX SEP Reference Number 52 Page
- Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices d
Radiological Work Practices Program............
35 SER. Reference Number 54
- Complete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Collective Radiation Exposure................................................
18 Volume of Low-Leve! Solid Radioactive Waste 20 Clean Controlled Area Disintegrations 21,000 Counts / Minute Per Probe Area......
24 Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area..........
34 SEP Reference Number 58
= Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security)...................
37 SEP Reference Numbers 60 & 61 e improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program e Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests licensee Report LER Root Cause Breakdown Number of Missed Surveillance Tests r esulting in Licensee Event Reports 26 SEP Reference Number 62
. Ectablish Interim System Engineers Temporary Modifications..............
38 Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown...................................
26 Engineering Change Notice Status 40 Engineering Change Notices Open.........................
41 SEP Reference Number 68 e Acsess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and establish means to monitor Operator Training License Operator Requalification Training..
42 License Candidate Exams.......
43 SEP Reference Number 71 Improve Controls over Temporary Modifications Terrporary Modifications.
38 58
REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST K. L. Belek J.W. Johnson G.C. Bishor' D.D. Kloock C. E Boug'1ter J. B. Kuhr (9 Copies)
C. J. Brunr,9rt L.T.Kusek J. W. Chasa C. J. Linden (10 Copies)
R. G. Conner S. A. Lindquist M.R. Core B. R Livingston T. R. Dukarski E. R. Lounsberry M. L. Elus T. J. Mcivor R. P. Clemens K. A. Miller S. K. Gambhir R. J. Mueller J. K. Gasper R. L. Phelps w.G. Gates R. L. Plott S. W. Gebers W. J. Por.uc M. J. Guinn D. G. Ried R. H. Guy M. J. Sandhoefner A. L. Hale F. C. Scofield B. R. Hansher H. J. Eefick R. K. Hamilton R. W Short K. R. Henry R. D. Spies (2 Copies)
J. B. Herman K. E. Steele R. P. Hodgson D. E. Spires C.K. Huang M. A. Tesar J. K. Kellams J. J. Tesarek R. L. Jaworski J. W. Tills f
D. R. Trausch
[
L. P. Walling G. R. Williar #
C 59
. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _