ML20236U660

Performance Indicators for June 1998

ML20236U660
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	06/30/1998
From:	OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:
Shared Package
ML20236U655	List: LIC-98-0100, Forwards Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators for June 1998 ML20236U660
References
NUDOCS 9807300366
Download: ML20236U660 (65)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ ~ . . - _ - - - -

0 I ~

g OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT l FORT CALHOUN STATION i

.- ) 1

,j'- .

. . '% ; , . . -+

,.1 ?Y.

-h i' , d o .m}Y .

• ' . . . . ..; _L

• ^

"*)l.

l

' =  ;

(:. ,.

. m.O .. w

,m -

., , ,. , , , , - ,wt. -

, .t

' ' ,[ , ,

I

!l k 4., y g -

g.mt i,t. . . ed : * -

• J' ~

g,. ,77 " ' -l ; } 'i. , r -

g. . . . ,

.+.3 -p.,' *

+. r.? '- 'I. . . , ,

Av .,.

I kg

...r , . p.' g.. /* ,, .,: .,. ,0  ;.,g .,8,,

[ ;*_ . .__r.. , -. _ _. ._. . , ' . , , .

. .- } "

4 :e.a ;',:,;.t '. * - ,.

6 b,. n,. . , . ' . lQ

,.c . . . ; _ _ 9_ _ ,

, , e; -

' : '- . , . , ' , , ' ,.' [-_ ' , - _,

, y h' ', ,,a l I PERFORMANCE INDICATORS JUNE 1998 SAFE OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE COST EFFECTIVENESS 9807300366 900722 PDR ADOCK 05000285 p PDR

Table of Contents / Summary TABLE OF CONTENTS /

SUMMARY

em

.1 MONTHLY SUMM ARY REPORT ,

.4 WANO PERFORMA.NCE INDEX 1 REND .5 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX INDICATOR .6 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT

SUMMARY

. .7 INPO NOTEWORTHY / SIGNIFICANT EVENTS .8 WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Unit Capability Factor .10 Unplanned Capability Loss Factor .11 Unplanned Automatic Reactor SCRAMS per 7000 Hours . . . .12 High Pressure Safety injection System . . . .13 Auxiliary Feedwater System .. .14 Emergency AC Power System . .

.15 Thermal Performance .16 Fuel Rel; ability Indicator .17 Secondary System Chemistry . .18 Collective Radiation Exposure .19 Industrial Safety Accident and Disabling injury / illness Rate .20 Volume of Low Level Radioactive Waste . .

. 21 SAFE OPERATIONS Error Rate . . .23 Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate , . .24 Clean Controlled Area Contaminations

>1,000 Disintegrations / Minute per Probe Area .25 1

I Table of Contents / Summary Preventable / Personnel Error LERs .26 Licensee Event Report (LER) Root Cause Breakdown .27 i

Violation Trend .

.28

COSI Cents Per Kilowatt Hour .30 DMSION AND DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Maintenance E

g Workload Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage) .32 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance .33 Procedural Noncompliance Incidents . . .34 Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area . .35 Radiological Work Practices Program . . . 36 E Document Review .. .37 Security Incidents .

. .38 Temporary Modifications . .

. 39 Outstanding Modifications . .40 Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown . .41 Engineering Change Notices Status part 1 .42 Status part 2 '

.43 I Open part 1 Open part 2

. . .44

.45 Maintenance Rule SSC Unavailability . 46 Maintenance Rule SSC Reliability . 47 Licensed Operator Requalification Training .48 License Candidate Exams .49 I Cycle 19 Refueling Outage MWD Planning Status . .. .

Component Testing Department, Special Services Engineering Department 1998 Outage

.50 51 I Progress of 1999 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 19 .52 Progress of Cycle 19 Outage MODS and ECte Added to 1999 Refueling Outage After Freeze 53 I

2

Table of Contents / Summary f Progress of 1998 On-Line Modification Planning .54 l ACTION PLANS. DEFINITIONS. SEP INDEX Action Plans ..

.56 Performance Indicator Definitions . . 57 Safety Enhancement Program Index . .

.62 Current Production and Operations " Records"/ Station Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates 64 3

FORT CALHOUN STATION Monthly Summary OPERATIONS Tbs Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) was shutdown for the 1998 Refueling and Maintenance Outage until June 3,1998 at 2210 hours0.0256 days <br />0.614 hours <br />0.00365 weeks <br />8.40905e-4 months <br /> when the reactor was declared critical. Low power physics testing was then completed and FCS reached Mode 1 on June 4,1998 at 1246 hours0.0144 days <br />0.346 hours <br />0.00206 weeks <br />4.74103e-4 months <br />. The generator was placed in service en June 4,1998 at 2312 hours0.0268 days <br />0.642 hours <br />0.00382 weeks <br />8.79716e-4 months <br />. On June 5,1998 at 1610 hours0.0186 days <br />0.447 hours <br />0.00266 weeks <br />6.12605e-4 months <br />, the generator was taken off-line to complete turbine overspeed testing. Testing was completed satisfactorily and the generator was placed back in service on June 5,1998 at 1912 hours0.0221 days <br />0.531 hours <br />0.00316 weeks <br />7.27516e-4 months <br />. FCS reached 100% power on June 11,1998 and remained here through the end of the month.

WANO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Tbs overall WANO Performance Inde::wia 84% during the 2nd Quarter of 1998. Signi3 cant percentage point losses are attributed to the following WANO Performance Indicators listed below:

1. The Unit Capability Factorindicator, Mculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 5.4 point loss as a result of unplanned energy losses defined on page 10.

2. The Unplanned Capability Loss Factor Indicator calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 6.5 point loss as a resuit of unplanned energy losses defined on pages 10 and 11.

3. The ThermalPerformance Indicator, calculated over the previous 12 months, contribut3d to a 0.3 point loss due to thermal energy losses experienced during reactor power changes and forced outages defined on pages 10 and 16.

4. The Collective Radiation Exposure Indicator, calculated over the previous 24 months, ,

contributed to a 2.4 point loss, which was attributed to fuel failures and recent high exposure jobs during the refueling outage on page 19.  ;

5. The Emergency AC Powerindicator, calculated over the previous 24 months, contributed to a 0.6 point loss, which was a result of on-line maintenance, and replacement of relavs under ECN95-347,

• Replace Relays for Seismic Adequacy" on page 15.

6. The Chemistry Performance index Indicator, calculated over the previous 12 moaths, contributed to a 1.0 point loss, which is due to copper tubes in heat exchangers and mechanical shock to systems in the past year from forced outages defined on page 18.

1 i

4

l 1

C Fort Calhoun index value

-*- WANo Median Index Value FCS GOAL 90%

v 1.0 --

88.9 --

86.8 --

84.7 --

82.6 --

O'

> 8 0.5 -- sg f 78.4 --

c.-s get .ry e_n.

18 0.0. MI n

76.3 -- g4 39 'g m%: 3(7 74.2 -- fSb-w h

.~ x' .-

hy

%b;p.

q&y 72.1 -- ,4 #  :;g " , ;a

" ""' ~~

70.0 l l

97/3 97/4 98/1 98/2 WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX TREND The Wano Performance Index Trend calculation is made up of eleven variables, each value is weighted to arrive at an overall index value. WANO calculates the performance Index value based on the industry reporting the information each quarter. The variables are calculated over a defined period of time as listed below.

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR WEIGHTED FACTOR TIME I

Unit Capability Factor 16 24 Months i Unplanned Capability Loss Factor 12 24 Months High Pressure Safety injection 10 24 Months Auxiliary Feedwater 10 24 Months Emergency AC Power 10 24 Months Unplanned Auto Scrams /7000 Hours 8 24 Months Collective Radiation Exposure 8 24 Months Thermal Performance Indicator 6 12 Months Secondary Chemistry Indicator 7 12 Months Industrial Safety Accident Rate 5 12 Months Fuel Reliability Indicator 8 Quarterly 5

18.00 - 8 16.00 - o M M AM M V A W E E Rs@ M g h6 S8 14.00 - 8 I

12.m .

8U g ooo ooo o i ggg ggg g,,

~~~ ~~~

10.00 - "dd g ggg g- go 8N- w8 www 80 8 W se s go e 6.00 - 8 2

0.00 - 1 I l- -i l-l l I 1 I -i UCF UCLF HPSI AFW EACP CRE UA7 FRI CPI TPI ISAR WANO PERFORMANCE INDEX INDICATORS This graph sfiows the dfference between First Qtr '98 and Second Qtr '98 actual values achieved by Fort Calhoun.

CALCULATED OVER A 24 MONTH PERIOD MAXIMUM VALUE TREND UCF Unit Capability Factor 16 Decrease UCLF Unplanned Capability Loss Factor 12 Decrease HPSI High Pressure Safety injection 10 No Change AFW Auxiliary Feedwater 10 No Change EACP Emergency AC Power 10 No Change UA7 Unplanned Auto Scrams / 7000 Hours 10 No Change CRE Collective Radiation Exposure 8 Decrease CALCULATED OVER A 12 MONTH PERIOD TPI Thermal Performance indicator 6 No Change CPI Secondary Chemistry indicator 7 increase ISAR Industrial Safety Accident Rate 5 No Change CALCULATFD OVER A QUARTERLY PERIOD FRI Fuel Reliability Indicator 8 increase n

6

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

SUMMARY

REPORT POSITIVE TREND REPORT ADVERSE TREND REPORT A performance indicator with data representing three consecutive A performance indicator with data representing three i months of improving performance or three consecutive months of ansecutive months of dechnir:g performance of three consecutive per'ormance that is supenor to the stated goalis exhibiting a positive months of performan that is trending toward d6 dining as determined trend per Nuclear Operations Division Quality Procedure 37 (NOD- by the Manager Nuclear Licensing. constitutes an adverse trend per QP-37). The following performance indicators exhibited pos".<e Nuclear Operations Division Quality Procedure 37 (NOD-OP-37) A trerds for the reporting month: supervisor whose performance indicator exhibits an adverse trend by the definition may specify in wntten form (to be pubhshed in the Unolanned Autornate Reador Scrams report) why the trend is not adverse.The following performance (Page 12) indicators exhibited adverse trends for the reporting month.

Hiah Pressure Safety Iniection System Safety System Performance (Page 13) h Aux Feed Water System Safety System Perfom ance INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT (Page 14) ATTENTION REPORT Emeraency AC Power System Safety Performance A performance indicator with data for the reporting penod that is (Page 15) inadequate when compared to the OPPD goal is defined as Needing increased Management Attention *per (NOD-QP-37).

Thermal Performance (Page 16) Clean Controlled Area Contaminations (Page 25)

Contaminated Radiaton Controlled Area Matntenan Workload Backloc (Page 32)

(Page 35)

Temoorarv Modifications (Page 3g) 7

m Significant O Noteworthy 16 - 14 14 - -

12 - g 10 - 7 7 8-6- r 4 l 4- 3l 3 2

3 2- 0 0 0 , , , . , ,

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 INPO NOTEWORTHY / SIGNIFICANT EVENTS  ;

Not3 worthy /Significant events at FCS are classified by INPO to identify precursors to events.

Thsre were O Noteworthy and 0 Significant Events during the month of June 1998.

Significant Events for June 1998:

None Noteworthy Events since Start of INPO Cycle:

• Containment Hydrogen Panel Components Exceed Qualified Life Due to incorrect Calculation Assumptions

= Transformer Fault and Loss of Off-Site Power While Shutdown Due to inadvertent ,

Actuation of Transformer Deluge System

. Degraded Steam Generator Tube Left in Service Due to Personnel Error

• Reactor Coolant Pump Cavitation During Planned Pressure Reduction D:ta Source: Tills /Guinn (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Tills /Guinn Trsnd: None 8

l 1

WANO l PERFORMANCE INDICATORS l

l l

1 9

i i Monthly Unit Capability Factor-e.- 24 Month Unit Capability Factor 120.0% $

gg$ g g $$$

g g g

$$g $$$

g g g $$g gg ,

,, gg 100.0 % - E $ E2 2 2 g **2 Sg2 2 3iE28- -

d 80.0% -

~

N._ _ _

r k._ - -.

b "

e 60.0% -

3,,, apo 40.0% -

20.0% - $& gg i 0.0%

%%%%4555 5%%5%%5%%%5558 %%

E?$8EEN$EkEAE?E8EEN&E$EN l

UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR UCF is defined as the ratio of the available energy generation over a given period of time to the reference energy g;n: ration over the same time period, expressed as a percentage. The FCS Goal for the indicator is (87.5%) and th3 WANO Median is (81.9%).

UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR AVERAGES Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 60.0% 88.8 % 73.0 % 80.3%

Enerav Losses:

Forced Outage-Condenser circulating valve repairs and leakage on Condenser "B" Evrnt Period: September 10, thru13,1997. j l Power Reduction- Faculty Manual Transfer switch on instrument inverter "A" Ev:nt Period: August 26,28,1997.

Forced Outage- Circumferential cracking of a weld down stream of a moisture separator due to high system strcsses Event Period: May 28, thru May 29,1997.

Forced Outage- Steam leak in the fourth stage extraction steam system Evsnt Period: April through mid May 1997.

A 24 mor.th calculation of the WANO UCF indicataor was 10.6 points out of 16 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 10.6 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 13.6.

Datn Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Chase '

Tr:nd: None 10

c- 2 M onthly unplanned Capability Loss Factor -e- 24 Month Rollirig Average Fort Calhoun Goal (3.5% ) --*-- WA N O Industry Median (2.2% )

60.00% -

I g

50.00% - n p

h 40.00% - d l 30.00% - -

3,,,,,,

~

' 0,2 0  !! n!  !! ! !/ -

4!L . l! !!!!! !

=____--_ V.}

~

r:ic Li : - -

4 5 {4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 % 2 544 4 4 8 5 4 5 AEE8EE$bEEEkA E$5EEN$$kEk UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Unplanned Capability Loss Factor (UCLF), a rolling 12-month average, the OPPD goal, and the WANO Industry Median. UCLF is defined as the ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a given period of time, to the reference energy generation expressed as a percentage. Unplanned energy loss is defined as energy not produced as a result of unscheduled shutdowns, outage extensions, or load reductions due to causes under plant management control. Energy losses are considered to be unplanned if they are not scheduled at least four weeks in advance.

UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR AVERAGES-Year to Date 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 7.73 % 7.12% 8.15% 7.7%

A 24 month ca:culation of the WANO UCLF indicataor was 5.50 points out of 16 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 6.50 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 5.60.

Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Chase Trend: None 11

0 12-Month Rolling Average

--+-- FCS Reactor Scrams Per 7,000 Hours Critical for last 36 months Fort Calhoun Goal (0.0)

-e- WANO Industry Median (0)

-m-- FCS Reactor Scrams -1997-98 2 --

8 1--

1998 O= = = = = = = = = = = =

July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS PER 7000 HOURS CRITICAL The graph shows the 12-month rolling average, the 36-month average, the OPPD goal for 1998 and the WANO Industry Median. Also the graph shows the number of Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams that occurred during the last 12 months. There were no Unplanned Automatic Reactos during the month of June 1990. The 12-month rolling average (July 1997 through June 1998) was 0. An unplanned automatic reactor SCRAM occurred in August 1995; therefore, the 36-month value (July 1995 through June 1998) was 0.293.

A 24 month calculation of the WANO UA7 indicataor was 8.0 points out of 8 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 8.0 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 8.0.

Data Source: Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability: Chase Trend: Positive

)

12 i

i i Monthly HPSI System Unavailability Value

-*-- 12 Month Rolling Average Fort Calhoun Goal (0.003)

-e- WANO Industry Median (0.002) 0.02 --

0.015 --

0.01 --

0.005 -- 1998 RFO 0 1 l 1 i l 1 l 1 1 i l 1 l 1 l 1 , i l l l Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the High Pressure Safety injection (HPSI) System unavailability value, as defined by WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for June 1998.

The HPSI System unavailability value for the month of June 1998 was 0.0. There were 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of planned unavailability, and 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of unplanned unavailability. The 12 month rolling average was (July 1997 through June 1998) was 0.00, and the year-to-date HPSI unavailability value was0.00 at the end of the month. For the previous year there was a total of 9.8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> of planned unavailability and 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of unplanned unavailability for the HPSI system.

A 24 month calculation of the WANO HPSI indicataor was 10.0 points out of 10 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 10.0 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 10.0 Data Source: Phelps/Schaffer (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Schaffer Trend: Positive 13

I

-o-12 Month AFW Unavailability Fort Calhoun Goal (0.01)

_ _ _ _ WANO Industry Median (0.001) 1 0.025 --

0.02 -

)

0.015 -

0.009 0.01 --

0.002 0.005 mpg

,o__ e _ 1_ e_.a, s_ __1___9___p___p___y __y _

o,[f[ OD -e -#

July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE

! This indicator shows the Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) System Unavailability value, as defined by l WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the month of June 1998.

i I The AFW System Unavailability Value for June 1998 was 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />. There were 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of plcnned and 0.0 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of Unplanned Train Unavailability hours during the month. The 12 month rolling average (July 1997 through June 1998) was 0.0023 and the year-to-date unavailability value was 0.te?13 at the and of June 1998. ,

l A 24 month calculation of the WANO AFW indicator was 10.0 points out of 10 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 10.0 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 10.0.

Drta Source: Phelps/Fritts (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Fritts Trend: Postive 14

Monthly Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value

-m- Year-to-Date Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value Fort Calhoun Goal (0.024)

--*- WANO Industry Median (0.005) 0.03 -

0.025 -

2 0.02 - o m o 2 H+i kJ 0 , , , , , , , , ,

8 s ,E t a a & ,5 4 F e t E g g u. :s < :s < w o z $

EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE j This indicator shows the Emergency AC Power System unavailability value, as defined by WANO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the month of June 1998.

]

The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value for June 1998 was 0.017. The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value year-to-oate was 0.008 and the value for the l last 12 months (July 1997 through June 1998) was 0.013.

Monthly Statist [c1 l

Planned Ur.availabilltv: DG-1: 15.3 DG-2: 9.7 Total: 0.0 YTD: 25.0 Hours Unnlanned Unavailability: DG-1: 0.0 DG-2: 0.0 Total: 0.0 YTO: 00.0 Hours A 24 month calculation of the WANO EACP indicator was 9.4 points out of 10 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 9.4 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 9.4.

Data Source: Phelps/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Ronning Trend: Positive 15

9 f

f Monthly Thermal Performance i i i 12-Month Rolling Average f

Fort Calhoun Goal (9P.7%)

-er-- WANO Industry Median (99.1%)

=8 as 8

] [

o o

a o

a o o

a 1888 RFO 8

8 100% - 5 E 'S $ $ "

E I W L- E ' W ~~ Y M-E 99% --

I II I. I B 1

I B I ;

1 I.

f l s l'  !

98 % l -+ + l ' + i + , , , H July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June THERMAL PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the monthly Thermal Perfonnance Value, the rolling 12-month average, l

ths OPPD goal, and the WANO Industry fAedian.

The thermal performance value for tha month of June was 100.0%. The year to date value was l

reported as 99.9%. The 12 month rolkng average (July 1997 through June 1998) was reported es 99.9%.

l Note: Our Best Achievable Gross Heat Rate improved by 4% this month (it is now 63 BTU /kwh better than design.), Primarily this is attributable to the new High Pressure Turbine l diaphragms that were installed curing the 1998 refueling outage.

I  :

Ths 1998 Fort Calhoun year-end goal for this indicator is an inde.v v2'ue which is > 99.7%. The J

A 12 month calculation of the WANO TPI indicator 99.1%.

The 12 month calculation of the WANO TPl indicator was 5.7 points out of 6 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.7 which compares to the First Quarter 1993 value of 5.7.

)

1 l

l Data Source: Phelps/Naser(Manager / Source) l Accountability: Phelps/Naser Trcnd: Positive l l 16

m Fuel Reliability (E-04 Microcuries/ Gram)

-e- WANO Industry Median (2-1E-05Microcurles/Gra m)

A End of 1998 Goal (17.3 E-04 Microcuries/ Gram) 236 250 E I. 214

$ 200 -- )

3 <

E 150 - 131 i S

E o 100 --

5 1998 RFO

• f>0 --

9 0 0 0 -- , , ,

2 .

2 , ,

2 ,

2 ,

2 2 2 ,

b Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The r,1onthly Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) for June 1998 was 1.8 E-04 microcuries/ gram was bar.ec on steady state data at 100% power this is a conservative value, since the plant came on-line on June 4th and the coolant activity is not at equilibrium. The purpose of the FRI is to monitor industry progress in achieving and maintaining a high level of fuelintegrity. An offec+,ve fuelintegrity and performance monitoring program provides a means to detect fuel failures aid assess the fuel failure number, physical condition, exposure, mechanism, and location.

The Quarterly et!culation of the WANO FRl indicator was 8.0 points out of 8 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1198 the FCS Value was 8.0 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 0.0.

l Data Source: G Jinn /Roenigk (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase /Stafford

".' rend: None 17

C Monthly Chemistry Indicator 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (1.1)

--m-WANO Industry Median (1.04) 3 --

2.5 . 2A3 I

2-- K h

i 1.5 -- y 1.32 , 36 1.1 1. 1 1.11 (L

-  ; ,y

,_ y = -

_ 2 - -

1998 0.5 -- 4 g( jIj[  % { E y RFO

& %p L -

[

R y( '

4 p

1. "4 31; 7 .,. c y }y, g 0 l  :

July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY St:ady state plant conditons required for calculating the Seccndary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) for plant performance fouowing Refueling Outage that ended on June 3.

The CPI for June 1968 is 1.36, this was higher than normal for steady state operations due to restoring tha plant operations. The CPI value for the past 12 months (July 1997 through June 1998) was 1.32.

The CPI value in the industry's upper quartile is 1.17. Six parameters are used in the CPI calculation.

Four of the parameters were below the WANO mean value which are as follows: 1) steam generator chloride,2) sulfate,3) feedwater iron, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen. Increase in CPI observed this month due to power ascention from refueling outage. This is an expected condition.

The 12 month calculation of the WANO CPI Indicator was 7.0 points out of 7 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 7.0 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 5.60 Data Source: Hamilton /Ostien (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Hamilton Trend: None i

1 i

18

CRE Pe r sonnei Based on TLD QTRS m M%RmbRafhEgatagD)

FCS Goa1224 REM - METULleBBdmEDMg E 2D~

8 n

225- 2D~ S 200- 3 175- g.,

150 -

125- m 100 - G" 6 75 - co

• 8 E . o O M i I i

' O 0

O-"' '

an re ur yuv an .u Ag Sp Q1 % Oc j COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE The 1998 goal for Collective Radiation Exposure (CRE) at Fort Calhoun Station was established for a Total Dose of 224.0 person-rem, based on TLD readings. Dose is tracked monthly by obtaining Electronic Dosimeter (ED) readings, until the Quarterly TLD readings are obtained. The exposure for June 1998 was 1.850 Person-rem (ED). The WANO Industry i Median is 127 man-REM per year based on a three year average compared to 139 man-REM l p;r year at FCS. 1 Dose FCS Goal i Person- First Otr. Second Third Qtr. Fourth Qtr.

I Rem Otr.

Total 224.0 15.560 194.111 Person-Rem The 24 month calculation of the WANO CRE Indicator was 4.6 points out of 8 points. At the end of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 4.6 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 7.0 l

Data Source: Chase / Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase /Gebers Trend: None SEP54 19

C""""l1 Monthly Industrial safety Accident & Disabling Injurylltiness Rate

-*-- 12 Month Rolling Average FC5 Year End Goal (<0.40)

--m- WANo Industry Median (0.44) 1-  !

0.9 -

0.8 - ,

0.7 - g 0.6 - """

y g ,

= = = = = =Nx= = --

0.3 - g T -

0.2 - E <

7; h d dNo

~

d d d q q July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT AND DISA9 LING INJURY /lLLNESS (LOST-TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in improving industrial safety performance for utility personnel permanently assigned to the station. Contractor work-hours are not included in the indicator. This indicator is defined as the number of accidents per 200,000 work-hours worked for all utility personnel permanently assigned to the station that result in any of following:

. one or more days of restricted work (excluding the day of the accident.)

One or more days away from work (excluding the day of the accident.)

• Fatalities.

l lSAR = (number of restricted-time accidents + lost-time accidents + fatalities) x 200.000 (number of station person-hours worked)

The Fort Calhoun Station Industrial Safety Accident Rate and Disabling injury / Illness Frequency .

Rate was 0.30 for the month of June 1998. The 12 month rolling average (July 1997 through June 1998) was 0. The year to date value was 1 at the end of June 1998. There was no restricted-time and no lost-time accident in June 1998.

The 12 month calculation of the WANO ISAR Indicator was is 5.0 points out of 5 points. At the end L of the Second Quarter 1998 the FCS Value was 5.0 which compares to the First Quarter 1998 value of 5.0.

l

! Data Source: Sorensen/Blumenthal (Manager / Source)

Chase / Booth (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase /Gebers ,

Trcnd: None SEP 25,26 & 27 l 20

m Monthly Volume of LLRW(cu.ft.)

i Year-to-Date Cumulative Radioactive Waste Buried

-A--WANO Industry Median (54) l 300 8

k l 200 -

i a 8 s a j gg $ 5 5 5 a 00 0 S

100 -

A-----A E

n S 8 e

0 , , i i i i i i- i , , i l Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec l

l l VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE l

l This indicator shows the volume of the monthly Radioactive Waste buried and the cumulative year-to-date radioactive waste buried. The Fort Calhoun goal is 800 cu.ft.

l Ft m8 l

Amount of solid radwaste shipped off-site for processing during current month : 000.0 0.00 l Volume of solid radwaste buried during June 1998 : 105.8 2.99 Cumu!ative volume of solid radioactive waste buried in 1998 : 254.6 7.21 Amount of solid radwaste in temporary storage : 000.0 00.00 The WANO industry Median is 54 cubic meters per year. The industry Best Quartile value is l approximately 26 cubic meters per year. l Data Source: Chase /Breuer (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase /Gebers Trend: None SEP54 l

l 21

SAFE OPERATIONS Goal: A proactive, self-critical and safety conscious culture is exhibited throughout the nuclear organization.

Individuals demonstrate professionalism through self-ownership and personalinitiative and open communication.

1 i

l l

22

l amms Error Rate - FCS Goal -e Rolkng Error Rate l

g. 8 81 8.51 b 8 y 6.67 G

2ps 1

__ _ a

/ / / / /////////

/////////////

Personnel Error Rate The purpose of this indicator is to monitor human error events at FCS which are classified as a Noteworthy Event,'under the criteria specified in the Condition Report Program. Noteworthy events may be classified as level one, two, or three on a Condition Report or as defined but not limited to the examples listed below:

Error Rate = number of human errors x hours everv two weeks 100,000 hrs

1. A recordable injury in industrial safety.

2. Valve Mispostitioning event caused by plant personnel.

3. Equipment tagging error that significantly impacts safe operation of the plant, readiness or personal safety.

4. Improper or failure to use of safety equipment or performing a task in an unsafe manner.

5. Any event involving loss of radioactive material control that may cause or potentially result in an individual to receiving an unauthorized exposure.

6. Any spill or spread of radioactive material, which results in an impact on the plant or the general safety of plant personnel or the general public.

7. Failure to utilize, or adhere tn sound radiation principles, or accepted administrative controls to keep occupational radiation exposure, or exposures to member of public ALARA.

8. Chemistry parameter (s) out of specification. involving insufficient chemistry corrective action or oversight.

9. Violation of procedure or human performance error.

10. Less than 3 deep (qualified members)in minimum staffing position for the Control Room, TSC, OSC, and EOF.

11. Any unplanned impact to offside evacuation routes or relocation capability.

12. Any failure or theft of emergency response equipment or supplies necessary to complete classification, notification, protective action recommendation or ERO command & control functions.

13. Inadequate, training or qualification.

14. Failure to adequately staff the ERO in actual responses or drill notification.

Data Source: Tesar/Burrgraf (Maneger/ Source)

Accountability: Chase /Tesar Trend: None 23

rm Monthly Recordable injury / Illness Rate 1998 F.C.S. Goal (1.5) 2-1.6 -

1.2 -

0.8 - 0.63 7 0.43

^ 0.33 0.4 - -- 0.3

s. h " r 0 0 efi , a 0 ,

Jan Fe b Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec h

RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE This indicator shows the monthly Recordable Injury / Illness Frequency Rate. A recordable injury / illness case is reported if personnel f m any of the Nuclear Divisions are injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment oeyond first aid.

The recordable injury / illness case numbers for the month of June 1998 was none. The 1998 Fort Calhoun Station year-to-date goal for this indicator is a maximum value of 1.5.

Data Source: Sorensen/Blumenthal (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gebers Trend: None SEP 15,25,26 & 27 24 .

E Contamination Events (Monthly)

O Contamination Events (YTD) 90 -

80 80 - -

70 70 - ,

q 80 - (

i.

50 -  ; l 40 - 30 L i 32 +

g 30 - ,

20 - 16 -

^

8 10 - 88 7 .:i 8 -

0 , , , ,

Jan Feb Mzir Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep oct Nov Dec CLEAN CONTROLLED AREA CONTAMINATIONS >1,000 DISINTEGRATIONS / MINUTE PER PROBE AREA This indicator shows the Personnel Contamination Events in the Clean Controlled Area for contaminations >1,000 disintegrations / minute per probe area for June 1998.

There were 10 personnel contamination events in June 1998. The total year-to-date of Psrsonnel events is 80 at the end of June 1998. This indicator has been classified as "Needing increased Management Attention," due to an upward trend of Year to date contamination events over the past three months.

D:.ta Source: Chase / Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability : Chase /Gebers Trcnd: Needing increased Management Attention SEP 15 & 54 25

35 3o . -+-Total Events 18 Month Tota s .

-e-- Preventable 25 - Personel Error ,

20 <

N = = = = =

10 PN A ' A A A 5-W:  ; *e . -

0 Dec- Jan- I et>. Mar- Apr- May- Jun. Jul-97 Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb. Mar- Apr. May-96 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 97 98 98 98 98 98 PREVENTABLE / PERSONNEL ERROR LERs This indicator depicts 18-month totals for numbers of " Preventable" and " Personnel Error" LERs.

The graph shows the 18-month totals for preventable LERs, the 18-month totals for Personnei Error LERs, and the Personnel Error totals for each month. The LERs are trended based on the LER event date as opposed to the LER report date.

In May 1998, there were three (3) events which were subsequently reported as an LER. One LER was categorized as " Preventable" and One LER was categorized as " Personnel Error" during the month of May.The total LERs for the year 1998 are six. The total Personnel Error LERs for the year 1998 are two.

The year-to-date goal for this indicator is that the year-end values for the 18-month totals not to exceed 5 Preventable and 2 Personnel Error LERs.

NOTE: Due to the way LERs are tracked & reported, this indicator lags by one-month.

Data Source: Tills /Matzke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase Trend: None SEP 15 26

I 1

l Msc Admn 12%

,, ; g 20 %

h ,, l 1mr$ '%

i;if g@w$ta < gg-s

w o 4

?.

Lo Err.

12 %

Design 36 % n 4I other Err.

12 %

Maint.

8%

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the LERs by event date broken down by Root Cause Code for each of the past eighteen months from December 1996, through May 31,1998. To be consistent with the Preventable / Personnel Error LERs indicator, this indicator is reported by the LER event date, as opposed to the LER report date.

The cause codes are intended to identify possible programmatic deficiencies. For detailed descriptions of these codes, see the " Performance Indicator Definitions" section of this report.

NOTE: Due to the way LERs are tracked & reported, this indicator is one-month behind.

There were three events in May 1998 that resulted in an LER. There were no missed surveillance tests resulting in LERs during May 1998. The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goal for this indicator is 0.

Data Source: Tills /Matzke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 1

27

96M oJHM so se 12 Month M FCS Cited Violations (Monthly) y m FCS Non-Cited Violations (Monthly) 2

s. m g 2 E 10 .-

S 5 i 8 2-lE . , a m ,

tu eE E 4E - t.

8 E

4 8

E E '

2 c E.E. -

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June j .5 33 VIOLATION TREND This indicator depicts twelve months of violation data for Fort Calhoun Station. Illustrated monthly are Cited Violations and Non-Cited Violations. The current SALP cycle began on August 3,1997 and ends on January 30,1999.

i The following inspection reports noting violations were issued during June 1998:

l Violation Level IER No. Title IV (1) NCV (2) 98-09 Resident Monthly (dated 6/15/98) l To date, OPPD has received thirty seven violations for inspection reports issued in the current l SALP cycle. Two (2) Level IV violations received in August 1997, and three (3) Level IV l l violations received in October 1997, were carried over from the previous SALP cycle due to a l 1:g in the reporting process.

Level Ill Violations 1 l Level IV Violations 19 Non-Cited Violations 17 i Total 37 The 1998 Fort Calhoun Station Goal for this performance indicator is to be at or below the cited violation trend for the top quartile plants in Region IV.

D:ta Source: Tills /Cavanaugh (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Tills Trend: None 28

COST Goal: Operate Fort Calhoun Station in a manner that cost l effectively maintains nuclear generation as an economically viable contribution to OPPD's bottom line.

Cost consciousness is exhibited at all levels of the  :

organization.

I 29

12 Month Rolling Average

-+- Actual -e-- Budget -- o-- Plan 4.00 3.50 2.50

^

[ m.-

= = = = = =

2.00 1.50 1.00 8EEEENhEkEEEER8EEllg 4 444448 44 4 444 44 4 4 l CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR May 1998 Th3 purpose of this indicator is to quantify the economical operation of Fort Calhoun Station. The Cents Per Kilowatt Hour indicator represents the budget and actual cents per kilowatt hour on a 12-month rolling average for the current y:;cr. The basis for the budget curve is the approved 1998 revised budget. The basis for the actual curve is the Financial and Operating Report. l l

Tha December 31 amounts are also shown for the prior years 1993 through 1997. In addition, the report shows the plan amounts for the years 1999 through 2002 for reference. The basis for the dollars are the Nuclear Long Range Financial Plan and the 1998 Corporate Planning and Budget Review. The basis for the generation is provided by Nuclear Fuels.

l Th312-month rolling average unit price period of ( June 1997 through May 1998) averaged above budget due to the extended refueling outage and less generation during the period. The 12 month rollirg average is 3.02 cents per kilowatt hour.

l Tha year-to-date average is trending in a positive direction.

Cents ner KWH Jan Feb Mar Aor Mav Jun Jul Aua Sao Oct Nov Dec Budget Y-T-D 3.02 2.85 3.27 4.13 3.81 3.53 3.36 3.19 3.09 3.04 2.97 2.92 Actual Y-T-D 2.96 2.85 3.00 3.26 4.16 l

i NOTE: This information normally lagsby a month due to the short turn around required for processing.

D'.ta Source: Belek/ Huang (Acting Manager / Source)

Accountability: Tesar Tr;nd: None 30

DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS l

Goal: Achieve high standards at Fort Calhoun Station resulting in safe, reliable and cost effective power production.

l 31

m Corrective Maintenance m Preventive M'intenance i

i Non-Cerrective/Plantimprovements Fort Calhoun Goal (200) 1000 -

800 --674 692 696 723 8

600 -- 571 538 557 0 l l l l . l . l l Jul Aug sep Oct Ney Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June Non-Outage Maintenance Work Document Backlog a TotalMWos MWo PRIORITY PNOF M PASTR BY N 000

~

• 3 500 '

400-300 -

200 - 125 107 PRI-4 100 0 i 1 B i i 'M i 61.F. PR L1 Prionty Pnority Pnority Pnority Prionty

• 1 2 3 4 5 MAINTENANCE WORKLOAD BACKLOG This indicator shows the backlog of non-outage Maintenance Work Documents remaining open at the end of the reporting month,a breakdown by maintenance classification and priority. The 1998 goa! for this indicator is 200 non-outage corrective maintenance MWDs. The current backlog of corrective MWDs is 353 to ensure that the MWD backlog is worked in a timely manner, non-outage maintenance completion goals have been established as follows:

Goal Priority 1 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Priority 2 7 days Priority 3 30 days Priority 4 90 days F riority 5 As resources permit Data Surce: Chase / Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase /Clemens Trend: Needing increased Management Attention SEP 36 32

Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance 100 %

76% 79 % 79 % 75%

80 %

o 77% 74 % 75% 74 %

~

~ ~ -

61 % s 7  ;

• 7 59 % 59 %

60*/o 7 y -

Q [,

40% i h ", i b ^'

I- i

& a j $s (1 v n 4

(

fe dI g D 20%

[ gf;f h-W[

0%

@k W "

5 Q

$'1 July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June Preventive Maintenance items Overdue Fort Calhoun Goal 2%

77. --

5.50'/. 6.0 2'/.

6% __

4.09 % .

4.01 %

47, -

3.05% 3.03% -

3% -- 2.50 % 2.40%

2.04%

. 8 0'/.

1% -- 0.30% 0.50%

0% M i 1 1 l l i i l i El July Aug sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The top graph shows the ratio of completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance. The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 59% for tha month of June 1998.

The lower graph shows the percentage of scheduled preventive maintenance items that were not completed oy the late finish date. From the period of May 15th thru June 15th there were 6PMk that were completed late or not completed out of 1172 scheduled. The 1998 Fort l CrIhoun monthly goal for the percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue is a l 1

maximum of 2E Dita Source: Chase / Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase /Clemens Trend: None SEP 41 & 44 1

33

Human Performance CRs(Maintenance) 20 -

18 --

16 16 --

g 14 -

c

{12 - 11 4

g 10 -

o y 8--

S 6--

4-- 3 2 2 2 2-- 1 1 1 0-- 1 l l l l l= I I I i l Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June l

PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of Condition Reports related to procedural noncompliance incidents assigned to the Maintenance Deparhient.

The increase in procedural noncompliance in April and May was attributed to the refueling outage and the increase in maintenance activities. This is not yet considered a negative trend.

l l

l l

Data Source: Clemens/Burgg raf (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase /Clemens Trond: None SEP 15,41 & 44 34

Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (5%)

6% --

5% - 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 48% **

4% --

l 3% --

2% -- )

l 1% -- .

l I

0% I I I I I i l l 1 i i l Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

)

CONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA ,

i This indicator shows the percentage of the Radiologically Controlled Area (RCA) that is contaminated based on the total square footage of 70475. At the end of June 1998, the total contaminated area was 3383 square feet which is 4.8 percent of the RCA . The monthly FCS

goal for 1998 is a Maximum of 5% Contaminated Area.

Data Source: Chase / Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase /Gebers Trend: Positive SEP 54 35

I m Monthly Poor Radiation Worker Practices e Total PRWP for 1998 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (<20) 25 20 -

15 - 13 1

10 5- 33 3 3 0 i i i i i i i i Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug sep Oct tbv Dec RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor Radiological Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reporting month.

, The number of PRWPs which are identified each month should indirectly provide a means to l qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance. This indicator needs increased management attention due to a 3 montn increasing trend of poor  !

I I rediation worker practices based on YTD.

l During the month of June there was 1 PRWP identified.

l l

There have been a total of 15 Poor Radiation Worker Practices in 1998.

l The 1998 FCS goalis <20 PRWPs, tne 1997 goal was <15 PRWPs.

Dsta Source: Chase / Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase /Gebers Trend: None SEP52 36 l

l

E Documents Scheduled for Review M Document Reviews complete during month O Documents Overdue 300 --

250 --

200 ---

+ + + q July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Fe b Mar Apr Fay June 1997-1998 DOCUMENT REVIEW The Document Review indicator shows the number of complated, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month.

The documents reviews are performed in-house and include Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual.

During June 1998, there were 126 document reviews scheduled, while 32 reviews were completed. At the end of the month, there were 35 document reviews more than 6 months l overdue. There were 7 new documents initiated during June 1998. '

i Data Source: Ponec/Plath (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Ponec Trend: None SEP 46 37

30 - --

26 - - - - A

/

o\

~

5.A is --

, , '+ s . ,

-A '

10 - --

w y 5- - - -

0 ,

~

i i 3 - i i i JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JuN Jul AUG sEP Oc1 NoV DEC 98 Loggables 98 Non-Loggables 97 Loggables - -+ - 97 Non-Loggables SECURITY INCIDENTS The Loggable and Non-Loggable Incident (Security) Indicators are depicted in the chart above.

The chart depicts the total number of loggable and non-loggable human error events and system failures which occurred during the reporting month.

During the month of June 1998, there were 13 loggable incidents and 6 non-loggable incidents identified (excluding access denials).16% of all incidents identified this month were human error events. Of loggable events,15% wee human performance errors and 85% were system failures.

82% of the loggable system failures were environmental. There were three (3) human error events, two (2) of which were intemal to the security organization. There was one (1) security force error event during the reporting period, it being loggable. There was one (1) loggable access denial during the reporting period. Human error events declined significantly during the reporting period, but continue to be an organizational focus.

This indicator provides information on security performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item No. 58.

Data Source: Sefick/ Clark (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sefick Trend: None SEP 58 38

m Temporary Mod 6catons >1-fuel cycle old (RFO required for rerroval) m Temporary Modifications >6 rronths old (Rerrovable on-hne)

- Fort Calhoun Goals for both Tenporary Modifications' categories 3.5 -

3 3-i July Aug Sep Oct tbv Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS This indicator provides information on the n:Jmber of Temporary Modifications (TMs) greater then one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage (RFO) for removal and the number of TMs removable on-line that are greater than six months old. The 1998 Fort Calhoun monthly goals for both of the TM categories are zero.

At the end of June 1998, there were no TMs that were greater than one-fuel cycle old requiring an outage for removal.

At the end of June 1998, there were three (3) TW installed that were greater than six months old that could be removed on-line. TM 96-039, Railroad Siding / Corridor 26 Door, was installed November 1,1996. EAR 97-219 will close this TM. EAR 97-219 requires Component Testing review and approval. EAR 97-219 is expected to be completed by January 1,1999. TM 97-012, Seal Water Supply to CW-1 A, was installed June 2,1997. TM 97-012 w:s closed on July 1,1998. TM 97-022, LPSI Hesder Pressure Gauge at PT-325, was installed December 12,1997.

l ECN 98-161 will be used to remove this TM. TM 97-022 is expected to be removed by January 1,1999.

l At the end of June 1998, there was a total of eleven (11) TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun Station. Two (2) of the cisven (11) installed TMs require an RFO for removal and nine (9) are removable on-line. In 1998, a total of  ;

fourteen (14) TMs have been installed. At the end of June 1998, there were three (3) procedural or maintenance '

configuration alterations (PMCAs)(a special classification of TM) installed in the Fort Calhoun Station using PRC cpproved procedures which are controlled by Standing Order O-25.

l

, D:ta Source: Phelps/ Frank (Manager / Source)

I Accountability: Phelps/ Core l

Trend: Needing increased Management Attention SEP 62&71 39

i i Total Modification Packages Open 1998 Fort Calhoun Goal (68) 69 -

67 -

65 -

63 - 62 61 61 - T

• 59 - .

57 -  : +

55 , , , , , , , ,

May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS This indicator shows the total number of Outstanding Modifications (excludino outstanding modifications which are orocosed to be cancelled).

Reporting Cateoorv '90 '94 E E E 3 2 Month Form FC-1133 Backlog /in Progress 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 Mod. Requests Being Reviewed 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 Design Engr. Backlog /In Progress 0 0 0 0 3 1 4 Construction Backlog /In Progress 1 0 4 5 17 0 27 Design Engr. Update Backlog /in Progress .ft 4 1 .2 A __Q __12 Totals 6 4 5 7 20 19 61 (Outage + OnLine) (2+4) (2+2) (5+0) (2+5) (16+4) (14+5)

The 1998 year-end Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a maximum of 68 outstanding modifications.

D:ta Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski Trond: None 40

00 -- E A R s QO g ulfin 8 E nginOOrtn e Clo se c ut - N ot in Clo sc o u t W SE m DEN 34 34 30 - 27 20 21 20 20 -

1C g 10 10 11 3E 2 3 3 3 0 - i i -H +- - i a Apr M ov June Apr M sy June Apr M sy June Apr M sy June 0-3 M onths 3 6 M onths 612 M ont hs > 12 H o nth s O Engineering Response m Closeout (SE) 40 36 30 --

l_ 4 3 1 1 8 3 g 3 j 1 0 0 l

Priority 0 Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 6 Priority 6 Closecut 3 9 E A R 's 62

$7 on Overdue S c h e d u le Reponses 33.1% 52.5 %

Response 17 101 o ve rd ue C lo s e c u t s 14 4%

ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST BREAKDOWN

( This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of EARS assigned to Design Engineering and System Engineering. The 1998 year-end goal for this indicator is a maximum of 120 outstanding EARS.

The Total EAR breakdown is as follows:

i EARS opened during the month 8

} EARS closed during the month 17 Total EARS open at the end of the month 118 Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source) f Accountability: Phelos/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 62 41

1 i

100 66 l 72 370 '

DEN 03 l CLOSEOUT >6 21'/. 0 '

15% Months e 33 7.

• h, l ECN STATUS-OVERALL BACKLOG l

i d8 E Backlogged O Received a Completed ,3 Months 11 {

150 -

100 92 86 99 100 100 51 39 % 34 j 28 22 5 25 7 q

"*[*

g, Jan Feb Mar Apr May June l

DESIGN ENGINEERING E Backlogged a Received O Completed 8 3 6 Months M 8.6%

0 1

) , _,

~

~~ Jan Feb Mar Apr May June SYSTEM ENGINEERING ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS Data Source: Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Phelps Trend: None SEP 62 l

l l

l

! 42 l

I- . - c- .- ,

10 aa N ~~

m x s.6 199 Mon hs 4.1 %

E" >6 Months 4.6%

24 5 9 11 11 8

1 8

Mk 4

0< 4 E, Jul Feb Mr Av hby les l

( PROCUREMENT / CONSTUCT10N l

s Bas a w a Ruwad a oW ,

l .

a .::s n 3 33 e " ,,s

• "," 12 5% months l

Jan Feb Mar Apr May .Aine l DRAFTING / CLOSEOUT l ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS I

I Data Source:

Accountability:

Trend:

Jaworski/Livingston (Manager / Source)

Jaworski/Phelps None SEP 62

'I I

I I

e g

85 90 101 Priority 105 DC TYPE F C TYPE 5&6 Priority 19.1% 21.5 % 18% 1&2 59 ) P ity Total Open ECNs = 469 T o t a l O p e n E C N s = 4 69 j O DEN-CbsecuterCratraNdComplete g

O feintenanceConstruinProcumment- Wxk Not Complet 11 Roty182 l 3 Svstem Engineenng - Respmse, Confirmation Not Complete g gf, ,

3 DEN-Ergneemg Not Complete gg, i 120 T j 101 gg 96 S7 .

l 17 T2 13 23 28 O '

ME

~

\i o #w,. 1.:3, 27 NA 17 20 - 42 38 41 44 43

[43 04- '

-  ;-+ ,

' I i l

Jan Ftb Mar Ap- May June FadityChange ECNs CW1 I

ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICES OPEN I

l Data Source: Jaworski/Livingsto;1 (Manager Source)

Accountability: PhelpsiJawcrski Trend: None SEP 62 44

Su'atitute RephK:emert item ECNs Opon Er 33 79 TotalFC EO* Opm Priarty

• ~ Priority 586 1&2 250- 5 22 20 l' 200 - 163 187 iM 207 215 210 200 50 27 28 3 28 25 27 0 g 2r? 27.

Jan-98 Feb-98 Mar-98 Apr-98 May-98 ,ler. "

D GN-Ctneaul DraAng #

QM*m

~ "** ""J'

rJ' ="=

TcadDCEDt Opm mL 5 &6 4A%

20 g ss4 S3.3%

ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICES OPEN l

Data Sor ce: Jaworskillivingston (Manager Source)

Accoun' lity: Phelps/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 62 45

l j

MAINTENANCE RULE UNAVAILABILITY PERFORMANCE e #sses &ceedng unavailabihty cnteria cL- 3 # SSCs Monitored -e- % &ceeding Unaveilabilty Criteria 70 - - - - -

--- 14.0% I

~ ~

, 60 12.0%

N 50 - - -

~

10.0%

e l _ , ,

g 40 - 8.0%

$ 30 - -- 6.0%

m 5 20 - g - 4.0%

10 - ,

. ? N -

2.0%

0- E

l- -

0.0% I 3-96 4-96 1-97 2-97 3-97 4-97 1-98 2-98 QTR i

Maintenance Rule SSC Unavailability This indicator shows the quarterly Maintenance Rule Unavailability Performance value which is based on the performance of SSC's which have specific Availability Perfomance Criteria. A single SSC Inverter Bypass Transfomer #1, EE-4S, continues to exceed its Unavailability Perfomance Crit;rin. The performance trend for this SSC is improving.

D2ta Source Phelps/Swearngin/ Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps Trend: None 46

MAINTENANCE RULE SSC RELIABILITY PERFORMANCE m Tota' Failures (c, D, F) 6 _; Maintenance Preventable Failures --*-- Fbreent Maintenance Preventable 140 70.0 %

120 -- -- 60.0%

, 100 -- -- 50.0%

e 80 -

3 - 40.0%

R g 60 - -- 30.0%

40 -- -

- 20.0%

20 - -- 10.0%

0- l l +- l l  ; 0.0%

3-96 4-96 1-97 2-97 3-97 4-97 1-98 2-98 QTR Maintenance Rule SSC Reliability This indicator shows the quarterly Maintenance Rule Reliabilty Performance value which is based on tracking being compiled based on component failures since 10CFR50.65 was implemented in July of 1996. The percent of " Maintenance Preventable" failures is 57% at the end of the second quarter ofi998. The Reliability Indicator for the second quarter of 1998 showa that the percentage of failures identified as " Maintenance Preventable" and the total ntmber of equipment failures is trending upward. The increase in totalidentified failures is an expected trend attributable to increased Maintenance activities during the refueling outage.

Data Source Phelps/Swearngin/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps Trend: None 47

O Total Requalification Training Hours a SimulatorTraining Hours E Non-Requalification Training Hours E Numberof Exam Failures 40 -

32 32 30 -

25 -

20 - 18 15 - 4 14 2 12 12 l 10 10 - 8 g 8 8 8 8 6

5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- -

r  !

Cycle 971 Cycle 97-2 Cycle 97-3 Cycle 97-4 Cycle 97-5 Cycle 97-6 Cycle 97 7 Cycle 98-1 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING This indicator provides information on the total number of hours of training given to each crew during each Cycle. The simulator training hours shown on the graph are a subset of the total l training hours. Non-Requalification Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP verification &

validation, INPO commitments, GET, Fire Brigade, Safety Meetings, and Division Manager lunches.

)

Exam failures are defined as failures in the written, simulator, and Job Performance Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training.

Note: Rotation 97-6 was the Annual Licensed Operator Requalification Examination rotation l for 1997. There were Three (3) individual and one (1) crew simulator exam failures during rotation 97-6. All remediations were completed prior to the end of the exam week.

Data Source: Conner /Guliani (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Conner /Guliani Trend: None SEP 68 48

E SOEkamsAininistered 5 SOEkamsPassed O ICEmamsAhinistered 5- 0 FOE mamsPassed 4--

3-- l l

l l

2-- '

1--

0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0 l l l 1 l l l l l l l l JLA Ag Sep Od Pbr Dec Jan Rb Ntr Apr Nhy June i

LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS - 1998 This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Operator (RO) l quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally administered quizzes and  ;

exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress.

During the month of June 1998, there were no (SRO) or (RO) training classes in session. The nnxt license class is scheduled to begin in July,1998.

l D:ta Source: Conner /Guliani (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Conner /Guliani Trend: None SEP 68 49

O READY MWD'S E MWD's ON HOLD MADHIIS D MwR's NoT Y ET PROCESSED 300 sSgA 250 256 133 155 96 100 75  ;[

50 - iff

-4, N$ SQ, NFEEA 0 9 Apr-98 May-98 Jun-98 MWD PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 18 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Requests (MWRs) and Maintenance Work Documents (MWDs) that have been approved for inclusion in Cycle 18 RFO. This graph indicates:

Parts Holds - Planning Complete, Awaiting Parts System Engineering Holds - Awaiting System Engineering input to Planning Planner Holds - Maintenance Planner has not completed planning the work package.

ECN Hold - Awaiting Substitute Replacement items ECN from DEN.

In Review- Planning Complete awating SE, ISI and OC review.

{

1 l

D:ta Source: Chase / Johnson (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Chase / Herman Trend: None SEP 31 1

50 I

5LAST OTHIS O FOR SCHEDULE 8 8 88 8 88 8 8 8 8  !

100 - g ." a ." ""

g5 "" "

gz 8 ".

90 .  !;;; 8 8 80 -- R 70 --

. 60 --

5 E 50 --

0 at 40 .

30 --

20 --

10 --

1 0

$ 8 5 P E I Ig Ya 8 a

su E

r o i

E a $e m Si tu f$ k.

E o& g* j

!" 21

? a. s 8

!I 5

i il Ej i l

l COMPONENT TESTING DEPARTMENT AND SPECIAL SERVICES ,

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1998 OUTAGE PROJECTS STATUS REPORT Data Source Phelps/Bloyd/Boughter (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Bloyd/Boughter Trend: None SEP 31 51

+ Actual FHC Dae a Tar 9et RCChte M 599 -

52 &99-5699-4/16/99 -

3f27/99 -

e a a a e a a a a e a a 3/7/99-M599 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '

8 m a m 8 8 m m o a m 8 PROGRESS OF 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE MODIFICATIONS CYCLE 19 This indicator shows the status of Modifications approved for installation during the Cycle 19 R; fueling Outage (September 1999).

The goal for this indicator is to have all modification packages which were identified prior to March 31,1998, PRC approved by March 18,1999.

June 1998 Modifications added: 0 Deleted = 0 Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gambhir/Jaworski Trcnd: None SEP 31 1

l

\ ,

52

l i

NO DATA AVAILABLE ,

1 J

PROGRESS OF CYCLE 19 OUTAGE MODS AND ECNS ADDED TO 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE AFTER l FREEZE DATE l

This indicator will show the status of Modifications and ECte approved for installation during the Cycle 19 Refueling Outage. The goal for this indicator is to have all modification packages PRC approved by their target date. l l

June 1998 Modifications /ECte Added = 0 Deleted = 0 l

l l

Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gambhir/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 33 1

53

• Actual PRC Date a Target PRC Date 10/28/98 - a 9/28/98 -

8/29/98 -

7/30/98 - a a e 6/30/98 -

5/31/98 -

5/1/98 -

4/1/98 -

3/2/98 -

1/31/98 . -

m o o e cn 2%8%E EEEll PROGRESS OF 1998 ON-LINE MODIFICATION PLANNING This indicator shows the status of modifications approved or in review for approval for on-line installation during 1998.

The goal for this indicator is to have all modification packages PRC approved by their scheduled date.

June 1998 Modifications Added:0 Deleted: 0 Data Source: Jaworski/ Walling (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Gambhir/Jaworski Trend: None SEP 31 54 I

I

__- l

l ACTION PLANS SEPINDEX 1

1 l

l l

l l

l l

55

f ACTION PLANS This section lists action plans that have been developed for the performance indicators

! cited as Adverse Trends during the month preceding this report. Also included are Action Plans for indicators that have been cited in the preceding month's report as Needing increased Management Attention for three (3) consecutive months.

In accordance with Revision 5 of NOD-QP-37, the following performance indicators would require action plans based on three (3) consecutive months of performance cited as "Needing increased Management Attention"-

Temporary Modifications (page 39)

Based on the current trend of Temporary Modifications >6 months old (removable on-line) the Temporary Modifications Indicator Needs increased Management Attention. One of the Temporary Modification >6 months old.~ Management is exploring methods to expedite removal of the two remaining Temporary Modifications >6 months old.

56

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS & SEP INDEX PERFORMANCE INDICATOR INDEX push-buttons) provided in the main control room.

Thrs indicator index is calculated from a weighted combination of eleven performance indicator values, which include the following: Unit Capability Factor, 4) Critical means that during the steady-state Unplanned Capability Loss Factor, HPSI, AFW, condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the Emergency AC Power System, Unplanned Automatic effective multiplication (k ,, ) was essentially Scrams, Collective Radiation Exposure, Fuel Reliability, equal to one Thermal Performance, Secondary System Chemistry, and ( Page 12)

Industrial Safety Accident Rate.

( Page 6 )

HIGH PRESSURE SAFETY INJECTION SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR The sum of the known (planned and unplanned)

The ratio of the available energy generation over a giver unavailable hours and the estirnated unavailable hours for time period to the reference energy generation (the the h:gh pressure safety injection system for the reporting energy that could be produced if the unit were operated period divided by the critical hours for the reporting period continuously at full power under reference arnbient multiplied by the number of trains in the high pressure conditions) o*.er the same time period, expressed as a safety injection system.

percentage. ( Page 10 )

INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT RATE -INPO UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR This indicator is defined as the ' number of accidents per The ratio of the unplanned energy losses during a given 200,000 man-hours worked for all utility personnel period of time, to the reference energy generatbn (the permanently assigned to the station that result in any of energy that could be produced if the unit were operated the following:

continuously at full power under reference arrcient conditions) over the same time period, expressed as a 1) One or more days of restricted work (excluding percentage. ( Page 11 ) the day of the accident);

2) One or more days away from work (excluding UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR fiCRAMS PER the day of the accident); and 7,000 CRITICAL HOURS Fatalities.

3)

Contractor personnel are not included for this indicator.

This indicator is defined as the number r,f unplanned (Page 13) automatic scrams (RPS logic actuation 4) that occur per 7,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> of critical operatior AUXlLIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE The value for this indicator is calculathd by multiplying the total number of unplanned automatic reactor scrams in a The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) specific time period by 7,000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br />, then dividing that unavailable hours and the estimated unavailable hours for number by the total number of hours critical in the same the auxiliary feedwater system for the reporting period time penod. The indicator is further defined as follows: divided by the critical hours for the reporting period multiplied by the number of trains in the auxiliary

1) Unplanned means that the scram was not an feedwater system.( Page 14 )

anticipated part of a plar ned test.

EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY

2) Scram means the aute matic shutdown of the SYSTEM PERFORMANCE reactor by a rapid insertion of negative reactivity (e g., by control rods, Iquid injection system, The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) etc.) that is caused by actuation of the reactor unavailable and the estimated unavailable hoursfor the protection system. The signal may have resulted emergency AC power system for the reporting period from exceeding a set point or spurious. divided by the number of hours in the reporting period

3) Automatic means that the initial signal that multiplied by the number of trains in the emergency AC caused actuation of the reactor protection power system.( Page 15) system logic was provided from one of the sensor's monitoring plant parameters and THERMAL PERFORMANCE conditions, rather than the manual scram switches or, manual turbine tiip switches (or The ratio of the design gross heat rate (corrected) to the adjusted actual gross heat rate, expressed as a percentage. ( Page 16) 57

1 l '

i PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS & SEP INDEX FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE I

This indicator is defined as the steady-stata primary Collectr'e radiation exposure is the total external whole-coolant 1-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium body dose received by all on-site personnel (including I contribution and normalized to a common punfcation contractors and visitors) during a time period, as l

rate. Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposited on measured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD).

reactor core internals from previous defective fuel or is Collecuve radiation exposure is reported in units of present on the surface of fuel elements from the person-rem. This indicator tracks radiological work manufactuig process. Steady state is defined as performance for SEP #54.

continuous operation for at least three days at a power ( Page 19 )

1: vel that does not vary more than + or -5%. Plants should collect data for this indicator at a power level INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT AND DISABLING sbove 85%, when possible. Plants that did not operate at INJURY /lLLNESS RATE stzady-state power above 85% should collect data for this in6cator at the highest steady-state power level attained The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in during the month. improving industrial safety performance for utility personnel permanently assigned to the station.

The density correction factor is the ratio of the specific Contractor work-hours are not included in this indicator, volume of coolant at the RCS orerating temperature (540 Also, this indicator is defined as .he number of accidents drgrees F., Vf = 0/)217) divided by the specirc volume of for all utility personnel permane ntly assigned to the coolant at normal letdown temperature (120* F at outlet station, involving days away from work per 200,000 man- l of the letdown cooling heat exchanger, Vf = 0.0163), hours worked (100 man-years). This does not include which results in a density correction factor for FCS equal contractor personnel. This indicator tracks personnel 1 to 1.33. ( Page 17 ) performance for SEP #25,26 & 27.(Page 20 )

)

l SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE INDEX WASTE Tha Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) is a calculation This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid bised on the concentration of key impunties in the rshtive waste actually shipped for burial. This s3condary side of the plant. These key impurities are the indicator also shows the volume of low-level radbactive rnost likely cause of deterioration of the steam generators. waste which is in temporary storage, the amount of Criteria for calculating the CPI are: radioactive oil that has been shipped off-site for  ;

processing, and the volume of solid dry radioactive waste j

1) The plant is at greater than 30 percent power; and which has been shipped off-site for processing. Low-level solid radioactive waste consists of dry active waste, i

2) the power is changing less than 5% per day. sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a {

result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance.

The CPIis calculated using the following equation: Dry radioactive waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic cpl = ((sodium /0.79) + (Chloride /1.52) +(Sulfate /1.44) + containers, and any other material to be disposed of at a (Iron /3.30) + (Copper /0.30)+(Condensate 02/2.90))/6 low-level radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all Where: Sodium, sulfate, chloride and condensate radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of dissolved spent fuel processing. This indicator tracks radiological work performance for SEP #54. ( Page 21 )

oxygen are the monthly ailerage blowdown concentrations in ppb, iron and copper are monthly time RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES weighted average feedwater concentrations in ppb. The FREQUENCY RATE d nominator for esof the five factors is the INPO median value. If the monthly average for a specife parameter is The number of injuries requiring more than normal first itss than the INPO median value, the median value is aid per 200,000 man-hours worked. This indicator trends used in the calculation. personnel performance for SEP #15,25 and 26.

( P.;ge 18) ( Page 24 ) l CLEAN CONTROLLED AREA CONTAMINATIONS 2*.

1,000 DISINTEGRATIONS! MINUTE PER PROBE AREA 58

1 i PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS & SEP INDEX

Th3 personnel contamination events in the clean maintenance functonal organization.

I controlled area. This indcator tracks personnel Activites included in this category are l

performance for SEP #15 & 54. ( Page 25 ) maintenance, testing, surveillance, calibration and radiation protection.

PREVENTABLEIPERSONNEL ERROR LERs j

5) Design / Construction / Installation / Fabric j Thb indcator is a breakdown of LERs. For purposes of LER ation Problem This cause code covers a event classification, a " Preventable LER* is defined as: full range of programmatic deficiencies in I the areas of design, construction, i An event for which the root cause is personnel error (i.e., installation, and fabrication (i.e., loss of inappropriate acton by one or more individuals), inadequate control power due to underrated fuse, i administrative controls, a design construction, installation, equipment not qualifed for the I installation, fabreaton problem ('rwolving work completed by or environment, etc.).

supervised by OPPD personnel) or a maintenance problem (attrbuted to inadequate or ~rnproper upkeep / repair of plant 6) Equipment Failures (Electronic Piece-equpment). Al o, the cause of the event must have occurred Parts or Environmental-Related l within approximately two years of the " Event Date" specifed in Failures)- This code is used for spurious the LER (e g., an event for which the cause is attrbuted to a failures of electronic piece-parts and failures problem with the onginal design of the plant would not be due to meteorological conditions such as considered preventable). lightning, ice, high winds, etc. Generally, it includes spurious or one-time failures.

For purposes of LER event classification, a " Personnel Error" Electric components included in this LER is defined as follows: category are circuit cards, rectifers, bistables, fuses, capacitors, diodes, An event for whch the root cause is inappropriate acton on the resistors, etc.

part of one or more individuals (as opposed to being attributed in addition this indicator reports SEP # 6 &

to a department or a general group). Also, the inappropriate 61,(Page 27) acton must have occurred within approximately two years of the " Event Date" specifed in the LER. Additionally, each VIOLATION TREND this indicator is defined as Fort revent classifed as a " Personnel Error" should also be Calhoun Station Cited Violations and Non-Cited classired as " Preventable." This indicator trends Violations trended over 12 months. Additionally, i personnel performance for SEP ltem #15. ( Page 26 ) CitedViolations for the top quartile Region IV plant istrended over 12 months (lagging the Fort LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ROOT CAUSE CalhounStation trend by 2-3 months). It is the EREAKDOWN FortCalhoun Station goal to be at or below the cited violation trend for thetopquartileRegion IV plant.

This indicator shows the number and root cause code for ( Page 28 )

, Licensee Event Reports. The root cause codes are as l follows: CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR

1) Administrative Control Problem - The purpose of this indicator is to quantify the economical l Management and supervisory deficiencies operation of Fort Calhoun Station. The cents per kilowatt j that affect plant programs or activities (i.e., hour indictor represents the budget and actual cents per poor planning, breakdown or lack of kilowatt hour on a twelve-month average for the current adequate management or supervisory year, The basis for the budget curve is the approved control, incorrect procedures, etc). yearly budget. The basis for the actual curve is the Financial and Operating Report.

2) Licensed Operator Error-This cause ( Page 30 )

code captures errors of I omission / commission by licensed reactor I operators during plant activities.

j 3) Other Personnel Error- Errors of I omission / commission committed by non-licensed personnel involved in plant actnntes.

4) Maintenance Problem - The intent of this cause code is to capture the full range of problems which can be attributed in any J

way to programmatic defeiencies in the 1 59 1

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS & SEP INDEX MAINTENANCE WORKLOAD BACKLOG PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the backlog of non-outage Maintenance Work Documents remaining open at the The number of identified incidents concerning end of the reporting month. Maintenance classifications maintenance procedural problems, the number of closed are defined as follows: irs related to the use of procedures (includes the number of closed irs caused by procedural noncompliance), and Corrective - Repair and restoration of equipment or the number of closed procedural noncompliance irs.

compo,1ents that have failed or are malfunctioning and This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP are not performing their intended function. #15,41 and 44. ( Page 34)

Preventive - Actions taken to maintain a piece of CONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA equipment within design operating conditions, prevent equipment failure, and extend its life and are performed The percentage of the Raciation Controlled Area,which prior to equipment failure.

includes the auxiliary bu;lding, the radwaste building, and areas of the C/RP building, that is contaminated based on Non-Corrective / Plant Improvements - Maintenance the total square footage. This indicator tracks activities performed to implement station improvements performance for SEP #54. ( Page 35) or to repair non-plant equipment.

RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM Maintenance Work Priorities are defined as:

The number of identified poor radiological work practces Emergency - Conditions which significantly degrade (PRWPs) for the reporting month. This indicator tracks station safety or availability.

radiological work performance for SEP #52. ( Page 36) h immediate Action - Equipment derciencies which DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL) significantly degrade station reliability. Potential for unit shutdown or power reduction.

The Document Review indicator shows the number of documents reviewed, the number of documents Operations Concern - Equipment deficiencies which scheduled for review, and the number of document hinder station operation.

reviews that are overdue for the reporting month. A document review is considered overdue if the reviewis Essential- Routine corrective maintenance on not complete within six essential station systems and equipment. months of the assigned due date. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #46. ( Page 37 )

Non-Essential- Routine corrective maintenance on rion-essential station systems and equipment. SECURITY INCIDENTS Plant improvement - Non-corrective rnaintenance and The total number of security incidents for the reporting plant improvements.

month depicted in two graphs. This indicator tracks security performance for SEP #58. ( Page 38)

This indicator tracks maintenance performance for SEP #36. ( Page 32 ) TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE The number of temporary mechanical and electrical

& PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE configuraN to the plant's systems.

The ratio of preventive maintenance (including 1) Temporary configurations are defined as surveillance testing and calibration procedures) to the electrcal jumpers, electrical blocks, sum of non-outage corrective maintenance and mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks preventive maintenance completed over the reporting which are installed in the plant operating 9eriod. The ratio, expressed as a percentage, is systems and are not shown on the latest calculated based on man-hours. Also displayed are the revision of the P&lD, schematic, percent of preventive maintenance items in the month connection, wiring, or flow diagrams.

that were not completed or administratively closed by the scheduled date plus a grace period equal to 25% of the 2) Jumpers and blocks which are installed for scheduled interval. This indkator tracks preventive Surveillance Tests, Maintenance maintenarme activities for SEP #41. ( Page 33 ) Fiocedures Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures or Operating 60

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS & SEP INDEX LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS Procedures are not considered as This indicator shows the number of SRO and/or RO temporary modrfcations unless the jumper quizzes and exams that are administered and passed or block remains in place after the test or each month. This indicator tracks training performance procedure is complete. Jumpers and for SEP #68.

blocks instaliz! in test or lab instruments ( Page 49 )

are not considered as temporary modfcat;ons MWD PLANNING STATUS (CYCLE 19 REFUELING OUTAGE)

3) Scaffold is not considered a temporary modication. Jumpers and blocks which This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance are installed and for whch Mrs have been Work Requests (MWRs) and Maintenance Work submitted will be considered as temporary Documents (MWDs) that have been approved for modifications until final resolution of the MR inclusion in the Cycle 18 Refueling Outage. This indicator and the jumper or block is removed or is tracks performance #31 permanently recorded on the drawings. ( Page 50)

This indicator tracks temporary modifications SEP #62 and 71. SPECIAL SERVICES ENGINEERING AND

( Page 39) COMPONENT TESTING DEPARTMENT,1998 OUTAGE PROJECTS STATUS REPORT ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR)

BREAKDOWN This indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31.

( Page 51)

This indicator shows a breakdown, by age and priority of the EAR, of the number of EARS assigned to Design PROGRESS OF 1999 REFUELING OUTAGE Engineering Nuclear and System Engineering. This MODIFICATIONS CYCLE 19 indicator tracks performance for SEP #62. ( Page 41 )

This indicator shows the status of Modifications approved ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS for insta!!ation during the Cycle 19 Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31. ( Page 52 )

The number of ECNs that were opened, ECNs that were completea, and open backlog ECNs awaiting completion PROGRESS OF CYCLE 19 OUTAGE MODS AND by DEN for the reporting month. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #62. ECN'S ADDED TO '99 REFUELING OUTAGE AFTER FREEZE DATE

( Page 42&43 )

This indicator will show the status of Modifcathns and ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICES OPEN ECN's approved for installation during the Cycle 19 Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance for This indcator breaks down the number of Engineering SEP #33. ( Page 53 )

Change Notoes (ECNs) that are assigned to Design Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineering, and Progress of 1990 0 Line modification Planning Maintenance. The graphs provide dcta on ECN Facility Chznges open, ECN Substitute Replacement items This i-dcator shows the status of modtfcations approved open, and ECN Document Changes open. This indicator or in review for approval for on-line installation during tracks performance for SEP #62.

1998. This indicator tracks performance for SEP # 31.

( Page 44 &45) ( Page 54 )

LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING The total number of hours of training given to each crew dunng each cycle. Also provided are the simulator training hours (which are a subset of the total training hours). the number of non-REQUALIFICATION training hours and the number of exam failures. This indcator tracks training performance for SEP # 68. ( Page 48) 61

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM lNDEX The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators Index is to list performance indicators related to SEP rams with parameters that can be trended.

SEP Reference Number 15 Page e increase HPES and IR Accountability through use of Performance Indicators Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) .. . .. . ... . . . . .. 34 Recordable Injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . . . . . . . . . . . ...... .. . . . . 24 Clean Controlled Area Contaminations >1,000 Disintegrations / Minute Per Probe Area . .. . . 25 Preventable / Personnel Error LERs . .... . . .. .. . ... . .. . .... 26 SEP Reference Numbers 25. 26. & 27

. Training Program for Managers and Supervisors Implemented

. Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements e implement Supervisory Enforcement of Industrial Safety Standards Industrial Safety Accident and Disabling injury / Illness Rate . . ... .. .. . . .. . 20 Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . . . ... . .. . 24 SEP Reference Number 31 e Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWD Planning Status (Cycle 19 Refueling Outage) . .. .. .. ... ... .. .. . 50 Component Testing Department, Special Services Engineering Department 1998 Outage Projects . 51 Progress of 1999 Refueling Outage Modifications Cycle 19 . . . . ... . .... . .. . 52 Progress of 1998 On-Line Modification Planning .. .. . . . ... . ... . . . .. 54 SEP Reference Number 33 e Develop On-Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule Progress of Cycle 19 Outage MODS and ECN's Added to '99 Refueling Outage After Freeze Date ... 53 SEP Reference Number 36 -

= Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Workload Backlogs (Corrective Non-Outage) ... . . .. . . . 32 SEP Reference Numbers 41 & 44

• Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule e Compliance With and Use of Procedures Ritio of Preventive to Total Maintenance & Preventive Maintenance items Overdue .. . 33 Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Mainter.ance) . . . . . 34 SEP Reference Number 46 Desiga a Procedures Control and Administrative Program Document Review .. .... . . .. .. . .

. .. 37 62

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX SEP Reference Number 52 Page

. Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practicos Radiological Work Practices Program . . . .. . . . . . ... . .... . 36 SEP Reference Number 54 e Complete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Collective Radiaton Exposure ..... . ....... . .. ... . . . . . .. . ..... . .. 19 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste . . . . . . .. . . ... .. .. ..... 21 Clean Controlled Area Disintegrations >1,000 Counts / Minute Per Probe Area

_ . .... . . 25 Contaminated Radiation Controlled Area .. . .. .. . ... 35 SEP Reference Number 58 e Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program Securityincidents .

38 SEP Reference Numbers 80 & 61 e improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program

. Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Licensee Report LER Root Cause Breakdown Number of Missed Surveillance Tests resulting in Licensee Event Reports . ... . ... . . 27 SEP Reference Number 62

. E;tablish Interim System Engineers Temporary Modifications . .. . ... .. ... . .. .. . . . 39 Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown . .. . . ... . ., . . 41 Engineering Change Notice Status . . . .. . . . . .. ... . . .. ... .. 42&43 Engineering Change Notices Open . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . 44 &45 SEP Reference Number 68 e Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and establish means to monitor Operator Training License Operator Requalification Training . . .. . . . . . . ,. 48 License Candidate Exams . .. . ... . . ... . .. . . .. . 49 SEP Reference Number 71 e improve Controls over Temporary Modifications Tcmporary Modifications . . . . .. . . . .. . 39 63

l Fort Calhoun Station Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates i

! EVENT I DATE RANGE l PRODUCTION (MWH) l CUMULATIVE (MWH) l Cycle 6 06/11/80-09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 Cycla 7 12/21/81-12/03/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 Cycle 8 04/06/83-03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405  !

I Cycle 9 07/12/84-09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 Cycle 10 01/16/86-03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 Cycle 11 06/08/87-09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 Cycle 12 01/31/89-02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 Cycle 13 05/29/90-02/01/92 5,451,069 51,040,528 Cycle 14 05/03/92-09/25/93 4,981,485 56,022,013 Cycle 15 11/26/93-02/20/95 5,043,887 61,065,900 Cycle 16 04/14/95-10/05/96 5,566,108 66,632,007 Cycle 17 11/25/99-04/01/98 3,16. 684 71,815,678 i

CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS " RECORDS" First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47p.m.)

First Electricity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH) September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%) May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 Days) June 8,1987-September 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800 KWH) October 1987 Most Productive Fuel Cycle (5,451,069 MWH-Cycle 13) May 29,1990-February 1,1992 Shortest Refueling Outage (52 days) February 20,1995-April 14,1995 i

, 64

.